Integrating Ecosystem Services Valuation into Land Use Planning: Case of the Ukrainian Agricultural Landscapes
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Conceptual Framework
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Study Area
- Scenario 1. Land reclamation scenario—transformation of arable land to meadows and forest shelterbelts
- Scenario 2. Land protection and bioenergy production scenario.
3.2. Methodology of Complex Land Use Planning
- Scheme of the modern land use;
- Scheme of the regime-forming objects and restrictions on land use;
- Scheme of the planned measures on rational use and protection of lands;
- Scheme of the prospective use of lands and organization of the community territory;
- Participative scheme of territory planning that includes involvement of the community authorities.
- Land area intended for remediation and conservation;
- Land plots, which cannot be used for arable farming because they are located on the slopes above 5°;
- Forest belts that actually perform the function of forest amelioration on the territory;
- Natural territories for creation of new objects of the natural reserve fund;
- Objects of cultural heritage.
3.3. Methodology for Valuing Ecosystem Services
3.3.1. Biological Control of Pests Service (ES1)
3.3.2. Nitrogen (N) Regulation Service (ES2)
3.3.3. Soil Formation (ES3)
3.3.4. Food and Feed Production (ES4)
3.3.5. Biomass Raw Material Production (ES5)
3.3.6. Carbon Accumulation (ES6)
3.3.7. Hydrological Flow (ES7)
3.3.8. Pollination (ES8)
4. Results
4.1. Land Use Planning Scenarios
- Land reclamation scenario transformation of arable land to meadows and forest shelterbelts;
- Land protection and bioenergy production scenario.
4.2. Ecosystem Services Value under Alternative Scenarios
5. Discussion
- Degraded and marginal agricultural lands, which are submitted to conservation by means of reforestation;
- Lands which are unsuitable for agricultural use (gullies, ravines, steep slopes, rocky land, sand);
- Remediated lands, valleys, and wastelands;
- Lands of agricultural and other intended use, determined for forest plantings of a linear type (forest shelterbelts, belts along the river-sides, borders of canals, water bodies, railways, motor ways).
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Costanza, R.; d’Arge, R.; de Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’Neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daily, G.C.; Polsky, S.; Goldstein, J.; Kareiva, P.M.; Mooney, H.; Pejchar, L.; Ricketts, T.H.; Salzman, J.; Shallemberger, R. Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mandle, L.; Shields-Estrada, A.; Chaplin-Kramer, R.; Mitchell, M.G.E.; Bremer, L.L.; Gourevitch, J.D.; Hawthorne, P.; Johnson, J.A.; Robinson, B.E.; Smith, J.R.; et al. Increasing decision relevance of ecosystem service science. Nat. Sustain. 2021, 4, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, E.T.; Tilley, D.R. Valuing ecosystem services from Maryland forests using environmental accounting. Ecosyst. Serv. 2014, 7, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jawed, K.; Greene, P.; Wei Hoo, K. Measuring UK Woodland Ecosystem Assets and Ecosystem Services. Available online: https://www.wavespartnership.org/sites/waves/files/documents/measuring_UK_woodland_ecosystem_assets_and_ecosystem_services.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2021).
- Von Haaren, C.; Lovett, A.A.; Albert, C. (Eds.) Landscape Planning with Ecosystem Services: Theories and Methods for Application in Europe; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Geneletti, D.; Cortinovis, C.; Zardo, L.; Esmail, B.A. Planning for Ecosystem Services in Cities. In Briefs in Environmental Sciences; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Salata, S.; Ronchi, S.; Giaimo, C.; Arcidiacono, A.; Pantaloni, G.G. Performance-Based Planning to Reduce Flooding Vulnerability Insights from the Case of Turin (North-West Italy). Sustainability 2021, 13, 5697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leckson, K.M. (Ed.) Agroforestry for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services—Science and Practice; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gensiruk, S.A.; Bondar, V.S. Forest Resources of Ukraine, Its Conservation and Use; Naukova Dumka: Kiev, Ukraine, 1973. (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
- Soloviy, I.P. Afforestation in Ukraine—Potential and Restrictions. EFI Proceedings No. 35. NEWFOR—New Forests for Europe: Afforestation at the Turn of the Century; Weber, N., Ed.; European Forest Institute: Joensuu, Finland, 2000; pp. 195–213. [Google Scholar]
- Gensiruk, S.A. The Complex Forest Management; The Board of Productive Forces of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences: Kiev, Ukraine, 1980; pp. 13–17. (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
- About Some Measures for the Preservation and Reproduction of Forests. Decree of the President of Ukraine №228/2021. Adoption on 7 June 2021. Available online: https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/2282021-39089 (accessed on 8 June 2021). (In Ukrainian)
- State Service of Ukraine for Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre, Official Site. Available online: http://land.gov.ua/ (accessed on 10 June 2021). (In Ukrainian)
- GEOPORTALUA. Available online: https://map.geoportalua.com/ua/otg/5324082701/ (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- On Approval of the Concept for the Development of Agroforestry in Ukraine. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 725-p, Adoption on 18 September 2013. Available online: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/725-2013-%D1%80#Text (accessed on 17 June 2021). (In Ukrainian)
- Kuryltsiv, R.; Hernik, J.; Kryshenyk, N. Impact of land reform on sustainable land management in Ukraine. Acta Sci. Pol. Form. Circumiectus 2018, 17, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- On Amendments to Some Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Land Use Planning. Law of Ukraine No 711-IX, Adoption on 17 June 2020. Available online: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/711-20 (accessed on 13 June 2021). (In Ukrainian)
- Kolomak Amalgamated Territorial Community, Official Site. Available online: http://kolomak-rada.gov.ua/2019/07/29/vykorystannya-zemelnyh-resursiv-gromady/ (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Wratten, S.D. Ecosystem Services in Agricultural and Urban Landscapes; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Chichester, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Izac, A.M.N. Economic aspects of soil fertility management and agroforestry practices. In Trees Crops and Soil Fertility: Concepts and Research Methods; Schroth, G., Sinclair, F., Eds.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Vysotska, N.; Kalashnikov, A.; Sydorenko, S.; Sydorenko, S.; Yurchenko, V. Ecosystem services of shelterbelts as the basis of compensatory mechanisms of their creation and maintenance. In Proceedings of the Forestry Academy of Sciences of Ukraine: Collection of Research Papers, Lviv, Ukraine; Company “Manuscript”. 2021; Volume 22, pp. 199–209. (In Ukrainian). [Google Scholar]
- Petrovich, O. Field protective forest belts in the context of implementation of the concept of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Optim. Prot. 2014, 11, 42–49. (In Ukrainian). Available online: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ecooo_2014_11_6 (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- Garrod, G.; Willis, K.G. Economic Valuation of the Environment: Methods and Case Studies; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Porter, J.; Costanza, R.; Sandhu, H.; Sigsgaard, L.; Wratten, S. The Value of Producing Food, Energy, and Ecosystem Services within an Agro-Ecosystem. Ambio 2009, 38, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weighted Average Exchange Rate in the Cash Foreign Exchange Market of Ukraine (According to the NBU). Available online: https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/exchange/bank/nbu/ (accessed on 10 June 2021). (In Ukrainian).
- Sydorenko, S.; Sydorenko, S. Economic evaluation of ecological services of field protection plantations in the context of management decision-making. In Proceedings of the Second All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference “European Integration of Environmental Policy of Ukraine”, Odessa, Ukraine, 22 October 2020. (In Ukrainian). [Google Scholar]
- Bjorklund, J.; Limburg, K.E.; Rydberg, T. Impact of production intensity on the ability of the agricultural landscape to generate ecosystem services: An example from Sweden. Ecol. Econ. 1999, 29, 269–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ammonium Nitrate Nitrogen of 20 kg of N 34.4%. Available online: https://rozetka.com.ua/ua/198066049/p198066049/ (accessed on 8 June 2021). (In Ukrainian).
- Fedorets, N.; Bakhmet, O. Ecological Features of Transformation of Carbon and Nitrogen Compounds in Forest Soils; Karelian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Petrozavodsk, Russia, 2003. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Posudin, Y. Environmental Monitoring with the Basics of Metrology. Available online: http://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/handle/123456789/1568 (accessed on 1 June 2021). (In Ukrainian).
- Shkvaruk, M.; Delemenchuk, M. Pedology. Available online: https://collectedpapers.com.ua/category/soil_science (accessed on 1 June 2021). (In Ukrainian).
- State Statistics Service of Ukraine, Official Site. Available online: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ (accessed on 13 June 2021). (In Ukrainian)
- Mikhin, V.; Chernodubov, A.; Mikhina, E.; Malyshev, V. Monitoring and polymorphism in forest-steppe plantations. IOP Conf. Series. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 226, 012002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prices of Wheat in Ukraine Falling for Three Consecutive Months. Available online: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ (accessed on 13 June 2021).
- Yarmolyuk, M.; Kotyash, U.; Demchyshyn, N. Ecobiological and Agrotechnical Bases of Creation and Use of Grassy Phytocenoses; PAIS: Lviv, Ukraine, 2010. (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
- Analytical Study of the Use of Biomass of Energy Crops in the Northern Regions of Ukraine. Available online: https://www.ppv.net.ua/uploads/work_attachments/Studies_of_Forest-based_and_Energy_Crops_Biomass-for-Energy_Use_in_Northern_Oblasts_of_Ukraine_PPV_2018_UA.pdf (accessed on 8 June 2021). (In Ukrainian).
- Information and Analytical Magazine “Agribusiness Today”. Available online: http://agro-business.com.ua/2017-09-17-13-25-07.html (accessed on 22 July 2021). (In Ukrainian).
- Gumentik, M.; Yagolnik, O. Recommendations for the Technology of Growing and Using Paulownia in the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine; Comprint: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2020. (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
- Pimentel, D.; Houser, J.; Preiss, E.; White, O.; Fang, H.; Mesnick, L.; Barsky, T.; Tariche, S.; Schreck, J.; Alpert, S. Water resources: Agriculture, the environment, and society. Bioscience 1997, 47, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hladun, H.; Role of the Protective Forest Stands in Providing of Sustainable Development of the Agrolandscapes. Scientific Bulletin of NFUU 2005, 7. Available online: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/znachennya-zahisnih-lisovih-nasadzhen-dlya-zabezpechennya-stalogo-rozvitku-agrolandshaftiv (accessed on 22 July 2021). (In Ukrainian).
- They Turned on the Tap: How Much Will Irrigation Cost in the New Season. Available online: https://agravery.com/uk/posts/show/prikrutili-kran-skilki-kostuvatime-zrosenna-v-novomu-sezoni (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Ilminskaya, L. Pollination of Plants by Insects. Ecosystem Services. Ukrainian Nature Conservation Group. 2020. Available online: https://uncg.org.ua/zapylennia-roslyn-komakhamy/ (accessed on 8 June 2021). (In Ukrainian).
- Karpenko, A. Beekeeping: How the Paid Pollination Market Works. 2019. Available online: https://pasika.pp.ua/multimedia/news-beekeeping/item/811-bee-colony-how-does-the-paid-pollination-market-work.html (accessed on 8 June 2021). (In Ukrainian).
- Brackhahn, B.; Kärkkäinen, R. Spatial Planning as an Instrument for Promoting Sustainable Development in the Nordic Countries. Action Programme for 2001–2004; Ministries Responsible for the Environment in the five Nordic countries: Denmark, Finland; Danish Ministry of Environment and Energy: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Hernik, J. Protecting cultural landscapes in rural areas by economic means. Ann. Wars. Univ. Life Sci. SGGW Hortic. Landsc. Archit. 2012, 33, 105–112. [Google Scholar]
- Dust Storms Destroyed up to 10% of Sugar Beet Area in Ternopil Region. Available online: http://www.ukrsugar.com/en/post/dust-storms-destroyed-up-to-10-of-sugar-beet-area-in-ternopil-region (accessed on 13 June 2021).
- Windbreak. From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windbreak (accessed on 13 June 2021).
- FAO Farmer’s School: Forest Protection Systems and Criteria for Optimizing Them. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWbX5syInEM (accessed on 13 June 2021). (In Ukrainian).
- Keesstra, S.; Nunes, J.; Novara, A.; Finger, D.; Avelar, D.; Kalantari, Z.; Cerdà, A. The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 610–611, 997–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Agroforestry and Conservation Agriculture in Ukraine, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: http://www.fao.org/gef/highlights/detail/en/c/1293651/ (accessed on 17 June 2021).
- OTG boundaries appeared on the Public Cadastral Map. Available online: https://lexinform.com.ua/v-ukraini/mezhi-otg-z-yavylysya-na-publichnij-kadastrovij-karti/ (accessed on 17 June 2021).
- Energy Willow: How to Grow and How Much you Can Earn From it They Know in Rivne Region. Available online: https://ecotechnica.com.ua/stati/708-energeticheskaya-verba-kak-vyrastit-i-skolko-na-etom-mozhno-zarabotat-znayut-na-rovenshchine.html (accessed on 17 June 2021).
- Land and Desert. Ukraine Can Lose Its Soil if it Does not Stop the Barbaric Plowing of Natural Areas. Available online: https://texty.org.ua/articles/96018/Zemla_i_pustela_Ukrajina_mozhe_vtratyty_svoji-96018/ (accessed on 17 June 2021).
- Auclair, D.; Dupraz, C. Agroforestry for Sustainable Land-Use Fundamental Research and Modelling with Emphasis on Temperate and Mediterranean Applications; Forestry Sciences; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ukrainian Order “Sign of honour” Research Institute of Forestry and Forest Melioration Named after G. M. Vysotsky State Forest Resources Agency of Ukraine and the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Official Site. Available online: https://uriffm.org.ua/en/ (accessed on 17 June 2021).
- About Modification of Some Legislative Acts of Ukraine Concerning the Decision of a Question of Collective Land Ownership, Improvement of Rules of Land Use in Massifs of the Lands of Agricultural Purpose, Prevention of Raiding and Stimulation of Irrigation in Ukraine. Law of Ukraine No 2498-VIII, Adoption on 10 July 2018. Available online: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2498-19#Text (accessed on 15 June 2021). (In Ukrainian)
- On Approval of the Rules of Forest Reproduction. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 303, Adoption on 1 March 2007. Available online: https://ecotechnica.com.ua/stati/708-energeticheskaya-verba-kak-vyrastit-i-skolko-na-etom-mozhno-zarabotat-znayut-na-rovenshchine.html (accessed on 18 June 2021). (In Ukrainian).
- Hardaker, A.; Pagella, T.; Rayment, M. Ecosystem service and dis-service impacts of increasing tree cover on agricultural land by land-sparing and land-sharing in the Welsh uplands. Ecosyst. Serv. 2021, 48, 101253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grilli, G.; Paletto, A. Valuing and Mapping Ecosystem Services for Renewable Energy Planning. Available online: http://www.recharge-green.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/04_Grilli_ESS2-Kopie.pdf (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- Gomes, E.; Inácio, M.; Bogdzevič, K.; Kalinauskas, M.; Karnauskaitė, D.; Pereira, P. Future land-use changes and its impacts on terrestrial ecosystem services: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prus, B.; Uruszczak, M.; Hernik, J. Arguments based on biocultural diversity to cease abandonment of traditional agricultural systems: Lessons from Poland. Biodivers. Conserv. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The National Action Plan for Environmental Protection until 2025. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 443-p, Adoption on 21 April 2021. Available online: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/303-2007-%D0%BF#Text (accessed on 10 July 2021). (In Ukrainian)
- Kumar, P. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations; [TEEB: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity]; Routledge: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Caputo, J.; Beier, C.M.; Luzadis, V.A.; Groffman, P.M. Integrating beneficiaries into assessment of ecosystem services from managed forests at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest. For. Ecosyst. 2016, 3, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Scale | Ecosystem functions |
---|---|
Farm | Food and feed production Biomass raw material production Nitrogen (N) regulation service Soil formation hydrological flow Biological control of pests Microclimate regulation |
Watershed/village/landscape | Erosion and sedimentation control Hydrological flow Pollination, biological control, and refugia (landscape patches) Carbon accumulation |
Regional | Biodiversity Water cycle |
Global/supraregional | Greenhouse gas regulation Climate regulation Biodiversity |
Index | Baseline Scenario | Land Reclamation Scenario | Land Protection and Bioenergy Production Scenario |
---|---|---|---|
Total area, ha | 1390.6 | 1390.6 | 1390.6 |
Area of arable land under cereals (barley, wheat, …), ha | 1338.9 | 613.1 | 613.1 |
Area of grassland, ha | 43.3 | 736.1 | 154.8 |
Area of bioenergy plant (willow…), ha | 0.0 | 0.0 | 581.2 |
Forest shelterbelts | 8.4 | 41.4 | 41.4 |
Ecosystem Services | Non-Market Services | Market Services | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crops | Pastures | Biomass Belts | Forest Shelterbelts | Crops | Pastures | Biomass Belts | Forest Shelterbelts | ||
ES1 | 405 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 405 |
ES2 | 141,469 | 9139 | 0 | 26 | - | - | - | - | 150,634 |
ES3 | 187 | 15 | 0 | 43,462 | - | - | - | - | 43,664 |
ES4 | - | - | - | - | 43,449 | 754 | - | - | 44,202 |
ES5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | - | 0 |
ES6 | 2401 | 124 | 0 | 13 | - | - | - | - | 2538 |
ES7 | 8676 | 280 | 0 | 69 | - | - | - | - | 9026 |
ES8 | 0 | 119 | 0 | 23 | - | - | - | - | 142 |
Sum | 153,139 | 9678 | 0 | 43,592 | 43,449 | 754 | 0 | 0 | 250,611 |
Total | 206,409 | 44,202 | 250,611 |
Ecosystem Services | Non-Market Services | Market Services | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crops | Pastures | Biomass Belts | Forest Shelterbelts | Crops | Pastures | Biomass Belts | Forest Shelterbelts | ||
ES1 | 2000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2000 |
ES2 | 64,781 | 155,537 | 0 | 127 | - | - | - | - | 220,445 |
ES3 | 86 | 258 | 0 | 214,397 | - | - | - | - | 214,740 |
ES4 | - | - | - | - | 19,896 | 12,825 | - | - | 32,721 |
ES5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | - | 0 |
ES6 | 1099 | 1320 | 0 | 63 | - | - | - | - | 2482 |
ES7 | 5033 | 6042 | 0 | 340 | - | - | - | - | 11,414 |
ES8 | 0 | 2024 | 0 | 114 | - | - | - | - | 2138 |
Sum | 72,999 | 165,180 | 0 | 215,040 | 19,896 | 12,825 | 0 | 0 | 485,940 |
Total | 453,219 | 32,721 | 485,940 |
Ecosystem Services | Non-Market Services | Market Services | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crops | Pastures | Biomass Belts | Forest Shelterbelts | Crops | Pastures | Biomass Belts | Forest Shelterbelts | ||
ES1 | 2000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2000 |
ES2 | 64,781 | 32,722 | 4272 | 127 | - | - | - | - | 101,902 |
ES3 | 85 | 54 | 203 | 214,397 | - | - | - | - | 214,740 |
ES4 | - | - | - | - | 19,896 | 2698 | - | - | 22,594 |
ES5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 13,077 | - | 13,077 |
ES6 | 1099 | 278 | 69,473 | 63 | - | - | - | - | 70,913 |
ES7 | 5033 | 1271 | 4770 | 340 | - | - | - | - | 11,414 |
ES8 | 0 | 426 | 1598 | 114 | - | - | - | - | 2138 |
Sum | 72,999 | 34,751 | 80,317 | 215,040 | 19,896 | 2698 | 13,077 | 0 | 438,778 |
Total | 403,107 | 35,671 | 438,778 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Soloviy, I.; Kuryltsiv, R.; Hernik, J.; Kryshenyk, N.; Kuleshnyk, T. Integrating Ecosystem Services Valuation into Land Use Planning: Case of the Ukrainian Agricultural Landscapes. Forests 2021, 12, 1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12111465
Soloviy I, Kuryltsiv R, Hernik J, Kryshenyk N, Kuleshnyk T. Integrating Ecosystem Services Valuation into Land Use Planning: Case of the Ukrainian Agricultural Landscapes. Forests. 2021; 12(11):1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12111465
Chicago/Turabian StyleSoloviy, Ihor, Roman Kuryltsiv, Józef Hernik, Nadiia Kryshenyk, and Taras Kuleshnyk. 2021. "Integrating Ecosystem Services Valuation into Land Use Planning: Case of the Ukrainian Agricultural Landscapes" Forests 12, no. 11: 1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12111465