Next Article in Journal
Microwave-Assisted Reduction Technology for Recycling of Hematite Nanoparticles from Ferrous Sulfate Residue
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of the Evolutionary Patterns of Pore Structures and Mechanical Properties During the Hydration Process of Basalt-Fiber-Reinforced Concrete
Previous Article in Special Issue
Utilizing Chicken Egg White and L-Cysteine for Green Synthesis of Carbon Dots: Rapid and Cost-Effective Detection of Cu2+ Ions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficient Energy Transfer Down-Shifting Material for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

1
Physics Discipline, Department of Computational Sciences, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, Eastern Cape, South Africa
2
SAMRC Microbial Water Quality Monitoring Centre, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, Eastern Cape, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(14), 3213; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18143213
Submission received: 2 June 2025 / Revised: 1 July 2025 / Accepted: 2 July 2025 / Published: 8 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Luminescent Materials and Applications)

Abstract

Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are promising alternatives for power generation due to their environmental friendliness, cost effectiveness, and strong performance under diffused light. Conversely, their low spectral response in the ultraviolet (UV) region significantly obliterates their overall performance. The so-called luminescent down-shifting (LDS) presents a practical solution by converting high-energy UV photons into visible light that can be efficiently absorbed by sensitizer dyes. Herein, a conventional solid-state technique was applied for the synthesis of an LDS, europium (II)-doped barium orthosilicate (BaSiO3:Eu2+) material. The material exhibited strong UV absorption, with prominent peaks near 400 nm and within the 200–300 nm range, despite a weaker response in the visible region. The estimated optical bandgap was 3.47 eV, making it well-suited for UV absorbers. Analysis of the energy transfer mechanism from the LDS material to the N719 dye sensitizer depicted a strong spectral overlap of 2 × 10 10 M 1 c m 1 n m 4 , suggesting efficient energy transfer from the donor to the acceptor. The estimated Förster distance was approximately 6.83   n m , which matches the absorption profile of the dye-sensitizer. Our findings demonstrate the potential of BaSiO3:Eu2+ as an effective LDS material for enhancing UV light absorption and improving DSSC performance through increased spectral utilization and reduced UV-induced degradation.

1. Introduction

Solar energy, being abundant and environmental friendly, has emerged as a key alternative clean, sustainable, and renewable energy source [1,2,3]. Among various photovoltaic technologies, dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have gained substantial interest due to their low manufacturing cost, eco-friendliness, and promising performance under diffused-light conditions [4,5,6,7,8]. Despite these advantages, DSSCs continue to have drawbacks that impair their performance, especially their limited spectral response in the ultraviolet (UV) portion of the solar spectrum.
The low UV absorption by conventional dye molecules used in DSSCs, such as N719 dyes, results in underutilization of a significant portion of incident solar energy [9,10]. Therefore, high-energy UV photons can induce photodegradation of key DSSC components, such as dyes and electrolytic materials, thereby reducing both the performance and operational stability of the cells. To address these issues, researchers have explored various spectral management approaches, with luminescent down-shifting (LDS) standing out as a promising approach [11,12,13,14].
High-energy UV photons are absorbed by LDS materials and re-emitted at longer visible wavelengths, where DSSC dyes can efficiently absorb them. The efficiency and stability of DSSCs could be increased by this photon energy conversion mechanism, which also reduces UV-induced degradation and enhances the spectrum match between incident light and the dye’s absorption profile. Rare-earth-doped inorganic phosphors have gained significant attention among various LDS candidates due to their excellent photostability and tunable emission properties [15,16,17]. While it is true that DSSCs peaked in research interest over about a decade ago, recent advances have rekindled interest due to their potential in niche applications such as indoor photovoltaics, building-integrated photovoltaics, and portable devices. The main limitation of DSSCs remains their low spectral response to UV light, which spectral converters like down-shifting materials are developed to address. Therefore, our research focuses on developing cost-effective and efficient down-shifting materials to enhance the spectral responsivity of DSSCs in the UV region.
In this regard, barium orthosilicate doped with europium (II) ions (BaSiO3:Eu2+) is an interesting material for LDS. Eu2+-doped phosphors are known for their broad excitation bands in the UV region and strong emission in the visible spectrum, owing to the 4f65d1 → 4f7 electronic transitions of the Eu2+ ion [18,19,20]. BaSiO3 itself provides a robust host matrix that supports the stable incorporation of Eu2+ ions and facilitates efficient luminescence [21,22]. It is particularly suited for LDS in DSSCs due to its high UV absorbance, enabling efficient utilization of UV portion of the solar spectrum. The absorption profile of the N719 dye sensitizer matches well with the down-shifting behavior of BaSiO3:Eu2+, which exhibits a strong blue-green emission upon UV excitation. Additionally, it is easily integrated as surface or interfacial coatings due to its compatibility with DSSCs. It has a low absorption loss due to the large Stokes shift, which reduces back-absorption. Therefore, these characteristics position BaSiO3:Eu2+ as a suitable spectral converter for DSSCs.
Herein, we present the synthesis and optical and luminescent properties of the BaSiO3:Eu2+ material, evaluating its feasibility as a spectral conversion material. A conventional solid-state technique was applied for the synthesis of the material. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were employed to characterize surface morphology and elemental composition. UV–vis-diffused reflectance spectroscopy was used to estimate the optical band gap. Photoluminescent (PL) spectroscopy was utilized to analyze excitation and emission spectra and Förster theory to quantify the energy transfer efficiency through overlap integral and Förster distance estimation. Barium orthosilicate-doped europium (II) ions demonstrated a strong absorption profile within the UV range, with an estimated optical bandgap of 3.47 eV, making it suitable for UV-absorbing down-shifting material for DSSCs. The distance between the donor and acceptor molecules as well as the strength of the spectral overlap determined the efficiency of the energy transfer. The energy transfer mechanism demonstrated a strong integral overlap, i.e., J λ , between the LDS donor material and the N719 dye acceptor molecules, with an estimated value of 2 × 10 10   M 1 c m 1 n m 4 . The distance between these entities was <10 nm, indicating efficient energy transfer. The novelties of the study include the presented quantitative analysis of energy transfer efficiency via Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), including direct numerical estimation of spectral overlap integral J ( λ ) and the Förster distance (R0), which have never been reported. Therefore, by analyzing the luminescent behavior of the phosphor and spectral overlap J λ with typical a DSSC N719 dye absorption profile, the study aims to assess its potential to improve the spectral responsivity and ultimately the photovoltaic performance of DSSCs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Procedure

Barium carbonate (BaCO3), 99.99%; silicon dioxide (SiO2), 99.99%; and europium oxide (Eu2O3), 99.99%, all analytically graded from the Sigma-Aldrich—Merck Group, Johannesburg, South African division, were used as the starting materials during the preparation of the sample.
The europium (II)-doped barium silicate material Ba(1−x)SiO3:xEu2+ (x = 0.03) was prepared by the conventional solid-state method. This value of concentration was selected to avert concentration quenching. Higher doping concentration may cause non-radiative energy losses due to much ion clustering, whereas lower levels may result in insufficient luminescent intensity for an effective down-shifting process. Initially, the starting materials were weighted according to the nominal stoichiometry of Ba0.97SiO3:0.03Eu2+ phosphor, and then, the powders were mixed and milled thoroughly using a mortar and pestle. The chemical reaction that governed the stoichiometry calculation was
2BaCO3 + 2SiO2 + 2Eu2O3 → 2Ba1−xSiO3:xEu2+ + 2CO2 + 3O2
The ground sample was placed in an alumina crucible and subsequently annealed at 800 °C for 4 h in a vacuum using a tube furnace—Chengyi instrument, Zhengzhou, China. After re-grinding, the sample was sintered to 1200 °C for 4 h under an H2-reducing atmosphere at approximately 100 standard cubic centimeters per minute (SCCM), in the same instrument. A reducing hydrogen atmosphere allows and favors stabilization of Eu2+ over Eu3+. The nominal compound was obtained after cooling down of the programmable furnace. The solid-state synthesis route applied is shown in Figure 1 below.
Microstructural analysis was performed to study the surface morphologies of the phosphors using the scanning electron microscope (SEM) model JSM-7800F—JOEL Limited, Tokyo, Japan with an electron beam voltage of 5.0 keV and further equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDS) for elemental identification. A UV–vis spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer LAMDA 35)—PerkinElmer Incorporated, Waltham, MA, USA was used for the analysis of diffuse reflectance, from which the absorbance spectrum and the absorption edge for band gap estimation were determined. Photoluminescent (PL) emission was performed using the Cary Eclipse Spectrophotometer—Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA and the quantum yield measurement was carried out using the FLS980 spectrometer—Edinburgh Instruments, Scotland, UK. All characterizations were performed at room temperature, and all plots were created using Python 3.9.

2.2. Optical Band Gap Estimation

The optical band gap is the minimum photon energy required to promote an electron from the valence band to the conduction band, which can be determined from the reflectance or absorbance spectra [23,24]. In this regard, we recall that photon energy (E) is related to the wavelength (λ) as represented by Equation (1).
E = h c λ
where Planck’s constant (h) = 4.136 × 10−15 eV.s, and the speed of light (c) = 3 × 108 m/s. As E 1 λ therefore, increasing photon energy implies decreasing the wavelength. With respect to the reflectance (R), normalization is crucial to scale the reflectance data to the [0, 1] range. This is to mitigate amplitude-based effects in derivative analysis in order to realize a unity peak of the reflectance spectrum. The normalization technique applied is depicted in Equation (2).
R n o r m = R R m i n R m a x R m i n
Computation of the first derivative of the normalized reflectance with respect to the photon energy d R d E is also crucial to highlight inflection points corresponding to rapid changes in reflectance, which indicate electronic transition from the valence band to conduction band [25,26]. Since R is a function of the wavelength, we can obtain d R d E by
d R d E = d R d λ . d λ d E
Recall the relationship between wavelength and photon energy
λ = h c E
A derivative of the wavelength with respect to photon energy yields
d λ d E = h c E 2
Substituting Equation (5) into Equation (3) gives
d R d E = h c E 2 . d R d λ
Band gap energy E g can then be estimated by the value where d R d E reaches its maximum, which is the energy corresponding to the maximum first derivative. This expression is shown in Equation (7). The derivative-based approach provides a computationally efficient method to estimate optical band gaps from reflectance spectra as a function of wavelength, which represents a useful tool in exploratory material analysis.
E g = a r g m a x d R d E

2.3. Estimation of Overlap Integral and Förster Distance

In order to enable efficient energy transfer, there must be a spectral overlap between the emission spectrum of the donor and the absorption spectrum of the acceptor [27,28,29]. The overlap integral J λ   ( M 1 c m 1 n m 4 ) is governed by Equation (8) below.
J λ = 0 F D λ ϵ A ( λ ) λ 4 d λ
where F D is the normalized emission spectrum of the donor, which is a dimensionless entity; ϵ A is the molar absorption or extinction coefficient of the acceptors—a measure of how strongly chemical species absorb light at a particular wavelength in M 1 c m 1 ; λ is the wavelength of the incident light in nm.
The distance between donor and acceptor molecules as well as the strength of the overlap integral determines the efficiency of the energy transfer. Therefore, the smaller the distance between the donor and the acceptor molecules and the larger the overlap integral, the greater the efficiency of the energy transfer. A convenient way to express the J-overlap integral is in terms of the Förster distance, which is the distance at which energy transfer efficiency via Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) is 50%. The efficiency of energy transfer via FRET can be generally expressed as in Equation (9) [30]. FRET is a non-radiative process through which energy is transferred from the donor (LDS material) to the acceptor (N719 dye molecules) via dipole–dipole interaction.
η F R E T R 0 R 6
where R is the distance between the donor and the acceptor molecules, and R 0 is the Förster distance at which the energy transfer efficiency is 50%. Equation (10) expresses the Förster distance in Angstrom ( Å ) [30].
R 0 = c k 2 n 4 Q Y J ( λ ) 1 / 6
k 2 is given as 2/3, which represents the relative orientation of the transition dipoles of the donors and acceptors; Q Y is the quantum yield of the donor in the absence of the acceptor—in this case a value of 0.27; n is the refractive index of the medium containing the donor and acceptor molecules, which is 1.33; J ( λ ) is the overlap integral between the donor and acceptor molecules; c is a numerical coefficient of value 0.211 M 1 / 6 c m 1 / 6 n m 1 / 3 . Table 1 shows the computed FRET parameters.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. SEM Analysis

SEM is essential for morphological analysis of the material. As depicted in Figure 2a, the surface morphology of the material shows that the sample has particle sizes of non-uniform accumulation. The surface of the sample shows irregular shapes, and this means the distribution of the particle sizes is rough and non-homogenous. The sample presents a layered and slightly flaky structure with substantial surface roughness due to the presence of rough distributed nanoparticles. The primary phase of barium orthosilicate naturally tends to form plate-like or granular morphologies based on the solid-state technique applied during synthesis of the material.
A rough and highly faceted surface morphology is advantageous for enhancing the overall phosphor emission intensity, which is beneficial for DSSCs applications [31,32]. It significantly increases the available surface area for dye molecule adsorption. Further, such a morphology promotes enhanced light scattering due to microstructural surface roughness, which improves photon absorption by redirecting incident light within the photo-anode layer. These properties suggest that the barium orthosilicate phosphor can serve effectively as a light management material in DSSC designs.
The particle size distribution of barium orthosilicate nanoparticles, centered on a mean diameter of around 54.6 nm, as shown in Figure 2b, presents several advantages for DSSCs applications. The histogram was analyzed using a Landau distribution function because it is more suitable to account for the asymmetry and positive skew effects observed in the nanoparticle size distribution. It illustrates a relatively narrow and unimodal distribution, with the majority of particles falling within the 40–80 nm range and a peak frequency in the 50–60 nm interval. The slight positive skew in the distribution, with a small number of particles exceeding 100 nm, may further assist in scattering light efficiently, as such observed particle size and roughness could promote photon absorption. This well-controlled size distribution is indicative of a consistent synthesis process. Nanoparticles with mean diameter around 54.6 nm offer a good balance between surface area and optical functionality. Smaller particles provide a high surface area for dye adsorption, which is essential for maximizing light-harvesting efficiency [33,34]. Therefore, while some larger particles are present, their lower frequency distribution suggests they are unlikely to significantly hinder charge transport.

3.2. EDS Analysis

The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) spectrum of the barium orthosilicate sample provides valuable insights into the elemental composition and verifies the effective synthesis of the intended doped phosphor material. As shown in Figure 3, the prominent peaks in the spectrum correspond to the barium (Ba), silicon (Si), oxygen (O), and europium (Eu), all of which are anticipated elements in the compound. Multiple strong peaks attributed to barium are observed at approximately 0.7 keV, 4 keV, 4.5 keV, 5.2 keV, and 5.7 keV, which align with the Ba Lα and Lβ emission lines. This shows that barium is a major constituent, as expected from the BaSiO3 matrix. A peak for silicon is visible around 1.75 keV, consistent with the presence of silicon from the orthosilicate (SiO4) structure. Additionally, a distinct peak at approximately 0.5 keV confirms the presence of oxygen, which is a crucial constituent of the oxide network. Europium was also detected through several small peaks ranging between 1.1 keV and 7.5 keV. These are characteristic of Eu M and L emission lines. Although Eu was present in a low concentration (3 mol%), the sensitivity of EDS enables its detection, indicating that the doping process was effective. The presence of europium peaks confirms that Eu2+ ions were effectively integrated into the host lattice, thereby substituting for Ba2+ due to their similar ionic radii.
The elemental composition supports the formation of a pure and stable BaSiO3:Eu2+ matrix. The BaSiO3:Eu2+ phosphors are widely reported in the literature [35,36] to possess good thermal and chemical stability, suggesting long-term structural reliability. As a wide bandgap material, the host can act as an efficient light-scattering layer when deposited over traditional photoanodes like TiO2. Meanwhile, the incorporation of Eu2+ brings photoluminescent properties into play. Eu2+ ions are known to absorb UV light and re-emit it in the visible spectrum [37,38], making the phosphor a down-shifting material for DSSCs applications. This approach leverages the energy transfer mechanism from the BaSiO3:Eu2+ donor to dye molecules, where absorbed UV photons are converted into visible emissions, which can be absorbed more efficiently by the dye to enhance spectral utilization and reduce UV-induced degradation.

3.3. Optical Analysis

The diffused reflectance spectrum of BaSiO3:Eu2+ is presented in Figure 4. The sample shows high reflectivity in the range 410–800 nm and low reflectivity below 400 nm. This shows that within the visible and near infrared ranges, the reflectivity of the sample was high but dropped significantly in the UV region. The decrease in the reflectance spectrum in UV region can be attributed to the luminescent down-shifting properties of the BaSiO3:Eu2+ material in absorbing photons of short wavelength, typically within the UV region, and re-emitting them within the visible region due to the 4f → 5d dipole allowing electronic transition of the Eu2+ ions. The BaSiO3:Eu2+, being a good absorber of radiant UV photons, can be applied as a UV light-harvesting material to capture and convert the unused UV radiation in optoelectronic devices such as dye-sensitized solar cells [39,40,41]. This enhances the power output and overall performance of the device. Moreover, there is a high reflectivity of barium orthosilicate doped with europium (II) in the visible region of the solar spectrum, while the typical dyes such as N719 and organic dyes have strong absorption in the visible region. Therefore, due to its high reflectance in the visible region, BaSiO3:Eu2+ is not intended to act as a standalone top coating but can be more effectively utilized as an embedded or interfacial luminescent layer that selectively absorbs UV without interfering with visible light transmission. Also, BaSiO3:Eu2+ may not be applied as a replacement of the dye molecules but can serve as a co-sensitizer to the dyes in order to extend the absorption profile to the UV region and promote the generation of charge carriers and electron transport to the external circuit.
Barium orthosilicate material, as demonstrated by its absorbance spectrum, exhibits strong UV absorption with a prominent peak around 400 nm and a secondary peak between 200–300 nm, as shown in Figure 5. This makes it well-suited for application as a UV-absorbing down-shifting material in DSSCs. The core function of a down-shifting material is to absorb high-energy UV photons and re-emit them at lower-energy visible wavelengths via energy transfer mechanism [42,43]. In this case, the Eu2+ ions doped into the BaSiO3 host enable this conversion via efficient 5d → 4f electronic dipole allowed transitions, producing visible emission that can be more effectively utilized by the dye molecules in a DSSC.
In DSSCs, UV light is not efficiently absorbed by conventional dye, and prolonged UV exposure can lead to degradation of both dyes and electrolytes, reducing device longevity. Incorporating a down-shifting layer such as BaSiO3:Eu2+ can address this limitation. This is via an energy transfer mechanism by absorbing harmful UV radiation and re-emitting it in the visible range. The approach not only enhances the spectral response of the device but also improves its stability. Also, the silicate host matrix is chemically and thermally stable [36,44], which is crucial for maintaining long-term performance under continuous solar exposure. Further, the down-shifting mechanism does not interfere with the internal photo-electrochemical processes of the DSSC due to strong overlap between BaSiO3:Eu2+ and the dye molecules in the DSSCs, allowing for seamless integration. This active approach to enhancing efficiency and protecting the cell materials makes BaSiO3:Eu2+ a practical and effective addition.
The band gap estimation using the first derivative of diffused reflectance is shown in Figure 6. The maximum marks the limit or peak of a material, which occurs at a wavelength where the energy of the absorbed photon corresponds to the electronic transition from the valence band to the conduction band. A point at the abscissa where the peak intersects with the photon energy axis yields the bandgap of the material. In this case, the absorption edge appears to intersect around 3.47 eV, which is a reasonable estimate for the direct band gap of BaSiO3:Eu2+ material, and positions this material in the UV region of the electromagnetic spectrum [45]. For DSSCs, this band gap indicates that BaSiO3:Eu2+ material is not suitable as a primary light absorber or photo-anode material, as it does not effectively absorb visible light where the solar spectrum is most intense. However, this band gap makes the material very effective at absorbing UV radiation, aligning with its potential application as a down-shifting material.
As discussed in conjunction with the absorbance and reflectance spectra, BaSiO3:Eu2+ can absorb UV photons and re-emit them as visible light through the characteristics 5d → 4f electronic transitions of Eu2+ ions. Via the energy transfer mechanism, the emitted visible light can then be absorbed by the dye molecules in DSSCs such as ruthenium N719 or organic dyes, which are most effective in the 400–700 nm range [46,47,48]. Therefore, the 3.47 eV band gap reinforces the role of BaSiO3:Eu2+ as a spectral converter that enhances DSSC performance indirectly. It protects the cell from UV degradation and boosts performance by converting unused UV light into usable visible light.

3.4. Photoluminescent Analysis

Photoluminescence is the emission of light from a material upon excitation by photons, and its spectra can provide insights into energy-level transitions within the material. A material under photo-excitation would have its electrons moved to the allowed excited states. The electrons are in the process of returning to the ground state emit energy, which may include the emission of light (luminescent/radiative process) or may not (non-radiative process). While recording the photoluminescence, both the excitation and emission spectra were scanned. A variation of the signal/intensity with wavelength, time, or other variables may be observed in the system, depending on the nature of the variable.
The photoluminescence excitation (PLE) and emission (PL) spectra of the phosphor material are shown in Figure 7a. The excitation spectrum was recorded by monitoring emission at 511 nm, revealing a broad absorption band peaking at 371 nm, while the emission spectrum under 371 nm excitation shows a prominent emission centered at 511 nm. The PLE spectrum presents a broad absorption band from approximately 300–460 nm and centered at 371 nm. This can be attributed to the electronic dipole allowed 4f7 → 4f65d1 transition of BaSiO3: Eu2+ ions [49,50]. Broad emission centered at around 511 nm corresponds to the 4f65d1 → 4f7 transition, which is a characteristic of Eu2+ ions. The Eu3+ would instead show sharp line emissions due to f → f transitions, which in this case are not represented in our spectra. The Stokes shift ( λ ) was calculated to be greater than 100 nm from the peak of the excitation spectrum (excitation wavelength: 371 nm) to the peak of the emission spectrum (emission wavelength: 511 nm). This indicates a broad and strong band spectrum in the visible region, showing there is less chance of the emitted light being re-absorbed by the material itself, which helps reduce energy loss. Since DSSCs do not efficiently absorb the UV light, material like BaSiO3:Eu2+ can effectively capture the UV/blue light and re-emit it as green light—which can then be absorbed by the dye molecules of DSSCs. The photoluminescent analysis positioned BaSiO3:Eu2+ as a UV-absorbing down-shifting material, suitable for DSSC applications. Through the mechanism of energy transfer, the absorbed UV photons are re-emitted to the visible wavelengths for better utilization in DSSC devices.
Figure 7b shows the quantum yield of the BaSiO3:Eu2+ with the reference. Emission spectra of both the reference and the sample were measured under the same 371 nm excitation, and the ratio of the integrated emission with respect to the integrated excitation was used to determine the quantum yield of the material. The fluorescence emission spectrum of the material and the excitation spectrum of the reference were collected using an integrating sphere. The quantum yield of the BaSiO3:Eu2+ was determined to be 0.27. This value was used to estimate the spectral overlap integral via Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET).
The CIE (Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage—International Commission on Illumination) 1931 chromaticity diagram, as shown in Figure 8, was used to identify the excitation and emission color of the barium orthosilicate doped with europium (II) from the photoluminescent emission spectra. The diagram gives an understanding of how the material interacts with light in terms of color, for example, what kind of light it absorbs and emits. The excitation color of the BaSiO3:Eu2+ was deep blue violet at the corner of the (x = 0.15405, y = 0.02969) coordinate, while the emission color was found to be within the green region at the corner of the (x = 0.16875, y = 0.5513) coordinate, showing that after absorbing energy, the material emitted green-colored light. In this context, the CIE 1931 diagram was used primarily to visualize the wavelength shift and qualitatively illustrates the shift from UV excitation to visible green emission. It can be seen from the CIE diagram that the BaSiO3:Eu2+ has shifted its wavelength from the blue UV region to the visible green region of the diagram, thereby demonstrating the luminescent down-shifting ability of the material in absorbing photons of short wavelengths within the UV and re-emitting them at longer wavelength of the visible region. When integrated into the DSSCs, the material could extend the absorption spectrum of the devices to UV to capture and convert incidence irradiation into usable energy [51,52], hence enhancing the light-harvesting capacity of the devices to mitigate recombination losses and promote generation of charge carriers, which could improve the power conversion efficiency of DSSCs.

3.5. Energy Transfer Mechanism

Energy transfer from the luminescent material to the N719 dye molecules primarily occurs via Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). FRET is a process where energy is transferred from the donor (LDS material) to the acceptor (dye molecules), mediated by the dipole–dipole interactions [53,54,55]. The mechanism is very much dependent on the distance between the donor and the acceptor, usually occurring over the range of 1–10 nm. Figure 9 shows the mechanism by which the donor electrons transition from the ground state (L0) to the excited state (L1). Non-radiative transition occurs within the lower level of the excited state, which could be attributed to the phonon. Thereafter, emission and energy transfer to the acceptor molecules via FRET mediation. The excited molecules transition from the excited state to the ground state, which necessitates continuous energy transfer.
The distance between the donor and the acceptor molecules as well as the strength of the overlap integral determines the efficiency of energy transfer. In other words, the smaller the distance between the donor and the acceptor molecules and the larger the strength of the overlap integral, the greater the efficiency of the energy transfer. FRET spectral integral between the emission spectrum of BaSiO3:Eu2+ and the absorption spectrum of the N719 dye molecules is depicted in Figure 10. A strong overlap was achieved between the phosphor material and the dye molecules, and an estimated spectral overlap integral J ( λ ) value of 2 × 10 10 M 1 c m 1 n m 4 was realized. This value is large enough, indicating an efficient energy transfer process [29,55]. J ( λ ) was computed by integrating the emission spectrum of the donor and the absorption spectrum of the acceptor and weighted to the fourth power of the wavelength, as depicted in Equation (4). The integration was performed numerically in Python 3.9 using the Simpson’s rule across the spectral overlap region. The high J ( λ ) value was due to the significant overlap in the approximate 460–560 nm range shown in Figure 10. The BaSiO3:Eu2+ material facilitated the energy transfer mechanism, which emphasizes the importance of the luminescent down-shifting material in the development of efficient energy transfer systems. The computed FRET parameters are shown in Table 1.
Moreover, the N719 dye could not absorb the UV radiation in the range around 200–350 nm, and the UV absorption in this region dwindled evanescently, which could cause thermal losses of charge carriers by high-energy photons in the region and could be detrimental to the overall DSSC performance due to degradation of the dye molecules by prolonged high-energy UV exposure. The BaSiO3:Eu2+ material, being an efficient UV absorber, is capable of absorbing photons within this UV region and re-emitting them to the visible wavelength range, where N719 dye molecules can easily absorb them to facilitate even more generation of charge carriers. However, the LDS material not only enhances the absorption of the unused UV photons but also renders protection of the DSSC device against harmful UV exposure.
FRET efficiency as a function of distance between the donor and the acceptor molecules is depicted as shown in Figure 11 below. It can be deduced that the FRET efficiency decreases as the distance between the donor and the acceptor increases, which demonstrates that FRET is always effective at a typically close distance. R 0 = 6.83 n m indicates the participation of FRET mechanism, which falls within the range 1–10 nm. Therefore, at a distance of 6.83 nm, the energy transfer between the donor, BaSiO3:Eu2+, and the acceptor, the N719 dye, would be 50% efficient. Estimation of R 0 was computed from the relationship governing the Förster distance, the quantum yield of the donor in the absence of the acceptor, the spectra overlap between the donor and acceptor molecules, the refractive index of the medium containing the donor and the acceptor molecules, and the relative orientation of the transition dipoles of the donor and acceptor—depicted as shown in Equation (6).
Generally, the development of an efficient energy transfer system is strongly dependent on the Förster distance between the donor and acceptor molecules as well as the strength of the spectra overlap integral between the donor and acceptor. A system with a Förster distance below 10 nm and a strong overlap between the donor and the acceptor molecules would produce efficient energy transfer. This mechanism in DSSC would facilitate generation of charge carriers that would promote the power output and the overall performance of the device.

4. Conclusions

This research presents the synthesis and optical, photoluminescent, and energy transfer analysis of barium orthosilicate doped with europium (II) (BaSiO3:Eu2+) as a luminescence down-shifting (LDS) material for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). The material’s strong ultraviolet (UV) absorption and broad visible emission indicate its suitability in converting high-energy UV photons into lower-energy ones compatible with typical DSSC sensitizers such as N719. In this study, the material was synthesized via conventional solid-state technique. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis revealed non-uniform particle distribution advantageous for enhanced light scattering in the DSSCs. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) provided valuable insight into the elemental composition of synthesized material, which confirms the crystal formation of BaSiO3:Eu2+.
Photoluminescent analysis depicted a strong broadband absorption in the UV region, and the Stokes shift was calculated to be greater than 100 nm, which indicates strong emission in the visible region of the solar spectrum, suggesting reduced self-absorption losses. Quantitative analysis based on Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) yielded a Förster distance of 6.83 nm. A strong overlap was realized between the BaSiO3:Eu2+ donor and the N719 dye acceptor, and the spectral overlap integral was estimated to be 2 × 10 10 M 1 c m 1 n m 4 , which is significant for facilitating efficient energy transfer. These attributes highlight BaSiO3:Eu2+ as a viable LDS material that can improve DSSC performance through extending the absorption profile of DSSC to the UV region to facilitate enhanced device performance.
The material’s optimization and integration into photovoltaic devices could play a vital role in meeting the global energy demands and environmental goals, proving beneficial for generations to come. Although this research presented the spectral compatibility and energy transfer potential of BaSiO3:Eu2+ with N719 dyes, experimental integration with actual devices under operational conditions remains crucial, and we clearly acknowledge this limitation. However, this will be the focus of our future studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.H.O. and N.L.L.; methodology, E.H.O.; software, E.H.O.; validation, E.H.O., N.L.L., and P.M.; formal analysis, E.H.O.; investigation, E.H.O.; resources, N.L.L.; data curation, E.H.O.; writing—original draft, E.H.O.; writing—review and editing, N.L.L.; visualization, E.H.O.; supervision, N.L.L. and P.M.; project administration, N.L.L.; funding acquisition, N.L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Technology Innovation Agency Seed Fund of the department of research and innovation, South Africa. It was also supported by the Research Niche Area (RNA), Renewable Energy Wind in Research Partnerships and Innovation, Postgraduate Studies and Postdoctoral Fellowships, University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the South African Medical Research Council for funding support (SAMRC—UFH—P790) at the SAMRC Microbial Water Quality Monitoring Centre.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
EDSEnergy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
DSSCsDye-sensitized solar cells
FRETFörster resonance energy transfer
LDSLuminescent down-shifting
SEMScanning electron microscope
UVUltraviolet

References

  1. Maka, A.O.; Alabid, J.M. Solar energy technology and its roles in sustainable development. Clean Energy 2022, 6, 476–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hosseini, S.E.; Wahid, M.A. Hydrogen from solar energy, a clean energy carrier from a sustainable source of energy. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 44, 4110–4131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Onah, E.H.; Lethole, N.L.; Mukumba, P. Luminescent Materials for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Advances and Directions. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. O’Regan, B.; Grätzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Son, M.-K.; Seo, H. Effect of Ultraviolet Radiation on the Long-Term Stability of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Electron. Mater. Lett. 2020, 16, 556–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kamat, P.V. Meeting the clean energy demand: Nanostructure architectures for solar energy conversion. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 18737–18753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hagfeldt, A.; Boschloo, G. Dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6595–6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Onah, E.H.; Lethole, N.; Mukumba, P. Optoelectronic Devices Analytics: MachineLearning-Driven Models for Predicting the Performance of a Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell. Electronics 2025, 14, 1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ho, W.-J.; Shen, Y.-T.; Liu, J.-J.; You, B.-J.; Ho, C.-H. Enhancing photovoltaic performance using broadband luminescent down-shifting by combining multiple species of Eu-doped silicate phosphors. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hosseini, Z.; Taghavinia, N.; Diau, E.W.-G. Luminescent Spectral Conversion to Improve the Performance of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chemphyschem 2017, 18, 3292–3308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ju, T.; Li, Z. An Updated Review for Performance Enhancement of Solar Cells by Spectral Modification. Energies 2024, 17, 4492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rehman, A.U.; Aslam, M.; Khan, M.; Shahid, I.; Siddiq, A.; Iqbal, M.A.; Ahmed, S. Enhancing the photovoltaic performance of solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells with composite materials and luminescent down-shifting. J. Electron. Mater. 2020, 49, 6292–6299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hosseini, Z.; Huang, W.-K.; Tsai, C.-M.; Chen, T.-M.; Taghavinia, N.; Diau, E.W.-G. Enhanced light harvesting with a reflective luminescent down-shifting layer for dye-sensitized solar cells. Acs Appl. Mater. Inter. 2013, 5, 5397–5402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, F.; Wang, Y.; Yusoff, A.R.B.M.; Yu, Y.; Gao, P. Unlocking the Potential of Rare Earth-Doped Down-Conversion Materials for Enhanced Solar Cell Performance and Durability. Solar RRL 2025, 9, 2400798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rajeswari, R.; Islavath, N.; Raghavender, M.; Giribabu, L. Recent progress and emerging applications of rare earth doped phosphor materials for dye-sensitized and perovskite solar cells: A review. Chem. Rec. 2020, 20, 65–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sehgal, P.; Narula, A.K. Improved optical, electrochemical and photovoltaic properties of dye-sensitized solar cell composed of rare earth-doped zinc oxide. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 16612–16622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Terraschke, H.; Wickleder, C. UV, blue, green, yellow, red, and small: Newest developments on Eu2+-doped nanophosphors. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 11352–11378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Parauha, Y.R.; Shirbhate, N.S.; Dhoble, S.J. Color-tunable luminescence by energy transfer mechanism in RE (RE = Eu2+, Tb3+)–doped Na2SrPO4F phosphors. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2022, 33, 15333–15345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lastusaari, M.; Jungner, H.; Kotlov, A.; Laamanen, T.; Rodrigues, L.C.; Brito, H.F.; Hölsä, J. Understanding persistent luminescence: Rare-earth-and Eu2+-doped Sr2MgSi2O7. Z. Für Naturforschung B 2014, 69, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jia, Y.; Sun, W.; Pang, R.; Ma, T.; Li, D.; Li, H.; Zhang, S.; Fu, J.; Jiang, L.; Li, C. Sunlight activated new long persistent luminescence phosphor BaSiO3: Eu2+, Nd3+, Tm3+ Optical properties and mechanism. Mater. Des. 2016, 90, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Imran, M.; Rafiq, Q.; Rahman, A.U.; Azam, S. First-principles calculations of optoelectronic characteristics of Eu3+ & Tb3+ doped BaSiO3 for energy renewable devices applications. Comput. Condens. Matter 2024, 40, e00944. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sangiorgi, N.; Aversa, L.; Tatti, R.; Verucchi, R.; Sanson, A. Spectrophotometric method for optical band gap and electronic transitions determination of semiconductor materials. Opt. Mater. 2017, 64, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mannino, G.; Deretzis, I.; Smecca, E.; La Magna, A.; Alberti, A.; Ceratti, D.; Cahen, D. Temperature-dependent optical band gap in CsPbBr3, MAPbBr3, and FAPbBr3 single crystals. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 2490–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nguyen, T.D.; Huang, C.; Tsilomelekis, G.; Celik, F.E. Differential Diffuse Reflectance Spectral Calculation of Crystalline Composition and Bandgap Energy in Metal Oxides Mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. C 2024, 128, 18051–18062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zanatta, A.R. Revisiting the optical bandgap of semiconductors and the proposal of a unified methodology to its determination. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Langhals, H. Determination of the Overlap Between UV Absorption Spectrum and Fluorescence Spectrum. University of Munich Repository. 2022. Available online: https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93849/1/3698_engl.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2025).
  27. Albinsson, B.; Mårtensson, J. Long-range electron and excitation energy transfer in donor–bridge–acceptor systems. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2008, 9, 138–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sreenath, K.; Yi, C.; Knappenberger, K.L.; Zhu, L. Distinguishing Förster resonance energy transfer and solvent-mediated charge-transfer relaxation dynamics in a zinc (II) indicator: A femtosecond time-resolved transient absorption spectroscopic study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 5088–5092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lakowicz, J.R.R. Principles of Fluorzescence Spectroscopy; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sengupta, D.; Das, P.; Mondal, B.; Mukherjee, K. Effects of doping, morphology and film-thickness of photo-anode materials for dye sensitized solar cell application–A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 60, 356–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Low, F.W.; Lai, C.W. Recent developments of graphene-TiO2 composite nanomaterials as efficient photoelectrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 103–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Joseph, I.; Louis, H.; Unimuke, T.; Etim, I.; Orosun, M.; Odey, J. An overview of the operational principles, light harvesting and trapping technologies, and recent advances of the dye sensitized solar cells. Appl. Sol. Energy 2020, 56, 334–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Song, W.; Gong, Y.; Tian, J.; Cao, G.; Zhao, H.; Sun, C. Novel photoanode for dye-sensitized solar cells with enhanced light-harvesting and electron-collection efficiency. Acs Appl. Mater. Inter. 2016, 8, 13418–13425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Katyayan, S.; Agrawal, S. CaSiO3: Eu2+, Er3+, BaSiO3: Eu2+, Er3+ and SrSiO3: Eu2+, Er3+ phosphors: Molten salt synthesis, optical and thermal studies. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 8472–8480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. ALOthman, Z.A. A review: Fundamental aspects of silicate mesoporous materials. Materials 2012, 5, 2874–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Farzaneh, A.; Abdi, M.R. CsI nanocrystal doped with Eu2+ ions for radiation detection. J. Lumin. 2018, 194, 424–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, Y.; Van Steen, J.; Van Krevel, J.; Botty, G.; Delsing, A.; DiSalvo, F.; De With, G.; Hintzen, H. Luminescence properties of red-emitting M2Si5N8: Eu2+ (M= Ca, Sr, Ba) LED conversion phosphors. J. Alloys Compd. 2006, 417, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zheng, D.; Yang, X.; Čuček, L.; Wang, J.; Ma, T.; Yin, C. Revolutionizing dye-sensitized solar cells with nanomaterials for enhanced photoelectric performance. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 464, 142717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mehra, S.; Bishnoi, S.; Jaiswal, A.; Jagadeeswararao, M.; Srivastava, A.K.; Sharma, S.N.; Vashishtha, P. A review on spectral converting nanomaterials as a photoanode layer in dye-sensitized solar cells with implementation in energy storage devices. Energy Storage 2020, 2, e120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Benetti, D.; Rosei, F. Alternative uses of luminescent solar concentrators. Nanoenergy Adv. 2022, 2, 222–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gabr, A. Modelling and Characterization of Down-Conversion and Down-Shifting Processes for Photovoltaic Applications. Ph.D. Thesis, Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  42. Nowsherwan, G.A.; Khan, M.; Nowsherwan, N.; Ikram, S.; Hussain, S.S.; Naseem, S.; Riaz, S. Emerging trends in lanthanide-based upconversion and downconversion material for PSCs & DSSCs. J. Mater. Sci. 2024, 59, 16411–16448. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhu, Y.; Liang, Y.; Liu, S.; Li, H.; Chen, J.; Lei, W. Design of hierarchical composite silicate for full-color and high thermal stability phosphors. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 345, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ferrari, A.M.; Orlando, R.; Rérat, M. Ab initio calculation of the ultraviolet–visible (UV-vis) absorption spectrum, electron-loss function, and reflectivity of solids. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 3245–3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pratiwi, D.; Nurosyid, F.; Supriyanto, A.; Suryana, R. Effect of composition of chlorophyll and ruthenium dyes mixture (hybrid) on the dye-sensitized solar cell performance. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Surakarta, Indonesia, 4–5 September 2017; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2018; p. 012030. [Google Scholar]
  46. Shirkavand, M.; Bavir, M.; Fattah, A.; Alaei, H.R.; Tayarani Najaran, M.H. The construction and comparison of dye-sensitized solar cells with blackberry and n719 dyes. J. Optoelectron. Nanostruct. 2018, 3, 79–92. [Google Scholar]
  47. Chandrasekharam, M.; Srinivasarao, C.; Suresh, T.; Reddy, M.A.; Raghavender, M.; Rajkumar, G.; Srinivasu, M.; Reddy, P.Y. High spectral response heteroleptic ruthenium (II) complexes as sensitizers for dye sensitized solar cells. J. Chem. Sci. 2011, 123, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Park, J.H.; Ahn, W.; Kim, Y.J. Synthesis of Ba2SiO4: Eu2+ by a Hybrid Process and Its Luminescent Properties. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 15, 8155–8160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Hung, W.B.; Chen, J.Y.; Sung, K.W.; Chen, T.M. Enhanced conversion efficiency of crystalline Si solar cells via luminescent down-shifting using Ba2SiO4: Eu2+ phosphor. J. Ceram. Process. Res. 2014, 15, 157–161. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ananthakumar, S.; Balaji, D.; Ram Kumar, J.; Moorthy Babu, S. Role of co-sensitization in dye-sensitized and quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bella, F.; Griffini, G.; Gerosa, M.; Turri, S.; Bongiovanni, R. Performance and stability improvements for dye-sensitized solar cells in the presence of luminescent coatings. J. Power Sources 2015, 283, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Inamdar, S.R.; Pujar, G.; Sannaikar, M. FRET from ZnSe/ZnS QDs to coumarin dyes: Role of acceptor dipole moment and QD surface states on FRET efficiency. J. Lumin. 2018, 203, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kaur, A.; Kaur, P.; Ahuja, S. Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) and applications thereof. Anal. Methods 2020, 12, 5532–5550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sapsford, K.E.; Berti, L.; Medintz, I.L. Materials for fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis: Beyond traditional donor–acceptor combinations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4562–4589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, X.; Cui, Q.; Ding, M.; Mao, Y.; Huang, X.; Song, L.; Bu, T. Fortified Donor–Acceptor Spectral Overlap Facilitated Fluorescence Quenching Efficiency for Developing Sensitive Nanometal Surface Energy Transfer-Based Immunochromatographic Test Strips. Anal. Chem. 2025, 97, 5209–5216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Synthesis of the BaSiO3:Eu2+ by solid-state technique.
Figure 1. Synthesis of the BaSiO3:Eu2+ by solid-state technique.
Materials 18 03213 g001
Figure 2. (a). SEM image of BaSiO3:0.03Eu2+ phosphor. (b). Diameter distribution of BaSiO3:Eu2+ nanoparticles.
Figure 2. (a). SEM image of BaSiO3:0.03Eu2+ phosphor. (b). Diameter distribution of BaSiO3:Eu2+ nanoparticles.
Materials 18 03213 g002
Figure 3. EDS spectrum of the BaSiO3:Eu2+.
Figure 3. EDS spectrum of the BaSiO3:Eu2+.
Materials 18 03213 g003
Figure 4. Reflectance spectrum of BaSiO3:Eu2+.
Figure 4. Reflectance spectrum of BaSiO3:Eu2+.
Materials 18 03213 g004
Figure 5. Absorption profile of BaSiO3:Eu2+ material.
Figure 5. Absorption profile of BaSiO3:Eu2+ material.
Materials 18 03213 g005
Figure 6. Band gap estimation of BaSiO3:Eu2+ using first derivative of reflectance.
Figure 6. Band gap estimation of BaSiO3:Eu2+ using first derivative of reflectance.
Materials 18 03213 g006
Figure 7. (a) Photoluminescence excitation and emission spectra of BaSiO3:Eu2+ material. (b) Quantum yield of BaSiO3:Eu2+ material with the reference.
Figure 7. (a) Photoluminescence excitation and emission spectra of BaSiO3:Eu2+ material. (b) Quantum yield of BaSiO3:Eu2+ material with the reference.
Materials 18 03213 g007
Figure 8. CIE 1931 chromaticity diagram of the BaSiO3:Eu2+ for both excitation and emission wavelengths.
Figure 8. CIE 1931 chromaticity diagram of the BaSiO3:Eu2+ for both excitation and emission wavelengths.
Materials 18 03213 g008
Figure 9. Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Mechanism.
Figure 9. Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Mechanism.
Materials 18 03213 g009
Figure 10. Spectral overlap of the N719 dye acceptor and BaSiO3:Eu2+ donor.
Figure 10. Spectral overlap of the N719 dye acceptor and BaSiO3:Eu2+ donor.
Materials 18 03213 g010
Figure 11. FRET efficiency as a function of distance between the donor and acceptor molecules.
Figure 11. FRET efficiency as a function of distance between the donor and acceptor molecules.
Materials 18 03213 g011
Table 1. FRET parameters.
Table 1. FRET parameters.
c ( M 1 / 6 c m 1 / 6 n m 1 / 3 ) k 2 Q Y n J ( λ ) ( M 1 c m 1 n m 4 ) R 0 (nm)
0.2112/30.271.33 2 × 10 10 6.83
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Onah, E.H.; Lethole, N.L.; Mukumba, P. Efficient Energy Transfer Down-Shifting Material for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Materials 2025, 18, 3213. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18143213

AMA Style

Onah EH, Lethole NL, Mukumba P. Efficient Energy Transfer Down-Shifting Material for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Materials. 2025; 18(14):3213. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18143213

Chicago/Turabian Style

Onah, Emeka Harrison, N. L. Lethole, and P. Mukumba. 2025. "Efficient Energy Transfer Down-Shifting Material for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells" Materials 18, no. 14: 3213. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18143213

APA Style

Onah, E. H., Lethole, N. L., & Mukumba, P. (2025). Efficient Energy Transfer Down-Shifting Material for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Materials, 18(14), 3213. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18143213

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop