Next Article in Journal
Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Protease Activity in Forest Floor of Norway Spruce Stand
Next Article in Special Issue
Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems in Degraded Landscapes in West Java, Indonesia
Previous Article in Journal
Diagnostic Assessment and Restoration Plan for Damaged Forest around the Seokpo Zinc Smelter, Central Eastern Korea
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adoption of Agroforestry in Northwest Viet Nam: What Roles Do Social and Cultural Norms Play?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Global Trends in Research on Wild-Simulated Ginseng: Quo Vadis?

1
Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Jalan CIFOR, Situ Gede, Bogor 16115, Indonesia
2
Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University, 1447 Pyeongchang-daero, Daehwa, Pyeongchang 25354, Gangwon, Korea
3
Institutes of Green Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University, 1447 Pyeongchang-daero, Daehwa, Pyeongchang 25354, Gangwon, Korea
4
Center for International Agricultural Partnership, Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju-si 58217, Jeollanam-do, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2021, 12(6), 664; https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060664
Submission received: 26 April 2021 / Revised: 14 May 2021 / Accepted: 17 May 2021 / Published: 24 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Systematic Approach to Agroforestry Policies and Practices in Asia)

Abstract

:
To the best of our knowledge, no study has systematically reviewed and analyzed the research trends of wild-simulated ginseng (WSG) used for food or medicinal purposes in many countries. WSG, a non-timber forest product, has been traditionally produced using agroforestry practices, and it has been consumed in various ways for a long time. WSG has a great demand in the market due to its medicinal effects, particularly in improving forest livelihoods and human health. Due to the significance of WSG, we conducted this research to explore the global research trends on WSG using systematic review methodology and keyword analysis. We used two international academic databases, the Web of Science and SCOPUS, to extract 115 peer-reviewed articles published from 1982 to 2020. The research subjects, target countries, and keywords were analyzed. Our results indicate four categories of WSG research subjects, namely growth conditions, components, effects on humans/animals, and the environment of WSG, and the case studies were mainly from the Republic of Korea, China, and the USA. Through topic modelling, research keywords were classified into five groups, namely medicinal effects, metabolite analysis, genetic diversity, cultivation conditions, and bioactive compounds. We observed that the research focus on WSG changed from the biological properties and cultivation conditions of WSG to the precise identification and characterization of bioactive metabolites of WSG. This change indicates an increased academic interest in the value-added utilization of WSG.

1. Introduction

Ginseng obtained from plant roots has been used as herbal medicine for thousands of years. It has been recorded as an important medicine in the oldest medicinal herb book, Sinnongbonchogyeong (B.C. 3300) [1]. Before ginseng was cultivated, wild ginseng was collected and consumed as an edible herb. Increasing demand for wild ginseng resulted in the overexploitation of wild ginseng to meet the demands of the industrial market. Agroforestry practices have been used to cultivate wild-simulated ginseng (WSG). WSG is a perennial semi-negative, semi-annotated pericardium belonging to the genus “Panax” of the family Araliaceae. WSG has been used for food or medicinal purposes in many countries, including the Republic of Korea, China, Japan, Russia, and the USA [2]. WSG is known by different names, including WSG, wild-cultivated ginseng, mountain-cultivated ginseng, and forest-cultivated ginseng, among others. In this study, we use the term WSG because it is officially used by the governments of the Republic of Korea, USA, and Canada [3,4,5]. We define WSG as the ginseng grown under trees in mountain areas via artificial transplantation of seeds or seedlings.
The active components of WSG can be largely divided into saponins (known as ginsenosides) and non-saponins (polyacetylenes, phenolic compounds, acidic polysaccharides, peptides, alkoxides, and amino acid derivatives), depending on the characteristics of chemical structures. Other components of WSG include volatile oil, sugar, starch, pectin, and minerals [6]. WSG contains many functional components that exert excellent effects on human health, such as anti-obesity activity [7], activation of the sympathetic nervous system [8], anti-fatigue activity [9], memory loss improvement [10], spatial cognitive ability improvement [11], cancer prevention, anti-cancer activity [12], and liver functional resistance [13]. Since the health effects of WSG are more recognized than those of cultivated ginseng [14], WSG is mostly produced only as a health supplement [15]. WSG is rarely cultivated for processing as a general food or cosmetic product due to the high production cost of WSG and difficulties in cultivation. However, due to the increasing interest and demand for eco-friendly non-timber forest products (NTFPs), WSG has gained attention as a high-value product. Due to the increasing production and demand, especially in the Republic of Korea [16], WSG has become a major source of income to forest communities. Thus, it is necessary to build scientific databases and accumulate research data for WSG [17].
Due to the greater use of WSG, many studies have been conducted on its growth conditions and characteristics. Many studies have also been conducted on farming locations [18], harvest, growth [19], effectiveness [7,8,9,10,11,12,13], and identification of genetic traits [20] and genome sequences [21]. Research trend analysis reflects academic orientation based on the aggregate results of integrating and analyzing key topics or values investigated in previous studies, such as medicine [22], education [23], forestry [24], and cultivated ginseng [25,26]. Such research trend analysis is valuable for diagnosing the current status and suggesting a direction for subsequent research needed to compensate for the knowledge gaps from individual research [27]. Moreover, industrialization of WSG requires a scientific and systematic approach considering the environment, location conditions, cultivation technology, efficacy, and environmental impact. Nevertheless, to date, no study has systematically reviewed and analyzed the research trends of WSG. Thus, this study seeks to examine the trends in WSG research using systematic review and topic modelling which have been widely used to analyze the recent research trends in linguistic, political, medical and biomedical, geographical science, etc. [28]. The study aimed to achieve answers to the following research questions: (1) What are the dominant keywords in the WSG study? (2) What is the main topic of the WSG study? The study findings can contribute to designing future studies on WSG, including the selection of topics.

2. Wild-Simulated Ginseng

2.1. History of Wild-Simulated Ginseng in the World

The family Panax, which comprises thirteen species, is extensively spread over East Asia to North America. Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer has been grown in Asian countries for thousands of years. P. ginseng is the only Panax species with a long history of cultivation [29]. The Shennong Bencao Jing (Shennong’s Herbal Classic), a traditional document focusing on medicinal herbs, was written during the 1st century AD [30]. Ginseng has been artificially planted since the 15th century [30]. Since then, wild ginseng, which has been reseeded in the mountains or forest areas, has been cultivated and consumed as a herbal remedy [30]. There are historical documents on WSG in China and the Republic of Korea. The first book was Do-gyeong-bon-Cho (A.D. 1061), which was recorded in China as a bibliographic research on wild-simulated farming archives on ginseng during the reign of King Injong of the Song dynasty. The document focuses on the specific shapes of WSG throughout its growth cycle for four, five, and ten years [1]. During the rule of King In-Jong of the Koryeo Dynasty (A.D. 1122), some documents were written on artificially transplanted and reseeded ginseng [31]. During the Sejong era, wild ginseng has been reported in “Jiriji” (A.D. 1419–1450), which includes different characteristics of wild and cultivated ginseng. During the Sukjong era (A.D. 1675–1720), technological advancements in farming began to be prevalent through books on ginseng cultivation methods, including its distribution and accumulation, and the pervasiveness of ginseng agriculture was declared. Jeongjo Annal of the Jeongjo period (A.D. 1777–1800) documents the plantation of simulated ginseng near villages, thus highlighting its active expansion in communities [1].
Compared to WSG, studies on American ginseng (P. quinquefolius) have been conducted more recently [32]. Wild American ginseng was first discovered and cultivated in the New England forests in the early 1700s [33]; however, the farmers moved to a new area without a stable settlement. The cultivation of ginseng facilitated settlement in the region [33,34]. Harvesting and trading ginseng promoted economic growth [33]. Once the trade value was surprisingly high, a report stated that at least 64 million roots were exported in 1841 [35]. During the mid-1800s, WSG cultivation decreased significantly due to the transition of land from forest to farmland [33,35]. Forest degradation was accelerated in the 20th century, and thus it is difficult to harvest mountain ginseng, which grew on steep slopes [35].

2.2. Physiology and Growth of Wild-Simulated Ginseng

Ginseng grows and reproduces well with specific conditions: acidic or weak acidic soil (pH 4–6); 10–30° slope; sufficient nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and other organic contents [21]. As a perennial plant belonging to the genus Panax, WSG has similar physiological and growth characteristics to field-cultivated ginseng. However, WSG also has some unique characteristics. Both have main root, fine roots, and lateral roots. Main root is connected to the stem through rhizomes and the leaves are connected to the stem through leaf stalks [36]. However, they both have to be properly shaded for growth. The difference in the shading process is mentioned in the definition of WSG. Ginseng can be shaded using anthropogenic methods, whereas WSG must be shaded without any artificial measure. The biggest and most recognizable physiological characteristic is that WSG grows slower than field-cultivated ginseng, thus resulting in the smaller size of WSG. Furthermore, the photosynthesis rate is significantly lower in the leaves of WSG, mainly due to the cultivation environment, especially the lack of phosphorus in mountain soil [37]. The root volume is affected by the forest physiognomy of the cultivation area. In a mixed forest of soft and hardwood, the relationship between root volume and diameter at breast height (DBH) of surrounding trees shows a positive correlation [21]. The Standard Manual for WSG Cultivation from the Republic of Korea suggests that WSG should be cultivated in a mixed forest with trees having at least 15 cm breast height diameter and 10 m height for the overstory woods [38]. During proper growth conditions, WSG grows up to 92 mm (shoot) and 32 mm (root) in the second year and grows 187 mm (shoot) and 86 mm (root) in the fifth year [36]. In the Republic of Korea, 144 t of WSG (USD 36 million) was harvested in 2019 [39].

2.3. Effects of Wild-Simulated Ginseng

WSG has been regarded as a medicinal plant due to its significant functions [40]. The quality of WSG is considered superior to that of field-cultivated ginseng [37]. Furthermore, the biophysical activities of WSG are greater than that of ginseng [41]. For example, in skin cancer, ginseng has a chemopreventive effect, while WSG has a chemotherapeutic effect [41]. WSG shows diverse effects such as anti-oxidation [42], anti-inflammation [43], anti-tumor, and immune-enhancing activities [44]. Moreover, WSG has been used in the treatment of various health-related problems, including dry eye syndrome [45], obesity [46], high blood pressure [47], and cancer [48]. WSG has also been studied for human health and as a cosmetic due to its anti-wrinkle effect [42]. Additionally, many studies have reported the effects of WSG on the environment. Chowdhury and Bae [49] found some bacterial endophytes separated from WSG, which indicate significant inhibitory reactions against ginseng pathogens. Furthermore, some studies have reported an interconnection between mountain-cultivated ginseng and biodiversity [49,50,51]. Recent studies have shown that, due to the differences in anatomical structures and physiological conditions, different tissues of WSG retain diverse types of bacterial endophytes, and thus WSG transforms a wide variety of microbial communities [52]. Despite the benefits and effects of ginseng, which have been proven through various studies, few studies [37,53] have examined the effects of WSG. Thus, additional studies intensively focusing on the effects of WSG are needed.

2.4. Components of Wild-Simulated Ginseng

WSG comprises general components, such as water, crude fat, crude protein, crude ash, and nitrogen, and effective components such as crude saponin, including ginsenosides, polyphenol content, acid polysaccharides, and flavonoids. These WSG components have remarkable effects on blood pressure control, liver functions, anti-oxidation, anti-cancer, anti-diabetes, anti-inflammation, and anti-obesity effects [1,25,54,55]. Particularly, the polyphenol and flavonoid contents are related to anti-oxidation. The acidic polysaccharide content helps to boost immunity [54,55]. Ginsenoside, a type of glycoside combined to a glycone and aglycone, gets absorbed and transformed in the body to cause several benefits [54,56]. The components of WSG are closer to those of wild ginseng than to those of field-cultivated ginseng. The representative ginsenosides measured frequently are Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd, Re, Rf, Rg1, Rg2, Rg3, Rh2, F2, and CK. Rh2 and CK are not detected in cultivated ginseng, but they are detected only in wild ginseng and WSG [54,55,57]. The components of WSG vary with age, harvest time, and cultivation environment.

3. Topic Modelling

The explosive growth in structured/unstructured data and the development of methodologies for processing and analyzing such data have prompted interests in big data. Big data analysis is divided into data mining techniques with structured data, and text mining techniques with unstructured text data [58]. Text mining techniques determine the latent distribution of semantic patterns and topics from a text by classifying the unstructured text data into units that can be categorized in the computer’s analytical process [59]. The difference between text mining and traditional analytical methods is that the data for text mining is larger in scale and utilizes various language processing techniques. The main issue in text mining is how to analyze text rather than the amount of text to be analyzed. Thus, there is a growing interest in text mining, which is specialized in extracting keywords from text on a large scale and conducting statistical analysis in automated environments, called topic modelling [59].
Topic modelling methods for analyzing topics in documents include latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), probabilistic latent semantic analysis (pLSA), and latent semantic indexing (LSI) [28]. Among them, the LDA method is most commonly used in the analysis of academic research trends [28]. LDA is based on LSI, but it is modified by supplementing the shortcomings of pLSA, which has the advantage of facilitating the identification of relationships between words and concepts [28]. Furthermore, LDA-based topic modelling effectively classifies words with different meanings into context, although the algorithm is simple and the word used is the same [60]. Most importantly, we can attempt to classify research topics, such that we can examine the overall distribution and composition of the topics and the potential topic structures in the study; additionally, we can capture related topics [60]. The LDA method also has advantages over content analysis as LDA-based topic modelling consists of a single document of several topics, each of which consists of a combination of words belonging to that topic [28,60]. For this reason, a single word can be used for multiple topics and not just for one topic. Thus, a document is a mixture of topics, and the topic is a mixture of words [61]. By aggregating the topics, we can also analyze them based on the LDA algorithm to identify the research trends in a particular work. In topic modelling, the number of topics is determined by the researcher, who performs several pre-checks to determine the number of topics, and all words in the document are sequentially arranged in descending order of probability values.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Data Collection (Identification)

We used two major databases, SCOPUS and the Web of Science, to search bibliographic information dealing with WSG collected up to October 2020. The first search was done under the title, abstract, and keywords of the paper itself, which includes WSG synonyms (Appendix A). This research follows the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram [62], which has four steps, namely identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion (Figure 1).

4.2. Article Screening, Eligibility, and Inclusion

Three hundred and eighty-three articles collected from the identification stage were filtered through the next three stages, namely screening, eligibility, and inclusion. The literature search and selection were recorded independently by five coders, who compared the remaining records in each course [63]. Coders then screened the relevance of articles to WSG by reviewing the full text. Finally, a total of 115 articles of literature were used for the analysis (Figure 1).

4.3. Coding Strategy

A coding category system was developed to achieve the purpose of this study. After reviewing relevant literature, such as systematic reviews on cultivated ginseng [25,26,64], six categories were constructed, namely bibliographical data, study sites and fields, growth conditions, components, and effects on environment and animals (including humans), as stated previously in Section 2 (Table 1). This categorization was not designed to explore the quality/quantity but to examine general trends (e.g., WSG species, research fields, and publications years) and cause-and-effect relationships (e.g., WSG effect on human/animal or environments). By understanding the research trends in each category, we can determine the direction of WSG research. Five researchers independently coded, compared, and coordinated the results by discussing the mismatched data until reaching a consensus to increase the coding reliability.

4.4. Topic Modelling

For topic modelling, this study utilized a list of keywords selected by researchers for topic modelling. Data preprocessing and cleaning are essential before starting LDA [60], as analysis results vary depending on the extracted keywords, or the author may choose unintended keywords, resulting in different results. To minimize the indexing effect of keywords extracted from the morpheme analysis process for data preprocessing, we refined the data by building dictionaries. Particularly, all keywords were reviewed to identify spacing, abbreviations, and word-form unification. For example, as the same words, “WSG” and “wild-cultivated ginseng”, which are recognized as designated words with the same meaning, were in the same form to prevent them from being treated as different words when analyzing morphemes. Following this, we used term-frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) to avoid common errors that hinder the independent separation and grouping of keywords. By weighing words for information retrieval [64], the TF-IDF approach allows us to figure out the most frequent words in all documents, and those most likely to be indistinguishable to a specific topic group [65]. By using TF-IDF scores as a baseline, we extracted several words, including ginseng, wild ginseng, wild cultivated ginseng, Panax ginseng, ginsenoside, and antioxidant activities, to increase the independent topic distributions.
The number of topics in modelling is a major issue as it affects data interpretation [60]. The number of topics should be determined by focusing on the possibilities of interpretation of the analytical results and research purposes, rather than relying on probability values alone. During analysis, researchers run the LDA process and choose the number of topics, their iterations, α, β, and other values until topics are distinguishably divided [28]. In this regard, the researchers used a social network analysis software, NetMiner 4 [66]. For reasonable distributions of topic models, this study chose a set of parameters that affect the structure of word and topic distributions [60] with α = 0.01, β = 0.001, and iteration = 10,000 times. After specifying five topics, all words in the papers were automatically calculated and arranged in each topic in descending order of their values, based on the main keyword of each topic with the highest probability. Further, linear regression analysis was conducted to identify the annual research trends in major topics.

5. Results

5.1. Article Distribution

The results indicate significant differences in the research on WSG, geographical imbalance (Figure 2), and specific period upsurge (Figure 3). First, the trends in publishing reveal three major countries, namely the Republic of Korea (56), China (25), and the USA (15), that have been actively conducting research on WSG. Approximately 73% of the total studies were published in the Republic of Korea and China. On the contrary, other countries such as Russia (3), Canada (2), and New Zealand (1) conducted relatively few studies on WSG. Figure 3 displays the fluctuation in the number of WSG studies since the first publication in 1982. After two reports in the 1980s, no article was published in the 1990s. The articles were published again between 2000 and 2001. The number of published articles increased from 2004. Most articles were published in the last 15 years. More than 50% of the studies were published after 2016, and most studies were published in 2019.
Regarding WSG species, more than 65% of the selected articles investigated P. ginseng Meyer, followed by P. quinquefolius L. (18%) and P. notoginseng (1%) (Figure 4a). Only 5% of the publications belonged to the field of social science, whereas 95% of them belonged to the field of natural science (Figure 4b). The results indicate a lack of social science approach in WSG studies. Most WSG publications are based on the natural science approach and methodology for examining the components of WSG and their medicinal effects. Only a total of five studies applied social science aspects to WSG studies (Figure 4b). Burkhart et al. [67] conducted mixed-method studies on the perspective of stakeholders on federal government conservation efforts such as Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), and they concluded that the top-down regulatory approach has limitations on conserving WSG in Pennsylvania [67]. McGraw et al. [35] reviewed scientific findings to understand how environmental changes and direct and indirect interactions with humans affect WSG in North America [35]. Schmidt et al. [68] applied geoadditive regression models to investigate the joint effects of environmental and social factors on ginseng harvest in the USA. The study reports that an overexploitation of WSG violates federal regulation, and a high correlation exists between harvesting and poverty [68]. Chamberlain et al. [69] examined the sociocultural, economic, and ecological elements of sustainable management of NTFPs, and they analyzed many medicinal species in the USA, including WSG. The review concluded that much more research and development is needed to ensure the long-term sustainability of NTFPs, their cultural values, and recognition of economic potential [69]. Jiang and Tian [70] investigated the saponin content in forests using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and they found that the saponin content of ginseng from Chinese forests is significantly different, suggesting policy support such as investment and optimization of marketing models to promote them [70].

5.2. Characteristics of Wild-Simulated Ginseng Research

The research analyzed WSG study areas by classifying them into four categories, namely growth conditions, components, effects on the environment, and effects on animals/humans. In the growth conditions category, site conditions (19) have been mostly studied, followed by growth (8), microstructure (7), genetic diversity (6), and photosynthesis (4) (Figure 5a). Among WSG components, most WSG articles covered ginsenoside (26), genome (7), and phenolic compounds (3) (Figure 5b). Regarding the effects of WSG, anti-oxidation (11) and anti-cancer (5) effects have been mostly examined. Most of the anti-oxidant and anti-cancer studies were related to ginsenoside. Lastly, biodiversity (5) was the hottest topic in the environmental effects of WSG (Figure 5c,d).

5.3. Keyword Frequency

Table 2 shows the frequency of the top 25 keywords out of a total of 481 keywords from the 115 selected articles. The top keywords are mostly ginseng types or species, such as Asian ginseng species, P. ginseng (49). As 11 anti-oxidation studies have been conducted (Figure 5c), the relevant keyword, antioxidant activity, was designated with the fifth-highest keyword frequency. However, since frequency analysis alone has limits to discovering the relationship between semantic structures and context of WSG research, it is necessary to look at the knowledge structure of the study through topic modelling analysis.

5.4. Topic Analysis

As a result of topic modelling, five topics (Table 3) were derived from the large keyword network (Figure 6). The five topics included 336 keywords, excluding keywords with high TF-IDF scores as mentioned in the method Section 4.4 Topic Modelling. Table 3 displays the ranks of keywords according to the topic. Each topic was named depending on the characteristics of extracted keywords. Topic A was named “Medicinal effects”, and it included keywords on the medical and pharmacological functions of WSG, such as medicinal plant, insulin, Chinese medicine, Tuina, and chronic fatigue syndrome. The studies related to Topic A indicate the wide use of WSG for various medicinal purposes, and they investigated methodologies to maintain or enhance the medicinal efficacy of WSG [71,72]. Furthermore, the remedial effects of WSG have been detected focusing on polyacetylene compounds, and many studies have compared WSG with other medicinal herbs [8,73]. Topic B was named “Metabolite analysis”, including relevant keywords such as ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-TOF-MS), HPLC, bioreactor culture, discrimination model, quantitative analysis, orthogonal partial least squared-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA), and vacuum freeze-drying. These keywords are related to the identification and quantification of WSG ingredients. HPLC, UPLC-Q-TOF-MS, and OPLS-DA are analytical techniques and methods to separate, identify, and quantify each component of WSG [74]. OPLS-DA, in particular, was used as a statistical technique to find the differences in components between different experimental groups by maximizing data visualization of metabolites in WSG [75]. Topic C was “Genetic diversity”, which consisted of keywords such as genetic diversity, RAPD, 16S rDNA, UPGMA, genetic differentiation, Illumina MiSeq sequencing, and transcriptome. The terms cell, gene, and microunits belonged to Topic C. Various attempts have been made to identify genetic diversity across a wide variety of WSG species [76,77,78]. Particularly, keywords shown in Topic C (Table 3), such as RAPD, ISSR, and de novo RNA sequencing, are related to gene sequencing. Topic D was named “Cultivation conditions”, which comprises keywords such as plant conservation, harvest, climate change, understory ginseng, photosynthesis, NTFPs, restoration ecology, endangered species, suitable ecological area, forest farming, winter warming, frost, and demography. Topic D focused on growth, cultivation, and cultivation environment. The demand for forest products is increasing worldwide [79], and the harvest pressure on ginseng is also increasing [68]. Along with the increase in the demand for WSG, several studies have investigated the environmental variables to predict the probability of ginseng growth using a species distribution model [68]. Furthermore, studies have been conducted on the ecology and conservation of WSG. Direct and indirect interacting threats, such as deer browsing, harvest, and climate change, and the long-term persistence of WSG have been examined based on the ecological and cultivation characteristics of WSG [35]. Lastly, Topic E was “Bioactive compounds”, which included various bioactive compounds directly or indirectly related to WSG. Figure 7 indicates the structure of Topic E with three sub-clusters of bioactive compounds. The first sub-cluster contains keywords related to antimicrobial compounds such as ginseng pathogens, Burkholderia stabilis, bacterial endophyte, and biocontrol. B. stabilis is a bacterial endophyte isolated from WSG. B. stabilis EB159 is used as a biocontrol agent against ginseng pathogens [71]. The second sub-cluster includes the keywords related to brain health compounds such as prefrontal cortex, schizophrenia, and phencyclidine. The third sub-cluster includes the keywords related to antioxidant compounds such as DPPH radicals, kaempferol, and quercetin. Quercetin and kaempferol are the antioxidant compounds found in wild ginseng leaves [80].

6. Discussion

6.1. Studies on Wild-Simulated Ginseng by Country

The overall aggregation and examination of topics by country were analyzed (Figure 7). Keywords from WSG articles published for approximately 40 years, including no publication in 11 years from 1989 to 1999, were evenly distributed into five topics, namely Topic A (19.05%), Topic B (22.02%), Topic C (19.64%), Topic D (19.05%), and Topic E (20.24%).
Studies on WSG were mainly conducted in three countries, namely the Republic of Korea, China, and the USA (Figure 2). WSG studies in the Republic of Korea were evenly distributed into all topics, but studies from China and the USA were conducted on some dominant topics. Chinese researchers have focused more on Topic A, “Medicinal effects”, but less on Topic D, “Cultivation conditions”. On the other hand, the USA shows an opposite pattern, with more studies on Topic D, “Cultivation conditions”.
The Republic of Korea conducted the most number of studies on WSG based on a long history of WSG cultivation, since many studies have evaluated the therapeutic potency and cultivation technology of WSG since the first century [29]. Studies on Topic A (medicinal effects) in the Republic of Korea mainly focused on traditional medicinal remedies, including complementary and alternative medicine, such as pharmacopuncture. These studies evaluated the effects of WSG on patients with klatskin tumor [81], cancer [48], and obesity [7]. Topic B (Metabolite analysis) papers were related to the antioxidant effects of ginseng by analyzing the bioprocessing of saponins [82]. Few studies have reviewed microbial ginsenosides that can be used as special additives in the food and medicinal industry [83]. Several papers examined the genetic diversity (Topic C) of WSG populations. Specifically, the studies evaluated genetic differences [84], functional compounds [73], and genetic relationships among different types of cultivated ginseng [78]. Few studies have investigated the cultivation conditions (Topic D), and they indicate significant values of effective environments for ginseng growth, such as shade, soil, photosynthesis [85], mountain conditions [86], and forest types [87]. Lastly, most papers from the Republic of Korea included keywords on bioactive compounds (Topic E). The efficacy of WSG on the health of both humans and livestock has been highlighted through experiments. For instance, researchers found that WSG can be used as a potential biocontrol agent against some chemicals [71], and it possesses an ability to protect hormones for anti-apoptosis [28,88].
Next, the second-largest number of WSG studies was conducted in China (Figure 3). Publications on WSG in China were mainly related to “Medicinal effects” (Topic A) and “Metabolite analysis” (Topic B). The Chinese have been consuming ginseng since thousands of years as a traditional herbal medicine due to its medicinal effects [76,89]. Due its high medicinal value (Topic A), ginseng has been cultivated in large areas in China. Many studies have been conducted on its medicinal basis and application [90,91]. Based on advanced research on the noteworthy medicinal effects of ginseng, such as modulation of immune functions and metabolic processes, anti-stress activity, and improvement of the memory process, various preparations of ginseng have been approved through metabolite analysis (Topic B) for clinical application in China [91].
Lastly, the research on WSG in the USA is shown in Figure 7. A number of studies have been conducted on “Cultivation conditions”, classified as Topic D. For nearly 300 years, American ginseng has been harvested in large quantities in eastern and central North America, and it has been exported to China [18,92]. In 1975, however, American ginseng was listed in the CITES Appendix II [35,93]. All species listed in Appendix II are considered susceptible to extinction without trade control, and in the case of American ginseng, there were concerns about existing high yields [35]. Since American ginseng was listed in Appendix II of CITES, early research on the growth and ecology of ginseng population was promoted, which can be explained as an opportunity to support many studies on WSG cultivation environment in the USA [32,94,95]. Moreover, in recent years, American ginseng has been recommended as a candidate for agroforestry crops that can receive premium prices through forest farming practices, especially the “wild-simulated” approach [18]. The production of WSG provides an economic benefit for forest landowners for generating short-term income. Several studies have identified a suitable environment for cultivating WSG [18,92].

6.2. Changing Topic Trends of Wild-Simulated Ginseng Studies

This study analyzed the changing trends in the share of topics over time by categorizing the results over five-year-periods (Figure 8). Before 2005 (Period 1), Topic E, “Bioactive compounds”, was the least studied topic (11.76%), and other topics had a similar share. In Period 2, however, Topic A, “Medicinal effects”, was prominent (30.95%) and Topic C, “Genetic diversity”, also received more attention with an increase of more than 6%. However, studies on Topic B, “Metabolite analysis”, decreased significantly (9.52%). In Period 3, the proportion of studies on “Cultivation conditions”, Topic D, increased by 10% (31.71%). On the other hand, the proportion of studies dealing with Topic A, “Medicinal effects”, decreased from 30.95% (Period 2) to 13.41% (Period 3). Recently, Topic E, “Bioactive compounds”, became the most prominent research area in Period 4 (24.72%), but the proportion of studies on Topic D declined. A decrease in the ratio of topic groups does not indicate a decrease in the number of keywords. Both the number of articles and keywords on WSG increased over time (Figure 3 and Figure 8). Figure 8 shows changes in the relatively dominant topics of keywords along with the ratio values.
We observed that in the beginning of WSG research, researchers were interested in the medicinal effects, metabolite analysis, genetic diversity, and cultivation conditions of WSG. However, significant differences were observed in Periods 2 and 3. In Period 2, most studies were conducted on “Medicinal effects”, and in Period 3, most studies were conducted on “cultivation conditions” (more than 30%). In Period 4, the study focus changed to “metabolite analysis” and “bioactive compounds”. The percentage and weight of the five topics changed in every period. Interestingly, the ratio of studies on bioactive compounds increased continuously while trends of other topics changed in an irregular pattern over time. The change in the ratio of dominant research topics from medicinal effects and cultivation conditions to metabolite analysis and bioactive compounds indicates a shift in research trends from biological and ecological to bioactive metabolite evaluation of WSG. The former includes biological growth, suitable cultivation, and medicinal components of WSG. It concentrates on the interaction between WSG and their cultivation environment. The latter includes identifying the functions of WSG components. Some studies have conducted a detailed analysis of WSG components, including the examination of single compounds of WSG such as kaempferol and quercetin. This approach is deeply related to the application of WSG in treating human diseases. It offers evidence of the contribution of WSG to enhance human health. The evidence is closely linked with value addition [82] in the utilization of WSG. As the global interests in ginseng consumption increase in the market of health foods [94,96], this trend highlights a hidden potential for the expansion of the industrial market of WSG with a focus on bioactive metabolite traits for human wellbeing.

7. Conclusions

This study explored WSG research trends using systematic review and topic modelling. The systematic review approach allowed us to examine the existing literature thoroughly with an obvious, repeatable, and minimal bias process to search, identify, select, evaluate, and aggregate research evidence. Topic modelling allows us to analyze what topics have been conducted and how the topic has changed recently. We found that WSG studies mostly targeted ginsenoside (Figure 5b) and its effects on humans/animals (Figure 5c), the top keywords were related to anti-oxidation (Table 2), and research trends varied by country (Figure 7) and time period (Figure 8). Moreover, the research focus changed from the biological properties of WSG and its cultivation conditions to the precise identification and characterization of the bioactive metabolites of WSG. This change indicates an increased academic interest in the value-added utilization of WSG.
Considering the findings of this study, some suggestions are recommended for future studies on WSG. First, future studies need to consider diverse approaches. Most studies on WSG examined the effects of WSG in natural science (Figure 4b and Figure 5c). For understanding and supporting the WSG industry and market, more studies should be conducted with a social science approach, including value chain analysis, household survey, consumer preference, and trade policy. Additionally, a meta-analysis is necessary to statistically analyze the collected data according to subjects, as our results provided specific subject categories (Figure 5c,d). Meta-analysis combines individual findings into a large study and then proves them statistically. Meta-analysis, starting from anti-oxidant, -cancer, and -obesity studies, with a relatively sufficient sample size and more data can precisely analyze the trends. Theoretically, only two or three studies are sufficient to conduct a meta-analysis; however, understanding the statistical power of meta-analysis is most important [95].
Although this systematic approach identified the important keywords and research trends, this study had some limitations. First, our study showed a global trend using only English-written papers due to language barriers, although the Republic of Korea and China (Figure 2) are the two major countries. For a more comprehensive study, future research needs to include WSG research papers written in local languages. Moreover, morpheme analysis determines the quality of the analysis in topical modelling analysis. To overcome the disadvantages of unsupervised learning of LDA techniques and to enhance the appropriateness of topics, future studies should apply various transformed techniques and compare the results using new methodologies, such as supervised LDA, extended to conduct supervised learning, and hierarchical LDA, extended to allow multiple layers of the subject structure. Despite these limitations, the study offered dominant research keywords and topic categories of WSG studies. These results will contribute to understanding the trend of WSG research and designing future research on WSG.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S. and M.S.P.; methodology, S.S. and M.S.P.; software, S.S.; formal analysis, S.S., M.S.P., H.L. (Hansol Lee), H.L. (Haeun Lee), S.L., T.H.K., and H.J.K.; data curation, S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S., H.L., H.L., S.L., and T.H.K.; writing—review and editing, M.S.P. and H.J.K.; visualization, S.S.; supervision, M.S.P.; project administration, M.S.P.; funding acquisition, M.S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Creative-Pioneering Researchers Program through Seoul National University (SNU).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Search Query.
Table A1. Search Query.
DatabaseSearch Query
SCOPUSTITLE-ABS-KEY (“wild ginseng” OR “wild American ginseng” OR “wild panax ginseng” OR “wild Asian ginseng” OR “wild Asiatic ginseng” OR “wild Chinese ginseng” OR “wild Korean ginseng” OR “wild oriental ginseng” OR “forest ginseng” OR “forest American ginseng” OR “forest panax ginseng” OR “forest Asian ginseng” OR “forest Asiatic ginseng” OR “forest Chinese ginseng” OR “forest Korean ginseng” OR “forest oriental ginseng” OR “wild-simulated ginseng” OR “mountain cultivated ginseng” OR “forest cultivated ginseng” OR “wild-simulated ginseng” OR “wood cultivated ginseng”)
Web of ScienceTS (“wild ginseng” OR “wild American ginseng” OR “wild panax ginseng” OR “wild Asian ginseng” OR “wild Asiatic ginseng” OR “wild Chinese ginseng” OR “wild Korean ginseng” OR “wild oriental ginseng” OR “forest ginseng” OR “forest American ginseng” OR “forest panax ginseng” OR “forest Asian ginseng” OR “forest Asiatic ginseng” OR “forest Chinese ginseng” OR “forest Korean ginseng” OR “forest oriental ginseng” OR “wild-simulated ginseng” OR “mountain cultivated ginseng” OR “forest cultivated ginseng” OR “wild-simulated ginseng” OR “wood cultivated ginseng”)

References

  1. Yang, B.W.; Lee, J.B.; Lee, J.M.; Jo, M.S.; Byun, J.K.; Kim, H.C.; Ko, S.K. The comparison of seasonal ginsenoside composition contents in korean wild simulated ginseng (Panax ginseng) which were cultivated in different areas and various ages. Nat. Prod. Sci. 2019, 25, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nah, S.Y. Ginseng; Recent advances and trends. J. Ginseng Res. 1997, 21, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  3. Korea Forest Service. Dictionary of Forest and Forestry. Available online: https://www.forest.go.kr/kfsweb/kfi/kfs/mwd/selectMtstWordDictionary.do?pageIndex=1&pageUnit=10&wrdSn=4209&searchWord=&searchType=&wrdType=0&searchWrd=산양삼&mn=NKFS_04_07_01&orgId= (accessed on 13 April 2021).
  4. American ginseng: Non-Detriment Findings—Canada.ca. Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/convention-international-trade-endangered-species/non-detriment-findings/american-ginseng.html#_02 (accessed on 13 April 2021).
  5. United States Department of the Interior. General Advise for the Export of Wild and Wild-Simulated American Ginseng. 2018, p. 15. Available online: http://www.ahpa.org/Portals/0/PDFs/2018%20PDS/18_0926_FWS_2017_Wild_Ginseng_Sustainable_Harvest.pdf (accessed on 20 May 2021).
  6. Nam, K.Y. Clinical applications and efficacy of Korean ginseng. J. Ginseng Res. 2002, 26, 111–131. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mollah, M.L.; Kim, G.; Moon, H.; Chung, S.; Cheon, Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, K. Antiobesity effects of wild ginseng (Panax ginseng CA Meyer) mediated by PPAR-γ, GLUT4 and LPL in ob/ob mice. Phyther. Res. An Int. J. Devoted to Pharmacol. Toxicol. Eval. Nat. Prod. Deriv. 2009, 23, 220–225. [Google Scholar]
  8. Taehan, Y.; Jungsuk, Y.; Hwiyong, L.; Beomyong, S.; Lakhyung, K.; Jungdu, R.; Jinchul, S.; Sungtaek, L. Comparing the effects of distilled Rehmannia glutinosa, Wild Ginseng and Astragali Radix pharmacopuncture with heart rate variability (HRV): A randomized, sham-controlled and double-blind clinical trial. J. Acupunct. Meridian Stud. 2009, 2, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Shin, I.S.; Kim, D.H.; Jang, E.Y.; Kim, H.Y.; Yoo, H.S. Anti-fatigue properties of cultivated wild ginseng distilled extract and tts active component panaxydol in rats. J. Pharmacopunct. 2019, 22, 68. [Google Scholar]
  10. An, K.S.; Choi, Y.O.; Lee, S.M.; Ryu, H.Y.; Kang, S.J.; Yeon, Y.; Kim, Y.R.; Lee, J.G.; Kim, C.J.; Kang, B.J. Ginsenosides Rg5 and Rk1 enriched cultured wild ginseng root extract bioconversion of pediococcus pentosaceus HLJG0702: Effect on scopolamine-induced memory dysfunction in mice. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Tu, T.T.; Sharma, N.; Shin, E.J.; Tran, H.Q.; Lee, Y.J.; Nah, S.Y.; Tran, H.P.; Jeong, J.H.; Ko, S.K.; Byun, J.K. Treatment with mountain-cultivated ginseng alleviates trimethyltin-induced cognitive impairments in mice via IL-6-dependent JAK2/STAT3/ERK signaling. Planta Med. 2017, 83, 1342–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bae, K.; Kim, E.; Choi, J.J.; Kim, M.K.; Yoo, H.S. The effectiveness of anticancer traditional Korean medicine treatment on the survival in patients with lung, breast, gastric, colorectal, hepatic, uterine, or ovarian cancer: A prospective cohort study protocol. Medicine 2018, 97, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hu, J.; Jiao, J.; Wang, Y.; Gao, M.; Lu, Z.; Yang, F.; Hu, C.; Song, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Z. Effect of extract from ginseng rust rot on the inhibition of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro. Micron 2019, 124, 102710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hong, J.Y.; Shin, S.R.; Bae, M.J.; Bae, J.S.; Lee, I.C.; Kwon, O.J.; Jung, J.W.; Kim, Y.H.; Kim, T.H. Pancreatic lipase inhibitors isolated from the leaves of cultivated mountain ginseng (Panax ginseng). Korean J. Food Preserv. 2010, 17, 727–732. [Google Scholar]
  15. Park, C.K.; Kwak, Y.S.; Hwang, M.S.; Kim, S.C.; Do, J.H. Current status of ginseng (red ginseng) products in market of health functional food. Korean Ginseng Res. Ind. 2007, 1, 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  16. Korea Forest Service. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gil, J.; Um, Y.; Byun, J.K.; Chung, J.W.; Lee, Y.; Chung, C.M. Genetic diversity analysis of wood-cultivated ginseng using simple sequence repeat Markers. Korean J. Med. Crop Sci. 2017, 25, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Burkhart, E.P. American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) floristic associations in Pennsylvania: Guidance for identifying calcium-rich forest farming sites. Agrofor. Syst. 2013, 87, 1157–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McGraw, J.B.; Furedi, M.A.; Maiers, K.; Carroll, C.; Kauffman, G.; Lubbers, A.; Wolf, J.; Anderson, R.C.; Anderson, M.R.; Wilcox, B. Berry ripening and harvest season in wild American ginseng. Northeast. Nat. 2005, 12, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lim, W.; Mudge, K.W.; Weston, L.A. Utilization of RAPD markers to assess genetic diversity of wild populations of North American ginseng (Panax quinquefolium). Planta Med. 2007, 73, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kim, K.; Um, Y.; Jeong, D.H.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, M.J.; Jeon, K.S. The correlation between growth characteristics and location environment of wild-simulated ginseng (Panax ginseng CA Meyer). Korean J. Plant Resour. 2019, 32, 463–470. [Google Scholar]
  22. Grimshaw, J.M.; Russell, I.T. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: A systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 1993, 342, 1317–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, B.S.; Lee, J.Y. Keyword Network Analysis on Research Trends on the Software Education. Korean Assoc. Learn. Curric. Instr. 2019, 19, 385–405. [Google Scholar]
  24. Shin, S.; Soe, K.T.; Lee, H.; Kim, T.H.; Lee, S.; Park, M.S. A systematic map of agroforestry research focusing on ecosystem services in the Asia-Pacific Region. Forests 2020, 11, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Lee, N.H.; Son, C.G. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of ginseng. J. Acupunct. Meridian Stud. 2011, 4, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Buettner, C.; Yeh, G.Y.; Phillips, R.S.; Mittleman, M.A.; Kaptchuk, T.J. Systematic review of the effects of ginseng on cardiovascular risk factors. Ann. Pharmacother. 2006, 40, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kim, M.; Kim, C.; Kim, H. Research trends of connected education from kindergarten to elementary school from 2006 to 2011. J. Korea Open Assoc. Early Child. Educ. 2012, 17, 503–523. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jelodar, H.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, C.; Feng, X.; Jiang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhao, L. Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) and topic modeling: Models, applications, a survey. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2019, 78, 15169–15211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Artyukova, E.V.; Kozyrenko, M.M.; Koren, O.G.; Muzarok, T.I.; Reunova, G.D.; Zhuravlev, Y.N. RAPD and allozyme analysis of genetic diversity in Panax ginseng CA Meyer and P. quinquefolius L. Russ. J. Genet. 2004, 40, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Park, H.J.; Kim, D.H.; Park, S.J.; Kim, J.M.; Ryu, J.H. Ginseng in traditional herbal prescriptions. J. Ginseng Res. 2012, 36, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lee, F.C. An Introduction to Korean Ginseng: The Elixir of Life; Korea Ginseng & Tobacco Research Institute: Daejeon, Korea, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bai, D.; Brandle, J.; Reeleder, R. Genetic diversity in North American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) grown in Ontario detected by RAPD analysis. Genome 1997, 40, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Davis, J.; Persons, W.S. Growing and Marketing Ginseng, Goldenseal and Other Woodland Medicinals; New Society Publishers: Gabriola Island, BC, Canada, 2014; ISBN 1550925636. [Google Scholar]
  34. Taylor, D.A. Ginseng, the Divine Root; Algonquin Books: Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 2006; ISBN 1565124014. [Google Scholar]
  35. McGraw, J.B.; Lubbers, A.E.; Van der Voort, M.; Mooney, E.H.; Furedi, M.A.; Souther, S.; Turner, J.B.; Chandler, J. Ecology and conservation of ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) in a changing world. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2013, 1286, 62–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yong, S.H.; Seo, Y.R.; Kim, H.G.; Park, D.J.; Seol, Y.; Choi, E.; Hong, J.H.; Choi, M.S. Growth characteristics and saponin content of mountain-cultivated ginseng (Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer) according to seed-sowing method suitable for cultivation under forest. Forest Sci. Technol. 2020, 16, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Choi, Y.E.; Kim, Y.S.; Yi, M.J.; Park, W.G.; Yi, J.S.; Chun, S.R.; Han, S.S.; Lee, S.J. Physiological and chemical characteristics of field-and mountain-cultivated ginseng roots. J. Plant Biol. 2007, 50, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. National Institute of Forest Science. Standard Guideline for Wild Simulated Ginseng Cultivation; Seoul. 2018. Available online: https://nifos.forest.go.kr/kfsweb/cop/bbs/selectBoardArticle.do;jsessionid=RJBgvqF9aWNBxbHLrgoXmuaG3JWpLSSInTrzeAea1TbE7c464ejdi2rPakZQQ4PL.frswas02_servlet_engine5?nttId=3130499&bbsId=BBSMSTR_1036&pageUnit=10&pageIndex=17&searchtitle=title&searchcont=&searchkey=&searchwriter=&searchWrd=&ctgryLrcls=CTGRY150&ctgryMdcls=&ctgrySmcls=&ntcStartDt=&ntcEndDt=&mn=UKFR_03_03&orgId=kfri (accessed on 20 May 2021).
  39. Korea Forest Service. Survey Report of Wild-Simulated Ginseng Production; Daejeon. 2020. Available online: https://www.forest.go.kr/kfsweb/kfi/kfs/cms/cmsView.do?mn=NKFS_02_01_07_03_01&cmsId=FC_000826. (accessed on 20 May 2021).
  40. Um, Y.; Eo, H.J.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, K.; Jeon, K.S.; Jeong, J.B. Wild simulated ginseng activates mouse macrophage, RAW264. 7 cells through TRL2/4-dependent activation of MAPK, NF-κB and PI3K/AKT pathways. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 263, 113218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, M.H.; Choi, S.W.; Kim, E.J. Differential anti-carcinogenic effect of mountain cultivated ginseng and ginseng on mouse skin carcinogenesis. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 41, 462–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kim, M.W.; Lee, E.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Park, T.S.; Cho, Y.J. Beauty food activities of wild-cultivated ginseng (Panax ginseng CA Meyer) ground part. J. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2018, 61, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ok, S.; Kang, J.S.; Kim, K.M. Testicular antioxidant mechanism of cultivated wild ginseng extracts. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 2016, 12, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ahn, G.; Park, C.H.; Lee, E.O.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, K.H.; Rhee, Y.H.; Jang, Y.S.; Kim, S.T.; Kim, S.H. Apoptotic effect of ethanol extracts of Bojungbangamtang and Acidic Polysaccharide of Korea Red Ginseng in a MCF7/adR multidrug-resistance breast cancer cells. Yakhak Hoeji 2006, 50, 272–277. [Google Scholar]
  45. Pyo, J.S.; Kim, H.H.; Kim, K.M.; Kang, J.S. Amelioration of dry eye syndrome by oral administration of cultivated wild ginseng extract. Bangladesh J. Pharmacol. 2019, 14, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mollah, M.L.; Cheon, Y.P.; In, J.G.; Yang, D.C.; Kim, Y.C.; Song, J.C.; Kim, K.S. Inhibitory effects of cultivated wild ginseng on the differentiation of 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes. J. Ginseng Res. 2011, 35, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Moon, J.N.; Kim, J.K.; Lee, S.; Kwon, J.H. Antihypertensive effects of Korean wild simulated ginseng (Sanyangsam) extracts in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 28, 1563–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lee, J.H.; Kwon, K.R.; Cho, C.K.; Han, S.S.R.; Yoo, H.S. Advanced cancer cases treated with cultivated wild ginseng phamacopuncture. J. Acupunct. Meridian Stud. 2010, 3, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Chowdhury, M.D.E.K.; Jeon, J.; Rim, S.O.; Park, Y.H.; Lee, S.K.; Bae, H. Composition, diversity and bioactivity of culturable bacterial endophytes in mountain-cultivated ginseng in Korea. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Sun, H.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Liu, N.; Liu, Z.; Lv, L.; Shao, C.; Guan, Y.; Ma, L.; Li, M. Distinct leaf litter drive the fungal communities in Panax ginseng-growing soil. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 104, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, H.; Wang, Q.; Liu, N.; Li, L.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y. Effects of different leaf litters on the physicochemical properties and bacterial communities in Panax ginseng-growing soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 111, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chowdhury, M.D.E.K.; Jeon, J.; Rim, S.O.; Park, Y.H.; Lee, S.K.; Bae, H. Publisher Correction: Composition, diversity and bioactivity of culturable bacterial endophytes in mountain-cultivated ginseng in Korea. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kwon, K.R.; Park, W.P.; Kang, W.M.; Jeon, E.; Jang, J.H. Retracted: Identification and analysis of differentially expressed genes in mountain cultivated ginseng and mountain wild ginseng. J. Acupunct. Meridian Stud. 2011, 4, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Jeong, B.G.; Jung, G.R.; Kim, M.S.; Moon, H.G.; Park, S.J.; Chun, J. Ginsenoside contents and antioxidant activities of cultivated mountain ginseng (Panax ginseng CA Meyer) with different ages. Korean J. Food Preserv 2019, 26, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Lee, G.; Choi, G.S.; Lee, J.Y.; Yun, S.J.; Kim, W.; Lee, H.; Baik, M.Y.; Hwang, J.K. Proximate Analysis and Antioxidant Activity of Cultivated Wild Panax ginseng. Food Eng. Prog. 2017, 21, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Han, Y.J.; Kwon, K.R.; Cha, B.C.; Kwon, O. Component analysis of cultivated ginseng, cultivated wild ginseng, and natural wild ginseng by structural parts using HPLC method. J. Korean Inst. Herb. Acupunct. 2007, 10, 37–53. [Google Scholar]
  57. Lee, D.Y.; Cho, J.G.; Lee, M.K.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, Y.H.; Yang, D.C.; Baek, N.I. Discrimination of Panax ginseng roots cultivated in different areas in Korea using HPLC-ELSD and principal component analysis. J. Ginseng Res. 2011, 35, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kroeze, J.H.; Matthee, M.C.; Bothma, T.J.D. Differentiating between data-mining and text-mining terminology. SA J. Inf. Manag. 2004, 6, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tan, A.-H. Text mining: The state of the art and the challenges. In Proceedings of the PAKDD 1999 Workshop on Knowledge Disocovery from Advanced Databases, Beijing, China, 26–28 April 1999; Citeseer: University Park, PA, USA, 1999; Volume 8, pp. 65–70. Available online: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.132.6973&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed on 20 May 2021).
  60. Maier, D.; Waldherr, A.; Miltner, P.; Wiedemann, G.; Niekler, A.; Keinert, A.; Pfetsch, B.; Heyer, G.; Reber, U.; Häussler, T. Applying LDA topic modeling in communication research: Toward a valid and reliable methodology. Commun. Methods Meas. 2018, 12, 93–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lee, S.-S. A study on the application of topic modeling for the book report text. J. Korean Libr. Inf. Sci. Soc. 2016, 47, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  62. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Int. J. Surg. 2010, 8, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Littell, J.H.; Corcoran, J.; Pillai, V. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2008; ISBN 0195326547. [Google Scholar]
  64. Salton, G.; Harman, D. Information Retrieval; John Wiley and Sons Ltd: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003; pp. 858–863. ISBN 0470864125. [Google Scholar]
  65. Ramos, J. Using tf-idf to determine word relevance in document queries. Proceedings of the First Instructional Conference on Machine Learning; Citeseer, 2003; pp. 29–48. Available online: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.121.1424&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed on 20 May 2021).
  66. Cyram. Cyram Netminer 4.1. Seoul Cyram 2013. Available online: http://www.cyram.com/library/library01.jsp (accessed on 20 May 2021).
  67. Burkhart, E.P.; Jacobson, M.G.; Finley, J. A case study of stakeholder perspective and experience with wild American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) conservation efforts in Pennsylvania, USA: Limitations to a CITES driven, top-down regulatory approach. Biodivers. Conserv. 2012, 21, 3657–3679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Schmidt, J.P.; Cruse-Sanders, J.; Chamberlain, J.L.; Ferreira, S.; Young, J.A. Explaining harvests of wild-harvested herbaceous plants: American ginseng as a case study. Biol. Conserv. 2019, 231, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chamberlain, J.; Small, C.; Baumflek, M. Sustainable forest management for nontimber products. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Jiang, X.; Tian, Z. Study on Ginsenoside Nutrition Content of Forest Ginseng and Factors of Forestry Economic Grow. Arch. Latinoam. Nutricion 2020, 70, 127–134. [Google Scholar]
  71. Kim, H.; Rim, S.O.; Bae, H. Antimicrobial potential of metabolites extracted from ginseng bacterial endophyte Burkholderia stabilis against ginseng pathogens. Biol. Control. 2019, 128, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Beon, M.S.; Park, J.H.; Kang, H.M.; Cho, S.J.; Kim, H. Geographic information system-based identification of suitable cultivation sites for wood-cultivated ginseng. J. Ginseng Res. 2013, 37, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Shin, I.S.; Jo, E.; Jang, I.S.; Yoo, H.S. Quantitative analyses of the functional constituents in SanYangSam and SanYangSanSam. J. Pharmacopunct. 2017, 20, 274. [Google Scholar]
  74. Wang, J.; Leung, C.; Ho, H.; Chai, S.; Yau, L.; Zhao, Z.; Jiang, Z. Quantitative comparison of ginsenosides and polyacetylenes in wild and cultivated American ginseng. Chem. Biodivers. 2010, 7, 975–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Xu, X.; Xu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, M.; Liu, H.; Gao, Y.; Xue, X.; Xiong, H.; Lin, R. Chemical comparison of two drying methods of mountain cultivated ginseng by UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS and multivariate statistical analysis. Molecules 2017, 22, 717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Li, S.; Li, J.; Yang, X.L.; Cheng, Z.; Zhang, W.J. Genetic diversity and differentiation of cultivated ginseng (Panax ginseng CA Meyer) populations in North-east China revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2011, 58, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cruse-Sanders, J.M.; Hamrick, J.L. Genetic diversity in harvested and protected populations of wild American ginseng, Panax quinquefolius L. (Araliaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2004, 91, 540–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Hwang, H.Z.; Yeon, M.J.; Seong, J.Y.; Park, H.Y.; Kim, S.O.; Jeon, H.W.; Kim, K.C.; Choi, K.J.; Lee, Y.J.; Suh, D.S. Genetic variations in Korean wild ginsengs and their genetic relationships. Korean J. Genet. 2006, 28, 163–169. [Google Scholar]
  79. Schippmann, U.; Leaman, D.J.; Cunningham, A.B. Impact of Cultivation and Gathering of Medicinal Plants on Biodiversity: Global Trends and Issues. In Biodiversity and the Ecosystem Approach in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  80. Jung, C.H.; Seog, H.M.; Choi, I.W.; Cho, H.Y. Antioxidant activities of cultivated and wild Korean ginseng leaves. Food Chem. 2005, 92, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Han, J.B.; Im, C.R.; Lee, J.W.; Kim, S.S.; Seong, S. A case of inoperable klatskin tumor showing response to wild ginseng pharmacopuncture. Orient. Pharm. Exp. Med. 2013, 13, 235–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Murthy, H.N.; Georgiev, M.I.; Kim, Y.S.; Jeong, C.S.; Kim, S.J.; Park, S.Y.; Paek, K.Y. Ginsenosides: Prospective for sustainable biotechnological production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 6243–6254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Eom, S.J.; Kim, K.T.; Paik, H.D. Microbial bioconversion of ginsenosides in Panax ginseng and their improved bioactivities. Food Rev. Int. 2018, 34, 698–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jang, W.; Jang, Y.; Kim, N.H.; Waminal, N.E.; Kim, Y.C.; Lee, J.W.; Yang, T.J. Genetic diversity among cultivated and wild Panax ginseng populations revealed by high-resolution microsatellite markers. J. Ginseng Res. 2020, 44, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Suh, H.; Seo, S.M.; Woo, S.Y.; Lee, D.S. Forest cultivated ginseng in Korea: All cure medicinal plants. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 5331–5336. [Google Scholar]
  86. Suh, H.; Seo, S.M.; Lee, D.-S.; Woo, S.Y. Net photosynthesis of Panax ginseng on the different age in mountain area, Korea. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 5933–5935. [Google Scholar]
  87. Woo, S.Y.; Lee, D.S.; Kim, P.G. Growth and eco-physiological characteristics of Panax ginseng grown under three different forest types. J. Plant. Biol. 2004, 47, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ok, S.; Kang, J.S.; Kim, K.M. Cultivated wild ginseng extracts upregulate the anti-apoptosis systems in cells and mice induced by bisphenol A. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 2017, 13, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Fu, Y.; Yin, Z.; Wu, L.; Yin, C. Fermentation of ginseng extracts by Penicillium simplicissimum GS33 and anti-ovarian cancer activity of fermented products. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 1019–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Pan, H.Y.; Qu, Y.; Zhang, J.K.; Kang, T.G.; Dou, D.Q. Antioxidant activity of ginseng cultivated under mountainous forest with different growing years. J. Ginseng Res. 2013, 37, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Chang-Xiao, L.; Pei-Gen, X. Recent advances on ginseng research in China. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1992, 36, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Van der Voort, M.E.; McGraw, J.B. Effects of harvester behavior on population growth rate affects sustainability of ginseng trade. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 130, 505–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Frey, G.E.; Chamberlain, J.L.; Prestemon, J.P. The potential for a backward-bending supply curve of non-timber forest products: An empirical case study of wild American ginseng production. For. Policy Econ. 2018, 97, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Baeg, I.H.; So, S.H. The world ginseng market and the ginseng. J. Ginseng Res. 2013, 37, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Chung, H.S.; Lee, Y.; Kyung Rhee, Y.; Lee, S. Consumer acceptance of ginseng food products. J. Food Sci. 2011, 76, S516–S522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Pigott, T. Advances in Meta-Analysis; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; ISBN 1461422787. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses flow diagram.
Figure 1. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses flow diagram.
Forests 12 00664 g001
Figure 2. Geographic distribution of wild-simulated ginseng articles. The darker the green color, the higher the number of articles. This figure excludes five articles including more than one country cases and eight articles without specific country case (N = 115).
Figure 2. Geographic distribution of wild-simulated ginseng articles. The darker the green color, the higher the number of articles. This figure excludes five articles including more than one country cases and eight articles without specific country case (N = 115).
Forests 12 00664 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of wild-simulated ginseng articles by country and year (N = 115). The numbers indicate total articles published from January to December. However, the number of articles in 2020 includes articles from January 2020 to October 2020. The category of multiple countries means more than one country and the category of unspecified means no specific country.
Figure 3. Distribution of wild-simulated ginseng articles by country and year (N = 115). The numbers indicate total articles published from January to December. However, the number of articles in 2020 includes articles from January 2020 to October 2020. The category of multiple countries means more than one country and the category of unspecified means no specific country.
Forests 12 00664 g003
Figure 4. Distribution of wild-simulated species (a) and study fields (b) (N = 115).
Figure 4. Distribution of wild-simulated species (a) and study fields (b) (N = 115).
Forests 12 00664 g004
Figure 5. Characteristics of WSG research: (a) growth conditions, (b) components, (c) effects on humans (animals), and (d) effects on the environment of wild-simulated ginseng.
Figure 5. Characteristics of WSG research: (a) growth conditions, (b) components, (c) effects on humans (animals), and (d) effects on the environment of wild-simulated ginseng.
Forests 12 00664 g005aForests 12 00664 g005b
Figure 6. Clustering of topics related to wild-simulated ginseng. The five resulting clusters are colored by topic group. The size of the nodes is proportional to the sum of the links, called centralities. The bigger the size of the node is, the more influential the node is in the network. Topic A: Medicinal effects; Topic B: Metabolite analysis; Topic C: Genetic diversity; Topic D: Cultivation conditions; Topic E: Bioactive compounds.
Figure 6. Clustering of topics related to wild-simulated ginseng. The five resulting clusters are colored by topic group. The size of the nodes is proportional to the sum of the links, called centralities. The bigger the size of the node is, the more influential the node is in the network. Topic A: Medicinal effects; Topic B: Metabolite analysis; Topic C: Genetic diversity; Topic D: Cultivation conditions; Topic E: Bioactive compounds.
Forests 12 00664 g006
Figure 7. Sankey diagram on topics of wild-simulated ginseng research. The flow diagram shows the country names on the left and aggregation into the five topics on the right. The dimension of rectangles on the right is proportional to the fields’ prevalence. Colors are the same as in Figure 2. Topic A: Medicinal effects; Topic B: Metabolite analysis; Topic C: Genetic diversity; Topic D: Cultivation conditions; Topic E: Bioactive compounds.
Figure 7. Sankey diagram on topics of wild-simulated ginseng research. The flow diagram shows the country names on the left and aggregation into the five topics on the right. The dimension of rectangles on the right is proportional to the fields’ prevalence. Colors are the same as in Figure 2. Topic A: Medicinal effects; Topic B: Metabolite analysis; Topic C: Genetic diversity; Topic D: Cultivation conditions; Topic E: Bioactive compounds.
Forests 12 00664 g007
Figure 8. Change in topic share by period. Topic A: Medicinal effects; Topic B: Metabolite analysis; Topic C: Genetic diversity; Topic D: Cultivation conditions; Topic E: Bioactive compounds.
Figure 8. Change in topic share by period. Topic A: Medicinal effects; Topic B: Metabolite analysis; Topic C: Genetic diversity; Topic D: Cultivation conditions; Topic E: Bioactive compounds.
Forests 12 00664 g008
Table 1. Coding category system.
Table 1. Coding category system.
CategorySub-Category
Bibliographic dataAuthor, Title, Keywords, Abstracts, DOI, and Publication year.
Study site and fieldsCountry, Species, Farming area, and Study fields (Natural/Social).
Growth conditionsSite, Growth, Genetic diversity, Microstructure, Production, Photosynthesis, Age, Harvest, Pathogen/Disease, Season, and Fertilizer.
ComponentsGinsenosides, Genome, Phenolic contents, Fatty acids, Proteins, Carbohydrates, Polyacetylene, Leaves, and Oligosaccharides.
Effects on environmentSoil, Carbon, Biodiversity, and Biocontrol.
Effects on animals (Humans)Anti-oxidation, Anti-inflammation, Anti-cancer, Psychological (Stress), Obesity, Growth, Immune, Blood lipid profile, Alzheimer’s Disease, Glycemic control, Semen, Fatigue, Tumor, Blood Pressure, Insulin Resistance, Liver function, Parkinson’s disease, Diabetes, Dry eye syndrome, and Anti-apoptosis.
Table 2. Frequency of the top 25 keywords.
Table 2. Frequency of the top 25 keywords.
RankKeywordsFrequency
1Panax ginseng49
2wild-simulated ginseng30
3ginsenoside25
4ginseng16
5antioxidant activity10
6wild ginseng10
7cultivated ginseng9
8metabolite8
9American ginseng7
10genetic diversity7
11cytotoxicity5
12HPLC5
13medicinal plant5
14plant conservation5
15UPLC-Q-TOF-MS5
16soil4
17Araliaceae3
18bacterial endophyte3
19Burkholderia stabilis3
20climate change3
21ginseng pathogens3
22harvest3
23identification3
24pharmacopuncture3
25saponin3
Table 3. Five topic groups related to wild-simulated ginseng.
Table 3. Five topic groups related to wild-simulated ginseng.
Topic ATopic BTopic CTopic DTopic E
Medicinal EffectsMetabolite AnalysisGenetic DiversityCultivation ConditionsBioactive Compounds
medicinal plantmetabolitecultivated ginsengAmerican ginsengginseng pathogens
cytotoxicityUPLC-Q-TOF-MSgenetic diversityplant conservationBurkholderia stabilis
understory ginsengHPLCsoilHarvestbacterial endophyte
fermentationcultivated ginsengcytotoxicityclimate changequercetin
photosynthesissaponinleaf littermedicinal plantkaempferol
KoreaidentificationRAPDAraliaceaemetabolite
edible plantsphenolic compoundspharmacopuncturegenetic diversitybisphenol A
polyacetylenebioreactor culturetranscriptometrimethyltintesticular toxicity
Allium tricoccumadventitious rootssuitable siteIL-6ethyl acetate extract
forest inventorymicroorganismcalcium oxalate crystal accumulationgeoadditive modelbiocontrol
Actaea racemosaAraliaceaesoil microbial communityopen access resourceDPPH radicals
local and traditional ecological knowledgecultivation age16s rDNAforest herbaceous plantginseng leaves
panaxidoldiscrimination modelinter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR)timeseriesgenome sequence
forestry economygenomicChinaspecies distribution modelcell free supernatant
development countermeasuressubcritical watergenetic differentiationlife table response experimentleaf
ovarian cancer cellsdiscriminationterpenoids biosynthesis genesnon timber forest productsbiological control
ginseng extractsquantitative analysisterpenoid phytohormonesrestoration ecologyinsulin
Bifidobacteriumshikoninsmulchendangered speciespanaxidol
growthgamma irradiationplant densityJackknife testcomplementary and alternative medicine
stomatal conductancecamptothecinUPGMAecological suitable areapharmacopuncture
agebiomasspopulationdeer browsingmedicinal plant
insulinOPLS-DAIllumina MiSeq sequencingextinction vortexapoptosis
Chinese medicinevacuum freeze dryingbiomarker fungalplant husbandrypolyacetylene
genome divergencecell suspensioncomplementary and alternative medicineforest farmingKorea
FISHChinese medicinede novo RNA sequencingwoods grown American ginsengphotosynthesis
rRNA genepeptidemicrosatellitescultivated American ginsengproductivity
Tuinapeptidomicsheterozygositywinter warminglivestock
GISHginseng growth cyclegene expressionfrostantibiotic
chronic fatigue syndromeECUltra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometrydemographyalternative
massageagroforestry systemsChinese medicinetesticular toxicityhepatocellular carcinoma
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shin, S.; Park, M.S.; Lee, H.; Lee, S.; Lee, H.; Kim, T.H.; Kim, H.J. Global Trends in Research on Wild-Simulated Ginseng: Quo Vadis? Forests 2021, 12, 664. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060664

AMA Style

Shin S, Park MS, Lee H, Lee S, Lee H, Kim TH, Kim HJ. Global Trends in Research on Wild-Simulated Ginseng: Quo Vadis? Forests. 2021; 12(6):664. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060664

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shin, Seongmin, Mi Sun Park, Hansol Lee, Seongeun Lee, Haeun Lee, Tae Hoon Kim, and Hyo Jin Kim. 2021. "Global Trends in Research on Wild-Simulated Ginseng: Quo Vadis?" Forests 12, no. 6: 664. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060664

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop