Next Article in Journal
Testing Mortars for 3D Printing: Correlation with Rheological Behavior
Previous Article in Journal
The Evolution of Dilatant Shear Bands in High-Pressure Die Casting for Al-Si Alloys
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

NO Emission Characteristics of Pulverized Coal Combustion in O2/N2 and O2/H2O Atmospheres in a Drop-Tube Furnace

1
School of Information Engineering, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing 210036, China
2
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen 518055, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(20), 4997; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17204997
Submission received: 9 September 2024 / Revised: 30 September 2024 / Accepted: 11 October 2024 / Published: 12 October 2024

Abstract

:
Oxy-steam combustion is a new oxy-fuel combustion technology. This paper focuses on the NO emission characteristics during the combustion of SF (Shen Fu) coal in O2/N2 and O2/H2O mixtures. Experiments were performed in a drop-tube furnace. Combustion tests were carried out in O2/N2 and O2/H2O atmospheres for various O2 concentrations (21%, 30%, 40%, and 60%) at different temperatures (1173 K, 1273 K, and 1373 K). In addition, combustion experiments at different excess oxygen ratios (λ) were conducted in O2/N2 and O2/H2O atmospheres. The influences of the atmosphere, oxygen concentration, temperature, and excess oxygen ratio on NO emissions were analyzed. The results show that the NO concentrations of SF coal combustion in the 21% O2/79% H2O atmosphere were much lower than those in the 21% O2/79% N2 atmosphere at the three temperatures considered. This was because a large amount of NO was decomposed during the SF coal combustion in the O2/H2O atmospheres. The reasons for the decomposition of NO include the selective non-catalytic reaction (SNCR) mechanism and char’s important role as a catalyst for the destruction of NO, either directly or by reacting with CO or H2. In oxy-steam combustion, the NO concentrations significantly increased with the increase in the oxygen concentration from 21 vol.% to 60 vol.% and the temperature from 1173 K to 1373 K. The excess oxygen ratio (λ) slightly impacted the NO emissions in the O2/H2O atmosphere.

1. Introduction

The energy produced by fossil fuel combustion results in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, the main reason for global warming; thus, reducing CO2 emissions is becoming increasingly important [1]. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an effective measure to control CO2 emissions. Oxy-fuel combustion, a promising CCS technology, has been a research hotspot of energy and combustion science in recent years due to its feasibility and low risk [2,3,4,5].
At present, oxy-fuel combustion technology is mainly represented by O2/CO2 recycle combustion. In O2/CO2 recycle combustion, fuels burn in mixtures of pure oxygen and recycled flue gas, resulting in a high concentration of CO2 in the flue gas, which is then ready for sequestration. The CO2 concentration in the flue gas is increased from approximately 17 to 70% by mass [6]. The advantages of O2/CO2 recycle combustion include higher coal reactivity, higher burnout rate, and lower NOx emissions [3]; the main disadvantages are higher economic costs and lower efficiency than air-fired power plants [7].
The Canadian Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology (CANMET) developed a new-generation oxy-fuel system based on oxy-steam combustion in 2007. Water/steam is used to moderate the flame temperature in an oxy-steam combustion system. The recycling system is not mandatory. The exhaust gas mainly contains steam and CO2, which can be sent for compression and sequestration after H2O condensation [8]. The CANMET has developed a novel oxy-steam burner for zero-emission power plants. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation and pilot-scale experimental results showed that oxy-steam combustion led to high CO2 concentrations (−90%) and low CO, moderate NOx, and typical SOx levels [9]. Seepana and Jayanti [10] proposed a power-generating system based on oxy-steam combustion called steam-moderated oxy-fuel combustion (SMOC). Compared with O2/CO2 recycle combustion, oxy-steam combustion has the following advantages [11]:
(1)
The overall system is simple, compact, and easy to start up and shut down due to the little recycled flue gas.
(2)
Oxy-steam combustion requires a much smaller amount of steam than O2/CO2 recycled combustion to achieve the same combustion temperature because of the significantly greater specific heat of steam compared with CO2. The system’s major and auxiliary equipment are smaller than those of the O2/CO2 recycled combustion system.
(3)
The formation of NOx and SOx in the boiler can be reduced owing to the introduction of steam.
(4)
The pumping costs associated with recycling are relatively low because the transmission medium is water and not flue gas.
The physical properties of H2O differ from those of N2 and CO2. Table 1 shows the physical properties of H2O, CO2, and N2. The heat capacity and mass diffusion coefficient of H2O are 1.26 and 1.34 times those of N2, respectively. Furthermore, the chemical properties of H2O are more active than those of N2 and CO2, such as its super-equilibrium radical effects and high chaperon efficiency [8]. Many researchers have investigated the effects of the physicochemical properties of H2O on the coal combustion process. The research results show that coal’s combustion characteristics and ignition mechanisms in the O2/H2O atmosphere differ from those in the O2/CO2 atmosphere [12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
The formation pathways of NOx follow three routes during coal combustion: thermal and prompt formation from N2 and the oxidation of fuel-N. Thermal NO evolves from the reaction of N2 and O2 at high temperatures (above 1800 K), described by the extended Zeldovich mechanism. Prompt NO is of minor importance and occurs predominantly under fuel-rich conditions. Fuel NO is produced via the conversion of fuel-N (volatile-N and char-N) during coal combustion and contributes most of the total NO emissions [19,20].
The NO formation characteristics under an oxy-steam atmosphere are expected to differ from conventional air combustion and O2/CO2 combustion. Many researchers have investigated the effect of H2O on the NOx precursor (NH3, HCN, and HCNO) formation during coal/biomass pyrolysis and gasification. The results show that NH3 is the major NOx precursor of coal gasification in the presence of H2O, and the H radical is important for NH3 formation [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Park et al. [26,27] found that HCN was the primary product of the char-N reaction with H2O, and it depended on the availability of hydrogen on the char surface. Steam can improve the concentrations of free radicals (mainly H and OH), H2, and CO [30].
Although few studies have been conducted on the NO formation characteristics of coal combustion in an oxy-steam atmosphere, the impacts of H2O on the NOx emissions in oxy-coal combustion under different conditions have been studied. The results indicate that NOx emissions are reduced by adding H2O [31,32,33,34,35].
This paper focuses on the NO formation characteristics during the combustion of Shen Fu coal in O2/H2O mixtures. The experiments were performed in a drop-tube furnace (DTF). Two combustion atmospheres were considered: O2/H2O and O2/N2. The oxygen concentration varied between 21 vol.% and 60 vol.%. Furthermore, the effects of the temperature and excess oxygen ratio on the NO formation characteristics in the O2/H2O atmosphere were considered.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Coal Sample

Shen Fu (SF) bituminous coal was used in this study. The properties of the coal samples are shown in Table 2. The coal samples were crushed, ground, and sieved before use to obtain a particle size fraction of 88–97 μm.

2.2. Test Facility

The experiments were carried out in an electrically heated DTF, as shown in Figure 1. The furnace was a cylindrical quartz tube with a total length of 1900 mm and an inner diameter of 30 mm. The heating zone was 1360 mm long. The DTF could work at a maximum temperature of 1373 K, and the furnace wall temperatures were continuously monitored with type-K thermocouples embedded in the wall.
The coal samples were fed using a micro-feeding device and introduced via an oil-cooled injector to ensure the temperature did not exceed 423 K before entering the reaction zone. The reaction stream for combustion was composed of primary and secondary streams. The flow rates of O2 and N2 from the gas cylinders were controlled with mass flow controllers. A vaporizer generated the steam, in which distilled water and the inlet gas were heated up to 423 K. A high-precision syringe pump was used to control the flow rate of the distilled water. The inlet gas was pre-heated and mixed with steam in the vaporizer. The steam was carried into the reactor via the inlet gas. The tubes between the vaporizer and reactor were wrapped with heating tape to maintain a constant temperature of 423 K.

2.3. Flue Gas Analysis

The exhaust flue gas was first passed through a filter to separate the fly ash, the water was removed from the condenser, and finally, it was dried before entering the analyzers. The gas composition of flue gas (including NO, SO2, O2, CO, and CO2) concentrations were measured with a KM9106 gas analyzer (Kane International Limited, Welwyn Garden City, UK). The NO was measured with an electrochemical sensor. The gas analyzer was calibrated before the combustion tests.

2.4. Combustion Conditions

The combustion tests were conducted in either O2/H2O or O2/N2 mixtures. During all experiments, the feed rate of the coal samples was kept constant at 0.3 g/min, and the ratio of the primary to secondary streams was one-fourth. Comparative experiments were carried out with different parameters to investigate the influences of the atmosphere, oxygen concentration, temperature, and excess oxygen ratio on the NO emissions. The combustion conditions are summarized in Table 3. The excess oxygen ratio was defined as follows:
λ = m O 2 / m fuel actual m O 2 / m fuel stoichiometric
The combustion experiment’s procedure is described as follows:
  • Check the airtightness of the combustion system before all tests.
  • Heat the reactor to the experimental temperature and adjust the gas flow rate to the corresponding value according to the combustion conditions.
  • Open the gas analyzer and monitor the flue gas composition in the reactor.
  • Start the micro-feeding device when the reaction gas composition reaches the designed experimental condition.
The emission concentrations were recorded after the steady-state and steady-flow conditions were reached.
Emission values must consider varying fuel mass inputs for a more accurate comparison of these combustion cases. Therefore, fuel-based emissions (mg/g coal feed) were used to capture the differences in the fuel mass input. The formula for calculating these fuel-based emissions was as follows:
X N O = C N O × Q B
where X N O is the fuel-based NO concentration (mg NO/g coal feed), C N O is the NO concentration measured in the flue gas (mg/m3), Q is the total flow rate of the flue gas converted to the condition of 1 atm and 273 K from the rate obtained with a wet gas meter (L/min) at the reactor outlet, and B is the fuel feed rate (g/min).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Atmosphere on NO Emissions

The Shen Fu coal was burned in O2/H2O and O2/N2 atmospheres at different temperatures. The NO concentrations (mg NO/g coal feed) are shown in Figure 2. Figure 2 demonstrates that the NO concentrations of SF coal combustion in the O2/H2O atmosphere were much lower than those in the O2/N2 atmosphere. Compared with the O2/N2 atmosphere, N2 was absent in the O2/H2O atmosphere; as such, thermal NO and prompt NO are absent during oxy-steam combustion. The temperature in the experiments was below 1373 K; thus, the proportion of thermal NO and prompt NO in the total NO was very low in the O2/N2 atmosphere. Consequently, the absence of N2 during oxy-steam combustion is not the main reason for the much lower NO concentration in the O2/H2O atmosphere.
The effect of steam on the conversation of fuel-N should be figured out to analyze the reason for the decreasing NO concentration in the O2/H2O atmosphere. The fuel-N was mainly transformed into volatile-N (NH3, HCN, and HCNO) and char-N during the coal devolatilization process. According to Tian’s study [22], when steam is present in the reactant gas, NH3 is the primary volatile-N product during the coal devolatilization process due to the amount of H produced from H2O, and the amount of volatile-N is larger than that in the corresponding O2/N2 atmosphere. Moreover, the hydrolysis reaction of HCN (R1) is enhanced in a high-steam-concentration atmosphere with a temperature exceeding 650 °C, resulting in an amount of HCN being converted to NH3 [36]. Consequently, NH3 is the predominant product of volatile-N during oxy-steam combustion.
HCN + H2O → NH3 + CO
Meanwhile, the char-N is transformed into a gaseous nitrogen-containing compound via a set of heterogeneous reactions. Park found that HCN was the primary product of the reaction of char-N with H2O, and the amount of available hydrogen greatly affected the formation rate of HCN [26,27]. The studies by Chang and McKenzie showed that the NH3 yield was much higher when steam was added to the atmosphere during coal gasification, and the HCN was also slightly higher [21,25]. They claimed that steam was vital in converting coal/char-N into NH3 by providing H on the char surface. Consequently, the proportion of char-N converted into NH3 and HCN should be much higher in an O2/H2O atmosphere than in an O2/N2 atmosphere with an identical O2 concentration.
In summary, the absence of steam promotes fuel-N to transform into NH3 and HCN in an O2/H2O atmosphere. Steam can also affect the conversion of NH3 and HCN. According to the previous studies by Yue [29] and He [37], the concentration of OH is higher in an O2/H2O atmosphere than in an O2/N2 atmosphere due to the enhancement of R2 and R3 in a high-steam concentration atmosphere [38].
2OH → O + H2O
H + H2O → OH + H2
The conversion reaction (R4 and R5) of HCN to NO is enhanced due to the high concentration of OH in an O2/H2O atmosphere.
HNO + OH → NO + H2O
NH + H2O → HNO + H2
The rate of product of R5 drastically increases due to the chaperone effect of H2O. HCN→NCO→HNCO→NH2→NH→HNO→NO becomes the main pathway of NO formation from HCN in an O2/H2O atmosphere.
In addition, the conversion rate of NH3 to NO in O2/H2O atmospheres compared with O2/N2 atmospheres is enhanced due to the high concentration of H2O, and the pathway of NH3→NH2→NH→HNO→NO is predominant in O2/H2O atmospheres.
Consequently, the conversion rates of HCN and NH3 to NO in O2/H2O atmospheres are higher than in O2/N2 atmospheres. Thus, the NO formation from the oxidation of fuel-N is enhanced in an O2/H2O atmosphere. Two opposed mechanisms affect the NO concentration during coal combustion: the NO formation and reduction mechanisms. Consequently, the NO emissions largely depend on the competition between the NO formation and destruction mechanisms.
Based on this analysis, a high steam concentration is beneficial to the large proportion of fuel-N converted to NH3 and HCN and of NH3 and HCN converted to NO in O2/H2O atmospheres. The NO emissions, however, are much lower in an O2/H2O atmosphere than in an O2/N2 atmosphere with an identical O2 concentration, as shown in Figure 2. This means that a large amount of NO is decomposed during coal combustion in an O2/H2O atmosphere via the NO destruction reaction.
One reason for the decomposition of NO is the selective non-catalytic reaction (SNCR) mechanism [39,40]:
4NH3 + 4NO + O2 → 4N2 + 6H2O
Because of the large amount of NH3 formation in an O2/H2O atmosphere, some percentage of the NH3 becomes a reductant at temperatures of 1073–1373 K.
Another reason is that the char plays an important role as a catalyst for the destruction of NO, either directly or by reacting with CO or H2 [41].
2NO + 2CO → N2 + 2CO2
2NO + 2H2 → N2 + 2H2O
In an O2/H2O atmosphere, steam gasification reaction R9 produces a large amount of CO, and the steam shift reaction R10 produces a large amount of H2; thus, the concentrations of H2 and CO are much higher than those in an O2/N2 atmosphere. Consequently, a significant amount of NO is decomposed in an O2/H2O atmosphere.
C + H2O → CO + H
CO + H2O → H2 + CO2

3.2. Effect of Oxygen Concentration on NO Emissions

Figure 3 shows the NO emissions versus oxygen concentration at different temperatures in an O2/H2O atmosphere. In the oxygen concentration range of 21 vol.%–60 vol.%, the NO concentration increased with the increasing oxygen concentration, and the increase in the NO emissions at a temperature of 1373 K was faster than that at 1173 and 1273 K. The oxidizing atmosphere gradually strengthened with the increasing oxygen concentration in the reactant, resulting in the oxidation of NH3 and HCN into NO. Meanwhile, the reducing atmosphere weakened as the oxygen concentration increased; thus, the decomposition amount of NO decreased. In addition, at a lower steam concentration, the gas residence time was increased at the lower total flow rate (at 1173 K, 1273 K, and 1373 K). The increased oxygen concentration resulted in a higher flame temperature. Thus, the conversion of fuel-N into NO was promoted due to the longer residence time and higher flame temperature, and the NO concentration was higher with the higher oxygen concentration.

3.3. Effect of Temperature on NO Emissions

The NO emissions at different temperatures with an oxygen concentration varying from 21% to 60% in O2/H2O mixtures are shown in Figure 4. Figure 4 demonstrates that the NO emissions increased as the temperature increased in the O2/H2O atmosphere. The NO emissions increased by almost two times from 1173 K to 1373 K in the O2/H2O atmosphere. The transformation and oxidation of fuel-N were accelerated with the increasing combustion temperature. Furthermore, at high temperatures, the water vapor diluted the reductive gas atmosphere and shortened the gas residence time in the reactor to weaken the reduction of NO. Therefore, the NO emissions increased. Even in the 60% O2/40% H2O atmosphere, the NO emissions were still much lower than those in the 21% O2/79% N2 (air) atmosphere at the temperatures of 1173 K, 1273 K, and 1373 K. Hence, a remarkable amount of NO was reduced in the O2/H2O atmosphere. The reduction of NO plays an important role in the transformation of fuel-N in an O2/H2O atmosphere.

3.4. Effect of Excess Oxygen Ratio on NO Emissions

The effect of the excess oxygen ratio (λ) on the NO emissions was investigated in this study. As the coal feed rate was kept constant, λ was varied by changing the total reaction gas flow rate. Figure 5 shows the NO emissions at different excess oxygen ratios in 21% O2/79% H2O and 21% O2/79% N2. Figure 5 indicates that the NO concentration monotonically and significantly increased with the increasing λ in the O2/N2 atmosphere, while it slightly increased in the O2/H2O atmosphere. This may be because although the oxidation of fuel-N increased with the increase in the O2 amount, the reduction of NO in the O2/H2O atmosphere also increased with the increase in the H2O amount.

4. Conclusions

The NO formation characteristics during the combustion of Shen Fu coal in O2/H2O and O2/N2 mixtures were investigated experimentally in a drop-tube furnace.
The NO concentrations (mg NO/g coal feed) were compared between 21% O2/79% H2O and 21% O2/79% N2 atmospheres at 1173 K, 1273 K, and 1373 K. The results show that the NO concentrations of SF coal combustion in the 21% O2/79% H2O atmosphere were much lower than those in the 21% O2/79% N2 atmosphere at these three temperatures. Although water vapor is conducive to NO formation, the NO reduction reaction is dominant during the coal combustion process in an O2/H2O atmosphere. The reasons for the decomposition of NO include the selective non-catalytic reaction (SNCR) mechanism and the important role that char plays as a catalyst for the destruction of NO, either directly or by reacting with CO or H2.
The NO concentrations significantly increased with the increasing oxygen concentration. High oxygen concentrations create an oxidizing environment, which enhances the NO formation reaction. In addition, a longer residence time and higher flame temperature also contribute to the NO increase at a higher oxygen concentration. NO concentration increased with the increasing temperature in both the O2/H2O and O2/N2 conditions. This was caused by the acceleration of the fuel-N oxidation reaction. Moreover, the reduction reaction of NO was weakened due to the shortened residence time. The results show that the excess oxygen ratio (λ) slightly impacts the NO emissions in an O2/H2O atmosphere.
The results obtained can provide a better understanding of NO emission mechanism of coal combustion in O2/H2O atmosphere. Future work is planned on different coals with lower nitrogen content.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Z.; methodology, S.C.; software, S.C.; validation, C.W.; formal analysis, J.Y.; investigation, L.Z. and S.C.; resources, C.H.; data curation, L.Z. and C.W.; writing—original draft preparation, L.Z.; writing—review and editing, L.Z. and S.C.; visualization, J.F.; supervision, S.C.; project administration, J.F.; funding acquisition, L.Z. and C.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (No. 20KJB480005 and No. 24KJB430017).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dziejarski, B.; Krzyżyńska, R.; Andersson, K. Current status of carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies in the global economy: A survey of technical assessment. Fuel 2023, 342, 127776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bui, M.; Adjiman, C.S.; Bardow, A.; Anthony, E.J.; Boston, A.; Brown, S.; Fennell, P.S.; Fuss, S.; Galindo, A.; Hackett, L.A.; et al. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): The way forward. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 1062–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Toftegaard, M.B.; Brix, J.; Jensen, P.A.; Glarborg, P.; Jensen, A.D. Oxy-fuel combustion of solid fuels. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2010, 36, 581–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yin, C.; Yan, J. Oxy-fuel combustion of pulverized fuels: Combustion fundamentals and modeling. Appl. Energy 2016, 162, 742–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gür, T.M. Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Capture, Storage and Utilization: Review of Materials, Processes and Technologies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2022, 89, 100965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Buhre, B.; Elliott, L.; Sheng, C.; Gupta, R.; Wall, T. Oxy-fuel combustion technology for coal-fired power generation. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2005, 31, 283–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yadav, S.; Mondal, S.S. A review on the progress and prospects of oxy-fuel carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology. Fuel 2022, 308, 122057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cai, L.; Zou, C. Chapter 15—Oxy-Steam Combustion. In Oxy-Fuel Combustion; Zheng, C., Liu, Z., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 325–338. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zou, C.; Zhang, L.; Cao, S.; Zheng, C. A study of combustion characteristics of pulverized coal in O2/H2O atmosphere. Fuel 2014, 115, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Seepana, S.; Jayanti, S. Steam-moderated oxy-fuel combustion. Energy Convers. Manag. 2010, 51, 1981–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jin, B.; Zhao, H.; Zou, C.; Zheng, C. Comprehensive investigation of process characteristics for oxy-steam combustion power plants. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 99, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, L.; Duan, L.; Tong, S.; Anthony, E.J. Combustion characteristics of lignite char in a fluidized bed under O2/N2, O2/CO2 and O2/H2O atmospheres. Fuel Process. Technol. 2019, 186, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cai, L.; Zou, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, K.; Han, Q.; Zheng, C. Numerical and experimental studies on the ignition of pulverized coal in O2/H2O atmospheres. Fuel 2015, 139, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yi, B.; Zhang, L.; Huang, F.; Mao, Z.; Zheng, C. Effect of H2O on the combustion characteristics of pulverized coal in O2/CO2 atmosphere. Appl. Energy 2014, 132, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zou, C.; Cai, L.; Wu, D.; Liu, Y.; Liu, S.; Zheng, C. Ignition behaviors of pulverized coal particles in O2/N2 and O2/H2O mixtures in a drop tube furnace using flame monitoring techniques. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2015, 35, 3629–3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Riaza, J.; Álvarez, L.; Gil, M.V.; Pevida, C.; Pis, J.J.; Rubiera, F. Effect of oxy-fuel combustion with steam addition on coal ignition and burnout in an entrained flow reactor. Energy 2011, 36, 5314–5319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yadav, S.; Mondal, S.S. Numerical Investigation of the Effect of CO2/H2O Composition in Oxidizer on Flow Field and Combustion Behavior of Oxy-pulverized Coal Combustion. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2021, 193, 2783–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dueso, C.; Mayoral, M.C.; Andrés, J.M.; Escudero, A.I.; Díez, L.I. Towards oxy-steam combustion: The effect of increasing the steam concentration on coal reactivity. Fuel 2019, 239, 534–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Normann, F.; Andersson, K.; Leckner, B.; Johnsson, F. Emission control of nitrogen oxides in the oxy-fuel process. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2009, 35, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Glarborg, P.; Jensen, A.D.; Johnsson, J.E. Fuel nitrogen conversion in solid fuel fired systems. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2003, 29, 89–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chang, L.; Xie, Z.; Xie, K.-C.; Pratt, K.C.; Hayashi, J.-i.; Chiba, T.; Li, C.-Z. Formation of NOx precursors during the pyrolysis of coal and biomass. Part VI. Effects of gas atmosphere on the formation of NH3 and HCN☆. Fuel 2003, 82, 1159–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tian, F.-J.; Yu, J.-L.; McKenzie, L.J.; Hayashi, J.-I.; Chiba, T.; Li, C.-Z. Formation of NOx precursors during the pyrolysis of coal and biomass. Part VII. Pyrolysis and gasification of cane trash with steam. Fuel 2005, 84, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chang, L.P.; Xie, Z.L.; Xie, K.C. Study on the Formation of NH3 and HCN During the Gasification of Brown Coal in Steam. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2006, 84, 446–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. McKenzie, L.J.; Tian, F.J.; Li, C.Z. NH3 formation and destruction during the gasification of coal in oxygen and steam. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 5505–5509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. McKenzie, L.J.; Tian, F.-J.; Guo, X.; Li, C.-Z. NH3 and HCN formation during the gasification of three rank-ordered coals in steam and oxygen. Fuel 2008, 87, 1102–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Park, D.-C.; Day, S.J.; Nelson, P.F. Nitrogen release during reaction of coal char with O2, CO2, and H2O. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2005, 30, 2169–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Park, D.-C.; Day, S.J.; Nelson, P.F. Formation of N-containing gas-phase species from char gasification in steam. Fuel 2008, 87, 807–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yan, X.; Duan, C.; Sun, R.; Ji, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chu, H. Revealing the nitrogen migration mechanism during pyrolysis and steam gasification of biomass: A combined ReaxFF MD and DFT study. Fuel 2024, 369, 131739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yue, S.; Wang, C.; Huang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Xing, J.; Anthony, E.J. The role of H2O in structural nitrogen migration during coal devolatilization under oxy-steam combustion conditions. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 225, 107040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, S.; Wei, X.; Guo, X. Effect of H2O Vapor on NO Reduction by CO: Experimental and Kinetic Modeling Study. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 4277–4283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Álvarez, L.; Riaza, J.; Gil, M.V.; Pevida, C.; Pis, J.J.; Rubiera, F. NO emissions in oxy-coal combustion with the addition of steam in an entrained flow reactor. Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 2011, 1, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhu, C.; Liu, S.; Liu, H.; Yang, J.; Liu, X.; Xu, G. NOx emission characteristics of fluidized bed combustion in atmospheres rich in oxygen and water vapor for high-nitrogen fuel. Fuel 2015, 139, 346–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lei, M.; Sun, C.; Zou, C.; Mi, H.; Wang, C. Effect of H2O on the NO emission characteristics of pulverized coal during oxy-fuel combustion. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 11767–11774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lei, M.; Cen, S.; Wang, C. Effect of CO2 and H2O Gasifications on the Burning Behavior and NO Release Process of Pulverized Coal at Low Oxygen Concentrations during Oxy-Fuel Combustion. J. Energy Eng. 2019, 145, 04019003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yue, S.; Wang, C.; Xu, Z.; Wang, D.; Zheng, F.; Anthony, E.J. The role of H2O in NO formation and reduction during oxy-steam combustion of bituminous coal char. Combust. Flame 2022, 237, 111883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schäfer, S.; Bonn, B. Hydrolysis of HCN as an important step in nitrogen oxide formation in fluidised combustion. Part 1. Homogeneous reactions. Fuel 2000, 79, 1239–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zou, C.; He, Y.; Song, Y.; Han, Q.; Liu, Y.; Guo, F.; Zheng, C. The characteristics and mechanism of the NO formation during oxy-steam combustion. Fuel 2015, 158, 874–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zou, C.; Song, Y.; Li, G.; Cao, S.; He, Y.; Zheng, C. The chemical mechanism of steam’s effect on the temperature in methane oxy-steam combustion. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2014, 75, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pels, J.R. Nitrous Oxide from Coal Combustion. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lin, W.Y. Interactions between SO2 and NOx Emissions in Fluidised Bed Combustion of Coal. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  41. Andersson, K.; Normann, F.; Johnsson, F.; Leckner, B. NO Emission during Oxy-Fuel Combustion of Lignite. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 1835–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of the drop-tube furnace and auxiliary equipment.
Figure 1. Schematic of the drop-tube furnace and auxiliary equipment.
Materials 17 04997 g001
Figure 2. NO concentrations of SF pulverized coal under different atmospheres.
Figure 2. NO concentrations of SF pulverized coal under different atmospheres.
Materials 17 04997 g002
Figure 3. NO concentration versus oxygen concentration at different temperatures in O2/H2O atmosphere.
Figure 3. NO concentration versus oxygen concentration at different temperatures in O2/H2O atmosphere.
Materials 17 04997 g003
Figure 4. NO concentration versus temperature at different oxygen concentrations.
Figure 4. NO concentration versus temperature at different oxygen concentrations.
Materials 17 04997 g004
Figure 5. NO concentration versus excess oxygen ratio under different atmospheres (21% O2).
Figure 5. NO concentration versus excess oxygen ratio under different atmospheres (21% O2).
Materials 17 04997 g005
Table 1. Physical properties of H2O, CO2, and N2 (1000 K; 0.1 MPa).
Table 1. Physical properties of H2O, CO2, and N2 (1000 K; 0.1 MPa).
ParameterH2OCO2N2 H 2 O N 2 H 2 O C O 2
Density (kg/m3)0.220.540.340.640.41
Heat capacity (J/mol K)41.2954.3232.711.260.76
Heat conductivity (W/m K)0.0970.0710.0661.471.38
Dynamic viscosity (Pa s)3.76 × 10−54.13 × 10−54.16 × 10−50.90.91
Thermal diffusivity (m2/s)1.95 × 10−41.08 × 10−41.68 × 10−41.161.81
Mass diffuse coefficient (m2/s)1.27 × 10−48.25 × 10−59.48 × 10−51.341.54
Table 2. Properties of coal samples.
Table 2. Properties of coal samples.
Proximate Analysis (wt%, ad)Ultimate Analysis (wt%, ad)Qnet,ar (MJ/kg)
MoistureVolatile MatterAshFixed CarbonCHO (By Difference)NS23.15
6.4336.952.8653.7666.054.4319.010.840.38
Table 3. Operation conditions for combustion experiments.
Table 3. Operation conditions for combustion experiments.
ModeTemperature (K)O2 Concentration (vol. %)Total Volume Flow Rate (STP, L/min)λ
O2/H2O
O2/N2
1173 K
1273 K
1373 K
21
30
40
60
1.60.83
1.19
1.58
2.38
O2/N21373 K211.150.6
1.540.8
1.921
2.311.2
2.691.4
O2/H2O1373 K211.370.6
2.060.8
2.561
3.081.2
3.621.4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, L.; Fan, J.; Wang, C.; Yuan, J.; Hao, C.; Cao, S. NO Emission Characteristics of Pulverized Coal Combustion in O2/N2 and O2/H2O Atmospheres in a Drop-Tube Furnace. Materials 2024, 17, 4997. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17204997

AMA Style

Zhang L, Fan J, Wang C, Yuan J, Hao C, Cao S. NO Emission Characteristics of Pulverized Coal Combustion in O2/N2 and O2/H2O Atmospheres in a Drop-Tube Furnace. Materials. 2024; 17(20):4997. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17204997

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Liang, Jun Fan, Changlin Wang, Jiaqi Yuan, Cen Hao, and Shiying Cao. 2024. "NO Emission Characteristics of Pulverized Coal Combustion in O2/N2 and O2/H2O Atmospheres in a Drop-Tube Furnace" Materials 17, no. 20: 4997. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17204997

APA Style

Zhang, L., Fan, J., Wang, C., Yuan, J., Hao, C., & Cao, S. (2024). NO Emission Characteristics of Pulverized Coal Combustion in O2/N2 and O2/H2O Atmospheres in a Drop-Tube Furnace. Materials, 17(20), 4997. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17204997

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop