Next Article in Journal
Soil Organic Carbon Content and Microbial Functional Diversity Were Lower in Monospecific Chinese Hickory Stands than in Natural Chinese Hickory–Broad-Leaved Mixed Forests
Next Article in Special Issue
Combining a Quantum Cascade Laser Spectrometer with an Automated Closed-Chamber System for δ13C Measurements of Forest Soil, Tree Stem and Tree Root CO2 Fluxes
Previous Article in Journal
Projecting the Potential Global Distribution of Carpomya vesuviana (Diptera: Tephritidae), Considering Climate Change and Irrigation Patterns
Previous Article in Special Issue
N Isotope Fractionation in Tree Tissues During N Reabsorption and Remobilization in Fagus crenata Blume
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Variation of Leaf Carbon Isotope in Plants in Different Lithological Habitats in a Karst Area

1
College of Forest, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
2
College of Life Sciences, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
3
Key Laboratory for Mountain Plant Resources Protection of the Education Ministry of China, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2019, 10(4), 356; https://doi.org/10.3390/f10040356
Submission received: 4 March 2019 / Revised: 13 April 2019 / Accepted: 17 April 2019 / Published: 25 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stable Isotopes in Forest Ecosystem Research)

Abstract

:
Drought is the major factor that limits vegetation recovery in rocky desertification areas. The leaf carbon isotope (δ13C) value is related to plant water-use efficiency (WUE) and is of great significance in revealing the WUE characteristics of species in karst areas. Measurements of the δ13C value in plant leaves and the nutrient and water contents of lithologic soils were obtained for six woody species (cypress, Cupressus funebris Endl.; mansur shrub, Coriaria nepalensis Wall.; camphor, Cinnamomum bodinieri Levl.; birch, Betula luminifera H. Winkl.; alder, Alnus cremastogyne Burk. and dyetree, Platycarya longipes Wu.) planted in three different lithologic soil types (dolomite, dolomite sandstone, limestone) in the karst area of Guizhou Province. The results showed that C. funebris in the dolomite sandstone soil had the highest δ13C value (−27.19‰), whereas C. bodinieri in the limestone soil had the lowest δ13C value (−31.50‰). In terms of lithology, the average leaf δ13C values were −28.66‰ (dolomitic sandstone), −28.83‰ (dolomite), and −29.46‰ (limestone). The δ13C values of C. funebris and A. cremastogyne were significantly lower in the limestone soil than in the dolomite and dolomite sandstone soil, indicating that the WUE of some tree species is affected by soil conditions under different lithological development processes. Moreover, the relationship between the δ13C value in the leaves and the comprehensive soil conditions varied among the species, and the δ13C value was negatively correlated with the soil water content in all three soil types. Our study provides basic data on the composition characteristics of the δ13C value of tree species, which is beneficial for the selection of tree species for vegetation restoration and afforestation in karst areas.

1. Introduction

Karst landforms are characterized by high rates of rock exposure, a thin soil layer, and discontinuous soil cover [1]. Due to the uneven spatial-temporal distribution of precipitation, strong seepage and loss in many karst areas, as well as poor water retention capacity, water is the major factor that limits plant growth in karst areas [2]. Therefore, selecting tree species with high water-use efficiency (WUE) is very important for the success of afforestation in these areas. In 2002, Yu et al. [3] determined the transpiration coefficient of tree species in karst areas to characterize their WUE. Other researchers have measured the WUE of plants using the carbon isotope (δ13C) value. These researchers used spring wheat and desert plants to study the relationship between the δ13C value in the leaves and WUE. The results showed that the leaf δ13C value had a good correlation with the long-term WUE of the plants. The higher the δ13C value, the higher the WUE, which validates the reliability of this index [4,5,6,7]. In recent years, much research has been conducted on the relationship between the δ13C value, climate, habitat conditions, and the soil water content. The main trend observed is a higher δ13C value as the availability of resources decreases [8,9,10,11,12]. However, no research has been reported on the δ13C value and the WUE of plant species from different lithologic habitats in karst areas.
Lithology is a key basic condition that determines a plant’s habitat [13]. The composition and proportions of different lithologies are quite different. Limestone mainly consists of CaCO3, whereas dolomite mainly consists of CaMg(CO3)2. During the lithification process of dolomite, the ratio of the MgO to CaO content increases [14], and the formation and decomposition of Si, Al, Fe2+, Fe3+, Kr, Ba, and Ni in rock are largely affected by the environment [15,16]. In the course of thousands of years of weathering, rocks of different mineral compositions and structures are affected by multiple factors, such as regional climate and hydrologic factors; therefore, the resulting soil inevitably exhibits differences in the physicochemical properties, soil thickness and nutrient content, among other factors. All of these factors affect plants over a long period of time and thus result in differences in plant C utilization. Studies have shown that different lithologies result in differences in regional water and soil resources [17] as well as hydrological-drought mechanisms [18]. Different water supply statuses will have different effects on plant photosynthetic physiology, resulting in different δ13C values. The distribution of the karst area is very wide; the global karst area accounts for 15% of the total land area. Karst landscapes in southern China cover an area of 54 × 104 km2, and the area of carbonate rock outcropping in Guizhou is 13 × 104 km2 [19]. Guizhou is the province with the largest karst area in China, and even the world’s hot and subtropical regions [20,21]. Limestone, dolomite and dolomite sandstone account for 42.73%, 17.31% and 6.59%, respectively, of the total carbonate area in Guizhou Province, and they are the largest rock types in the karst area of this province [22].
In this study, six common woody species used for reforestation (cypress, Cupressus funebris Endl.; mansur shrub, Coriaria nepalensis Wall.; camphor, Cinnamomum bodinieri Levl.; birch, Betula luminifera H. Winkl.; alder, Alnus cremastogyne Burk. and dyetree, Platycarya longipes Wu.) planted in three major lithologic soil types (dolomite, dolomite sandstone, limestone) in the karst district of Guizhou Province were selected because they are the dominant species in the plant community. The δ13C values in the leaves of the selected species and the soil water and nutrient contents were measured, which provides a scientific basis for selecting the most suitable tree species for ecological restoration in different lithologic rocky desertification areas.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

Based on the distribution of carbonate rocks in Guizhou Province, three well-developed sites with three major lithologies (dolomite, dolomite sandstone, limestone) were selected while ensuring that the environmental background was basically the same (Table S1). Of the six species, C. bodinieri, C. funebris, and C. nepalensis occur in all three lithologic soils; A. cremastogyne and B. luminifera are distributed in dolomite and limestone soils; P. longipes grows in the dolomite sandstone and limestone lithologic soils. The details of all sample plots and plant species are shown in Table S1.

2.2. Plant Sample Collection

A conventional community survey method was used. Specifically, we chose three samples, each sample area for the tree species was 20 m × 20 m, and each sample area for the shrubs was 10 m × 10 m. In July 2017, fifteen dominant species (Table S1) were collected from three research plots. In the middle and upper part of the crown, outstretched branches were selected and sampled from four directions (east, west, south, north). Twenty fresh mature leaves were collected from each branch. A total of 80 fresh mature leaves were collected and mixed together from each sample woody species. Four sample trees were selected per species, and a total of 60 samples were collected for all 6 species. After the sample collection, the samples were placed in a breathable bag for subsequent drying and grinding prior to the measurements [23].

2.3. Soil Sample Collection

Soil samples were collected from the sample plot following an “S” shape, from the 0–20 cm layer, the rhizosphere layer, and the 20–40 cm layer. Every layer of soil samples was collected from five randomly distributed locations in the sample plot and then mixed well. Fifteen dominant species from three sample plots, each with 3–6 replicates, resulted in 90 samples. Subsequently, the soil samples were air-dried under natural conditions, ground, sieved through 0.5-mm and 0.2-mm sieves, and stored in a wide-mouthed bottle.

2.4. Measurement Methods

The leaf samples were transported to the laboratory, washed with deionized water, dried at 65 °C in an oven, cooled naturally, crushed by a grinder, and sieved using a 20-mesh sieve before being stored in a sealed bag. Subsequently, the leaf samples were sent to the Stable Isotope Mass Spectrometry Laboratory at the Third Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration for measurement (Xiamen, China). Isotope analysis was conducted using a thermal conversion elemental analyser-continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry system (TC/EA-IRMS, Delta V Advantage), and the measuring error was <0.05‰.
The δ13C value was calculated using the international standard form [24]:
δ C 13 = [ ( C 13 C 12 ) s a m p l e ( C 13 C 12 ) s t a n d a r d ] ÷ ( C 13 C 12 ) s t a n d a r d × 1000
Here, (13C/12C)sample represents the carbon isotope ratio of the sample, and (13C/12C)standard represents the standard Pee Dee Belemnite (PDB) standard isotope ratio.
The soil physical and chemical properties were analysed using methods in Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis [25]. The soil total nitrogen was measured using a distillation method, and the alkali-hydrolysable nitrogen was measured with a diffusion method. The total phosphorus and fast phosphorus contents were determined using the Mo-Sb colorimetric method. The total potassium and Olsen-K contents were determined using flame photometry. The soil organic matter was measured using the potassium dichromate-sulphuric acid-external heating method. The soil water content was determined using the aluminium box drying method, and the soil bulk density was determined using the cutting-ring method.

2.5. Integrated Fertility Indices (IFIs)

Nine physicochemical indices that are closely associated with soil characteristics were used to characterize the lithological soil conditions. The comprehensive condition indices of soil were analysed using principal component analysis (PCA) [26,27]. The variance contribution rate of each principal component Yj is regarded as the weight. The calculation formula is as follows:
I F I s = j = 1 2 a j y j
Here, aj represents the variance contribution rate of the j-th principle component, and yj represents the score of the j-th principle component.

2.6. Data Processing

The data were analysed using Excel 2013 and SPSS 19.0 software (IBM Corp., Chicago, United States). The leaf δ13C values among the lithology types and different tree species were analysed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The relationship between the leaf δ13C values and comprehensive soil conditions and soil water content was analysed by correlation analysis (CA, significance level: α = 0.05). The soil physical and chemical values are based on the average values in different soil profile levels in the sample plots.

3. Results

3.1. Δ13C Values of the Dominant Species in the Three Lithological Soil Types

The δ13C values of dominant species in the three lithological soils were determined (Table 1). The results showed that C. funebris planted in the dolomite sandstone soil had the maximum δ13C value (−27.19‰), whereas C. bodinieri had the minimum δ13C value (−31.50‰) in the limestone soil. The plant δ13C values across the three lithological soil types were −28.66‰ (dolomite sandstone), −28.83‰ (dolomite), and −29.46‰ (limestone). Moreover, the δ13C value of C. funebris in the limestone soil was significantly different from that in the other lithological soil types (p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the δ13C value of A. cremastogyne in limestone and dolomite soil (p = 0.024). Except for C. funebris and A. cremastogyne, the four other species did not exhibit significant differences in the δ13C values among the different lithological soil types.

3.2. Δ13C Values of Different Dominant Species

A comparison of the δ13C values of different dominant plants indicated that P. longipes, A. cremastogyne and B. luminifera (−29.13‰, −29.30‰ and −29.57‰) show significantly lower mean δ13C value than C. nepalensis and C. funebris (−27.68‰ and −28.05‰, p < 0.001), and significantly higher mean δ13C value than C. bodinieri (−30.98‰, p < 0.001) across the three lithologies (Table 1). In the dolomite soil, there was an extremely significant difference in the δ13C value between C. bodinieri, C. funebris, and C. nepalensis as well as between these three species and the other species (p ≤ 0.001), whereas the difference in the δ13C value between C. funebris and C. nepalensis was not significant (p = 0.115). In the dolomite sandstone soil, there was an extremely significant difference in the δ13C value between C. bodinieri and the other species (p < 0.001); there was no significant difference in the δ13C value between C. funebris and C. nepalensis (p = 0.589), whereas there was a significant difference in the δ13C value between these two species and the other species (p = 0.040 or p = 0.014). In the limestone soil, there was an extremely significant difference in the δ13C value between C. bodinieri and C. nepalensis and the other species (p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in the δ13C value between B. luminifera, A. cremastogyne, and P. longipes (p = 0.780, p = 0.450 and p = 0.631). Furthermore, the mean δ13C values of C. nepalensis, C. funebris and C. bodinieri (the three species occurring in all three lithological soil types) in limestone soil (−29.55‰) were lower than in dolomite and dolomite sandstone soil types (−28.57‰ and −28.59‰, p = 0.168 and p = 0.180).

3.3. Relationship between the Δ13C Value of Dominant Species and Comprehensive Lithological Soil Conditions

To investigate the relationship between the δ13C value in the plant leaves and the conditions of the different lithological soils, nine physicochemical indices that are closely associated with soil characteristics were used to characterize the lithological soil conditions (Table 2). The average value of each index in the table is standardized and processed. PCA was performed to evaluate the comprehensive soil conditions. The results indicated that the principal components y1 and y2 accounted for 74.092% and 25.908%, respectively, of the total variation. The linear equation and scoring matrix of the two principal components are as follows, and the details are shown in Table 2:
y 1 = 0.497 x 1 + 0.663 x 2 + 0.977 x 3 + 0.960 x 4 + + 0.897 x 9
y 2 = 0.868 x 1 0.748 x 2 + 0.215 x 3 + 0.281 x 4 + + 0.442 x 9
According to the formula of IFIs, the ranking based on the fertility of the three lithological soil types was limestone (4.954), dolomite (0.047), and dolomite sandstone (−5.001), indicating that limestone contained the most nutrients, followed by dolomite and dolomite sandstone (Table 3). The relationship between the δ13C values of C. funebris, C. bodinieri, and C. nepalensis and the comprehensive value (IFIs) of the soil condition was then analysed (Figure 1). The results suggested that the δ13C values of the three species were negatively correlated with the comprehensive soil condition. The δ13C value of C. funebris had a significant negative correlation with the comprehensive soil condition (R2 = 0.852, p < 0.001), inferring that a lower δ13C value is related to a better comprehensive soil condition. The δ13C values of C. bodinieri and C. nepalensis were negatively correlated with the comprehensive soil condition and the soil water content to various degrees. However, the correlation coefficient was 0.426 (p = 0.0018) and 0.624 (p = 0.0022) for C. bodinieri and C. nepalensis, respectively, implying that the negative correlation between the δ13C values of these two species and the comprehensive soil condition was lower than C. funebris.

3.4. Relationship between the Δ13C Value of the Dominant Species and the Soil Water Content

The δ13C value in leaves is closely related to the plant WUE. Therefore, we speculated that there was a correlation between the δ13C value and the soil water content. By analysing the relationship between these variables (Figure 2), we found that the δ13C values of the dominant species were negatively correlated with the soil water content, i.e., the higher the soil water content, the lower the δ13C value. For the dolomite soil type (R2 = 0.8293, p = 0.0002), the negative correlation between the soil water content and the leaf δ13C values was higher than limestone (R2 = 0.403, p = 0.0013) and dolomite sandstone (R2 = 0.393, p = 0.0012) soil types.

4. Discussion

According to the 2013–2017 meteorological data released by the Guizhou Provincial Meteorological Administration (Table S2), the dolomite sandstone soil showed the highest mean temperature, followed by dolomite and limestone soils. Consistent with the changes in temperature, our results showed that C. funebris in the dolomite sandstone soil had the highest δ13C value (−27.19‰), whereas C. bodinieri had the smallest δ13C value (−31.50‰) in the limestone soil. This is similar to the δ13C range of plants in the Guizhou karst mountain area (−26.98‰~−29.15‰) [19] and that of woody plant species in karst desertification areas (−25.55‰~−30.28‰) [28], far above the maximum values (−27.60‰~−38.65‰) of rainforests plants in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan [29], and far below the minimum values (−23‰~−29‰) of desert plants [30] and deciduous broad-leaved trees (−22.23‰~−31.38‰) [31,32]. These studies suggest that variations (from small to large) in the δ13C values of plants in different climatic zones are correlated with hydro-thermal gradient changes (from south to north). Carbon isotopic ratios on plant tissues depend on atmospheric CO2 composition, stomatal conductance and photosynthetic ratio among other parameters [33]. Thus, temperature and water are key factors that influence the δ13C value of species. In this study, the δ13C value of C. funebris in the limestone soil was significantly different from that in other lithological soil types (p < 0.001), and the δ13C value of A. cremastogyne differed significantly between the limestone soil and dolomite soil (p = 0.024). We speculated the reason for this result is that dolomite and dolomite sandstone soils have more similar climate characteristics than limestone soil (temperature: Table S2; precipitation: Table S1). Moreover, carbon isotopic ratio mainly depends on WUE, and thus different soils resource conditions will affect isotopic composition in term of water availability to plants [34]. Dolomite and dolomite sandstone soils have different structures but share a similar chemical composition. Therefore, the two lithologically developed soils have the same effect on the δ13C values of plants. This may have resulted in the lack of a significant difference in the δ13C value of C. funebris between the dolomite and dolomitic sandstone.
The δ13C value of plants is a result of plant and environmental conditions [32,35]. Plants of the same species or functional group may have different δ13C values under different environmental conditions. Our research showed that the δ13C value had a good correlation with the soil comprehensive index (IFI) for six plant species, but some of the correlations were not strong, indicating that the δ13C values of different plant species in the karst area were inconsistent with respect to different comprehensive soil conditions. Previous studies have shown that plants normally have lower δ13C values when sufficient resources are available in the environment [5,36]. Furthermore, other studies have noted a negative correlation between δ13C values in leaves and the soil water content for some tree species, and plants growing in drought habitats have higher leaf δ13C values [32,37]. Here, we found the mean δ13C values of C. funebris, C. bodinieri, and C. nepalensis in limestone soil were lowest, followed by dolomite and dolomite sandstone soil types. This result was consisted with the comprehensive limestone soil condition better than the other soil lithologies. However, for some lithological soil types, expect for the dolomite soil, the soil water content was not significantly correlated with the leaf δ13C values. It is possible that the main fractionation processes occurring at leaf level play an important role in the carbon isotopic ratios. When a tree is subjected to water stress, the stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rates of the plant leaves are affected, and there are different fractionation effects on the isotopes [33]. Therefore, the leaf δ13C value had a strong negative correlation with the soil water content. The mean annual precipitation at the dolomite sandstone (1240.4 mm) and limestone (1430.9 mm) soils was higher than the dolomite soil (1100 mm, Table S1), resulting in their leaf δ13C values not being significantly correlated with the soil water content.
Common tree species growing at different soil depths (or under different nutrient conditions) in rocky desertification areas normally exhibit two types of responses with regard to the δ13C value. First, the δ13C value has been shown to change non-significantly for species such as Acer buergerianum and Mallotus repandus; second, the δ13C value decreases with increasing soil depth for species such as Mallotus philippinensis and Pistacia weinmannifolia; the latter response is the dominant mode [38]. In deep soils with poor nutrient conditions, the δ13C values of plants in karst mountainous areas have shown both positive and negative responses [19]. Research on the correlation between the δ13C value of Quercus fabri and soil nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium levels in karst areas [23] has shown that the δ13C value was positively correlated with the levels of alkali-hydrolysable nitrogen and available potassium, negatively correlated with the Olsen p value, and highly negatively correlated with the comprehensive soil condition (R2 = 0.9779). We suspected that the possible reason for these research differences is the association between δ13C value and soil properties is indirect, and climate characteristics need to be considered. Our previous results suggested that the δ13C values of three plant species show varying degrees of negative correlation with the comprehensive soil conditions and soil water contents, but they are also related to temperature and precipitation. Moreover, other researches demonstrated a tighter link between δ13C value and soil depth than with climate conditions in Pinus sylvestris, because of the amount of water available to roots [38,39]. This inferred that under well-watered and mild temperature conditions, where soil water retention capacity is low, soil properties related to an enhance water retention should be the key factor conditioning carbon isotopic composition on plant tissues.
In summary, the δ13C method could be used to determine the comprehensive soil conditions in karst areas. This method is advanced, simple and worthy of exploration. However, the association between δ13C value and soil properties is indirect, and some problems remain to be addressed. A large number of experimental studies are required on the sampling method, control conditions, specific indicators, and the effects of the climate. In addition, some tree species exhibit more sensitivity regarding the δ13C value, and some have a large ecological range; therefore, the selection of tree species requires careful consideration. Determining whether the δ13C value corresponds to the changes in soil conditions or water stress is the greatest obstacle in characterizing soil and water conditions using δ13C values. Therefore, more theoretical and technical breakthroughs are needed to reveal the comprehensive soil conditions in karst areas using the δ13C value in plant leaves.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/10/4/356/s1, Table S1: Sample plot characteristics of forest stands across three lithological soil types. Table S2: The mean temperature in five years of sample plots across three lithological soil types.

Author Contributions

L.Y. conceived and designed the project. J.Z. conducted the experiments and wrote the manuscript. J.Z. and Z.H. analysed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a project of the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0502604), the Guizhou Province major special project ([2014]2002), and the National Natural Science Foundation (31560187).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
WUEWater-use efficiency
IRMSIsotope ratio mass spectrometry
PDBPee Dee Belemnite standard
PCAPrincipal component analysis
CACorrelation analysis
IFIIntegrated fertility index

References

  1. Zhu, S.Q. Study on Forest Ecology in Karst, 2nd ed.; People’s Publishing House of Guizhou Province: Guizhou, China, 2002; pp. 21–53. [Google Scholar]
  2. He, K.Q.; Du, R.L.; Jiang, W.F. Contrastive analysis of karst collapses and the distribution rules in northern and southern China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2010, 59, 1309–1318. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yu, L.F.; Zhu, S.Q.; Ye, J.Z. Preliminary study on the adaptability of tolerate-drought for different species group in karst forest. J. Nanjing For. Univ. 2002, 26, 18–22. [Google Scholar]
  4. Arslan, A.; Zapata, F.; Kumarasinghe, K.S. Carbon isotope discrimination as indicator of water-use efficiency of spring wheat as affected by salinity and gypsum addition. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1999, 30, 2681–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ehleringer, J.R.; Hall, A.E.; Farquhar, G.D. Carbon and water relations in desert plants: An isotopic perspective. Stable Isot. Carbon-Water Relat. 1993, 72, 155–172. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wildy, D.T.; Pate, J.S.; Sefcik, L.T. Water-use efficiency of a mallee eucalypt growing naturally and in short-rotation coppice cultivation. Plant Soil 2004, 262, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Akhter, J.; Mahmood, K.; Tasneem, M. Comparative water-use efficiency of Sporobolus arabicus and Leptochloa fusca and its relation with carbon-isotope discrimination under semi-arid conditions. Plant Soil 2003, 249, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jędrysek, M.O.; Krąpiec, M.; Skrzypek, G.; Kałużny, A. Air-pollution effect and paleotemperature scale versus δ13C records in tree rings and in a peat core (Southern Poland). Water Air Soil Pollut. 2003, 145, 359–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Máguas, C.; Griffiths, S.H. Applications of Stable Isotopes in Plant Ecology; Progress in Botany; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2003; Volume 64, pp. 472–505. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hatté, C.; Schwartz, D. Reconstruction of paleoclimates by isotopic analysis: What can the fossil isotopic record tell us about the plant life of past environments? Phytochem. Rev. 2003, 2, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Renard, D.; Birk, J.J.; Glaser, B. Origin of mound-field landscapes: A multi-proxy approach combining contemporary vegetation, carbon stable isotopes and phytoliths. Plant Soil 2012, 351, 337–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wei, J.; Liu, W.G.; Cheng, J.M.; Li, W.J. δ13C values of plants as indicators of soil water content in modern ecosystems of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Ecol. Eng. 2015, 77, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, Y.F.; Wang, K.L.; Qi, X.K. Difference in spatial-temporal change of karst vegetation in dolomite and limestone based on TM image. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2016, 36, 180–189. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, L.C.; Hu, W.X.; Wang, X.L. Variation of Sr content and ~(87) Sr/~(86) Sr isotope fractionation during dolomitization and their implications. Oil Gas Geol. 2016, 37, 464–471. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhou, D.Q.; Wang, S.J.; Liu, X.M. Study on geo-chemical process in limest stone soil profile. Earth Environ. 2005, 33, 31–38. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gao, F.H.; Zhang, Y.S.; Pu, X.G. Type of dolomization and formation mechanism: A case study of Palaeogene Es1 in Qikou Sag. J. Jilin Univ. 2017, 47, 355–369. [Google Scholar]
  17. Li, Y.B.; Wang, S.J.; Li, R.L. Karst ecosystem soil. J. Ecol. Environ. 2004, 13, 434–438. [Google Scholar]
  18. He, Z.H.; Chen, X.X.; Liang, H. Study on drought mechanism of typical karst basin with lithologic composite structure-A case study of Guizhou province. Chin. J. Geol. 2015, 50, 340–353. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang, C.; Liu, C.Q.; Song, Z.L. Carbon isotope composition of plant leaf in Guizhou karst mountain area. Earth Environ. 2007, 35, 33–38. [Google Scholar]
  20. Xiong, K.L.; Li, P.; Zhong, Z.F. Remote Sensing of Rocky Desertification in Karst-GIS Typical Study-Take Guizhou as an Example; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2002; pp. 1–183. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhu, S.Q. Preliminary study on forest niche characteristics in Karst. In Study on Forest Ecology in Karst, 1st ed.; Science and Technology Press: Guiyang, China, 1993; pp. 52–62. [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, R.L.; Wang, S.J.; Zhou, D.Q.; Zhang, D.F. Correlation analysis between lithology and rocky desertification in Guizhou karst area. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2003, 58, 315–320. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fu, Y.H.; Huang, Z.S.; Yu, L.F. Changes of foliar δ13C value of Quercus fabric in different root underground habitat types in Karst area. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2012, 23, 2961–2967. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lin, G.H. Stable Isotope Ecology, 1st ed.; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2013; pp. 7–8. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bao, S.D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 1999; pp. 229–291. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pang, X.Y. Comparative Study of Soil Characteristics during Different Successional Stages for Subalpine Coniferous Forest in Western Sichuan. Master’s Thesis, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, China, 2002; pp. 31–37. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wei, Y.; Yu, L.F.; Zhang, J.C. Evaluation on soil ecologic fertility quantity during vegetation succession of degraded karst—A case study in Huajiang valley, Guizhou. Carsologica Sin. 2009, 28, 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rong, L.; Wang, S.J.; Du, X.L. Responses of foliar δ13C values of woody plants to different karst rocky desertification degrees in Huajiang gorge, Guizhou. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2007, 43, 38–44. [Google Scholar]
  29. Qu, C.M.; Han, X.G.; Su, P. Characteristics of leaf δ13C value of fragmented rainforest plant in Xishuangbanna of Yunnan and the water use efficiency. Chin. Bull. Bot. 2001, 43, 186–192. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chen, T.; Ma, J.; Feng, H.Y. Analysis of environment for stable carbon isotope value of typical desert C3 plants in Fukang area. Arid Land Geogr. 2002, 25, 342–345. [Google Scholar]
  31. Buchmann, N.; Kao, W.Y.; Ehleringer, J.R. Influence of stand structure on carbon-13 of vegetation, solids, and canopy air within deciduous and evergreen forests in Utah, United States. Oecologia 1997, 110, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yan, C.R.; Han, X.G.; Chen, L.Z. Foliar δ13C within temperate deciduous Forest: Its spatial change and interspecies variation. Acta Bot. Sin. 1998, 40, 853–859. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gessler, A.; Ferrio, J.P.; Hommel, R. Stable isotopes in tree rings: Towards a mechanistic understanding of isotope fractionation and mixing processes from the leaves to the wood. Tree Physiol. 2014, 34, 796–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pate, J.S. Carbon isotope discrimination and plant water-use efficiency. In Stable Isotope Techniques in the Study of Biological Processes and Functioning of Ecosystems. Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture; Unkovich, M., Pate, J., McNeill, A., Gibbs, D.J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001; Volume 40, pp. 19–36. [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu, X.Z.; Gao, C.C.; Su, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Song, Y. Altitudinal trends in δ13C value, stomatal density and nitrogen content of Pinus tabuliformis needles on the southern slope of the middle Qinling Mountains, China. J. Mt. Sci. 2016, 13, 1066–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schuster, W.S.F.; Sandquist, D.R.; Philips, S.L. Comparisons of carbon isotope discrimination in populations of arid land plant species differing in lifespan. Oecologia 1992, 91, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rong, L.; Wang, S.J.; Du, X.L. Research of relation between δ13C value of common plants and environmental factors in Karst. Environ. Sci. 2008, 29, 2885–2893. [Google Scholar]
  38. Song, L.; Zhu, J.; Li, M. Intrinsic water use efficiency in wet and dry years at young and old plantations of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica in semiarid China. J. For. Res. 2015, 20, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Santini, F.; Ferrio, J.P.; Hereş, A.M. Scarce population genetic differentiation but substantial spatiotemporal phenotypic variation of water-use efficiency in Pinus sylvestris at its western distribution range. Eur. J. For. Res. 2018, 137, 863–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Relationship between the δ13C value in the plant leaves and the comprehensive lithological soil condition. (a) Cupressus funebris, (b) Cinnamomum bodinieri, (c) Coriaria nepalensis.
Figure 1. Relationship between the δ13C value in the plant leaves and the comprehensive lithological soil condition. (a) Cupressus funebris, (b) Cinnamomum bodinieri, (c) Coriaria nepalensis.
Forests 10 00356 g001
Figure 2. Relationship between the δ13C value of the dominant species and the soil water content in different lithological soil types. (a) dolomite, (b) dolomite sandstone, (c) limestone.
Figure 2. Relationship between the δ13C value of the dominant species and the soil water content in different lithological soil types. (a) dolomite, (b) dolomite sandstone, (c) limestone.
Forests 10 00356 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of the δ13C values of the dominant species in three lithological soil types.
Table 1. Characteristics of the δ13C values of the dominant species in three lithological soil types.
LithologyDominant SpeciesMinimum Value (‰)Maximum Value (‰)Mean (‰) ± Standard DeviationSignificant Difference Across sites
DolomiteCinnamomum bodinieri−30.70−29.97−30.37 ± 0.36 a--
Cupressus funebris−27.60−27.26−27.45 ± 0.15 d1
Coriaria nepalensis−28.10−27.70−27.88 ± 0.17 d--
Betula luminifera−29.94−28.96−29.55 ± 0.47 b--
Alnus cremastogyne−29.40−28.39−28.91 ± 0.41 c1
Dolomite sandstoneCinnamomum bodinieri−32.49−30.10−31.08 ± 1.23 a--
Cupressus funebris−27.88−26.20−27.19 ± 0.76 c1
Coriaria nepalensis−28.14−26.90−27.51 ± 0.60 c--
Platycarya longipes−29.62−28.30−28.87 ± 0.57 b--
LimestoneCinnamomum bodinieri−32.00−30.44−31.50 ± 0.72 a--
Cupressus funebris−29.80−29.32−29.51 ± 0.21 b2
Coriaria nepalensis−28.60−26.99−27.65 ± 0.77 c--
Betula luminifera−29.80−29.25−29.58 ± 0.27 b--
Alnus cremastogyne−30.00−29.26−29.69 ± 0.31 b2
Platycarya longipes−29.90−28.20−29.38 ± 0.80 b--
The letters represent significant differences in the δ13C values of different species within each site. The numbers represent significant differences in the δ13C values across sites for each specie.
Table 2. Characteristics of the three lithological soil types.
Table 2. Characteristics of the three lithological soil types.
Soil Bulk Density (x1, g/cm3)Soil Water Content (x2, %)Organic Matter (x3, g/kg)Total Nitrogen (x4, g/kg)Total Phosphorus (x5, g/kg)Total Potassium (x6, g/kg)Alkali-Hydrolysable Nitrogen (x7, g/kg)Available Phosphorus (x8, mg/kg)Olsen-K (x9, mg/kg)
Dolomite x ¯ 0.99829.61055.6712.8890.46717.797183.2552.08781.923
x −1.0680.956−0.100−0.178−0.5100.809−0.0230.237−0.372
Dolomite sandstone x ¯ 1.07823.28047.9912.4530.4247.120143.9031.63976.700
x 0.914−1.039−0.946−0.899−0.642−1.118−0.988−1.097−0.761
Limestone x ¯ 1.04726.84066.0883.6501.01815.028225.4502.296102.105
x 0.1540.0831.0461.0771.1520.3091.0110.8601.133
x ¯ : mean value; x : The standardized value; x i j = x i j x j ¯ S j S j = 1 n 1 i = 1 n ( x i j x j ¯ ) 2 .
Table 3. Scores and ranks of the principal components of the soil indices.
Table 3. Scores and ranks of the principal components of the soil indices.
P1P2Overall Evaluation
Lithology Typey1Ranky2RankIFIsRank
Dolomite0.9972−2.66930.0472
Dolomite sandstone−7.11131.0332−5.0013
Limestone6.11411.63614.9541

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zou, J.; Yu, L.; Huang, Z. Variation of Leaf Carbon Isotope in Plants in Different Lithological Habitats in a Karst Area. Forests 2019, 10, 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10040356

AMA Style

Zou J, Yu L, Huang Z. Variation of Leaf Carbon Isotope in Plants in Different Lithological Habitats in a Karst Area. Forests. 2019; 10(4):356. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10040356

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zou, Jun, Lifei Yu, and Zongsheng Huang. 2019. "Variation of Leaf Carbon Isotope in Plants in Different Lithological Habitats in a Karst Area" Forests 10, no. 4: 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10040356

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop