Next Article in Journal
The Conservation Status and Population Mapping of the Endangered Dracaena serrulata in the Dhofar Mountains, Oman
Next Article in Special Issue
Isotopic and Water Relation Responses to Ozone and Water Stress in Seedlings of Three Oak Species with Different Adaptation Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Aboveground Biomass Allometric Models for Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forest Damaged by a Serious Ice Storm in Southern China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Male and Female Plants of Salix viminalis Perform Similarly to Flooding in Morphology, Anatomy, and Physiology

1
School of Architectural and Artistic Design, Henan Polytechnic University, Century Avenue, Jiaozuo 454000, China
2
College of Horticulture and Landscape, Henan Vocational College of Agriculture, Zhengzhou 451450, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation, State Forestry Administration, Beijing 10091, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Forests 2020, 11(3), 321; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11030321
Submission received: 7 February 2020 / Revised: 8 March 2020 / Accepted: 11 March 2020 / Published: 14 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Relationships between Growth and Water Relations of Trees)

Abstract

:
Salix viminalis L., a dioecious species, is widely distributed in riparian zones, and flooding is one of the most common abiotic stresses that this species suffers. In this study, we investigated the morphological, anatomical, and physiological responses of male vs. female plants of S. viminalis to flooding. The results showed that the plant height and root collar diameter were stimulated by flooding treatment, which corresponded with higher dry weight of the stem and leaf. However, the dry weight of the underground part decreased, which might be due to the primary root having stopped growing. The little-influenced net photosynthesis rate (Pn) under flooding treatment could guarantee rapid growth of the aboveground part, while the unaffected leaf anatomical structure and photosynthetic pigment contents could ensure the normal operation of photosynthetic apparatus. Under a flooding environment, the production ratio of superoxide free radical (O2∙-) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents increased, indicating that the cell membrane was damaged and oxidative stress was induced. At the same time, the antioxidant enzyme system, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and osmotic adjustment substances, involving proline (Pro) and solute protein (SP), began to play a positive role in resisting flooding stress. Different from our expectation, the male and female plants of S. viminalis performed similarly under flooding, and no significant differences were discovered. The results indicate that both male and female plants of S. viminalis are tolerant to flooding. Thus, both male and female plants of S. viminalis could be planted in frequent flooding zones.

1. Introduction

Flooding is one of the primary abiotic stresses encountered by many plants, and it develops when the water content in the soil surpasses the field moisture capacity [1]. Soil flooding is usually caused by heavy rainfall, poor soil drainage, and some irrigation practices [2]. The water layer above the soil can be shallow or deep, so partial or complete submergence can be induced [3]. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (http://www.ipcc.ch) reported that man-induced climate change will increase the frequency of heavy precipitations and tropical cyclone activity, and it is likely that the flood plains (i.e., lowlands), riparian zones, and cultivated lands will suffer from more frequent flooding events [4].
Soil flooding always restricts O2 diffusion to plants, and thereby inhibits their aerobic respiration [5]. This is often accompanied by a decrease in soil pH and an accumulation of toxic soil substances [6,7]. Under low-oxygen conditions, plants usually have typical alternations in morphology, anatomy, and physiology to adapt to the anaerobic environment. At the morphological level, some adaptable plants under flooding conditions are often taller than their non-flooded comparisons, such as marsh dock (Rumex palustris Sm.) [8], rhodes grass (Chloris gayana Kunth), kleingrass (Panicum coloratum L.) [9], and Sentang (Azadirachta excelsa (Jack)Jacobs) [10]. On the contrary, there are also some plants that exhibit shorter stems as a result of the negative impact of the anaerobic environment on growth [11,12]. In addition, an obvious response of plants tolerant to flooding is the formation of adventitious roots, which could help to maintain normal function of water and nutrient uptake and thus relieve the harmful effect of flooding [12,13]. Besides, the generation of aerenchyma in tissues is the most common anatomical response, which could facilitate the transport of oxygen from shoots to roots [3].
Leaf gas exchange parameters are one of the most frequently studied physiological processes of plants under flooding. The photosynthetic rate of many plants has been shown to present a significant declining trend, especially for flooding-sensitive plant species [13,14,15]. However, flooding-tolerant plants could maintain a high photosynthetic rate or photosynthesis is basically not influenced [14]. The causes for inhibited photosynthesis can be complex, including declined stomatal closure, decreased chlorophyll content, destruction of chloroplast membrane structure, reduction of enzyme activity associated with photosynthesis, and so on [15,16].
Under a flooding environment, the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide free radical (O2∙-), increases, which causes oxidative damage, lipid peroxidation of cell membranes, and irreversible metabolic dysfunctions, leading to cell death [17,18,19]. Malondialdehyde (MDA) is the final product of membrane lipid peroxidation, and the content of this substance is often used to assess the degree of oxidative damage of the cell plasma membrane [20,21]. However, the cellular ROS level can be regulated by a variety of antioxidant enzymes and nonenzymatic antioxidants [22]. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities are often activated when plants are subjected to flooding, indicating the efficient role of antioxidant enzymes in scavenging ROS [23,24].In addition, plants can also accumulate osmotic regulators, such as proline (Pro), to adjust the osmotic potential of cells, so that the stress pressure can be relieved [25].
Sexuality was precisely defined by Sachs for the first time, and since then, the study of sex in plants has been an interesting topic for researches [26]. Today, it is well established that dioecious plants account for 5.1% to 6.0% of angiosperm species (15,600 of 304,419 to 261,750) distributed in 987 genera and 175 families [27]. They play an important role in sustaining the stability and continuity of the structure and function of terrestrial ecosystems [28]. Because of different reproductive costs between male and female plants [29], gender (denoting the development of male and female individuals of plants) differences may be manifested under environmental stresses [30,31,32]. Previous studies reveal that gender differences vary greatly in plant species. It is shown that male plants of cathay poplar (Populus cathayana Rehd.) and yuannan poplar (Populus yunnanensis Dode.) are more resistant to stresses such as drought, salinity, and heavy metal [33,34,35]. However, the female plants of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) and dark-leaved willow (Salix myrsinifolia Salisb.) exhibit stronger tolerance to drought and UV-B stress, respectively [36,37]. So far, limited studies have been carried out to discuss gender-specific responses to flooding.
River systems are dominated by plenty of dioecious Salicaceae plants, which are frequently flooded [15,38]. Previous studies indicate that females of narrowleaf cottonwood (Populus angustifolia James) are more tolerant to flooding than males, which could be related to the greater frequency of females in flood-prone sites [39,40]. Salix viminalis L., a species of Salix, Salicaceae, is predominant in riparian zones, and the female plants are more prevalent in wetter zones that are prone to suffer from flooding. However, whether the male and female plants of S. viminalis perform differently (i.e., the females are more tolerant to flooding than males) under flooding has not been documented. Although there has been research to examine the responses of S. viminalis to soil flooding [41], no studies have been conducted to discuss possible gender differentiation of S. viminalis under flooding. In this study, we investigated the gender-specific responses of S. viminalis in morphology, anatomy, growth, gas exchange, chlorophyll pigment, oxidative stress degree, osmotic adjustment, and enzymatic antioxidants to flooding stress. The objectives of this study were to: (1) explore how flooding affects the morphological, anatomical, and physiological processes of dioecious S. viminalis, and (2) assess whether differences exist between male and female plants of S. viminalis under flooding stress.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Experiment Design

A male parent of S. viminalis from Heilihe nature reserve and a female parent from Saihanwula nature reserve were used for controlled intraspecific hybridization. In the F1 progeny containing 570 seedlings, 10 male and 10 female individuals were selected randomly. One-year-old branches were harvested to propagate cuttings from each individual on March 29th, 2018. The cuttings with a length of about 10 cm were grown in nutritive bowls filled with peat soil. Then, five male and five female clones were replanted in 16 cm diameter × 15 cm deep plastic pots on May 12th and the substrate was a 2:1 mixture of garden soil to peat soil. The plants were placed in a greenhouse of the Chinese Academy of Forestry Sciences in Beijing and were watered regularly until flooding application.
On June 10th, plants of similar height were selected for flooding treatment. The experimental layout was a completely randomized block design with two main factors (gender and watering regime). Two watering regimes were applied: well-watered treatment as control and flooding treatment. In the control, the plants were watered every day to maintain soil moisture at field capacity. In the flooding treatment, the pots were placed into a larger plastic bucket filled with tap water to 4 cm above the soil surface and watered every day to maintain the water level. During the flooding treatment, the morphological, photosynthetic, and physiological parameters were investigated at 7, 14, 21, 30, and 45 days. For the physiological parameters, the leaves were cut into pieces and mixed, put into the liquid nitrogen, and then stored at –80 °C. There were five blocks in this research, and the experiment was conducted during the gowning season from June 10th to July 25th, 2018. During this period, the precipitation is large and flooding events are more prone to occur.

2.2. Growth Characteristics (Height, Diameter, and Biomass)

The height and root collar diameter of each individual plant were measured at 0, 7, 14, 21, 30, and 45 days. The plant height was measured by a measuring tape with a precision of 0.1 cm, and the root collar diameter was evaluated by Vernier caliper with an accuracy of 0.01 cm. At the end of the experiment, the root, stem, and leaf were harvested and each component was dried to a constant weight and weighed, respectively.

2.3. Leaf Gas Exchange Parameters

Gas exchange parameters were measured in the 3rd~5th fully expanded and mature leaf from the top of the stem between 9:00 and 12:00 in the morning using the Li-Cor 6400XT photosynthesis measuring system (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) equipped with a red-blue light-emitting diode light source. The parameters included net photosynthesis (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), internal CO2 concentrations (Ci), and transpiration rate (Tr). The optimal parameters were set as follows: photosynthetic photon flux density of 1200 μmol m−2 s−1 and an approximately ambient CO2 concentration of 400 μmol mol−1.

2.4. Chlorophyll Pigment

About 0.20 g of leaf tissue, 0.2 × 0.2 cm in size, was immersed into 80% acetone (v:v) for 24 h, approximately under room temperature until all of the tissue turned white. Meanwhile, the tube was shaken at intervals. Then, the absorbance of the extracting solution was measured at 470, 646, and 663 nm. The content of chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), and carotenoid (Caro) were calculated by the equation described by Lichtenthaler [42].

2.5. Proline Content

Pro was extracted and measured according to the procedure by Bates et al. [43]. About 0.30 g of leaf tissue was immersed into 5 ml of 3% aqueous sulfosalicylic acid solution. After being extracted in a boiling water bath and filtered, 2.0 ml of glacial acetic acid and 2 ml of 2.5% acid ninhydrin were added into 2 ml of the supernatant. Then, the mixed solution was incubated in a boiling water bath. After the mixture was cooled, 5 ml of toluene was added and the absorbance was measured at 520 nm.

2.6. Production Ratio of Superoxide Free Radical, Malonaldehyde Content, Solute Proteins Content, and Autioxidant Enzyme Activities Determination

The frozen leaves were used to test the physiological indicators, including the production ratio of O2∙-, the MDA content, the solute proteins (SP) content, the SOD activity, the POD activity, the CAT activity, and the APX activity. All of these indicators were analyzed by applying the respective assay kit (Comin Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Suzhou, China).

2.7. Anatomical Structure Observation

The 5th fully expanded and mature leaf from the top of the stem was used for anatomical analysis. The same parts of the leaf were cut into 2 mm strips perpendicular to the main vein and immediately fixed in formalin, acetic acid, and alcohol solution (FAA) solution (70% alcohol/glacial acetic acid/40% formalin = 90:5:5, v/v) and stored at 4 °C. Then, the materials were, respectively, dehydrated with gradient ethanol of 75% (4 h), 85% (2 h), 90% (2 h), 95% (1 h), and 100% concentrations (two changes, 30 min). Next, they were immersed in mixed liquor with ethanol and xylene (10 min) and xylene (two changes, 10 min). Thereafter, the samples were embedded in paraffin by the Embedding Center (JB-P5, Wuhan Junjie Electronic Co., Ltd.), and subsequently crosscut into 4-μm-thick slices by a microtome (RM2016, Shanghai Leica Instrument Co. Ltd.). After dyeing in saffron for 2 h and solid green for 40 s, the cross-sections were observed and photographed using a NIKON ECLIPSE E100 microscope (Nikon Corporation, Japan).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed by SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Before the ANOVAs, the data were checked for normality, as well as the homogeneity of variances using Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene’s test, respectively. Individual differences among the means for each investigated time and each part of plant were identified by Duncan tests of one-way ANOVAs at a significance level of p < 0.05. Two-way ANOVAs were used to test the effects of gender, flooding, and their interaction, which was carried out using the multivariate General Linear Model procedure with Type III sum of squares.

3. Results

3.1. Gender-Specific Responses of Morphology to Flooding

All of the plants grew vigorously and no withering, defoliation, or death occurred during the study. At the end of experiment, about 3~5 leaves at the bottom of the plant under the flooding treatment turned yellow. White hypertrophied lenticels and adventitious roots developed at the base of the submerged shoot after 3 and 5 days of flooding treatment, respectively. However, there were no obvious differences between male and female plants.

3.2. Gender-Specific Responses of Plant Growth to Flooding

S. viminalis plants continued to grow for both the control and flooding treatment groups during the experiment (Figure 1). Flooding did not significantly affect the plant height or root collar diameter before the first 21 days, but the two parameters for flooding treatment were significantly higher than the control at 30 and 45 days. However, the plant height and root collar diameter between male and female plants showed no obvious differences throughout the experiment (Figure 1). Besides, the growth parameters were not significantly affected by gender × flooding interaction.
At the end of the flooding treatment, we found that the underground biomass of male and female plants was significantly decreased, including primary root and total root, in spite of the emergence of adventitious root, while the aboveground biomass (stem and leaf) was significantly increased (Figure 2). However, the total dry weight presented no significant differences between the control and the flooding treatment. Besides, the dry weight of each constituent and sapling had no significant differences between male and female plants. In addition, the dry weight was not significantly affected by gender × flooding interaction.

3.3. Gender-Specific Responses of Leaf Anatomical Structure to Flooding

The male and female plants displayed similar cross-section structures, including one-layer upper and lower epidermis, bi-layered compact palisade parenchyma, 2–3-cell-thick loose spongy parenchyma and transversal vascular bundles, etc. (Figure 3). After flooding treatment for 45 days, the anatomical structure of males and females were not affected significantly and palisade cells were still arranged regularly (Figure 3).

3.4. Gender-Specific Responses of Gas Exchange Parameters to Flooding

The gas exchange parameters, including Pn, gs, Ci, and E, were not significantly affected by flooding throughout the experiment, although they fluctuated over time (Figure 4). The male and female plants of S. viminalis also presented no obvious differences. In addition, the gas exchange parameters were not significantly affected by gender × flooding interaction.

3.5. Gender-Specific Responses of Chlorophyll Pigments to Flooding

The contents of Chl a, Chl b, and Car of S. viminalis plants were not significantly influenced by flooding treatment, and the three pigments also presented no significant difference between male and female plants (Figure 5). In addition, chlorophyll pigments were not significantly affected by gender × flooding interaction.

3.6. Gender-Specific Responses of Superoxide Free Radical and Lipid Peroxidation to Flooding

Flooding treatment led to increases in the production ratio of O2∙- and MDA contents of S. viminalis (Figure 6). The production ratio of O2∙- under flooding treatment was significantly higher than that of the control after 14 days, while MDA contents increased significantly after 30 days of flooding treatment. However, both the production ratios of O2∙- and MDA contents between male and female plants showed no significant differences. In addition, the two parameters were not significantly affected by gender × flooding interaction.

3.7. Gender-Specific Responses of Enzyme Activities to Flooding

Flooding treatment caused significant increases of SOD, POD, CAT, and APX activities in both male and female plants after 14 days, and the four enzyme activities were on the rise alongside the flooding treatment time (Figure 7). However, there were no significant differences between males and females of S. viminalis, neither in the control nor the flooding treatment. Besides, the enzyme activities were not significantly affected by gender × flooding interaction.

3.8. Gender-Specific Responses of Osmotic Regulation to Flooding

Compared with the control, the flooding treatment increased Pro and SP contents significantly in S. viminalis, but there were no obvious differences between male and female plants (Figure 8). The Pro contents increased continually as time went on, while the SP contents presented a fluctuating variation throughout the experiment. Furthermore, the Pro and SP contents were not significantly affected by gender × flooding interaction.

4. Discussion

4.1. Flooding Treatment Effects

4.1.1. Morphology, Growth, and Anatomical Structure

S. viminalis is a species of obligated riparian trees that are often distributed along streams and rivers and other wet areas [44]. In this research, we studied the response of males vs. females of S. viminalis in an artificial flooding treatment with water up to 4 cm above the soil surface. Hypertrophied lenticels and adventitious roots were induced after 3 days of flooding treatment, which are specific changes of flood-tolerant species [1,3]. The hypertrophied lenticels can contribute to air exchange between the stem and root of a plant and the atmosphere [1,45], while the adventitious roots can replace some functions of older damaged roots and help plants to uptake water and nutrients normally [24,46]. Symptoms of chlorosis and defoliation of leaves can also be induced by flooding treatment [1,47]. However, only yellow leaves of the flooded plants were observed in our study, which might indicate that S. viminalis is slightly damaged by long-time flooding treatment.
Flooding can bring about a reduction of plant height and root collar diameter, and the biomass of the leaf, stem, and root can also decrease [13,39,48,49]. In our study, flooding irritated the growth of the aboveground part, accompanied by taller plant height and thicker root collar diameter, which was consistent with the larger dry weight of the leaf and stem. However, the growth of the underground part was suppressed, along with a lighter dry weight of the root. Our results concerning morphology and biomass are consistent with previous findings of purpul osier (Salix integra Thunb.), Salix variegate Franch, and marsh bluegrass (Poa leptocoma Trin.) [38,50,51], which indicate that flooding has a negative effect on the root system, while it promotes the growth of the aerial part. The elongation of the stem might be an effective strategy for S. viminalis under our experimental conditions with a shallow water level, which might contribute to escaping from severe flooding [52,53,54]. In this study, morphological changes, including the emergence of hypertrophied lenticels and adventitious roots and accelerated aboveground growth, were conducive to adapting riparian zones for S. viminalis.
Anatomical characteristics are also important in improving the flooding tolerance of plants [55]. A previous study found that flooding-susceptible poplar displays an unstable anatomical structure in which the shape of palisade cells turns from long columns into circles [47]. However, the flooding-tolerant species still own regular palisade cells and are characterized by the presence of aerenchymatous tissue [47,56]. In our study, the anatomical structure of both male and female S. viminalis was not influenced by flooding, which could ensure the stability of the photosynthetic structure. However, aerenchymatous tissue was not observed in the leaves of S. viminalis, which might be due to the fact that CO2 could diffuse normally and so the formation aerenchymatous tissue was not initiated.

4.1.2. Photosynthesis

The photosynthetic rate generally decreases for non-flooding-tolerant species during the flooding period, and the earliest response is stomatal closure [15,49]. However, flooding-tolerant species can maintain a high level or even an unaffected photosynthetic rate [14,57]. Although the Pn of S. viminalis fluctuated over time, it was not significantly affected by flooding. The photosynthetic response of S. viminalis was in accordance with species of the same genus, such as S. integra cv. qingpi [1]. Usually, gs has a positive correlation with Pn [58], which also applied to this study. The high gs may increase gas exchange rates, as well as the total volumes, and hence plants assimilate more photosynthates for growth [59]. Also, the appearance of hypertrophied lenticels and adventitious roots in a short time is conducive to keeping the stoma open and maintaining an unaltered photosynthetic rate [60]. The pigment concentrations in the leaves of plants are closely associated with photosynthesis. Many previous studies have found that the Chl a, Chl b, and Car contents usually decline under flooding conditions, along with a reduction of photosynthesis [15,49,61]. However, the Chl a, Chl b, and Car contents in this study were unchanged, which could ensure the normal operation of photosynthesis. The observation of photosynthesis and chlorophyll indicate that S. viminalis were tolerant to flooding.

4.1.3. Oxidative Stress

Plants exposed to flooding conditions usually accumulate ROS, such as O2∙- [62]. The ROS react with unsaturated fatty acids, which results in destruction of the membranes, while MDA is the final production of membrane lipid peroxidation [62,63]. We observed an enhanced production ratio of O2∙- and MDA contents for both male and female S. viminalis plants under flooding treatment; the former and the later showed significant increases after 14 days and 30 days of treatment, respectively. Similar results have been shown in previous studies [19,64], and usually, the production ratios of O2∙- and MDA contents are positively correlated with flooding treatment time [64,65]. The increased production ratios of O2∙- and MDA contents can damage the membrane lipids and plants cells, break the cytomembrane structure, and cause oxidative stress [62,64,66]. Our results indicate that the flooding could induce oxidative stress and cause damage to the leaf cells of S. viminalis.

4.1.4. Antioxidant System

Plants have developed an antioxidant system, including a series of enzymes (SOD, POD, CAT, etc.) and substances to defend or alleviate the detrimental effect of ROS by metabolism under abiotic stresses [64]. Usually, the antioxidant enzyme activities are positively correlated with the self-protective ability of plants [67]. SOD is the first line of defense and it catalyzes the dismutation of O2∙- to O2 and H2O2 timely and effectively in the cytosol, chloroplasts, and mitochondria [34]. SOD activity significantly increased after 14 days of flooding treatment in this study, suggesting that the detoxification of O2∙- in S. viminalis is effective. POD, CAT, and APX can catalyze the decomposition of H2O2 to water and oxygen, eventually clearing up H2O2 in cells [23,34,64]. The three enzymes increased significantly in our study, which contributed to neutralizing the product H2O2 from the previous SOD. Similar result has been obtained in açai berry (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) [62] treated with flooding. The enhanced activities of antioxidant enzymes could increase the antioxidant ability of S. viminalis, and thus were helpful to reduce oxidative stress.

4.1.5. Osmotic Substances

Osmotic adjustment has been regarded as one of the most crucial protective mechanisms for plants to adapt to stressful environments, while Pro and SP are major osmotic substances [16,34]. Pro can act as a cell protector and reducer of osmotic potential, which is involved in many cellular processes to keep a balance of ROS [19]. SP is also an important osmotic protective substance that plays a role in regulating osmotic potential [68]. Previous studies have found that flooding significantly increases Pro content in the leaves of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.) [69] and bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc) [70], while accumulated SP has been discovered in Acorus tatarinowii Schott under flooding conditions [71]. Accumulated Pro and SP contents were observed in our study, indicating that osmotic adjustment was irritated and acted as an effective way for S. viminalis to respond to flooding. However, there is some dispute about the accumulation of Pro. An et al. [21] found that Pro accumulation does not contribute to maintaining water balance and it may be an indicator of injury for fig leaves under flooding condition.

4.2. Gender-Specific Responses

It is generally assumed that differences exist in males and females of dioecious plants due to different resource allocation, i.e., that females apply more resources in defense while males invest more resources in growth [72,73]. Gender differences usually appear or are greater under adverse conditions [74], and such differences exist in many plants, such as Populus cathayana [35], European aspen (Populus tremula L.) [75], and grey willow (Salix glauca L.) [76]. Gender-specific differences in flooding resistance vary in plant species, even when the plants are in the same genus. A previous study showed that males of eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides Marsh) have better cellular defense mechanisms against damage caused by waterlogging stress, whereas females are more responsive to waterlogging stress [48]. In S. variegate, the males can adjust more flexibly their resource allocation, and so they are more tolerant to flooding [77]. However, the female plants of P. angustifolia are more tolerant to flooding, which is strengthened by the increased occurrence of female cottonwoods in streamside zones [39,40]. The favored occurrence of female plants in wetter sites is also apparent in some willows, and it is observed that female willows grow more vigorously than males [78,79].
In our study, flooding treatment caused morphological and physiological changes in S. viminalis, but male and female plants performed similarly and no significant gender-specific differences were discovered. This result is different from previous studies on gender differences of S. viminalis, which found that female plants may be more severely affected by fungal pathogens and high temperatures than males [80,81]. However, gender differences of S. myrsinifolia are not much affected by simulated climatic changes (enhanced CO2 and temperature or their combination) at the pre-reproductive stage [73], and no specific difference was found in P. angustifolia in response to seasonal changes in water availability [82]. In our study, no obvious differences were found between the two genders, suggesting that similar patterns of morphology, anatomy, and physiology may be adopted by the two genders to co-exist in riparian zones, which is consistent with two dioecious riparian shrub species, namely, Salix myrsinifolia and Salix lapponum [83]. Besides, all plants survived 45 days of flooding with no leaf abscission, fast growth aboveground, unaffected photosynthesis, and strong antioxidant capacity and osmotic adjustment ability, which suggests that both male and female plants of S. viminalis are flood-tolerant. Thus, it is concluded that the greater frequency of females in riparian zones is not influenced by flooding, and other factors, such as demographic parameters, could also influence the spatial distribution of genders [84].To better understand the response of male and female S. viminalis to flooding, further studies at the level of molecular biology are needed.

5. Conclusions

The combination of morphological, anatomical, and physiological parameters can help us to better understand the gender-specific responses of S. viminalis to flooding. The present study suggests that the growth of plant height and root collar diameter is stimulated by flooding treatment, accompanied by increased dry weight of the aboveground part. The little-affected photosynthesis could guarantee the rapid growth of plants, while the unaffected leaf anatomical structure and photosynthetic pigment contents could ensure the normal operation of photosynthetic apparatus. However, the dry weight of the underground part decreased at the end of the experiment, which might be owing to the fact that the primary root stopped growing. The flooding treatment caused oxidative stress in S. viminalis, but they could resist the stress by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities and osmotic adjustment ability. Different from our expectation, gender-specific differences in S. viminalis were not obviously detected, and the male and female plants performed similarly to flooding. Comprehensive indicators indicate that both male and female plants of S. viminalis are tolerant to flooding, which would guarantee a sustainable population and maintain a stable riparian ecosystem. Thus, both male and female plants of S. viminalis could be planted in frequent flooding zones.

Author Contributions

F.-f.Z. and Z.-y.S. designed the study. F.-f.Z., H.-d.L., S.-w.Z., and Z.-j.L. performed the experiments. J.-x.L., Y.-q.Q., and G.-s.J. analyzed the data. F.-f.Z. and H.-d.L. wrote the original draft. Y.-x.Z., L.L., L.H., and Z.-y.S. revised and edited the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31700533), the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (grant number CAFYBB2018ZB002), the Key Technologies R & D Program of Henan Province (grant numbers 182102310052 and 192102310307), and the Doctoral Scientific Fund Project of Henan Polytechnic University (grant number B2017-40).

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Xia Li, Zhi-cheng Chen, Ping Li and Jun-chao Xing (Chinese Academy of Forestry) for performing the research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, C.; Tao, X.; Xu, X. Growth, leaf gas exchange, and chlorophyll fluorescence responses of two cultivars of Salix integra Thunb, to waterlogging stress. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. Iran 2014, 16, 137–149. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey-Serres, J.; Colmer, T.D. Plant tolerance of flooding stress-recent advances. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 2211–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Striker, G.G. Flooding stress on plants: Anatomical, morphological and physiological responses. Botany 2012, 1, 3–28. [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnell, N.; Liu, C. Climate change 2001: Hydrology and water resources. In Report Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001; Available online: http://www.ipcc.ch/ (accessed on 18 January 2019).
  5. Lee, K.W.; Chen, P.W.; Lu, C.A.; Chen, S.; Ho, T.H.D.; Yu, S.M. Coordinated responses to oxygen and sugar deficiency allow rice seedlings to tolerate flooding. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2, ra61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bailey-Serres, J.; Voesenek, L. Flooding stress: Acclimations and genetic diversity. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 313–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Setter, T.; Waters, I.; Sharma, S.; Singh, K.; Kulshreshtha, N.; Yaduvanshi, N.; Ram, P.; Singh, B.; Rane, J.; McDonald, G. Review of wheat improvement for waterlogging tolerance in Australia and India: The importance of anaerobiosis and element toxicities associated with different soils. Ann. Bot.-London 2009, 103, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Chen, X.; Visser, E.J.; de Kroon, H.; Pierik, R.; Voesenek, L.A.; Huber, H. Fitness consequences of natural variation in flooding-induced shoot elongation in Rumex palustris. New Phytol. 2011, 190, 409–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Imaz, J.A.; Giménez, D.O.; Grimoldi, A.A.; Striker, G.G. The effects of submergence on anatomical, morphological and biomass allocation responses of tropical grasses Chloris gayana and Panicum coloratum at seedling stage. Crop Pasture Sci. 2013, 63, 1145–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shukor, N.-N.; Abdul-Hamid, H.; Abdu, A.; Ismail, M.-K. Waterlogging effects on growth and physiological characteristics of Azadirachta excelsa seedlings. Am. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 9, 78–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. De Oliveira, V.C.; Joly, C.A. Flooding tolerance of Calophyllum brasiliense Camb.(Clusiaceae): Morphological, physiological and growth responses. Trees 2010, 24, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Parad, G.A.; Zarafshar, M.; Striker, G.G.; Sattarian, A. Some physiological and morphological responses of Pyrus boissieriana to flooding. Trees 2013, 27, 1387–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Azizi, S.; Tabari, M.; Striker, G.G. Growth, physiology, and leaf ion concentration responses to long-term flooding with fresh or saline water of Populus euphratica. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 108, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kreuzwieser, J.; Rennenberg, H. Molecular and physiological responses of trees to waterlogging stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 2245–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yu, B.; Zhao, C.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Peng, G. Morphological, physiological, and biochemical responses of Populus euphratica to soil flooding. Photosynthetica 2015, 53, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yordanova, R.Y.; Popova, L.P. Flooding-induced changes in photosynthesis and oxidative status in maize plants. Acta Physiol. Plant 2007, 29, 535–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pereira, F.J.; Magalhães, P.C.; Souza, T.C.D.; Castro, E.M.D.; Alves, J.D. Antioxidant system activity and aerenchyma formation in’Saracura’maize roots. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2010, 45, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shabala, S. Physiological and cellular aspects of phytotoxicity tolerance in plants: The role of membrane transporters and implications for crop breeding for waterlogging tolerance. New Phytol. 2011, 190, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pérez-Jiménez, M.; Hernández-Munuera, M.; Piñero, M.C.; López-Ortega, G.; del Amor, F.M. Are commercial sweet cherry rootstocks adapted to climate change? Short-term waterlogging and CO2 effects on sweet cherry cv.‘Burlat’. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 908–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. An, Y.Y.; Liang, Z.S.; Zhao, R.K.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.J. Organ-dependent responses of Periploca sepium to repeated dehydration and rehydration. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2011, 77, 446–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. An, Y.; Qi, L.; Wang, L. ALA Pretreatment improves waterlogging tolerance of fig plants. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lekshmy, S.; Jha, S.K.; Sairam, R.K. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of flooding tolerance in plants. In Elucidation of Abiotic Stress Signaling in Plants; Pandey, G.K., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 227–242. [Google Scholar]
  23. Saha, R.; Ahmed, F.; Mokarroma, N.; Rohman, M.; Golder, P. Physiological and biochemical changes in waterlog tolerant sesame genotypes. SAARC J. Agri. 2016, 14, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Vwioko, E.; Adinkwu, O.; El-Esawi, M.A. Comparative physiological, biochemical, and genetic responses to prolonged waterlogging stress in okra and maize given exogenous ethylene priming. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, Y.; Chen, S.; Li, Y.; Chen, S.; Guo, Z. Physiological response of Phyllostachys rivalis rhizome roots to long-term water stress. For. Res. 2014, 27, 621–625. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kutschera, U.; Niklas, K.J. Julius von Sachs’ forgotten 1897-article: Sexuality and gender in plants vs. humans. Plant Signal. Behav. 2018, 13, e1489671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Renner, S.S. The relative and absolute frequencies of angiosperm sexual systems: Dioecy, monoecy, gynodioecy, and an updated online database. Am. J. Bot. 2014, 101, 1588–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Jiang, H.; Peng, S.; Zhang, S.; Li, X.; Korpelainen, H.; Li, C. Transcriptional profiling analysis in Populus yunnanensis provides insights into molecular mechanisms of sexual differences in salinity tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3709–3726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hawkins, T.S.; Schiff, N.M.; Leininger, T.D.; Gardiner, E.S.; Devall, M.S.; Hamel, P.B.; Wilson, A.D.; Connor, K.F. Growth and intraspecific competitive abilities of the dioecious Lindera melissifolia (Lauraceae) in varied flooding regimes. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 2009, 136, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kutschera, U. Sex-gender-conflicts in aquatic hermaphrodites: Are genes immortal? J. Marine Sci. Res. Dev. 2017, 7, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Dawson, T.E.; Ehleringer, J.R. Gender-specific physiology, carbon isotope discrimination, and habitat distribution in boxelder, Acer Negundo. Ecology 1993, 74, 798–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, H.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Korpelainen, H.; Li, C. Nitrogen deposition limits photosynthetic response to elevated CO2 differentially in a dioecious species. Oecologia 2011, 165, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Chen, F.; Chen, L.; Zhao, H.; Korpelainen, H.; Li, C. Sex-specific responses and tolerances of Populus cathayana to salinity. Physiol. Plant. 2010, 140, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, S.; Chen, L.; Duan, B.; Korpelainen, H.; Li, C. Populus cathayana males exhibit more efficient protective mechanisms than females under drought stress. For. Ecol. Manag. 2012, 275, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Han, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, X.; Korpelainen, H.; Li, C. Sexual differences in photosynthetic activity, ultrastructure and phytoremediation potential of Populus cathayana exposed to lead and drought. Tree Physiol. 2013, 33, 1043–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Zhao, Y.; Luo, Y.; Zong, S.; Wang, R.; Luo, H. Comparison in leaf anatomical structure and drought resistance of different sex and varieties of sea buckthorn. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2012, 34, 34–41. [Google Scholar]
  37. Randriamanana, T.R.; Nissinen, K.; Moilanen, J.; Nybakken, L.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R. Long-term UV-B and temperature enhancements suggest that females of Salix myrsinifolia plants are more tolerant to UV-B than males. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 109, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cao, Y.; Ma, C.; Chen, G.; Zhang, J.; Xing, B. Physiological and biochemical responses of Salix integra Thunb. under copper stress as affected by soil flooding. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 225, 644–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nielsen, J.L.; Rood, S.B.; Pearce, D.W.; Letts, M.G.; Jiskoot, H. Streamside trees: Responses of male, female and hybrid cottonwoods to flooding. Tree Physiol. 2010, 30, 1479–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Rood, S.B.; Nielsen, J.L.; Shenton, L.; Gill, K.M.; Letts, M.G. Effects of flooding on leaf development, transpiration, and photosynthesis in narrowleaf cottonwood, a willow-like poplar. Photosynth. Res. 2010, 104, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jackson, M.B.; Attwood, P.A. Roots of willow (Salix viminalis L.) show marked tolerance to oxygen shortage in flooded soils and in solution culture. Plant Soil 1996, 187, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lichtenthaler, H.K. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic membranes. Method. Enzymol. 1987, 148, 350–383. [Google Scholar]
  43. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teare, I. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Berlin, S.; Fogelqvist, J.; Lascoux, M.; Lagercrantz, U.; Rönnberg-Wästljung, A.C. Polymorphism and divergence in two willow species, Salix viminalis L. and Salix schwerinii E. Wolf. G3 Genes Genom. Genet. 2011, 1, 387–400. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kozlowski, T.; Pallardy, S. Acclimation and adaptive responses of woody plants to environmental stresses. Bot. Rev. 2002, 68, 270–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sasidharan, R.; Voesenek, L.A. Ethylene-mediated acclimations to flooding stress. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Peng, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Tong, R.; Hu, X.; Du, K. Anatomy and ultrastructure adaptations to soil flooding of two full-sib poplar clones differing in flood-tolerance. Flora 2017, 233, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, F.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Deng, W.; Liao, L.; Li, M. Different eco-physiological responses between male and female Populus deltoides clones to waterlogging stress. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 262, 1963–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Du, K.; Xu, L.; Wu, H.; Tu, B.; Zheng, B. Ecophysiological and morphological adaption to soil flooding of two poplar clones differing in flood-tolerance. Flora 2012, 207, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Adams, A.E.; Kazenel, M.R.; Rudgers, J.A. Does a foliar endophyte improve plant fitness under flooding? Plant Ecol. 2017, 218, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lei, S.; Zeng, B.; Xu, S.; Zhang, X. Response of basal metabolic rate to complete submergence of riparian species Salix variegata in the Three Gorges reservoir region. Sci. Rep. UK 2017, 7, 13885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Perata, P.; Armstrong, W.; Voesenek, L.A. Plants and flooding stress. New Phytol. 2011, 190, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Phukan, U.J.; Mishra, S.; Shukla, R.K. Waterlogging and submergence stress: Affects and acclimation. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2016, 36, 956–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ye, X.Q.; Zeng, B.; Meng, J.L.; Wu, M.; Zhang, X.P. Responses in shoot elongation, carbohydrate utilization and growth recovery of an invasive species to submergence at different water temperatures. Sci. Rep. UK 2018, 8, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Schmull, M.; Thomas, F.M. Morphological and physiological reactions of young deciduous trees (Quercus robur L., Q. petraea [Matt.] Liebl, Fagus sylvatica L.) to waterlogging. Plant Soil 2000, 225, 227–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yin, D.; Zhang, Z.; Luo, H. Anatomical responses to waterlogging in Chrysanthemum zawadskii. Sci. Hortic. Amst. 2012, 146, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Elcan, J.; Pezeshki, S. Effects of flooding on susceptibility of Taxodium distichum L. seedlings to drought. Photosynthetica 2002, 40, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bertolde, F.; Almeida, A.A.; Pirovani, C.; Gomes, F.; Ahnert, D.; Baligar, V.; Valle, R. Physiological and biochemical responses of Theobroma cacao L. genotypes to flooding. Photosynthetica 2012, 50, 447–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, C.X.; Wei, H.; Geng, Y.H.; Schneider, R. Effects of submergence on photosynthesis and growth of Pterocarya stenoptera (Chinese wingnut) seedlings in the recently-created Three Gorges Reservoir region of China. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 18, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Herrera, A. Responses to flooding of plant water relations and leaf gas exchange in tropical tolerant trees of a black-water wetland. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zhou, C.; Bai, T.; Wang, Y.; Wu, T.; Zhang, X.; Xu, X.; Han, Z. Morpholoical and enzymatic responses to waterlogging in three Prunus species. Sci. Hortic. Amst. 2017, 221, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pereira, E.S.; Silva, O.N.; Argemiro Filho, P.; Felipe, J.P.; Alves, G.A.; Lobato, A.K. Antioxidant enzymes efficiently control leaf and root cell damage in young Euterpe oleracea plants exposed to waterlogging. Ind. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 20, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lin, K.H.; Kuo, W.S.; Chiang, C.M.; Hsiung, T.C.; Chiang, M.C.; Lo, H.F. Study of sponge gourd ascorbate peroxidase and winter squash superoxide dismutase under respective flooding and chilling stresses. Scientia Hortic. Amst. 2013, 162, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Yu, M.; Zhou, Z.; Deng, X.; Li, J.; Mei, F.; Qi, Y. Physiological mechanism of programmed cell death aggravation and acceleration in wheat endosperm cells caused by waterlogging. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2017, 39, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, M.; Jiang, Y. Genotypic variation in growth and metabolic responses of perennial ryegrass exposed to short-term waterlogging and submergence stress. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2015, 95, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Arbona, V.; Hossain, Z.; López-Climent, M.F.; Pérez-Clemente, R.M.; Gómez-Cadenas, A. Antioxidant enzymatic activity is linked to waterlogging stress tolerance in citrus. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 132, 452–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Reddy, A.R.; Chaitanya, K.V.; Vivekanandan, M. Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2004, 161, 1189–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ma, L.T.; Chen, S.L. Physiological responses of Guadua amplexifolia to NaCl stress. Chinese J. Ecol. 2008, 27, 1487–1491. [Google Scholar]
  69. Duhan, S.; Kumari, A.; Bala, S.; Sharma, N.; Sheokand, S. Effects of waterlogging, salinity and their combination on stress indices and yield attributes in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.) genotypes. Ind. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 23, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vurayai, R.; Emongor, V.; Moseki, B. Physiological responses of bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc) to short periods of water stress during different developmental stages. Asian J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 3, 37–43. [Google Scholar]
  71. Ji, X.M.; Xu, L.; Xie, Y.F.; Guo, C.X.; Chen, W.D. Effects of soil water conditions on growth and physiology of Acorus tatarinowii Schott. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 2013, 26, 2285–2288. [Google Scholar]
  72. Jing, S.W.; Coley, P.D. Dioecy and herbivory: The effect of growth rate on plant defense in Acer negundo. Oikos 1990, 58, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nybakken, L.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R. Gender differences in Salix myrsinifolia at the pre-reproductive stage are little affected by simulated climatic change. Physiol. Plant. 2012, 147, 465–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Montesinos, D.; Villar-Salvador, P.; García-Fayos, P.; Verdú, M. Genders in Juniperus thurifera have different functional responses to variations in nutrient availability. New Phytol. 2012, 193, 705–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Randriamanana, T.R.; Nybakken, L.; Lavola, A.; Aphalo, P.J.; Nissinen, K.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R. Sex-related differences in growth and carbon allocation to defence in Populus tremula as explained by current plant defence theories. Tree Physiol. 2014, 34, 471–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Dudley, L.S.; Galen, C. Stage-dependent patterns of drought tolerance and gas exchange vary between sexes in the alpine willow, Salix glauca. Oecologia 2007, 153, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Su, X.; Zeng, B.; Lin, F.; Qiao, P.; Ayi, Q.; Huang, W. How does long-term complete submergence influence sex ratio and resource allocation of a dioecious shrub, Salix variegata Franch.? Ecol. Eng. 2016, 87, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ueno, N.; Seiwa, K. Gender-specific shoot structure and functions in relation to habitat conditions in a dioecious tree, Salix sachalinensis. J. For. Res. 2003, 8, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tozawa, M.; Ueno, N.; Seiwa, K. Compensatory mechanisms for reproductive costs in the dioecious tree Salix integra. Botany 2009, 87, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Moritz, K.K.; Björkman, C.; Parachnowitsch, A.L.; Stenberg, J.A. Female Salix viminalis are more severely infected by Melampsora spp. but neither sex experiences associational effects. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 6, 1154–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Zhai, F.F.; Liu, J.X.; Mao, J.M.; Peng, X.Y.; Han, L.; Sun, Z.Y. Physiological differences and variations in male and female plants of Salix viminalis under high temperature stress. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2016, 38, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  82. Letts, M.G.; Phelan, C.A.; Johnson, D.R.; Rood, S.B. Seasonal photosynthetic gas exchange and leaf reflectance characteristics of male and female cottonwoods in a riparian woodland. Tree Physiol. 2008, 28, 1037–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Hughes, F.M.R.; Johnamsson, M.; Xiong, S.; Carlborg, E.; Hawkins, D.; Svedmark, M.; Hayes, A.; Goodall, A.; Richards, K.S.; Nilsson, C. The influence of hydrological regimes on sex ratios and spatial segregation of the sexes in two dioecious riparian shrub species in northern Sweden. Plant Ecol. 2010, 208, 77–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ueno, N.; Suyama, Y.; Seiwa, K. What makes the sex ratio female-biased in the dioecious tree Salix sachalinensis? J. Ecol. 2007, 95, 951–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The plant height (a) and root collar diameter (b) of male vs. female Salix viminalis plants at different times of flooding treatment. Note: The data are the mean ± standard deviation (SD) from five replicates. Different small letters indicate significant differences between treatments at the same time point according to Duncan tests (p < 0.05). CK, control; FT, flooding treatment; M, male; F, female; PG, gender effect; PF, flooding effect; PG×F, gender and flooding interaction effect.
Figure 1. The plant height (a) and root collar diameter (b) of male vs. female Salix viminalis plants at different times of flooding treatment. Note: The data are the mean ± standard deviation (SD) from five replicates. Different small letters indicate significant differences between treatments at the same time point according to Duncan tests (p < 0.05). CK, control; FT, flooding treatment; M, male; F, female; PG, gender effect; PF, flooding effect; PG×F, gender and flooding interaction effect.
Forests 11 00321 g001
Figure 2. The dry weight of primary root, adventitious root, total root, stem, leaf, and sapling (total) of male vs. female Salix viminalis plants at the end of flooding treatment. PR, primary root; AR, adventitious root; TR, total root.
Figure 2. The dry weight of primary root, adventitious root, total root, stem, leaf, and sapling (total) of male vs. female Salix viminalis plants at the end of flooding treatment. PR, primary root; AR, adventitious root; TR, total root.
Forests 11 00321 g002
Figure 3. Leaf cross-sections of male vs. female Salix viminalis plants at 45 days of flooding treatment. Observations were done using th NIKON ECLIPSE E100 microscope at 20 × Magnification. Scale bars = 50 μm. PP, palisade parenchyma; SP, spongy parenchyma; TVB, transcurrent vascular bundle.
Figure 3. Leaf cross-sections of male vs. female Salix viminalis plants at 45 days of flooding treatment. Observations were done using th NIKON ECLIPSE E100 microscope at 20 × Magnification. Scale bars = 50 μm. PP, palisade parenchyma; SP, spongy parenchyma; TVB, transcurrent vascular bundle.
Forests 11 00321 g003
Figure 4. Net photosynthesis rate (Pn) (a), stomatal conductance (gs) (b), intracellular CO2 concentration (Ci) (c), and transpiration rate (E) (d) of male vs. female Salix viminalis plants at different times of flooding treatment.
Figure 4. Net photosynthesis rate (Pn) (a), stomatal conductance (gs) (b), intracellular CO2 concentration (Ci) (c), and transpiration rate (E) (d) of male vs. female Salix viminalis plants at different times of flooding treatment.
Forests 11 00321 g004aForests 11 00321 g004b
Figure 5. Chlorophyll a (Chl a) (a), Chlorophyll b (Chl b) (b), and Carotenoids (Car) (c) contents of male vs. female Salix viminalis plants at different times of flooding treatment.
Figure 5. Chlorophyll a (Chl a) (a), Chlorophyll b (Chl b) (b), and Carotenoids (Car) (c) contents of male vs. female Salix viminalis plants at different times of flooding treatment.
Forests 11 00321 g005
Figure 6. Production ratio of superoxide free radical (O2∙-) (a) and malondialdehyde (MDA) (b) contents of male vs. female Salix viminalis plants at different times of flooding treatment.
Figure 6. Production ratio of superoxide free radical (O2∙-) (a) and malondialdehyde (MDA) (b) contents of male vs. female Salix viminalis plants at different times of flooding treatment.
Forests 11 00321 g006
Figure 7. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) (a), peroxidase (POD) (b), catalase (CAT) (c), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) (d) activities of male vs. female Salix viminalis plants at different times of flooding treatment.
Figure 7. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) (a), peroxidase (POD) (b), catalase (CAT) (c), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) (d) activities of male vs. female Salix viminalis plants at different times of flooding treatment.
Forests 11 00321 g007
Figure 8. Proline (Pro) (a) and solute protein (SP) (b) contents of male vs. female Salix viminalis plants at different times of flooding treatment.
Figure 8. Proline (Pro) (a) and solute protein (SP) (b) contents of male vs. female Salix viminalis plants at different times of flooding treatment.
Forests 11 00321 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhai, F.-f.; Li, H.-d.; Zhang, S.-w.; Li, Z.-j.; Liu, J.-x.; Qian, Y.-q.; Ju, G.-s.; Zhang, Y.-x.; Liu, L.; Han, L.; et al. Male and Female Plants of Salix viminalis Perform Similarly to Flooding in Morphology, Anatomy, and Physiology. Forests 2020, 11, 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11030321

AMA Style

Zhai F-f, Li H-d, Zhang S-w, Li Z-j, Liu J-x, Qian Y-q, Ju G-s, Zhang Y-x, Liu L, Han L, et al. Male and Female Plants of Salix viminalis Perform Similarly to Flooding in Morphology, Anatomy, and Physiology. Forests. 2020; 11(3):321. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11030321

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhai, Fei-fei, Hai-dong Li, Shao-wei Zhang, Zhen-jian Li, Jun-xiang Liu, Yong-qiang Qian, Guan-sheng Ju, Yun-xing Zhang, Long Liu, Lei Han, and et al. 2020. "Male and Female Plants of Salix viminalis Perform Similarly to Flooding in Morphology, Anatomy, and Physiology" Forests 11, no. 3: 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11030321

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop