Next Article in Journal
Why Do Beavers Leave Home? Lodge Abandonment in an Invasive Population in Patagonia
Previous Article in Journal
Predicting the Potential Distribution of Two Varieties of Litsea coreana (Leopard-Skin Camphor) in China under Climate Change
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Liriodendron chinense MKK2 Gene Enhances Arabidopsis thaliana Salt Resistance

1
Key Laboratory of Forest Genetics & Biotechnology of Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
Suzhou Polytechnic Institute of Agriculture, Suzhou 215008, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2020, 11(11), 1160; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111160
Submission received: 29 September 2020 / Revised: 29 October 2020 / Accepted: 29 October 2020 / Published: 31 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Ecophysiology and Biology)

Abstract

:
To adapt and sense environmental perturbations, including a variety of biotic and abiotic stress conditions, plants have developed disparate regulatory pathways. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK or MPK) signaling cascades are found widespread across the eukaryotic kingdoms of life. In plants, they may regulate signaling pathways aimed at resisting the stressful effects of low temperature, salt damage, drought, touch, and mechanical damage. To date, no conclusive studies into Liriodendron chinense (Hemsl.) Sarg MPK-related stress resistance signaling have been performed. In our study, we cloned three homologous L. chinense MAP kinase kinase family genes: LcMKK2, LcMKK4, and LcMKK6. LcMKK2 and LcMKK6 have their highest expression level in the root, while LcMKK4 is highly expressed in the stem. LcMKK2 showed upregulation in response to salt and cold stress conditions in L. chinense. To further analyze its gene function, we overexpressed LcMKK2 in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. and obtained transgenic plants. Overexpression of LcMKK2 caused a significant reduction in plant mortality (from 96% to 70%) in response to a 7-day 200 mM NaCl treatment. Therefore, we conclude that LcMKK2 is involved in a signaling response to salt stress, and it could thus prove an effective target gene for breeding strategies to improve Liriodendron salt tolerance.

1. Introduction

Salt stress has a negative role in most plant growth and development; high salt causes a change in the osmotic potential or ion balance between the plant and its exterior environment, causing a water deficit and plant wilting. Subsequent leaf or root damage will eventually lead to plant death [1]. To respond to biotic or abiotic stresses, including salt stress, plants use a set of sophisticated signaling pathways [2]. Currently, the most studied salt stress regulatory pathways mainly include the MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) signal pathway [3], the Ca2+ signaling transduction pathway [4], and the ABA signal pathway [5]. In recent years, genetic engineering has been widely used as an effective tool for improving the target plant’s abilities in dealing with environmental stresses [6]. Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are one of the largest groups of transferases, catalyzing phosphorylation of appropriate protein substrates on serine or threonine residues [7]. Transient activation of MAPK cascades is one of the first conserved defense responses playing an early triggering role in resistance caused by metabolic changes and transcriptional reprogramming [8]. MAPKs cascades are involved in signaling pathways that respond to various stresses, such as temperature stress or salt stress [9].
A typical MAPK cascade consists of at least three sequentially acting serine/threonine kinases; one MAP kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKK), one MAP kinase kinase (MAPKK), and finally, the MAP kinase (MAPK) itself, with each phosphorylating and thereby activating the next kinase in the cascade [10]. In 1986, Sturgll and Ray [11] first discovered a MAPK in animal cells. Over the next 20 years, a large number of studies have gradually revealed MAPK-related signal transduction pathways in eukaryotes. The exploration of plant MAPK signaling began in the 1990s, starting relatively late but developing very rapidly [12]. The first MAPK gene was isolated and identified from plants in 1993 [12]. In Arabidopsis, studies have revealed the existence of 20 MAPKs, 10 MAPK kinases, and 60 MAPK kinase kinases [13]. The rice (Oryza sativa) genome contains 17 MAPK, 8 MAPKK, and 75 MAPKKK genes [14], whereas the poplar (Populus trichocarpa) genome contains 21 MAPK and 10 MAPKK genes [15]. This indicates that a large number of MAPK cascade kinase genes are prevalent in plants.
In plants, MAPKK families have diverged into four major groups (A, B, C, and D) [15]. Taking Arabidopsis as a reference, group A includes MAPKK1 (MKK1) and MKK2 that act upstream of MPK4 [16]. Extensive genetic studies show that the MEKK1-MKK1/2-MPK4 cascade plays a role in negatively regulating temperature-dependent resistance through maintaining endogenous levels of salicylic acid (SA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) and preventing programmed cell death [17]. MKK2 is also implicated in responses to cold and salinity, and both MKK1 and MKK2 mediate innate immunity responses [18,19]. In banana (Musa spp.), the MKK2 gene acts as a cold resistance gene [20]. MKK group B in Arabidopsis, including the gene MKK3, can be distinguished because of the presence of a nuclear transfer factor (NTF) domain [21]. Group C includes MKK4 and MKK5, while group D consists of the remaining MKKs (MKK7–10); the genes in these two groups contain no intron [19].
Plant MKK phosphorylation sites consist of the consensus sequence S/TxxxxxS/T, whereas the mammalian equivalent can be represented as S/TxxxS/T [13]. Interestingly, this conserved sequence does not occur in Arabidopsis MKK10 due to a three-amino-acid residue deletion in this region [13]. MKK proteins contain conserved sequences that can be phosphorylated by upstream MAPKKKs, which in turn phosphorylate the Thr and Tyr residues of the T-X-Y motif in downstream MAPKs [22]. Once activated, MPKs phosphorylate diverse substrates mainly located in the cytosol and nucleus to regulate protein function and gene expression for the appropriate cellular response [23]. Therefore, as an intermediate step in plants, MAPKKs play an extremely important role in the MAPK signal transduction pathway.
Studies have shown that the signaling pathway of cellular MKK2 phosphorylation contributes to abiotic stress tolerance that likely serves as a universal plant cold tolerance mechanism, phosphorylation of Arabidopsis thaliana MEKK1 via Ca2+ signaling is a part of the cold stress response, and membrane rigidification functions upstream of the MEKK1-MKK2-MPK4 cascade during cold acclimation in A. thaliana [24]. The AtMKK2 gene is involved in many stress responses in plants, including salt stress and low temperature stress responses [25].
Liriodendron chinense (Hemsl.) Sarg, a well-known forest tree, belongs to the Liriodendron L. genus in the Magnoliaceae family. L. chinense has been identified as a precious commercial tree species with a fast growth rate and good wood texture [26]. It is an excellent tree species for barren mountain industrial timber and also a garden ornamental with great market potential [27]. The publication of the genome of L. chinense has greatly promoted the study of this valuable tree, but no comprehensive studies on genes related to stress response in this species have been reported thus far. The current lack of knowledge on how MAPK cascade genes function in Liriodendron limits their use in genetic improvement programs. In this study, we first report the cloning of L. chinense MAPKK genes. Because of the limitation of the forest tree transgenic system, Arabidopsis was used to study the basic functions of the LcMKK2 gene using cross-species transgenesis. We found that the overexpression of the LcMKK2 gene can improve salt tolerance in Arabidopsis, indicating that this gene may play a similar role in Liriodendron.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials, Culture Conditions, and Salt Treatment

2.1.1. L. chinense

The different tissues used in this study were harvested from an adult plant of L. chinense growing at the Nanjing Forestry University campus and were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for RNA extraction. We used this RNA for gene cloning and qPCR experiments of expression in different parts of L. chinense. The tissue cultures of L. chinense grown in the bottle for 1 month were used for cold and salt stress treatments. Two-month old L. chinense plants were grown under room temperature and 4 °C for 48 h. Then, the first or second true leaves were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C.

2.1.2. A. thaliana

The A. thaliana Columbia ecotype was used for this study. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants were obtained via the floral dip method [28]. Transgenic and wild-type Arabidopsis seeds were sterilized, then plated on ½ Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium with Kanamycin (Kan), and grown for 7 days until the first or second true leaves appeared. Transgenic plants overexpressing the LcMKK2 gene in the T2 generation were genotyped by PCR, after which transgenic plants were transferred onto nutrient soil. After growing in the soil for 2 weeks, the samples were collected for qPCR after being treated with 300 mmol/L NaCl for 2 h. In order to better observe the root system and phenotype of transgenic plants, we treated the transgenic plants under salt stress in ½ MS medium. For observing LcMKK2-overexpressing plants, three lines were selected. The NaCl concentration gradient used was 0, 100, and 200 mmol/L. Each treatment was repeated three times with 50 seeds per treatment.

2.1.3. LcMKK2, LcMKK4, and LcMKK6 Gene Cloning

Total RNA was extracted from L. chinense leaves using the RNA extraction kit (Bioteke RP3301, Beijing, China) following the manual: (1) 100 mg leaves were completely grinded with liquid nitrogen in a mortar treated with 0.1% DEPC; (2) the lysis solution and β-mercaptoethanol were added into the sample; (3) after completely splitting, the nucleosomes were decomposed after incubation at 65 °C for 5 min; (4) after centrifugation under 12,000 rpm for 5 min, the supernatant was transferred into a new centrifuge tube; (5) 70% ethanol was added into the supernatant with equal volume; (6) the RNA was harvested with the adsorption column, which was digested with DNase I (Takara RR4201, Japan) at 37 °C for 20 min; (7) clean RNA was washed out with RNase-free H2O. RNA quality was tested using electrophoresis and ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Integral RNA without DNA contamination was applied for double-stranded cDNA synthesis using reverse transcriptase according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Vazyme Biotech Co R312-02, Nanjing, China). The first-strand cDNA was synthesized with 1 μg RNA as template at 25 °C for 5 min, 37 °C for 45 min, and 85 °C for 5 s. We used Primer 5.0 [29] software to design primers, which are shown in Supplementary Table S1. The TOYOBO’s KODPLUS high-fidelity enzyme was used for DNA amplification. A 1.2 Kb band was obtained, which was consistent with the predicted size. The fragment-added poly (A) tail was ligated with the cloning vector PMD19-T Vector (Takara, Japan) and transferred to Escherichia coli for sequencing. XbaI and SacI double restriction sites were selected as the sites for ligation of the LcMKK2 gene to expression vector pBI121. The primers used for ligation are listed in Supplementary Table S2.

2.1.4. Quantitative qPCR Analyses

A Revert Aid Premium First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit was obtained from Vazyme (Vazyme Biotech Co, Nanjing, China); a SYBR Green PCR master mix kit was purchased from Takara. Total RNA isolation and reverse transcription were performed as mentioned above. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using a SYBR-Green PCR Mastermix on a LightCycler® 480 real-time PCR detection system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Three independent real-time PCR experiments were carried out. Sequence-specific primers were designed using Primer 5.0 [29] and Oligo 7 [30] and are listed in Supplementary Table S3. Each PCR reaction was repeated three times, and the average value was taken. The housekeeping genes 18S rRNA in L. chinense and ubiquitin10 (UBQ10) in Arabidopsis were used as a reference for expression levels. The expression level of 18S rRNA in stamens was used as a reference for expression normalization to one. Sequence-specific primers, which were designed using Oligo 7, are listed in Supplementary Table S3. The primers for salt-related gene detection are also shown in Supplementary Table S3.

2.1.5. Sequence Analysis of LcMKK2, LcMKK4, and LcMKK6

Identification of LcMKK genes was based on known gene sequences from A. thaliana (https://www.arabidopsis.com). Orthologs of LcMKK2, LcMKK4, and LcMKK6 from other species were searched using National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) blastp (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). The conservative domain of NtCIPK9 was predicted using InterProScan online software (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/InterProScan/). The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method [31], with a bootstrap value of 1000 replicates [32]. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% of bootstrap replicates were collapsed. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test is shown next to the branches. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There was a total of 547 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X [33]. The accession numbers of identified LcMKK sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S4.

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Sequence Analysis of LcMKK2, LcMKK4, and LcMKK6

Given the importance of genes in the MAPKK family under abiotic stresses, we wondered whether the function of these genes acts usefully in commercial timber tree species L. chinense. Thus, we isolated the MAPKKs from the leaves of L. chinense based on the MAPKK homologs of Arabidopsis from the NCBI database. Three LcMKK family genes were identified from L. chinense. Sequence analysis showed that LcMKK2, LcMKK4, and LcMKK6 contain a complete open reading frame of 1110, 1049, and 1065 bp, respectively, and encode a protein of 369, 347, and 354 amino acids, respectively. According to the BLAST tool analysis in NCBI, the LcMKK2, LcMKK4, and LcMKK6 proteins share more than 70% sequence identity with other MAPKK family genes, such as those from A. thaliana and P. trichocarpa. Multiple alignment analysis showed that the deduced protein sequence of this clone displayed a high identity with MKK2 orthologs from other species (Figure 1A). Additionally, LcMKK4 and LcMKK6 are highly similar to MKK4 and MKK6 sequences from other species (Supplementary Figure S1).
To determine whether these identified genes belong to the MKK family and to obtain more insights into the evolutionary relationship between members of the different MKK subfamilies, we performed a phylogenetic analysis, in which we compared the isolated LcMKK proteins and their functionally characterized homologues from A. thaliana and P. trichocarpa on a sequence level. The resulting tree showed that the MAPKK family can be divided into four subfamilies (i.e., groups A, B, C, and D). LcMKK2 and LcMKK6 are classified into group A, whereas LcMKK4 is classified into group C (Figure 1B).

3.2. LcMKK2 Responds to Cold and Salinity in L. chinense

The MAPK cascade pathway in plants is widespread in eukaryotes [34]. MAPKK family genes have been cloned in many species, and their signal transduction pathways are widespread in plants. We used real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR to analyze the expression levels of LcMKK2, LcMKK4, and LcMKK6 across different L. chinense tissues. We found that these three genes are expressed in all observed L. chinense tissues, including roots, stems, leaves, buds, flowers, petals, stamens, and pistils (Supplementary Figure S2A,B). However, each of the three MAPKK genes has its own unique expression pattern. LcMKK2 expression is highest in roots and lowest in stems and shows a relatively low expression level in the leaves. Flower organs, except petals, showed the highest expression of LcMKK2. Conversely, LcMKK4 shows its highest expression in the stem and the lowest expression in the leaves. Finally, LcMKK6 has its highest expression level in the root and the lowest in the leaves. Thus, the low expression in leaves is a common feature for these three MAPKK genes in L. chinense. In reproductive organs, these three genes have the highest expression in petals and the lowest expression in stamens.
In order to observe the expression of LcMKK2 in L. chinense under salt and cold stress, we isolated total mRNA from whole plants after a 2-h 100 mM NaCl treatment, as well as after a 48-h cold stress treatment. The qPCR results showed that the expression level of LcMKK2 was upregulated after both salt and cold stress (Figure 2A,B). This result indicates that LcMKK2 responds to both salt and cold stress, after which its expression is significantly upregulated.

3.3. Overexpression of LcMKK2 Causes Salt Resistance in Arabidopsis

To study whether LcMKK2 has a function in response to salt stress, we overexpressed the LcMKK2 gene in Arabidopsis (LcMKK2-OE). LcMKK2-OE plants developed more lateral branches, as well as more leaves on side branches, than wild-type Arabidopsis (Figure 3C).
We treated transgenic and wild-type seeds on medium containing 100 mM NaCl for a duration of 5 days. On ½ MS control medium without salt, LcMKK2-OE and wild-type plants germinated and there was no significant difference in growth. We did observe an apparent lengthening of the root system in transgenic plants, especially in the OE-2 line (Figure 3A). After the salt stress treatment, the growth of all plants was inhibited. Under these high salt conditions, wild-type plants are unable to develop green leaves (Figure 3B). In contrast, within all three LcMKK2-OE lines, a certain percentage of plants developed green leaves (Figure 3D). These results indicate that overexpression of LcMKK2-OE indeed enhances the salt tolerance of Arabidopsis. We speculate that LcMKK2-OE could improve salt tolerance due to the roots of these transgenic plants being longer than those in wild-type plants [35].
To further study the effects of LcMKK2-OE on the root system of A. thaliana plants under salt stress, we performed a root length assay after treating the plants with salt stress. On the medium without salt, no difference was observed between LcMKK2-OE and wild-type plants. However, after 5 days of the salt stress treatment, the root system of the transgenic plant was significantly longer than that of the wild-type plants (Figure 4).
Under very high concentrations, plants may be stressed to such a degree that they do not survive [36]. To study the lethality rate of A. thaliana under a high salt concentration, we treated plants for 7 days using medium containing 200 mM NaCl. Under this condition, wild-type plants germinated normally; however, after 3 days on high salt medium, these plants started showing lethality. As the stress time prolonged, the number of dead plants increased. After 7 days, Arabidopsis displayed a lethality rate of 96% (Figure 5). LcMKK2-OE plants showed a much higher resistance to salt stress and were able to develop green leaves. Their survival rate was relatively high, with a maximum lethality rate of only 70%. Together, these results indicate that the LcMKK2 gene increases salt tolerance when overexpressed, possibly by inducing development of a more extensive root system.

3.4. Enhanced Expression of Salt Stress Genes in LcMKK2-OE

Having found that LcMKK2 overexpression leads to increased salt tolerance in Arabidopsis, we sought to determine the mechanism by which this development occurs. To clarify how LcMKK2-OE increases salt resistance, we tested the expression of salt stress response-related genes after a salt stress treatment. Previous studies have shown that the Arabidopsis MEKK1-MKK2-MAPK4/6 cascade is involved in the regulation of salt stress [37].
qPCR analysis showed that the expressions of the genes related to salt stress were increased in LcMKK2-OE plants after a 2-h salt stress treatment in 300 mM NaCl compared with those of the wild-type plants [38]. Proline is the most important osmoregulation substance in plants under high salt and other stresses. P5CS is a key enzyme in proline biosynthesis, which determines the rate of proline accumulation [39]. The P5CS gene was significantly upregulated in WT plants after salt stress, and it was extremely upregulated in transgenic plants.
The PS5C gene responds to salt-stress in both wild-type and transgenic plants. However, other salt stress response-related genes (ACS6 and ACT3) [25] were also upregulated after the salt treatment, whereas wild-type plants were downregulated after the stress treatment (Figure 6). These results indicate that the LcMKK2 gene can regulate some other genes related to salt stress to help plants resist abiotic stress.

4. Discussion

Soil salinity occurs widely throughout the environment, subsequently eliciting a plant response for survival. Generally, elevated levels of salt are encountered by individual roots, but it is likely that the whole plant will respond to salt stress because of the various signal transductions regulated by gene expression [10]. MKK cascades play an important role in transducing developmental and environmental signals into adaptive responses [20,40]. In previous studies, the MKK2 pathway was found to mediate cold and salt stress signaling in Arabidopsis [25]. In our study, we observed that LcMKK2 overexpression mediates improved growth in Arabidopsis under normal conditions in terms of the root system. Moreover, LcMKK2-overexpressing plants hold a higher resistance to salinity than wild-type plants, as LcMKK2 behaves like other homologous genes in different plants.
Our previous hypothesis is that, under salt stress conditions, overexpressing LcMKK2 transgenic plants may phosphorylate downstream MAPK genes to transduce plant stress signals, causing a cellular response to improve salt tolerance. In previous literature, MPK4 and MPK6 were identified as the strongest interactors with MKK2 in Arabidopsis thaliana. In contrast, LcMKK2 does not depend on MPK4 and MPK6 to function in Arabidopsis in our study. Accordingly, the exact molecular mechanisms employed by LcMKK2 to improve salt resistance and regulate plant root growth are still unknown.
Transgenic analysis showed that overexpression of the P. trichocarpa MAPKK4 (PtMKK4) gene remarkably enhanced drought stress tolerance in transgenic poplar plants. Additionally, some drought marker genes, including PtP5CS, PtSUS3, PtLTP3, and PtDREB8, exhibited higher expression levels in the transgenic lines than in the wide-type plants under drought conditions [41]. OsMKK6, an MKK gene from rice (Oryza sativa), was functionally characterized under plant salt stress conditions by transforming its constitutively active form [42]. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that AtMKK6 plays a role in regulating plant immune responses. Gene transformation in trees remains difficult. Our laboratory has established the L. chinense somatic embryogenesis system, which lays the foundation for future transgenesis. All of this will provide references and research directions for us to continue to study the LcMKK4 and LcMKK6 genes in the future.

5. Conclusions

First, we cloned three MAPKK genes from L. chinense (i.e., LcMKK2, LcMKK4, and LcMKK6). In L. chinense, LcMKK2 responds to cold and salinity. Next, we transfected LcMKK2 genes into Arabidopsis and obtained positive transgenic plants. After a salt stress treatment, we found that the transgenic plants were more salt-resistant compared with the WT plants. Finally, we validated the genes related to salt stress through qPCR experiments and found that the expressions of these genes were all upregulated. Therefore, we conclude that the LcMKK2 gene can enhance salt resistance in A. thaliana.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/11/1160/s1, Table S1: Primers used for isolation of LhMKK2, LhMKK4 and LhMKK6 fragments, Table S2: Primers used for isolation of the complete LhMKK2 gene coding region, Table S3: Primers used for qPCR analysis, Table S4: Arabidopsis MAPK family genes used for phylogenic analysis and their NCBI accession numbers. Figure S1: Multiple alignment of conserved domains of MKK6 and MKK orthologs from Liriodendron chinense (Hemsl.)Sarg. and other species, Supplementary Figure S2. Relative expression levels of LsMKKs genes in different of L. chinense (Hemsl.)Sarg. tissues. (A,B) Quantification of expression of LcMKK4 and LcMKK6 (A) and LcMKK2 (B) genes in different mature L. chinense tissues.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.; funding acquisition, J.S.; methodology, P.W. and F.Z.; supervision, J.S.; validation, X.C.; original draft, X.C.; review and editing, L.L., X.L., and Z.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Nature Science Foundation of China, grant number 32071784, 31770715; the Key Research and Development Plan of Jiangsu Province, grant number BE2017376; and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, Grant number BK20181176; the Qinglan project of Jiangsu province, and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ye Lu at Nanjing Forestry University (NJFU);, for providing us with the materials needed in the experiment. We also thank Yuhao Weng (NJFU) for his assistance in figure format and Jiaji Zhang (NJFU) for helpful discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Park, H.J.; Kim, W.-Y.; Yun, A.D.-J. A New Insight of Salt Stress Signaling in Plant. Mol. Cells 2016, 39, 447–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cramer, G.R.; Jones, R.L. Osmotic stress and abscisic acid reduce cytosolic calcium activities in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 1996, 19, 1291–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pitzschke, A. Modes of MAPK substrate recognition and control. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Batistič, O.; Kudla, J. Analysis of calcium signaling pathways in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2012, 1820, 1283–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hey, S.J.; Byrne, E.; Halford, N.G. The interface between metabolic and stress signalling. Ann. Bot. 2009, 105, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Gates, P. The Environmental Impact of Genetically Engineered Crops. Biotech. Gen. Eng. Rev. 1996, 1, 181–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ligterink, W.; Hirt, H. Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways in plants: Versatile signaling tools. Internat. Rev. Cytol. 2001, 201, 209–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tena, G.; Boudsocq, M.; Sheen, J. Protein kinase signaling networks in plant innate immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wrzaczek, M.; Hirt, H. Plant MAP kinase pathways: How many and what for? Biol. Cell 2001, 93, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Singh, B.; Kukreja, S.; Goutam, U. Milestones achieved in response to drought stress through reverse genetic approaches. F1000 Res. 2018, 7, 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Sturgill, T.W.; Ray, L.B. Muscle proteins related to microtubule associated protein-2 are substrates for an insulin-stimulatable kinase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1986, 134, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sun, H.; Charles, C.H.; Lau, L.F.; Tonks, N.K. MKP-1 (3CH134), an immediate early gene product, is a dual specificity phosphatase that dephosphorylates MAP kinase in vivo. Cell 1993, 75, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ichimura, K.; Shinozaki, K.; Tena, G.; Sheen, J.; Henry, Y.; Champion, A.; Kreis, M.; Zhang, S.; Hirt, H.; Heberle-Bors, E.; et al. Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plants: A new nomenclature. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Singh, R.; Lee, J.-E.; Dangol, S.; Choi, J.; Yoo, R.H.; Moon, J.S.; Shim, J.-K.; Rakwal, R.; Agrawal, G.K.; Jwa, N.-S. Protein interactome analysis of 12 mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase in rice using a yeast two-hybrid system. Proteomics 2014, 14, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nicole, M.-C.; Hamel, L.-P.; Morency, M.-J.; Beaudoin, N.; Ellis, B.E.; Séguin, A. MAP-ping genomic organization and organ-specific expression profiles of poplar MAP kinases and MAP kinase kinases. BMC Genom. 2006, 7, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Ichimura, K.; Mizoguchi, T.; Irie, K.; Morris, P.C.; Giraudat, J.; Matsumoto, K.; Shinozaki, K. Isolation of ATMEKK1 (a MAP Kinase Kinase Kinase)-Interacting Proteins and Analysis of a MAP Kinase Cascade in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998, 253, 532–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Asai, T.; Tena, G.; Plotnikova, J.; Willmann, M.R.; Chiu, W.-L.; Gomez-Gomez, L.; Boller, T.; Ausubel, F.M.; Sheen, J. MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 415, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Qiu, J.-L.; Fiil, B.K.; Petersen, K.; Nielsen, H.B.; Botanga, C.J.; Thorgrimsen, S.; Palma, K.; Suarez-Rodriguez, M.C.; Sandbech-Clausen, S.; Lichota, J.; et al. Arabidopsis MAP kinase 4 regulates gene expression through transcription factor release in the nucleus. EMBO J. 2008, 27, 2214–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Cristina, M.; Petersen, M.; Mundy, J. Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling in Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 621–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, J.; Zhang, S.; He, W.-D.; Shao, X.-H.; Li, C.-Y.; Wei, Y.-R.; Deng, G.-M.; Kuang, R.-B.; Hu, C.-H.; Yi, G.-J.; et al. Comparative Phosphoproteomics Reveals an Important Role of MKK2 in Banana (Musa spp.) Cold Signal Network. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hamel, L.-P.; Nicole, M.-C.; Sritubtim, S.; Morency, M.-J.; Ellis, M.; Ehlting, J.; Beaudoin, N.; Barbazuk, B.; Klessig, D.; Lee, J.; et al. Ancient signals: Comparative genomics of plant MAPK and MAPKK gene families. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hamel, L.-P.; Nicole, M.-C.; Duplessis, S.; Ellis, B.E. Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling in Plant-Interacting Fungi: Distinct Messages from Conserved Messengers. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 1327–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Huck, N.V.; Leissing, F.; Majovsky, P.; Buntru, M.; Aretz, C.; Flecken, M.; Müller, J.P.J.; Vogel, S.; Schillberg, S.; Hoehenwarter, W.; et al. Combined 15N-Labeling and TandemMOAC Quantifies Phosphorylation of MAP Kinase Substrates Downstream of MKK7 in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Furuya, T.; Matsuoka, D.; Nanmori, T. Phosphorylation of Arabidopsis thaliana MEKK1 via Ca2+ signaling as a part of the cold stress response. J. Plant Res. 2013, 126, 833–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Teige, M.; Scheikl, E.; Eulgem, T.; Dóczi, R.; Ichimura, K.; Shinozaki, K.; Dangl, J.L.; Hirt, H. The MKK2 Pathway Mediates Cold and Salt Stress Signaling in Arabidopsis. Mol. Cell 2004, 15, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, M.; Wang, K.; Wang, X.; Yang, P. Morphological and Proteomic Analysis Reveal the Role of Pistil under Pollination in Liriodendron chinense (Hemsl.) Sarg. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e99970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, A.; Dick, C.W.; Yao, X.; Huang, H. Impacts of biogeographic history and marginal population genetics on species range limits: A case study of Liriodendron chinense. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhai, Z.H.; Xi, N.C.; Wang, J. Primer Design with Primer Premier 5.0. Northwest Med. Educ. 2008, 16, 695–698. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rychlik, W. OLIGO 7 Primer Analysis Software. Ther. Antib. 2007, 402, 35–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Felsenstein, J. Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the Bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Liang, Y.-J.; Yang, W.-X. Kinesins in MAPK cascade: How kinesin motors are involved in the MAPK pathway? Gene 2019, 684, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wu, H.; Zheng, R.H.; Hao, Z.; Meng, Y.; Weng, Y.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, L.; Hu, X.; Wang, G.; Shi, J.; et al. Cunninghamia lanceolata PSK Peptide Hormone Genes Promote Primary Root Growth and Adventitious Root Formation. Plants 2019, 8, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Liang, W.; Ma, X.; Wan, P.; Liu, L. Plant salt-tolerance mechanism: A review. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 495, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jonak, C.; Kiegerl, S.; Ligterink, W.; Barker, P.J.; Huskisson, N.S.; Hirt, H. Stress signaling in plants: A mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway is activated by cold and drought. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 11274–11279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Wu, D.; Cui, M.; Hao, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, W.; Xue, A.; Chingin, K.; Luo, L. In Situ Study of Metabolic Response of Arabidopsis thaliana Leaves to Salt Stress by Neutral Desorption-Extractive Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 12945–12952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Eokogbenin, E.; Setter, T.L.; Eferguson, M.; Emutegi, R.; Eceballos, H.; Eolasanmi, B.; Efregene, M. Phenotypic approaches to drought in cassava: Review. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Agrawal, G.K.; Agrawal, S.K.; Rakwal, R.; Iwahashi, H.; Rakwal, R. Novel rice MAP kinases OsMSRMK3 and OsWJUMK1 involved in encountering diverse environmental stresses and developmental regulation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 300, 775–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, L.; Wu, H.; Han, L.; Wang, C.; Sun, Y.; Liu, F. Differential expression profiles of poplar MAP kinase kinases in response to abiotic stresses and plant hormones, and overexpression of PtMKK4 improves the drought tolerance of poplar. Gene 2014, 545, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kumar, K.; Sinha, A.K. Overexpression of constitutively active mitogen activated protein kinase kinase 6 enhances tolerance to salt stress in rice. Rice 2013, 6, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationship of LcMKKs with AtMKKs and PtMKKs. (A) Multiple alignment using the conserved protein domains of MKK2 orthologs from L. chinense and two other plant species. (B) The MAPKK family genes in Arabidopsis and P. trichocarpa are divided into four subfamilies (here, denoted as A, B, C, and D); each subfamily is indicated by a uniquely colored box. At, A. thaliana; Pt, P. trichocarpa.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationship of LcMKKs with AtMKKs and PtMKKs. (A) Multiple alignment using the conserved protein domains of MKK2 orthologs from L. chinense and two other plant species. (B) The MAPKK family genes in Arabidopsis and P. trichocarpa are divided into four subfamilies (here, denoted as A, B, C, and D); each subfamily is indicated by a uniquely colored box. At, A. thaliana; Pt, P. trichocarpa.
Forests 11 01160 g001
Figure 2. Relative expression levels of LcMKK genes in L. chinense. (A) Expression level of LcMKK2 genes in L. chinense whole plants after exposure to salt stress. (B) Expression level of LcMKK2 genes in L. chinense whole plants after exposure to cold stress. * p < 0.05. Data represent means ± SD from three biological replicates.
Figure 2. Relative expression levels of LcMKK genes in L. chinense. (A) Expression level of LcMKK2 genes in L. chinense whole plants after exposure to salt stress. (B) Expression level of LcMKK2 genes in L. chinense whole plants after exposure to cold stress. * p < 0.05. Data represent means ± SD from three biological replicates.
Forests 11 01160 g002
Figure 3. LcMKK2-overexpressing Arabidopsis (LcMKK2-OE) plants are more salt-tolerant than the wild-type (WT) plants. (A) Plants germinating on ½ MS medium for 7 days. (B) Plants germinating on 100 mM NaCl salt medium for 7 days. (C) Quantification of the number of side branches and leaves developed by wild-type and LcMKK2-OE plants under soil conditions. (D) Quantification of the percentage of plants developing green leaves in (B). *** p < 0.001; * p < 0.05. ANOVA test was performed for statistical analysis. Data represent means ± SD from three technical replicates. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 3. LcMKK2-overexpressing Arabidopsis (LcMKK2-OE) plants are more salt-tolerant than the wild-type (WT) plants. (A) Plants germinating on ½ MS medium for 7 days. (B) Plants germinating on 100 mM NaCl salt medium for 7 days. (C) Quantification of the number of side branches and leaves developed by wild-type and LcMKK2-OE plants under soil conditions. (D) Quantification of the percentage of plants developing green leaves in (B). *** p < 0.001; * p < 0.05. ANOVA test was performed for statistical analysis. Data represent means ± SD from three technical replicates. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Forests 11 01160 g003
Figure 4. Under salt stress, LcMKK2-OE plants are healthier and develop longer roots. For the root length assay, seeds were sown in horizontal rows and plates incubated vertically. Top panels: A. thaliana wild-type (A) and three separate LcMKK2-OE lines (BD) seedlings on low salt medium. Bottom panels: A. thaliana wild-type (E) and three separate LcMKK2-OE lines (FH) seedlings on high salt medium. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 4. Under salt stress, LcMKK2-OE plants are healthier and develop longer roots. For the root length assay, seeds were sown in horizontal rows and plates incubated vertically. Top panels: A. thaliana wild-type (A) and three separate LcMKK2-OE lines (BD) seedlings on low salt medium. Bottom panels: A. thaliana wild-type (E) and three separate LcMKK2-OE lines (FH) seedlings on high salt medium. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Forests 11 01160 g004
Figure 5. Lethal salt concentration treatment with genetically modified and WT plants. Quantification of plant lethality during a 7-day 200 mmol/L NaCl salt treatment.
Figure 5. Lethal salt concentration treatment with genetically modified and WT plants. Quantification of plant lethality during a 7-day 200 mmol/L NaCl salt treatment.
Forests 11 01160 g005
Figure 6. LcMKK2 promoted the expression of salt-related genes. (AC) Quantification of P5SC (A), ACS6 (B), and ACT3 (C) expression in wild-type (WT) plants and three separate LcMKK2-OE transgenic lines (OE-1, OE-2, and OE-3) when untreated and treated with 300 mM NaCl on soil for 2 h. Data represent the mean ± SD from three technical replicates. An ANOVA test was used for statistical analysis. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Figure 6. LcMKK2 promoted the expression of salt-related genes. (AC) Quantification of P5SC (A), ACS6 (B), and ACT3 (C) expression in wild-type (WT) plants and three separate LcMKK2-OE transgenic lines (OE-1, OE-2, and OE-3) when untreated and treated with 300 mM NaCl on soil for 2 h. Data represent the mean ± SD from three technical replicates. An ANOVA test was used for statistical analysis. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Forests 11 01160 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, X.; Wang, P.; Zhao, F.; Lu, L.; Long, X.; Hao, Z.; Shi, J.; Chen, J. The Liriodendron chinense MKK2 Gene Enhances Arabidopsis thaliana Salt Resistance. Forests 2020, 11, 1160. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111160

AMA Style

Chen X, Wang P, Zhao F, Lu L, Long X, Hao Z, Shi J, Chen J. The Liriodendron chinense MKK2 Gene Enhances Arabidopsis thaliana Salt Resistance. Forests. 2020; 11(11):1160. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111160

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Xinying, Pengkai Wang, Fangfang Zhao, Lu Lu, Xiaofei Long, Zhaodong Hao, Jisen Shi, and Jinhui Chen. 2020. "The Liriodendron chinense MKK2 Gene Enhances Arabidopsis thaliana Salt Resistance" Forests 11, no. 11: 1160. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111160

APA Style

Chen, X., Wang, P., Zhao, F., Lu, L., Long, X., Hao, Z., Shi, J., & Chen, J. (2020). The Liriodendron chinense MKK2 Gene Enhances Arabidopsis thaliana Salt Resistance. Forests, 11(11), 1160. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111160

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop