Next Article in Journal
An Investigation of the Usability of Alkali-Activated Blast Furnace Slag-Additive Construction Demolition Waste as Filling Material
Next Article in Special Issue
Non-Invasive Raman and XRF Study of Mīnā’ī Decoration, the First Sophisticated Painted Enamels
Previous Article in Journal
Deformation Behavior of Inconel 625 Alloy with TPMS Structure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Innovative Approaches on the Estimation of the Effective Permittivity of Fibrous Media
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spectroscopic and Morphological Examination of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) Obtained by Glycine Nitrate Procedure

1
“Vinča” Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Mike Petrovića Alasa 12-14, 11351 Belgrade, Serbia
2
Faculty of Mining and Geology, University of Belgrade, Đušina 7, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
3
Department of Bromatology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
4
IME Process Metallurgy and Metal Recycling, RWTH Aachen University, Intzestrasse 3, 520056 Aachen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(2), 397; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020397
Submission received: 3 December 2024 / Revised: 12 January 2025 / Accepted: 14 January 2025 / Published: 16 January 2025

Abstract

:
The glycine nitrate procedure (GNP) is a method that proved to be the easiest and most effective method for controlling the composition and morphology during the synthesis of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd). This method of the combustion process achieves control of stoichiometry, homogeneity, and purity. Metal nitrates and glycine were mixed in the appropriate stoichiometric ratios to produce Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd). The samples obtained by the mentioned method were further subjected to different characterization methods such as differential thermal analyses (DTA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectrum (FTIR), spectroscopy, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and nitrogen adsorption method. A high level of anisotropy of the shape and size of particles in the form of agglomerates was found. Also, there are noticeable differences in the microstructure and plate crystals. The color of the synthesized sample changes from darker to lighter shades after thermal treatments. There are pronounced changes in the dominant wavelength (nm) and color purity between the initial sample and the sample after heating (1100 °C) due to the concentration of Co.

1. Introduction

Molybdenia-based ceramic materials have emerged as a significant subject of interest in fundamental research and practical applications. Their unique properties, such as high thermal stability, excellent electrical conductivity, and remarkable mechanical strength, contribute to their appeal [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. These materials are being explored for a wide range of applications, including photoluminescence, which can produce light in response to excitation, and magnetism, which exhibits unique magnetic properties useful in various technologies [1,2,3,4,9,10,11]. Additionally, their roles in catalysis make them valuable for accelerating chemical reactions in industrial processes [5,6,7]. Furthermore, their potential applications in batteries highlight their ability to enhance energy storage and conversion systems, while their conductivity supports advancements in electrical applications [9]. Molybdenum-based ceramics demonstrate significant versatility and innovative potential, making them a critical focus in materials science. Compounds like CoMoO4 and other metal molybdates have been extensively studied for their natural abundance, low cost, and non-toxicity [12,13,14]. In addition to CoMoO4 showing improved electrochemical properties applied for the manufacture of supercapacitor electrodes, these molybdates found applications in industry, chemistry, electrochemistry, health, energy [15,16,17,18,19,20], and photocatalysts for wastewater treatment and are used in the manufacture of colorants for a larger area of materials (concretes, plasters, paints, soaps, cosmetics, ceramics, glasses…) [21].
Molybdate-based materials have been recognized for their exceptional qualities as host matrices for rare earth ions, demonstrating commendable thermal and chemical stability [22]. Replacing M2+/M3+ (metal cations) in host materials with rare earth elements has the potential to enhance device stability. Rare earth elements in their trivalent states demonstrate impressive stability over a broad temperature range, providing significant thermal and chemical resilience. By strategically varying the concentration of dopants, we can effectively engineer defects within the crystal structure. This can be accomplished through ion substitution, charge compensation, and introducing oxygen vacancies [22,23,24]. These innovations can potentially enhance the electrochemical properties of the materials, paving the way for more effective applications. For instance, holmium, recognized for having the highest magnetic moment among the lanthanides, and gadolinium, which offers unique metallurgical properties and resistance to high temperatures and oxidation, are noteworthy candidates. Additionally, ytterbium stands out due to its paramagnetic characteristics at temperatures above 1K, making it an interesting option. Exploring these elements may lead to advancements in material performance and application.
The study and development of thermochromism and thermochromic materials hold immense potential, driving innovation across diverse fields such as energy-efficient building design, textile industries, thermal storage, antique preservation, and sensory technology [25]. Thermochromic materials exhibit a reversible color change in response to temperature variations, although there are instances where the changes may be irreversible. This change occurs at a specific temperature, referred to as the thermochromic transition. It can be defined by an observable color change induced by a shift in molecular conformations due to a temperature change, which can be thoughtfully modified by incorporating doping agents into the material, unlocking endless possibilities for creativity and innovation. Various materials exhibit different responses to specific stimuli; nonetheless, the mechanism underlying these color changes generally involves a reversible transfer of electrons or ions. This process requires energy from an external source to overcome potential barriers effectively [26,27]. This study explores the thermochromic potential of cobalt molybdate by incorporating Ho, Yb, or Gd as a dopant. While various cobalt molybdates have been investigated, there appears to be a lack of literature regarding nanoscale CoMoO4 doped with trace amounts of rare earth elements such as the investigated ones presented in this manuscript. Previous research has involved rare earth doping in systems of Cd and Ca [22,28,29]; however, these studies do not pertain to the novel Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) nanopowders. This work emphasizes the novelty of using the glycine nitrate process (GNP) [30] to synthesize nanoparticles to advance research in this domain. The primary objective is to synthesize nanostructured solid solutions of the specified composition and analyze their spectroscopic and morphological properties using various experimental techniques, thereby providing new insights into the nature and characteristics of these materials.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Powder Preparation

In order to have better control over the stoichiometry, structure, and phase purity of metal oxides, the concept of avoiding the brute force method is still resorted to during the synthesis of new materials. When applying the glycine nitrate method, it is important to prioritize the molar ratio of glycine to nitrate ions in the mixture. A higher reaction temperature (exothermicity) will undoubtedly lead to larger crystallite sizes in the final material, which means that the starting reactants will react more effectively. Focusing on these factors is essential for achieving optimal results. Starting chemicals used for the GNP (glycine nitrate procedure) synthesis of powders were aminoacetic acid–glycine NH2CH2COOH (Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), Co-nitrate Co(NO3)2 · 6H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, A Part of Merck, KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Ho-nitrate Ho(NO3)3 · 5H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, A Part of Merck, KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Yb-nitrate Yb(NO3)3 · 5H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, A Part of Merck, KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Gd-nitrate Gd(NO3)3 · 6H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, A Part of Merck, KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and ammonium molybdate (NH4)6Mo7O24 · 4H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, A Part of Merck, KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), all >99.9% purity. The principle of propellant chemistry [31] was used to calculate the composition of the reacting mixtures. According to the established principles of propellant chemistry, it is essential to recognize that in stoichiometric redox reactions between a fuel and an oxidizer, the ratio of the net oxidizing valences of the metal nitrate to the net reducing valences of the fuel must be uniquely defined. This insight is crucial for advancing our understanding and applications in this specialized field. By convention, the valencies of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen, cobalt, holmium, ytterbium, gadolinium, and molybdenum are set as 4+, 0, 2–, 1+, 2+, 3+, 3+, 3+ and 6+, respectively. Using the valencies of these individual elements, the reducing valence of glycine C2H5NO2 = 2(+4) + 5(+1) + 0 + 2(−2) = 9; it works out to be 9+, while the net oxidizing valencies of Co(NO3)2 and (NH4)6Mo7O24 work out to be 10– and 18+, respectively. Ho(NO3)3, Yb(NO3)3 and Gd(NO3)3 work out to be 15–, respectively. We add these values based on Equations (1)–(3) and divide by 9 (the value for glycine). For producing one mole of Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4, Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4, and Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4, through the stoichiometric reactions (1), (2), and (3), there will be −7.93/9 = 0.88 moles of glycine, which is required. According to the chemical equations, Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) powders were prepared:
C2H5NO2 + 0.9Co(NO3)2 · 6H2O + 0.1Ho(NO3)2 · 5H2O + 0.14(NH4)6Mo7O24 · 4H2O + 2.2O2
Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4+ CH3COOH + 3.96NO2↑ + 8.69H2O
C2H5NO2 + 0.9Co(NO3)2 · 6H2O + 0.1Yb(NO3)2 · 5H2O + 0.14(NH4)6Mo7O24 · 4H2O + 2.2O2
Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4+ CH3COOH + 3.96NO2↑ + 8.69H2O
C2H5NO2 + 0.9Co(NO3)2 · 6H2O + 0.1Gd(NO3)2 · 6H2O + 0.14(NH4)6Mo7O24 · 4H2O + 2.2O2
Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4+ CH3COOH + 3.96NO2↑ + 8.74H2O
The samples were obtained based on the calculations according to the principle of propellant chemistry and the reaction model presented by Equations (1)–(3).
According to the previously calculated composition of the final powder, the synthesis was carried out in a stainless-steel reactor in which all reactants dissolved in distilled water were added. When the reactants are dissolved in water, the reaction starts initially in this heterogeneous medium at the interface [32]. The reaction begins spontaneously at 180 °C. The reactants are heated to 500 °C because, at this temperature, gas evolution ceases, indicating the reaction’s completion. During the reaction, the loss of powders was small, and the amount of powders obtained was very close to the calculated value. The obtained powders were further calcined for 15 min at temperatures of 450 and 1100 °C.

2.2. Sample Characterization

Thermal properties have been investigated by a differential thermal analyses furnace, A.D.A.M.E.L., equipped with Pt-PtRh thermocouples and a digital data acquisition computer system. The t and Δt voltages were collected over a 16-bit USB-2523 AD converter with a 1 Hz sampling rate. The heating rate was 8 °C/min in a temperature range from room temperature to 1100 °C. The reference material used was α-Al2O3, according to which the baseline was corrected.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples were recorded at room temperature by X-ray diffractometer Rigaku Ultima IV equipped with CuKα1,2 radiations using a generator voltage (40.0 kV) and a generator current (40.0 mA). The range of 10–80° 2θ was used for all powders in a continuous scan mode with a scanning step size of 0.02° and at a scan rate of 10°/min, using the D/TeX Ultra-high-speed detector. A glass sample carrier for sample preparation was used. The PDXL2 (Ver. 2.8.4.0) software was used to evaluate the phase composition and identification [33]. All obtained powders were identified using the ICDD database [34] and the ICSD database [35]. Structural analysis was carried out by using the program PowderCell 2.4 [36,37]. The TCH pseudo-Voigt profile function gave the best fit to the experimental data.
Fourier transform infrared spectrum (FTIR) spectra of the prepared and calcinated samples were performed with FTIR BOMEM (Hartmann and Braun). KBr pellets were made for all the powders. The spectra were recorded in the region 4000–400 cm−1 with a resolution of 2 cm−1.
The dominant color wavelength (nm) of the dry-pressed, raw powder sample before and after firing at 1100 °C was measured using a CCS200 spectrometer (Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA), equipped with diffuse reflectance apparatus, in the spectral range 400–700 nm using BaSO4 as a blank. Optical fiber guided light from the lamp to a planoconvex lens, which focused the emitted light to a spot size of around 2 mm in diameter on the sample’s surface. Investigations were made at room temperature, and the mean value of three measurements was represented as the final result. Color investigations were carried out according to the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (1932) [38]. Using the freeware Radiant Imaging Color Calculator program, the chromaticity coordinates were expressed on a 2D chromaticity CIE color diagram [39].
The morphology of samples was estimated from Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) micrographs (FEI Scios 2, operating voltage of 30 kV). The chemical composition of samples was examined by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).
The specific surface and pore size distribution were studied by the low-temperature nitrogen (N2) adsorption–desorption isotherm tests according to the Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) method using a surfer gas adsorption porosimeter (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The specific surface area, SBET, pore size distribution, dV(r), mesopore including external surface area, Smeso, and specific micropore volume, Vmic, for the sample were calculated from the full adsorption/desorption isotherm. Pore size distribution dV(r) was calculated from the desorption isotherm branch by applying the Barrett, Joyner, and Halenda (BJH) method [40], while a mesopore surface and micropore volume were estimated using the t-plot method [41].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Differential Thermal Analyses (DTA)

Investigated samples have shown several reactions occurring at different temperature ranges: between 60 and 170 °C, 250 and 450 °C, and above 650 °C, with notable bands around 760 °C, 890 °C, and between 900 and 1000 °C (Figure 1). To determine the positions of these reactions, Gaussian peak functions from OriginPro 8.5 were applied. The results showed the band intensities, particularly in samples doped with Ho (Figure 1b). and Yb (Figure 1d), revealed a strongly exothermic reaction that created a broad peak between 250 and 450 °C, suggesting the possibility of additional reactions. The sample doped with Gd was also investigated using the same peak functions; however, due to the narrowness of the band, it did not display any additional peaks. The first transformation begins with endothermic reactions indicating the removal of crystallization water from cobalt oxide, occurring between 45 and 170 °C. These reversible reactions signify water loss from the powder mixture [30,40,42]. The first decomposition phase of Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 starts with an endothermic reaction at 129 °C, followed by another endothermic reaction at 174 °C, and then a rapid exothermic reaction peaking at 375 °C (Figure 1a,b). This indicates the start of the second phase, where NO3 and glycine begin to evolve simultaneously [30]. For the second sample, Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4, the first phase transformation starts with endothermic water loss reactions at 61 °C, followed by another endothermic reaction at 132 °C, which is succeeded by a rapid exothermic reaction at 264 °C (Figure 1c,d). The third sample, Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4, exhibited several endothermic reactions similar to the previously discussed ones, with endothermic reactions at 45 °C and 130 °C, indicating the loss of water molecules (Figure 1e). It was observed that the sample doped with Ho exhibited greater water loss, as noted in higher band intensity, compared to those doped with Gd and Yb, which showed similar levels of loss when compared to each other. Like the previous, the samples doped with Ho and Yb exhibited a rapid exothermic reaction at 405 °C, marking the initiation of the second stage with the simultaneous release of NO3− and glycine. The exothermic band observed between 260 and 410 °C indicates the formation of a stable compound due to increased heat and corresponds to the complete breakdown of the initial mixture, resulting in a strong combustion reaction and total loss of coordination water [30,42,43]. There is no visible endothermic band at the 250 °C mark, which has been reported to coincide with the complete decomposition of glycine [44]. Similar reactions were reported by Lai et al. [45] during the low-temperature synthesis of LiNi1-xCoxVO4. Furthermore, the broad peak observed between 325 and 450 °C in the sample doped with Ho suggests not only the crystallization of the β-CoMoO4 phase but also the oxidation of residual carbon from glycine [30,43,46,47]. The endothermic bands between 670 and 890 °C could indicate a possible transition to α-CoMoO4. The endothermic peak at 770 °C, along with a shoulder at 820 °C, indicates the melting of MoO3, which decomposes at around 790 °C [48,49]. The third transformation stage exhibits a strong endothermic reaction between 900 and 1000 °C, possibly suggesting a transition from the β phase to the α phase [30,43]. The sample doped with Ho shows a significantly lower intensity of the band corresponding to this third transformation when compared to the other samples.

3.2. XRD Analysis

The XRD patterns of the Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4, Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4, and Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4 powders were obtained after combustion reaction (GNP) and calcination at 450 and 1100 °C are shown in Figure 2a–c. The percentage of phases and unit cell parameters of the newly formed compound were determined based on XRD data (Table 1). For all three systems present, it was established that two-phase samples were obtained, representing two polymorphic modifications that simultaneously crystallized in the same monoclinic space group, C2/m. Phase transitions and polymorphic modifications are characteristic of CoMoO4 powders [50], which were not absent in our case, despite the doping of CoMoO4 with a small amount of holmium, ytterbium, and gadolinium. Based on previously conducted research related to the same applied synthesis for undoped CoMoO4 [30], it was expected that only one polymorphic β modification would be formed after the synthesis. However, due to doping with Ho, Yb, and Gd during the combustion reaction, we achieved the presence of both modifications at all tested temperatures in unequal proportions. The XRD patterns for the synthesized samples (Figure 2d) and those related to the samples calcined at 450 °C (Figure 2e), the presence of two peaks at 26.1–26.4 and 29.2 degrees was observed, thus identifying two resulting phases, which represent two polymorphic modifications: α-CoMoO4 (base-centered monoclinic space group C2/m, no. 12, ICSD #23808, corresponds to 28.5 degrees, and Miller indices [220]) and β-CoMoO4 (monoclinic space group C2/m, no. 12, ICSD #78328, corresponds to 25.7 degrees, and Miller indices [220]) [35]. By identifying the samples heat-treated at 1100 °C (Figure 2f), we assumed that the α-isomorph was the only phase since the α-phase was reported to be stable above 1000 °C [24,49,51], but the β-isomorph was also present. The diffraction peaks we studied (Figure 2) agree well with the values given in the ICSD cards, with the difference that there was a minor shift of the peaks to one of the sides and an increase in their intensities. According to X-ray measurements, the XRD patterns of all powders appeared similar to each other for the same calcination temperatures despite the doping with different rare earth elements. The only noticeable difference in the Yb-doped samples relates to the proportion of phases. Based on peaks with pronounced intensities, the β polymorph is the dominant phase in the Yb-doped samples (Table 1).
The diffraction peaks seen in Figure 2 are broad and of low intensity for the samples synthesized and calcined at a temperature of 450 °C, which indicates the nanocrystalline nature of the powders. However, the sample calcined at 1100 °C is also visually different, with a significantly higher degree of crystallinity. The XRD analysis of the samples confirmed that Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) exhibits thermochromic behavior and that the temperature factor plays an important role in forming α, β, or both polymorphs.
We compared the parameters of the unit cells of the samples, synthesized and calcined at 450 or 1100 °C with the composition of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) (Table 1), and before the published date for undoped CoMoO4 [30]. We did not find any regularity in the changes in unit cell parameters. The presence of both polymorphs at temperatures where they should be the only phases is evident. By substituting part of Co2+ (rion(Co2+) = 0.745 Å) with Ho3+ (rion(Ho3+) = 1.041 Å), or with Yb3+ (rion(Yb3+) = 1.008 Å), or with Gd3+ (rion(Gd3+) = 1.078 Å), there was a significant impact on the temperature of the phase transition [24]. The reason for this is the presence of Ho3+, Yb3+, or Gd3+ in the system, which creates Mo–O covalent bonds but not enough to stabilize Mo6+ in a tetrahedral environment with stabilization of the β form, which is why the βα transition occurs at higher temperatures [24].

3.3. FTIR

The prepared Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4, Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4, and Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4 samples were characterized by FTIR spectroscopy to investigate the nature of the bonding and understand the structural differences between them, as shown in Figure 3a–c. In the first three spectra (Figure 3a), which correspond to Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 samples, a weak band at ~2350 cm−1 attributed to physisorbed CO2 can be observed [52]. The two bands present at 1610 and 1415 cm−1 represent the stretching and bending vibrations of the O–H and H–O–H bonds due to the absorbed water molecules from atmospheric moisture [53] and the nitrate band and binding of the primary amine (i.e., H2N–CH2-) [54]. Otherwise, during the combustion reaction, glycine has a double role; it acts as a fuel and also as a complexant. The interaction of metal cations completely complexed with glycine is confirmed by the band at 1415 cm−1 [54]. The spectrum shows three main bands at 950, 665, and 560 cm−1. The two vibrational bands at 950 cm−1 and 665 cm−1 are attributed to the activation of the ν1 vibration of the distorted MoO4 tetrahedral units present in CoMoO4 [30], while the band at 560 cm−1 is due to the Ho-O species [55]. Other vibrational bands at 840 and 779 cm−1 are ascribed to the stretching vibration of Mo–O–Mo. The superposition of ν4 and ν5 of MoO and ν3 of CoO6 building groups of CoMoO4 was attributed to the band at 418 cm−1 [30,56].
The second three spectra (Figure 3b), which correspond to the Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4 samples, and the third three spectra (Figure 3c), which correspond to the Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4 samples, are more similar to each other, and bands that are not present in the Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 samples can be observed in them. Namely, weak absorption bands extend in the ~3200 cm−1 range, which is attributed to the H–O–H groups of water molecules formed by humidity [53,57]. The two bands present at 1610 and 1415 cm−1 represent the stretching and bending vibrations of the O–H and H–O–H bonds [52], and the nitrate band and binding of the primary amine (i.e., H2N–CH2–) [54] are more pronounced in those samples. For spectrums from Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4 samples, the characteristic band around 545 cm−1 confirms the stretching vibrations of Yb ions [58]. The bands around 542 and 440 cm−1 assigned to the Gd-O vibration [59] are characteristic of spectrums from Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4 samples.

3.4. FESEM Analysis

The information on the morphology and chemical analysis of the samples was provided by FE-SEM together with EDS analysis and presented in Figure 4. One can see the micrographs of as-prepared as well as calcined samples at 450 and 1100 °C (Figure 4a–c), recorded using the same experimental conditions. A high level of shape anisotropy and particle size in the form of agglomerates is observed. Also, microstructure differences are clearly noticeable in all three samples. The as-prepared samples tend to form irregular agglomeration with a grape-like structure (Figure 4a). Irregular agglomerations consist of polyhedral grains and plate-like crystals of various sizes, and between them are interstices, cavities, and voids. On the other hand, the sample calcined at 450 °C shows leaf-like nanosheets (Figure 4b) forming plate-acicular agglomerated grains with too many occasionally connected pores. The pores are most likely the result of a large amount/volume of gases that evolved during this synthesis method [60]. A sample calcined at 1100 °C possesses large, irregular, polyhedral grains (Figure 4c) with smooth and non-porous surfaces. Pores and cavities are almost absent in these samples, which will be evident and confirmed during further characterization methods and will be presented in this article. Because the morphology of the other two sets of samples was quite identical, only EDS spectra were presented to demonstrate the inclusion of constituent elements.
In order to confirm the presence of wanted ions, EDS spectra were recorded in the energy range of 0–10 eV for all samples, and only one representative EDS spectrum was presented in Figure 4d,e for each Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, and Gd). The spectra confirmed that all Co, Mo, O, and R elements are present in the structure (Table 2).

3.5. Spectroscopy

The color of the synthesized samples of Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4, Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4, and Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4 was visually observed as a dark blue, dark purple, and black tint, respectively. After spectrophotometric measurement of the color, it was noted that the dominant wavelengths were 427, 456, and 469 nm for samples with Ho, Yb, and Gd, respectively. Color saturation is most pronounced after doping with Ho, reaching 99.8%; Yb doping results in around 65% saturation, while the least saturated sample, 13%, is the one doped with Gd (Table 3).
After subjecting the synthesized sample to heating treatment, there was a complete change in the color and intensity (Table 3). The dark purple/black shade, after heating at 450 °C, shifts to a higher wavelength with lower color purity, 589.02 nm (Dc) and 4.4% (Pc) for the sample doped with Ho. The transition that occurs in this sample corresponds to the transition that occurs after heating. The measured wavelength of 589.02 nm falls between yellow and orange-red light, although in that spectral area, it was noted that purple and bluish/black tints also appear [61]. Wavelengths at around 580 nm correspond to the transmitted color, which is visually observed as violet, blue, or green (Figure 5). The pronounced change in dominant wavelength and the purity of the color between the synthesized sample with Ho and the same sample after the heating at 1100 °C is due to Co concentrations. When aluminum oxide is heated with cobalt compounds or when cobalt salt is precipitated with an alkali, a bright blue precipitate forms from an oxidized black starting compound [62]. The addition to the blue color shift gives molybdenum content that, after heating, leads to the formation of the so-called molybdenum blues. The blue color is due to the presence of colored cations, violet cobalt (II) molybdate, CoMoO4 [63,64].
A dominant wavelength of 456 nm was measured for the synthesized sample doped with Yb, which corresponds to the dark blue region of the visible spectrum (380 nm to 750 nm), with a color purity of 65.3% (Figure 5). Similar to the previous sample doped with Ho, this color is due to the concentration of cobalt and molybdenum compounds, which produce dark blue colors [62,63,64]. The color change, occurring after heating, is due to the presence of Yb, causing a dark blue–green color shift after heating, which was too saturated for absorption measurements. Therefore, the dominant wavelength shifted to 585 nm with a color purity of 4.39%, corresponding to the yellow region of the visible spectrum (570 nm to 590 nm). This color represents the transmitted color after absorption of other colors, and it is directly opposite on the diagram from the dark blue spectra (corresponding to ≈485 nm). Ytterbium, which is white, and its salts are colorless in visible light, would produce an emerald green or even orange color at very high temperatures (3000 °C) [65]. A similar shift of color was observed after heating the sample at 1100 °C with the color corresponding to 472 nm (PC = 32.8%) in the blue–purple area with its corresponding color in the yellow–orange region (Figure 5). This suggests that a small amount of Yb would cause a slight shift in its color from dark blue to the purple-blue end of the spectrum after heating.
The color of the synthesized sample doped with Gd closely resembles the previously mentioned samples doped with Ho and Yb. A slight change is observed due to the dominant wavelength, which is 469 nm, corresponding to the dark blue region [62,63,64]. This makes the sample lighter, and its purity color percentage corroborates it at 13.1%. The color change occurs after heating at 450 °C, resulting in a yellow hue in the visible spectrum corresponding to the absorption of its complementary color, dark blue–purple color, and correlates to the reaction of Gd with other elements in the sample. After heating at 1100 °C, the investigated sample yields a color with the dominant wavelength of 475 nm (PC = 30.3%), which is closely similar to the previously investigated samples (Table 3).

3.6. BET Analysis

The specific surface areas of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) samples, synthesized and calcined at 450 and 1100 °C, were measured by BET (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller) analysis using the nitrogen adsorption analysis data shown in Figure 6. All investigating samples calcined at 1100 °C and Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4 calcined at 450 °C did not show a specific surface area; therefore, in the following text, figure, and table, data related to these measurements are missing. If we return to Figure 4c, where the absence of pores was observed, the result of the BET analysis could be guessed. Figure 6. shows the full adsorption/desorption isotherm of nitrogen adsorbed on the sample’s surface. Nitrogen adsorption isotherms for Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 and Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4 samples, synthesized and calcined at 450 °C, and only Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4 samples synthesized as the amount of N2 adsorbed as a function of relative pressure at −196 °C, are shown in Figure 6.
The obtained isotherms are characterized by pronounced capillary-condensation hysteresis and belong to type IV isotherms attributed to monolayer–multilayer adsorption according to the IUPAC classification [66]. They are corresponding to mesoporous materials. The samples have the shape of the hysteresis loop of type H3. Isotherms revealing type H3 hysteresis do not exhibit any limiting adsorption at high P/P0 and are observed with non-rigid aggregates of plate-like particles, giving rise to slit-shaped pores [67]. The observed hysteresis consists of one loop. The hysteresis loop (in the region of relative pressure 0.4 < P/P0 < 1) can be attributed to the classical type H3, which indicates the presence of bottle-shaped mesopores. Table 4 presents the values for the specific surfaces of the examined samples calculated by the BET equation, SBET. SBET values for Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 samples are in the range of 3 to 14 m2 g−1; for Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4 samples, they are in the range of 11 to 16 m2 g−1; and for the Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4 sample, 10 m2 g−1.
Pore size distribution (PSD) of Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 and Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4 samples synthesized and calcinated at 450 °C is shown in Table 4. The pore radius of the samples varies between 9 and 11 nm, confirming the mesoporous structure of both samples. As indicated by the volume of micropores, all samples have only a small amount of micropores. The median pore radius for all samples is given in Table 4.

4. Conclusions

Over the years, thermochromic materials have been intensively studied for their wide-ranging applications in modernization, urbanization, and improving healthcare systems. These materials require investigation through synthesis and processing routes to ensure they are more efficient and durable when used in specific applications [27]. Despite its limitations, this study’s findings support the following conclusions:
The combustion process described here through the glycine nitrate procedure (GNP) is one of the innovative material processing techniques. Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) samples were successfully synthesized using this method in a technically simple, fast, and low-cost way.
A comparative analysis was applied for the newly obtained powder characterization using several experimental techniques. The DTA curve for the synthesized Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) powders indicates that the doping with holmium, ytterbium, and gadolinium caused a change in the temperature ranges for polymorphic transitions. So, the possibility of the creation of β-Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) is in the temperature range from 325 to 450 °C, and the formation of α-Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) in the form of polymorphic transition βα at 1003 °C.
XRD structural analysis of the investigated samples established that Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) powders crystallize in the monoclinic space group C2/m, no. 12. Two structural types appear, designated like polymorphs α and β, whose amount of polymorphs varies with increasing temperature.
The influence of holmium, ytterbium, and gadolinium as dopants led to significant changes in the temperature range of polymorph formation and affected its morphological properties. The tendency of agglomeration and an inhomogeneous microstructure with plate crystals have been retained.
Following the heat treatment of the synthesized sample, we observed a notable change in color and intensity. The dominant wavelength (Dc) exhibited an increase for all samples treated at 450 °C, and interestingly, even the samples subjected to 1100 °C showed a higher dominant wavelength than the synthesized samples. It is important to note that the color purity (Pc) varied depending on the dopant element. Specifically, the synthesized Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 demonstrated the highest color purity, succeeded by Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4 at 450 °C, while Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4 at 1100 °C exhibited a comparatively lower level of purity.
The mesoporous structure was confirmed in the synthesized and calcined samples at 450 °C; the samples and the surface area are between 3 and 16 m2g−1, while we could not determine it for the samples calcined at 1100 °C for all samples and the sample of Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4 at 450 °C.
Preliminary investigations of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (where R = Ho, Yb, Gd) powders suggest that these oxide materials may hold considerable promise for future applications. Their unique properties appear to offer opportunities in areas that have not been extensively explored, potentially contributing to the modernization and advancement of multiple industries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R. and M.Č.; methodology, M.R., M.M. and M.Č.; software, M.R. and U.Č.; validation, V.D., V.L. and S.S.; formal analysis, U.Č.; investigation, M.R., M.M., M.Č. and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R., V.D. and V.L.; writing—review and editing, M.R., M.M. and S.S.; visualization, M.R. and U.Č. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia, based on Contract no. 451-03-66/2024-03/200017 through the realization of research theme 1702414 (“Vinča” Institute of Nuclear Sciences—National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade); 451-03-65/2024-03/200126 (Faculty of Mining and Geology, University of Belgrade); 451-03-66/2024-03/200161 (Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Ahmed, N.; Kraus, H.; Kim, H.J.; Mokina, V.; Tsiumra, V.; Wagner, A.; Zhydachevskyy, Y.; Mykhaylyk, V.B. Characterisation of tungstate and molybdate crystals ABO4 (A = Ca, Sr, Zn, Cd; B = W, Mo) for luminescence lifetime cryothermometry. Materialia 2018, 4, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Seevakan, K.; Manikandan, A.; Devendran, P.; Baykal, A.; Alagesan, T. Electrochemical and magneto-optical properties of cobalt molybdate nano-catalyst as high-performance supercapacitor. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 17735–17742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Khadka, A.; Samuel, E.; Joshi, B.; Il Kim, Y.; Aldalbahi, A.; El-Newehy, M.; Lee, H.-S.; Yoon, S.S. Bimetallic CoMoO4 Nanosheets on Freestanding Nanofiber as Wearable Supercapacitors with Long-Term Stability. Int. J. Energy Res. 2023, 2023, 2910207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, S.; Wu, J.; Wang, G.; Wang, J.; Fan, L.; Hao, J.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Wu, H.; Li, Y.; et al. Preparation of Pie-Shaped CoMoO4 with High Capacitive and Photocatalytic Properties by a Solvothermal Method. Coatings 2022, 12, 1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ezeigwe, E.R.; Khiew, P.S.; Siong, C.W.; Kong, I.; Tan, M.T.T. Synthesis of NiMoO4 nanorods on graphene and superior electrochemical performance of the resulting ternary based composites. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 13772–13780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yesuraj, J.; Elumalai, V.; Muthuraaman, B.; Suthanthiraraj, S.A.; Elanthamilan, E.; Merlin, J.P. A facile sonochemical assisted synthesis of α-MnMoO4/PANI nanocomposite electrode for supercapacitor applications. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2017, 797, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Veerasubramani, G.K.; Krishnamoorthy, K.; Radhakrishnan, S.; Kim, N.J.; Sang, J.K. Synthesis, characterization, and electrochemical properties of CoMoO4 nanostructures. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 5186–5193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bhattacharjee, J.; Roy, S. Exploration of Molybdenum Oxide Compounds—A Review. Catal. Res. 2024, 4, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bahari, M.B.; Mamat, C.R.; Jalil, A.A.; Hassan, N.S.; Sawal, M.H.; Rajendran, S.; Alam, M.N.H.Z. Molybdenum as cathode materials: Paving the way for sustainable biohydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells. Process Saf. Environ. 2024, 191, Part B, 1633–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ruan, Q.; Qian, Y.; Xue, M.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Q. Emerging two-dimensional Mo-based materials for rechargeable metal-ion batteries: Advances and perspectives. J. Energy Chem. 2024, 89, 487–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, X.; Zhou, G.; Wang, H.; Yin, J.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, F.; Siddharth, K.; Zhu, S.; Shao, M. Defect Engineering of Molybdenum-Based Materials for Electrocatalysis. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Senthilkumar, B.; Meyrick, D.; Lee, Y.-S.; Selvan, R.K. Synthesis and improved electrochemical performances of nano β-NiMoO4-CoMoO4·xH2O composites for asymmetric supercapacitors. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 16542–16548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rani, B.J.; Swathi, S.; Yuvakkumar, R.; Ravi, G.; Kumar, P.; Babu, E.S.; Alfarraj, S.; Alharbi, S.A.; Velauthapillai, D. Solvothermal synthesis of CoMoO4 nanostructures for electrochemical applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 5989–6000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, P.; Ruan, C.; Xu, J.; Xie, Y. Supercapacitive performance of CoMoO4 with oxygen vacancy porous nanosheet. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 330, 135334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rico, J.L.; A’valos-Borja, M.; Barrera, A.; Hargreaves, J.S.J. Template-free synthesis of CoMoO4 rods and their characterization. Mater. Res. Bull. 2013, 48, 4614–4617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kazemi, S.H.; Tabibpour, M.; Kiani, M.A.; Kazemi, H. An advanced asymmetric supercapacitor based on a binder-free electrode fabricated from ultrathin CoMoO4 nano-dandelions. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 71156–71164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gao, Y.; Tao, J.; Li, J.; Xie, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhang, C. Construction of CoMoO4 nanorods wrapped by Ni-Co-S nanosheets for high-performance supercapacitor. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 925, 166705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Raizada, P.; Soni, V.; Kumar, A.; Singh, P.; Parwaz Khan, A.A.; Asiri, A.M.; Thakur, V.K.; Nguyen, V.-H. Surface defect engineering of metal oxides photocatalyst for energy application and water treatment. J. Mater. 2021, 7, 388–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khalid, N.R.; Hamza, S.M.; Ali, F.; Iqbal, T.; Rafique, M.; Imran, M.; Assiri, M.A. Synthesis and photocatalytic performance of CoMoO4/MoO3 composite for wastewater treatment. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 35, 105816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mayers, J.; Hofman, B.; Sobiech, I.; Kwesiga, M.P. Insights into the biocompatibility of biodegradable metallic molybdenum for cardiovascular applications-a critical review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2024, 12, 1457553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lakhlifi, H.; Jabbar, Y.E.; Guillemet-Fritsch, S.; Durand, B.; Er-Rakho, L.; Ouatib, R.E. Purple nanometrics pigments based on cobalt-doped manganese molybdate: Synthesis, characterization, structural, thermal, optical, colorimetric and chemical properties. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1248, 131458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shameem, A.; Devendran, P.; Murugan, A.; Siva, V.; Asath Bahadur, S.A. Cost-effective synthesis of efficient La doped CoMoO4 nanocomposite electrode for sustainable high-energy symmetric supercapacitors. J. Energy Storage 2023, 73, 108856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ragu, R.; Shanmugam, P.; Sridharan, M.B.; Muniappan, E.; Dheivasigamani, T. Investigation of rare earth metal ions (Sm and Er) doped CoMoO4 polymorphs for photocatalytic dye degradation. Phys. B 2025, 696, 416616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Costa, R.K.S.; Teles, S.C.; de Sousa Filho, P.C.; Dias, A.; Siqueira, K.P.F. Influence of europium doping on the structural phase-transition temperature of β- and α- CoMoO4 polymorphs. Mater. Res. Bull. 2019, 118, 110517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hakami, A.; Srinivasan, S.S.; Biswas, P.K.; Krishnegowda, A.; Wallen, S.L.; Stefanakos, E.K. Review on thermochromic materials: Development, characterization, and applications. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2022, 19, 377–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Talvenmaa, P. Introduction to chromic materials. In Woodhead Publishing Series in Textiles, Intelligent Textiles and Clothing; Mattila, H., Ed.; Woodhed Puhlishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2006; pp. 193–205. ISBN 9781845690052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hossain, S.; Sadoh, A.; Ravindra, N.M. Principles, properties and preparation of thermochromic materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. Int. J. 2023, 7, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guzik, M.; Tomaszewicz, E.; Guyot, Y.; Legendziewicz, J.; Boulon, G. Eu3+ luminescence from different sites in a scheelite-type cadmium molybdate red phosphor with vacancies. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 8582–8594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, J.; Zhang, N.; Zou, L.; Gan, S. Formation mechanism and optical properties of CdMoO4 and CdMoO4:Ln3+ (Ln = Pr, Sm, Eu, Dy, Ho and Er) microspheres synthesized via a facile sonochemical route. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 38455–38465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rosić, M.; Zarubica, A.; Šaponjić, A.; Babić, B.; Zagorac, J.; Jordanov, D.; Matović, B. Structural and photocatalytic examination of CoMoO4 nanopowders synthesized by GNP method. Mater. Res. Bull. 2018, 98, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Patil, K.C.; Hegde, M.S.; Rattan, T.; Aruna, S.T. Chemistry of Nanocrystalline Oxide Materials: Combustion Synthesis, Properties and Applications; World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.: Singapore, 2008; pp. 43–45. Available online: https://ebin.pub/chemistry-of-nanocrystalline-oxide-materials-combustion-synthesis-properties-and-applications-978-981-279-314-0-981-279-314-3.html (accessed on 22 April 2024).
  32. Nair, S.R.; Purohit, R.D.; Tyagi, A.K.; Sinha, P.K.; Sharmaz, B.P. Low-Temperature Sintering of La(Ca)CrO3 Powder Prepared through the Combustion Process. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 91, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rigaku. PDXL Integrated X-Ray Powder Diffraction Software; Rigaku: Tokyo, Japan, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  34. International Crystallographical Database (ICDD); PDF-2, Release 2023; ICDD: Newtown Square, PA, USA, 2012.
  35. Available online: https://icsd.products.fiz-karlsruhe.de/ (accessed on 15 May 2024).
  36. Kraus, W.; Nolze, G. POWDER CELL—A program for the representation and manipulation of crystal structures and calculation of the resulting X-ray powder patterns. J. Appl. Cryst. 1996, 29, 301–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Available online: http://powdercell-for-windows.software.informer.com/2.4/ (accessed on 15 May 2024).
  38. Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. 1931 Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage Proceedings; Huitième Session; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1932; pp. 19–29. [Google Scholar]
  39. Available online: http://www.radiantimaging.com (accessed on 18 August 2024).
  40. Barret, E.P.; Joyner, L.G.; Halenda, P.P. The Determination of Pore Volume and Area Distributions in Porous Substances. I. Computations from Nitrogen Isotherms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lippens, B.C.; Linsen, B.G.; de Boer, J.H. Studies on Pore Systems in Catalysts I. The Adsorption of Nitrogen; Apparatus and Calculation. J. Catal. 1964, 3, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Eda, K.; Uno, Y.; Nagai, N.; Sotani, N.; Whittingham, M.S. Crystal structure of cobalt molybdate hydrate CoMoO4 * nH2O. J. Solid State Chem. 2005, 178, 2791–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wiesmann, M.; Ehrenberg, H.; Wltschek, G.; Zinn, P.; Weitzel, H. Fuess, Crystal structures and magnetic properties of the high-pressure modifications of CoMoO4 and NiMoO4. J. Magn. Magn Mater. 1995, 150, L1–L4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Weiss, I.; Muth, C.; Drumm, R.; Kirchner, H. Thermal decomposition of the amino acids glycine, cysteine, aspartic acid, asparagine, glutamic acid, glutamine, arginine and histidine. BMC Biophys. 2018, 11, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lai, Q.Y.; Lu, J.Z.; Yan, F.Y.; Ji, X.Y. The use of oxalates as precursors for the low temperature synthesis of LiNi1-xCoxVO4, Part V New synthetic methods, characterization and theory. In Frontiers of Solid State Chemistry; Feng, S.H., Chen, J.S., Eds.; World Scientific Publishing Co.: Singapore, 2002; p. 515. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sen, A.; Pramanik, P. A chemical synthetic route for the preparation of fine-grained metal molybdate powders. Mater. Lett. 2002, 52, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yan, C.H.; Xu, Z.G.; Xheng, F.X.; Wang, Z.M.; Sun, L.D.; Liao, C.S.; Jia, J.T. Nanophased CoFe2O4 prepared by combustion method. Solid State Commun. 1999, 111, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Koul, R.K.; Suri, S.; Singh, V.; Bamzai, K.K. Synthesis, Characterization, and Thermal Kinetics of Mixed Gadolinium: Calcium Heptamolybdate System. Hindawi Publ. Corp. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2014, 141463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shaheen, W.M.; Maksod, I.H.A.E. Thermal solid–solid interactions and physicochemical properties of CO3O4/MoO3 system treated with Al2O3. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 475, 874–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Costa, R.K.S.; Teles, S.C.; Siqueira, K.P.F. The relationship between crystal structures and thermochromism in CoMoO4. Chem. Pap. 2021, 75, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zagorac, D.; Schön, J.C.; Rosić, M.; Zagorac, J.; Jordanov, D.; Luković, J.; Matović, B. Theoretical and experimental study of structural phases in CoMoO4. Cryst. Res. Technol. 2017, 52, 1700069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, C.; Wöll, C. IR spectroscopy applied to metal oxide surfaces: Adsorbate vibrations and beyond. Adv. Phys. X 2017, 2, 373–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Vinothkumar, V.; Abinaya, M.; Chen, S.-M. Ultrasonic assisted preparation of CoMoO4 nanoparticles modified electrochemical sensor for chloramphenicol determination. J. Solid State Chem. 2021, 302, 122392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Weifan, C.; Fengsheng, L.; Leili, L.; Yang, L. One-step synthesis of nanocrytalline perovskite LaMn03 powders via microwave-Induced solution combustion route. J. Rare Earth 2006, 24, 782–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Narasimharao, K.; Ali, T.T. Influence of synthesis conditions on physico-chemical and photocatalytic properties of rare earth (Ho, Nd and Sm) oxides. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 1819–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kumar, M.; Singh, R.; Khajuria, H.; Sheikh, H.N. Facile hydrothermal synthesis of nanocomposites of nitrogen doped graphene with metal molybdates (NG-MMoO4) (M=Mn, Co, and Ni) for enhanced photodegradation of methylene blue. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2017, 28, 9423–9434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bhiri, N.M.; Dammak, M.; Carvajal, J.J.; Aguiló, M.; Díaz, F.; Pujol, M.C. Stoichiometric dependence and laser heating effect on the luminescence thermometric performance of Er3+, Yb3+: YuGdwVO4 microparticles in the non-saturation regime. Mater. Res. Bull. 2022, 151, 111801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bhemarajam, J.; Varkolu, M.; Prasad, P.S.; Prasad, M. Effect of Yb3+ ions on spectroscopic and optical properties of Bi2O3–B2O3–Li2O–PbO glass system. Results Opt. 2024, 14, 100582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tamrakar, R.K.; Bisen, D.P.; Brahme, N. Comparison of photoluminescence properties of Gd2O3 phosphor synthesized by combustion and solid state reaction method. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2014, 7, 550–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rosić, M.; Logar, M.; Devečerski, A.; Prekajski, M.; Radosavljević-Mihajlović, A.; Kusigerski, V.; Spasojević, V.; Matović, B. Synthesis, structural and magnetic properties of nanostructured Ca0.9Gd0.1MnO3 obtained by modified glycine nitrate procedure (MGNP). Ceram. Int. 2011, 37, 1313–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Guineau, B.; Lorblanchet, M.; Gratuze, B.; Dulin, L.; Roger, P.; Akrich, R.; Muller, F. Manganese black pigments in prehistoric paintings: The case of the black frieze of pech merle (France). Archaeometry 2001, 43, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wilteveen, H.J.; Farnau, E.F. Colors Developed by Cobalt Oxides. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1921, 13, 1061–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. International Molybdenum Association. 2008. Available online: https://www.imoa.info/molybdenum/molybdenum-properties.php (accessed on 12 July 2024).
  64. Huckle, W.G.; Lalor, E. Inorganic Pigments. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1955, 47, 1501–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Koch, E.-C.; Weiser, V.; Roth, E.; Knapp, S.; Kelzenberg, S. Combustion of Ytterbium Metal, Propellants, Explosives. Pyrotechnics 2012, 37, 9–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sing, K.S.W.; Everett, D.H.; Haul, R.A.W.; Moscou, L.; Pierotti, R.A.; Rouquerol, J.; Siemieniewska, T. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 603–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lowell, S.; Shields, J.E.; Thomas, M.A.; Thommes, M. Charactrization of Porous Solids and Powders: Surface Area, Pore Size and Density; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; p. 44. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. DTA curve for the synthesized powder of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd): (a,b) Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4; (c,d) Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4; (e) Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4; (b,d) Application Gaussian peak functions from OriginPro 8.5 (green lines).
Figure 1. DTA curve for the synthesized powder of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd): (a,b) Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4; (c,d) Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4; (e) Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4; (b,d) Application Gaussian peak functions from OriginPro 8.5 (green lines).
Materials 18 00397 g001
Figure 2. XRD pattern of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) powder sample after combustion reaction: (a) Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 (b) Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4 (c) Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4; * undoped CoMoO4 [30]; (d) comparison of undoped synthesized CoMoO4 with doped synthesized Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) samples; (e) comparison of undoped CoMoO4 at 450 °C with doped Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) samples at 450 °C; (f) comparison of undoped CoMoO4 at 1000 °C with doped Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) samples at 1100 °C.
Figure 2. XRD pattern of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) powder sample after combustion reaction: (a) Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 (b) Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4 (c) Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4; * undoped CoMoO4 [30]; (d) comparison of undoped synthesized CoMoO4 with doped synthesized Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) samples; (e) comparison of undoped CoMoO4 at 450 °C with doped Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) samples at 450 °C; (f) comparison of undoped CoMoO4 at 1000 °C with doped Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) samples at 1100 °C.
Materials 18 00397 g002
Figure 3. The FTIR spectra of the as-prepared Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) samples: (a) Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 (b) Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4 (c) Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4.
Figure 3. The FTIR spectra of the as-prepared Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) samples: (a) Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 (b) Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4 (c) Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4.
Materials 18 00397 g003
Figure 4. FE-SEM micrographs of Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 as-prepared sample (a); (b) at 450 °C; (c) at 1100 °C; (d) one representative EDS spectrum of Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4; (e) one representative EDS spectrum of Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4; (f) one representative EDS spectrum of Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4.
Figure 4. FE-SEM micrographs of Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 as-prepared sample (a); (b) at 450 °C; (c) at 1100 °C; (d) one representative EDS spectrum of Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4; (e) one representative EDS spectrum of Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4; (f) one representative EDS spectrum of Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4.
Materials 18 00397 g004
Figure 5. Chromatic diagram of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) samples.
Figure 5. Chromatic diagram of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) samples.
Materials 18 00397 g005
Figure 6. Nitrogen adsorption isotherms, as the amount of N2 adsorbed as a function of relative pressure for: (a) Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 samples synthesized and at 450 °C; (b) Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4 samples synthesized; (c) Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4 samples synthesized and at 450 °C.
Figure 6. Nitrogen adsorption isotherms, as the amount of N2 adsorbed as a function of relative pressure for: (a) Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 samples synthesized and at 450 °C; (b) Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4 samples synthesized; (c) Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4 samples synthesized and at 450 °C.
Materials 18 00397 g006
Table 1. Percentage and cell parameters [Å, degree] and volume [Å3] of the unit cell for Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) phases were observed directly after synthesis (GNP) and in samples that have been calcinated at 450 and 1100 °C, respectively. The data were obtained using the software package Powder Cell 2.4 [36,37] and compared with data from reference [30] marked with *.
Table 1. Percentage and cell parameters [Å, degree] and volume [Å3] of the unit cell for Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) phases were observed directly after synthesis (GNP) and in samples that have been calcinated at 450 and 1100 °C, respectively. The data were obtained using the software package Powder Cell 2.4 [36,37] and compared with data from reference [30] marked with *.
PhaseSynthesized450 °C1100 °C
Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4
ICSD card #78328
a = 10.43
b = 9.63
c = 7.06
β = 105.33
V = 683.67
85.44%
a = 10.39
b = 9.43
c = 7.06
β = 107.33
V = 660.12
93.49%
a = 10.49
b = 9.53
c = 7.16
β = 106.34
V = 686.69
5.95%
Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4
ICSD card #23808
a = 9.77
b = 8.95
c = 7.86
β = 114.82
V = 623.43
14.56%
a = 9.65
b = 8.78
c = 7.70
β = 112.83
V = 600.88
6.51%
a = 9.61
b = 8.86
c = 7.66
β = 112.82
V = 601.71
94.05%
Rp6.487.2510.30
Rwp8.239.9514.74
Rexp0.240.50.91
Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4
ICSD card #78328
a = 10.39
b = 9.61
c = 7.06
β = 105.33
V = 679.45
86.26%
a = 10.52
b = 9.56
c = 7.07
β = 106.70
V = 680.81
96.10%
a = 10.39
b = 9.43
c = 7.10
β = 107.33
V = 663.81
89.30%
Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4
ICSD card #23808
a = 9.77
b = 8.95
c = 7.78
β = 114.82
V = 617.08
13.74%
a = 9.63
b = 8.90
c = 7.69
β = 113.88
V = 602.48
3.90%
a = 9.57
b = 8.90
c = 7.66
β = 112.82
V = 601.64
10.70%
Rp4.928.8614.08
Rwp6.3011.8422.91
Rexp0.220.351.05
Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4
ICSD card #78328
a = 10.39
b = 9.43
c = 7.07
β = 106.74
V = 663.28
87.20%
a = 10.46
b = 9.43
c = 7.06
β = 107.33
V = 664.33
94.97%
a = 10.39
b = 9.43
c = 7.08
β = 107.31
V = 662.45
38.27%
Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4
ICSD card #23808
a = 9.76
b = 8.76
c = 7.86
β = 114.82
V = 609.69
12.80%
a = 9.76
b = 8.94
c = 7.69
β = 112.82
V = 618.59
5.03%
a = 9.71
b = 8.85
c = 7.66
β = 114.08
V = 601.35
61.73%
Rp5.149.159.33
Rwp6.6912.7913.53
Rexp0.230.380.70
CoMoO4 *
ICSD card #78328
a = 10.57
b = 9.63
c = 7.21
β = 106.59
V = 703.08
100%
a = 10.57
b = 9.62
c = 7.22
β = 107.33
V = 700.84
100%


/
CoMoO4 *
ICSD card #23808


/


/
a = 9.71
b = 8.85
c = 7.66
β = 114.10
V = 600.70
100%
Rp3.534.214.12
Rwp4.495.606.05
Rexp0.170.210.32
Table 2. The results of the quantitative analysis from EDS spectra of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) samples.
Table 2. The results of the quantitative analysis from EDS spectra of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) samples.
Oxides (wt.%) Oxides (wt.%) Oxides (wt.%)
CoO26.49CoO26.54CoO26.64
MoO266.58MoO266.48MoO266.82
Ho2O36.93Yb2O36.99Gd2O36.53
Elements (at.%) Elements (at.%) Elements (at.%)
Co38.82Co38.95Co38.91
Mo57.15Mo57.15Mo57.15
Ho4.03Yb3.90Gd3.94
Ho/(Ho + Co)9.4Yb/(Yb + Co)9.1Gd/(Gd + Co)9.2
Table 3. Dominant wavelength (Dc) and purity of the color (Pc) of investigated synthesized (synt.), calcinated at 450 °C and 1100 °C samples.
Table 3. Dominant wavelength (Dc) and purity of the color (Pc) of investigated synthesized (synt.), calcinated at 450 °C and 1100 °C samples.
Sample Dc (nm)Pc (%)
Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4synt.42799.8
450 °C5894.4
1100 °C47338.6
Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4synt.45665.3
450 °C58578.7
1100 °C47232.8
Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4synt.46913.1
450 °C5777.4
1100 °C47520.3
Table 4. The specific surface area (SBET), mesopore including external surface area (Smeso), specific micropore volume (Vmic), pore volume (Vtotal), median pore radius (Rmed), and maximum pore radius (Rmax) of the Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) samples.
Table 4. The specific surface area (SBET), mesopore including external surface area (Smeso), specific micropore volume (Vmic), pore volume (Vtotal), median pore radius (Rmed), and maximum pore radius (Rmax) of the Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) samples.
SampleSbet,
(m2/g−1)
Smeso,
(m2/g−1)
Vmic
(cm3/g−1)
Vtotal
(cm3/g−1)
Rmed,
(nm)
Rmax,
(nm)
Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 synt.14.8798.5890.01190.04339.03897.1224
Co0.9Yb0.1MoO4 synt.10.42411.940.01130.0077/0.3195
Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4 synt.11.62715.880.01390.01211.7374.396
Co0.9Ho0.1MoO4 (450 °C)3.61419.780.01160.0072107.4783
Co0.9Gd0.1MoO4 (450 °C)16.2151.540.00890.044311.0028.6617
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rosić, M.; Milošević, M.; Čebela, M.; Dodevski, V.; Lojpur, V.; Čakar, U.; Stopic, S. Spectroscopic and Morphological Examination of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) Obtained by Glycine Nitrate Procedure. Materials 2025, 18, 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020397

AMA Style

Rosić M, Milošević M, Čebela M, Dodevski V, Lojpur V, Čakar U, Stopic S. Spectroscopic and Morphological Examination of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) Obtained by Glycine Nitrate Procedure. Materials. 2025; 18(2):397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020397

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rosić, Milena, Maja Milošević, Maria Čebela, Vladimir Dodevski, Vesna Lojpur, Uroš Čakar, and Srecko Stopic. 2025. "Spectroscopic and Morphological Examination of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) Obtained by Glycine Nitrate Procedure" Materials 18, no. 2: 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020397

APA Style

Rosić, M., Milošević, M., Čebela, M., Dodevski, V., Lojpur, V., Čakar, U., & Stopic, S. (2025). Spectroscopic and Morphological Examination of Co0.9R0.1MoO4 (R = Ho, Yb, Gd) Obtained by Glycine Nitrate Procedure. Materials, 18(2), 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020397

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop