Next Article in Journal
Boundary SPH for Robust Particle–Mesh Interaction in Three Dimensions
Previous Article in Journal
An Interface to Monitor Process Variability Using the Binomial ATTRIVAR SS Control Chart
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fault Location Method Based on Dynamic Operation and Maintenance Map and Common Alarm Points Analysis

1
College of Electronic Information and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
2
ICBC Data Center, Shanghai 200131, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Algorithms 2024, 17(5), 217; https://doi.org/10.3390/a17050217
Submission received: 10 April 2024 / Revised: 11 May 2024 / Accepted: 14 May 2024 / Published: 16 May 2024

Abstract

Under a distributed information system, the scale of various operational components such as applications, operating systems, databases, servers, and networks is immense, with intricate access relationships. The silo effect of each professional is prominent, and the linkage mechanism is insufficient, making it difficult to locate the infrastructure components that cause exceptions under a particular application. Current research only plays a role in local scenarios, and its accuracy and generalization are still very limited. This paper proposes a novel fault location method based on dynamic operation maps and alarm common point analysis. During the fault period, various alarm entities are associated with dynamic operation maps, and alarm common points are obtained based on graph search addressing methods, covering deployment relationship common points, connection common points (physical and logical), and access flow common points. This method, compared with knowledge graph approaches, eliminates the complex process of knowledge graph construction, making it more concise and efficient. Furthermore, in contrast to indicator correlation analysis methods, this approach supplements with configuration correlation information, resulting in more precise positioning. Through practical validation, its fault hit rate exceeds 82%, which is significantly better than the existing main methods.
Keywords: fault location; dynamic operation and maintenance map; common alarm points fault location; dynamic operation and maintenance map; common alarm points

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, S.; Guan, J. Fault Location Method Based on Dynamic Operation and Maintenance Map and Common Alarm Points Analysis. Algorithms 2024, 17, 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/a17050217

AMA Style

Wu S, Guan J. Fault Location Method Based on Dynamic Operation and Maintenance Map and Common Alarm Points Analysis. Algorithms. 2024; 17(5):217. https://doi.org/10.3390/a17050217

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Sheng, and Jihong Guan. 2024. "Fault Location Method Based on Dynamic Operation and Maintenance Map and Common Alarm Points Analysis" Algorithms 17, no. 5: 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/a17050217

APA Style

Wu, S., & Guan, J. (2024). Fault Location Method Based on Dynamic Operation and Maintenance Map and Common Alarm Points Analysis. Algorithms, 17(5), 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/a17050217

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop