Next Article in Journal
Tree Water Use, Water Use Efficiency, and Carbon Isotope Discrimination in Relation to Growth Potential in Populus deltoides and Hybrids under Field Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Species Differences in Nitrogen Acquisition in Humid Subtropical Forest Inferred From 15N Natural Abundance and Its Response to Tracer Addition
Open AccessArticle

Calibration and Assessment of Burned Area Simulation Capability of the LPJ-WHyMe Model in Northeast China

by Dandan Yue 1,2, Junhui Zhang 1, Guodong Sun 2,3 and Shijie Han 1,4,*
1
CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
LASG, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
4
School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2019, 10(11), 992; https://doi.org/10.3390/f10110992
Received: 6 October 2019 / Revised: 5 November 2019 / Accepted: 5 November 2019 / Published: 6 November 2019
Fire isone of the major forest disturbances in northeast China.In this study, simulations of the burned area in northeast Chinafrom 1997 to 2015 were conducted with the Lund–Potsdam–Jena wetland hydrology and methane (LPJ-WHyMe) model. The fire modeling ability in northeast China was assessed by calibrating parameters in the model. The parameters in the model were calibrated against the satellite-based global fire product (Global Fire Emission Database, version 4.1 (GFEDv4)) for the simulated burned area over the calibration period (1997–2010). Compared to the results with the uncalibrated parameters, the results obtained with the calibrated parameters in the LPJ-WHyMe model better described the spatial and interannual variability of the burned area. The spatial correlation coefficient between the GFEDv4 and the simulations increased from −0.14 for the uncalibrated version to 0.46 for the calibrated version over the calibration period. The burned area simulation ability was also improvedover the validation period (2011–2015), and the spatial correlation coefficient between the GFEDv4 and the simulations increased from 0.20 for the uncalibrated version to 0.60 for the calibrated version. The mean absolute error (MAE) between the GFEDv4 and the simulations decreased from 0.018 for the uncalibrated version to 0.011 for the calibrated version (a decrease of 39%) over the calibration period and decreased from 0.020 to 0.016 (a decrease of 20%) over the validation period. Further numerical results showed that the improved simulation abilitiesof soil moisture and total aboveground litterhad an important contribution to improving the burned area simulation ability.Sensitivity analysis suggested that determining the uncertainty ranges for parameters in northeast China was important to further improving the burned area simulation ability in northeast China. View Full-Text
Keywords: fire; parameter optimization; LPJ-WHyMe; simulation uncertainty fire; parameter optimization; LPJ-WHyMe; simulation uncertainty
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Yue, D.; Zhang, J.; Sun, G.; Han, S. Calibration and Assessment of Burned Area Simulation Capability of the LPJ-WHyMe Model in Northeast China. Forests 2019, 10, 992.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop