Next Article in Journal
Chemically Modified Pineapple Leaf Fibre as a Filler of Polyurethane-Based Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of In-Situ Growth of Superconducting Al/InAs Hybrid Systems on GaAs for the Development of Quantum Electronic Circuits
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Microstructures, Mechanical Properties, and Energetic Characteristics of a Novel Dual-Phase Ti40Zr40W10Mo10 High-Entropy Alloy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microstructure and Thermal Cyclic Behavior of FeNiCoAlTaB High-Entropy Alloy

1
Department of Mechatronics Engineering, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua 50007, Taiwan
2
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(2), 387; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020387
Submission received: 29 November 2024 / Revised: 26 December 2024 / Accepted: 13 January 2025 / Published: 16 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Future Trends in High-Entropy Alloys (2nd Edition))

Abstract

:
This study investigates the grain morphology, microstructure, magnetic properties and shape memory properties of an Fe41.265Ni28.2Co17Al11Ta2.5B0.04 (at%) high-entropy alloy (HEA) cold-rolled to 98%. The EBSD results show that the texture intensities of the samples annealed at 1300 °C for 0.5 or 1 h are 2.45 and 2.82, respectively. This indicates that both samples were formed without any strong texture. The grain morphology results show that the grain size increased from 356.8 to 504.6 μm when the annealing time was increased from 0.5 to 1 h. The large grain size improved the recoverable strain due to a reduction in the grain constraint. As a result, annealing was carried out at 1300 °C/1 h for the remainder of the study. The hardness decreased at 24 h, then increased again at 48 h; this phenomenon was related to the austenite finish temperature. Thermo-magnetic analysis revealed that the austenite finish temperature increased when the samples were aged at 600 °C for between 12 and 24 h. When the aging time was prolonged to 48 h, the austenite finish temperature value decreased. X-ray diffraction (XRD) demonstrated that the peak of the precipitates emerged and intensified when the aging time was increased from 12 to 24 h at 600 °C. From the three-point bending shape memory test, the samples aged at 600 °C for 12 and 24 h had maximum recoverable strains of 2% and 3.6%, respectively. The stress–temperature slopes of the austenite finish temperature were 10.3 MPa/°C for 12 h and 6 MPa/°C for 24 h, respectively. Higher slope values correspond to lower recoverable strains.

1. Introduction

Conventional alloy design basically consists of selecting a main or principal element and then adding other elements to form the alloy. However, this traditional approach, which focuses on the terminal side of the phase diagram without exploring the vast central region, limits the potential for developing new alloys with improved properties. In 2004, Yeh et al. [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] developed the high-entropy alloy (HEA) design concept. An HEA was defined as having each of its principal element’s atomic percentages in the range of 5% to 35%. Subsequent research teams have expanded the compositional definition of high-entropy alloys to those alloys in which no single element exceeds 50% [8,9,10,11].
The Fe40.5Ni28Co17Al11.5Ta2.5B0.05 (at%) shape memory alloy (SMA), which exhibits a large recoverable strain of superelasticity (13.5%) and high tensile strength (1.2 GPa), was first reported by Tanaka et al. [12], who discovered that adding the tantalum (Ta) to the Fe-Ni-Co-Al-based SMA transformed its martensitic transformation from non-thermoelastic to thermoelastic. Additionally, adding a small amount of boron (B) is sufficient to inhibit the formation of a brittle second phase. Recent studies of the Fe-Ni-Co-Al-X and Fe-Ni-Co-Al-X-B-based (X: Ti, Nb, Ti + Nb and Ta) SMA systems have demonstrated a greater than 1.5% recoverable strain of superelasticity and shape memory effect in both polycrystalline and single-crystal structures [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. The new Fe-Ni-Co-Al-X-based system is a promising candidate material for different applications, such as in dampers and actuators in the aerospace, robotic and automobile industries [24,25].
In 2019, Zhang et al. [26] designed the non-equiatomic Fe43.76Ni27.5Co16.5Al10Ta2.2B0.04 (at%) high-entropy alloy. The FeNiCoAlTaB HEA not only demonstrated high tensile strength but also superelastic behavior. When the alloy was aged at 700 °C for 5 h (h) under tensile stress at room temperature, the tensile strain reached 12%, with a maximum stress value of 1 GPa before alloy fracture. In a superelastic test, the maximum superelastic strain was around 2.5% at room temperature and 1% at a cryogenic temperature (−196 °C). For a compressive sample aged at 700 °C for 96 h, the maximum compressive stress value exhibited was around 1.4 GPa at room temperature. In the three-point bending test, a strain of around 1% was first applied to a sample in liquid nitrogen; the sample then recovered to its original shape after unloading. Based on uniaxial tensile test results, the FeNiCoAlTaB HEA showed high ductility in a wide temperature range between −196 °C and 800 °C. The ductility is 12% at −196 °C and 21% at 800 °C [27].
The FeNiCoAlTaB HEA single-crystal micro-pillars with <100>, <111> and <110> orientation were used to investigate the effect of orientation on superelasticity [28]. The alloy was cold-rolled to 90%. The annealing and aging heat treatment conditions for this cold-rolled alloy were 1300 °C-0.5 h and 700 °C-5 h, respectively. The single crystals with <100>, <111> and <110> orientation were cut from the aged samples. The bright filed transmission electron microscope images demonstrate the precipitate’s size was between 4 and 8 nm and the precipitate’s volume fraction was 28% for alloy after aging at 700 °C for 5 h. From the compressive stress–strain results, the recoverable strain along <001>, <011> and <111> is 2.8%, 0.5% and 1.2%, respectively. The recoverable strain is smaller than the theoretical values. The reason is related to the selection of martensite variants. Based on the theory, one variant is in the compression direction, and it will suppress the formation of the corresponding variant pair (CVP). As a result, the dislocations are generated due to the incompatibility between the austenite and martensite interface. The dislocations inhibit the martensite to reverse back to austenite and result in a small recoverable strain.
Huang et al. [29] investigated the compressive properties of an FeNiCoAlTaB high-entropy alloy using dynamic mechanical properties. After hot-rolling with a reduction ratio of 30% and aging at 600 °C for 24 h, the alloy had an average grain size of around 400 μm and a random texture. The size and volume fraction of the precipitates were 4 nm and 38%, respectively. Based on the compression true stress–true strain curves at three different strain rates, the yield strengths for strain rates of 10−3/s and 10−2/s were approximately 900 MPa and 950 MPa, respectively; there were no significant differences between the two strain rates. However, when the strain rate was 10−3/s, the yield strength was drastically increased to 1300 MPa. The high yield strength was attributed to stress-induced martensitic transformation and deformation-induced microbanding. The development of microbands leads to the development of thin-plate martensite and microbands.
Zhang et al. [26] performed a superelastic test at room temperature for both tension and compression. Moreover, a pure bending test was carried out without investigating the shape memory effect or properties via a thermal cyclic test. In addition, mechanical tests were conducted, focused on a 700 °C aging condition. Considering the previously conducted work, this study characterizes the shape memory properties of an FeNiCoAlTaB high-entropy alloy aged at 600 °C by using microstructural and thermal cyclic three-point bending tests.

2. Materials and Methods

The Fe41.265Ni28.2Co17Al11Ta2.5B0.04 (at%) high-entropy alloy (named NCATB-HEA) was synthesized via vacuum induction melting (VIM) and cast into an alloy bar. Wire electrical discharge machining (EDM) was used to cut the bar into several blocks, with each block having a length, width and thickness of 100 mm, 25 mm and 25 mm, respectively. The blocks were homogenized at 1250 °C for 24 h, followed by water quenching (WQ). The homogeneous bar was cold-rolled (CR) with a reduction ratio of 98% (CR98) to a thickness of 0.5 mm. Samples for the three-point bending test were cut from the 98% cold-rolled sheets with lengths, widths and thicknesses of 30 mm, 3 mm and 0.5 mm, respectively. Each test sample was annealed at 1300 °C for 1 h. The annealed samples were aged at 600 °C for 12 or 24 h (PXL600 °C-12 h and PXL600 °C-24 h). The three-point bending test device was a TA Q800 (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). The support span was 20 mm, and the cyclic temperature range was between 120 °C and −145 °C. Figure 1 presents the thermomechanical processing. The procedure is shown in the following:
The transformation temperatures of the NCATB-HEAs that had been aged at 600 °C for 12, 24 or 48 h were characterized using a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). Magnetic fields of 0.05 and 7 Tesla were applied, with a heating and cooling rate of 5 °C min–1. The test was conducted at −260 °C and 120 °C. The SQUID device used was an MPMS-3 (Quantum Design, San Diego, CA, USA).
The different phases or crystal structures under different thermomechanical processing conditions were measured via X-ray diffraction (XRD). The device used was a D5000 (Siemens, Aubrey, TX, USA). A range of 2 Thea was selected from 30 to 100 degrees. The microhardness after aging (600 °C for 3, 6, 12 h, 24 h or 48 h) was evaluated using a Vicker’s hardness testing machine. The hardness testing device used was an FM-310 (FUTURE-TECH CORP, Kawasaki, Japan). Optical microscopy (OM) was used to observe the microstructure of NCATB-HEA samples. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) was used to analyze the composition of the β phases and matrix in aging conditions.
To investigate the grain morphology of NCATB-HEA after different annealing times, the CR98 sample was annealed at 1300 °C for 0.5 and 1 h. The recrystallization texture and grain size of samples were obtained by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). The device was a JeoL JSM-7800F device (JEOL, Musashino, Akishima, Japan). The etching solution for preparing the EBSD samples was 90% C2H5OH and 10% HClO4. Inverse pole figures (IPFs) were used to measure the grain orientation distribution in three directions of samples: the rolling direction (RD), the normal direction (ND), and the transverse direction (TD). The orientation distribution functions (ODFs) results were plotted by selecting the {111}, {200} and {311} incomplete pole figure data. The phi2 is selected for 0, 45 and 65 degrees of the Euler space in FCC metals to understand the texture development in different thermomechanical processing. In the ODF results, f(g) is the orientation density, and f(g)max is the maximum orientation density.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Evolution of Texture in NCATB-HEA

Figure 2a,b represent the EBSD inverse pole figure images along the rolling, transverse and normal directions in NCATB-HEA (CR98) samples that have been annealed at 1300 °C for 0.5 h and 1 h, respectively. Based on these results, the maximum texture intensity is 2.45 multiples of unity distribution (MUD) for 1300 °C-0.5 h and 2.82 MUD for 1300 °C-1 h. The results indicated that no strong recrystallization texture is formed when NCATB-HEA (CR98) is annealed at 1300 °C. Interestingly, the EBSD results are different from those reported by Zhang et al. [26]. In their experiments, a strong texture is developed in the <100> orientation for the cold-rolled sample annealed at 1300 °C for 0.5 h. One possible reason for this is the difference in thermomechanical processing between the two studies. In [26], the NCATB-HEA block is first hot-rolled at 1250 °C and then cold-rolled to 97.5% [26]. In our study, the NCATB-HEA block is first solution-heat-treated at 1250 °C for 24 h and quenched in water. The homogeneous bar is then directly cold-rolled with a thickness reduction of 98%.
Figure 3a–c shows the ODFs for CR98, CR98 + 1300 °C-0.5 h and CR98 + 1300 °C-1 h, respectively, at phi2 = 0°, 45° and 65°. The ODF can be used for the quantitative analysis of texture development during different thermomechanical processes. The CR98 sample showed Goss {011}<100> texture (f(g)max = 8.98), Brass {011}<211> texture (f(g)max = 18.51), G/B {110}<115> texture (f(g)max = 8.2), S {123}<634> texture (f(g)max = 5.32), Rt-Cu {112}<011> texture (f(g)max = 2.15) and Cu {112}<111> texture (f(g)max = 2.1). The CR98 sample has a strong Brass texture. The CR98 + 1300 °C-0.5 h sample showed Goss texture (f(g)max = 3.38), Brass texture (f(g)max = 7.73), G/B texture (f(g)max = 6.96), A {110}<111> texture (f(g)max = 5.85), Cu texture (f(g)max = 2.81), Rt/G {011}<011> texture (f(g)max = 3.36, S texture (f(g)max = 4.04) and Rt-Cu texture (f(g)max = 2.2). The CR98 + 1300 °C-1 h sample showed Goss texture (f(g)max = 12.88), Brass texture (f(g)max = 10.19), G/B texture (f(g)max = 10.19), A texture (f(g)max = 11.61), Cu texture (f(g)max = 8.29), Rt/G texture (f(g)max = 4), S texture (f(g)max = 9.6). RT-C {001}<110> texture (f(g)max = 8.69) and Rt-Cu texture (f(g)max = 22.33). From the preceding ODF results, we conclude the main textures for the CR98 sample are Goss, Brass and G/B. After annealing, the f(g)max values for these three textures decrease, and different textures are formed. When the annealing time is increased from 0.5 h to 1 h, the f(g)max value of the Rt-Cu texture increases. The major texture components in this instance are Rt-Cu, Goss, Brass and G/B.

3.2. Grain Morphology in NCATB-HEA

In Fe-based SMA systems, enlarging the grain size not only decreases the number of constrained grains but also improves the recoverable strain. Based on the results from Tanaka et al. and Zhang et al. [12,26], the average grain size in the Fe-Ni-Co-Al-based system should be above 400 μm. In this study, the grain size distributions for NCATB-HEA after 98% CR when annealing at 1300 °C for 0.5 and 1 h are shown in Figure 4a,c. The average grain sizes in the samples after annealing at 1300 °C for 0.5 and 1 h are 356.8 and 504.6 μm, respectively. The results show that a large grain size can be obtained when annealing at 1300 °C for 1 h. Therefore, this annealing condition was selected for use in the hardness, SQUID, XRD, and three-point bending measurements. In addition, brittle second phases (β-NiAl) will be formed at the grain boundaries or triple junctions during the aging process. These brittle second phases are more likely to form at high-angle grain boundaries (HABs), where misorientation is greater than about 15 degrees. In contrast, low-angle grain boundaries (LABs) represent a misorientation of less than about 15 degrees. LABs are thought to reduce the generation of brittle second phases (β-NiAl). Figure 4b,d display the misorientation distribution after annealing at 1300 °C for 0.5 h and 1 h. The percentage of LABs was 5% and 3% for the 1300 °C-0.5 h and 1300 °C-1 h samples, respectively. For the FeNiCoAlTaB HEA, the LAB fraction can reach 60%; the percentage of LABs in Zhang’s report was about 25% [26]. The differences in the LAB percentages may be related to differences in the thermomechanical processing, but further study is required.

3.3. Crystal Structure in NCATB-HEA

The results from X-ray diffraction measurements of the NCATB-HEA CR98 samples under various thermomechanical processing conditions are shown in Figure 5a. The CR98 sample exhibits a diffraction peak corresponding to the (111) diffraction plane of the austenite phase (γ) with an FCC structure. The sample (annealed at 1300 °C for 1 h) shows diffraction peaks in both the (111) and (200) planes of the austenite phase. For aged samples (PXL600 °C-12 h and PXL600 °C-24 h), a new diffraction peak with a (111) diffraction plane of the precipitate (γ′) phase with an L12 structure emerged. The intensity of the new peak increased when the aging time was increased from 12 to 24 h, as shown in Figure 5b. This indicates that the increasing intensity of the precipitate peak reflects the increase in the volume fraction of the precipitates. A similar XRD result observation was reported by Zhou et al. [30]. In addition, the study by Fu et al. [18] indicated that the brittle second phases (β-NiAl) appear at around 65 degrees for FeNiCoAlNbB shape memory alloys. In the present study, a diffraction peak at 65 degrees was not detected in the PXL600 °C-12 h and PXL600 °C-24 h samples. This indicates that a small number of second phases are generated under these aging conditions. The same observation was reported by Zhang et al. [23]. They found that no obvious β phase XRD peak (around 65 degrees) is observed in NCATB-HEA samples due to the small amount of β phase. In order to further investigate the small amount of β phases, the OM and SEM were used to characterize the microstructure of NCATB-HEA samples.

3.4. Microstructure in NCATB-HEA

Figure 6a–f show the optical microscope of the NCATB-HEA in different thermomechanical processing conditions. From OM results, the CR98 sample shows blurred grain boundaries due to the large percentage of rolling reduction. Figure 6c shows the CR98 sample annealed and heat-treated at 1300 °C for 1 h. The grain boundaries are clearly observed in this condition. Figure 6d–f display the CR98 sample after annealing at 1300 °C for 1 h and aged heat treatment at 600 °C for 12, 24 and 48 h. From the microstructure results, β phases are not clearly observed for the 600 °C-12 h and 600 °C-24 h samples, and observable β phases are generated along the grain boundary until the superconducting quantum interference device aging time is increased to 48 h. Because the width of the β phases is thick compared to another alloy’s system, it is difficult to identify the β phases at the grain boundary, especially for the 600 °C-12 h and 600 °C-24 h samples. In order to further observe β phases, the SEM was carried out in three aged samples.
Figure 7a–d show the backscattered electron (BSE) image of NCATB-HEA samples under various aging conditions. Figure 7a,b present the BSE images of the 600 °C-12 h and 600 °C-24 h samples. Because the aging time is not long enough to form a large amount of β phases, only a few β phases (bright clusters) are formed along the grain boundary. When the aging time is increased to 48 h, increasing numerous β phases are formed along the grain boundaries (Figure 7d). Figure 7c shows the high magnification of the BSE image for 600 °C-24 h samples. The numbers in a figure indicate the EDS points. Numbers 1 and 2 are analyses in β phases, and Numbers 3 and 4 are analyses in matrices. The EDS result is summarized in Table 1 for the 600 °C-24 h samples. Table 2 summarizes the EDS results of the matrix for the 600 °C-12 h and 600 °C-48 h samples. Based on EDS results, the β phases (white clusters) contain high Ta content compared to the matrix. Zhang et al. [23] have found that Ta element first precipitates in the triple-junction area and then accumulates along the high-angle grain boundaries during the aging process. β phases prefer to nucleate and grow from Ta-rich regions. In this study, the width of β phase for three aging samples is less than 1 μm. Based on the OM and SEM results, the small amount of β phases generated in this alloy is due to three reasons. First, the addition of boron is effective in suppressing Ta formation at the grain boundary. Ta first precipitates along the grain boundaries, and β phases prefer to nucleate from Ta regions. If the Ta regions are decreased, the amount of β phases is small. Boron will retard the generation speed of the second phases during the aging process and results in decreasing the thickness of the β phase along grain boundaries. Moreover, the aging time is shorter than 72 h. Therefore, the aging time is not long enough to form a large amount of β phases. Additionally, grain boundary (GB) segregation can alter the mechanical properties. Tanaka et al. [31] reported that β phases reduce the yield strength of the HEA due to the facility of GB sliding. The AlCoCrFeNi HEA with Al atom segregation at GB demonstrates the GB stabilization effect; the formed elemental GB segregation of Al decreases the amount of β phase, leads to resistance to the GB sliding, and improves the yield strength.

3.5. Hardness in NCATB-HEA

Figure 8 and Table 3 represent the hardness value measurements in NCATB-HEA CR98 samples under various aging conditions. The hardness for CR98 + 1300 °C, 1 h is 270 HV. After aging at 600 °C for 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h, the hardness values are 290 HV, 300 HV, 395 HV, 350 HV and 425 HV, respectively. The hardness increases when the aging time is increased from 3 to 12 h. However, the hardness decreases as the aging time is increased from 12 to 24 h. The hardness increases again when the aging time is prolonged from 24 to 48 h. The hardness value is lower at 48 h than at 12 h. The reason for this is related to the transformation temperature. Consequently, SQUID measurements were performed on samples aged for 12, 24 and 48 h.

3.6. Transformation Temperatures in NCATB-HEA

The transformation temperatures, such as the austenite finish temperature (Af) and martensite start temperature (Ms), of NCATB-HEA under different aging conditions were characterized using superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). The transformation temperatures are shown in Figure 9a. Figure 9b–d present the magnetization vs. temperatures measured at 0.05 Tesla for NCATB-HEA aged at 600 °C for 12, 24 and 48 h. Based on this measurement, the Af and Ms values were −48 °C and −157 °C for the PXL600 °C-12 h sample, 10 °C and −145 °C for the PXL600 °C-24 h sample and −55 °C and −95 °C for the PXL600 °C-48 h sample. The relationships between the transformation temperatures (Af and Ms) and the three aging conditions are plotted in Figure 9e. The results show that the transformation temperature increases as the aging time increases from 12 to 24 h. However, the transformation temperature tends to decrease as the aging time is prolonged from 24 to 48 h. Since increasing Af should render stress-induced martensitic transformation easier at room temperature, hardness is expected to decrease as the aging duration increases. These results are in line with the results from our hardness experiments, which show that the values start to decrease from 12 to 24 h and increase from 24 to 48 h. The results for aged samples of NCATB-HEA in a strong magnetic field (7 Tesla) are shown in Figure 9f–h. The Ms and Af values of NCATB-HEA are presented in Table 4. The transformation temperatures (Af and Ms) of the three aging conditions increase as the magnetic field is increased from 0.05 to 7 Tesla, i.e., increasing the strength of the magnetic field increases the transformation temperature.
From the previous EDS results of the matrix for NCATB-HEAs that had been aged at 600 °C for 12, 24 and 48 h, the Ni concentration decreases with increasing aging times. Figure 9i summarizes the effect of aging treatment on the martensite start temperature (determined from 0.05 Tesla) and Ni content in three aging conditions. From the results, the Ni content decreases, and the martensite start temperature increases with increasing aging times. This indicates that decreasing the Ni content leads to an increase in the martensite start temperature [32]. Figure 9j shows the relation between magnification (determined from 0.05 Tesla) and Ni content. The results show that magnetization decreases with increasing aging times. As aging time increases, magnetization and Ni content both decrease.

3.7. Shape Memory Properties in NCATB-HEA

The determination of shape memory properties, such as the recoverable strain (εrec), irrecoverable strain (εirrec) and transformation temperatures (Ms and Af), of the NCATB-HEA in the three-point bending test are illustrated in Figure 10a. Figure 10b,c show three-point bending thermal cyclic tests under different constant stresses for the PXL600 °C-12 h and PXL600 °C-24 h samples, respectively. Recoverable and irrecoverable strains are plotted as the functions of applied stress in Figure 10d,e for the PXL600 °C-12 h and PXL600 °C-24 h samples, respectively. Based on these results, the maximum recoverable strain was 1.5% for PXL600 °C-12 h and 3.6% for PXL600 °C-24 h. The applied stress dependence of the transformation temperatures taken from Figure 10b,c are summarized in Figure 10f,g. The relationship between the applied stress and the transformation temperature follows the Clausius–Clapeyron relation, as follows:
d σ d T = Δ H ε t r . T 0
where dσ/dT represents the stress–temperature slope, ΔH is the change in transformation enthalpy, T0 is the equipment temperature and εtr is the transformation strain or recoverable strain. From Figure 10f,g, stress–temperature slopes of Ms and Af are 12.5 MPa/°C and 10.3 MPa/°C for PXL600 °C-12 h, respectively. For the PXL600 °C-24 h sample, the stress–temperature slope of Ms is 7.6 MPa/°C and that of Af is 6 MPa/°C. The dσ/dT is inversely proportional to the εtr. A larger slope corresponds to a smaller recoverable strain. The recoverable strain of the PXL600 °C-24 h sample is larger than that of the PXL600 °C-12 h sample. Therefore, the steep stress–temperature slope in PXL600 °C-12 h corresponds to a small recoverable strain. In another HEA system, the Ms and Af slopes for a TiHfZrCuNi HEA are 10.12 and 13.20 MPa/°C, respectively [33].

4. Conclusions

This study investigated the grain morphology, hardness, magnetic responses and shape memory responses of cold-rolled samples of an FeNiCoAlTaB high-entropy alloy. The research results are as follows:
  • EBSD revealed that the average grain size was 356.8 and 504.6 μm for 1300 °C-0.5 h and 1300 °C-1 h, respectively. Both annealing conditions showed that no strong recrystallization texture is formed in NCATB-HEA (CR98).
  • The ODF results indicate that the textural components of the cold-rolled sample are Brass, Goss and G/B. The major texture components in the sample annealed at 1300 °C for 1 h were Rt-Cu, Goss, Brass and G/B.
  • The hardness value decreases from 12 to 24 h and increases from 24 to 48 h, which is related to the transformation temperatures. The transformation temperatures increase when the aging time increases from 12 to 24 h. However, the transformation temperature tends to decrease as the aging time is prolonged from 24 to 48 h. The SQUID results match with our hardness results.
  • XRD analysis revealed that a new peak in the (111) plane of the precipitates emerged, and its intensity increased when the aging time at 600 °C was increased from 12 to 24 h.
  • The three-point bending thermal cyclic results show that samples aged at 600 °C for 12 and 24 h showed maximum recoverable strains of 2% and 3.6%, respectively. The stress–temperature slopes for the austenite finish temperatures were 10.3 MPa/°C for 12 h and 6 MPa/°C for 24 h, respectively. The slope value for PXL600 °C-12 h is higher than for PXL600 °C-24 h. The reason for this is that the higher slope value corresponds to a lower recoverable strain.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.-W.T.; methodology, L.-W.T. and C.-H.C.; validation, L.-W.T. and C.-H.C.; investigation, L.-W.T., C.-H.C., W.-C.C. and Y.-T.H.; resources, L.-W.T. and C.-H.C.; data curation, W.-C.C. and Y.-T.H.; writing—original draft preparation, L.-W.T.; writing—review and editing, L.-W.T.; visualization, L.-W.T. and C.-H.C.; supervision, L.-W.T.; project administration, L.-W.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), grant numbers NSTC 113-2221-E-018-002 and NSTC 112-2628-E-002-023-MY3.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The FeNiCoAlTaB alloys were fabricated by the National Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology (NCSIST), which is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank Ko-Kai Tseng at the High-Entropy Materials Center of National Tsing Hua University for the cold-rolling experiment. The authors would like to thank Yung-Sheng Chen at the Instrumentation Center, National Tsing Hua University, for the SQUID measurements. The authors would also like to thank Yan-Ju Hsieh at the Department of Materials and Optoelectronic Science of National Sun Yat-Sen University for the XRD experiment and the calculation, analysis and plotting of orientation distribution functions (ODFs).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yeh, J.W. Physical metallurgy of high-entropy alloys. JOM 2015, 67, 2254–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yeh, J.W.; Chen, S.K.; Lin, S.J.; Gan, J.Y.; Chin, T.S.; Shun, T.T.; Tsau, C.H.; Chang, S.Y. Nanostructured high entropy alloys with multiple principal elements: Novel alloy design concepts and outcomes. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2004, 6, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tsai, M.H.; Yeh, J.W. High-entropy alloys: A critical review. Mater. Res. Lett. 2014, 2, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yeh, J.W. Alloy Design Strategies and Future Trends in High-Entropy Alloys. JOM 2013, 65, 1759–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yeh, J.W.; Lin, S.J.; Chin, T.S.; Gan, J.Y.; Chen, S.K.; Shun, T.T.; Tsau, C.H.; Chou, S.Y. Formation of simple crystal structures in Cu-Co-Ni-Cr-Al-Fe-Ti-V alloys with multiprincipal metallic elements. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2004, 35, 2533–2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tsai, K.Y.; Tsai, M.H.; Yeh, J.W. Sluggish diffusion in Co–Cr–Fe–Mn–Ni high entropy alloys. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 4887–4897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yeh, J.W. Recent progress in high entropy alloys. Ann. Chim. Sci. Mater. 2006, 31, 633–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Z.; Pradeep, K.G.; Deng, Y.; Raabe, D.; Tasan, C.C. Metastable high-entropy dual-phase alloys overcome the strength–ductility trade-off. Nature 2016, 534, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Otto, F.; Dlouhý, A.; Pradeep, K.; Kuběnová, M.; Raabe, D.; Eggeler, G.; George, E.P. Decomposition of the single-phase high-entropy alloy CrMnFeCoNi after prolonged anneals at intermediate temperatures. Acta Mater. 2016, 112, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tasan, C.C.; Deng, Y.; Pradeep, K.G.; Yao, M.J.; Springer, H.; Raabe, D. Composition dependence of phase stability, deformation mechanisms, and mechanical properties of the CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloy system. JOM 2014, 66, 1993–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, Z.; Tasan, C.C.; Pradeep, K.G.; Raabe, D. A TRIP-assisted dual-phase high-entropy alloy: Grain size and phase fraction effects on deformation behavior. Acta Mater. 2017, 131, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tanaka, Y.; Himuro, Y.; Kainuma, R.; Sutou, Y.; Omori, T.; Ishida, K. Ferrous polycrystalline shape-memory alloy showing huge superelasticity. Science 2010, 327, 1488–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lee, D.; Omori, T.; Kainuma, R. Ductility enhancement and superelasticity in Fe–Ni–Co–Al–Ti–B polycrystalline alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 617, 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Omori, T.; Abe, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Lee, D.; Ishida, K.; Kainuma, R. Thermoelastic martensitic transformation and superelasticity in Fe–Ni–Co–Al–Nb–B polycrystalline alloy. Scr. Mater. 2013, 69, 812–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tseng, L.W.; Lee, P.Y.; Lu, N.H.; Hsu, Y.T.; Chen, C.H. Shape memory properties and microstructure of FeNiCoAlTaB shape memory alloys. Crystals 2023, 13, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tseng, L.W.; Song, M.; Chen, W.C.; Hsu, Y.T.; Chen, C.H. Superelastic Properties of Aged FeNiCoAlTaB Cold-Rolled Shape Memory Alloys. Metals 2024, 14, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ma, J.; Hornbuckle, B.; Karaman, I.; Thompson, G.B.; Luo, Z.; Chumlyakov, Y. The effect of nanoprecipitates on the superelastic properties of FeNiCoAlTa shape memory alloy single crystals. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 3445–3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fu, H.; Zhao, H.; Song, S.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, J. Evolution of the cold-rolling and recrystallization textures in FeNiCoAlNbB shape memory alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 628, 1008–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tseng, L.W.; Ma, J.; Karaman, I.; Wang, S.J.; Chumlyakov, Y. Superelastic response of the FeNiCoAlTi single crystals under tension and compression. Scr. Mater. 2015, 101, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tseng, L.W.; Chen, C.H.; Chen, W.C.; Cheng, Y.; Lu, N.H. Shape memory properties and microstructure of new iron-based FeNiCoAlTiNb shape memory alloys. Crystals 2021, 11, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chumlyakov, Y.I.; Kireeva, I.V.; Pobedennaya, P.; Krooβ, P.; Niendorf, T. Rubber-like behaviour and superelasticity of [001]-oriented FeNiCoAlNb single crystals containing γ- and β-phase particles. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 856, 158158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chumlyakov, Y.I.; Kireeva, I.V.; Kuksgauzen, I.V.; Kuksgauzen, D.A.; Niendorf, T.; Krooβ, P. Tension-compression asymmetry of the superelastic behavior of high-strength [001]-oriented FeNiCoAlNb crystals. Mater. Lett. 2021, 289, 129395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, C.; Zhu, C.; Shin, S.; Casalena, L.; Vecchio, K. Grain boundary precipitation of tantalum and NiAl in superelastic FeNiCoAlTaB alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2019, 743, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kim, M.S.; Heo, J.K.; Rodrigue, H.; Lee, H.T.; Pané, S.; Han, M.W.; Ahn, S.H. Shape memory alloy (SMA) actuators: The role of material, form, and scaling effects. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2208517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sohn, J.W.; Ruth, J.S.; Yuk, D.G.; Choi, S.B. Application of shape memory alloy actuators to vibration and motion control of structural systems: A review. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, C.; Zhu, C.; Harrington, T.; Casalena, L.; Wang, H.; Shin, S.; Vecchio, K.S. Multifunctional non-equiatomic high entropy alloys with superelastic, high damping, and excellent cryogenic properties. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2019, 21, 1800941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, C.; Yu, Q.; Tang, Y.T.; Xu, M.; Wang, H.; Zhu, C.; Ell, J.; Zhao, S.; MacDonald, B.E.; Cao, P.; et al. Strong and ductile FeNiCoAl-based high-entropy alloys for cryogenic to elevated temperature multifunctional applications. Acta Mater. 2023, 242, 118449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, C.; Wang, X.; Xu, M.; MacDonald, B.E.; Hong, R.; Zhu, C.; Dai, X.; Vecchio, K.S.; Apelian, D.; Hahn, H.; et al. Orientation-dependent superelasticity of a metastable high-entropy alloy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021, 119, 161908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, A.; Zhang, C.; Li, Z.; Wang, H.; Xu, M.; Zhu, C.; Wang, X.; Meyers, M.A.; Lavernia, E.J. Dynamic mechanical performance of FeNiCoAl-based high-entropy alloy: Enhancement via microbands and martensitic transformation. Mater. Today Adv. 2023, 20, 100439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhou, Z.; Cui, J.; Ren, X. Phase diagram of FeNiCoAlTaB ferrous shape memory alloy on aging time. AIP Adv. 2017, 7, 045019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tanaka, Y.; Kainuma, R.; Omori, T.; Ishida, K. Alloy design for Fe-Ni-Co-Al-based superelastic alloys. Mater. Today Proc. 2015, 2, S485–S492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Babicheva, R.; Jarlöv, A.; Zheng, H.; Dmitriev, S.; Korznikova, E.; Nai, M.L.S.; Ramamurty, U.; Zhou, K. Effect of short-range ordering and grain boundary segregation on shear deformation of CoCrFeNi high-entropy alloys with Al addition. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2022, 215, 111762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, S.; Cong, D.; Chen, Z.; Li, S.; Song, C.; Cao, Y.; Nie, Z.; Wang, Y. A high-entropy high-temperature shape memory alloy with large and complete superelastic recovery. Mater. Res. Lett. 2021, 9, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Illustration of the thermomechanical processes of NCATB-HEA.
Figure 1. Illustration of the thermomechanical processes of NCATB-HEA.
Materials 18 00387 g001
Figure 2. IPF maps of NCATB-HEA: (a) CR98 + 1300 °C, 0.5 h and (b) CR98 + 1300 °C, 1 h. RD, ND and TD represent the rolling direction, normal direction and transverse direction, respectively.
Figure 2. IPF maps of NCATB-HEA: (a) CR98 + 1300 °C, 0.5 h and (b) CR98 + 1300 °C, 1 h. RD, ND and TD represent the rolling direction, normal direction and transverse direction, respectively.
Materials 18 00387 g002aMaterials 18 00387 g002b
Figure 3. Orientation distribution function for phi2 = 0°, 45° and 65° in NCATB-HEA: (a) CR98, (b) CR98 + 1300 °C, 0.5 h and (c) CR98 + 1300 °C, 1 h.
Figure 3. Orientation distribution function for phi2 = 0°, 45° and 65° in NCATB-HEA: (a) CR98, (b) CR98 + 1300 °C, 0.5 h and (c) CR98 + 1300 °C, 1 h.
Materials 18 00387 g003aMaterials 18 00387 g003b
Figure 4. Grain diameter distribution and the misorientation distribution for NCATB-HEA: (a,b) CR98 + 1300 °C, 0.5 h and (c,d) CR98 + 1300 °C, 1 h.
Figure 4. Grain diameter distribution and the misorientation distribution for NCATB-HEA: (a,b) CR98 + 1300 °C, 0.5 h and (c,d) CR98 + 1300 °C, 1 h.
Materials 18 00387 g004
Figure 5. XRD results for NCATB-HEA samples under various thermomechanical processing conditions: 2 theta (a) between 30 and 100 degrees and (b) 42 and 46 degrees.
Figure 5. XRD results for NCATB-HEA samples under various thermomechanical processing conditions: 2 theta (a) between 30 and 100 degrees and (b) 42 and 46 degrees.
Materials 18 00387 g005
Figure 6. Microstructure of NCATB-HEA samples in different thermomechanical processing conditions: (a) as-received, (b) CR98, (c) CR98 + 1300 °C-1 h, (d) CR98 + 1300 °C-1 h + 600 °C-12 h, (e) CR98 + 1300 °C-1 h + 600 °C-24 h and (f) CR98 + 1300 °C-1 h + 600 °C-48 h.
Figure 6. Microstructure of NCATB-HEA samples in different thermomechanical processing conditions: (a) as-received, (b) CR98, (c) CR98 + 1300 °C-1 h, (d) CR98 + 1300 °C-1 h + 600 °C-12 h, (e) CR98 + 1300 °C-1 h + 600 °C-24 h and (f) CR98 + 1300 °C-1 h + 600 °C-48 h.
Materials 18 00387 g006
Figure 7. Backscattered electron micrograph of the NCATB-HEA aged samples: (a) 600 °C-12 h, (b) 600 °C-24 h, (d) 600 °C-48 h, and (c) high magnification at triple junction for 600 °C-24 h aged sample.
Figure 7. Backscattered electron micrograph of the NCATB-HEA aged samples: (a) 600 °C-12 h, (b) 600 °C-24 h, (d) 600 °C-48 h, and (c) high magnification at triple junction for 600 °C-24 h aged sample.
Materials 18 00387 g007aMaterials 18 00387 g007b
Figure 8. Hardness of an NCATB-HEA CR98 sample under various aging conditions.
Figure 8. Hardness of an NCATB-HEA CR98 sample under various aging conditions.
Materials 18 00387 g008
Figure 9. Magnetization–temperature (M-T) curves measured at 0.05 Tesla and 7 Tesla for NCATB-HEA under different aging conditions. (a) Demonstration of how transformation temperatures are determined via thermo-magnetic test. Field level: 0.05 Tesla for (b) 600 °C for 12 h, (c) 600 °C for 24 h and (d) 600 °C for 48 h. (e) The relationship between transformation temperatures (Af and Ms) and aging time. Field level: 7 Tesla for (f) 600 °C for 12 h, (g) 600 °C for 24 h and (h) 600 °C for 48 h. (i) Martensitic start temperatures and Ni content as a function of aging time. (j) Magnetization and Ni content as a function of aging time.
Figure 9. Magnetization–temperature (M-T) curves measured at 0.05 Tesla and 7 Tesla for NCATB-HEA under different aging conditions. (a) Demonstration of how transformation temperatures are determined via thermo-magnetic test. Field level: 0.05 Tesla for (b) 600 °C for 12 h, (c) 600 °C for 24 h and (d) 600 °C for 48 h. (e) The relationship between transformation temperatures (Af and Ms) and aging time. Field level: 7 Tesla for (f) 600 °C for 12 h, (g) 600 °C for 24 h and (h) 600 °C for 48 h. (i) Martensitic start temperatures and Ni content as a function of aging time. (j) Magnetization and Ni content as a function of aging time.
Materials 18 00387 g009aMaterials 18 00387 g009b
Figure 10. Thermal cyclic curves for the NCATB-HEA. (a) Illustration of shape memory properties: recoverable strain (εrec), irrecoverable strain (εirrec) and transformation temperatures (Ms and Af); strain vs. temperature curves measured using the three-point bending thermal cyclic test under different stress levels for (b) PXL600 °C-12 h and (c) PXL600 °C-24 h; (d,e) εrec and εirrec for both the PXL600 °C-12 h and PXL600 °C-24 h samples; (f,g) the relationship between the applied stress and transformation temperature for both the PXL600 °C-12 h and PXL600 °C-24 h samples.
Figure 10. Thermal cyclic curves for the NCATB-HEA. (a) Illustration of shape memory properties: recoverable strain (εrec), irrecoverable strain (εirrec) and transformation temperatures (Ms and Af); strain vs. temperature curves measured using the three-point bending thermal cyclic test under different stress levels for (b) PXL600 °C-12 h and (c) PXL600 °C-24 h; (d,e) εrec and εirrec for both the PXL600 °C-12 h and PXL600 °C-24 h samples; (f,g) the relationship between the applied stress and transformation temperature for both the PXL600 °C-12 h and PXL600 °C-24 h samples.
Materials 18 00387 g010aMaterials 18 00387 g010b
Table 1. The composition measurements of the 600 °C-24 h sample.
Table 1. The composition measurements of the 600 °C-24 h sample.
Elementβ PhasesMatrix
12Average34Average
Fe (at%)43.242.342.86 * ± 0.543.943.143.57 * ± 0.2
Ni (at%)26.327.426.73 * ± 0.627.228.227.67 * ± 0.2
Co (at%)16.116.616.33 * ± 0.317.21717.07 * ± 0.4
Al (at%)8.59.28.8 * ± 0.49.59.49.5 * ± 0.1
Ta (at%)5.94.65.3 * ± 0.72.22.32.2 * ± 0.1
* The standard deviations were calculated from 3 overall measurement points.
Table 2. The composition measurements of the 600 °C-12 h and 600 °C-48 h samples.
Table 2. The composition measurements of the 600 °C-12 h and 600 °C-48 h samples.
ElementMatrix (600 °C-12 h)Matrix (600 °C-48 h)
12Average34Average
Fe (at%)44.242.943.63 * ± 0.644.343.343.76 * ± 0.5
Ni (at%)27.527.927.8 * ± 0.327.227.727.4 * ± 0.3
Co (at%)16.617.616.93 * ± 0.516.717.317.13 * ± 0.4
Al (at%)9.39.49.33 * ± 0.69.59.49.4 * ± 0.1
Ta (at%)2.32.22.26 * ± 0.52.32.32.3 * ± 0.1
* The standard deviations were calculated from 3 overall measurement points.
Table 3. Hardness results for the NCATB-HEA CR98 sample.
Table 3. Hardness results for the NCATB-HEA CR98 sample.
Thermomechanical ProcessingHardness (HV)
CR98 + 1300 °C-1 h270 ± 12
CR98 + 1300 °C-1 h + 600 °C-3 h290 ± 11
CR98 + 1300 °C-1 h + 600 °C-6 h300 ± 11
CR98 + 1300 °C-1 h + 600 °C-12 h395 ± 11
CR98 + 1300 °C-1 h + 600 °C-24 h350 ± 10
CR98 + 1300 °C-1 h + 600 °C-48 h425 ± 11
Table 4. Ms and Af of NCATB-HEA.
Table 4. Ms and Af of NCATB-HEA.
Aging ConditionMagnetic FieldTransformation Temperature
600 °C-12 h0.05 TAf = −48 °C and Ms = −157 °C
600 °C-12 h7 TAf = −45 °C and Ms = −150 °C
600 °C-24 h0.05 TAf = 10 °C and Ms = −145 °C
600 °C-24 h7 TAf = 8 °C and Ms = −125 °C
600 °C-48 h0.05 TAf = −55 °C and Ms = −95 °C
600 °C-48 h7 TAf = −45 °C and Ms = −92 °C
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tseng, L.-W.; Chen, W.-C.; Hsu, Y.-T.; Chen, C.-H. Microstructure and Thermal Cyclic Behavior of FeNiCoAlTaB High-Entropy Alloy. Materials 2025, 18, 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020387

AMA Style

Tseng L-W, Chen W-C, Hsu Y-T, Chen C-H. Microstructure and Thermal Cyclic Behavior of FeNiCoAlTaB High-Entropy Alloy. Materials. 2025; 18(2):387. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020387

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tseng, Li-Wei, Wei-Cheng Chen, Yi-Ting Hsu, and Chih-Hsuan Chen. 2025. "Microstructure and Thermal Cyclic Behavior of FeNiCoAlTaB High-Entropy Alloy" Materials 18, no. 2: 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020387

APA Style

Tseng, L.-W., Chen, W.-C., Hsu, Y.-T., & Chen, C.-H. (2025). Microstructure and Thermal Cyclic Behavior of FeNiCoAlTaB High-Entropy Alloy. Materials, 18(2), 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020387

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop