Next Article in Journal
Enhancement of Biopolymer Film Properties Using Spermidine, Zinc Oxide, and Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles: A Study of Physical, Thermal, and Mechanical Characteristics
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Elemental Iron Containing Bauxite Residue Obtained After Electroreduction on High-Pressure Alkaline Leaching of Boehmitic Bauxite and Subsequent Thickening Rate
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structural and Thermal Characterization of Bluepha® Biopolyesters: Insights into Molecular Architecture and Potential Applications
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Plastic Creep Constraint in Nylon Instrument Strings

Materials 2025, 18(2), 223; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020223
by Nicolas Lynch-Aird 1,*,†, Jim Woodhouse 2,† and Claire Y. Barlow 2,†
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Materials 2025, 18(2), 223; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020223
Submission received: 2 December 2024 / Revised: 29 December 2024 / Accepted: 3 January 2025 / Published: 7 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Paper in the Section 'Polymeric Materials' (3rd Edition))

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I have the following comments regarding this article:

-          In the sub-section “2. Underlying physics of polymer behaviour” the authors comment that van der Waals forces are responsible for intermolecular interactions between polymer chains. However, in the case of nylon, much stronger hydrogen bonds, formed between amide units, play a significant role in the material's mechanical properties. These hydrogen forces are also responsible for nylon crystallization. Please include the hydrogen forces in the discussion.

 

-          The dashed line is not clearly visible in Figure 4(b).

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In this manuscript, the authors investigate the creep behavior of nylon strings under different stress cycles. The authors conducted the experiment using a relatively simple setup and provided a detailed data analysis. Overall, the manuscript is interesting; however, I have some concerns and suggestions for improvement before publication.

1.     In Figure 5, why does N28 show a negative strain?

2.     The reviewer believes that the modeling part of this study provides a sound explanation. However, another important aspect of the validity of the analysis lies in the total recoverable creep after all the stress is removed. Do the authors have any data on the strain of the string after the test? Integrating this information would better verify the validity of the modeling.

 

3.     The “crystallinity” explanation provided by the authors is somewhat difficult for the reviewer to accept. Why would the settlement of creep promote the growth of crystallinity? Common understanding suggests that crystallization is positively related to molecular alignment, which is typically enhanced when the chains are constantly under stress. Moreover, this explanation can be easily verified through a DSC experiment, which the reviewer suggests performing.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop