Next Article in Journal
Island-like Perovskite Photoelectric Synaptic Transistor with ZnO Channel Layer Deposited by Low-Temperature Atomic Layer Deposition
Previous Article in Journal
An Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of Upstream Pumping Effect of Deep Spiral Grooves on Mechanical Face Seals
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study on Low-Velocity Impact and Residual Compressive Mechanical Properties of Carbon Fiber–Epoxy Resin Composites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Dynamic Behavior of Advanced Materials and Structures

State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Safety Protection, Beijing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(12), 2878; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18122878
Submission received: 26 March 2025 / Accepted: 16 June 2025 / Published: 18 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dynamic Behavior of Advanced Materials and Structures)
Following the rise in applications of materials and structures in complex environments, such as high-speed impacts and explosions, research on the dynamic response of materials and structures is becoming increasingly important [1,2,3]. Studying their mechanical behavior of advanced materials and structures, such as mechanical metamaterials [4,5,6,7,8], composites [9,10,11], and lightweight sandwich structures [12,13,14], under dynamic loads and gaining a thorough understanding of their behavioral characteristics under extreme conditions are vital for both material and structural optimization, as well as ensuring their safety and reliability in service. This Special Issue (SI), “Dynamic Behavior of Advanced Materials and Structures”, presents recent theoretical, experimental, and simulation research findings regarding the dynamic behavior of advanced material and structures. This Editorial summarizes the ten publications (nine research articles and one review article) included in this SI.
Unlike traditional materials that expand laterally under compression, auxetics display a distinct negative Poisson’s ratio characteristic, which enhances their energy absorption capacity under dynamic loading [15,16,17]. Accordingly, auxetics have attracted extensive research attention in recent years [18,19,20]. Galea Mifsud et al. [21] summarized the research progress on analyzing the mechanical properties and deformation mechanisms of auxetic systems through finite-element simulations.
Carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRPs) have a variety of advantages properties in comparison to metals, including light weight, high strength, high stiffness, corrosion resistance, and fatigue resistance [22,23], and have been widely used in fields of aerospace and traffic control. However, the dynamic performance and failure mechanism of CFPRs remain unclear due to their complex mesoscopic structure. Qiang et al. [24] presented the low-velocity impact response and residual compressive properties of carbon fiber–epoxy resin (CF/EP) composites, revealing the impact damage on the compression failure mechanisms of the materials. Xi et al. [25] reported that the energy absorption capacities and failure modes of the open-section, thin-walled composite structures under axial crushing loading could be regulated by changing the geometry of the cross-section. Stachyra et al. [26] introduced a novel analytical description for coupled mode shapes of a cantilever composite beam. Lan et al. [27] demonstrated that the preloading value and the impact velocity affected the delamination behavior of CFRP laminated plates significantly. The resistance to out-of-plane displacement of the laminated plates could be enhanced by biaxial tensile preload.
With the advancement of technology, lightweight materials have become widespread in the development of protective structures. Sandwich structures filled with lightweight materials, such as foams and honeycombs, have been widely applied in energy-absorbing devices for collision protection in fields including aerospace, rail transportation, and the automotive industry, due to their light weight, high specific strength, and high specific stiffness [28,29]. How to design high-efficiency sandwich structures for energy absorption is a widely studied topic. Mahgoub et al. [30] experimentally investigated the dynamic response of a sandwich beam filled with a stepwise gradient polymethacrylimide (PMI) foam core under low-velocity impacts, demonstrating that a negative gradient core is beneficial for energy absorption.
In military and public security safety fields, materials and structures are often subjected to explosive shock waves. Bian et al. [31] investigated the dynamic response of non-metallic annular protective structures made by the continuous winding of PE fibers under internal blasts, indicating that the blast resistance of the structure can be improved by adding polyurethane foam in the inner layer. The dynamic response of a rectangular steel plate subjected to shock waves was examined by Li et al. [32] through the wavelet transform (WT) and the improved ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) methods.
Steel automotive wheel rims typically experience dynamic wear and tear during service, which significantly affect their service life. Borecki et al. [33] proposed new methods for identifying the technical condition of steel car wheel rims and predicting the approaching end of wheel rim service life with limited parameters.
Electromagnetic springs, which act as an active vibration isolation system, have been widely researched due to their fast response, non-contact, and adjustable stiffness [34,35]. In the study by Zheng et al. [36], an improved Bouc–Wen Model was proposed to describe the dynamic characteristics of a toothed electromagnetic spring, which enhanced the accuracy of predicting the hysteresis behavior in electromagnetic spring active isolators.
Nowadays, with the rapid development of advanced manufacturing technologies such as additive manufacturing, an increasing number of advanced materials and structures have been developed, including multi-component alloys [37,38,39], interpenetrating phase composites [40,41,42], and nanomaterials [43,44]. Future research needs to pay more attention to the dynamic behavior of these novel materials. Simultaneously, the dynamic behavior of materials often depends on their microstructures, necessitating more extensive application of multi-scale analysis methods for investigation [45,46,47]. Additionally, integrating artificial intelligence technologies with mechanical design and the prediction of materials/structures [48,49,50] also requires further investigation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Meyers, M.A. Dynamic Behavior of Materials; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  2. Silberschmidt, V. Dynamic Deformation, Damage and Fracture in Composite Materials and Structures; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Shukla, A.; Ravichandran, G.; Rajapakse, Y. Dynamic Failure of Materials and Structures; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yu, X.; Zhou, J.; Liang, H.; Jiang, Z.; Wu, L. Mechanical Metamaterials Associated with Stiffness, Rigidity and Compressibility: A Brief Review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 94, 114–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xiao, L.; Shi, G.; Song, W. Machine Learning Predictions on the Compressive Stress–Strain Response of Lattice-Based Metamaterials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2024, 300, 112893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zheng, X.; Lee, H.; Weisgraber, T.H.; Shusteff, M.; DeOtte, J.; Duoss, E.B.; Kuntz, J.D.; Biener, M.M.; Ge, Q.; Jackson, J.A.; et al. Ultralight, Ultrastiff Mechanical Metamaterials. Science 2014, 344, 1373–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Song, W.; Li, R.; Feng, G.; Xiao, L. Large Dynamic Mechanical Behaviors and Deformation Mechanism of Hybrid Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Structures. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2025, 203, 105359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Feng, G.; Li, S.; Xiao, L.; Song, W. Mechanical Properties and Deformation Behavior of Functionally Graded TPMS Structures under Static and Dynamic Loading. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2023, 176, 104554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhu, T.; Ren, Z.; Xu, J.; Shen, L.; Xiao, C.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, X.; Jian, X. Damage evolution model and failure mechanism of continuous carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic resin matrix composite materials. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2023, 244, 110300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, A.; Xu, G.; Liu, X. Effect of polyurea coating on low-velocity impact properties of unidirectional carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites plates. Structures 2024, 61, 106090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, P.; Li, Y.; Yin, B.; Li, S.; Jia, W.; Lao, D.; Wang, H.; Liu, J. New design of bismuth borate ceramic/epoxy composites with excellent fracture toughness and radiation shielding capabilities. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 35, 106102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhu, Y.; Sun, Y. Dynamic response of foam core sandwich panel with composite face sheets during low-velocity impact and penetration. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2020, 139, 103508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Acanfora, V.; Zarrelli, M.; Riccio, A. Experimental and numerical assessment of the impact behaviour of a composite sandwich panel with a polymeric honeycomb core. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2023, 171, 104392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, J.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Wu, T.; Qin, Q. Dynamic response and failure of CFRP Kagome lattice core sandwich panels subjected to low-velocity impact. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2023, 181, 104737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jin, X.; Wang, Z.; Ning, J.; Xiao, G.; Liu, E.; Shu, X. Dynamic Response of Sandwich Structures with Graded Auxetic Honeycomb Cores under Blast Loading. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 106, 206–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, X.; Hao, H.; Tian, R.; Xue, Q.; Guan, H.; Yang, X. Quasi-Static Compression and Dynamic Crushing Behaviors of Novel Hybrid Re-Entrant Auxetic Metamaterials with Enhanced Energy-Absorption. Compos. Struct. 2022, 288, 115399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Ren, X.; Han, D.; Cheng, X.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Xie, Y. Static and Dynamic Properties of a Perforated Metallic Auxetic Metamaterial with Tunable Stiffness and Energy Absorption. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2022, 164, 104193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guo, M.; Yang, H.; Ma, L. 3D Lightweight Double Arrow-Head Plate-Lattice Auxetic Structures with Enhanced Stiffness and Energy Absorption Performance. Compos. Struct. 2022, 290, 115484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Duncan, O.; Shepherd, T.; Moroney, C.; Foster, L.; Venkatraman, P.D.; Winwood, K.; Allen, T.; Alderson, A. Review of Auxetic Materials for Sports Applications: Expanding Options in Comfort and Protection. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kolken, H.M.A.; Zadpoor, A.A. Auxetic Mechanical Metamaterials. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 5111–5129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Galea Mifsud, R.; Muscat, G.A.; Grima-Cornish, J.N.; Dudek, K.K.; Cardona, M.A.; Attard, D.; Farrugia, P.-S.; Gatt, R.; Evans, K.E.; Grima, J.N. Auxetics and FEA: Modern Materials Driven by Modern Simulation Methods. Materials 2024, 17, 1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sridharan, S.; Pankow, M. Performance Evaluation of Two Progressive Damage Models for Composite Laminates under Various Speed Impact Loading. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2020, 143, 103615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, S.; Luan, Y.; Li, Y.; Su, Q.; Guo, Z.; Song, W. A 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced composite with function of self-detecting and self-healing of internal damages. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2023, 243, 110264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Qiang, X.; Wang, T.; Xue, H.; Ding, J.; Deng, C. Study on Low-Velocity Impact and Residual Compressive Mechanical Properties of Carbon Fiber–Epoxy Resin Composites. Materials 2024, 17, 3766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xi, X.; Xue, P.; Liu, X.; Bai, C.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Yang, X. Energy Absorption and Failure Modes of Different Composite Open-Section Crush Elements under Axial Crushing Loading. Materials 2024, 17, 3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Stachyra, G.; Kloda, L.; Szmit, Z. Coupled Modal Analysis and Aerodynamics of Rotating Composite Beam. Materials 2023, 16, 7356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lan, K.; Wang, H.; Wang, C. Delamination Behavior of CFRP Laminated Plates under the Combination of Tensile Preloading and Impact Loading. Materials 2023, 16, 6595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Li, J.; Gao, G.; Yu, Y.; Zhuo, T. Experimental and numerical study on the lightweight design of load-bearing energy absorption structure for subway train. Thin-Walled Struct. 2024, 197, 111542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, X.; Wei, L.; Wen, D.; Zhu, G.; Yu, Q.; Ma, Z. Bending response and energy absorption of sandwich beams with novel auxetic honeycomb core. Eng. Struct. 2021, 247, 113204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mahgoub, M.; Liu, C.; Tan, Z. Study on Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Sandwich Beam with Stepwise Gradient Polymethacrylimide (PMI) Foam Core under Low-Velocity Impact. Materials 2024, 17, 2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bian, X.; Yang, L.; Wang, T.; Huang, G. Numerical Investigation on Anti-Explosion Performance of Non-Metallic Annular Protective Structures. Materials 2023, 16, 7549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Z.; Xu, W.; Wang, C.; Liu, X.; Sun, Y. Investigation on Vibration Characteristics of Thin-Walled Steel Structures under Shock Waves. Materials 2023, 16, 4748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Borecki, M.; Rychlik, A.; Zan, L.; Korwin-Pawlowski, M.L. Steel Automotive Wheel Rims—Data Fusion for the Precise Identification of the Technical Condition and Indication of the Approaching End of Service Life. Materials 2024, 17, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yu, S.; Wang, A.; Zhao, L. Characteristics test study on electromagnetic actuator. Mach. Des. Manuf. 2011, 1, 136–138. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, B. Research on Hybrid Isolator Design Technique. Master’s Thesis, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zheng, X.; Zhang, C.; Lou, Y.; Xue, G.; Bai, H. Dynamic Characteristic Analysis of a Toothed Electromagnetic Spring Based on the Improved Bouc—Wen Model. Materials 2023, 16, 4889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, S.; Hu, M.; Xiao, L.; Feng, G.; Song, K.; Song, W.; Qiao, J. Effects of Strain Rate and Low Temperature on Dynamic Behaviors of Additively Manufactured CoCrFeMnNi High-Entropy Alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2024, 913, 147100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Medvedev, A.E.; Maconachie, T.; Leary, M.; Qian, M.; Brandt, M. Materials & Design Perspectives on Additive Manufacturing for Dynamic Impact Applications. Mater. Des. 2022, 221, 110963. [Google Scholar]
  39. George, E.P.; Curtin, W.A.; Tasan, C.C. High Entropy Alloys: A Focused Review of Mechanical Properties and Deformation Mechanisms. Acta Mater. 2020, 188, 435–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Song, W.; Mu, K.; Feng, G.; Huang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Huang, X.; Xiao, L. Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Interpenetrating Phase Composites with TPMS Architectures. Thin-Walled Struct. 2023, 193, 111210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xiao, L.; Mu, K.; Liu, S.; Song, W. Experimental Study on the Fracture Behavior of 3D Printed Interpenetrating Phase Composites with Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Architectures. Thin-Walled Struct. 2025, 208, 112847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, M.; Zhao, N.; Yu, Q.; Liu, Z.; Qu, R.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Ren, D.; Berto, F.; Zhang, Z.; et al. On the Damage Tolerance of 3-D Printed Mg-Ti Interpenetrating-Phase Composites with Bioinspired Architectures. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Crook, C.; Bauer, J.; Guell Izard, A.; Santos de Oliveira, C.; Martins de Souza e Silva, J.; Berger, J.B.; Valdevit, L. Plate-Nanolattices at the Theoretical Limit of Stiffness and Strength. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, Z.; Gao, H.; Li, X. Achieving the Theoretical Limit of Strength in Shell-Based Carbon Nanolattices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, S.; Sun, T.; Kou, Z.; Han, X.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Orava, J.; Song, K.; et al. Promising Pathways for Balancing Strength and Ductility in Chemically Complex Alloys with Medium-to-high Stacking Fault Energies. Int. J. Plast. 2025, 190, 104358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lei, M.; Aditya, R.; Liu, L.; Wu, M.; Wang, J.; Zhou, K.; Yao, Y. A Multi-Scale Constitutive Model for AlSi10Mg Alloy Fabricated via Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2025, 306, 113111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tang, Y.; Li, D. Dynamic Response of High-Entropy Alloys to Ballistic Impact. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yu, G.; Xiao, L.; Song, W. Deep Learning-Based Heterogeneous Strategy for Customizing Responses of Lattice Structures. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2022, 229, 107531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, X.; Wang, P.; Zhao, M.; Su, X.; Tan, Y.; Ding, J. Customizable Anisotropic Microlattices for Additive Manufacturing: Machine Learning Accelerated Design, Mechanical Properties and Structural-Property Relationships. Addit. Manuf. 2024, 89, 104248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, Q.; Wu, D. Machine Learning and Feature Representation Approaches to Predict Stress-Strain Curves of Additively Manufactured Metamaterials with Varying Structure and Process Parameters. Mater. Des. 2024, 241, 112932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, W.; Xiao, L. Dynamic Behavior of Advanced Materials and Structures. Materials 2025, 18, 2878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18122878

AMA Style

Song W, Xiao L. Dynamic Behavior of Advanced Materials and Structures. Materials. 2025; 18(12):2878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18122878

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Weidong, and Lijun Xiao. 2025. "Dynamic Behavior of Advanced Materials and Structures" Materials 18, no. 12: 2878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18122878

APA Style

Song, W., & Xiao, L. (2025). Dynamic Behavior of Advanced Materials and Structures. Materials, 18(12), 2878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18122878

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop