Next Article in Journal
Fuzzy Logic Approach for Modeling of Heating and Scale Formation in Industrial Furnaces
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Waste PET Fiber on the Mechanical Properties and Chloride Ion Penetration of Emergency Repair Concrete for Road Pavement
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Variation of Corrosion Characteristics and Tensile Performances of WE43 Alloy Under Marine Atmospheric Environment

Southwest Technology and Engineering Research Institute, Chongqing 400039, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(21), 5353; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17215353
Submission received: 11 October 2024 / Revised: 26 October 2024 / Accepted: 30 October 2024 / Published: 1 November 2024

Abstract

:
This study aims to examine the variation in corrosion characteristics and tensile properties of WE43 magnesium alloy in an actual marine atmospheric environment by means of outdoor exposure tests. The macroscopic corrosion morphology, microstructure, and tensile properties were analyzed. The results indicated that WE43 alloy will corrode rapidly during exposure under marine atmospheric environmental conditions, resulting in a loose and porous Mg(OH)2 layer on the surface. The Mg matrix was mainly consumed as an anode, leading to the occurrence of corrosion pits. With the increase in exposure time, both the tensile strength and plasticity of WE43 alloy gradually deteriorated. After exposure for six months, the elongation and area reduction were significantly reduced, with a reduction ratio of more than 50%. After 18 months of exposure, the ultimate strength of the alloy decreased from 359 MPa to 300 MPa. According to an analysis of fractures in the alloy, the corrosion pits on the sample surface were the main reason for the decrease in tensile properties.

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of the aerospace industry, the weight reduction of structural components has become a huge challenge [1]. Magnesium and its alloys have been considered popular engineering structural materials in aerospace, transportation, and electronic technologies because of their high strength, low density, and thermal conductivity [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Thus, many researchers have focused on the effects of heat treatment, deformation parameters, and various chemical elements on the microstructure and mechanical properties of magnesium alloys [10,11,12]. However, Mg alloys possess poor corrosion resistance [13,14]. Therefore, when Mg alloy components operate in corrosive media, especially in marine environments, they will undergo corrosion leading to the degradation of mechanical properties.
Up to now, many studies have explored the corrosion behavior of magnesium alloys [15,16,17,18]. For instance, Li et al. studied the corrosion behavior of WE43 and AZ80 alloys in NaCl and Na2SO4 solutions, and found that when immersed in Na2SO4 solution, WE43 alloy shows a unique micro-galvanic corrosion behavior [15]. Liu et al. observed the corrosion performance of extruded and forged Mg-Gd-Y-Nd-Zr alloys in 0.6 M NaCl solution, indicating that the extruded alloy showed uniform corrosion, while the forged alloy suffered severe local galvanic corrosion [16]. However, most studies have been carried out in simulated corrosive environments, which cannot reflect the actual corrosion behavior of Mg alloys in the natural environment. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the variation in microstructure and tensile properties of WE43 magnesium alloy in an actual marine atmosphere environment via outdoor exposure tests. After outdoor exposure for different lengths of time, the macromorphology, cross-sectional morphology, microstructure, and tensile properties of WE43 alloy were analyzed.

2. Experimental

Rolled WE43 that had undergone T5 heat treatment was used in this study. Its chemical composition is shown in Table 1, and the initial microstructure is shown in Figure 1. As observed, the present alloy consists of α-Mg matrix and precipitates, of which the grains are typically fine. Meanwhile, the α-Mg matrix is equiaxed, and precipitates are mainly distributed in the matrix, while a minority of the precipitates are located at the grain boundaries. Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of WE43 alloy. It is obvious that the phases of WE43 alloy comprise an α-Mg matrix and a β(Mg14Nd2Y) phase. Therefore, it can be concluded that the precipitates in WE43 alloy were β(Mg14Nd2Y).
Plate-shaped samples of 100 mm × 50 mm × 3 mm and dumbbell-shaped samples with a dimension of 10 mm in diameter were cut from a WE43 rolled plate and placed in an outdoor exposure field (300 m from the coastline) in Wanning, Hainan Province. The test field possessed a typical hot and humid marine atmospheric environment. All samples were firmly installed on the exposure test rack and inclined at a 45° angle from the horizontal surface. After exposure intervals of 6, 12, and 18 months, one piece of plate sample and three pieces of dumbbell-shaped samples were picked for organizational observation and mechanical performance testing, respectively. The microstructures were observed by optical microscopy (OM, Leica DFC320, Wetzlar, Germany) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Jeol JSM-6390A, Tokyo, Japan). The second phase composition was analyzed using the D/MAX 2200 PC X-ray diffraction (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) instrument and a transmitted electron microscope (TEM, TECNAI F30 G2, Hillsboro, OR, USA). An MTS E45.105 servo-hydraulic tensile machine was used to test the tensile performance at room temperature and tensile speed of 2 mm/min. The average value of three test results is shown in this study. The weight loss was analyzed according to the Chinese Standard 16545-2015 [19] (Corrosion of metals and alloys—Removal of corrosion products from corrosion test specimens).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Macroscopic Corrosion Morphology

Figure 3 shows the macroscopic morphology of WE43 alloy after different lengths of exposure time in a hot and humid marine atmospheric environment. It is obvious that the WE43 alloy corroded quickly, as its surface turned dark gray after one month of outdoor exposure, as shown in Figure 3a. As the exposure time increased to six months, the sample surface changed from dark gray to gray and white, as shown in Figure 3b. When the exposure time increased to 12 months, the sample surface changed to dark gray again, as shown in Figure 3c. After further extending the exposure time, the color of the sample surface changed again, as shown in Figure 3d. That is, as the exposure time is extended, the sample surface shows a phenomenon of alternating dark gray and gray and white color change. Table 2 shows the weight loss data of the WE43 alloy after exposure times of different length in a hot and humid marine atmospheric environment. The analysis of the average weight loss showed that the values after exposure for 6 months, 12 months and 18 months were 0.2544 g, 0.4283 g, and 0.6177 g, respectively. Correspondingly, the corrosion rate of the present alloy was 0.128 g/(m2 d), 0.1075 g/(m2 d), and 0.1032 g/(m2 d), respectively. This indicates that the specimens’ weight loss increases with the increase in exposure time. Compared with aluminum alloys [20,21], WE43 alloy corroded more quickly.
XRD was used to analyze the surfaces of the samples after outdoor exposure under hot and humid marine atmospheric environmental conditions, as shown in Figure 4a. As indicated, the main corrosion products on the sample surface are Mg(OH)2 and MgCl2. It has been demonstrated that Mg alloys are extremely prone to corrosion in humid environments [22,23]. According to literature [24], Mg matrix is relatively active with a standard electrode potential of −2.37 V, which is often consumed as an anode, and producing Mg(OH)2 on the sample surface. The reaction formula is as follows [25].
Mg − 2e → Mg2+ (anodic reaction)
2H2O + 2e → 2OH + H2↑ (cathodic reaction)
Mg + 2H2O → Mg(OH)2↓ + H2↑ (overall reaction)
Further analysis of the corrosion product via EDS is shown in Figure 4b. The main elements contained are Mg and O, of which the atomic percentage is about 2:1, further verifying that the corrosion products are Mg(OH)2. Since the reaction produces gas, it will destroy the deposited Mg(OH)2 surface film during the release of gas and form a loose porous structure, as shown in Figure 4b. Thus, the corrosion products have a weak protective effect on the matrix. According to previous research, the Cl deposition rate at the Wanning test site can reach about 14.5875 mg/(m2 d) [26,27]. Therefore, as the corrosion progresses, Cl ions in the hot and humid marine atmospheric environment easily enter the interior of the Mg alloy through the loose structure and react with the Mg matrix to generate MgCl2.

3.2. Micro-Corrosion Characteristics

Figure 5 shows the cross-sectional morphology of WE43 alloy after outdoor exposure for different lengths of time. As indicated, the corrosion characteristics of the alloy are always pitting corrosion, corrosion pits that appear jagged, and corrosion pits that tend to be connected to one another as the corrosion progresses, as shown in Figure 5a. Moreover, the exfoliated matrix can be found by analyzing the corrosion pits and the matrix, as shown in Figure 5c. As observed, after pitting occurs, many small corrosion pits appear at the edges of large corrosion pits, and these mainly exist in the Mg matrix. The small corrosion pits show a tendency to expand into the surrounding matrix, as shown in the magnified image of the red rectangle in Figure 5c. Accordingly, it can be speculated that the surfaces of the samples are in contact with humid air, thereby forming galvanic corrosion conditions and causing Mg matrix corrosion, forming corrosion pits. Since the formed Mg(OH)2 corrosion products have a loose porous structure and cannot protect the Mg matrix from the corrosive environment, the corrosion behavior will continue. As a result, the junction between the corrosion pits and the Mg matrix becomes a new location for corrosion, and newly formed small corrosion pits expand around the Mg matrix. After expanding to a certain extent, the adjacent corrosion pits connect to one another, causing the Mg matrix to peel off. Therefore, the macroscopic morphologies of the samples exhibit alternating dark gray and gray-white phenomena with increasing length of exposure time.
Figure 6 shows the TEM images of WE43 alloy. As shown in Figure 6a, there is a second phase within the Mg matrix and grain boundaries. By diffraction spot analysis of the second phase, the second phase was found to be β(Mg14Nd2Y) phase, which further verified the XRD results. High-resolution analysis results show that the second phase has a face-centered cubic structure, a = b = c = 2.23 nm, and the Mg matrix has a hexagonal close-packed structure, a = b = 0.32 nm, and c = 0.52 nm. Meanwhile, the β phase and Mg matrix maintain an incoherent relationship, but there is a certain orientation relationship: [-110]Mg14Nd2Y∥[4-51-6]Mg. Typically, the precipitation of the intergranular second phase can easily lead to intergranular corrosion. However, for WE43 alloy, due to the incoherent relationship between the second phase and the Mg matrix, the distortion energy of the phase interface is low, and stress concentration will not be formed or is weak, so WE43 has no intergranular corrosion. Therefore, under the galvanic corrosion conditions formed by the active Mg matrix and the second phase, the corrosion type present in the WE43 alloy is mainly pitting corrosion, and the Mg matrix is continuously consumed.
Figure 7 shows the EBSD maps of WE43 after 18 months of outdoor exposure. According to the IPF results, the Mg matrix is a typical recrystallized equiaxed microstructure with fine and uniform grains. Figure 7b illustrates dislocations and lattice distortion near corrosion pits. As demonstrated, the contact position between the corrosion pits and the Mg matrix appears blue, indicating there is no significant dislocation accumulation and stress concentration, and there is no significant stress concentration inside the matrix. This is consistent with TEM images, further demonstrating that the main type of corrosion in WE43 alloy is pitting corrosion, and intergranular corrosion will not occur. Additionally, corrosion pits expand randomly around the Mg matrix during corrosion, because there is no obvious stress concentration inside the WE43 alloy.
Figure 8 shows the cross section of the corrosion products. It can be found that corrosion behavior occurs near the white second phase under the hot and humid marine atmospheric environmental conditions. Meanwhile, in the corrosion products layer, the second phase remains. This proves that during the corrosion process, the second phase serves as the cathode and the Mg matrix serves as the anode and is continuously consumed.

3.3. The Degradation of Mechanical Property

Figure 9 shows the variation in tensile performances of WE43 alloy after outdoor exposure times of different length under hot and humid marine atmospheric environmental conditions. It is obvious that the strength and plasticity of WE43 alloy have undergone significant changes. As shown in Figure 9a, as the exposure time increases, the tensile strength and yield strength continue to decrease. After an 18-month exposure, the ultimate strength of WE43 decreased from 359 MPa to 300 MPa. As shown in Figure 9b, after a 6-month exposure, the elongation and area reduction of WE43 alloy decreased by more than 50%. According to the results of these corrosion characteristics, the alloy would corrode quickly in a humid environment, forming jagged corrosion pits on the sample surface. When stretching, the tips of corrosion pits face the inside of the sample and are perpendicular to the direction of stress, which can easily become the location for crack initiation, resulting in a decrease in the performance of WE43. However, after 6 months of exposure, if the exposure time continues to be extended, the elongation and area reduction of WE43 alloy do not continue to show a decreasing trend, indicating that the impact of corrosion behavior on the plasticity of WE43 is mainly concentrated in the early stage of corrosion.
Figure 10 shows the fracture morphology of WE43 alloy after outdoor exposure under hot and humid marine atmospheric environmental conditions. As indicated, the fracture includes two morphologies: One is the dimple-free fracture near the corrosion pits, and the second is the conventional fracture morphology outside the corrosion pits. The above phenomena show that during the stretching process, corrosion pits become the location of crack initiation and the weak points involved in WE43 cracking, while locations other than corrosion pits maintain the original fracture mode and form a large number of dimples, which also explains why the plasticity of WE43 does not decrease with exposure time.

4. Conclusions

The corrosion characteristics and mechanical property changes of WE43 in a hot and humid marine atmospheric environment were investigated. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1)
In a hot and humid marine atmospheric environment, WE43 alloy corroded rapidly, forming a loose and porous Mg(OH)2 layer on the surface, which had a weak protective effect on the matrix. Thus, as the corrosion progressed, in a hot and humid marine atmospheric environment Cl ions easily entered the Mg alloy through the loose structure and reacted with the Mg matrix to generate MgCl2. As a result, the weight loss of WE43 alloy increased gradually.
(2)
The main corrosion mechanism seen in WE43 alloy was pitting corrosion, which formed jagged corrosion pits. As the corrosion progressed, the Mg matrix was continuously consumed as an anode, and the corrosion pits expanded into the surroundings. After expanding to a certain extent, adjacent corrosion pits were connected to each other, resulting in the Mg matrix peeling off.
(3)
The formation of corrosion pits promoted the initiation of cracks, which influenced the tensile properties of the alloy significantly. After only 6 months of exposure, the elongation and area reduction of WE43 alloy were significantly reduced, with a reduction ratio of more than 50%. And after an 18-month exposure, the ultimate strength decreased from 359 MPa to 300 MPa.
(4)
According to the results of this study, we think that some protective methods should be employed to prolong the service properties of WE43 alloy components when they are used under marine atmospheric environmental conditions.

Author Contributions

Methodology, X.W. and J.T.; Formal analysis, L.X., F.L., W.L. and X.R.; Investigation, F.L., F.Z., X.R. and H.W.; Data curation, F.Z. and W.L.; Writing—original draft, L.X.; Writing—review & editing, J.T.; Supervision, M.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. James, C.; Williams, E.A.; Starke, J. Progress in structural materials for aerospace systems. Acta Mater. 2003, 51, 5775–5799. [Google Scholar]
  2. Song, J.; She, J.; Chen, D.; Pan, F. Latest research advances on magnesium and magnesium alloys worldwide. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2020, 8, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ali, M.; Hussein, M.A.; Al-Aqeeli, N. Magnesium-based composites and alloys for medical applications: A review of mechanical and corrosion properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 792, 1162–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hu, Y.J.; Zhou, Q.; Zhai, W.; Wang, J.Y.; Wei, B. Improved mechanical performances of dynamically solidifed Mg97.7Y1.4Al0.9 alloy by three dimensional ultrasounds. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2022, 860, 144153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hao, H.; Li, Q.A.; Chen, X.Y.; Chen, P.J.; Li, X.Y.; Tan, J.F. Hot deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of Mg-Gd-Y(-Sm)-Zr alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 920, 165937. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, X.; Wang, H.; Zou, Q.; Le, Q.; Wen, C.; Atrens, A. The influence of heat treatment on discharge and electrochemical properties of Mg-Gd-Zn magnesium anode with long-period stacking ordered structure for Mg-air battery. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 367, 137518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Feng, B.; Liu, G.; Yang, P.; Huang, S.; Qi, D.; Chen, P.; Wang, C.; Du, J.; Zhang, S.; Liu, J. Different role of the second phase in the micro-galvanic corrosion of WE43 Mg alloy in NaCl and Na2SO4 solution. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2022, 6, 1598–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, S.X.; Wang, S.R.; Wang, G.Q.; Yu, X.C.; Liu, W.T.; Chang, Z.Q.; Wen, D.S. Microstructure, mechanical and corrosion properties of magnesium alloy bone plate treated by high-energy shot peening. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China Engl. Ed. 2019, 29, 1641–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Y.Q.; Li, F.; Kang, F.W.; Du, H.Q.; Chen, Z.Y. Recent research and advances in extrusion forming of magnesium alloys: A review. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 953, 170080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Song, Y.W.; Yuan, K.Z.; Li, X.; Qiao, Y. Microstructure and properties of biomedical Mg-Zn-Ca alloy at different extrusion temperatures. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 35, 105578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, L.H.; Qi, F.G.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Lu, L.W.; Yang, X.P. Corrosion, mechanical and biological properties of biodegradable WE43 alloy modifed by Al ion implantation. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 5327–5334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mardina, Z.; Venezuela, J.; Sjafrizal, T.; Shi, Z.M.; Dargusch, M.S.; Atrens, A. The influence of strain rate and annealing heat treatments on the corrosion and mechanical properties of WE43 and Zn7Ag biodegradable wires for application in soft tissue reconstructions. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 35, 105809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Esmaily, M.; Svensson, J.E.; Fajardo, S.; Birbilis, N.; Frankel, G.S.; Virtanen, S.; Arrabal, R.; Thomas, S.; Johansson, L.G. Fundamentals and advances in magnesium alloy corrosion. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2017, 89, 92–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ammarullah, M.I.; Afif, I.Y.; Maula, M.I.; Winarni, T.I.; Tauviqirrahman, M.; Akbar, I.; Basri, H.; Heide, E.; Jamari, J. Tresca Stress Simulation of Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty during Normal Walking Activity. Materials 2021, 14, 7554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, C.X.; Zhao, Y.M.; Liu, J.H.; Xu, J.L.; Guo, D.; Zhang, H.H.; Zhou, X.H.; Yang, P.X.; Zhang, S.J. Comparison of Corrosion Behavior of WE43 and AZ80 Alloys inNaCl and Na2SO4 Solutions. Crystals 2023, 13, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, G.N.; Xu, J.L.; Feng, B.J.; Liu, J.H.; Qi, D.Q.; Huang, W.Z.; Yang, P.X.; Zhang, S.J. Comparison of Corrosion Performance of Extruded and Forged WE43 Mg Alloy. Materials 2022, 15, 1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Srinivasan, A.; Blawert, C.; Huang, Y.; Mendis, C.L.; Kainer, K.U.; Hort, N. Corrosion behavior of Mg-Gd-Zn based alloys in aqueous NaCl solution. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2014, 2, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zeng, R.C.; Sun, L.; Zheng, Y.F.; Cui, H.Z.; Han, E.H. Corrosion and characterisation of dual-phase Mg-Li-Ca alloy in Hank’s solution: The influence of microstructural features. Corros. Sci. 2014, 79, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. GB/T 16545-2015; Corrosion of Metals and Alloys—Removal of Corrosion Products from Corrosion Test Specimens. SAC: BeiJing, China, 2015.
  20. Tao, J.Q.; Xiang, L.; Zhang, Y.P.; Zhao, Z.D.; Su, Y.; Chen, Q.; Sun, J.P.; Huang, B.; Peng, F.F. Corrosion Behavior and Mechanical Performance of 7085 Aluminum Alloy in a Humid and Hot Marine Atmosphere. Materials 2022, 15, 7503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xiang, L.; Tao, J.Q.; Xia, X.S.; Zhao, Z.D.; Chen, Q.; Su, Y.; Chai, S.X.; Zheng, Z.Y.; Sun, J.P. Impact of Marine Atmospheric Corrosion on the Microstructure and Tensile Properties of 7075 High-Strength Aluminum Alloy. Materials 2023, 16, 2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, J.; Dong, J.H.; Wang, J.Q.; Hou, E. Effect of magnesium hydride on the corrosion behavior of an AZ91 magnesium alloy in sodium chloride solution. Corros. Sci. 2008, 50, 3610–3614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gore, P.; Cain, T.W.; Laird, J.; Scully, J.R.; Birbilis, N.; Raja, V.S. Enrichment efficiency of noble alloying elements on magnesium and effect on hydrogen evolution. Corros. Sci. 2019, 151, 206–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Muldoon, J.; Bucur, C.B.; Gregory, T. Fervent Hype behind Magnesium Batteries: An Open Call to Synthetic Chemists-Electrolytes and Cathodes Needed. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2017, 56, 12064–12084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wu, T.; Zhang, K.M. Corrosion and Protection of Magnesium Alloys: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. Coatings 2023, 13, 1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, S.; Zhang, T.; He, Y.T.; Du, X.; Ma, B.L.; Zhang, T.Y. Long-term atmospheric pre-corrosion fatigue properties of epoxy primer-coated 7075-T6 aluminum alloy structures. Int. J. Fatigue 2019, 129, 105225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shi, L.X.; Xiang, L.; Tao, J.Q.; Chen, Q.; Liu, J.; Zhong, Y. Actual Marine Atmospheric Pre-Corrosion Fatigue Performance of 7075-T73 Aluminum Alloy. Metals 2022, 12, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Initial microstructure of WE43 alloy under (a) low magnification and (b) high magnification.
Figure 1. Initial microstructure of WE43 alloy under (a) low magnification and (b) high magnification.
Materials 17 05353 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of WE43 alloy.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of WE43 alloy.
Materials 17 05353 g002
Figure 3. Macroscopic morphology of WE43 alloy exposed for different lengths of time: (a) 1 month, (b) 6 months, (c) 12 months, (d) 18 months.
Figure 3. Macroscopic morphology of WE43 alloy exposed for different lengths of time: (a) 1 month, (b) 6 months, (c) 12 months, (d) 18 months.
Materials 17 05353 g003
Figure 4. (a) XRD patterns and (b) the morphology of corrosion product on surface of WE43 alloy after outdoor exposure.
Figure 4. (a) XRD patterns and (b) the morphology of corrosion product on surface of WE43 alloy after outdoor exposure.
Materials 17 05353 g004
Figure 5. Cross-sectional morphology of WE43 alloy after different lengths of outdoor exposure time: (a) 6 month, (b) 12 months, (c) 18 months.
Figure 5. Cross-sectional morphology of WE43 alloy after different lengths of outdoor exposure time: (a) 6 month, (b) 12 months, (c) 18 months.
Materials 17 05353 g005
Figure 6. TEM images of WE43: (a) bright-field image, (b) diffraction spots of the secondary phase, (c) morphology of the secondary phase, (d) high-resolution images of the secondary phases.
Figure 6. TEM images of WE43: (a) bright-field image, (b) diffraction spots of the secondary phase, (c) morphology of the secondary phase, (d) high-resolution images of the secondary phases.
Materials 17 05353 g006
Figure 7. EBSD maps of WE43 alloy after 18 months of outdoor exposure in Wanning: (a) IPF map, (b) KAM map.
Figure 7. EBSD maps of WE43 alloy after 18 months of outdoor exposure in Wanning: (a) IPF map, (b) KAM map.
Materials 17 05353 g007
Figure 8. Cross-sectional morphology of the corrosion products.
Figure 8. Cross-sectional morphology of the corrosion products.
Materials 17 05353 g008
Figure 9. Variation in tensile performance of WE43 alloy after different lengths of outdoor exposure time: (a) Strength, (b) plasticity.
Figure 9. Variation in tensile performance of WE43 alloy after different lengths of outdoor exposure time: (a) Strength, (b) plasticity.
Materials 17 05353 g009
Figure 10. Fracture morphology of WE43 alloy after outdoor exposure under hot and humid marine atmospheric environment conditions: (a) 6 months, (b) 12 months.
Figure 10. Fracture morphology of WE43 alloy after outdoor exposure under hot and humid marine atmospheric environment conditions: (a) 6 months, (b) 12 months.
Materials 17 05353 g010
Table 1. Chemical compositions of treated WE43 (wt.%).
Table 1. Chemical compositions of treated WE43 (wt.%).
ElementNdGdYZrZnLiFe
Content/%2.010.743.960.50<0.01<0.01<0.01
Table 2. The weight loss data of WE43 alloy after different lengths of exposure time.
Table 2. The weight loss data of WE43 alloy after different lengths of exposure time.
Samples No.Exposure TimeWeight Loss/gAverage of Weight Loss/gAverage of Corrosion Rate/(g/(m2 d))
16 months0.31460.25440.128
20.2557
30.1929
412 months0.42940.42830.1075
50.4173
60.4384
718 months0.61950.61770.1032
80.5985
90.6350
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiang, L.; Li, F.; Wu, X.; Zhang, F.; Tao, J.; Wang, M.; Lei, W.; Ran, X.; Wang, H. Variation of Corrosion Characteristics and Tensile Performances of WE43 Alloy Under Marine Atmospheric Environment. Materials 2024, 17, 5353. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17215353

AMA Style

Xiang L, Li F, Wu X, Zhang F, Tao J, Wang M, Lei W, Ran X, Wang H. Variation of Corrosion Characteristics and Tensile Performances of WE43 Alloy Under Marine Atmospheric Environment. Materials. 2024; 17(21):5353. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17215353

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xiang, Lin, Fei Li, Xinrui Wu, Feiyue Zhang, Jianquan Tao, Maochuan Wang, Wei Lei, Xudong Ran, and Hui Wang. 2024. "Variation of Corrosion Characteristics and Tensile Performances of WE43 Alloy Under Marine Atmospheric Environment" Materials 17, no. 21: 5353. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17215353

APA Style

Xiang, L., Li, F., Wu, X., Zhang, F., Tao, J., Wang, M., Lei, W., Ran, X., & Wang, H. (2024). Variation of Corrosion Characteristics and Tensile Performances of WE43 Alloy Under Marine Atmospheric Environment. Materials, 17(21), 5353. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17215353

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop