Next Article in Journal
Diversity and Pathogenicity of Phytophthora Species Associated with Declining Alder Trees in Italy and Description of Phytophthora alpina sp. nov
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling Climatic Influences on Three Parasitoids of Low-Density Spruce Budworm Populations. Part 1: Tranosema rostrale (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae)
Article

Economic Performance of Genetically Improved Reforestation Material in Joint Production of Timber and Carbon Sequestration: A Case Study from Finland

1
Natural Resources Institute Finland, University of Oulu, Paavo Havaksentie 3, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
2
Department of Mathematics, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland
3
Natural Resources Institute Finland, Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2020, 11(8), 847; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080847
Received: 15 June 2020 / Revised: 9 July 2020 / Accepted: 2 August 2020 / Published: 5 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Ecology and Management)
Genetically improved material has been proven to financially outperform unimproved material in timber production according to various studies. Genetic improvements in carbon sequestration are also promising, implying a possibility for further financial gains. Research Highlights: Including carbon pricing (i.e., timber production combined with carbon sequestration) with genetically improved material improves financial performance compared to pure timber production. Furthermore, the proportion of carbon benefit (%) of absolute bare land value fluctuates between 27% and 42%, indicating a substantial role of carbon sequestration to financial performance. Background and Objectives: Until now, economic analyses of the impact of tree improvement have mainly dealt with growth performance: volume yield or height growth. Yet planted forests can have a significant contribution to carbon sequestration, which will play a major role in carbon markets. This study focuses on comparing the financial performance between genetically improved and unimproved reforestation material when stand management is optimized according to timber production or to joint production (timber and carbon sequestration together). Another goal is to reveal possible differences in financial performance related to climatic conditions along the south–north gradient. Materials and Methods: The stand projections are based on simulations with and without genetic gains for joint production (timber + carbon) and merely timber production in eight locations in Finland. Stand-level optimization is applied for financial analyses. Results: Genetically improved reforestation material considerably enhanced financial performance when the joint production of timber and carbon was applied, regardless of the climatic region. Conclusions: If carbon pricing became a reality, there would be a distinctive shift in bare land values, which is further boosted by a genetic gain. View Full-Text
Keywords: stand-level optimization; genetic gains; carbon pricing; joint production; Scots pine stand-level optimization; genetic gains; carbon pricing; joint production; Scots pine
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahtikoski, A.; Ahtikoski, R.; Haapanen, M.; Hynynen, J.; Kärkkäinen, K. Economic Performance of Genetically Improved Reforestation Material in Joint Production of Timber and Carbon Sequestration: A Case Study from Finland. Forests 2020, 11, 847. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080847

AMA Style

Ahtikoski A, Ahtikoski R, Haapanen M, Hynynen J, Kärkkäinen K. Economic Performance of Genetically Improved Reforestation Material in Joint Production of Timber and Carbon Sequestration: A Case Study from Finland. Forests. 2020; 11(8):847. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080847

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahtikoski, Anssi, Roope Ahtikoski, Matti Haapanen, Jari Hynynen, and Katri Kärkkäinen. 2020. "Economic Performance of Genetically Improved Reforestation Material in Joint Production of Timber and Carbon Sequestration: A Case Study from Finland" Forests 11, no. 8: 847. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080847

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop