Next Article in Journal
Immobilization of Lead and Zinc in Tailings Sand Using a Stabilizer Synthesized from Granite Sawdust for Mine Remediation
Previous Article in Journal
Accelerating High-Entropy Alloy Design via Machine Learning: Predicting Yield Strength from Composition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Ti/Cu Dissimilar Metal Butt-Welded by the Cold Welding Process

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2026, 19(1), 197; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19010197
Submission received: 9 December 2025 / Revised: 20 December 2025 / Accepted: 29 December 2025 / Published: 5 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Mechanics of Materials)

Abstract

Titanium alloys and copper have broad applications in aerospace, defense, and industry, but their dissimilar welding faces challenges from significant physicochemical differences and easy formation of brittle Ti-Cu intermetallic compounds, while existing methods like laser welding or friction stir welding have limitations, such as low strength or inability to weld ultra-thin plates. This study adopted cold welding to join Ti-6.5Al-1Mo-1V-2Zr alloy and 99.90% pure copper. The mechanical properties of the joint were tested, the microstructure and fracture of the weld were observed, and the phase composition of the weld was analyzed. The results show that the weld fusion zone mainly consists of Cu-based solid solution and Cu3Ti. Low cold welding heat input reduces the Cu3Ti content, so the joint mechanical properties do not decrease significantly. The tensile strength of the joint reaches 284 MPa, which is 83% of that of copper-based metals, and the elongation rate reaches 6.25%. Diffusion kinetics and solidification thermodynamics analyses confirm that Cu3Ti intermetallic compounds are preferentially generated in the weld seam.

1. Introduction

Titanium and its alloys have the advantages of low density, high specific strength, strong corrosion resistance, and plastic deformation, which are widely used in the fields of defense, automobile manufacturing, and aerospace engineering [1,2,3]. Copper and its alloys have good features of electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, corrosion resistance, and easy processing and forming, which are also widely used in the fields of defense, automobile manufacturing, and industrial production [4,5]. To realize the welding of titanium and copper dissimilar metals, the composite structure can not only make up for the deficiency of titanium thermal conductivity but also remedy the poor mechanical properties of copper and further improve the corrosion resistance of copper [6,7].
The physical and chemical properties of titanium and copper are significantly different. In particular, the differences in melting point, specific heat capacity, thermal conductivity, and linear expansion coefficient will cause high residual stress and large deformation of the weld seam and base material. In addition, titanium and copper elements have limited mutual solubility in the liquid state and low mutual solubility in the solid state, and Ti-Cu intermetallic compounds, such as Cu3Ti, Cu4Ti, and Cu4Ti3, are easily formed between them [8]. The combined effect of residual stress and intermetallic compounds makes the mechanical properties of the welded joint between titanium and copper very poor [9]. Therefore, there are some challenges in achieving high-quality Ti/Cu welding.
At present, Ti/Cu dissimilar material welding methods that have been reported by scientists include electron beam [10,11], laser welding [12,13], friction stir welding [14,15], and other welding methods [16,17,18,19]. The results show that a large number of Ti-Cu intermetallic compounds are generated in the weld seam when the electron or laser beam is placed at the interface of Ti/Cu. When the electron or laser beam is biased on the copper side, the number of intermetallic compounds generated in the interface is significantly reduced. The reduction in the number of Ti-Cu metal compounds can improve the mechanical properties of the Ti/Cu dissimilar material joint, while currently, when using welding methods with high energy density like electron beam welding and laser welding, the joint strengths achieved by adjusting process parameters are 147 MPa and 225 MPa, respectively, which still do not meet the application requirements. When friction welding is used to weld Ti/Cu dissimilar materials, the amount of Ti-Cu intermetallic compounds generated in the weld is reduced. Ti and Cu form a vortex-like biphasic metal mixed structure [3], and the tensile strength of the joint can reach 95% of the copper base metal, but the ultra-thin plate, with a thickness of less than 1 mm, is not easily welded by stirring friction welding.
In this study, cold welding is used to weld the dissimilar material of titanium and copper. Cold welding is a pulsed-arc micro-welding process using short-duration, high-current electrical pulses to deposit an electrode material on a metallic substrate. Due to the extremely low heat input of cold welding technology, it is expected to be applied in the welding of thin metal sheets [20,21]. In the welding of Ti/Cu dissimilar metal sheets, it is hoped that the formation of Ti-Cu intermetallic compounds in the weld can be reduced and the mechanical properties of joints can be improved by using this method. At present, there is no report of using cold welding to weld Ti/Cu dissimilar metals.

2. Materials and Methods

Ti-6.5Al-1Mo-1V-2Zr alloy (The grade is TA15.) and copper (99.90%) were used for welding trials. The thicknesses of the Cu and Ti base metals were 1 mm and 0.5 mm, respectively, and the sizes were 50 mm × 100 mm. Before welding, we sanded the surface of the plate with sandpaper to remove the oxide film and wiped it with acetone to eliminate oil contaminants. In order to achieve a sufficient Cu melting amount during butt welding, the cold welding electrode was biased to the Cu side by 0.3 mm, and the welding schematic is shown in Figure 1a. After welding, the mechanical property test specimen was prepared according to the ASTM: E-8/E8M-2021 standard [22] and tensile experiments, and the shape and size of the specimen are shown in Figure 1b. The tensile speed was 3 mm/min, and the tensile strength of each parameter was taken as the average of 3 specimens. In addition, after the cross-section of the welded joint was cut by wire cutting, different types of sandpaper were prepared according to the standard metallographic sample preparation process. The specimen was then corroded with 15% phosphoric acid + 30% nitric acid + 55% glacial acetic acid for 25 s. The microscopic organization of the joint was observed by SEM, model JSM-6490LV, and the composition and phase detection in the welds used an electron probe micro-analyzer (EPMA), model EPMA-1600, and X-ray diffraction (XRD), model SmartLab SE.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Analysis of Surface Morphology and Microstructure of Welded Joints

Through repeated tests and optimization of welding parameters, it is found that the best welding parameters for 1 mm copper and 0.5 mm titanium alloy are a pulse current of 25 A, a pulse time of 20 ms, a welding speed of 400 mm/min, a front shielding gas flow rate of 5 L/min, and a back shielding gas flow rate of 3 L/min. Figure 2 is the surface morphology of the weld using the best welding parameters, Figure 2a is the upper surface of the weld, and Figure 2b is the back of the weld. It can be seen from Figure 2 that the surface of the weld is well formed, and there are relatively uniform fish scales, no splash, and no cracks. In general, when Ti alloy is welded, the surface needs to be covered, and argon gas is introduced to protect the surface of the weld from oxidation. When cold welding is used, the welding time is relatively short (20 milliseconds), and the heat input is low. Although the upper surface is not filled with argon gas to protect the weld, the titanium alloy side has almost no oxidation. However, the back side of the weld seam still needs protection. As shown in Figure 2b, the front half of the back of the weld is protected by argon, and neither titanium nor copper is oxidized; the second half is heavily oxidized due to a lack of protection. This is due to the fact that titanium and copper alloys also undergo a melting and solidification process despite the short welding time. Therefore, oxidation will still occur without any protection.
Figure 3 is the microstructure of the cross-section of the weld seam perpendicular to the weld direction. Figure 3a is the macroscopic topography of the weld, and Figure 3b–e are enlarged views of areas I, II, III, and IV in Figure 3a, respectively. It can be seen from Figure 3a that there are no obvious defects, such as porosity and cracks, in the weld, and the boundary between the base metal and the fusion area is clear. It can be inferred from the interface contour line between the titanium alloy base material and the fusion area that the titanium alloy base material is partially melted. It can be seen from Figure 3b–e that the fusion zone (FZ) is mainly composed of needle-like eutectic structures, which are very fine and uniform. The composition of the weld seam at different locations was tested using EPMA in order to study the composition and phase composition of different areas of the joint. The detection location is shown as the no. 1–9 marks in Figure 3b,e, and the composition results are shown in Table 1.
It can be seen from Figure 3b that the grains of the Cu base metal near the FZ have grown significantly. There is a transition layer between the Cu base metal and the fusion zone. According to the analysis of its composition (position 2), the composition of the transition layer and the base metal composition of position 1 are basically the same, indicating that the transition layer has not undergone liquid–solid transformation. Figure 4 is the XRD diffraction pattern of the FZ. The needle-like structure in the FZ is the eutectic tissue of Cu and Cu3Ti, inferred from the composition of positions 3 and 4, combining the Cu-Ti phase diagram. It can be seen from Figure 3c that there is a partial branch crystal structure in the middle of the FZ, and the structure is relatively small. Figure 3d,e are the interfacial microstructure of the Ti base metal and the FZ. It can be seen that there are two transition layers between the Ti base metal and the FZ, and the thickness of the two transition layers is about 15 μm. The transition layers consist of Cu-based solid solutions and a small amount of Ti2Cu3 and TiCu4 based on the composition of positions 6 and 7.
It can be seen from Figure 3c that the microstructure in the FZ is relatively small. The welding joint was tested by a transmission electron microscope (TEM) to further study the phases contained in the FZ and their distribution positions; the results are shown in Figure 5. Figure 5a is the bright field image in the FZ, and Figure 5b is an enlarged view of the location of block I in Figure 5a. It can be seen from Figure 5a,b that the needle-like structure in the FZ is relatively small, with a size of 200−800 nm. Figure 5c,d are the diffraction patterns of area II and area III in Figure 5b, respectively. It can be seen from the analysis that the black area of position II is mainly composed of a Cu3Ti intermetallic compound, and the gray area of position III is composed of the Cu element. That is to say, the FZ is mainly composed of Cu and a small amount of Cu3Ti intermetallic compounds. The following is the detailed analysis:
Because the welding was carried out at a 0.3mm offset from the Cu side, and the thermal conductivity of Cu is higher, the heat diffusion on the Cu side is more complete, and the thickness of the Cu base material is greater than the thickness of the Ti base material; these make the Cu content in the FZ much higher than that of Ti. After XRD analysis and energy spectroscopy, the compound type at positions 3, 4, 5, and 6 in Figure 3 was mainly Cu3Ti. Although the weight ratio of Cu to Ti in the FZ exceeds 9:1, the good thermal conductivity of Cu and the small number of Ti atoms cause a large amount of Cu to precipitate out as solid solution before it has time to react with Ti to form a compound, resulting in the formation of Cu3Ti instead of Cu4Ti. In Figure 6, it can be seen that Cu3Ti precipitates at around 1213 K, so the Cu3Ti in the weld is first precipitated as a solid solution. The Cu3Ti in the weld first adheres to the Cu solid solution surface as a liquid phase, then precipitates gradually as the weld temperature decreases. At position 7, the proximity to the Ti parent material makes the number of Ti atoms more numerous and more uniformly distributed, thus allowing more Cu to react with Ti, so the main compound organization at point 7 is TiCu4.

3.2. Mechanical Properties and Fracture Analysis of Joints

Figure 7 is the mechanical properties test diagram and joint fracture position of the butt-welded Ti/Cu dissimilar metal. It can be seen from Figure 7a that the fracture occurs on the Cu base metal close to the weld seam. The reason may be that the grains of the base metal have grown due to the proximity to the weld seam, as shown in Figure 3b. The following is the detailed analysis:
The high thermal conductivity of Cu causes the base material in the heat-affected zone on the Cu side to grow by heat, resulting in a reduction in its plasticity. The Ti side of the heat-affected zone is also subject to heat growth, but because of the poor thermal conductivity of Ti, the location near the center of the weld melts and becomes the weld zone. The distance has slightly less heat absorption, and thus, the degree of grain growth is relatively small, in addition to the high tensile strength of the Ti base material itself, thus making the Cu side of the heat-affected zone become the weakest position in the mechanical properties of the specimen. This makes the Cu side of the heat-affected zone the weakest location in the specimen in terms of mechanical properties.
However, the grain growth is not obvious due to the low welding line energy, and the maximum tensile force of the joint reaches 2314 N, as shown in Figure 7b by the black curve. After multiple tests, the average tensile strength of the joint is 284 MPa, reaching 83% of the Cu base metal, even though the lowest tensile strength is still 278 MPa, reaching 81% of the Cu base metal. The elongation of the joint is 6.25%, while the elongation of the copper base material is 15%. Compared with the Cu base material, the elongation of the joint decreased by 58.3%, which may be due to the grain growth in the heat-affected zone of the Cu base material. The tensile strength of the joint was significantly improved compared with 151 MPa welded by laser melt brazing [23].
Figure 7c is the fracture surface of butt-welded Ti/Cu dissimilar metal. The fracture surface, outside the two white dotted lines in Figure 7c, is the slip band produced by dislocation slippage, which is due to the fact that the grain boundary slides to the surface when the specimen is subjected to tensile stress. As the tensile test progresses, cracks form on the surface of the specimen when the specimen is deformed to a certain extent, which, in turn, rapidly expands, forming an extended zone located between the white and black dotted lines. The area between the two black curves is the fracture zone; from the large number of ligaments present, it can be inferred that plastic deformation occurred before the joint broke.

3.3. Formation Mechanism of Cu3Ti in the Weld

To elucidate the fundamental reasons why Cu3Ti becomes the dominant intermetallic compound (IMC) in the cold-welded joint, diffusion kinetics calculations and solidification thermodynamics models are combined [24], and an estimation analysis is performed based on the actual conditions of cold welding. As can be seen from the data in Table 1, within the region of approximately 2300 μm covering points 3, 4, 5, and 6 in the FZ of Figure 3, the Ti content ranges from 5.11 wt.% to 5.58 wt.%, whereas in the narrow span of about 60 μm across points 8, 7, 6, and 5, the Ti content drops sharply from 89.1 wt.% to 5.93 wt.%. This is primarily due to the short duration of the molten pool during cold welding and the brief pulse time (20 ms), which leaves insufficient time for atoms to diffuse adequately. According to Fick’s second law:
x = 2 D t
where x is the diffusion distance, D the diffusion coefficient, and t the diffusion time.
Based on the investigation of diffusion in the Cu–Ti system by Iijima et al. [25], the diffusion coefficient of Ti in solid Cu can be expressed by the Arrhenius equation:
D T i C u = ( 0.693 0.135 + 0.169 ) × 10 4 e x p [ 196 ± 2   k J   m o l 1 / R T ] m 2 / s
where R is the gas constant (≈8.314 J·K−1·mol−1) and T is the absolute temperature (K).
Here, it is assumed that the diffusion coefficient in the liquid state is generally about five orders of magnitude higher than that in the solid state. Under the welding conditions, the diffusion coefficient is approximated as:
D 1.4 × 10 7   m 2   s 1
Given the dwell time above the transformation temperature of about 20 ms, taking the effective diffusion time t ≈ 20 ms and D into Equation (1) yields:
x = 2 × 1.4 × 10 7 × 0.02 74.83   μ m
This result shows excellent agreement with the experimentally observed rapid decrease in Ti content over a distance of about 60 μm, confirming that Ti atom diffusion is highly restricted under cold welding conditions.
Because of the low heat input in cold welding, solidification proceeds rapidly. During the solidification of the FZ, Cu precipitates as the primary phase, and Cu3Ti begins to form in the final stages of solidification.
To approximately estimate the Ti concentration in the interdendritic liquid at the end of solidification, the Scheil–Gulliver model [26] is applied, which assumes complete diffusion in the liquid and negligible diffusion in the solid. The following equations relate the solid fraction f S , solute content in the liquid C L , and solute content in the solid C S :
C L w t % = C 0 1 f S k 1
C S w t % = k · C 0 1 f S k 1
where C 0 is the initial alloy concentration and k is the partition coefficient at a given temperature (defined as C L / C s ).
From the phase diagram, k = 0.32. According to Table 1, the atomic ratio is Cu 91.48 at.% and Ti 8.52 at.%. The solid fraction f S is estimated as follows.
Considering the mass balance of Ti in the weld structure:
m T i = m T i   d i s s o l v e d   i n   C u + m T i   i n   I M C
The mass-conservation equation can be written as:
f C u C C u + 1 f C u C I M C = C 0
where f C u is the mass fraction of primary Cu, 1 f C u is the total mass fraction of the IMC phase, C C u is the average Ti content (wt.%) in the primary Cu, C I M C is the average Ti content (wt.%) in the IMC, and C 0 = 6.45% is the initial Ti content of the alloy.
Thus,
f C u = C I M C C 0 C I M C C C u
Since the IMC forms from Ti-enriched liquid at the end of solidification, f C u is approximately equal to the solid fraction f S .
The estimation is based on three considerations: (1) from the phase diagram, the equilibrium partition coefficient of Ti in Cu, k 0 , is about 0.32, and the core composition of dendrites is approximately 2.7 wt.% Ti; (2) the equilibrium solid-solubility limit of Ti in Cu is about 4–5 wt.%; and (3) under rapid cooling, solid-state diffusion is completely suppressed, leading to a significant composition gradient from the core to the periphery of dendrites, with an overall average necessarily higher than the core value but limited by the solid-solubility limit. Accordingly, we take C C u = 3.0 4.0 w t . % as a reasonable range.
The resulting atomic ratio range is 23.32   a t . % < C L < 27.73   a t . % . It can be seen that the estimated atomic ratio is close to the 25 at.% Ti in Cu3Ti and 20 at.% in Cu4Ti, whereas it differs significantly from the required atomic ratios of other IMCs, such as Cu2Ti (33.3 at.% Ti), Cu3Ti4 (57.14 at.% Ti), and Cu2Ti3 (48.5 at.% Ti).
However, the reason why only Cu3Ti forms in the main region of the FZ during weld solidification, while Cu4Ti is not detected, can be proposed as follows:
From the perspective of nucleation thermodynamics, Cu3Ti belongs to the orthorhombic crystal system with space group Pmmn. Each Ti atom is surrounded by 12 Cu atoms, forming a TiCu12 cuboctahedron with only two inequivalent Cu sites. Its atomic arrangement exhibits relatively high symmetry and lower ordering difficulty. The Ti–Cu bond distances (2.55–2.69 Å) align well with the atomic spacing in the Cu matrix (~2.56 Å) [27], resulting in a low interfacial mismatch and small interfacial energy when nucleating on the Cu-based solid solution.
In contrast, although Cu4Ti is also orthorhombic (Pnma space group), it possesses four inequivalent Cu sites. The TiCu12 cuboctahedron must share vertices with 18 CuTi2Cu10 cuboctahedra, leading to significantly higher spatial complexity in the atomic arrangement [28]. Nucleation of Cu4Ti requires precise bonding of Ti atoms with Cu atoms in four distinct coordination environments, involving coordinated rearrangement of more atoms. Under the non-equilibrium conditions of rapid solidification, the thermal energy of atoms is insufficient to overcome the high nucleation barrier of Cu4Ti, completely suppressing its nucleation.
Finally, during solidification, Cu3Ti preferentially nucleates at the interdendritic regions of Cu at 1213 K, followed by rapid growth. It quickly occupies the remaining interdendritic liquid, thereby suppressing the precipitation of Cu4Ti. Consequently, Cu3Ti becomes the dominant intermetallic compound in the weld, while the formation of Cu4Ti is completely inhibited.

3.4. Discussion

This study demonstrates that cold welding effectively joins Ti-6.5Al-1Mo-1V-2Zr alloy to pure copper, overcoming the common challenge of excessive brittle intermetallic compound (IMC) formation reported in fusion-based methods, such as laser and electron beam welding. The joint tensile strength reached 284 MPa, significantly higher than the 147 MPa reported for laser melt brazing and comparable to friction stir welding, while also enabling the welding of thin plates (<1 mm), a notable limitation of the latter. These results confirm the initial hypothesis that low heat input and rapid solidification in cold welding can suppress the formation of multiple harmful IMCs.
Microstructural analysis revealed that the fusion zone consists primarily of Cu and Cu3Ti in a fine eutectic structure, with other IMCs largely absent. This selective formation of Cu3Ti is explained through integrated diffusion kinetics and solidification thermodynamics. The short pulse time (20 ms) limits Ti diffusion, creating a steep composition gradient. Scheil–Gulliver modeling indicates that the Ti concentration in the interdendritic liquid (23.32–27.73 at.%) closely matches the stoichiometry of Cu3Ti (25 at.% Ti), thermodynamically favoring its formation, while kinetic factors, such as its simpler crystal structure, further promote its nucleation under rapid cooling.
The fracture located in the Cu-side heat-affected zone (HAZ) rather than the fusion zone confirms that the tailored microstructure is not the weak point, shifting the performance constraint to the base metal’s thermal response—a more common and addressable issue in welding.
However, this work has limitations. The analysis is based on a single parameter set; therefore, a broader parametric study is needed. The models used are simplified, and long-term performance under fatigue or corrosive conditions remains unexamined. Future research should explore the process parameter window, employ advanced microstructure modeling, investigate post-weld treatments, and examine whether this kinetic control strategy can be applied to other dissimilar metal systems prone to brittle IMCs.

4. Conclusions

The dissimilar materials Ti and Cu were butt-welded successfully by cold welding. The major conclusions of this study can be summarized as follows:
(1) The weld surface is well formed, and there are no obvious defects. Due to the relatively low welding line energy, the front of the weld does not require a drag cover and argon protection, and the titanium alloy surface is not significantly oxidized. However, because the weld has undergone a liquid–solid transformation, the back side still needs protection.
(2) There are two transition layers with a thickness of about 15 μm between the Ti base metal and the FZ. The FZ mainly contains Cu elements, and the Ti base metal has a small amount of melting. The transition layer and fusion region are mainly composed of Cu-based solid solutions and eutectic tissues of Cu and Ti-Cu compounds, and the microstructure is needle-like and relatively small.
(3) The maximum tensile strength of the joint is 284 MPa, reaching 83% of the Cu base metal, and the fracture occurs on the Cu base metal near the weld because the grain in this part is slightly grown. The performance of the joint is significantly improved compared with other hot melt welding, such as laser welding.
(4) The preferential formation of Cu3Ti in the weld is attributed to suppressed atomic diffusion and rapid solidification under cold welding conditions, which thermodynamically and kinetically favor the nucleation of Cu3Ti over other Ti–Cu intermetallic compounds.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.X. and F.L.; methodology, F.L.; software, N.C.; validation, Y.X., F.L. and N.C.; formal analysis, Y.X.; investigation, Y.X. and N.C.; resources, F.L.; data curation, N.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.X. and N.C.; writing—review and editing, F.L.; visualization, N.C.; supervision, F.L.; project administration, Y.X. and F.L.; funding acquisition, F.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51704092).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used Deepseek, v3.2, for the purposes of translating Chinese into English. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ASTMAmerican Society for Testing and Materials
SEMScanning Electron Microscopy
EPMAElectron Probe Micro-Analyzer
XRDX-ray Diffraction
TEMTransmission Electron Microscopy
FZFusion Zone
IMCIntermetallic Compound
HAZHeat-Affected Zone

References

  1. Banerjee, D.; Williams, J.C. Perspectives on titanium science and technology. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 844–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, R.; Tan, C.; You, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhang, S.; Nie, Z.; Yu, X.; Zhao, X. Effect of α phase on high-strain rate deformation behavior of laser melting deposited Ti-6.5Al-1Mo-1V-2Zr titanium alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. 2019, 750, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kar, A.; Suwas, S.; Kailas, S.V. Significance of tool offset and copper interlayer during friction stir welding of aluminum to titanium. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 100, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, G.; Zhou, L.; Zhou, W.; Song, X.; Huang, Y. Influence of dwell time on microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of dissimilar friction stir spot welded aluminum–copper metals. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 2613–2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gladkovsky, S.V.; Kuteneva, S.V.; Sergeev, S.N. Microstructure and mechanical properties of sandwich copper/steel composites produced by explosive welding. Mater. Charact. 2019, 154, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cao, R.; Feng, Z.; Chen, J. Microstructures and properties of titanium–copper lap welded joints by cold metal transfer technology. Mater. Des. 2014, 53, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Paul, H.; Chulist, R.; Miszczyk, M.; Lityńska-Dobrzyńska, L.; Cios, G.; Gałka, A.; Petrzak, P.; Szlezynger, M. Towards a better understanding of the phase transformations in explosively welded copper to titanium sheets. Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. 2020, 784, 139285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guo, S.; Zhou, Q.; Peng, Y.; Xu, X.; Diao, C.; Kong, J.; Luo, T.; Wang, K.; Zhu, J. Study on strengthening mechanism of Ti/Cu electron beam welding. Mater. Des. 2017, 121, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, J.; Zhou, P.; Shi, H.; Wang, L. Influence of filler metal on microstructure and properties of titanium/copper weld joint by GTAW weldments. Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. 2022, 833, 142508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Han, K.; Wang, T.; Tang, Q.; Zhang, B.; Feng, J. Effect of Cu66V34 filler thickness on the microstructure and properties of titanium/copper joint by electron beam welding. J. Mater. Process Technol. 2019, 267, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, G.; Zhang, B.; Liu, W.; Feng, J.-C. Influence of electron-beam superposition welding on intermetallic layer of Cu/Ti joint. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2012, 22, 2416–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gao, X.; Liu, H.; Liu, J.; Yu, H. Laser welding of Ti6Al4V to Cu using a niobium interlayer. J. Mater. Process Technol. 2019, 270, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zeng, Z.; Panton, B.; Oliveira, J.P.; Han, A.; Zhou, Y.N. Dissimilar laser welding of NiTi shape memory alloy and copper. Smart Mater. Struct. 2015, 24, 125036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kimura, M.; Saitoh, Y.; Kusaka, M.; Kaizu, K.; Fuji, A. Effect of friction pressure on joining phenomena of friction welds between pure titanium and pure copper. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 2011, 16, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, S.Y.; Jung, S.B.; Shur, C.C.; Yeon, Y.-M.; Kim, D.-U. Mechanical properties of copper to titanium joined by friction welding. J. Mater. Sci. 2003, 38, 1281–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mahmood, Y.; Chen, P.; Bataev, I.A.; Gao, X. Experimental and numerical investigations of interface properties of Ti6Al4V/CP-Ti/Copper composite plate prepared by explosive welding. Def. Technol. 2021, 17, 1592–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aydın, K.; Kaya, Y.; Kahraman, N. Experimental study of diffusion welding/bonding of titanium to copper. Mater. Des. 2012, 37, 356–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tian, Y.; Shen, J.; Hu, S.; Gou, J.; Kannatey-Asibu, E. Wire and arc additive manufactured Ti–6Al–4V/Al–6.25 Cu dissimilar alloys by CMT-welding: Effect of deposition order on reaction layer. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 2020, 25, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, L.; Dong, H.; Ma, Y.; Li, P.; Wang, J.; Yang, J.; Wu, B. Interfacial layer regulation and its effect on mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy and T2 copper dissimilar joints by cold metal transfer welding. J. Manuf. Process 2022, 75, 1100–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Peng, J.; Xie, S.; Chen, T.; Wang, X.; Yu, X.; Yang, L.; Ni, Z.; Ling, Z.; Yuan, Z.; Shi, J.; et al. Numerical Simulation and Process Optimization of Laser Welding in 6056 Aluminum Alloy T-Joints. Crystals 2025, 15, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peng, J.; Xie, S.; Tian, Y.; Wang, X.; Yu, X.; Chen, N.; Yuan, Z.; Han, P.; Xia, H.; Wang, P.; et al. Numerical simulation and process parameter optimization of laser spot welding for ultra-thin sheets. Opt. Laser Technol. 2026, 193, 114240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. ASTM E8/E8M-2021; Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  23. Zhao, Y.; Wang, W.; Yan, K.; Liu, C.; Zou, J. Microstructure and properties of Cu/Ti laser welded joints. J. Mater. Process Technol. 2017, 257, 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kar, A.; Kailas, S.V.; Suwas, S. Formation sequence of intermetallics and kinetics of reaction layer growth during solid state reaction between titanium and aluminum. Materialia 2020, 11, 100702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Iijima, Y.; Hoshino, K.; Hirano, K.I. Diffusion of titanium in copper. Met. Trans A 1977, 8, 997–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schaffnit, P.; Stallybrass, C.; Konrad, J.; Stein, F.; Weinberg, M. A Scheil–Gulliver model dedicated to the solidification of steel. Calphad 2015, 48, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Data Retrieved from the Materials Project for TiCu3 (mp-12546) from Database Version v2025.09.25. Available online: https://next-gen.materialsproject.org/materials/mp-12546 (accessed on 30 November 2025).
  28. Data Retrieved from the Materials Project for TiCu4 (mp-1188441) from Database Version v2025.09.25. Available online: https://next-gen.materialsproject.org/materials/mp-1188441 (accessed on 30 November 2025).
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of Ti/Cu dissimilar metal butt welding and tensile specimen size: (a) the schematic diagram of Ti/Cu dissimilar metal butt welding; (b) the tensile specimen size diagram.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of Ti/Cu dissimilar metal butt welding and tensile specimen size: (a) the schematic diagram of Ti/Cu dissimilar metal butt welding; (b) the tensile specimen size diagram.
Materials 19 00197 g001
Figure 2. The surface morphology of the weld as observed by an optical microscope: (a) the front morphology of the weld; (b) the back morphology with and without argon protection.
Figure 2. The surface morphology of the weld as observed by an optical microscope: (a) the front morphology of the weld; (b) the back morphology with and without argon protection.
Materials 19 00197 g002
Figure 3. The microstructure of the weld seam. (a) is the macroscopic topography of the weld, and (b), (c), (d), and (e) are enlarged views of areas I, II, III, and IV in Figure 3a, respectively.
Figure 3. The microstructure of the weld seam. (a) is the macroscopic topography of the weld, and (b), (c), (d), and (e) are enlarged views of areas I, II, III, and IV in Figure 3a, respectively.
Materials 19 00197 g003
Figure 4. XRD diffraction pattern of the FZ.
Figure 4. XRD diffraction pattern of the FZ.
Materials 19 00197 g004
Figure 5. TEM images of the FZ: (a) bright field image of the FZ; (b) higher-magnification image of the red box in (a), (c), and (d) are the diffraction patterns of area II and area III in (b), respectively.
Figure 5. TEM images of the FZ: (a) bright field image of the FZ; (b) higher-magnification image of the red box in (a), (c), and (d) are the diffraction patterns of area II and area III in (b), respectively.
Materials 19 00197 g005
Figure 6. Binary equilibrium diagram of Ti/Cu.
Figure 6. Binary equilibrium diagram of Ti/Cu.
Materials 19 00197 g006
Figure 7. The property test of butt-welded Ti/Cu dissimilar metal: (a) the fracture location of the joint; (b) the tensile strength of Cu base material and joints; (c) the fracture surface of butt-welded Ti/Cu dissimilar metal.
Figure 7. The property test of butt-welded Ti/Cu dissimilar metal: (a) the fracture location of the joint; (b) the tensile strength of Cu base material and joints; (c) the fracture surface of butt-welded Ti/Cu dissimilar metal.
Materials 19 00197 g007
Table 1. Chemical compositions of different areas detected using EPMA.
Table 1. Chemical compositions of different areas detected using EPMA.
Serial NumberPercentage Composition (wt. %)Inference composition
CuTiAlZrV
199.66-0.34--Cu
299.06-0.94--Cu
393.245.111.310.090.25(Cu), Cu3Ti
492.056.451.150.130.22(Cu), Cu3Ti
591.505.932.030.080.46(Cu), Cu3Ti
689.645.583.950.240.59(Cu), Cu3Ti
780.8315.122.660.151.24(Cu), TiCu4
80.1289.105.510.065.21(Ti), TiAl3
90.0891.546.38-2.01(Ti), TiAl3
Note: (Cu) and (Ti) in the table represent Cu-based and Ti-based solutions, respectively.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiao, Y.; Liu, F.; Chen, N. Characterization of Ti/Cu Dissimilar Metal Butt-Welded by the Cold Welding Process. Materials 2026, 19, 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19010197

AMA Style

Xiao Y, Liu F, Chen N. Characterization of Ti/Cu Dissimilar Metal Butt-Welded by the Cold Welding Process. Materials. 2026; 19(1):197. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19010197

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xiao, Yunyi, Fei Liu, and Nuo Chen. 2026. "Characterization of Ti/Cu Dissimilar Metal Butt-Welded by the Cold Welding Process" Materials 19, no. 1: 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19010197

APA Style

Xiao, Y., Liu, F., & Chen, N. (2026). Characterization of Ti/Cu Dissimilar Metal Butt-Welded by the Cold Welding Process. Materials, 19(1), 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19010197

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop