Next Article in Journal
Sensitivity Analysis in the Problem of the Impact of an External Heat Impulse on Oxygen Distribution in Biological Tissue
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Analysis on Optimal Adhesive Thickness in CFRP Single-Lap Joints Considering Material Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Progress on Major Influencing Factors of Corrosion Behavior of Pipeline Steel in Supercritical CO2 Environment

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(11), 2424; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112424
Submission received: 24 January 2025 / Revised: 23 April 2025 / Accepted: 15 May 2025 / Published: 22 May 2025

Abstract

:
Carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) represents a vital technological strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and facilitating sustainable development. Supercritical CO2 (SC-CO2) pipeline transportation serves as an essential intermediary step towards attaining the “Dual Carbon Goals” and CCUS, representing the optimal and most cost-effective solution for ultra-long distance transport. In the CO2 capture process, trace amounts of impurities, such as H2O, O2, H2S, NOx and SOx, are inevitable. These gases react to form acidic compounds, thereby accelerating pipeline corrosion. With the progression of CCUS initiatives, corrosion within supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation has become a critical challenge that significantly affects the safety and integrity of pipeline infrastructure. This review paper provides an in-depth analysis of the corrosion behavior of pipeline materials in a supercritical CO2 environment, with particular attention to the effects of impurity, temperature, and pressure on corrosion rates, corrosion products, and corrosion morphology. Furthermore, an analysis of the corrosive behavior of welded joints in supercritical CO2 transport pipelines is performed to provide valuable reference data for research and construction projects related to these pipelines.

1. Introduction

With the acceleration of industrialization and the ongoing expansion of human activities, greenhouse gas emissions have consistently risen, resulting in substantial modifications to the Earth’s climate system. Global warming has emerged as one of the most pressing challenges confronting our world today. To achieve sustainable development goals and tackle global climate change, 178 parties collectively adopted the Paris Agreement at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference, aiming to collaboratively mitigate the accelerating trend of global warming [1,2]. In 2020, China launched the ambitious “Dual Carbon Goals”, which aim to achieve peak carbon emissions by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060 [3,4]. CCUS technology represents an effective approach to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel usage, integrating the processes of CO2 capture, transportation, utilization, and storage [5,6]. According to the 2024 Global Status of CCS report by the Global CCS Institute, 2024 has seen significant growth in CCS facility development. As of July 2024, the pipeline includes 628 projects, a 60% year-on-year increase. Capture capacity has seen strong growth since 2017, with an annual compound rate of 32% [7]. Efficient transportation of CO2 is critical for integrating capture and utilization within the CCUS system. Presently, high-pressure pipeline transportation of CO2, operating at pressures between 2 and 15 MPa, represents the most cost-effective and efficient method for ultra-long-distance transport [8]. The number of pipeline projects has seen a substantial increase. Currently, the global CO2 pipeline network extends over 8000 km in length. Projections suggest that, by 2050 and beyond, more than 200,000 km of pipelines will be necessary to support the annual transportation of approximately 10 Gt of CO2 [9]. In August 2022, China inaugurated its first large-scale CCUS project with the establishment of a 109-km CO2 transport pipeline linking Qilu Petrochemical and Shengli Oilfield. The pipeline is engineered to withstand a pressure of up to 12 MPa [10,11].
To enhance cost-effectiveness and optimize transportation efficiency, CO2 is typically compressed into its supercritical state, referred to as SC-CO2. Pure CO2 has a triple point at −56.6 °C and 0.518 MPa, which determines the point where CO2 may co-exist in gas, liquid and solid state [12]. The CO2 critical point is 7.38 MPa and 31.1 °C; below the critical temperature, the CO2 is in the liquid dense phase, and above in the supercritical phase. There is no noticeable phase change above the critical temperature, hence, when the pressure is reduced from above to below the critical pressure, a smooth enthalpy change occurs from super critical fluid to gas [12,13]. The phase diagram for pure CO2 as illustrated in Figure 1 [14]. In the supercritical state, neither an increase in pressure nor temperature results in a significant alteration of the state of CO2. The unique properties of supercritical CO2, such as low viscosity and high density, render it an energy-efficient state for transportation [14,15,16,17]. However, operating at higher pressures is associated with increased risks of corrosion and ductile running fractures of pipeline. The underground installation of supercritical CO2 transport pipelines demands the utmost emphasis on pipeline safety. Potential leaks could lead to significant adverse outcomes, including greenhouse gas emissions, water contamination, soil acidification, and considerable economic losses [17,18]. The existing review papers address various aspects, including the design of CO2 transportation pipelines, evaluation methods for metal corrosion in dense-phase CO2 environments, the corrosion mechanisms of pipelines, and anti-corrosion technologies. Considering the internal corrosion of pipeline steel in a supercritical CO2 environment, this study comprehensively examines the influence of various factors, including material composition, moisture, impurities, temperature, pressure, and flow rate, on corrosion rate, corrosion products, and corrosion morphology. Furthermore, this study reviews the current research status of welded joints under supercritical CO2 conditions, offering valuable insights for investigating corrosion issues in supercritical CO2 transport pipelines.

2. Corrosion Behavior of Carbon Steel in CO2

CO2 corrosion results from the dissolution of CO2 in water, which subsequently forms carbonic acid (H2CO3). The interaction between carbon steel and CO2 triggers a complex electrochemical corrosion process, which ultimately results in corrosion on the metal surface. The reaction mechanism responsible for this phenomenon is illustrated as follows [19,20,21,22]. The corrosion schematic is shown in Figure 2.
(1)
When CO2 dissolves in water, it reacts chemically with water molecules to form H2CO3. H2CO3 is categorized as a weak acid, and a fraction of it further dissociates into bicarbonate ions (HCO3) and carbonate ions (CO32−).
C O 2 g C O 2 a q
C O 2 g + H 2 O l H 2 C O 3 a q
H 2 C O 3 H + + H C O 3
H C O 3 H + + C O 3 2
(2)
Cathode reaction: The reduction of H+ ions occurs, leading to the acquisition of electrons and the formation of H2. Additionally, this reduction process involves H2CO3 and CO32−.
2 H + + 2 e H 2
2 H 2 C O 3 + 2 e H 2 + 2 H C O 3
2 H C O 3 + 2 e H 2 + 2 C O 3 2
(3)
The anode reaction encompasses the dissolution of the Fe anode, the generation of Fe2+ ions, and the formation of carbonate compounds.
F e F e 2 + + 2 e
F e 2 + + C O 3 2 F e C O 3
F e 2 + + 2 H C O 3 F e H C O 3 2
F e H C O 3 2 F e C O 3 + C O 2 + H 2 O
The substrate surface is coated with a dense film of corrosion products (FeCO3), which effectively inhibits the diffusion of corrosive ions. This protective layer consequently safeguards the material surface and mitigates the corrosion process initiated by the corrosive medium, ultimately enhancing the overall corrosion resistance.
The corrosion of steel in CO2 environment can be classified into localized and uniform corrosion [23]. Currently, there is no unified regulation regarding corrosion standards for CCUS supercritical CO2 pipelines in China. However, within the petroleum industry, severe corrosion is defined as a uniform corrosion rate exceeding 0.25 mm/year for carbon steel and a maximum pitting depth greater than 0.38 mm/year [24]. The corrosion environment can be primarily categorized into two phases: the water-saturated CO2 phase, which predominantly occurs during CO2 transport and injection, and the CO2-saturated water phase, which is mainly observed during CO2 injection and subsequent oil and gas production [25,26].

3. Factors Influencing Corrosion in Supercritical CO2 Transportation Pipelines

The corrosion issues in supercritical CO2 pipelines primarily originate from two factors. First, in the carbon capture process, despite achieving a CO2 purity of over 99.5%, the captured CO2 frequently contains trace amounts of impurities, such as H2O, O2, NOx, H2S, and SOx [7,27,28]. Internal corrosion is a significant risk to the integrity of carbon steel pipelines in case of insufficient dewatering of the CO2 composition [14]. Once a water droplet is formed and attached to the steel surface, it strongly etches the surface and initiates localized attacks, potentially leading to leakage [15]. These impurities, such as NOx, H2S or SOx, can dissolve in water, leading to a decrease in pH levels and an increase in the corrosion rate of pipeline steel. In severe cases, this may result in material failure and CO2 leakage, posing potential safety hazards. The second factor pertains to the impact of internal conditions during transportation, such as multiphase flow (coexistence of gas and liquid phases) induced by fluctuations in temperature and pressure. These conditions can result in localized corrosion [29,30,31]. In summary, the corrosion characteristics of CO2 are influenced by multiple factors, including material composition, impurity content, CO2 partial pressure, temperature, pH value, and flow rate. These factors can potentially accelerate the corrosion rate of pipelines, thereby shortening their service life. American Petroleum Institute (API) specification 5L is extensively utilized in the classification and designation of pipeline steel grades. Therefore, the materials examined in the literature on the corrosion of pipeline steel in supercritical CO2 environments primarily comprise specific grades of pipeline steel, such as X65 and X70.

3.1. Water Content

Among various impurities, H2O is the most significant factor. H2O not only reacts directly with Fe as a gaseous oxidizer but can also condense on the steel surface, dissolve CO2 or other impurity gases, and form an acidic solution. This process facilitates electrochemical reactions, thereby exacerbating corrosion damage [32]. For instance, when SO2 impurities are present, reducing the water content is more effective in mitigating corrosion issues compared to decreasing the SO2 concentration [33]. In scientific studies, water content is typically expressed in two primary forms: absolute water content and relative humidity. The actual water content is typically quantified in parts per million by volume (PPMV), whereas relative humidity (RH) is commonly expressed as a percentage (%). RH represents the ratio of the actual water content to the saturation water content, which is influenced by both temperature and pressure [34]. Table 1 presents a comprehensive summary of numerous authors’ results from their experiments in supercritical CO2 environments with differing water content levels.
Jiang et al. [35] investigated the corrosion behavior of X65 steel in various CO2 environments and discovered that the critical water content for initiating corrosion is 60% RH in both liquid and supercritical CO2, whereas this is 80% RH in gaseous CO2. Prior to the observation of a single water phase, the corrosion rate remains stable as relative humidity increases. When the relative humidity exceeds 60% at temperatures of 35 °C and a pressure of 8 MPa, localized corrosion and severe uniform corrosion will occur. Hua et al. [36] investigated the corrosion behavior of X65 steel exposed to supercritical CO2 at 50 °C and 80 bar. The average corrosion rate, after immersing the sample in 300 mL of supercritical CO2-saturated water for 96 h, was measured to be 4.1 mm/year. In the supercritical CO2 phase saturated with water (exceeding 3400 ppm), an FeCO3 corrosion product film gradually formed and densified on the sample surface over time, leading to a progressive reduction in the corrosion rate. The corrosion rate was measured at 0.03 mm/year, whereas local corrosion rates were observed to reach up to 1.4 mm/year for immersion times of 48 h. Reducing the water content to 2650 ppm resulted in a decrease in the corrosion rate to 0.015 mm/year and a mitigation of the local corrosion rate to 0.2 mm/year. Notably, no dissolution of the steel was observed when the water content was below 1600 ppm. Liu et al. [37] constructed a novel in situ electrochemical noise (EN) testing system for supercritical CO2 corrosion, and the influences of water content (500–5000 ppmv) on the corrosion kinetics of X65 pipeline steel were investigated. The results revealed that the primary corrosion type was localized corrosion, characterized by the coexistence of metastable and stable pitting, with a trend toward uniform corrosion. Both the uniform corrosion rate and pitting corrosion rate were found to increase when increasing the water content, and the pitting corrosion rate was almost 20 times more than the uniform corrosion rate.
The critical relative humidity varies across different systems. Xiang et al. [38] quantified the corrosion rate of X70 steel in a CO2-SO2-O2 environment using the weight loss method, and developed a thermodynamic model for pipelines to establish the upper limit of water content in supercritical CO2 transport systems. The experimental results demonstrated that the critical relative humidity ranged from 50% to 60%. At a critical relative humidity of 50%, the corrosion rate of X70 steel was 0.0387 mm/year, with the primary corrosion products being FeSO4 crystalline hydrate and FeSO3 crystalline hydrate (Figure 3a). Liu et al. [39] investigated the corrosion behavior of X52 steel in a supercritical CO2 system containing multiple impurities, including O2, H2S, SO2, and NO2. The results revealed that, as the water content increased from 20 ppmv to 4333 ppmv, the corrosion rate of X52 steel correspondingly escalated from 0.0199 mm/y to 0.2838 mm/y (Figure 3b). Moreover, as the water content increases, the corrosion product film progressively transitions from predominantly FeOOH to a mixed film of FeSO4 and FeOOH. The critical water content that markedly alters the corrosion rate was 100 ppmv. Sun et al. [40] determined that the critical water content for X65 steel is 1500 ppmv when corroded in a supercritical CO2-H2O-O2-H2S-SO2 environment at 10 MPa and 50 °C. When the water content was below 1500 ppmv, the corrosion effect of impurity interactions dominated the corrosion process (Figure 3c). When the water content exceeded 1500 ppmv, the corrosion rate increased significantly, and the corrosion products included FeSO4, FeOOH, S, FeS0.9, and FeSO3. The corrosion process was governed by both the interactions between impurities and the corrosive effects of individual impurities.
Currently, in CO2 transportation pipelines, API pipeline steels are predominantly utilized. Figure 4 summarizes average corrosion rates for five pipeline steels exposed to various water contents [35,36,37,39,40,41]. It is seen from the above studies that the influence of water content on the corrosion behavior of steel in a supercritical CO2 environment exhibits a critical threshold. The critical threshold varies depending on the material and corrosion environment. As the water content exceeds the critical value, a free water phase forms, leading to the development of a water film on the steel surface and the dissolution of CO2 and other impurities, which results in an increased rate of corrosion. Provided that the water content in supercritical CO2 remains below the critical threshold, the corrosion rate remains relatively low, irrespective of the presence of impurities [35,40,41,42,43,44]. It is noteworthy that, as water content varies, the local corrosion rate exhibits more rapid fluctuations. Moreover, the critical threshold of water content for local corrosion is significantly lower than that corresponding to the average corrosion rate under identical conditions [36,37,41,42,43]. As per the NACE standard RP0775-2023 [45], the corrosion behavior of carbon steel can be categorized into three distinct types: low corrosion (average general corrosion rate < 0.05 mm/y, maximum pitting rate < 0.13 mm/y), moderate corrosion (average general corrosion rate: 0.05–0.2 mm/y, maximum pitting rate: 0.13–0.3 mm/y), and high corrosion (average general corrosion rate > 0.2 mm/y, maximum pitting rate > 0.3 mm/y). In accordance with this standard, to ensure that the pipe material maintains a low corrosion level, it is essential to control the water content. It is evident from the data presented in Table 1 that, under identical conditions, when the maximum pitting rate is used as the criterion for evaluation, the permitted water content is significantly lower than that associated with the average general corrosion rate. Therefore, there is no universally accepted standard for the upper limit of water content in supercritical CO2.

3.2. O2 Content

When O2 is present in the corrosion system, it reacts with Fe2+ to progressively oxidize Fe2+ to Fe3+, leading to the formation of Fe(OH)3 and Fe2O3, as indicated in Equations (12) and (13). This reaction disrupts the originally dense protective layer of FeCO3 and accelerates the corrosion process [46,47]. The presence of O2 can result in a localized oxygen concentration difference, which may lead to more severe localized corrosion. Under high temperature and pressure conditions, the coexistence of CO2 and O2 can lead to severe localized corrosion on the inner wall of the pipeline [48,49]. In supercritical CO2 transport, O2 can alter the solubility of H2O in supercritical CO2, modify the reaction pathway, and function as an oxidizer, thereby further influencing the corrosion process [50]. However, certain studies have demonstrated that, within a specific concentration range, increasing O2 concentration can actually decrease the corrosion rate. Table 2 presents a comprehensive summary of numerous authors’ results after conducing experiments in supercritical CO2 environments with differing O2 content levels.
4 F e O H 2 + 2 H 2 O + O 2 4 F e O H 3
4 F e O H 3 F e 2 O 3 + 3 H 2 O
Li et al. [32] investigated the corrosion behavior of various pipeline steels in a water-saturated supercritical CO2 environment containing 3% and 6% O2. The results revealed that, at pressures ≤ 9 MPa, the corrosion rates of several materials exhibited a slight increase with higher O2 concentrations. Sun et al. [47] also found that, within an O2 concentration range of 0–1000 ppm, the corrosion rate of X70 steel in supercritical CO2 environments increased progressively with rising O2 concentration. Electrochemical tests of X65 steel in supercritical CO2 environments with varying concentrations of O2 (95–475 mg/L) demonstrated that the addition of even small amounts of O2 caused a negative shift in the corrosion potential, an increase in corrosion current density, and a decrease in impedance [48]. These findings indicate that O2 significantly accelerates the corrosion of steel in these conditions. Further studies revealed that a minor amount of O2 inhibits the formation of the FeCO3 film, while promoting the development of porous Fe2O3. Additionally, as the concentration of O2 increases, the corrosion rate also rises (Figure 5(a1–a4)) [50]. However, Hua et al. [42] discovered that the impact of O2 content in water-saturated supercritical CO2 on uniform corrosion differs from its effect on local corrosion. The uniform corrosion rate of X65 and 5Cr steel decreased with the increase in O2 content, while the local corrosion rate increased. (Figure 5(b1,b2)). The presence of O2 facilitated the formation of Fe2O3 along with other oxides and hydroxides. While the thin amorphous oxide layer serves to mitigate uniform corrosion, the galvanic effect arising from the film’s heterogeneity exacerbates localized corrosion. Li et al. [49] s investigated the corrosion of N80 carbon steel in supercritical CO2 under the partial pressure of 0–10 bar O2 and found that the corrosion rate decreased with increase in the partial pressure of O2. In the initial stage of corrosion, O2 facilitated the formation of iron hydroxide and oxide films on the sample surface, creating a diffusion barrier layer. This led to the accumulation of Fe2+ and CO32−, which subsequently resulted in the formation of a protective FeCO3 film that inhibited further steel corrosion. Xu et al. [43] investigated the corrosion behavior of X70 steel in a supercritical CO2-H2O-SO2-O2 system at 10 MPa and 50 °C, and found that the effect of O2 on corrosion rate varied with water content in dynamic condition. Specifically, within the relative water content range of 50–60%, the uniform corrosion of X70 steel increased as O2 concentration rose from 0.1 mol% to 1.0 mol%, and both the local corrosion rate and severity showed a significant increase with rising O2 concentration (from 0.1 mol% to 1.0 mol%) within the relative water content range of 50–88%. The critical relative water content was 60% when O2 content was 0.1 mol%, while the critical relative water content dropped to 45% when O2 content was 1.0 mol%. Wang et al. [52] found that the integrity of the FeCO3 corrosion product film was destroyed by low concentrations of O2, thereby accelerating corrosion in a water-saturated CO2 system. However, when the O2 concentration reached 1000 ppm, the steel matrix entered a passivation zone, leading to a decrease in the corrosion rate. Figure 6 summarizes average corrosion rates for three pipeline steels exposed to various O2 contents [42,43,47,51].
As previously discussed, the results in the published literature regarding the impact of O2 content on steel corrosion in a supercritical CO2 environment are inconsistent [32,42,43,47,48,49,50,51]. However, as the O2 content increases, the growth rate of the corrosion rate of steel exhibits a decreasing trend. In a supercritical CO2 environment, the presence of O2 may lead to the formation of iron oxides, such as Fe2O3, Fe3O4 and FeOOH. The alteration of the corrosion product film could influence the uniform corrosion process of steel. When the oxide film is relatively dense, it can inhibit the penetration of corrosive media, thereby mitigating the uniform corrosion of steel. The impact of O2 on the local corrosion rate is highly significant [42,43]. When the average corrosion rate decreases under conditions of high O2 content, the local corrosion rate may increase even further [42]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that O2 exhibits enhanced synergistic effects with other impurities in the system, such as H2O and SO2, thereby significantly influencing the corrosion process of steel [32,47,48,49]. Therefore, it is imperative to control the O2 content in transportation systems as much as possible. According to the current specifications of the international DYNAMIS project, the O2 concentration should be limited to no more than 1000 ppmv during enhanced oil recovery (EOR) applications [52].

3.3. H2S Content

If a condensed water film was formed on the pipeline steel, the dissolution of H2S in the water film and the subsequent dissociation would generate S2−, HS and H+, and the iron cations (Fe2+) could react with the anions (S2−) to form the iron sulfide layer on the surface of steel, as illustrated in Equations (14) [53] and (15) [54]. The deposition of these sulfides on the steel surface can exacerbate corrosion, leading to a significant reduction in the strength and toughness of the steel [53,54,55]. The presence of H2S not only affects the solubility of other impurities but also reduces the solubility of H2O in a CO2-H2S system compared to a pure CO2 system [56]. Table 3 presents a comprehensive summary of numerous authors’ results after experiments in supercritical CO2 environments with differing H2S content levels.
F e 2 + + S 2 F e S
F e 2 + + H S F e S + H +
Sun et al. [54] discovered that N80 steel exhibits uniform corrosion in the absence of H2S; the corrosion rate of N80 initially increased slightly with the increase in H2S partial pressure, and then decreased significantly in a supercritical CO2 system containing H2S. When the partial pressure of H2S ranges from 0.004 bar to 4 bar, both uniform and localized corrosion occur. As the partial pressure of H2S increases further, uniform corrosion remains predominant, while the corrosion products progressively transform from FeCO3 to FeS (Figure 7b). They also found that the H2S-induced phase distribution changes point to the root cause of H2S-enhanced corrosion. Furthermore, preparing an amorphous Ni-P coating on X65 pipeline steel could prevent over 80% of localized corrosion [55]. Wei et al. [57] investigated the corrosion behavior of various steels in a dynamic supercritical CO2 environment with a lower H2S content (50 ppm). After 240 h of corrosion testing under dynamic conditions at 80 °C and 10 MPa, low alloy steel exhibited severe uniform and localized corrosion in an aqueous medium. In contrast, 316L stainless steel primarily experienced pitting corrosion. In supercritical CO2 environments, low alloy steel showed predominantly localized corrosion, whereas 316L stainless steel demonstrated strong corrosion resistance with no significant signs of corrosion (Figure 7a). They found that the presence of a small amount of H2S altered the adsorption behavior of H2O on the steel surface in a dynamic supercritical environment, leading to more extensive H2O adsorption across the entire surface, and accelerated both uniform and localized corrosion of X65 steel in the dynamic supercritical CO2 environment. The small amount of H2S played a more significant role in the dynamic CO2-saturated water phase, which changed the microstructure and composition of the corrosion products, and changed the dominated corrosion type of X65 steel from local corrosion to uniform corrosion [58]. Wang et al. [59] found that the corrosion rate of Q125 steel in supercritical CO2 increased significantly with the rise in H2S partial pressure, leading to more severe localized corrosion. The corrosion products evolved from a single-layer structure into a double-layer structure, with the inner layer comprising iron sulfide, FeCO3, and a minor amount of Cr(OH)3, while the outer layer consisted primarily of FeCO3. Conversely, in the formation water phase, the corrosion rate decreased with increasing H2S partial pressure, and the corrosion products also exhibited a double-layer structure. It is evident that H2S alters the morphological structure of corrosion products, yet its influence on the corrosion rate varies depending on the material and corrosion system.
Through the aforementioned research, it can be conclusively stated that the presence of H2S in a supercritical CO2 environment accelerates the corrosion rate of steel. The corrosion products exhibit a distinct double-layered structure. Moreover, the influence of H2S on the corrosion behavior of steel in the water phase is significantly greater than that in the CO2 phase. H2S dissolves in water to form an acidic solution, which substantially increases the corrosion rate of steel. However, H2S does not accelerate the localized corrosion rate of steel. Furthermore, the presence of H2S in the water phase induces a transition in the corrosion behavior of steel from localized to general corrosion.

3.4. SO2 Content

In supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation, if there are H2O and SO2, SO2 dissolves in water to form H+ and HSO3, which reduces the pH value of the system and accelerates the corrosion of the pipeline. In the CO2-SO2 system, the predominant corrosion product is precipitated FeSO3, where SO2 acts as the primary driving force [61,62]. In the CO2-SO2-O2 system, the presence of O2 causes the corrosion product FeSO3 to undergo further oxidation, resulting in the formation of FeSO4. If oxygen is present in sufficient quantities, FeOOH will be further oxidized, as illustrated in Equations (16)–(20) [63,64]. Table 4 presents a comprehensive summary of numerous authors’ results after conducting experiments in supercritical CO2 environments with differing SO2 content levels.
H 2 O + S O 2 H + + H S O 3 2
H S O 3 2 H + + S O 3 2
S O 3 2 + F e 2 + F e S O 3
F e 2 + + S O 4 2 F e S O 4
4 F e S O 4 + 6 H 2 O + O 2 4 F e O O H + 4 H 2 S O 4
The corrosion rate of X70 steel was observed to increase as the SO2 concentration rose in a dynamic supercritical environment. The primary corrosion products identified were FeSO4 and FeSO3·XH2O, which formed a protective layer on the specimen surface, thereby reducing the corrosion rate [61]. Hua et al. [62] investigated the corrosion behavior of X65 steel in both water-saturated and unsaturated supercritical CO2 environments and found that the presence of O2 and SO2 impurities significantly increased the corrosion rate, leading to pronounced pitting corrosion. In the absence of O2 and SO2, the critical water content required to maintain an overall corrosion rate below 0.1 mm/year was 3400 ppm, which was close to the solubility limit of water in CO2 under the corresponding conditions. However, with the addition of 50 ppm SO2 and 20 ppm O2, the critical water content decreased to 2120 ppm. When the SO2 concentration was increased to 100 ppm, the critical water content further reduced to 1850 ppm. Notably, the critical water content required to mitigate localized corrosion was 500 ppm, regardless of the SO2 concentration.
Mahlobo et al. [66] investigated the corrosion behavior of pipeline steel in a supercritical CO2 environment containing 0.5–5% SO2 impurities over a period of 1512 h. Their results demonstrated that, as the SO2 concentration increased to 5%, the corrosion rate markedly escalated, reaching a peak of 1.396 mm/year. Given that the solubility of SO2 is higher than that of CO2, the SO2 system at high concentrations exhibits greater corrosiveness. Wang et al. [51] investigated synergistic effect of O2 and SO2 gas impurities on X70 steel corrosion in water-saturated supercritical CO2 environment and found the impact of SO2 was more pronounced than that of O2. The synergistic effect between SO2 and O2 was influenced by their varying concentrations; higher concentrations of O2 exhibited a certain inhibitory effect on the corrosion process (Figure 8). Sun et al. [60,64] found that, in water-saturated supercritical CO2 systems, SO2 exerted a more pronounced effect on the average corrosion rate of X65 steel compared to H2S and O2 when present as single impurities. The synergistic effects of multiple impurities on corrosion rates were observed in the following order: SO2-H2S (4.88), SO2-SO2 (35.69), SH2S-SO2 (42.03), and SO2-H2S-SO2 (54.88). In the presence of both H2S and SO2, sulfur can be produced, which subsequently reacts with water to form sulfuric acid (H2SO4), as shown by Equations (21) and (22):
2 H 2 S + S O 2 3 S + 2 H 2 O
8 S + 8 H 2 O 6 H 2 S + 2 H 2 S O 4
Similar to the effect of H2S, the presence of SO2 accelerates the corrosion rate of steel in supercritical CO2 environments. The composition and morphology of corrosion products are highly complex, exhibiting a multi-layered structure. When SO2 is present as a sole impurity gas, it does not significantly influence the localized corrosion behavior of steel in a supercritical CO2 environment.

3.5. NO2 Content

NO2 is a potent oxidizing gas that readily dissolves in water to form nitric acid (HNO3), thereby reducing the pH of the system. This has a significant impact on corrosion behavior in supercritical CO2 environments. Corrosion products may include oxides and nitrates, such as Fe(NO3)3, as indicated in Equations (23)–(25) [67]. These products can dissolve the surface protective layer, thus altering corrosion behavior and potentially leading to pitting corrosion at higher concentrations [34]. Table 5 presents a summary of the experimental results obtained in a supercritical CO2 environments contaminated with NO2 impurities.
3 N O 2 + H 2 O N O + 2 H N O 3
F e 3 + + 3 N O 3 F e N O 3 3
4 F e N O 3 3 2 F e 2 O 3 + 12 N O 2 + 3 O 2
Morland et al. [67] discovered that, in dense phase CO2 at 25 °C and 10 MPa, carbon steel began to corrode when the NO2 content was 75 ppmv and the water content reached 350 ppmv. The corrosion significantly intensified when the water content increased to 670 ppmv, with a corrosion rate of 0.57 mm/year. The corrosion products transitioned from black to brown, indicating the formation of iron oxides, though the specific type remains undetermined. Given the conditions of the corrosive medium, it is plausible that carbon steel may form FeOOH upon exposure to NO, NO2, or HNO3. This observation was also corroborated by other researchers [63,68]. Li et al. [63] discovered that the corrosion rate of X80 steel was 5.30 mm/y after 48 h in a supercritical CO2 environment containing 100 ppmv of NO2, which was significantly higher than that in an environment with O2, SO2, and without impurities. HNO3 released H+ ions, thereby facilitating the cathodic reaction, and the corrosion products formed display inadequate adhesion to the steel matrix and insufficient protective properties, consequently accelerating the corrosion of X80 steel. (Figure 9). In dense phase CO2 environments containing NO2 and H2O, the corrosion rate of X65 steel ranged from 0.06 to 1.66 mm/year, which was significantly higher than that observed in similar concentrations of SO2 impurities [68]. Sun et al. [69] investigated the corrosion behavior of X65 steel in supercritical CO2 saturated with water containing O2, H2S, SO2, and NO2 impurities at 10 MPa and 50 °C. Their findings indicated that NO2 is the dominant factor controlling the corrosion behavior of X65 steel, and NO2 and SO2 exert the most significant influence on the corrosion of X65 steel, followed by H2S and O2. Local corrosion occurred in an environment containing only NO2 impurities, where the corrosion products primarily consisted of Fe2O3·H2O, with minor amounts of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O.
They also found that the influence of different impurities affects stress corrosion cracking (SCC) sensitivity. Specifically, O2 has minimal impact on enhancing SCC susceptibility of X65 steel, whereas SO2 and NO2 greatly enhance SCC susceptibility due to their strong corrosion effects. The SCC process of X65 steel in a supercritical CO2 environment also varies based on the type of impurities [70]. There is a relative paucity of studies focusing on NO2 as an individual impurity, with more research concentrating on the synergistic effects within multi-impurity systems.
There is a limited number of studies investigating the influence of NO2 on the corrosion behavior of steel in supercritical CO2 environments. Based on existing research findings, NO2 has been shown to accelerate steel corrosion in such environments and induce local corrosion. When present as a single impurity gas, NO2 exerts a greater impact on the corrosion rate of steel in supercritical CO2 environments compared to O2, SO2, and H2S.
Table 5. Corrosion behavior of steel with NO2 impurities in supercritical CO2.
Table 5. Corrosion behavior of steel with NO2 impurities in supercritical CO2.
MaterialsPressures (MPa)Temperature (°C)EnvironmentNO2 ContentOther ImpuritiesCorrosion Time (h)Corrosion Rate (mm/y)Corrosion ProductsReference
X80835CO2-saturated 1wt% NaCl solution0 481.67FeCO3, Fe2O3[63]
100 ppmv5.30FeCO3, FeOOH
X651050water-saturated CO2 phase0 24~0.04FeCO3[69]
1000 ppmv1.72–1.76FeCO3, Fe(NO3)3∙9H2O, Fe2O3∙H2O
0120<0.04FeCO3
1000 ppmv0.44–0.48FeCO3, Fe(NO3)3∙9H2O, Fe2O3∙H2O

3.6. Influence of Working Conditions (Temperature, Pressure, Flow Rate, Time)

Changes in temperature and pressure not only influence the solubility of H2O in supercritical CO2 and the solubility of impurity gases in CO2 within H2O, but also alter the morphology of corrosion products and the reaction rate [71].
Nazari et al. [72] discovered that the morphology and stability of corrosion products on X70 steel are significantly influenced by temperature in a CO2 environment ranging from 55 °C to 85 °C. At higher temperatures, the corrosion products become denser and more resistant to disintegration or detachment, thereby effectively inhibiting further corrosion of the substrate and enhancing its protective efficacy. Sui et al. [73] investigated the corrosion behavior of X65 steel in a supercritical CO2 environment across various temperatures and pressures. Their findings revealed that the most severe surface corrosion occurred at 8 MPa and 35 °C, with a corrosion rate of 0.190 mm/year. When the temperature increased to 50 °C, the corrosion rate decreased to 0.032 mm/year. Likewise, at a constant temperature of 35 °C, as the pressure was raised to 10 MPa, the corrosion rate reduced to 0.073 mm/year. Hua et al. [74] investigated the corrosion behavior of X65 steel in supercritical CO2 environments at varying temperatures and water contents. Despite similar molar concentrations of water at both temperatures, the CO2 density difference results in more than double the mass of water being dissolved into the CO2 phase per unit volume at 35 °C compared to 50 °C. This leads to a higher corrosion rate at 35 °C relative to 50 °C under water-saturated CO2 conditions. Additionally, the corrosion product film formed at 50 °C was denser and more protective. Wang et al. [75] investigated the corrosion behavior of N80 steel under experimental conditions involving formation water and supercritical CO2 at pressures of 10 MPa and temperatures ranging from 40 °C to 120 °C. They discovered that increasing temperature facilitated the formation of FeCO3. In both environments, the corrosion rate of N80 initially increased with rising temperature but subsequently decreased at higher temperatures. However, the corrosion products formed in different environments exhibit markedly distinct characteristics. In a formation water environment, the corrosion products tend to be more uniform and regular. In contrast, those formed in a supercritical CO2 environment display a variety of morphologies, including spherical, lamellar, and needle-like structures (Figure 10).
The influence of pressure on solubility leads to a decrease in the pH of the corrosive medium, an increase in the activity of corrosive ions, and alterations in the electric double layer at the steel/liquid interface. Consequently, in both O2-free and O2-containing water-saturated CO2 systems, the corrosion rates of several pipeline steels increased as pressure rose from 6.2 to 9 MPa, with a more rapid increase observed at 10 MPa [32]. Xu et al. [41] studied the corrosion behavior of supercritical CO2 containing SO2 and O2 by water content on several pipeline steels at 50 °C and 8–12 MPa. The research revealed that pressure significantly influences the solubility of water in CO2, thereby affecting the corrosion rate. Specifically, when the water content was below 2600 ppm, the corrosion rate at 10 MPa was marginally lower than that at 8 MPa. However, with a water content of 3000 ppm, the corrosion rate at 10 MPa markedly increased, surpassing the rate observed at 8 MPa. Additionally, the surface corrosion morphology of the X65 steel sample exhibited changes under these conditions. In the study of CO2-saturated water phase, Rodrigues et al. [76] investigated the effect of pressure on CO2 corrosion when water was the sole impurity at 50 °C and at pressures ranging from 2 to 20 MPa. FeCO3 scales formed under supercritical pressures and, in CO2-saturated water, exhibited significantly enhanced protective properties. Compared to the corrosion rate in subcritical wet CO2 environments (0.05–0.09 mm/year), the corrosion rate in the CO2-saturated water phase showed a significant increase, reaching 0.59–5.09 mm/year.
The flow rate increases the accessibility of corrosive ions (H+) to the surface of the metal matrix, thereby accelerating the corrosion process. Additionally, it carries Fe2+ ions away from the matrix surface, which hinders the formation of the protective FeCO3 film [77]. Wei et al. [78] investigated the corrosion behavior of X70 steel in CO2-saturated water under both static and dynamic conditions (0–2 m/s) and obtained consistent conclusions. The corrosion rate and pit depth were significantly higher under dynamic conditions compared to static conditions, suggesting that localized corrosion predominates when fluid motion is present (Figure 11). They also discovered that the variation in flow rate altered the predominant corrosion type in the supercritical CO2-saturated water phase from uniform corrosion to localized corrosion. The number and size of FeCO3 particles increased over time, leading to a thicker and denser FeCO3 corrosion product layer, which in turn enhanced the protective effect on the substrate. However, under dynamic conditions during the initial stage of corrosion, the absence of corrosion products allows the corrosive medium to easily reach the substrate surface, resulting in severe localized corrosion [78]. Zeng et al. [79] discovered that, in a static supercritical CO2 environment, uniform corrosion predominates whereas, under dynamic conditions, localized corrosion is more pronounced and the corrosion rate increased significantly. Li et al. [80] found that the increase in flow velocity (from 0 to 2 m/s) disrupts the densification of the FeCO3 corrosion product film, thereby diminishing its protective effect on the substrate and accelerating the corrosion rate. Electrochemical test results also indicate that, as flow velocity increases, the self-corrosion current density rises while impedance decreases. Wang et al. [81] investigated the corrosion behavior of 13Cr SS in the presence of CO2 and H2S at flow rates ranging from 0 to 2.5 m/s. They discovered that the corrosion product film was more prone to detachment in the static water phase compared to the CO2 phase. Consequently, after 336 h, the thickness of the corrosion product layer on the sample surface in the aqueous phase was significantly lower.
The corrosion duration in a supercritical CO2 environment not only influences the thickness and composition of the corrosion product film but also impacts its protective properties, the initiation of localized corrosion, and changes in the corrosion rate. Mahlobo et al. [66] investigated the long-term corrosion behavior of carbon steel in supercritical CO2 environments and found that the protective efficacy of the corrosion product film increased progressively over time, leading to a lower corrosion rate after 1512 h compared to that observed at 336 h. Wang et al. [82] proposed that, in the H2O-rich phase, as corrosion time increased, the corrosion product layer evolved from porous to dense, ultimately forming a protective layer. In the CO2-rich phase, corrosion products predominantly formed in water condensation regions, resulting in the formation of FeCO3. Hua et al. [36] discovered that, in the CO2-saturated water phase, the types and forms of corrosion products evolved over time. In comparison with the CO2-saturated water phase, uniform corrosion is more prevalent in environments where water is less abundant. They also found that, as the exposure time of X65 and 13Cr in water-saturated supercritical CO2 containing SO2 and O2 increased from 6 h to 48 h, the uniform corrosion rate and local corrosion rate decreased, but the local corrosion depth increased [83].
Compared with the influence of pressure, the conclusions drawn from various studies regarding the effects of temperature, flow rate, and time on the corrosion behavior of steel in supercritical CO2 environments are relatively consistent. Temperature variations can significantly influence the morphology of corrosion products and modulate the rate of corrosion reactions. Overall, at higher temperatures, the corrosion products formed on steel in a supercritical CO2 environment are denser, which enhances the protective barrier for the substrate and consequently reduces the corrosion rate. The composition and morphology of the corrosion products evolve over time. As time progresses, the corrosion products will gradually thicken and densify, consequently reducing the corrosion rate of the steel. In a supercritical CO2 environment, the flow of fluids can erode corrosion products on the steel surface, potentially causing their detachment and thereby diminishing their protective capabilities. Additionally, the flow process enhances the transport of corrosive ions, such as H+, HCO3, and CO32−, thereby accelerating both the average and localized corrosion rates of steel. Pressure not only affects the solubility of CO2 and various impurity gases in water but also influences the solubility of impurities in CO2. Additionally, it can alter the morphology of corrosion products, thereby exerting a complex influence on the corrosion behavior of steel in supercritical CO2 environment. For different corrosive environments and materials, the variation trend in the corrosion rate of steel with pressure does not follow a consistent pattern.

4. Corrosion of Welded Joints in Supercritical CO2 Environments

Welded joints are among the most susceptible components in pipeline systems. During the welding process, these joints experience a welding heat cycle, with heating and cooling occurring in an extremely non-uniform manner across different regions. The microstructural changes in the weld and heat-affected zones, along with the heterogeneity of welding materials, contribute to the vulnerability of these joints to corrosion [84,85,86,87].
Ding et al. [88] investigated the corrosion mechanism in different regions of the X 65 welded joints in CO2/SO2 saturated aqueous solution. They found that SO2 and its hydrates were more inclined to adsorb in the BM and generate FeS product films, while the WM exhibited the poorest adsorption. This can be attributed to the differences in microstructure between the base material (BM), heat-affected zones (HAZ), and weld metal (WM), which result in varying formation of corrosion product films on the surfaces. Bai et al. [89] argue that welds and heat-affected zones (HAZs) are the most susceptible areas to failure in welded joints within the pipeline transportation of the oil and gas industry. Given that welding is inevitable in supercritical CO2 long-distance transportation pipelines, the corrosion behavior and protective measures for welded joints in supercritical CO2 environments become particularly critical. Regarding the research on welded joints, Lu et al. [90] investigated the early corrosion behavior of carbon steel welded joints in water-saturated CO2 oil fields. They discovered that the early corrosion characteristics of different regions within the welded joints were influenced by grain orientation but not by grain size, grain boundary type, or secondary phases. Yan et al. [91] investigated the corrosion behavior of X80 welded joints under conditions of 40 °C and 10 MPa water-saturated supercritical CO2. They found that the corrosion behavior varied due to differences in microstructure among the BM, fine-grained heat-affected zone (FGHAZ), coarse-grained heat-affected zone (CGHAZ), and WM. Specifically, FGHAZ and CGHAZ exhibited higher proportions of pearlite and more severe corrosion, while BM and WM, which contained higher ferrite content, experienced relatively mild corrosion. As shown in Figure 12, the surfaces of these different regions were covered with FeCO3 crystals, but the extent of coverage differed. The FeCO3 islands were larger on the surface of FGHAZ, whereas they were smaller but more numerous on the surfaces of BM and WM. CGHAZ showed the most severe corrosion, forming multilayer polycrystalline FeCO3 films that almost completely covered the specimen surface. There were numerous pores observed on both the FeCO3 islands on the sample surface in each zone, as indicated by the red frame, which could potentially serve as initiation sites for local corrosion. Yao et al. [92] also observed that, after 120 h of corrosion at 40 °C and 10 MPa, the corrosion levels of the X80 base metal and weld area were similar, with FGHAZ experiencing the least corrosion and CGHAZ showing the most severe corrosion. Additionally, the local corrosion depth of the joint was greater. The variation in chemical composition was identified as the primary factor responsible for the differing early corrosion behaviors across various regions of the welded joints.
Although research on welded joints in CO2 environments has reached a relatively mature stage, studies focusing on welded joints in supercritical CO2 conditions remain limited. The existing research primarily concentrates on the differences in corrosion product forms across various regions of the X80 welded joint, but lacks a detailed examination of corrosion rates and the associated corrosion mechanisms in welded joints. Currently, there is limited research available regarding the corrosion behavior of welded joints across different steel grades, as well as the influence of various types and concentrations of impurities on the welded joints in supercritical CO2 transmission pipelines.

5. Conclusions

The CCUS project is a large-scale system, and therefore investigating corrosion in supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation is crucial for ensuring operational safety.
  • When H2O is present in supercritical CO2 systems, gas impurities react with water to form corrosive products. Extensive studies have demonstrated that the corrosion rate increases significantly once the water content surpasses a specific critical threshold. However, the critical water content varies among different corrosion systems and materials. Under identical water content conditions, the localized corrosion rate can be several dozen times higher than the average corrosion rate. Controlling water content is crucial for mitigating pipeline corrosion. Compared to the average corrosion rate, taking the local corrosion rate into account is more reasonable for controlling water content in supercritical CO2 fluids. It is crucial to emphasize the impact of water content on the localized corrosion behavior of pipeline steel in future research.
  • A small amount of O2 accelerates the corrosion of steel; however, at high concentrations, O2 can induce passivation of the substrate, thereby significantly reducing the corrosion rate. O2 can facilitate local corrosion of steel in supercritical CO2 environments and significantly influence the rapid progression of localized corrosion. Acidic gases, such as H2S, SO2 and NO2, can accelerate the corrosion rate of steel, and their influence on the corrosion behavior of steel in the water phase is significantly greater than that in the CO2 phase. Among these gases, NO2 exhibits the most significant impact, often leading to localized corrosion. H2S and SO2 do not accelerate the localized corrosion rate of steel. When various types of gas impurities are present, the composition of corrosion products becomes more complex, and the corrosion products form a multi-layer structure. The synergistic effects of multiple impurities are more detrimental than those of individual impurities, and water content plays a crucial role in multi-impurity systems. The influence of the synergistic effect of multiple impurities on the corrosion behavior of pipeline steel requires further investigation and merits considerable attention.
  • Temperature and pressure significantly influence the formation and properties of corrosion product films. Numerous studies have demonstrated that, within a specific temperature range, elevated temperatures can promote the densification of corrosion product films, thereby enhancing the protective effect on the substrate surface. Moreover, the effects of pressure exhibit variability across different systems. The corrosion rate of steel increases with the flow velocity of supercritical CO2 fluid, and the dynamic flow of the fluid can lead to localized corrosion of steel. The morphology and structure of the corrosion products evolve as the corrosion time increases.
  • Research on welded joints of pipeline steel in the supercritical CO2 environment remains relatively limited. Existing studies indicate that distinct morphologies of corrosion products form in the HAZ, WM, and BM of X80 welded joints under supercritical CO2 conditions. However, a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the corrosion mechanism remains insufficient. Specifically, there is a lack of comprehensive investigation into the influence of water content and impurity gases on the corrosion behavior of different pipeline steel welded joints.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.G. and Y.Z.; investigation, Z.L. and R.P.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.L.; writing—review and editing, Q.G. and Y.Z.; funding acquisition, Q.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Opening Fund of Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Friction Welding Technology (20200101).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ren, S.; Jiao, X.; Zheng, D.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, H.; Guo, Z. Demand and Fluctuation Range of China’s Coal Production under the Dual Carbon Target. Energy Rep. 2024, 11, 3267–3282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wen, W.; Su, Y.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Hu, Y.; Ben, Y.; Qu, S. Evaluating Carbon Emissions Reduction Compliance Based on “dual Control” Policies of Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions in China. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 367, 121990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhu, H.; Cao, S.; Su, Z.; Zhuang, Y. China’s Future Energy Vision: Multi-Scenario Simulation Based on Energy Consumption Structure under Dual Carbon Targets. Energy 2024, 301, 131751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, W.; Chen, X.; Tian, J. The Evolutionary Analysis of Investment in CCS-EOR under Dual Carbon Target—From the Perspective of Multi-Agent Involvement. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2024, 135, 104107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dou, L.; Sun, L.; Lyu, W.; Wang, M.; Gao, F.; Gao, M.; Jiang, H. Trend of Global Carbon Dioxide Capture, Utilization and Storage Industry and Challenges and Countermeasures in China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2023, 50, 1246–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, W.; Guang, Y.; Liu, W.; Shen, K.; Huffman, M.; Wang, Q. Experimental Investigation of Stress Corrosion on Supercritical CO2 Transportation Pipelines against Leakage for CCUS Applications. Energy Rep. 2023, 9, 266–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Global Status of CCS 2024. Available online: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/global-status-report/ (accessed on 23 January 2025).
  8. Kim, T.W.; Yoon, H.C.; Lee, J.Y. Review on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) from Source to Sink; Part 1: Essential Aspects for CO2 Pipeline Transportation. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2024, 137, 104208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peletiri, S.P.; Rahmanian, N.; Mujtaba, I.M. CO2 Pipeline Design: A Review. Energies 2018, 11, 2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Miao, L.; Feng, L.; Ma, Y. Comprehensive Evaluation of CCUS Technology: A Case Study of China’s First Million-Tonne CCUS-EOR Project. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2025, 110, 107684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, L.; Rui, W.; Zhao, Q.M.; Zhou, Y.L.; Xin, F.; Xue, Z.J. CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery with CO2 Utilization and Storage: Progress and Practical Applications in China. Unconv. Resour. 2024, 4, 100096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sarrade, S.; Feron, D.; Rouillard, F.; Perrin, S.; Robin, R.; Ruiz, J.-C.; Turc, H.-A. Overview on Corrosion in Supercritical Fluids. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2017, 120, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bacca, K.R.G.; Lopes, N.F.; Batista, G.d.S.; dos Santos, C.A.; Costa, E.M.d. Electrochemical, Mechanical, and Tribological Properties of Corrosion Product Scales Formed on X65 Steel under CO2 Supercritical Pressure Environments. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 446, 128789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Eldevik, F.; Graver, B.; Torbergsen, L.E.; Saugerud, O.T. Development of a Guideline for Safe, Reliable and Cost Efficient Transmission of CO2 in Pipelines. Energy Procedia 2009, 1, 1579–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Z.M.; Song, G.L.; Zhang, J. Corrosion Control in CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery From a Perspective of Multiphase Fluids. Front. Mater. 2019, 6, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Luo, X.; Wang, M.; Oko, E.; Okezue, C. Simulation-Based Techno-Economic Evaluation for Optimal Design of CO2 Transport Pipeline Network. Appl. Energy 2014, 132, 610–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. El-Kady, A.H.; Amin, M.T.; Khan, F.; El-Halwagi, M.M. Analysis of CO2 Pipeline Regulations from a Safety Perspective for Offshore Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS). J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 439, 140734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nath, F.; Mahmood, M.N.; Yousuf, N. Recent Advances in CCUS: A Critical Review on Technologies, Regulatory Aspects and Economics. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2024, 238, 212726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, C.; Xiang, Y.; Song, C.; Ji, Z. Assessing the Corrosion Product Scale Formation Characteristics of X80 Steel in Supercritical CO2-H2O Binary Systems with Flue Gas and NaCl Impurities Relevant to CCUS Technology. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 146, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Q.K.; Kutana, A.; Penev, E.S.; Yakobson, B.I. Iron Corrosion in the “Inert” Supercritical CO2, Ab Initio Dynamics Insights: How Impurities Matter. Matter 2022, 5, 751–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hua, Y.; Barker, R.; Charpentier, T.; Ward, M.; Neville, A. Relating Iron Carbonate Morphology to Corrosion Characteristics for Water-Saturated Supercritical CO2 Systems. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2015, 98, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, G.A.; Zeng, Y.; Guo, X.P.; Jiang, F.; Shi, D.Y.; Chen, Z.Y. Electrochemical Corrosion Behavior of Carbon Steel under Dynamic High Pressure H2S/CO2 Environment. Corros. Sci. 2012, 65, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xiang, Y.; Xu, M.; Choi, Y.S. State-of-the-Art Overview of Pipeline Steel Corrosion in Impure Dense CO2 for CCS Transportation: Mechanisms and Models. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 485–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. NACE Standard RP0775-2005; Standard Recommended Practice: Preparation, Installation, Analysis, and Interpretation of Corrosion Coupons in Oilfield Operations. NACE International: Houston, TX, USA, 2005.
  25. Xiang, Y.; Song, C.; Li, C.; Yao, E.; Yan, W. Characterization of 13Cr Steel Corrosion in Simulated EOR-CCUS Environment with Flue Gas Impurities. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2020, 140, 124–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ma, G. Corrosion Behavior of N80 Steel in Underground Supercritical CO2 Environments. Chem. Tech. Fuels Oils 2024, 60, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Simonsen, K.R.; Hansen, D.S.; Pedersen, S. Challenges in CO2 Transportation: Trends and Perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 191, 114149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Slavchov, R.I.; Iqbal, M.H.; Faraji, S.; Madden, D.; Sonke, J.; Clarke, S.M. Corrosion Maps: Stability and Composition Diagrams for Corrosion Problems in CO2 Transport. Corros. Sci. 2024, 236, 112204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Chen, Z.F.; Li, Y.X. Integrity Assessment of Supercritical CO2 Transport Pipelines. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2023, 221, 211355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fu, L.; Ren, Z.; Si, W.; Ma, Q.; Huang, W.; Liao, K.; Huang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Xu, P. Research Progress on CO2 Capture and Utilization Technology. J. CO2 Util. 2022, 66, 102260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jayakumar, A.; Gomez, A.; Mahinpey, N. Post-Combustion CO2 Capture Using Solid K2CO3: Discovering the Carbonation Reaction Mechanism. Appl. Energy 2016, 179, 531–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, K.; Zeng, Y. Advancing the Mechanistic Understanding of Corrosion in Supercritical CO2 with H2O and O2 Impurities. Corros. Sci. 2023, 213, 110981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yan, T.; Xu, L.-C.; Zeng, Z.-X.; Pan, W.-G. Mechanism and Anti-Corrosion Measures of Carbon Dioxide Corrosion in CCUS: A Review. iScience 2024, 27, 108594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cui, G.; Yang, Z.; Liu, J.; Li, Z. A Comprehensive Review of Metal Corrosion in a Supercritical CO2 Environment. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2019, 90, 102814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jiang, X.; Qu, D.; Song, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y. Critical Water Content for Corrosion of X65 Mild Steel in Gaseous, Liquid and Supercritical CO2 Stream. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2019, 85, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hua, Y.; Barker, R.; Neville, A. Comparison of Corrosion Behaviour for X-65 Carbon Steel in Supercritical CO2-Saturated Water and Water-Saturated/Unsaturated Supercritical CO2. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2015, 97, 224–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, G.Y.; Fan, X.X.; Wang, C.L.; Zhao, X.F.; Meng, L.; Hu, Q.H.; Li, Y.X. Study on the pitting corrosion behavior of X65 steel in supercritical and dense-phase CO2 based on in-situ electrochemical noise measurement. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2025, 197, 107060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xiang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yang, X.; Li, Z.; Ni, W. The Upper Limit of Moisture Content for Supercritical CO2 Pipeline Transport. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2012, 67, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, J.; Yao, D.; Chen, K.; Wang, C.; Sun, C.; Pan, H.; Meng, F.; Chen, B.; Wang, L. Effect of H2O Content on the Corrosion Behavior of X52 Steel in Supercritical CO2 Streams Containing O2, H2S, SO2 and NO2 Impurities. Energies 2023, 16, 6119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sun, C.; Sun, J.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y. Effect of Water Content on the Corrosion Behavior of X65 Pipeline Steel in Supercritical CO2-H2O-O2-H2S-SO2 Environment as Relevant to CCS Application. Corros. Sci. 2018, 137, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, M.; Li, W.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, X.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z. Effect of Pressure on Corrosion Behavior of X60, X65, X70, and X80 Carbon Steels in Water-Unsaturated Supercritical CO2 Environments. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2016, 51, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hua, Y.; Barker, R.; Neville, A. The Effect of O2 Content on the Corrosion Behaviour of X65 and 5Cr in Water-Containing Supercritical CO2 Environments. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 356, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, M.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Li, Z. Effect of High-Concentration O2 on Corrosion Behavior of X70 Steel in Water-Containing Supercritical CO2 with SO2. Corrosion 2016, 73, 290–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Barker, R.; Hua, Y.; Neville, A. Internal Corrosion of Carbon Steel Pipelines for Dense-Phase CO2 Transport in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)—A Review. Int. Mater. Rev. 2017, 62, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. NACE Standard RP0775-2023; Standard Recommended Practice: Preparation, Installation, Analysis, and Interpretation of Corrosion Coupons in Hydrocarbon Operations. NACE International: Houston, TX, USA, 2023.
  46. He, L.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, W.; Wang, Y.; Wang, M.; Huang, Y.; Xu, Y. Unraveling Short-Term O2 Contamination on under Deposit Corrosion of X65 Pipeline Steel in CO2 Saturated Solution. Corros. Sci. 2024, 233, 112113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sun, J.; Sun, C.; Wang, Y. Effects of O2 and SO2 on Water Chemistry Characteristics and Corrosion Behavior of X70 Pipeline Steel in Supercritical CO2 Transport System. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 2365–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Basilico, E.; Marcelin, S.; Mingant, R.; Kittel, J.; Fregonese, M.; Barker, R.; Owen, J.; Neville, A.; Ropital, F. Effect of O2 Contamination on Carbon Steel Pseudo-Passive Scales in CO2 Aqueous Solutions. Corros. Sci. 2022, 205, 110388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, Y.Y.; Jiang, Z.N.; Zhang, Q.H.; Lei, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, G.A. Unveiling the Influential Mechanism of O2 on the Corrosion of N80 Carbon Steel under Dynamic Supercritical CO2 Conditions. Corros. Sci. 2022, 205, 110436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tang, Y.; Guo, X.P.; Zhang, G.A. Corrosion Behaviour of X65 Carbon Steel in Supercritical-CO2 Containing H2O and O2 in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Technology. Corros. Sci. 2017, 118, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, W.; Shen, K.; Tang, S.; Shen, R.; Parker, T.; Wang, Q. Synergistic Effect of O2 and SO2 Gas Impurities on X70 Steel Corrosion in Water-Saturated Supercritical CO2. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2019, 130, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Visser, E.; Hendriks, C.; Barrio, M.; Mølnvik, M.J.; Koeijer, G.; Liljemark, S.; Le Gallo, Y. Dynamis CO2 Quality Recommendations. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2008, 2, 478–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, K.; Zeng, Y.; Luo, J.L. Influence of H2S on the General Corrosion and Sulfide Stress Cracking of Pipelines Steels for Supercritical CO2 Transportation. Corros. Sci. 2021, 190, 109639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sun, C.; Ding, T.; Sun, J.; Lin, X.; Zhao, W.; Chen, H. Insights into the Effect of H2S on the Corrosion Behavior of N80 Steel in Supercritical CO2 Environment. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 26, 5462–5477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sun, C.; Sun, J.; Luo, J.L. Unlocking the Impurity-Induced Pipeline Corrosion Based on Phase Behavior of Impure CO2 Streams. Corros. Sci. 2020, 165, 108367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jou, F.; Carroll, J.; Mather, A.; Otto, F. Solubility of Mixtures of Hydrogen-Sulfide and Carbon-Dioxide in Aqueous N-Methyldiethanolamine Solutions. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1993, 38, 75–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wei, L.; Pang, X.; Gao, K. Corrosion of Low Alloy Steel and Stainless Steel in Supercritical CO2/H2O/H2S Systems. Corros. Sci. 2016, 111, 637–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wei, L.; Pang, X.; Gao, K. Effect of Small Amount of H2S on the Corrosion Behavior of Carbon Steel in the Dynamic Supercritical CO2 Environments. Corros. Sci. 2016, 103, 132–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, Y.; Wang, B.; He, S.; Zhang, L.; Xing, X.; Li, H.; Lu, M. Unraveling the Effect of H2S on the Corrosion Behavior of High Strength Sulfur-Resistant Steel in CO2/H2S/Cl Environments at Ultra High Temperature and High Pressure. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2022, 100, 104477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sun, C.; Liu, J.; Sun, J.; Lin, X.; Wang, Y. Probing the Initial Corrosion Behavior of X65 Steel in CCUS-EOR Environments with Impure Supercritical CO2 Fluids. Corros. Sci. 2021, 189, 109585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xiang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Xu, C.; Zhou, C.; Li, Z.; Ni, W. Impact of SO2 Concentration on the Corrosion Rate of X70 Steel and Iron in Water-Saturated Supercritical CO2 Mixed with SO2. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2011, 58, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hua, Y.; Barker, R.; Neville, A. The Influence of SO2 on the Tolerable Water Content to Avoid Pipeline Corrosion during the Transportation of Supercritical CO2. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2015, 37, 412–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, C.; Xiang, Y.; Wang, R.T.; Yuan, J.; Xu, Y.H.; Li, W.G.; Zheng, Z.G. Exploring the inffuence of ffue gas impurities on the electrochemical corrosion mechanism of X80 steel in a supercritical CO2-saturated aqueous environment. Corros. Sci. 2023, 211, 110899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sun, C.; Sun, J.; Wang, Y.; Lin, X.; Li, X.; Cheng, X.; Liu, H. Synergistic Effect of O2, H2S and SO2 Impurities on the Corrosion Behavior of X65 Steel in Water-Saturated Supercritical CO2 System. Corros. Sci. 2016, 107, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jiang, X.; Song, X.L.; Yu, C.; Xie, H.; Qu, D.R.; Hua, J. Investigation of SO2-induced corrosion of X65 steel in gaseous, liquid, and supercritical CO2 environments through experimental and thermodynamic approaches. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2025, 221, 106574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mahlobo, M.G.R.; Premlall, K.; Olubambi, P.A. Effect of Exposure Time with SO2 as an Impurity on the Corrosion Behaviour of Pipeline Steel in CCS Transportation. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Morland, B.; Truls, N.; Tjelta, M.; Svenningsen, G. Effect of SO2, O2, NO2, and H2O Concentrations on Chemical Reactions and Corrosion of Carbon Steel in Dense Phase CO2. Corrosion 2019, 75, 1327–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dugstad, A.; Halseid, M.; Morland, B. Effect of SO2 and NO2 on Corrosion and Solid Formation in Dense Phase CO2 Pipelines. Energy Procedia 2013, 37, 2877–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sun, C.; Wang, Y.; Sun, J.; Lin, X.; Li, X.; Liu, H.; Cheng, X. Effect of Impurity on the Corrosion Behavior of X65 Steel in Water-Saturated Supercritical CO2 System. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2016, 116, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sun, C.; Yan, X.; Sun, J.; Pang, J.; Zhao, W.; Lin, X. Unraveling the Effect of O2, NO2 and SO2 Impurities on the Stress Corrosion Behavior of X65 Steel in Water-Saturated Supercritical CO2 Streams. Corros. Sci. 2022, 209, 110729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kairy, S.K.; Zhou, S.; Turnbull, A.; Hinds, G. Corrosion of Pipeline Steel in Dense Phase CO2 Containing Impurities: A Critical Review of Test Methodologies. Corros. Sci. 2023, 214, 110986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Honarvar Nazari, M.; Allahkaram, S.R.; Kermani, M.B. The Effects of Temperature and pH on the Characteristics of Corrosion Product in CO2 Corrosion of Grade X70 Steel. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 3559–3563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sui, P.; Sun, J.; Hua, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y. Effect of Temperature and Pressure on Corrosion Behavior of X65 Carbon Steel in Water-Saturated CO2 Transport Environments Mixed with H2S. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2018, 73, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hua, Y.; Barker, R.; Neville, A. Effect of Temperature on the Critical Water Content for General and Localised Corrosion of X65 Carbon Steel in the Transport of Supercritical CO2. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2014, 31, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Gan, M.; Su, X.; Wang, Y.; Xue, Q.; Mei, K.; Fu, X. Temperature and Reaction Time’s Effects on N80 Steel Corrosion Behavior in Supercritical CO2 and Formation Water Environments. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Azevedo Rodrigues, T.R.S.; Marcolino, J.B.; Moraes, M.K.; Lopes, N.F.; Costa, E.M. Influence of CO2 Subcritical and Supercritical Pressures on the Protective Properties of Corrosion Product Scales Formed on X65 Steel. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2024, 206, 106184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, W.; Pots, B.F.M.; Brown, B.; Kee, K.E.; Nesic, S. A Direct Measurement of Wall Shear Stress in Multiphase Flow—Is It an Important Parameter in CO2 Corrosion of Carbon Steel Pipelines? Corros. Sci. 2016, 110, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wei, L.; Pang, X.; Gao, K. Effect of Flow Rate on Localized Corrosion of X70 Steel in Supercritical CO2 Environments. Corros. Sci. 2018, 136, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zeng, L.; Lv, T.; Chen, H.; Ma, T.; Fang, Z.; Shi, J. Flow Accelerated Corrosion of X65 Steel Gradual Contraction Pipe in High CO2 Partial Pressure Environments. Arab. J. Chem. 2023, 16, 104935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, Y.; Liu, D.; Zhu, G.; Zhang, G. Effects of temperature and flow rate on the corrosion behavior of N80 carbon steel in supercritical CO2 environment (China). Surf. Technol. 2020, 49, 35–41. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, Y.; Wang, B.; Xing, X.; He, S.; Zhang, L.; Lu, M. Effects of Flow Velocity on the Corrosion Behaviour of Super 13Cr Stainless Steel in Ultra-HTHP CO2-H2S Coexistence Environment. Corros. Sci. 2022, 200, 110235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, X.; Yang, P.; Li, R.; Tong, G.; Chen, J.; Wang, Y. Investigation of Supercritical CO2 Corrosion Behavior of X80 Carbon Steel in Pipelines: An in Situ Experimental and DFT Study. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2024, 213, 106371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hua, Y.; Jonnalagadda, R.; Zhang, L.; Neville, A.; Barker, R. Assessment of General and Localized Corrosion Behavior of X65 and 13Cr Steels in Water-Saturated Supercritical CO2 Environments with SO2/O2. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2017, 64, 126–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, L.W.; Liu, Z.Y.; Cui, Z.Y.; Du, C.W.; Wang, X.H.; Li, X.G. In Situ Corrosion Characterization of Simulated Weld Heat Affected Zone on API X80 Pipeline Steel. Corros. Sci. 2014, 85, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sharma, S.K.; Maheshwari, S. A Review on Welding of High Strength Oil and Gas Pipeline Steels. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2017, 38, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, S.; Yang, F.; Jia, H.; Chen, C.; Feng, Q.; Dai, L.; Zhang, Z. Study on the Effect of Microstructure on Toughness Dispersion of X70 Steel Girth Weld. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2024, 164, 108671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Li, J.; Wang, D.; Xie, F. Failure Analysis of CO2 Corrosion of Natural Gas Pipeline under Flowing Conditions. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2022, 137, 106265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ding, H.X.; Xiang, Y.; Lu, W.P.; Yan, K.; Ren, J.R.; Yan, W.; Yao, E.D.; Zhao, X.H. Selective adsorption and corrosion mechanism of SO2 and its hydrates on X65 welded joints steel in CO2-saturated aqueous solution. Corros. Sci. 2024, 238, 112373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bai, F.; Ding, H.; Tong, L.; Pan, L. Microstructure and Properties of the Interlayer Heat-Affected Zone in X80 Pipeline Girth Welds. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2020, 30, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lu, Y.; Xu, L. Early Corrosion Stage of Welded Carbon Steel Joints in CO2-Saturated Oilfield Water. Mater. Test. 2020, 62, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yan, Y.; Deng, H.; Xiao, W.; Ou, T.; Cao, X. Corrosion Behaviour of X80 Pipeline Steel Welded Joint in H2O-Saturated Supercritical-CO2 Environment. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2020, 15, 1713–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yao, B.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Yan, Y.; Deng, H.; Lan, W. Effect of Microstructure of Welded Joint of X80 pipeline Steel on Its Corrosion Behaviors in Supercritical CO2 (China). Corros. Prot. 2022, 43, 36–41. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Pure CO2 phase diagram [14].
Figure 1. Pure CO2 phase diagram [14].
Materials 18 02424 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of corrosion.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of corrosion.
Materials 18 02424 g002
Figure 3. (a) The variation in the corrosion rates of X70 steel with relative humidity [38]; (b) Variations in corrosion rate of X52 steel with H2O content exposed to supercritical CO2 steams containing the impurities of O2, H2S, SO2 and NO2 at 10 MPa and 50 °C for 72 h [39]; (c) Variation in water content on corrosion rate of X65 at 50 °C and 10 MPa [40].
Figure 3. (a) The variation in the corrosion rates of X70 steel with relative humidity [38]; (b) Variations in corrosion rate of X52 steel with H2O content exposed to supercritical CO2 steams containing the impurities of O2, H2S, SO2 and NO2 at 10 MPa and 50 °C for 72 h [39]; (c) Variation in water content on corrosion rate of X65 at 50 °C and 10 MPa [40].
Materials 18 02424 g003
Figure 4. Corrosion rates for pipeline steels exposed to various water contents [35,36,37,39,40,41].
Figure 4. Corrosion rates for pipeline steels exposed to various water contents [35,36,37,39,40,41].
Materials 18 02424 g004
Figure 5. (a1) Corrosion rate of X65 carbon steel in water-saturated SC-CO2 phase without and with O2 for 96 h; (a2) Polarization curves of X65 carbon steel after corrosion in supercritical water-saturated CO2 phase without and with O2 for 96 h; (a3) EIS Nyquist and (a4) Bode plots (measured at open circuit potential) of X65 carbon steel in supercritical Water-saturated CO2 phase without and with O2 in the initial stage [50]; (b1) General corrosion rates of X65 carbon steel and 5Cr in supercritical water-saturated dense phase CO2 at 80 bar and 35 ◦C for an exposure time of 48 h at different O2 content (0, 20, 500 and 1000 ppm) and (b2) Local corrosion rates of X65 carbon steel and 5Cr in supercritical water-saturated CO2 phase at 80 bar and 35 °C for an exposure time of 48 h at different O2 content (0, 20, 500 and 1000 ppm) [42].
Figure 5. (a1) Corrosion rate of X65 carbon steel in water-saturated SC-CO2 phase without and with O2 for 96 h; (a2) Polarization curves of X65 carbon steel after corrosion in supercritical water-saturated CO2 phase without and with O2 for 96 h; (a3) EIS Nyquist and (a4) Bode plots (measured at open circuit potential) of X65 carbon steel in supercritical Water-saturated CO2 phase without and with O2 in the initial stage [50]; (b1) General corrosion rates of X65 carbon steel and 5Cr in supercritical water-saturated dense phase CO2 at 80 bar and 35 ◦C for an exposure time of 48 h at different O2 content (0, 20, 500 and 1000 ppm) and (b2) Local corrosion rates of X65 carbon steel and 5Cr in supercritical water-saturated CO2 phase at 80 bar and 35 °C for an exposure time of 48 h at different O2 content (0, 20, 500 and 1000 ppm) [42].
Materials 18 02424 g005
Figure 6. Corrosion rates for pipeline steels exposed to various O2 content [42,43,47,51].
Figure 6. Corrosion rates for pipeline steels exposed to various O2 content [42,43,47,51].
Materials 18 02424 g006
Figure 7. (a) SEM of three steels after scale removal [57]; (b) Corrosion rate of N80 steel was investigated under supercritical CO2-H2S environments at 80 bar and 80 °C for 72 h, with varying H2S pressures [54].
Figure 7. (a) SEM of three steels after scale removal [57]; (b) Corrosion rate of N80 steel was investigated under supercritical CO2-H2S environments at 80 bar and 80 °C for 72 h, with varying H2S pressures [54].
Materials 18 02424 g007
Figure 8. (a) Schematic diagram of the corrosion models of X70 steel in water-saturated supercritical CO2; (b) SEM surface morphologies of corroded X70 steel in water-saturated supercritical CO2 with different gas impurities; and (c) XRD results of X70 steel in water-saturated supercritical CO2 with different gas impurities (40 °C, 100 bar) [51].
Figure 8. (a) Schematic diagram of the corrosion models of X70 steel in water-saturated supercritical CO2; (b) SEM surface morphologies of corroded X70 steel in water-saturated supercritical CO2 with different gas impurities; and (c) XRD results of X70 steel in water-saturated supercritical CO2 with different gas impurities (40 °C, 100 bar) [51].
Materials 18 02424 g008
Figure 9. (a) General corrosion rate and 1/Rp of X80 steel immersed in water-rich phases containing O2, SO2 or NO2 at 8 MPa and 35 °C for 48 h; (b) Polarization curve of X80 steel immersed in water-rich phases containing O2, SO2 or NO2 at 8 MPa and 35 °C for 48 h; and (c) SEM surface and cross-sectional morphology of X80 steel immersed in the water-rich phase containing O2, SO2 or NO2 at 8 MPa and 35 °C for 48 h [63].
Figure 9. (a) General corrosion rate and 1/Rp of X80 steel immersed in water-rich phases containing O2, SO2 or NO2 at 8 MPa and 35 °C for 48 h; (b) Polarization curve of X80 steel immersed in water-rich phases containing O2, SO2 or NO2 at 8 MPa and 35 °C for 48 h; and (c) SEM surface and cross-sectional morphology of X80 steel immersed in the water-rich phase containing O2, SO2 or NO2 at 8 MPa and 35 °C for 48 h [63].
Materials 18 02424 g009
Figure 10. Distribution of the key elements at the surfaces of N80 steel samples determined by means of EDS linear scanning (along the white lines) after immersion experiments at 40 °C, 80 °C and 120 °C for 7 days [75].
Figure 10. Distribution of the key elements at the surfaces of N80 steel samples determined by means of EDS linear scanning (along the white lines) after immersion experiments at 40 °C, 80 °C and 120 °C for 7 days [75].
Materials 18 02424 g010
Figure 11. General corrosion rate of steel after exposure to CO2 medium at subcritical and supercritical pressures (a) wet CO2; (b) CO2-saturated water [76].
Figure 11. General corrosion rate of steel after exposure to CO2 medium at subcritical and supercritical pressures (a) wet CO2; (b) CO2-saturated water [76].
Materials 18 02424 g011
Figure 12. SEM surface morphologies of the X80 welded joint after corrosion in a water-saturated supercritical CO2 phase for 120 h: (a,b) BM; (c,d) FGHAZ; (e,f) CGHAZ; and (g,h) WM [91].
Figure 12. SEM surface morphologies of the X80 welded joint after corrosion in a water-saturated supercritical CO2 phase for 120 h: (a,b) BM; (c,d) FGHAZ; (e,f) CGHAZ; and (g,h) WM [91].
Materials 18 02424 g012
Table 1. Corrosion behavior of steel under different water content conditions.
Table 1. Corrosion behavior of steel under different water content conditions.
MaterialsPressures
(MPa)
Temperature
(°C)
Water ContentOther
Impurities
Test
Period
(h)
Corrosion Rate
(mm/y)
Local
Corrosion Rate (mm/y)
Reference
X658352029 ppm (60% RH) 336<0.02 [35]
72<0.1
2705 ppm (80% RH)
3382 ppm (water-saturated CO2 phase)
CO2-saturated water phase1
X65850700 ppm, 1600 ppm 48No measurable corrosionNo measurable corrosion[36]
2650 ppm0.0140.2
3400 ppm (water-saturated CO2 phase)0.0241.4
300 mL (CO2-saturated water phase)964.1
X65835500 ppmv 720.00610.137[37]
1000 ppmv0.01030.322
2000 ppmv0.02590.697
3000 ppmv0.02980.825
5000 ppmv0.03981.127
X7010500.95 g (50% RH)SO2 2.0 mol%, O2 1000 ppm1200.0387 [38]
1.32 g (70% RH)0.3–0.4
1.67 g (88% RH)0.8–0.9
3 g (100% RH)1.4–1.5
X52105020 ppmvO2 200 ppmv, H2S 200 ppmv, SO2 200 ppmv720.0199 [39]
100 ppmv0.0234
1000 ppmv0.2671
4333 ppmv (water-saturated CO2 phase)0.2838
X651050200 ppmvO2 200 ppmv, H2S 200 ppmv, SO2 200 ppmv720.0036 [40]
1500 ppmv0.0224
2000 ppmv0.1752
4333 ppmv (water-saturated CO2 phase)0.5546
X60, X65, X70, X808501600 ppm SO2 3000 ppm, O2 1000 ppm720.025–0.060.2–3.25[41]
2600 ppm, 3000 ppm0.1–0.31
101600 ppm, 2000 ppm, 2600 ppm<0.010.04–6.02
3000 ppm0.81–0.94
X65835300 ppm, 650 ppm, 1200 ppmO2 1000 ppm48No measurable corrosionNo measurable corrosion[42]
2800 ppm0.010–0.0140.8
34,000 ppm (water-saturated CO2 phase)0.033.1
34,000 ppm (water-saturated CO2 phase) 0.100.9
5Cr835300 ppm, 650 ppm, 1200 ppmO2 1000 ppm48No measurable corrosionNo measurable corrosion[42]
2800 ppm<0.010.7
34,000 ppm (water-saturated CO2 phase)0.022.2
34,000 ppm (water-saturated CO2 phase) 0.1250.3
X70105045% RHO2 0.1 mol%720.030.03[43]
60% RH0.1
75% RH0.90~1.5
88% RH~1.1~3
100% RH1.617.03
45% RHO2 1.0 mol%0.030.03
50% RH0.50
60% RH0.63
75% RH0.90
88% RH0.90–1.09
100% RH1.65.23
Table 2. Corrosion behavior of steel with various O2 content in supercritical CO2.
Table 2. Corrosion behavior of steel with various O2 content in supercritical CO2.
MaterialsPressures
(MPa)
Temperature (°C)EnvironmentO2
Content
Other
Impurities
Test Period (h)Corrosion Rate (mm/y)Local
Corrosion Rate (mm/y)
Corrosion ProductsReference
X65835water-saturated CO2 phase0 ppm 480.100.9FeCO3, Fe2O3, FeOOH,
Fe3O4
[42]
20 ppm0.0881.0–1.2
500 ppm0.072–0.0761.2–1.3
1000 ppm0.043
5Cr835water-saturated CO2 phase0 ppm 480.1250.3FeCO3, Fe2O3, Cr2O3, FeOOH, Cr(OH)3,
Fe3O4
[42]
20 ppm0.120–0.1240.5–0.6
500 ppm0.040–0.0441.0
1000 ppm0.022.2
X701050water-saturated CO2 phase0.1 mol%SO2 2 mol%721.617.03FeO
FeSO4∙xH2O
[43]
1.0 mol%1.65.23
2.0 mol%0.943.3
X701050water-saturated CO2 phase0 ppm 1200.014 FeCO3, Fe2O3[47]
1000 ppm0.027
10,000 ppm0.029
N80865simulated formation water phase0 bar 4827.86 FeCO3, Fe2O3, FeOOH[49]
5 bar13.15
X65850water-saturated CO2 phase0 mg/L 960.25 FeCO3, Fe2O3[50]
95 mg/L0.91
475 mg/L1.52
X701040water-saturated CO2 phase0 480.06 FeCO3[51]
200 ppmv0.09
1000 ppmv0.03Fe2O3
Table 3. Corrosion behavior of steel with various H2S content in supercritical CO2.
Table 3. Corrosion behavior of steel with various H2S content in supercritical CO2.
MaterialsPressures (MPa)Temperature (°C)Environment H2S ContentOther ImpuritiesTest Period (h) Corrosion Rate (mm/y)Local Corrosion Rate (mm/y)Corrosion ProductsReference
P1101080water-saturated CO2 phase 50 ppmv 240<0.20.52FeCO3, mackinawite, Cr(OH)3[57]
3Cr>0.40.84
316L00FeCO3, mackinawite
P110CO2-saturated water phase10.37<6FeCO3, mackinawite, pyrrhotie, Cr(OH)3
3Cr2.71<2
316L<0.02>0.024FeCO3, Cr(OH)3, nickel sulfide, mackinawite
X651080water-saturated CO2 phase0 2400.170.29FeCO3[58]
50 ppmv0.240.48FeCO3, Fe1−xS, Fe1+xS,
CO2-saturated NaCl solution0 ppmv8.469.19FeCO3
50 ppmv15.482.45FeCO3, FeS, Fe1−xS
Q12514.2140water-saturated CO2 phase1.33 KPa 1680.015 FeCO3, Fe1−xS, Cr(OH)3[59]
7.24 KPa0.041
CO2-saturated formation water phase1.33 KPa0.081
7.24 KPa0.051
X65850water-saturated CO2 phase0.08 barSO2 0.08 bar, O2 0.08 bar1.5>20 FeS, FeSO4∙xH2O, FeCO3[60]
722.57FeS, FeSO4∙xH2O, FeCO3, FeOOH, S
Table 4. Corrosion behavior of pipeline steel with various SO2 content in supercritical CO2.
Table 4. Corrosion behavior of pipeline steel with various SO2 content in supercritical CO2.
MaterialsPressures (MPa)Temperature (°C)EnvironmentSO2 ContentOther ImpuritiesTest Period
(h)
Corrosion Rate (mm/y)Corrosion ProductsReference
X701050water-saturated CO2 phase0 ppm 1200.014FeSO3, FeCO3, [47]
200 ppm0.269
600 ppm0.345
1000 ppm0.423
1000 ppmO2 1000 ppm0.842FeSO3,
FeSO4, FeCO3, FeOOH
X701040water-saturated CO2 phase500 ppmv 481.1FeSO3∙2H2O, FeCO3, FeOOH[51]
O2 200 ppmv1.24FeSO3∙2H2O, FeSO3∙3H2O, FeCO3, Fe2O3
O2 1000 ppmv0.6
X701050water-saturated CO2 phase0.2 mol%O2 1000 ppm2880.2FeSO4∙7H2O, [61]
0.7 mol%0.6–0.7FeSO4∙4H2O, FeSO3∙3H2O
1.4 mol%0.75–0.9FeSO4∙4H2O, α-FeOOH
2.0 mol%0.9FeSO4∙4H2O
X80835CO2-saturated water phase0 481.67FeCO3, Fe2O3[63]
5%3.08FeCO3,
FeSO3∙xH2O,
FeS
X651050water-saturated CO2 phase0 1200.015FeCO3,[64]
1000 ppmv0.469FeSO3
FeSO3∙xH2O, FeSO4∙4H2O, FeCO3, Fe2O3∙H2O
X65835water-saturated CO2 phase0 720.1FeCO3[65]
50 ppm0.37FeCO3
FeSO3∙3H2O
100 ppm0.72
carbon steel9.560CO2 phase0H2O 1000 ppm15120.00352FeCO3, α-FeOOH, Fe3O4[66]
0.50%0.3375γ-FeOOH
1.50%0.5–0.6
5%1.396FeCO3, FeSO3∙3H2O
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Z.; Gao, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Pan, R. Research Progress on Major Influencing Factors of Corrosion Behavior of Pipeline Steel in Supercritical CO2 Environment. Materials 2025, 18, 2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112424

AMA Style

Liu Z, Gao Q, Zhou Y, Pan R. Research Progress on Major Influencing Factors of Corrosion Behavior of Pipeline Steel in Supercritical CO2 Environment. Materials. 2025; 18(11):2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112424

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Zhe, Qian Gao, Yong Zhou, and Ruijuan Pan. 2025. "Research Progress on Major Influencing Factors of Corrosion Behavior of Pipeline Steel in Supercritical CO2 Environment" Materials 18, no. 11: 2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112424

APA Style

Liu, Z., Gao, Q., Zhou, Y., & Pan, R. (2025). Research Progress on Major Influencing Factors of Corrosion Behavior of Pipeline Steel in Supercritical CO2 Environment. Materials, 18(11), 2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112424

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop