Next Article in Journal
Bismuth–Titanium–Silicate–Oxide Glass Ceramics for Various Dielectric Applications
Previous Article in Journal
First Full-Scale 2D Field Experiment on Semi-Embedded Rubber Column Metamaterials: Enhanced Attenuation of Love Waves and Mechanistic Insights
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effortless Fabrication of Nanofused HKUST-1 for Enhanced Catalytic Efficiency in the Cyanosilylation of Aldehyd
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Porous Metals: Preparation, Microstructure, Properties and Performance

School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China
Materials 2025, 18(24), 5518; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18245518
Submission received: 25 November 2025 / Accepted: 5 December 2025 / Published: 8 December 2025
Porous metals are a special class of composite materials, consisting of a metal phase and a gaseous phase. Porous metals are also known as metal foams and cellular metals, although these have different connotations. Porous metal is a general term referring to any solid metal containing internal pores, no matter whether they are closed or open, or regularly or irregularly distributed. Metal foam is a type of porous metal manufactured by a foaming process, either by injecting gas into or generating gas in the liquid metal, and generally has closed pores. Cellular metal emphasizes the cell-based pore structure, often with a regular pattern. In practice, however, the boundaries between these terms are blurred and they are often used interchangeably.
Rapid developments have been made in the field of porous metals in the past three decades. A number of introductory books and review articles on the manufacture, properties, and applications are available in the literature [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14].
The functionality of porous metals is derived from the combinations of two distinct materials, metal and air. Porous metals are finding applications in many sectors, such as aerospace, automotive, construction, and energy, due to their unique properties. The applications of porous metals can largely be categorized into two classes: mechanical energy absorption due to their ability for a large amount of plastic deformation, and non-mechanical functions such as filtering, heat dissipation, electromagnetic shielding, sound absorption, etc. Many studies have consequently been conducted on mechanical [7,8,9,12,15,16,17,18,19] and non-mechanical [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31] properties. The properties of porous metals are not only dependent upon the metal matrix, but are particularly sensitive to the nature of the porous structure, characterized by the shape, size, quantity, and connectivity of the pores.
The porous structure is closely related to the technology used to produce the porous metals. A variety of techniques have been used to manufacture porous metals, including foaming, casting, sintering, and 3D printing [6,10,11,13,14,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. A useful way to understand the performance of porous metals produced by these different technologies is to look into the specific as-produced porous structures and to examine how the structures affect their properties.
This Special Issue, “Porous Metals: Preparation, Microstructure, Properties and Performance”, presents a collection of ten publications. They give a snapshot of recent advances in the manufacturing and characterization of porous metals. They cover several typical metals and their alloys, including Al [40,41,42], Cu [43], Ti [44,45,46], Fe-Ni [47], and metal–organic framework (MOF) [48]. A range of manufacturing methods have been employed, including foaming [40,42], sintering [44,45,46], space holder [41,43,49], template electroplating [47], and hydrothermal synthesis [48]. While most studies [40,42,43,45,46,47] focus on mechanical properties, non-mechanical properties, such as surface area [48], capillary effect [41], and fluid flow and heat transfer [49], are also investigated.
This Editorial summarizes the main findings reported in the ten publications in this Special Issue. It is not intended to give comprehensive coverage of all the key points. Instead, only the special or unique features, which may be of particular interest to the readers, are given an introduction or discussion.
Kertesz & Kovacs [40] investigated the energy-absorbing capacity of a closed-cell aluminum foam manufactured by a foaming process using Al powder as the raw material and TiH2 as the foaming agent. The main aim of the investigation is to study the role played by friction caused by the confining tube wall, through free and constrained compression tests. They found that confinement inhibited cell deformation and friction between the foam and the tube wall consumed about 20% of the compressive energy. Chu et al. [42] tackled the low-thermal conductivity problem of Al foams manufactured via foaming processes. Poor thermal conductivity leads to large-sized Al alloy foams being difficult to be homogeneously strengthened by long-time age hardening. They adopted the Al-0.16Sc-0.17Zr alloy and demonstrated that this alloy can be subjected to prolonged aging because the Al3(Sc, Zr, Ti) phase has a core–shell structure and the precipitates are less prone to coarsening.
Olmos et al. [45] manufactured porous Ti6Al4V materials by extrusion 3D printing plus sintering. They produced precursor filaments by extrusion of Ti6Al4V powder with polymer additives and printed samples with open channels by filament building up, followed by sintering. The as-produced porous structures have two types of porosity: the open channels and the fine inter-particle porosity in the struts. The two-scaled porosity is considered beneficial to bone implant applications. Villa-Tapia et al. [46] manufactured porous Ti6Al4V alloy compacts by sintering first and then infiltrated liquid Ag into the compacts to produce Ti6Al4V/Ag composites, which have potential as antibacterial materials for biomedical use. Yang et al. [44] manufactured porous Ti by sintering Ti powder in a molten MgCl2/Mg bath and reported that Mg promoted the aggregation and densification of the Ti particles, due to good wettability between Mg and Ti, and enhanced precipitation of dissolved titanium atoms from molten Mg.
Xiao et al. [43] investigated the mechanical properties of porous Cu manufactured by the space holder method. They studied two types of porous structures, created by two space holder particle shapes, with a wide porosity range. They confirmed that pore shape has a significant effect on the mechanical properties. Although the elastic modulus and yield strength follow the empirical power law with relative density, different pore shapes give different power law constants. Shen et al. [41] studied the capillary effect of porous aluminum wicks manufactured by the space holder method. They created a bi-porous structure using two different-sized NaCl powders. They showed that an optimized combination of large and small pores can generate a higher capillary pressure than the mono-porous structure with the same porosity. Lu et al. [49] conducted a numerical study on fluid flow and heat transfer of porous media manufactured by the space holder method. They investigated the effects of pore size, porosity, and flow velocity on the pressure drop, permeability, form drag coefficient, and heat transfer coefficient, and showed good agreements with existing experimental results. It is worth noting that their results showed that, at high velocity, only the metal foam close to the heat source contributes to heat dissipation. It is a good example of showing the benefits of numerical modeling in saving resources. Both studies [41,49] provided some useful information for heat exchanger applications of this type of porous metal.
Zhang et al. [47] investigated the energy absorption characteristics of fiber–foam sandwich structures subjected to gas explosion. The sandwich structures consisted of iron–nickel foam being used as the front and rear panels, and fiber materials (carbon, aramid, and glass) functioning as the core layer. They reported that the combination of rigid metal foam plates and a flexible fiber layer improved the energy absorption performance. However, no quantitative information on their relative contributions is elaborated.
Zhao [48] manufactured nanofused MOFs based on copper and trimesate through a low-temperature hydrothermal method. The as-fabricated MOFs have specific surface area (BET) as high as 1220 m2·g−1, and demonstrated markedly improved catalytic performance in the cyanosilylation of aldehydes.
In reviewing these papers in this Special Issue, it is easy to conclude that the scope of research in the field of porous metals is constantly expanding. The porous metals community constantly endeavor to develop new manufacturing technologies, produce new materials, create new structures, identify new properties, and find new applications. The field has many exciting research topics to offer.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gibson, L.J.; Ashby, M.F. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashby, M.F.; Evans, T.; Fleck, N.A.; Hutchinson, J.W.; Wadley, H.N.G.; Gibson, L.J. Metal Foams: A Design Guide, 1st ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  3. Degischer, H.P.; Kriszt, B. (Eds.) Handbook of Cellular Metals: Production, Processing, Applications; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  4. Banhart, J. Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2001, 46, 559–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Banhart, J. Light-metal foams—History of innovation and technological challenges. Adv. Eng. Mat. 2013, 15, 82–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kulshreshtha, A.; Dhakad, S.K. Preparation of metal foam by different methods: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 26, 1784–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, B.; Gain, A.K.; Ding, W.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Fu, Y. A review on metallic porous materials: Pore formation, mechanical properties, and their applications. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 95, 2641–2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nisa, S.U.; Pandey, S.; Pandey, P. A review of the compressive properties of closed-cell aluminum metal foams. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. E J. Process Mech. Eng. 2022, 237, 441–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kalpakoglou, T.; Yiatros, S. Metal foams: A review for mechanical properties under tensile and shear stress. Front. Mater. 2022, 9, 998673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Madgule, M.; Sreenivasa, C.G.; Borgaonkar, A.V. Aluminium metal foam production methods, properties and applications—A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 77, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, L.; Yang, H.; Chen, X.; Tang, W.; Huang, X.; Liu, Z. The development of porous metallic materials: A short review of fabrication, characteristics, and applications. Phys. Scr. 2023, 98, 122001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, D.; Gao, K.; Yang, J.; Zhang, L. Functionally graded porous structures: Analyses, performances, and applications—A Review. Thin-Walled Struct. 2023, 191, 111046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hassan, A.; Alnaser, I.A. A Review of different manufacturing methods of metallic foams. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 6280–6295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fu, W.; Li, Y. Fabrication, Processing, properties, and applications of closed-cell aluminum foams: A review. Materials 2024, 17, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Andrews, E.; Sanders, W.; Gibson, L.J. Compressive and tensile behaviour of aluminum foams. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1998, 270, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. McCullough, K.Y.G.; Fleck, N.A.; Ashby, M.F. Uniaxial stress–strain behaviour of aluminium alloy foams. Acta Mater. 1999, 47, 2323–2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. McCullough, K.Y.G.; Fleck, N.A.; Ashby, M.F. Toughness of aluminium alloy foams. Acta Mater. 1999, 47, 2331–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Amsterdam, E.; De Hosson, J.T.M.; Onck, P.R. Failure mechanisms of closed-cell aluminum foam under monotonic and cyclic loading. Acta Mater. 2006, 54, 4465–4472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gong, S.; Li, Z.; Zhao, Y.Y. An extended Mori–Tanaka model for the elastic moduli of porous materials of finite size. Acta Mater. 2011, 59, 6820–6830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Han, F.S.; Seiffert, G.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Gibbs, B. Acoustic absorption behaviour of an open-celled aluminium foam. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2003, 36, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, X.; Peyton, A.J.; Zhao, Y.Y. Eddy current measurements of the electrical conductivity and magnetic permeability of porous metals. NDT E Int. 2006, 39, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, B.; Chen, T.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, J. Numerical and analytical solutions for sound propagation and absorption in porous media at high sound pressure levels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2012, 132, 1436–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xiao, Z.; Zhao, Y. Heat transfer coefficient of porous copper with homogeneous and hybrid structures in active cooling. J. Mater. Res. 2013, 28, 2545–2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Diao, K.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, Y. Measurement of tortuosity of porous Cu using a diffusion diaphragm cell. Measurement 2017, 110, 335–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhu, P.; Zhao, Y. Effects of electrochemical reaction and surface morphology on electroactive surface area of porous copper manufactured by Lost Carbonate Sintering. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 26392–26400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lu, X.; Zhao, Y. Effect of flow regime on convective heat transfer in porous copper manufactured by lost carbonate sintering. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 2019, 80, 108482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhu, P.; Zhao, Y. Cyclic voltammetry measurements of electroactive surface area of porous nickel: Peak current and peak charge methods and diffusion layer effect. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 233, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aramesh, M.; Shabani, B. Metal foams application to enhance the thermal performance of phase change materials: A review of experimental studies to understand the mechanisms. J. Energy Storage 2022, 50, 104650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Z.; Zhao, Y. Porous nickel electrode for highly sensitive non-enzyme electrochemical glucose detection. Coatings 2023, 13, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, Z.; Zhao, Y. Effects of processing conditions and fine powder loading on real and electroactive surface areas of porous nickel manufactured by lost carbonate sintering. Powder Metall. 2023, 66, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Liu, R.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, L.; Jiang, J.; Liu, E.; Xu, F. Metal foams for the interfering energy conversion: Electromagnetic wave absorption, shielding, and sound attenuation. J. Mater. Sci. Tech. 2025, 215, 258–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Singh, S.; Bhatnagar, N. A survey of fabrication and application of metallic foams (1925–2017). J. Porous Mat. 2017, 25, 537–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, Y.Y.; Sun, D.X. A novel sintering-dissolution process for manufacturing Al foams. Scr. Mater. 2001, 44, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhao, Y.Y.; Fung, T.; Zhang, L.P.; Zhang, F.L. Lost carbonate sintering process for manufacturing metal foams. Scr. Mater. 2005, 52, 295–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhu, P.; Wu, Z.; Zhao, Y. Hierarchical porous Cu with high surface area and fluid permeability. Scr. Mater. 2019, 172, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, L.Y.; Liang, S.X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.C. Additive manufacturing of metallic lattice structures: Unconstrained design, accurate fabrication, fascinated performances, and challenges. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2021, 146, 100648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rodriguez-Contreras, A.; Punset, M.; Calero, J.A.; Gil, F.J.; Ruperez, E.; Manero, J.M. Powder metallurgy with space holder for porous titanium implants: A review. J. Mat. Sci. Technol. 2021, 76, 129–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kumar, N.; Bharti, A.; Prasad, D. Analysis of production techniques for metal foams of iron and steel. Powder Metall. Metal Ceram. 2022, 61, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Changdar, A.; Chakraborty, S.S.; Li, Y.; Wen, C. Laser additive manufacturing of aluminum-based stochastic and nonstochastic cellular materials. J. Mater. Sci. Tech. 2024, 183, 89–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kertesz, J.; Kovacs, T.A. Friction investigation of closed-cell aluminium foam during radial-constrained test. Materials 2024, 17, 3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shen, H.; Suzuki, A.; Takata, N.; Kobashi, M. Enhancing capillary pressure of porous aluminum wicks by controlling bi-porous structure using different-sized nacl space holders. Materials 2024, 17, 4729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chu, X.; Wang, T.; Yang, D.; Peng, X.; Hou, S.; Chen, S.; Lu, G.; Jiao, M.; Wu, Y.; Rempel, A.A.; et al. Homogeneous age-hardening of large-sized Al-Sc foams via micro-alloying with Zr and Ti. Materials 2024, 17, 1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xiao, J.; He, Y.; Ma, W.; Yue, Y.; Qiu, G. Effects of the Space holder shape on the pore structure and mechanical properties of porous Cu with a wide porosity range. Materials 2024, 17, 3008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, X.; Li, K.; Li, J.; Sheng, Z.; Liu, Y. Aggregation–growth and densification behavior of titanium particles in molten Mg-MgCl2 system. Materials 2024, 17, 2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Olmos, L.; González-Pedraza, A.S.; Vergara-Hernández, H.J.; Bouvard, D.; López-Cornejo, M.S.; Servín-Castañeda, R. Development of tailored porous Ti6Al4V Materials by extrusion 3d printing. Materials 2025, 18, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Villa-Tapia, J.I.; Vergara-Hernández, H.J.; Olmos, L.; Arteaga, D.; Téllez-Martínez, J.S.; Solorio-García, V.M.; Mihalcea, E. Investigation of Pore size effect on the infiltration process of Ti6Al4V/xAg metal matrix composites. Materials 2025, 18, 939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, B.; Tao, J.; Cui, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Han, Y.; Sun, M. Energy absorption characteristics of composite material with fiber–foam metal sandwich structure subjected to gas explosion. Materials 2024, 17, 1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhao, T. Effortless fabrication of nanofused HKUST-1 for Enhanced catalytic efficiency in the cyanosilylation of aldehyd. Materials 2025, 18, 1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, M. Numerical study on fluid flow behavior and heat transfer performance of porous media manufactured by a space holder method. Materials 2024, 17, 2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Y. Porous Metals: Preparation, Microstructure, Properties and Performance. Materials 2025, 18, 5518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18245518

AMA Style

Zhao Y. Porous Metals: Preparation, Microstructure, Properties and Performance. Materials. 2025; 18(24):5518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18245518

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Yuyuan. 2025. "Porous Metals: Preparation, Microstructure, Properties and Performance" Materials 18, no. 24: 5518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18245518

APA Style

Zhao, Y. (2025). Porous Metals: Preparation, Microstructure, Properties and Performance. Materials, 18(24), 5518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18245518

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop