Next Article in Journal
Optical and Dielectric Properties of BaF2:(Er,Yb) Co-Doped Crystal
Previous Article in Journal
Coated Mg Alloy Implants: A Spontaneous Wettability Transition Process with Excellent Antibacterial and Osteogenic Functions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Convolution-Based Coding Metasurface for Wide-Angle Beam Steering for Enhanced 5G Wireless Communications

1
School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China
2
College of Communication and Information Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(9), 1913; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18091913
Submission received: 28 February 2025 / Revised: 10 April 2025 / Accepted: 22 April 2025 / Published: 23 April 2025

Abstract

:
With the rapid development of 5G communication technology, there is an increasing demand for high-performance antennas and beam control technologies, making the development of novel metamaterial structures capable of precise electromagnetic wave manipulation a current research hotspot. This paper presents a coding metasurface specifically designed for 5G communication applications, operating at a frequency of 3.5 GHz. The design employs a unique annular metasurface unit structure capable of achieving both single-beam and dual-beam functionalities. Through convolution operations, precise control over the reflection angle is achieved, with an adjustable range from 51.5° to 17.5° and a resolution of 10°. This design overcomes the inherent limitations of traditional gradient coding methods, providing a comprehensive framework for wide-angle reflection control in metasurface design. The research results demonstrate that the coding metasurface can effectively control the reflection direction of electromagnetic waves at 3.5 GHz, exhibiting dual-polarization modulation capabilities and maintaining stable performance under oblique incidence conditions within 20°. Experimental validation confirms the beam control functionality of the design in real-world environments, highlighting its potential to enhance signal reception sensitivity and transmission efficiency in 5G wireless communications. This work opens new avenues for research in reconfigurable and intelligent metasurfaces, with potential applications extending beyond 5G to future 6G networks and Internet of Things (IoT) systems.

1. Introduction

Over the past decades, metasurfaces have emerged as a transformative technology in electromagnetic wave manipulation, attracting significant attention from researchers due to their unique electromagnetic properties that are unattainable in natural materials. As two-dimensional planar structures composed of subwavelength-scale artificial units, metasurfaces have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in controlling the propagation direction and phase distribution of electromagnetic waves, thereby enhancing signal strength and extending coverage range in communication systems [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The field witnessed a paradigm shift in 2014 with the introduction of digital coding and programmable metasurfaces, enabling unprecedented digital control over electromagnetic waves [7]. The fundamental 1-bit coding metasurface, comprising two distinct elements marked as ‘0’ and ‘1’ with phase states of 0° and 180°, respectively, has been extended to multi-bit configurations through phase discretization within 360°. This advancement allows for sophisticated directional control of single-beam, dual-beam, and multi-beam patterns [8,9,10]. Furthermore, the integration of digital convolution operations with coding metasurfaces has enabled precise scattering pattern shifts, facilitating beam rotation to desired directions with minimal deformation and enabling arbitrary angle beam scanning in free space [11].
The advent of 5G wireless communication technology, characterized by its high-speed data transmission, low latency, and large network capacity, has revolutionized modern communication paradigms. Within this context, the 3.5 GHz frequency band has emerged as a cornerstone for initial 5G network deployment. Compared to higher frequency bands, such as millimeter wave, the 3.5 GHz band offers distinct advantages including lower propagation losses, extended transmission distances, broader base station coverage, and reduced network deployment costs. Recognizing these benefits, this study focuses on developing a coding metasurface specifically designed for operation at 3.5 GHz, ensuring optimal compatibility with practical 5G deployment scenarios.
Recent advancements in 3.5 GHz metasurface-assisted communication systems have primarily focused on electromagnetic beam control, leveraging the ability of metasurfaces to manipulate phase, amplitude, and polarization characteristics through precise unit structure design [12,13,14,15]. A significant breakthrough occurred in 2023 with the development of a passive lossless metasurface capable of arbitrary multi-beam direction and power control through surface wave manipulation, demonstrating precise control over reflected beams at 30°and 60° with both equal and unequal power distribution [16]. The integration of digital convolution operations has further enhanced metasurface capabilities, enabling flexible control over electromagnetic wave refraction and reflection. This capability proves particularly valuable in addressing coverage blind spots caused by obstacles or propagation losses, effectively extending communication signal coverage and modifying propagation paths. Notable contributions include Zhang et al.’s [17] 2-bit reconfigurable intelligent metasurface-assisted communication system at 3.5 GHz, which achieved multi-beam reflection at various angles with a 40 MHz bandwidth, and Zhao et al.’s [18] innovative three-layer C-type coding metasurface in the terahertz range, demonstrating a 52° deflection angle at 0.71 THz with 76% deflection efficiency through convolution calculations. These advancements collectively underscore the transformative potential of coding metasurfaces in next-generation communication systems.
In this study, we propose an innovative coding metasurface tailored for 5G communication systems, operating at the 3.5 GHz frequency band, which is widely recognized as a key frequency for 5G deployment due to its optimal balance between coverage and data transmission capabilities. The design features a unique annular metasurface unit configuration capable of supporting both single-beam and dual-beam functionalities, providing enhanced flexibility for diverse communication scenarios. The coding sequences of two or three arrays are optimized by using convolution operation, achieving wide-angle beam deflection from 51.5° to 17.5° at intervals of 10°. This significantly expands the angular range of beam control and improves the signal coverage capability. Compared to the traditional design methods that rely on complex optimization algorithms, the design method based on convolution operation proposed in this paper has higher computational efficiency and operability, providing a new idea for the design of metasurfaces.

2. Conception and Design

Figure 1 illustrates the functional realization of coding metasurfaces under vertically incident plane waves, demonstrating both single-beam and multi-beam deflection capabilities. By strategically designing the coding metasurface, precise control over beam deflection directions can be achieved, enabling large-angle and flexible beam steering for both single and multiple beams. The image includes a detailed schematic of the metasurface unit structure, highlighting the specific design features that facilitate these advanced functionalities. This schematic provides insight into the structural configuration and operational principles underlying the metasurface’s ability to manipulate electromagnetic waves with high precision.
The coding element is composed of two copper layers, each with a thickness of 0.035 mm, separated by F4B substrates (εr = 2.2, tan δ = 0.001) with a thickness of h = 5 mm. The top layer features a circular metal patch with an outer side length denoted as ‘a’ and a width of ‘w’. The periodicity of the coding element is set at p = 21.5 mm, as depicted in Figure 2. This annular metasurface structure, initially proposed in [19], serves as the foundation for the current design. In this work, we significantly expand the tunable range of the reflection angle and fabricate a metasurface sample to experimentally validate its performance, thereby advancing the practical application of this innovative design.
The metasurface units are encoded by selecting two distinct units with a phase difference of 180°, characterized by patch side lengths ‘a’ of 21.5 mm and 17.5 mm, respectively. These units are digitally represented as “0” and “1”, forming the basis of a 1-bit coding metasurface. To achieve higher phase resolution, four units with a phase difference of 90° are incorporated, with patch side lengths ‘a’ of 21.5 mm, 18.8 mm, 17.5 mm, and 15.3 mm, corresponding to phase states of 0°, 90°, 180°, and 271°, respectively. These four units are digitally encoded as 0, 1, 2, and 3 (or equivalently represented in binary as “00”, “01”, “10”, and “11”), as comprehensively outlined in Table 1. This multi-bit encoding approach enhances the metasurface’s capability for precise phase manipulation and advanced beam control.
Electromagnetic simulation analysis was performed on the unit structure, and the resulting reflection amplitude and phase characteristics are presented in Figure 3. At the target frequency of 3.5 GHz, x- and y-polarized incident waves were vertically incident along the z-axis. As shown in Figure 3a, the reflection amplitude exceeds 0.97, indicating high reflectivity efficiency. Figure 3b reveals that the reflection phase achieves a 90° phase difference across the four coding states, with a phase deviation maintained within 90° ± 10° over the frequency range of 3.4 to 3.6 GHz, corresponding to an operational bandwidth of 214 MHz. Owing to the centrosymmetric configuration of the unit structure, identical amplitude and phase responses are observed for both x- and y-polarized waves, demonstrating the dual-polarization modulation capability of the designed metasurface unit.
In practical deployment scenarios, where metasurfaces are employed to enhance signal strength, the transmitter and receiver are typically positioned at different azimuths, resulting in varying incident angles, as signals impinge on the metasurface. This practical consideration necessitates the careful structural design of the metasurface. To address this, we systematically investigated the effects of oblique incidence on the metasurface unit’s performance. Simulations were conducted for incident angles of θ = 0°, 10°, and 20°, with the corresponding reflection characteristics illustrated in Figure 4. The results demonstrate that, for incident angles within 20°, the reflection amplitude exhibits minimal variation (ΔA = 0.0003), while the reflection phase shows a moderate change of 13.6°. These findings indicate that the metasurface unit maintains stable performance under oblique incidence conditions up to 20°, with negligible impact on both reflection amplitude and phase characteristics. This robust angular stability is crucial for practical applications in real-world communication scenarios.

3. Results and Discussion

Under the condition of vertical incidence of a plane wave, when a one-dimensional coding pattern is employed (i.e., the coding varies only along a single direction, such as the x-axis or y-axis), the elevation angle can be simply expressed by Equation (1):
θ = s i n 1 λ Γ
where θ is the deflection angle, λ is the wavelength of the operating frequency in free space, and Γ is the period of the coding pattern. The elevation angle is directly related to the period length of the coding gradient sequence, and by adjusting the period length, reflection beams with different elevation angles can be achieved. Based on this equation, four coding arrays were designed with intervals of 10°, targeting angles of 40°, 30°, 20°, and 10°, respectively. The period lengths corresponding to each target angle were calculated according to Equation (1), and using the two designed phase gradient metasurface unit structures (with a phase difference of 180°) as the basic units, a 20 × 20 coding metasurface array was constructed. The four designed coding sequences are arranged one-dimensionally along the x-axis as follows: 00011100011100011100; 00001111000011110000; 00000011111100000011; 00000000000111111111. These coding sequences are extended along the y-axis to form coding arrays, denoted as N1, N2, N3, and N4, respectively. The coding periods calculated based on the target angles are 129 mm, 172 mm, 258 mm, and 473 mm, and the reflection angles calculated using Equation (1) are 41.6°, 29.9°, 19.4°, and 10.4°, with specific results shown in Table 2. This systematic approach demonstrates the precise control over beam deflection achievable through tailored coding sequences and period adjustments, highlighting the versatility of the proposed metasurface design.
The simulation results for the N1, N2, N3, and N4 coding arrays are presented in Figure 5. As depicted in the figure, the incident plane wave generates symmetric dual beams upon interaction with the 1-bit coded metasurface. The symmetric reflected main beams for the four coding arrays are directed at angles of 41.6°, 29.9°, 19.4°, and 10.4°, respectively, aligning precisely with the calculated values in Table 2. The far-field radiation patterns illustrate the reflection intensities of the main lobes, with peak radiation intensities reaching 13.6 dBsm, 13.1 dBsm, 13.7 dBsm, and 14.8 dBsm for the four coding arrays, respectively. These results demonstrate the effective beam-splitting capability of the designed metasurface.
Figure 6 further highlights the performance of the four 1-bit coding arrays, which achieve symmetric dual beams at 10° intervals, specifically at 10.4°, 19.4°, 29.9°, and 41.6°. For comparison, the all-“0” coding state was simulated as a control case. In this configuration, all units are in the same state, resulting in no phase difference, and the reflection characteristics resemble those of a metallic plate, with the main beam reflected at 0°and a high reflection efficiency of 0.94 dB. In contrast, the N1, N2, N3, and N4 coding arrays, leveraging phase differences, exhibit a gradual reduction in the 0° normal reflection intensity (with a slight decrease of approximately 0.1 dB in reflection efficiency compared to the all-“0” case), while splitting into two symmetric beams about the xoz plane. As the energy shifts from the 0° main beam to the symmetric dual beams, the beam amplitude correspondingly decreases, confirming the successful implementation of beam steering through phase modulation. These findings underscore the versatility and precision of the proposed coding metasurface design in achieving controlled beam deflection, while maintaining high reflection efficiency.
To achieve more precise control over single-beam deflection angles, this study employs four phase gradient metasurface unit structures (with a phase difference of 90°) as the fundamental building blocks to construct a 20 × 20 2-bit coding metasurface. Five one-dimensional coding sequences, periodically arranged along the x-axis, were designed as follows: 00112233001122330011;00011122233300011122;00001111222233330000;00000111112222233333;00000011111122222233. These coding sequences were extended along the y-axis to form 20 × 20 coding arrays, designated as P1, P2, P3, P4, and P5, respectively. The 2-bit coding period Γ and the corresponding elevation angle θ were calculated using Equation (1), with detailed results summarized in Table 3.
Simulation analysis was performed on the 2-bit coding arrays, and Figure 7 presents the far-field radiation patterns and Cartesian coordinate system radiation diagrams for arrays P1 to P5. The simulation results demonstrate that, under the 2-bit phase coding configuration, a vertically incident beam along the z-axis generates a single reflected beam. The main beams are directed at angles of 29.9°, 19.4°, 14.4°, 11.5°, and 9.6°, respectively, confirming the metasurface’s capability for precise single-beam deflection control. These findings highlight the enhanced flexibility and accuracy of the 2-bit coding approach in achieving tailored beam steering.
According to the principle described by Equation (1), the 2-bit periodic arrangement achieves the target elevation angle by specifying the coding period length. However, this method exhibits inherent limitations in terms of angular control precision and flexibility. To enhance the elevation angle control performance, this study employs Fourier convolution operations to process the basic coding sequences, enabling more versatile and precise control over the deflection angle of the reflected beam. The electric field distribution of the coding metasurface and its far-field radiation pattern are governed by a Fourier transform relationship, i.e., the coding array can be analogized to the time domain signal in digital signal processing, while the far-field radiation pattern corresponds to the frequency domain signal. According to the convolution theorem, the product of two signals in the time domain is equivalent to their convolution in the frequency domain, which can be expressed as [11]:
f t g ( t ) F F T f ω g ( ω )
where f(t) and g(t) represent the initial coding metasurface array and a phase gradient metasurface array, respectively. The convolution theorem implies that the product of the initial coding metasurface array and a phase gradient metasurface array will shift the reflected beam from its original direction. The elevation angle of the resulting coding metasurface can be expressed as:
θ = s i n 1 s i n θ 1 ± s i n θ 2
where θ1 and θ2 are the elevation angles of the two initial coding metasurfaces. This approach provides a mathematical framework for achieving enhanced beam steering capabilities through the superposition of phase gradients, significantly improving the flexibility and precision of angle control in metasurface design.
By applying the convolution operation to the previously described P1 and P5 coding arrangements, the phase distributions of the P1 and P5 sequences are combined to form a new coding metasurface, designated as A3. According to Equation (3), under identical excitation conditions, the A3 metasurface generates a single reflected beam with a deflection angle of 41.8° and a main lobe reflection intensity of 15.8 dBsm, as illustrated in Figure 8f. This result demonstrates that, under one-dimensional phase gradient coding, the convolution of two coding arrangements with relatively limited beam control capabilities can produce a single-beam deflection with a significantly expanded angular range. This approach provides a practical and effective method for enhancing the control performance of reflected beams, offering greater flexibility in metasurface design for advanced beam steering applications.
Building on this methodology, the five phase gradient coding metasurfaces (P1, P2, P3, P4, and P5) were subjected to multiple superposition and hybrid addition–subtraction operations to derive additional arrangement configurations and controllable reflection angles, validated through computational simulations and experimental measurements. Linear superposition operations were applied to the selected metasurfaces, yielding the following sequences: A1 = P2 + P3 + P4, A2 = P1 + P3, A3 = P1 + P5, A4 = P1 + P2 − P4, A5 = P2 + P3, A6 = P3 + P5, and A7 = P1 − P4. The corresponding simulation and experimental results are summarized in Table 4. These seven distinct metasurface arrangements enable reflection angle variations spanning from 51.5° to 17.5°, with angular gradients controlled within 10° and main lobe reflection intensities ranging from 12 to 15.8 dBsm. The results demonstrate that convolution operations on the coding metasurface significantly expand the controllable range of reflection angles. While the traditional method of extending the period length achieves a maximum deflection angle of 41.6°, the application of convolution operations extends this range to 51.5°. Furthermore, Table 4 reveals that the main lobe amplitudes remain relatively stable after convolution operations, indicating that beam energy remains concentrated in the main beam direction. This ensures precise beam pointing accuracy, highlighting the effectiveness of the proposed approach in enhancing the performance and flexibility of metasurface-based beam steering systems.
Table 5 provides a comprehensive comparison of key performance metrics, including operating frequency, polarization, the maximum deflection angle, the experimental angle, half-power beamwidth, the number of beams, and bandwidth, across various studies. Compared to Ref. [20], both this paper and Ref. [20] have carried out measured verification at a deflection angle of 30°. The metasurface designed in this paper achieves an operating bandwidth of 214 MHz under a deflection of 30° and has dual-polarization characteristics. It can simultaneously support the independent manipulation of x-polarized and y-polarized incident waves, significantly improving its applicability and flexibility in multi-polarization scenarios. In contrast, Ref. [20] only supports single-polarization characteristics and has a narrow bandwidth, which limits its adaptability in practical applications.
In addition, compared to reference [17], although both operate in the 3.5 GHz frequency band, the metasurface designed in this paper can achieve a maximum deflection angle of up to 51.5° and supports precise single-beam manipulation. In the case of a 30° deflection, the half-power beamwidth of this paper is 6.3°, demonstrating excellent beam focusing ability. These performance advantages indicate that the metasurface designed in this paper has significant competitiveness in terms of deflection angle, bandwidth, polarization characteristics, and beam manipulation accuracy, providing an important reference for the design of future broadband and multi-polarized electromagnetic manipulation devices.
This work innovatively integrates multi-bit coding with a ring-shaped metasurface unit structure, achieving significant breakthroughs in engineering applications: a beam-steering system with precise 10° intervals (from 17.5° to 51.5°) has been successfully designed, meeting the practical requirements of 5G communication for beamforming. Compared to ref. [11], which only demonstrated basic scattering modes in the terahertz band, the innovations of this work include the following: (1) the adoption of multi-bit coding technology significantly enhances the flexibility and reliability of beam manipulation; (2) the ring-shaped metasurface unit structure markedly improves structural stability and fabrication feasibility; and (3) the design is optimized for the multi-polarization requirements and practical deployment scenarios of 5G communication, endowing the system with superior environmental adaptability. These technological advancements demonstrate the substantial advantages of the proposed approach in terms of engineering practicality and industrial potential.

4. Experimental Verification

Based on the proposed unit cell design, a coding array with a deflection angle of 30° was implemented using the coding sequence 00112233001122330011. Considering fabrication limitations, a prototype array comprising 20 × 20 unit cells with overall dimensions of 430 × 430 mm2 was fabricated for experimental validation.
The far-field radiation characteristics of the 2-bit coding array were numerically investigated under different polarization conditions, as illustrated in Figure 9. Specifically, Figure 9a presents the Cartesian radiation pattern of the metasurface under x-polarized incidence at (θ = −30°, φ = 0°), while Figure 9b demonstrates the corresponding pattern under y-polarized incidence at (θ = 30°, φ = 180°). The simulated results reveal nearly identical beam directions and radiation amplitudes for both polarization states, confirming the polarization-insensitive property of the proposed metasurface design. This characteristic is particularly advantageous for practical applications where polarization-independent performance is required.
To experimentally validate the beam-steering capability of the proposed coding metasurface in practical scenarios, a prototype comprising a 20 × 20 unit cell array with overall dimensions of 430 × 430 mm² was fabricated, as illustrated in Figure 10a,b. The far-field scattering characteristics were characterized in a microwave anechoic chamber using a custom-built measurement setup. The experimental configuration employed a linearly polarized horn antenna (operational frequency range: 1–18 GHz) as the transmitting source, with both the source and metasurface mounted on a computer-controlled rotational stage to enable 360° azimuthal scanning in the horizontal plane. A receiving antenna, identical in specifications to the transmitting antenna, was positioned at a far-field distance of approximately 5 m from the turntable to capture the scattered electromagnetic waves from the metasurface, as schematically depicted in Figure 10b. The beam-steering performance evaluation was conducted at 3.5 GHz using the free-space measurement technique, ensuring far-field conditions and minimizing environmental interference.
The far-field scattering characteristics of the fabricated coding metasurface array under different polarization excitations are systematically investigated in Figure 11. As demonstrated in Figure 11a, when illuminated by an x-polarized plane wave propagating along the +z direction at 3.5 GHz, the metasurface produces a well-defined scattered beam with a measured deflection angle of −30° in the azimuthal plane. By implementing appropriate phase gradient modifications through azimuthal angle φ adjustment, the beam direction is effectively steered to +30°, as shown in Figure 11b. Both simulated and experimental radiation patterns demonstrate excellent agreement with the theoretical predictions, confirming the successful implementation of directional beam control functionality. Figure 11c,d further reveals that, under y-polarized wave excitation with identical propagation direction and operating frequency, the metasurface maintains comparable beam-steering capability, achieving symmetric ±30° deflections through proper coding sequence optimization. A comprehensive comparison between the x-polarized and y-polarized excitation cases indicates remarkable polarization insensitivity of the designed structure, with measured radiation patterns showing negligible performance degradation (<1.5 dB sidelobe variation) between orthogonal polarization states. This polarization-independent beam manipulation capability confirms the dual-polarized operation characteristics of the proposed coding metasurface architecture, while maintaining stable beam deflection accuracy within ±1.2° across all tested polarization conditions.
In order to compare the deflection efficiency under simulation and measurement conditions, we used the normalized pattern in linear values for evaluation. Figure 12 shows the power patterns under simulation and measurement conditions. Figure 12a and Figure 12b, respectively, show the simulated and measured beam deflection efficiency at a frequency of 3.5 GHz for an x-polarized incident wave. Under the coding array with an angle range of ±30 degrees, the measured deflection efficiencies are 67.6% and 60.2%, respectively. Figure 12c and Figure 12d show the results for a y-polarized incident wave, and the measured deflection efficiencies are 70.8% and 63.1%, respectively. As illustrated in Figure 12, for both x-polarization and y-polarization, the measured deflection efficiency is lower than the simulation result. This difference may be attributed to factors such as losses in the actual environment, manufacturing errors, or measurement errors. Within the deflection range of ±30°, the deflection efficiency ranges from 60% to 70%, indicating that the coding array can still maintain a relatively high deflection performance at larger angles.
Table 6 compares phased array antennas [24,25], conventional metasurface beamformers [26,27], and the metasurface in this work across several key performance metrics. Regarding hardware complexity, the proposed design employs a compact unit structure composed of only three layers, significantly reducing complexity compared to the sophisticated architecture of phased array antennas [24,25]. Regarding computing complexity, the proposed system is undemanding, contrasting with the intensive computational requirements of conventional metasurface beamformers [26,27]. The power consumption of our system is particularly noteworthy. While phased array antennas demand numerous phase shifters, resulting in high power consumption [24,25], our design utilizes a passive structure, thereby achieving dramatically reduced power requirements. Furthermore, manufacturing costs are maintained at inexpensive levels versus the costly implementation of phased arrays [24,25]. Finally, the angular coverage range is extended to ±51.5°, surpassing the ±30° capability of conventional metasurface beamformers [26,27]. These advantages collectively demonstrate the superior performance and practicality of our ring-shaped metasurface for 5G communication systems.

5. Conclusions

In this work, we have designed and demonstrated an annular unit element coding metasurface operating at 3.5 GHz for advanced beam manipulation in wireless communication systems. The proposed metasurface enables flexible control of electromagnetic waves, supporting both single-beam and dual-beam configurations through optimized encoding sequences. By employing a convolution-based encoding method, multiple phase gradients were realized, achieving anomalous reflection of vertically incident plane waves with seven distinct deflection angles ranging from 51.5° to 17.5°. The metasurface design allows precise beam focusing in targeted areas, significantly enhancing signal reception sensitivity and transmission efficiency. Experimental results validate the design’s capability to improve 5G wireless communication channel performance and address signal blind spots in localized regions. This work provides a promising approach for developing reconfigurable intelligent surfaces in next-generation communication systems, with potential applications in beamforming, coverage extension, and multi-user spatial multiplexing. Future research will focus on expanding the operational bandwidth and integrating active components for real-time beam control.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L.; Methodology, B.W.; Software, J.G.; Resources, Q.X.; Data curation, Y.C.; Writing—original draft, Y.C.; Writing—review & editing, J.W.; Visualization, Y.C.; Project administration, X.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article.

References

  1. ElMossallamy, M.A.; Zhang, H.; Song, L.; Seddik, K.G.; Han, Z.; Li, G.Y. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Wireless Communications: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw. 2020, 6, 990–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tang, W.; Chen, M.Z.; Dai, J.Y.; Zeng, Y.; Zhao, X.; Jin, S.; Cheng, Q.; Cui, T.J. Wireless Communications with Programmable Metasurface: New Paradigms, Opportunities, and Challenges on Transceiver Design. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2020, 27, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, L.; Chen, M.Z.; Tang, W.; Dai, J.Y.; Miao, L.; Zhou, X.Y.; Jin, S.; Cheng, Q.; Cui, T.J. A wireless communication scheme based on space- and frequency-division multiplexing using digital metasurfaces. Nat. Electron. 2021, 4, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Z.; Dai, L. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for 6G: Nine Fundamental Issues and One Critical Problem. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 2023, 28, 929–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wu, Q.; Zhang, S.; Zheng, B.; You, C.; Zhang, R. Intelligent Reflecting Surface-Aided Wireless Communications: A Tutorial. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2021, 69, 3313–3351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Renzo, M.D.; Zappone, A.; Debbah, M.; Alouini, M.S.; Yuen, C.; Rosny, J.d.; Tretyakov, S. Smart Radio Environments Empowered by Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: How It Works, State of Research, and The Road Ahead. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2020, 38, 2450–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cui, T.J.; Qi, M.Q.; Wan, X.; Zhao, J.; Cheng, Q. Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable metamaterials. Light Sci. Appl. 2014, 3, e218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, J.; Yin, X.; Xu, M.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H. Switchable coding metasurface for flexible manipulation of terahertz wave based on Dirac semimetal. Results Phys. 2022, 33, 105204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lan, F.; Wang, L.; Zeng, H.; Liang, S.; Song, T.; Liu, W.; Mazumder, P.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Mittleman, D.M. Real-time programmable metasurface for terahertz multifunctional wave front engineering. Light Sci. Appl. 2023, 12, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dai, J.Y.; Tang, W.K.; Zhao, J.; Li, X.; Cheng, Q.; Ke, J.C.; Chen, M.Z.; Jin, S.; Cui, T.J. Wireless Communications through a Simplified Architecture Based on Time-Domain Digital Coding Metasurface. Adv. Mater. Technol 2019, 4, 1900044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, S.; Cui, T.J.; Zhang, L.; Xu, Q.; Wang, Q.; Wan, X.; Gu, J.Q.; Tang, W.X.; Qing Qi, M.; Han, J.G.; et al. Convolution Operations on Coding Metasurface to Reach Flexible and Continuous Controls of Terahertz Beams. Adv. Sci. 2016, 3, 1600156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zheng, B.; You, C.; Mei, W.; Zhang, R. A Survey on Channel Estimation and Practical Passive Beamforming Design for Intelligent Reflecting Surface Aided Wireless Communications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2022, 24, 1035–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, H.; Xiong, Z.; Zhao, J.; Niyato, D.; Xiao, L.; Wu, Q. Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Intelligent Reflecting Surface for Secure Wireless Communications. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2021, 20, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Khan, H.A.; Rafique, U.; Abbas, S.M.; Ahmed, F.; Huang, Y.; Uqaili, J.A.; Mahmoud, A. Polarization-Independent Ultra Wideband RCS Reduction Conformal Coding Metasurface Based on Integrated Polarization Conversion-Diffusion-Absorption Mechanism. Photonics 2023, 10, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hafeez, S.; Yu, J.; Umrani, F.A.; Huang, Y.; Yun, W.; Ishfaq, M. Dual-Polarization Conversion and Coding Metasurface for Wideband Radar Cross-Section Reduction. Photonics 2024, 11, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dong, G.; Chen, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, A.; Chen, X. Multiple beams direction and power control using passive lossless metasurface by surface waves. Opt. Commun. 2023, 546, 129843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, S.; Sun, H.; Yu, R.; Cui, H.; Ren, J.; Gao, F.; Jin, S.; Xie, H.; Wang, H. Two-bit RIS-Aided communications at 3.5 GHz: Some insights from the measurement results under multiple practical scenes. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2305.11614. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhao, T.; Jing, X.; Tang, X.; Bie, X.; Luo, T.; Gan, H.; He, Y.; Li, C.; Hong, Z. Manipulation of wave scattering by Fourier convolution operations with Pancharatnam-Berry coding metasurface. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2021, 141, 106556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, B. Design of Passive Reconfigurable Coding Metasurface based on Ring Structure. J. Xinjiang Norm. Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed. 2025, 44, 27–35. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yang, F.; Xu, F.; Liu, C.; Yang, X.; Wang, Z.; Wu, J.; Fu, X. Two-dimensional beam steering based on compact programmable coding metasurface. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 11780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, L.; Wu, R.Y.; Bai, G.D.; Wu, H.T.; Ma, Q.; Chen, X.Q.; Cui, T.J. Transmission-reflection-integrated multifunctional coding metasurface for full-space controls of electromagnetic waves. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1802205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, C.; Yang, J.; Yang, L.X.; Ke, J.C.; Chen, M.Z.; Cao, W.K.; Chen, M.; Wu, Z.H.; Chen, J.F.; Cheng, Q. Convolution operations on time-domain digital coding metasurface for beam manipulations of harmonics. Nanophotonics 2020, 9, 2771–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bao, L.; Fu, X.; Wu, R.Y.; Ma, Q.; Cui, T.J. Full-space manipulations of electromagnetic wavefronts at two frequencies by encoding both amplitude and phase of metasurface. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2021, 6, 2001032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Y.; Zhu, L.; Wang, H.; Luo, Y.; Yang, G. A compact, scanning tightly coupled dipole array with parasitic strips for next-generation wireless applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2018, 17, 534–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Alkaraki, S.; Lin, Q.-W.; Kelly, J.R.; Wang, Z.; Wong, H. Phased array antenna system enabled by liquid metal phase shifters. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 96987–97000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xiong, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, X.; Huang, C.; Pu, M.; Luo, J.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Bai, W.; Ye, J. Multi-Channel Wireless Communication Based on Amplitude-Phase Reconfigurable Space-Coding Beamforming Metasurface. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2024, 10, 2400056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ataloglou, V.G.; Eleftheriades, G.V. Synthesis of modulated dielectric metasurfaces for precise antenna beamforming. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2023, 19, 044033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The implementation of functionalities in coding metasurfaces subjected to vertically incident plane waves.
Figure 1. The implementation of functionalities in coding metasurfaces subjected to vertically incident plane waves.
Materials 18 01913 g001
Figure 2. (a) Schematic diagram of the metasurface unit structure; (b) Cross-sectional view of the metasurface unit.
Figure 2. (a) Schematic diagram of the metasurface unit structure; (b) Cross-sectional view of the metasurface unit.
Materials 18 01913 g002
Figure 3. Amplitude and phase response of reflected waves when x- and y-polarized waves are incident along the z-axis (a) reflection amplitude; (b) reflection phase.
Figure 3. Amplitude and phase response of reflected waves when x- and y-polarized waves are incident along the z-axis (a) reflection amplitude; (b) reflection phase.
Materials 18 01913 g003
Figure 4. (a) Reflection amplitudes of the four states “00”, “01”, “10”, and “11” under different incident angles; (b) reflection phases of the four states “00”, “01”, “10”, and “11” under different incident angles.
Figure 4. (a) Reflection amplitudes of the four states “00”, “01”, “10”, and “11” under different incident angles; (b) reflection phases of the four states “00”, “01”, “10”, and “11” under different incident angles.
Materials 18 01913 g004
Figure 5. The simulation results of the four coding arrays, N1, N2, N3, and N4. (a) The radiation pattern and far-field radiation diagram of the N1. (b) The radiation pattern and far-field radiation diagram of the N2. (c) The radiation pattern and far-field radiation diagram of the N3. (d) The radiation pattern and far-field radiation diagram of the N4.
Figure 5. The simulation results of the four coding arrays, N1, N2, N3, and N4. (a) The radiation pattern and far-field radiation diagram of the N1. (b) The radiation pattern and far-field radiation diagram of the N2. (c) The radiation pattern and far-field radiation diagram of the N3. (d) The radiation pattern and far-field radiation diagram of the N4.
Materials 18 01913 g005
Figure 6. Normalized scattering patterns under different codings.
Figure 6. Normalized scattering patterns under different codings.
Materials 18 01913 g006
Figure 7. Far-field scattering patterns and radiation patterns obtained from simulations of the five coding metasurface. (a) Far-field scattering pattern and radiation pattern of the P1. (b) Far-field scattering pattern and radiation pattern of the P2. (c) Far-field scattering pattern and radiation pattern of the P3. (d) Far-field scattering pattern and radiation pattern of the P4. (e) Far-field scattering pattern and radiation pattern of the P5.
Figure 7. Far-field scattering patterns and radiation patterns obtained from simulations of the five coding metasurface. (a) Far-field scattering pattern and radiation pattern of the P1. (b) Far-field scattering pattern and radiation pattern of the P2. (c) Far-field scattering pattern and radiation pattern of the P3. (d) Far-field scattering pattern and radiation pattern of the P4. (e) Far-field scattering pattern and radiation pattern of the P5.
Materials 18 01913 g007aMaterials 18 01913 g007b
Figure 8. Schematic diagram of the convolution process of the coding metasurface under vertical incidence of a plane wave at 3.5 GHz. (ac) Phase distribution diagrams of P1, P5, and A3. (df) Far-field radiation patterns.
Figure 8. Schematic diagram of the convolution process of the coding metasurface under vertical incidence of a plane wave at 3.5 GHz. (ac) Phase distribution diagrams of P1, P5, and A3. (df) Far-field radiation patterns.
Materials 18 01913 g008
Figure 9. Radiation patterns under different polarization incidences. (a) Theta = −30°, Phi = 0°. (b) Theta = 30°, Phi = 180°.
Figure 9. Radiation patterns under different polarization incidences. (a) Theta = −30°, Phi = 0°. (b) Theta = 30°, Phi = 180°.
Materials 18 01913 g009
Figure 10. (a) Schematic diagram of the encoded metasurface sample. (b) Microwave anechoic chamber test environment.
Figure 10. (a) Schematic diagram of the encoded metasurface sample. (b) Microwave anechoic chamber test environment.
Materials 18 01913 g010
Figure 11. Comparison between measured and simulated results: (a,b) Far-field radiation patterns under x-polarized incident wave excitation with reflection angles of −30° (Phi = 0°) and 30° (Phi = 180°); (c,d) Far-field radiation patterns under y-polarized incident wave excitation with reflection angles of −30° (Phi = 0°) and 30° (Phi = 180°).
Figure 11. Comparison between measured and simulated results: (a,b) Far-field radiation patterns under x-polarized incident wave excitation with reflection angles of −30° (Phi = 0°) and 30° (Phi = 180°); (c,d) Far-field radiation patterns under y-polarized incident wave excitation with reflection angles of −30° (Phi = 0°) and 30° (Phi = 180°).
Materials 18 01913 g011
Figure 12. The simulated and measured power patterns in linear scale at 3.5 GHz. (a,b) X-polarized incident wave with reflection angles of ±30°. (c,d) Y-polarized incident wave with reflection angles of ±30°.
Figure 12. The simulated and measured power patterns in linear scale at 3.5 GHz. (a,b) X-polarized incident wave with reflection angles of ±30°. (c,d) Y-polarized incident wave with reflection angles of ±30°.
Materials 18 01913 g012
Table 1. Schematic diagrams of 1-bit and 2-bit coding unit cells.
Table 1. Schematic diagrams of 1-bit and 2-bit coding unit cells.
a/(mm)w/(mm)phase/(°)1-bit Phase Coding2-bit Phase Coding
21.59.680000
18.84.8590---01
17.54.46180110
15.33.9271---11
Table 2. Coding sequences for specific angles.
Table 2. Coding sequences for specific angles.
Sequence NameCoding SequenceΓ (mm) θ (°)
N10001110001110001110012941.6
N20000111100001111000017229.9
N30000001111110000001125819.4
N40000000000011111111147310.4
Table 3. Period Γ and elevation angle θ of different 2-bit coding sequences.
Table 3. Period Γ and elevation angle θ of different 2-bit coding sequences.
Sequence NameCoding SequenceΓ (mm) θ (°)
P10011223300112233001117229.9
P20001112223330001112225819.4
P30000111122223333000034414.4
P40000011111222223333343011.5
P5000000111111222222335169.6
Table 4. Reflection angles and main lobe reflection intensities under different arrangement methods.
Table 4. Reflection angles and main lobe reflection intensities under different arrangement methods.
A × B = COne-Dimensional Radiation PatternFar-Field Radiation Pattern
(a)P2 + P3 + P4 = A1Materials 18 01913 i001Materials 18 01913 i002
(b)P1 + P3 = A2Materials 18 01913 i003Materials 18 01913 i004
(c)P1 + P5 = A3Materials 18 01913 i005Materials 18 01913 i006
(d)P1 + P2 − P4 = A4Materials 18 01913 i007Materials 18 01913 i008
(e)P2 + P3 = A5Materials 18 01913 i009Materials 18 01913 i010
(f)P3 + P5 = A6Materials 18 01913 i011Materials 18 01913 i012
(g)P1 − P4 = A7Materials 18 01913 i013Materials 18 01913 i014
Table 5. Comparison between this work and previous studies.
Table 5. Comparison between this work and previous studies.
Ref.[11][17][21][22][23][20]This Work
Frequency1 THz3.5 GHz15 GHz10 GHz7.17 GHz28 GHz3.5 GHz
Polarization SingleSingleDualSingleSingleSingleDual
Maximum θ (°)63.2°30°18.2°48.59°28°45°51.5°
Experimental θ (°)41.5°30°18.2°22.2°28°30°30°
Half-power beam width---------10.7°6.3°
Number of beams12 1 4 1 1 1
Bandwidth0.01 THz300 MHz40 MHz400 MHz100 MHz50 MHz214 MHz
Table 6. Comparison of key indicators among this work, phased array antennas, and conventional metasurface beamformers.
Table 6. Comparison of key indicators among this work, phased array antennas, and conventional metasurface beamformers.
Ref.Hardware ComplexityComputing ComplexityPower ConsumptionManufacturing CostAngular Coverage Range
[24]sophisticatedintensivehighcostly±45°
[25]sophisticatedintensivehighcostly±38°
[26]sophisticatedintensivelowinexpensive22.5°
[27]sophisticatedintensivelowinexpensive±30°
This workuncomplicatedundemandinglowinexpensive±51.5°
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, B.; Liu, X.; Gao, J.; Xue, Q.; Huang, X. A Convolution-Based Coding Metasurface for Wide-Angle Beam Steering for Enhanced 5G Wireless Communications. Materials 2025, 18, 1913. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18091913

AMA Style

Wang J, Chen Y, Wang B, Liu X, Gao J, Xue Q, Huang X. A Convolution-Based Coding Metasurface for Wide-Angle Beam Steering for Enhanced 5G Wireless Communications. Materials. 2025; 18(9):1913. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18091913

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jing, Yan Chen, Benxian Wang, Xin Liu, Junfei Gao, Qi Xue, and Xiaojun Huang. 2025. "A Convolution-Based Coding Metasurface for Wide-Angle Beam Steering for Enhanced 5G Wireless Communications" Materials 18, no. 9: 1913. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18091913

APA Style

Wang, J., Chen, Y., Wang, B., Liu, X., Gao, J., Xue, Q., & Huang, X. (2025). A Convolution-Based Coding Metasurface for Wide-Angle Beam Steering for Enhanced 5G Wireless Communications. Materials, 18(9), 1913. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18091913

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop