Next Article in Journal
Prioritizing Longitudinal Gene–Environment Interactions Using an FDR-Assisted Robust Bayesian Linear Mixed Model
Previous Article in Journal
Key Aspects to Promote the Safe Use of GenAI Tools by Undergraduate Education and Architecture Students: Similarities and Differences
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Innovative Approach Regarding Efficient and Expedited Early Building Renovation Cost Estimation Utilizing ANNs and the TOPSIS Methodology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development and Application of a Fuzzy-Apriori-Based Algorithmic Model for the Pedagogical Evaluation of Student Background Data and Question Generation

1
Doctoral School of Multidisciplinary Engineering Sciences (MMTDI), Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Hungary
2
Kandó Kálmán Faculty of Electrical Engineering (KVK TMPK), Óbuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary
3
Apáczai Csere János Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Hungary
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Algorithms 2025, 18(11), 727; https://doi.org/10.3390/a18110727
Submission received: 8 September 2025 / Revised: 12 November 2025 / Accepted: 15 November 2025 / Published: 19 November 2025

Abstract

This study presents a fuzzy-Apriori model that analyses student background data, along with end-of-lesson student-generated questions, to identify interpretable rules. After linguistic and semantic preprocessing, questions are represented in a fuzzy form and combined with background and performance variables to generate association rules, including support, confidence, and lift. The dataset includes 202 students, parent reports from 174 families, 5832 student-generated questions, and 510 teacher-generated questions collected in regular lessons in grades 7–8. The model also incorporates a topic-level dynamic updating step that refreshes the rule set over time. The findings indicate descriptive associations between background characteristics, question complexity and alignment, and classroom performance. It is essential to note that this phase explores possibilities rather than providing a validated instructional method. Question coding inevitably involves subjective elements, and while we conducted the study in real classroom settings, we did not perform causal analyses at this stage. The next step will be developing reliability metrics through longitudinal studies across multiple classroom environments. Future work will test whether using these patterns can inform instructional adjustments and support student learning.
Keywords: educational data mining; learning analytics; question generation; personalised assessment; interpretable rules; adaptive learning; student modelling; pedagogical decision support educational data mining; learning analytics; question generation; personalised assessment; interpretable rules; adaptive learning; student modelling; pedagogical decision support

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karl, É.; Molnár, G. Development and Application of a Fuzzy-Apriori-Based Algorithmic Model for the Pedagogical Evaluation of Student Background Data and Question Generation. Algorithms 2025, 18, 727. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18110727

AMA Style

Karl É, Molnár G. Development and Application of a Fuzzy-Apriori-Based Algorithmic Model for the Pedagogical Evaluation of Student Background Data and Question Generation. Algorithms. 2025; 18(11):727. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18110727

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karl, Éva, and György Molnár. 2025. "Development and Application of a Fuzzy-Apriori-Based Algorithmic Model for the Pedagogical Evaluation of Student Background Data and Question Generation" Algorithms 18, no. 11: 727. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18110727

APA Style

Karl, É., & Molnár, G. (2025). Development and Application of a Fuzzy-Apriori-Based Algorithmic Model for the Pedagogical Evaluation of Student Background Data and Question Generation. Algorithms, 18(11), 727. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18110727

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop