Next Article in Journal
Electroanalysis of Apocynin Part 2: Investigations on a Boron-Doped Diamond Electrode in Aqueous Buffered Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation, Thermal, and Optical Properties of D-A-Type Molecules Based on 1,3,5-Triazine for Violet-Blue Fluorescent Materials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Elemental Iron Containing Bauxite Residue Obtained After Electroreduction on High-Pressure Alkaline Leaching of Boehmitic Bauxite and Subsequent Thickening Rate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Metallurgical Process Simulation and Optimization—2nd Volume

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Metallurgy, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(9), 2037; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18092037 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 27 February 2025 / Accepted: 8 April 2025 / Published: 29 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metallurgical Process Simulation and Optimization2nd Volume)
As the cornerstone of industrial civilization, metallurgical engineering has consistently driven materials innovation and advanced manufacturing technologies. With the global surge in demand for high-performance steels, lightweight alloys, and sustainable production, traditional metallurgical processes face critical challenges, such as complex process variables, resource shortage, and stringent environmental regulations. This Special Issue, “Metallurgical Process Simulation and Optimization—2nd Volume”, highlights recent advancements in simulating and optimizing metallurgical processes through 19 cutting-edge articles.
Data-driven approaches and reaction kinetics are revolutionizing steelmaking by enhancing parameter optimization, reaction efficiency, and intelligent transformation. Susana et al. [1] identified sulfur partition coefficients as critical indicators for calcium-treated aluminum-killed steel, linking them to slag composition via Pearson correlation analysis. Complementing this, Zhang et al. [2] revealed that 2CaO·SiO₂ layers formed during lime dissolution hinder mass transfer in converter slag, offering strategies to refine slag formulations. Dynamic simulation models further optimized the steelmaking-continuous casting process, reducing total completion time by 8.7 minutes through furnace–machine coordination [3]. In electric arc furnaces, Zhang et al. [4] decoupled nitrogen absorption/desorption kinetics, demonstrating that increasing argon flow rates (100–300 mL/min) quadrupled denitrification constants.
Continuous casting relies on precise flow-field control and solidification uniformity. Li et al. [5] redesigned a four-strand tundish using water modeling, reducing dead zones from 36.47% to 17.59% via optimized baffles. For ultra-wide slab casting, Li et al. [6] correlated casting speed (0.9–1.4 m/min) with surface flow activity, showing a 49% reduction in low-velocity zones. Large eddy simulations quantified mold level fluctuations, establishing a linear relationship between surface velocity (20–60 mm/s) and level oscillations (3–4 mm) [7]. Electromagnetic stirring (M-EMS) and nozzle innovations have been proven to be quite effective. It has been demonstrated that M-EMS mitigates uneven solidification in round billets, while swirl flow nozzles (SFN) reduced slag entrapment by lowering tangential velocity (−15° SFN: 5.07 mm) [8,9]. These advancements highlight the importance of flow-field precision.
Tailoring alloys for corrosion resistance and high-temperature performance remains effective to metallurgy. Liu et al. [10] and Wang et al. [11] enhanced HRB400 rebar and GH4169 superalloys via Cr, RE, and Y additions. Cr stabilized passive films, while RE reduced pitting via (RE)2O2S inclusions. Yttrium (0.04 wt.%) minimized oxidation layer thickness by 30%, improving high-temperature adhesion. In aluminum refining, Aleksandar et al. [12] modeled impurity evaporation (Cd, Hg, Pb, Zn) using logistic functions, identifying transition temperatures (e.g., Zn: 860 °C). Long et al. [13] explored CaO-Al2O3-BaO-CaF2-Li2O mold fluxes, showing that Al2O3 additions reduced devitrification activation energy (314.16→269.46 kJ/mol), accelerating crystallization.
Numerical simulations and sustainable practices are reshaping metallurgy. Tian et al. [14] coupled VOF and DPM models to map bubble dynamics in slab casting, identifying nozzle regions as hotspots for coalescence/fragmentation (average diameter: 0.741 mm). Zhang et al. [15] optimized RH degasser nozzles, achieving 29.8 m3/h circulation flow with a 127–87 symmetric layout. Sustainable practices were advanced in this study, where electrolytic reduction in bauxite residue halved activation energy (32.9→17.2 kJ/mol) for Boehmitic leaching, while improving thickening efficiency by 1.5× [16]. Wang et al. [17] linked coke layer thickness to blast furnace permeability, proposing melt droplet metrics to balance gas flow and coke degradation. Wang et al. [18] reviewed induction heating tundishes, emphasizing their role in low-superheat casting for specialty steels—a technology refined since 1984. Wang et al. [19] optimized mold cooling, showing that extending effective length by 100 mm increased heat transfer by 19%, critical for high-speed casting.
This Special Issue underscores the important role of simulation and optimization in addressing metallurgical challenges. From data-driven steelmaking to sustainable resource recovery, these studies bridge fundamental research and industrial application. We believe that these advancements will catalyze further innovations, driving the metallurgical industry toward better efficiency and sustainability.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U21A20112, 52374322).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carrasco-López, S.; Herrera-Trejo, M.; Castro-Román, M.; Castro-Uresti, F.; Castro-Cedeño, E.I. Analysis of the Steelmaking Process via Data Mining and Pearson Correlation. Materials 2024, 17, 2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, M.; Li, J.; Jia, C.; Yu, Y. Dissolution Behavior of Lime with Different Properties into Converter Slag. Materials 2023, 16, 6487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shao, X.; Liu, Q.; Chen, H.; Zhang, J.; Gao, S.; Li, S. Simulation Model of a Steelmaking–Continuous Casting Process Based on Dynamic-Operation Rules. Materials 2024, 17, 4352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, F.; Li, J.; Liu, W.; Jiao, A. The Thermodynamics and Kinetics of a Nitrogen Reaction in an Electric Arc Furnace Smelting Process. Materials 2023, 16, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, Q.; Qin, B.; Zhang, J.; Dong, H.; Li, M.; Tao, B.; Mao, X.; Liu, Q. Design Improvement of Four-Strand Continuous-Casting Tundish Using Physical and Numerical Simulation. Materials 2023, 16, 849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, G.; Tu, L.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, X.; He, S. Fluid Flow in Continuous Casting Mold for Ultra-Wide Slab. Materials 2023, 16, 1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tian, Y.; Zhou, H.; Wang, G.; Xu, L.; Qiu, S.; Zhu, R. Numerical Modeling of Transient Flow Characteristics on the Top Surface of a Steel Slab Continuous Casting Strand Using a Large Eddy Simulation Combined with Volume of Fluid Model. Materials 2023, 16, 5665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, P.; Xiao, H.; Zhang, Z.; Li, S.; Zhang, J. Behavior of Mold Electromagnetic Stirring for Round Bloom Castings and Its Eccentric Stirring Problem. Materials 2022, 15, 8814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wang, J.; Zhu, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, W.; Qiu, G.; Li, X. Effect of Swirling Flow Nozzle on Fluid Flow and Solidification in a Round Bloom Continuous Casting Mold. Materials 2022, 15, 8474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Liu, T.; Li, N.; Liu, C.; Li, J.; Zhang, T.; Cheng, X.; Yang, S. Attempt to Optimize the Corrosion Resistance of HRB400 Steel Rebar with Cr and RE. Materials 2022, 15, 8269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wang, T.; Liu, W.; Yang, S.; Li, J.; Zhao, P.; Xue, H. Effect of Yttrium Additions on the High-Temperature Oxidation Behavior of GH4169 Ni-Based Superalloy. Materials 2024, 17, 2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mitrašinović, A.M.; Nešković, J.; Polavder, S.; Petković, S.; Praštalo, Ž.; Labus, N.; Radosavljević, M. Modeling of Impurities Evaporation Reaction Order in Aluminum Alloys by the Parametric Fitting of the Logistic Function. Materials 2024, 17, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Long, X.; Long, S.; Luo, W.; Li, X.; Tu, C.; Na, Y.; Xu, J. Crystallization of Slag Films of CaO-Al2O3-BaO-CaF2-Li2O-Based Mold Fluxes for High-Aluminum Steels’ Continuous Casting. Materials 2023, 16, 1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tian, Y.; Xu, L.; Qiu, S.; Zhu, R. Simulation of Spatial Distribution of Multi-Size Bubbles in a Slab Continuous-Casting Mold Water Model. Materials 2023, 16, 4666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, Z.; Ma, P.; Dong, J.; Liu, M.; Liu, Y.; Lai, C. Effects of Different RH Degasser Nozzle Layouts on the Circulating Flow Rate. Materials 2022, 15, 8476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shoppert, A.; Loginova, I.; Diallo, M.M.; Valeev, D. Effect of Elemental Iron Containing Bauxite Residue Obtained After Electroreduction on High-Pressure Alkaline Leaching of Boehmitic Bauxite and Subsequent Thickening Rate. Materials 2025, 18, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.H.; Du, P.; Diao, J.; Xie, B.; Zhu, M.H. Study on the High-Temperature Interaction between Coke and Iron Ores with Different Layer Thicknesses. Materials 2024, 17, 1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Yue, Q.; Xiao, H. Channel-Type Induction Heating Tundish Technology for Continuous Casting: A Review. Materials 2023, 16, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, S.; Xu, P.; Zhou, Y.; Duan, H.; Chen, D.; Long, M. The Effect of Mold Structure and Cooling Parameters on Heat Transfer during Billet High-Speed Continuous Casting. Materials 2023, 16, 3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Tang, J.; Liu, Q. Metallurgical Process Simulation and Optimization—2nd Volume. Materials 2025, 18, 2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18092037

AMA Style

Zhang J, Tang J, Liu Q. Metallurgical Process Simulation and Optimization—2nd Volume. Materials. 2025; 18(9):2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18092037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jiangshan, Jiali Tang, and Qing Liu. 2025. "Metallurgical Process Simulation and Optimization—2nd Volume" Materials 18, no. 9: 2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18092037

APA Style

Zhang, J., Tang, J., & Liu, Q. (2025). Metallurgical Process Simulation and Optimization—2nd Volume. Materials, 18(9), 2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18092037

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop