Next Article in Journal
Changes in Water Retention and Carbon Sequestration in the Huangshan UNESCO Global Geopark (China) from 2000 to 2015
Next Article in Special Issue
Family Forest Owner Management Decisions for Participants Enrolled in a Forest Property Taxation Program in Michigan
Previous Article in Journal
Parameter Localization of Greenhouse Gas Value Model and Greenhouse Gas Storage Simulation for Forest Ecosystems in China
Previous Article in Special Issue
The PING Project: Using Ecological Momentary Assessments to Better Understand When and How Woodland Owner Group Members Engage with Their Woodlands
Article

Family Forest Owners’ Perception of Management and Thinning Operations in Young Dense Forests: A Survey from Sweden

Department of Forest Biomaterials and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 90183 Umea, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2020, 11(11), 1151; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111151
Received: 28 September 2020 / Revised: 19 October 2020 / Accepted: 29 October 2020 / Published: 30 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Family Forests)
Family forest owners (FFOs) own 48% of Sweden’s productive forest land and are responsible for 59% of the annual gross felling. They are thus important suppliers of raw materials to the forest industry and the energy sector. Environmental goals on the national and international level promote an increased use of renewable resources in order to replace fossil-based fuels, but since the current supply of forest products is already fully utilized by the industry, there is a need to find new types of biomass assortment. One way to increase the biomass supply is to replace traditional pre-commercial thinning operations, where fallen stems are left in the forest to rot, with whole-tree harvesting of small-diameter trees using novel technologies and methods. This will however require willingness of the FFOs to shift their management practices. The objectives of this study were, therefore, to elucidate FFOs’ perceptions of management and thinning operations in young dense forests, identify if there are differences depending on their demographic backgrounds, and clarify which factors could potentially affect their willingness to implement whole-tree harvesting in young dense forests. Data were collected through a survey administered to a random sample of 842 FFOs, with a response rate of 53.4% (n = 450). The results show that FFOs in general are positive towards implementing whole-tree harvesting in young dense stands, and are often also willing to promote the development of suitable stands. Factors such as forest size, geographical location, distance from home to their forest, degree of self-employment and current need for cleaning were found to significantly affect their attitudes. The study highlights that the development of cost efficient harvesting techniques and working methods is important if the industry wants to increase the FFOs’ willingness to engage in whole-tree harvesting in young dense forest stands and thereby increase the supply of biomass. View Full-Text
Keywords: harvesting; biomass; bioenergy; attitudes; small-scale forestry harvesting; biomass; bioenergy; attitudes; small-scale forestry
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kronholm, T.; Bengtsson, D.; Bergström, D. Family Forest Owners’ Perception of Management and Thinning Operations in Young Dense Forests: A Survey from Sweden. Forests 2020, 11, 1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111151

AMA Style

Kronholm T, Bengtsson D, Bergström D. Family Forest Owners’ Perception of Management and Thinning Operations in Young Dense Forests: A Survey from Sweden. Forests. 2020; 11(11):1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111151

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kronholm, Thomas, David Bengtsson, and Dan Bergström. 2020. "Family Forest Owners’ Perception of Management and Thinning Operations in Young Dense Forests: A Survey from Sweden" Forests 11, no. 11: 1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111151

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop