Next Article in Journal
Changes in Functional Response of Soil Microbial Community along Chronosequence of Spontaneous Succession on Post Mining Forest Sites Evaluated by Biolog and SIR Methods
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Variable Selection and Forest Type on Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Machine Learning Algorithms
Previous Article in Journal
Diversity of Understory Communities in Boreal Forests: Influences of Forest Type, Latitude, and Spatial Scale
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nondestructive Estimation of the Above-Ground Biomass of Multiple Tree Species in Boreal Forests of China Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning
Open AccessArticle

Estimating Forest Aboveground Carbon Storage in Hang-Jia-Hu Using Landsat TM/OLI Data and Random Forest Model

by Meng Zhang 1,2,3, Huaqiang Du 1,2,3,*, Guomo Zhou 1,2,3, Xuejian Li 1,2,3, Fangjie Mao 1,2,3, Luofan Dong 1,2,3, Junlong Zheng 1,2,3, Hua Liu 1,2,3, Zihao Huang 1,2,3 and Shaobai He 1,2,3
State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
Key Laboratory of Carbon Cycling in Forest Ecosystems and Carbon Sequestration of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
School of Environmental and Resources Science, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2019, 10(11), 1004;
Received: 27 September 2019 / Revised: 5 November 2019 / Accepted: 7 November 2019 / Published: 9 November 2019
Dynamic monitoring of carbon storage in forests resources is important for tracking ecosystem functionalities and climate change impacts. In this study, we used multi-year Landsat data combined with a Random Forest (RF) algorithm to estimate the forest aboveground carbon (AGC) in a forest area in China (Hang-Jia-Hu) and analyzed its spatiotemporal changes during the past two decades. Maximum likelihood classification was applied to make land-use maps. Remote sensing variables, such as the spectral band, vegetation indices, and derived texture features, were extracted from 20 Landsat TM and OLI images over five different years (2000, 2004, 2010, 2015, and 2018). These variables were subsequently selected according to their importance and subsequently used in the RF algorithm to build an estimation model of forest AGC. The results showed the following: (1) Verification of classification results showed maximum likelihood can extract land information effectively. Our land cover classification yielded overall accuracies between 86.86% and 89.47%. (2) Additionally, our RF models showed good performance in predicting forest AGC, with R2 from 0.65 to 0.73 in the training and testing phase and a RMSE range between 3.18 and 6.66 Mg/ha. RMSEr in the testing phase ranged from 20.27 to 22.27 with a low model error. (3) The estimation results indicated that forest AGC in the past two decades increased with density at 10.14 Mg/ha, 21.63 Mg/ha, 26.39 Mg/ha, 29.25 Mg/ha, and 44.59 Mg/ha in 2000, 2004, 2010, 2015, and 2018. The total forest AGC storage had a growth rate of 285%. (4) Our study showed that, although forest area decreased in the study area during the time period under study, the total forest AGC increased due to an increment in forest AGC density. However, such an effect is overridden in the vicinity of cities by intense urbanization and the loss of forest covers. Our study demonstrated that the combined use of remote sensing data and machine learning techniques can improve our ability to track the forest changes in support of regional natural resource management practices. View Full-Text
Keywords: Landsat dataset; forest AGC estimation; random forest; spatiotemporal evolution Landsat dataset; forest AGC estimation; random forest; spatiotemporal evolution
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, M.; Du, H.; Zhou, G.; Li, X.; Mao, F.; Dong, L.; Zheng, J.; Liu, H.; Huang, Z.; He, S. Estimating Forest Aboveground Carbon Storage in Hang-Jia-Hu Using Landsat TM/OLI Data and Random Forest Model. Forests 2019, 10, 1004.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop