Next Article in Journal
An Analysis of the Influence of DSC Parameters on the Measurement of the Thermal Properties of Phase-Change Material
Next Article in Special Issue
Large-Scale Metasurface Simulation Using Local-Segmented Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Study on Online Prediction of TP2 Rolled Copper Tube Wall Thickness Based on Different Proxy Models
Previous Article in Special Issue
Definition, Fabrication, and Compression Testing of Sandwich Structures with Novel TPMS-Based Cores
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Polarization-Insensitive Metasurface with High-Gain Large-Angle Beam Deflection

by
Huanran Qiu
1,2,†,
Liang Fang
3,†,
Rui Xi
1,2,4,*,†,
Yajie Mu
2,
Jiaqi Han
2,
Qiang Feng
2,
Ying Li
5,6,7,
Long Li
2,* and
Bin Zheng
5,6,7,*
1
Hangzhou Institute of Technology, Xidian University, Hangzhou 311231, China
2
Key Laboratory of High-Speed Circuit Design and EMC of Ministry of Education, School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China
3
The Research Institute for Special Structures of Aeronautical Composite AVIC, Innovation Center for Electromagnetic Functional Structure, Jinan 250023, China
4
National Key Laboratory of Radar Signal Processing, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China
5
State Key Laboratory of Extreme Photonics and Instrumentation, ZJU-Hangzhou Global Scientific and Technological Innovation Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
6
International Joint Innovation Center, The Electromagnetics Academy at Zhejiang University, Zhejiang University, Haining 314400, China
7
Jinhua Institute of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang University, Jinhua 321099, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Materials 2024, 17(23), 5688; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17235688
Submission received: 9 September 2024 / Revised: 31 October 2024 / Accepted: 12 November 2024 / Published: 21 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Metamaterials: Structure, Properties and Applications)

Abstract

:
Metasurfaces have shown great potential in achieving low-cost and low-complexity signal enhancement and redirection. Due to the low transmission power and high attenuation issues of current high-frequency communication technology, it is necessary to explore signal redirection technology based on metasurfaces. This paper presents an innovative metasurface for indoor signal enhancement and redirection, featuring thin thickness, high gain, and wide-angle deflection. The metasurface integrates the design principles of a Fabry–Perot cavity (FPC) theory with a Phase Gradient Partially Reflective Metasurface (PGPRM). Its unit is a fishnet structure with a substrate only 1/33 λ thin. Based on the precise phase control of the dual-layer PGPRM (with an inter-layer distance of 8 mm), the proposed metasurface can obtain phase coverage as small as 78° while achieving high-gain beam deflection as large as 47°. Simulation results show that within the band 8.6–9.2 GHz (6.7%), a single-layer metasurface can deflect the beam to 29° with a maximum gain of 16.9 dBi. In addition, it is also 360° polarization-insensitive in the xoy plane at 9 GHz with large-angle deflection characteristic retained. Moreover, cascading PGPRM can effectively improve the beam deflection angle. After analysis, the scheme with a double-layer spacing of 8 mm was ultimately selected. Simulation results show a double-layer metasurface can deflect the beam to 47° with a maximum gain of 16.4 dBi. This design provides an efficient and cost-effective solution for large-angle beam deflection with gain enhancement for indoor wireless communication.

1. Introduction

In modern wireless communication systems, the dramatic increase in the number of mobile devices and the growing demand for data transmission have made indoor wireless signal coverage and enhancement particularly important [1]. To solve this challenging problem, it is necessary to adopt Millimeter Wave (mmWave) communication solutions [2,3]. However, the millimeter wave signals used in 5G applications suffer severe through-wall losses in indoor environments [4,5,6]. Traditional solutions, such as increasing the number of base stations or boosting transmission power [7], often incur complex installation processes, and may lead to environmental pollution. Therefore, finding efficient and cost-effective methods for signal enhancement and redirection has become a research hotspot in wireless communication.
In recent years, metasurface technology has emerged as a significant research direction for wireless signal enhancement, owing to its unique capabilities for manipulating electromagnetic waves [8,9]. Metasurfaces can achieve flexible control of electromagnetic waves through phase, amplitude, refractive index, and polarization [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. This versatility enables potential applications of metasurfaces in wireless communication, particularly for achieving passive, high-gain signal with wide-angle coverage and directional control, offering distinct advantages.
Significant progress has been made in the research of enhancing signal gain and beam deflection over recent years. One effective approach is to utilize metamaterial with a gradient refractive index or high refractive index. This configuration allows the wave to continuously deflect as it propagates through the material, thus altering the direction of the outgoing wave [10,11]. According to Huygens’ principle, metasurfaces with negative refractive indices can also be employed to change the propagation direction of electromagnetic waves [12]. Modal synthesis represents another viable technique for generating tilted beams by combining multiple radiation modes on the aperture of the metasurface [13]. Additionally, metasurfaces designed with different operating states (transmission or reflection state) in different frequency bands can achieve high gain and beam deflection, separately [14]. Furthermore, integrating active devices allows for the management of the states of metasurface units, thereby enabling beam scanning [15,16,17]. The method of combining the Fabry–Perot resonant cavity theory and Phase Gradient Partially Reflective Metasurface to achieve high-gain beam deflection or beam convergence are adopted [18,19,20,21]. On the other hand, for applications in mobile communication and indoor communication, polarization insensitivity are indispensable factors. Most metasurfaces achieve polarization insensitivity by using fully symmetrical units and arrays [22]. Many other promising applications are also conducted creatively through phase-change materials, for example, a metasurface absorber with switchable bandwidth based on the phase-change material vanadium dioxide (VO2) [23].
Specifically, this paper employs the Fabry–Perot cavity (FPC) theory to enhance the gain and achieve polarization-insensitive characteristic based on a completely symmetrical unit structure. The antenna comprises a partially reflective surface (PRS) and a feeding antenna. This structure facilitates multiple reflections of electric field radiation between the PRS and the ground plane, resulting in constructive interference with the outgoing radiation wavefront, and thus effectively increases the gain of the antenna [24,25]. The optimal conditions for achieving high gain based on FPC theory at large-angle deflection are summarized in references [26,27].
Since Capasso et al. introduced the concept of abrupt phase shifts in Fermat’s principle in 2011 and derived the generalized Snell’s law [28], the Phase Gradient Partially Reflective Metasurface (PGPRM) has emerged as an effective method for achieving beam deflection by adjusting the phase distribution of the radiation aperture. This paper designs a Phase Gradient Partially Reflective Metasurface (PGPRM), which generates tilted main beams by adjusting radiation wavefront [18,29,30,31], thereby realizing beam deflection.
In this paper, we design a high-gain beam deflection antenna based on a PGPRM integrated with an FPC structure for indoor signal enhancement and redirection. By designing the metasurface with a fishnet structure, flexible control of antenna beam direction is enabled through phase manipulation across the metasurface aperture. Polarization sensitivity analysis shows that the metasurface exhibits consistent reflection characteristic and good isolation under 360° polarization directions, confirming the polarization-insensitive property. Consequently, the direction of beam deflection in the xoy plane remains aligned with the rotation direction of the PGPRM.
The primary contribution of this research lies in the performance and structure of the PGPRM, achieving high gain while demonstrating significant flexibility in beam direction control. It is believed that this simple, thin, passive, and efficient metasurface holds great potential for future wireless communication systems.

2. Design of PGPRM

This paper presents a PGPRM antenna based on the FPC theoretical model. The schematic diagram of the PGPRM antenna is shown in Figure 1. The electromagnetic waves radiated by the antenna undergo constructive interference within the Fabry–Perot cavity and are then deflected by the PGPRM upon emission. The schematic diagram of multiple reflections and deflection of electromagnetic waves is shown in Figure 2. The numbers in the figure are unit labels, where h represents the loading height of PGPRM. Under ideal conditions, electromagnetic waves are radiated from a radiation source, reflected infinitely in FPC, and then emitted through PGPRM. The electric field strength of the emitted electromagnetic waves is the superposition of multiple reflected electromagnetic waves [27]:
E = n = 0 f α E 0 p n 1 p 2 e j θ n ,
Among them,
θ n = n φ = n ( 4 π λ h cos α + φ P G P R M + φ G N D ) ,
In Equations (1) and (2), f α is the directional function of the field strength corresponding to the electromagnetic wave incident at angle α , θ n is phase difference in the n   t h radiated ray compared to the 0 t h ray, p is the reflection amplitude of PGPRM, and Simplified Equation (1) yields the following:
E = E 0 f α 1 p 2 1 + p 2 2 p cos ϕ ,
The energy density corresponding to the incident wave at angle α is as follows:
S = 1 p 2 1 + p 2 2 p cos φ P G P R M + φ G N D 4 π λ h cos α f 2 α ,
In Equation (4), where λ denotes wavelength at working frequency, the reflection coefficient of the PGPRM is φ P G P R M , and the reflection coefficient of the ground plane is φ G N D . According to Equations (1)–(4), the energy density of the cavity at angle α is the highest when the following resonance conditions are met:
h cos α = φ P G P R M + φ G N D 4 π λ + λ 2 N 1 2 ,
Increasing the number of layers in the PGPRM can effectively enhance the beam deflection angle. But as the number of cascaded layers increases, the loss also increases, which results in the gain decrease. Considering both the deflection angle and gain enhancement, a cascaded double-layer model is selected. Meanwhile, the PGPRM are insensitive to polarization directions, and the beam can be rotated synchronously by rotating the PGPRM around the z-axis.
The PGPRM unit is designed as a metal square ring. The period of the PGPRM unit should lie between 1/5 and 1/2 λ at the working frequency 9 GHz, and the period of the unit is optimized as p = 15 mm, which is approximately 0.45 λ [32]. The size of the metal square ring is a key factor affecting the unit’s reflection phase. Thus, selecting a larger outer side length of l = 13.5 mm for the metal square ring provides ample room for variation. To avoid extreme cases, a moderate initial inner side length of the metal square ring, s = 8 mm, is selected. The thickness of the metasurface unit is set as 1 mm, approximately 1/33 λ , which demonstrates the thin and lightweight characteristic of the PGPRM. The F4B dielectric plate exhibits excellent electrical performance of low loss and stable dielectric constant, particularly in high-frequency applications. F4B material with a dielectric constant of 2.65 is thus utilized as the PGPRM unit [33,34].
The infinite periodic PGPRM model was simulated in HFSS using the Floquet port. The Floquet port, primarily used for periodic structures, also simplifies boundary conditions with oblique incident wave setup and analysis in non-periodic structures [35]. The model’s reflection characteristic were simulated and analyzed, with the results presented in Figure 3a. The reflection phase of the model decreased with increasing frequency, while the reflection amplitude remained at a high level (>0.6). The center frequency of the PGPRM unit was set at 9 GHz. The influence of the square aperture’s side length s on the reflection characteristic was analyzed, with the results shown in Figure 3b. As the structural parameter s increased, the reflection phase decreased approximately linearly, while the reflection amplitude first increased and then decreased. Thus, the phase gradient between units can be adjusted by varying the parameter s of the PGPRM. Finally, the unit’s polarization characteristic was analyzed. The reflection characteristic and cross-polarization isolation of the model under TE and TM mode states were analyzed separately. The results are presented in Figure 3c,d. The results indicate that the model exhibits polarization insensitivity characteristic and extremely low cross-polarization isolation.
Based on the above analysis, metasurface units 1–9 with a gradient phase of approximately 10° can be achieved. The structural parameters of the units were [s1, s2, s3, s4, s5, s6, s7, s8, s9] = [13 mm, 12 mm, 11 mm, 10 mm, 9 mm, 8 mm, 7 mm, 6 mm, 5 mm], while the remaining structural parameters were the same with [h1, p, l] = [1 mm, 15 mm, 13.5 mm]. As the parameter s decreased, the units’ reflection phase increased linearly while maintaining an average phase difference of approximately 10° between adjacent units. As can be observed from Figure 3b, it is evident that the PGPRM can achieve a reflection phase coverage of approximately 78° at 9 GHz.

3. Gain and Beam Deflection Analysis

3.1. PGPRM Antenna Design

Feeding antennas are critical components in antenna systems. Thus, this paper employs a compact patch antenna with a relatively wide bandwidth [36]. This antenna features dual polarization, allowing the polarization mode to be altered by switching the feeding port. The design of the proposed L-shaped groove patch antenna alongside the PGPRM antenna is illustrated in Figure 4. The structural parameters are detailed in Table 1.
The square substrate of the antenna has a side length of 135 mm. It comprises two feeding lines, three substrates, one radiation patch, and an L-shaped groove ground plane. The radiation patch is positioned between substrate 1 and substrate 2. Two feeding ports are arranged vertically on substrate 3. An L-shaped groove is etched on the ground plane beneath the antenna to enhance coupling between the feeding lines and the radiation patch, thereby improving the impedance bandwidth [37]. Additionally, substrate 1 functions as a dielectric matching layer for the patch, further expanding the antenna’s bandwidth [38]. Thick substrate 2 enhances bandwidth by increasing radiation resistance, while thin substrate 3 minimizes unwanted stray radiation from the feeding line. All three dielectric substrate layers are constructed from F4B material, which has a dielectric constant of 2.2.
When α = 0 ,   φ P G P R M = φ G N D = π , Equation (5) can be simplified as follows:
h = λ 2 + N λ 2 ,
where the loading height h = h 2 + h 3 + h 4 + h 5 = 16.5   m m . It is anticipated that the antenna will achieve high gain and beam deflection effects at 9 GHz.

3.2. PGPRM Antenna Simulation Results

Employing HFSS as the simulation analysis tool, the simulation results of the PGPRM antenna were obtained. The comparison of 3D radiation patterns at 9 GHz is illustrated in Figure 5a,b, while the comparison of 2D radiation patterns is depicted in Figure 5c.
Figure 5 demonstrates that the PGPRM successfully achieved a large angle of beam deflection with significant gain improvement. The single-layer PGPRM achieved a beam deflection of 29°, whereas the double-layer PGPRM achieved a beam deflection of 47°. The maximum gain of the original feed antenna was 6.3 dBi, and the gain was effectively improved to 16.9 dBi after loading the PGPRM. The maximum gain improvement for the single-layer PGPRM antenna was 10.6 dB, while the double-layer PGPRM antenna achieved a maximum gain improvement of 10.1 dB.
Further analysis of the beam deflection bandwidth of the PGPRM antenna is illustrated in the 2D radiation patterns, as depicted in Figure 6. The single-layer PGPRM achieved a beam deflection of 29° within the frequency band of 8.6–9.2 GHz, whereas the cascaded double-layer PGPRM achieved a beam deflection of 47° within the same band.
It is noted that our proposed PGPRM unit has broadband high reflectivity characteristic. Therefore, by adjusting the loading height, its gain enhancement and beam deflection capability were tested at different working frequencies. The gain patterns of single-layer PGPRM antenna at half wavelength loading heights of 10 GHz, 11 GHz, 12 GHz, and 13 GHz are shown in Figure 7. As shown in the figure, when the loading height of PGPRM changes, the working frequency of the antenna will also change accordingly. This confirms our speculation that the broadband high reflectivity characteristic of PGPRM can be utilized to achieve gain enhancement and beam deflection in multiple working frequency.
Although PGPRM has broadband characteristic, its gain enhancement and beam deflection capability will decrease with increasing frequency due to the influence of the working bandwidth of the feed antenna. Therefore, in the future, we will improve the feed antenna to a broadband antenna to further expand the working bandwidth of PGPRM antenna.
Finally, based on the polarization insensitivity of metasurface units, the PGPRM antenna should be able to achieve beam scanning within the xoy plane from 0 to 360° by rotating the PGPRM at 9 GHz. As shown in Figure 8, when the single-layer PGPRM rotates around the z-axis, the main beam follows this rotation, achieving beam scanning from 0 to 360° in the xoy plane. Simultaneously, the main beam consistently maintains a 29° beam deflection relative to the z-axis.
In summary, it can be concluded that cascading layers of PGPRM and adjusting the phase gradient enable significant beam deflection in the xoz plane. And thus, 360° beam scanning within the xoy plane can be accomplished by rotating the metasurface.

4. Discussion

To analyze the working mechanism of the high-gain beam deflection performance after loading the PGPRM, it is essential to examine the electric field distribution of the antenna before and after the PGPRM is loaded. Figure 9 illustrates the electric field distribution of the antenna before and after the PGPRM is loaded.
As illustrated in Figure 9, the PGPRM concentrates and deflects the emitted electric field, achieving high gain and significant beam deflection, which is consistent with prior expectations. At 9 GHz, the electric field of the PGPRM is predominantly distributed along the negative x-axis, corresponding to the direction of wide-angle beam deflection.
To further highlight the intrinsic advantage of the proposed design, a comparison of the overall performance for the proposed beam deflection metasurface with some representative published works is tabulated in Table 2. Reference [13] used modal synthesis to generate tilted beams and achieved high gain and large-angle beam deflection by combining two radiation modes of the metasurface. Reference [14] designed a metasurface with two working states of transmission and reflection, which can, respectively, achieve beam deflection and high gain. References [15,16,17] used a combination of active metasurface and FP cavity to generate tilted beams. By adjusting the working mode of the metasurface, high-gain beam deflection of the beam can be achieved. Reference [18] achieved high-gain beam deflection by combining an FP cavity with a Phase Gradient Partially Reflective Metasurface. Reference [19] designed a multi-beam antenna based on metasurfaces, which achieved beam deflection by loading the metasurface above the feeding network and combining four antenna elements with different orientations to achieve multi-beam functionality. Compared to references [13,14,15,16,17,18,19], this paper has lower system complexity, higher gain effect, and a wide working bandwidth.
Despite its excellent beam deflection performance and high-gain effect, the current PGPRM antenna still has the problem of high overall height during cascading, and the phase gradient of the PGPRM still needs to be improved. At the same time, the proposed PGPRM has broadband characteristic that cannot be demonstrated due to the feed antenna. In the future, we will further optimize the PGPRM antenna to reduce its height and optimize the PGPRM units’ structure to increase its phase gradient. Also, the feed antenna will be improved to a broadband antenna to broaden the working bandwidth of PGPRM antenna.

5. Conclusions

This paper introduces a gradient phase metasurface that effectively realizes high gain and beam deflection capabilities. The single-layer PGPRM can obtain a maximum gain of 16.9 dBi and a main beam deflection of 29° within the 8.6–9.2 GHz band (6.7%). In contrast, the double-layer PGPRM achieved a maximum gain of 16.4 dBi and a main beam deflection of 47° within the same frequency range. The proposed PGPRM has broadband characteristic, and the working frequency of the PGPRM antenna can be changed by adjusting the loading height of the PGPRM. Additionally, it demonstrates polarization insensitivity across a range of 0° to 360°. Compared to prior studies, this work demonstrates substantial gain enhancement and remarkable flexibility in controlling beam direction. These findings offer promising potential for future wireless communication systems and signal improvement in indoor communication.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.F., R.X., J.H., Q.F., L.L. and B.Z.; methodology, H.Q., L.F., R.X., Y.M. and L.L.; software, H.Q., R.X., and B.Z.; validation, H.Q., L.F. and R.X.; formal analysis, H.Q., R.X., Q.F., L.L. and B.Z.; investigation, H.Q., L.F., R.X. and B.Z.; resources, L.L. and B.Z.; data curation, H.Q., Y.L. and B.Z.; writing—original draft, H.Q.; writing—review and editing, H.Q., L.F., R.X., Y.M., J.H. and Y.L.; visualization, R.X., Y.M., J.H., Q.F., Y.L. and L.L.; supervision, L.L. and B.Z.; project administration, L.F. and B.Z.; funding acquisition, R.X., L.L. and B.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2023YFB3811503), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 62071423, No. 62288101), the Top-Notch Young Talent of China, the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. LR23F010004, No. LZ24A050002), the Top-Notch Young Talent of Zhejiang Province, and the Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (No. 2024C01160), the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi (No. 2021TD-07), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 226-2024-00125), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and the Innovation Fund of Xidian University (No. XJSJ24094, No. 20103224952 and No. XJSJ23016).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Navarro-Ortiz, J.; Romero-Diaz, P.; Sendra, S.; Ameigeiras, P.; Ramos-Munoz, J.J.; Lopez-Soler, J.M. A survey on 5G usage scenarios and traffic models. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 22, 905–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ghosh, A.; Thomas, T.A.; Cudak, M.C.; Ratasuk, R.; Moorut, P.; Vook, F.W.; Rappaport, T.S.; MacCartney, G.R.; Sun, S.; Nie, S. Millimeter-wave enhanced local area systems: A high-data-rate approach for future wireless networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2014, 32, 1152–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rappaport, T.S.; Sun, S.; Mayzus, R.; Zhao, H.; Azar, Y.; Wang, K.; Wong, G.N.; Schulz, J.K.; Samimi, M.; Gutierrez, F. Millimeter wave mobile communications for 5g cellular: It will work! IEEE Access 2013, 1, 335–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Boccardi, F.; Heath, R.W.; Lozano, A.; Marzetta, T.L.; Popovski, P. Five Disruptive Technology Directions for 5G. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2014, 52, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bai, T.; Alkhateeb, A.; Heath, R.W. Coverage and capacity of millimeter-wave cellular networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2015, 52, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bai, T.; Heath, R.W. Coverage and rate analysis for millimeter-wave cellular networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2015, 14, 1100–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alotaibi, A.A. Enhancing Indoor Wireless Coverage Through Providing a New Deployment Plan for Picocell Devices. In Proceedings of the 2021 National Computing Colleges Conference (NCCC), Taif, Saudi Arabia, 27–28 March 2021; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Z.; Hu, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J. Enhancing Indoor mmWave Wireless Coverage: Small-Cell Densification or Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces Deployment? IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2021, 10, 2547–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Esmail, B.A.F.; Koziel, S.; Golunski, L.; Majid, H.B.A.; Barik, R.K. Overview of Metamaterials-Integrated Antennas for Beam Manipulation Applications: The Two Decades of Progress. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 67096–67116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dadgarpour, A.; Zarghooni, B.; Virdee, B.S.; Denidni, T.A. Beam-Deflection Using Gradient Refractive-Index Media for 60-GHz End-Fire Antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2015, 63, 3768–3774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dadgarpour, A.; Kishk, A.A.; Denidni, T.A. Dual Band High-Gain Antenna with Beam Switching Capability. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 2017, 11, 2155–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, J.; Zeng, Q.; Liu, R.; Denidni, T.A. Beam-Tilting Antenna with Negative Refractive Index Metamaterial Loading. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2017, 16, 2030–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, B.; Yang, D.; Pan, J.; Chen, Y.; Liu, S. A Low-Profile Metasurface-Inspired Antenna with Tilted Beam Radiation. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2023, 22, 1803–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tian, S.; Han, M.; Xu, J.; Liu, H. Multifunctional coding metasurface for focusing and beam deflection based on polarization selection. Electromagnetics 2024, 44, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Naqvi, A.H.; Lim, S. Low-Profile Electronic Beam-Scanning Metasurface Antenna for Ka-Band Applications. Waves Random Complex Media 2023, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ji, L.-Y.; Zhang, Z.-Y.; Liu, N.-W. A Two-Dimensional Beam-Steering Partially Reflective Surface (PRS) Antenna Using a Reconfigurable FSS Structure. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2019, 18, 1076–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, J.; Jiang, W.; Gong, S. Low-RCS Beam-Steering Antenna Based on Reconfigurable Phase Gradient Metasurface. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2019, 18, 2016–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ni, C.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z. A Wideband Circularly Polarized and Beam Deflection Antenna Based on Two Metasurfaces. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2023, 22, 2861–2865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, J.; Han, L.; Chen, X.; Yang, R.; Zhang, W. Multi-Beam Patch Antenna Based on Metasurface. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 37281–37286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yue, H.; Chen, L.; Yang, Y.; He, L.; Shi, X. Design and Implementation of a Dual Frequency and Bidirectional Phase Gradient Metasurface for Beam Convergence. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2019, 18, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liang, J.-J.; Huang, G.-L.; Zhao, J.-N.; Gao, Z.-J.; Yuan, T. Wideband Phase-Gradient Metasurface Antenna with Focused Beams. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 20767–20772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shen, Z.; Du, M. High-performance refractive index sensing system based on multiple Fano resonances in polarization-insensitive metasurface with nanorings. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 28287–28296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Badri, S.H.; Gilarlue, M.M.; SaeidNahaei, S.; Kim, J.S. Narrowband-to-broadband switchable and polarization-insensitive terahertz metasurface absorber enabled by phase-change material. J. Opt. 2022, 24, 025101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lv, Y.-H.; Ding, X.; Wang, B.-Z. Dual-Wideband High-Gain Fabry-Perot Cavity Antenna. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 4754–4760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Orr, R.; Goussetis, G.; Fusco, V. Design Method for Circularly Polarized Fabry–Perot Cavity Antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2014, 62, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, J.-G. Compact and robust Fabry-Perot cavity antenna with PEC wall. J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci. 2021, 21, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Trentini, G. Partially reflecting sheet arrays. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 1956, 4, 666–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, N.; Genevet, P.; Kats, M.A.; Aieta, F.; Tetienne, J.-P.; Capasso, F.; Gaburro, Z. Light Propagation with Phase Discontinuities: Generalized Laws of Reflection and Refraction. Science 2011, 334, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Akbari, M.; Farahani, M.; Ghayekhloo, A.; Zarbakhsh, S.; Sebak, A.-R.; Denidni, T.A. Beam tilting approaches based on phase gradient surface for mmWave antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2020, 68, 4372–4385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, K.; Xu, J.; Pang, H. Modulation of Antenna Beam in Both Elevation and Azimuth Planes by Reflective Phase Gradient Metasurface. Electromagnetics 2023, 43, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou, G.-N.; Sun, B.-H.; Liang, Q.-Y.; Yang, Y.-H.; Lan, J.-H. Beam-Deflection Short Backfire Antenna Using Phase-Modulated Metasurface. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2020, 68, 546–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Amer, A.A.G.; Sapuan, S.Z.; Nasimuddin, N.; Alphones, A.; Zinal, N.B. A Comprehensive Review of Metasurface Structures Suitable for RF Energy Harvesting. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 76433–76452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bi, K.; Wang, Q.; Xu, J.; Chen, L.; Lan, C.; Lei, M. All-Dielectric Metamaterial Fabrication Techniques. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2001474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ma, H.F.; Cui, T.J. Three-dimensional broadband ground-plane cloak made of metamaterials. Nat. Commun. 2010, 1, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Numan, A.B.; Sharawi, M.S. Extraction of Material Parameters for Metamaterials Using a Full-Wave Simulator [Education Column]. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2013, 55, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, Y.; Chen, S.; Ren, Y.; Cheng, J.; Liu, Q.H. A Broadband Proximity-Coupled Dual-Polarized Microstrip Antenna with L-Shape Backed Cavity for X-Band Applications. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2015, 69, 1226–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sun, D.; You, L. A broadband impedance matching method for proximity-coupled microstrip antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2010, 58, 1392–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sun, D.; Dou, W.; You, L. Application of novel cavity-backed proximity-coupled microstrip patch antenna to design broadband conformal phased array. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2010, 9, 1010–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the proposed PGPRM based on FPC theory.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the proposed PGPRM based on FPC theory.
Materials 17 05688 g001
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of multiple reflections and deflection of electromagnetic waves.
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of multiple reflections and deflection of electromagnetic waves.
Materials 17 05688 g002
Figure 3. Infinite periodic model simulation of PGPRM. (a) Reflection phase and amplitude varying with frequency; (b) reflection phase and amplitude varying with the side length of the square aperture at 9 GHz; (c) polarization sensitivity analysis; (d) cross isolation analysis.
Figure 3. Infinite periodic model simulation of PGPRM. (a) Reflection phase and amplitude varying with frequency; (b) reflection phase and amplitude varying with the side length of the square aperture at 9 GHz; (c) polarization sensitivity analysis; (d) cross isolation analysis.
Materials 17 05688 g003
Figure 4. Overall schematic diagram of PGPRM antenna. (a) Schematic diagram of L-shaped groove patch antenna; (b) schematic diagram of each layer of L-shaped groove patch antenna; (c) top view of PGPRM antenna; (d) side view of single-layer and double-layer PGPRM antenna.
Figure 4. Overall schematic diagram of PGPRM antenna. (a) Schematic diagram of L-shaped groove patch antenna; (b) schematic diagram of each layer of L-shaped groove patch antenna; (c) top view of PGPRM antenna; (d) side view of single-layer and double-layer PGPRM antenna.
Materials 17 05688 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of simulation results between single-layer PGPRM antenna and double-layer PGPRM antenna. (a) Three-dimensional directional pattern of double-layer PGPRM antenna; (b) three-dimensional directional pattern of single-layer PGPRM antenna; (c) comparison of E-plane directional diagrams.
Figure 5. Comparison of simulation results between single-layer PGPRM antenna and double-layer PGPRM antenna. (a) Three-dimensional directional pattern of double-layer PGPRM antenna; (b) three-dimensional directional pattern of single-layer PGPRM antenna; (c) comparison of E-plane directional diagrams.
Materials 17 05688 g005
Figure 6. Comparison of directional patterns of PGPRM antenna in the 8.6–9.2 GHz frequency band. (a) At 8.6, 8.7 GHz. (b) At 8.8, 8.9 GHz. (c) At 9.0, 9.1 GHz. (d) At 9.2 GHz.
Figure 6. Comparison of directional patterns of PGPRM antenna in the 8.6–9.2 GHz frequency band. (a) At 8.6, 8.7 GHz. (b) At 8.8, 8.9 GHz. (c) At 9.0, 9.1 GHz. (d) At 9.2 GHz.
Materials 17 05688 g006aMaterials 17 05688 g006b
Figure 7. The directional patterns of single-layer PGPRM antenna at different loading heights. (a) At 15 mm, half wavelength of 10 GHz. (b) At 13.6 mm, half wavelength of 11 GHz. (c) At 12.5 mm, half wavelength of 12 GHz. (d) At 11.5 mm, half wavelength of 13 GHz.
Figure 7. The directional patterns of single-layer PGPRM antenna at different loading heights. (a) At 15 mm, half wavelength of 10 GHz. (b) At 13.6 mm, half wavelength of 11 GHz. (c) At 12.5 mm, half wavelength of 12 GHz. (d) At 11.5 mm, half wavelength of 13 GHz.
Materials 17 05688 g007aMaterials 17 05688 g007b
Figure 8. Comparison of beam directions after rotating the single-layer PGPRM around z-axis. (a) 0°; (b) 90°; (c) 180°; (d) 270°.
Figure 8. Comparison of beam directions after rotating the single-layer PGPRM around z-axis. (a) 0°; (b) 90°; (c) 180°; (d) 270°.
Materials 17 05688 g008
Figure 9. Electric field distribution before and after loading PGPRM. (a) Before loading PGPRM at 9 GHz; (b) after loading single-layer PGPRM at 9 GHz; (c) after loading double-layer PGPRM at 9 GHz; (d) surface electric field distribution of single-layer PGPRM antenna at 9 GHz; (e) surface electric field distribution of upper layer PGPRM in double-layer PGPRM antenna at 9 GHz.
Figure 9. Electric field distribution before and after loading PGPRM. (a) Before loading PGPRM at 9 GHz; (b) after loading single-layer PGPRM at 9 GHz; (c) after loading double-layer PGPRM at 9 GHz; (d) surface electric field distribution of single-layer PGPRM antenna at 9 GHz; (e) surface electric field distribution of upper layer PGPRM in double-layer PGPRM antenna at 9 GHz.
Materials 17 05688 g009
Table 1. Structural parameters of PGPRM antenna, unit: mm.
Table 1. Structural parameters of PGPRM antenna, unit: mm.
SymbolValue (mm)SymbolValue (mm)SymbolValue (mm)
s113h11lc12.5
s212h211.5wc4.3
s311h31.5lp6
s410h43wp6
s59h50.5dx168.5
s68h63dx263
s77h71dy165.3
s86h88dy263
s95wf1.5lf15.5
Table 2. Comparison with previous research.
Table 2. Comparison with previous research.
Ref.Maximum
Gain
Beam
Deflection
Bandwidth
Maximum
Beam
Deflection
[13]7.9 dBi5.1 GHz35°
[14]7.5 dBi
22.5 dBi
13.4 GHz
17.9 GHz
34°
[15]10.7 dBi28 GHz10°
[16]10.5 dBi5.44~5.66 GHz22°
[17]4.5 dBi4.2~4.55 GHz23°
[18]12.3 dBi9.7~10.7 GHz58°
[19]9.1 dBi5.58~5.93 GHz32°
This workSingle-layer 16.9 dBi
Double-layer 16.4 dBi
8.6~9.2 GHz
8.6~9.2 GHz
29°
47°
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiu, H.; Fang, L.; Xi, R.; Mu, Y.; Han, J.; Feng, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, L.; Zheng, B. Polarization-Insensitive Metasurface with High-Gain Large-Angle Beam Deflection. Materials 2024, 17, 5688. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17235688

AMA Style

Qiu H, Fang L, Xi R, Mu Y, Han J, Feng Q, Li Y, Li L, Zheng B. Polarization-Insensitive Metasurface with High-Gain Large-Angle Beam Deflection. Materials. 2024; 17(23):5688. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17235688

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiu, Huanran, Liang Fang, Rui Xi, Yajie Mu, Jiaqi Han, Qiang Feng, Ying Li, Long Li, and Bin Zheng. 2024. "Polarization-Insensitive Metasurface with High-Gain Large-Angle Beam Deflection" Materials 17, no. 23: 5688. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17235688

APA Style

Qiu, H., Fang, L., Xi, R., Mu, Y., Han, J., Feng, Q., Li, Y., Li, L., & Zheng, B. (2024). Polarization-Insensitive Metasurface with High-Gain Large-Angle Beam Deflection. Materials, 17(23), 5688. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17235688

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop