Next Article in Journal
Theoretical Study of Co-Doping Effects with Different Ions on the Multiferroic Properties of BiFeO3 Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Manufacturing of Ni-Co-Fe-Cr-Al-Ti High-Entropy Alloy Using Directed Energy Deposition and Evaluation of Its Microstructure, Tensile Strength, and Microhardness
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improvements in Resistive and Capacitive Switching Behaviors in Ga2O3 Memristors via High-Temperature Annealing Process
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lithiophilic Reduced Graphene Oxide/Carbonized Zeolite Imidazolate Framework-8 Composite Host for Stable Li Metal Anodes

1
Department of Battery Convergence Engineering, Kangwon University, 1, Kangwondaehak-gil, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea
2
Interdisciplinary Program in Advanced Functional Materials and Devices Development, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Environmental Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Integrated Energy and Infra System, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(17), 4300; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17174300
Submission received: 17 July 2024 / Revised: 28 August 2024 / Accepted: 28 August 2024 / Published: 30 August 2024

Abstract

:
Lithium (Li) metal is regarded as a next-generation anode material owing to its high energy density. However, issues such as dendritic growth and volume changes during charging and discharging pose significant challenges for commercialization. We propose using lithiophilic reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and carbonized zeolite imidazolate framework-8 (C-ZIF-8) composites as host materials for Li to address these problems. The rGO/C-ZIF-8 composites are synthesized through a simple redox reaction followed by carbonization and are characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The roles of chemical composition, characteristics, and morphology are demonstrated. As a result of these favorable structural and functional properties, the Li symmetric cell with rGO/C-ZIF-8 exhibits a stable voltage profile for more than 100 h at 1 mA cm−2 without short-circuiting. A relatively low Li plating/stripping overpotential of ~101.5 mV at a high current density of 10 mA cm−2 is confirmed. Moreover, a rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li full cell paired with a LiFePO4 cathode demonstrates good cyclability and rate capability.

1. Introduction

The requirement for energy storage devices with high energy density has become critical with the rapid increase in demand for electric vehicles. However, the currently commercialized graphite anode, with a theoretical capacity of 372 mAh g1, does not satisfy these requirements [1,2]. Lithium (Li) metal has been emphasized as a next-generation anode for Li-S, Li-O2, and all solid-state batteries because of its high theoretical capacity (3860 mAh g1), low electrochemical reduction potential (−3.04 V vs. SHE), and low gravimetric density (0.534 g cm3) [3]. Despite these advantages, Li metal anodes face significant challenges due to Li dendrite growth and substantial volume changes, resulting in the destruction of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer. This destruction causes the exposed Li surface to react with the electrolyte, resulting in repeated SEI layer regeneration and, consequently, high overpotential and cell short circuits [4]. Thus, Li dendrite growth degrades lifespan characteristics and rate performance, causing safety issues and posing significant challenges for commercialization [5,6].
Despite these challenges, innovative solutions are being developed to overcome the limitations of Li metal anodes. Various approaches have been explored to address the challenges posed by Li dendrite growth [7,8,9], but each has significant limitations that hinder its effectiveness. First, solid-state electrolytes, which are relatively safer than liquid electrolytes, can mechanically suppress dendrite growth. However, they have low ionic conductivity and high interfacial resistance between the active material and electrolyte. These issues significantly impede the overall performance of the battery and present substantial barriers to commercialization [10,11,12]. Second, the introduction of electrolyte additives to form a stable SEI layer can inhibit dendrite growth. However, this solution is not without its flaws. The SEI layer often undergoes repeated breakdown and regeneration during charge/discharge cycles, leading to continuous consumption of the electrolyte and loss of active Li. Additionally, the significant volume changes during cycling exacerbate these issues, ultimately limiting the long-term stability of the battery [13,14,15]. Finally, the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) hosts with large specific surface areas can reduce local current density, thereby inhibiting dendrite growth and providing space to accommodate volume changes. Initially, studies were conducted on 3D metal framework structures such as 3D nickel foam and 3D porous copper current collectors [16,17,18]. However, these structures have reduced energy density owing to their high specific gravity. This trade-off between structural stability and energy density makes it challenging to develop a viable solution for practical applications. Consequently, carbon-based host materials (such as CNT, graphene, and carbon cloth) have been reported as stable hosts for Li metal anodes [19,20,21,22]. However, most carbon-based host materials exhibit lithiophobic characteristics, which hinder uniform Li plating/stripping [23]. Therefore, the introduction of additional lithiophilic materials is essential to achieve stable Li plating/stripping and inhibit dendrite growth.
Recent research regarding the increased adsorption of Li on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) with structural defects, such as oxygen functional groups has been reported [24,25]. In particular, oxygen functional groups on rGO, especially carbonyl groups, act as lithiophilic sites that facilitate homogeneous Li metal deposition and prevent dendrite growth [26,27,28,29]. Moreover, 3D lithiophilic host materials prevent Li dendrite growth [30,31,32]. A zeolite imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) is a 3D structure composed of Zn2+ and 2-methylimidazole organic linkers, which possesses a sodalite zeolite-type structure [33,34] providing excellent thermal and chemical stability [35]. Moreover, a 3D framework containing lithiophilic materials such as Zn and N plays a crucial role in improving the uniformity of Li deposition and reducing the Li nucleation energy barrier [31,36,37,38], and it has a large specific surface area and pore volume, which can reduce local current density and accommodate significant volume changes. However, owing to the combination of Zn and N, it exhibits lithiophobic characteristics. Therefore, after carbonization, ZIF-8 can be transformed into porous carbon-containing Zn clusters and N atoms.
Herein, we synthesized a rGO/C-ZIF-8 composite including 3D lithiophilic carbonized ZIF-8 using a simple redox process and carbonization method for Li metal reservoir host materials. Because of the lithiophilic Zn and N of C-ZIF-8 and oxygen functional groups on rGO in the composite, it demonstrates stable plating/stripping behavior in Li symmetric cells; furthermore, it can achieve cyclability and rate capability in a full cell system with a LiFePO4 cathode.

2. Experimental Methods

2.1. Preparation of rGO/C-ZIF-8

rGO/C-ZIF-8 composites were synthesized from commercial graphene oxide (GO, Angstron Materials) and zinc metal (<10 μm, ≥98%, Aldrich) through a spontaneous redox reaction [39], with the addition of 2-methylimidazole (99%, Aldrich) and carbonization. First, 20 g of GO was ultrasonicated in 380 mL of deionized water at 10 °C for 45 min using a 750 W sonicator operating at a frequency of 20 kHz. Subsequently, 200 mg zinc metal powder was added to the GO solution and stirred at room temperature over 12 h. During this process, ZnO nanoparticles were deposited on the GO surface, accompanied by the partial reduction of GO to partially reduced graphene oxide (PrGO) via an electrochemical redox reaction [39]. Next, 24.2 g of 2-methylimidazole was added to the PrGO/ZnO solution and stirred at room temperature for 24 h. Simultaneously, the molar ratio of Zn2+–2-methylimidazol–deionized water was set to 1:60:2228 [40]. Subsequently, the obtained composites were freeze-dried at −50 °C for three days. Finally, the obtained powders were carbonized by heating at a rate of 5 °C/min to 600 °C in Ar for 3 h (gas flow rate: 500 cc/min). To synthesize rGO for the control samples, GO was heated at 600 °C in Ar for 3 h.

2.2. Materials Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD, X’Pert PRO MPD, PANalytical) was used to investigate the structural properties from 5° to 80°, measured using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5419 Å). The morphologies and microstructures of the synthesized composites were examined by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, Hitachi S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). X-ray photon electron spectroscopy (XPS, Al Kα X-ray source (Ep = 1486.7 eV) at a pressure of 5 × 10 9 mbar or better, Thermo VG (ThermoFisher SCIENTIFIC, Waltham, MA, USA)) was performed to obtain the elemental compositions and chemical states of the different carbon materials.

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

The electrochemical properties of rGO/C-ZIF-8 and rGO-based working electrodes were analyzed using a CR2032 coin cell at room temperature. Various electrodes were prepared by mixing 80 wt.% of the active material (rGO/C-ZIF-8, rGO) and 20 wt.% polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF, Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) as a binder dissolved in N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP). To fabricate the electrodes, the mixed slurry was coated on Cu foil by a doctor blade and dried in an oven at 70 °C for 12 h. Subsequently, working electrodes with an area of ~1.131 cm2 were assembled in coin cells with a Li disk (ϕ16(D) × 0.4 mm(T)) as the reference electrode and counter electrode in an Ar-filled glove box (MBRAUN, O2, and H2O < 0.1 ppm). In addition, 1 M lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in a mixture of 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) and 2-dimethoxyethane (DME) (DOL/DME, volume ratio 1:1) with 3 wt.% LiNO3 was used as the electrolyte, and microporous polyethylene film (Celgard 2400, Charlotte, NC, USA) was used as a separator. The coin cells were assembled in the following order: bottom casing, working electrode, separator, Li disk, spacer, wave spring, and top casing. Galvanostatic charge/discharge tests were conducted on a battery cycler (BTS-4008, NEWARE, Shenzhen, China). To form a stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), the batteries were first cycled three times between 0.01 V and 1 V at 50 μA. After pre-cycling, 4 mAh cm2 of Li was plated on rGO/C-ZIF-8, rGO, and Cu foil with a current density of 1 mA cm2. LiFePO4 (LFP) was fabricated as a cathode material for testing the full cell of the lithiated anodes (rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li, rGO-Li, and Cu-Li). The cathode was composed of 89 wt.% LFP, 3 wt.% carbon black conductive material, and 8 wt.% Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) binder dissolved in NMP (N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidone) (NMP). The loading mass of LFP was approximately 8.9 mg cm2, and the density of LFP was approximately 1.7 g cm3. The full cells were cycled from 2.5 V to 4.2 V at 1 C.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Preparation and Characterization of rGO/C-ZIF-8

Figure 1 illustrates the synthesis procedure of rGO/C-ZIF-8 composites, which consists of a spontaneous redox reaction, followed by the addition of 2-methylimidazole and carbonization. First, Zn reduces GO partially because of their standard reduction potential difference. The reduction potential of Zn is −0.76 V (Zn/Zn+ vs. SHE), and the potential of functional groups on GO is lower (−0.4 V vs. SHE). Hence, the Zn metal particles are transformed to ZnO, and GO undergoes partial spontaneous reduction [39]. Next, 2-methylimidazole is added to the PrGO/ZnO dispersion to induce the formation of ZIF-8 on the graphene [40]. Finally, the PrGO is reduced, and the ZIF-8 is carbonized to synthesize the rGO/C-ZIF-8 composite.
The XRD patterns are illustrated in Figure 2a. The absence of the (002) peak of GO in the XRD pattern of rGO indicates thermal reduction of GO to rGO. This sample exhibited the typical (002) plane of rGO at 2 θ = ~24° because of the reduction [39]. In the case of PrGO/ZnO, the coexistence of peaks corresponding to GO and rGO confirms that GO was partially reduced, and the presence of characteristic peaks of ZnO (JCPDS card No. 36-1451) indicates that Zn metal was oxidized to ZnO. Furthermore, the presence of peaks of ZIF-8 (COD card No. 96-711-1974) confirms the successful synthesis of PrGO/ZIF-8 through the addition of 2-methylimidazole [40]. Figure 2b illustrates the XPS survey spectra of GO, rGO, and PrGO/ZIF-8. The spectra for GO and rGO indicate the presence of carbon (C 1s) and oxygen (O 1s) at approximately 285 and 533 eV, respectively. However, in the spectra for PrGO/ZIF-8, the presence of ZIF-8 results in additional peaks corresponding to nitrogen (N 1s) and zinc (Zn LMM, Zn 2p3/2, and Zn 2p1/2) at approximately 398, 498, 1020, and 1043 eV, respectively, together with the peaks for carbon and oxygen [41].
Figure 2c–f illustrate the C 1s and N 1s spectra of each sample. The C 1s spectrum was deconvoluted into components representing the carbon skeleton (C=C, C-C) and oxygen functional groups such as epoxy (C-O), carbonyl (C=O), and carboxyl groups (-COOH) [42]. For PrGO/ZIF-8, the C 1s spectrum was additionally deconvoluted to include C-N bonding, confirming the presence of 2-methylimidazole within the composite. Additionally, the deconvolution of the N 1s spectrum for PrGO/ZIF-8 revealed the presence of C-N and Zn-N bonding, further verifying the incorporation of ZIF-8 within the composite [43].
Figure 3a illustrates the XRD patterns of PrGO/ZIF-8 and rGO/C-ZIF-8 before and after the carbonization process. The XRD pattern of PrGO/ZIF-8 before carbonization exhibits peaks associated with ZIF-8 (COD card No. 96-711-1974). However, after carbonization, the XRD pattern of rGO/C-ZIF-8 shows only peaks related to carbon, indicating successful carbonization [30,31].
Figure 3b illustrates the SEM images of PrGO/ZIF-8 and rGO/C-ZIF-8. The SEM image of PrGO/ZIF-8 before carbonization reveals the presence of 1 μm-sized ZIF-8 on the graphene. The SEM image of rGO/C-ZIF-8 after carbonization indicates that the morphology of ZIF-8 remains intact, confirming structure preservation during the carbonization process [44].

3.2. Li Plating Process on the rGO/C-ZIF-8 Composite

To evaluate the electrochemical properties of the prepared rGO/C-ZIF-8 as a Li metal host material, symmetric cell tests were conducted using rGO/C-ZIF-8, Cu, and rGO host electrodes. Before Li plating, the half cells were cycled three times at 0–1 V (vs. Li/Li+) at 0.05 mA cm1 to form a stable SEI film (Figure S1) [20,45,46]. The Li storage capacity of the rGO/C-ZIF-8 electrode between 0 and 1 V was approximately 2.421 mAh cm2, which was superior to the Li storage capacity values of Cu (~0.001 mAh cm2) and rGO (~1.096 mAh cm2). When Li was plated on each electrode at various current densities with an areal capacity of 1.5 mAh cm2 (Figure S2), it was confirmed that the Li plating overpotential of the rGO/C-ZIF-8 electrode was lower than those of the Cu and rGO host electrodes (Figure 4 and Table S1). This result indicates that the Zn and N of C-ZIF-8 and oxygen functional groups on rGO act as lithiophilic sites in the composite to reduce the Li plating overpotential compared with those of rGO and Cu [47].

3.3. Li Plating/Stripping Behavior of the rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li Electrode

Li-plated samples (Cu-Li, rGO-Li, and rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li) were fabricated at a 1 mA cm2 current density for 4 h (areal capacity: 4 mAh cm2) for the symmetric cell test. As illustrated in Figure 5a and Table S2, the symmetric cells of the Cu-Li and rGO-Li electrodes failed after 49 and 87 h with high initial plating overpotentials of 66.7 and 38.4 mV, respectively. The rapid increase in voltage hysteresis is attributed to the formation of cracks within the electrode due to volume changes, leading to localized Li-ion flux concentration at the crack sites and subsequent dendritic growth, which accelerates electrolyte depletion. However, rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li demonstrated lower plating overpotential (30.5 mV), and the voltage profile did not show a gradual increase, indicating the absence of a short circuit via dendrite for more than 100 h. rGO/C-ZIF-8 is lithiophilic because of the formation of an N-doped carbon coating, and its porous structure enhances Li ion distribution while also acting as a barrier to prevent Li dendrite formation, leading to improved cycling performance. Consequently, improved cyclic stability and lower overpotential confirmed that using rGO/C-ZIF-8 composites for Li host materials could lead to a stable Li plating/stripping performance. Moreover, Figure 5b and Table S3 show the rate performance of each sample at current densities from 0.5 to 10 mA cm2 with an areal capacity of 1 mAh cm2. The symmetric cell with Cu-Li showed high plating/stripping overpotential values of 35.0, 51.2, 86.9, 162.2, 370.3, and 224.5 mV, and rGO-Li showed high plating/stripping overpotential values of 21.6, 29.9, 41.2, 59.3, 90.2, and 203.4 mV at current densities of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 mA cm2, respectively. In comparison, the rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li symmetric cell demonstrated pronounced lower overpotential values of 21.2, 27.5, 40.8, 52.1, 72.6, and 123.5 mV at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 mA cm2.

3.4. Practical Applicability of rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li in Full Cells

To evaluate the potential application of the rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li electrode, full cells based on the rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li anode and an LFP(LiFePO4) cathode were assembled. As illustrated in Figure 6a,c and Figure S3, the cycling performance of the rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li full cell exhibited desirable cycling stability with a high discharge capacity of 112 mAh g1 and Coulombic efficiency (CE) of 99.8% at a 1 C-rate for 250 cycles, compared with rGO-Li (37 mAh g1, 98.7%) and Cu-Li (21.9 mAh g1, 98.4%). Moreover, the rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li full cell exhibited a high-rate capability of 69.1 mAh g1 at a 5 C-rate, compared with Cu-Li (45.1 mAh g1) and rGO-Li (63.9 mAh g1), as illustrated in Figure 6b,d and Figure S4.
To support electrochemical performance, the images of the Cu-Li, rGO-Li, and rGO/C-ZIF-8 electrodes surface were observed via SEM analysis after 250 cycles in an LFP full cell, as shown in Figure 7a–c. After cycling, the surfaces of the Cu-Li and rGO-Li electrodes exhibited numerous cracks, whereas the rGO/C-ZIF-8 electrode surface remained relatively dense with fewer cracks even after 250 cycles. The presence of cracks accelerates electrolyte consumption, leading to decreased coulombic efficiency and poor cycling performance. This demonstrates that the rGO/C-ZIF-8 composite, with fewer cracks, can maintain stable cycling performance with minimal surface changes even after prolonged cycling.

4. Conclusions

We successfully synthesized rGO/C-ZIF-8 composites using a simple redox reaction and carbonization method, aimed at enhancing the stability of Li metal anodes. The lithiophilic Zn, N of C-ZIF-8, and the oxygen functional group of rGO acted as Li host sites to decrease the Li nucleation energy barrier for uniform Li deposition. The rGO/C-ZIF-8 exhibited stable Li plating/stripping performance at a current density of 1 mA cm2 for an areal capacity of 1 mAh cm2 for over 100 h. Notably, the electrode demonstrated low Li plating overpotential at high current densities (~72.6 mV at 5 mA cm2, ~123.5 mV at 10 mA cm2), highlighting its suitability for high-rate applications. Moreover, a full cell with a LiFePO4 cathode showed excellent cyclability, maintaining a capacity of 112 mAh g1 (capacity retention 89%) for 250 cycles at a 1 C-rate, and exhibiting an excellent high-rate capability of 69.1 mAh g1 at a 5 C-rate, further affirming the potential in practical applications. The design of the rGO/C-ZIF-8 composite, which integrates lithiophilic Zn and N with rGO, represents a promising approach to reduce overpotential and improve the overall performance of Li metal anodes. This strategy could significantly advance the development of dendrite-free Li metal batteries (LMBs), providing a viable path toward practical high-energy-density LMBs. Additionally, it indicates the feasibility of scaling up to LMBs while maintaining high energy density, a long cycle life, and enhanced safety.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma17174300/s1, Figure S1: Typical voltage profiles of Cu, rGO, and rGO/C-ZIF-8 during the initialization process; Figure S2: Li plating profiles of Cu, rGO, and rGO/C-ZIF-8; Figure S3: Charge/discharge profiles for different cycles of (a) LFP/Cu-Li and (b) LFP/rGO-Li; Figure S4: Charge/discharge profiles at different rates of (a) LFP/Cu-Li and (b) LFP/rGO-Li; Table S1: Nucleation energy barrier of Li on Cu, rGO, and rGO/C-ZIF-8 at various current densities with 1 mAh cm−2 areal capacity; Table S2: Failure time and plating/stripping overpotential of Li on Cu-Li, rGO-Li, and rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li at 1 mA cm−2 current densities with 1 mAh cm−2 areal capacity; Table S3: Plating/stripping overpotential of Li on Cu-Li, rGO-Li, and rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li at various current densities with 1 mAh cm−2 areal capacity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-W.J. and H.-K.K.; data curation, S.-W.J., B.I.O., E.S.C., J.-A.P. and H.-K.K.; formal analysis, S.-W.J., B.I.O., J.-A.P. and H.-K.K.; investigation, S.-W.J., B.I.O., E.S.C., J.-A.P. and H.-K.K.; methodology, S.-W.J. and H.-K.K.; supervision, H.-K.K.; validation, S.-W.J.; visualization, J.-A.P.; writing—original draft, S.-W.J.; writing—review and editing, B.I.O., E.S.C., J.-A.P. and H.-K.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. RS-2023-00277946) and the Technology Innovation Program (RS-2022-00155791) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, Korea). This work was also supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) (2021R1I1A3046581).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ye, J.; Zhang, H.; Yang, R.; Li, X.; Qi, L. Morphology-controlled synthesis of SnO2 nanotubes by using 1D silica mesostructures as sacrificial templates and their applications in lithium-ion batteries. Small 2010, 6, 296–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lou, X.W.; Yuan, C.; Archer, L.; Wang, Y.; Lee, J. Template-free synthesis of SnO2 hollow nanostructures with high lithium storage capacity. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 2325–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cheng, X.-B.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, C.-Z.; Zhang, Q. Toward safe lithium metal anode in rechargeable batteries: A review. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 10403–10473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Thirumalraj, B.; Hagos, T.T.; Huang, C.-J.; Teshager, M.A.; Cheng, J.-H.; Su, W.-N.; Hwang, B.-J. Nucleation and growth mechanism of lithium metal electroplating. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 18612–18623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. An, Y.; Fei, H.; Zeng, G.; Xu, X.; Ci, L.; Xi, B.; Xiong, S.; Feng, J.; Qian, Y. Vacuum distillation derived 3D porous current collector for stable lithium–metal batteries. Nano Energy 2018, 47, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yamaki, J.-I.; Tobishima, S.-I.; Hayashi, K.; Saito, K.; Nemoto, Y.; Arakawa, M. A consideration of the morphology of electrochemically deposited lithium in an organic electrolyte. J. Power Sources 1998, 74, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, L.; Zhou, Z.; Yan, X.; Hou, F.; Wen, L.; Luo, W.; Liang, J.; Dou, S.X. Engineering of lithium-metal anodes towards a safe and stable battery. Energy Storage Mater. 2018, 14, 22–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yasin, G.; Arif, M.; Mehtab, T.; Lu, X.; Yu, D.; Muhammad, N.; Nazir, M.T.; Song, H. Understanding and suppression strategies toward stable Li metal anode for safe lithium batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 25, 644–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, W.; Wang, J.; Ding, F.; Chen, X.; Nasybulin, E.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.-G. Lithium metal anodes for rechargeable batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 513–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cao, D.; Sun, X.; Li, Q.; Natan, A.; Xiang, P.; Zhu, H. Lithium dendrite in all-solid-state batteries: Growth mechanisms, suppression strategies, and characterizations. Matter 2020, 3, 57–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Famprikis, T.; Canepa, P.; Dawson, J.A.; Islam, M.S.; Masquelier, C. Fundamentals of inorganic solid-state electrolytes for batteries. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 1278–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, H.; Cheng, X.-B.; Huang, J.-Q.; Yuan, H.; Lu, Y.; Yan, C.; Zhu, G.-L.; Xu, R.; Zhao, C.-Z.; Hou, L.-P. Controlling dendrite growth in solid-state electrolytes. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 833–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, S.; Luo, Z.; Li, L.; Hu, J.; Zou, G.; Hou, H.; Ji, X. Recent progress on electrolyte additives for stable lithium metal anode. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 32, 306–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, G.; Xiong, X.; Xie, D.; Fu, X.; Ma, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Lin, Z.; Yang, C.; Liu, M. Suppressing dendrite growth by a functional electrolyte additive for robust Li metal anodes. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 23, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, D.; Xiong, X.; Liang, Q.; Wu, X.; Fu, H. An inorganic-rich SEI induced by LiNO3 additive for a stable lithium metal anode in carbonate electrolyte. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 9232–9235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Xie, J.; Wang, J.; Lee, H.R.; Yan, K.; Li, Y.; Shi, F.; Huang, W.; Pei, A.; Chen, G.; Subbaraman, R. Engineering stable interfaces for three-dimensional lithium metal anodes. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaat5168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fan, Y.; Liao, J.; Luo, D.; Huang, Y.; Sun, F.; Nan, J. In situ formation of a lithiophilic surface on 3D current collectors to regulate lithium nucleation and growth for dendrite-free lithium metal anodes. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 453, 139903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, G.; Lou, P.; Xu, G.-H.; Zhang, X.; Liang, J.; Liu, H.; Liu, C.; Tang, S.; Cao, Y.-C.; Cheng, S. Co3O4 nanosheet decorated nickel foams as advanced lithium host skeletons for dendrite-free lithium metal anode. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 817, 152753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, F.; Xu, R.; Hu, Z.; Ye, S.; Zeng, S.; Yao, Y.; Li, S.; Yu, Y. Regulating lithium nucleation via CNTs modifying carbon cloth film for stable Li metal anode. Small 2019, 15, 1803734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lin, D.; Liu, Y.; Liang, Z.; Lee, H.-W.; Sun, J.; Wang, H.; Yan, K.; Xie, J.; Cui, Y. Layered reduced graphene oxide with nanoscale interlayer gaps as a stable host for lithium metal anodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 626–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, S.; Xiao, S.; Li, D.; Liao, J.; Ji, F.; Liu, H.; Ci, L. Commercial carbon cloth: An emerging substrate for practical lithium metal batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 48, 172–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yan, X.; Lin, L.; Chen, Q.; Xie, Q.; Qu, B.; Wang, L.; Peng, D.L. Multifunctional roles of carbon-based hosts for Li-metal anodes: A review. Carbon Energy 2021, 3, 303–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cheng, H.; Zhang, S.; Mei, J.; Qiu, L.; Zhang, P.; Xu, X.; Tu, J.; Xie, J.; Zhao, X. Lithiated carbon cloth as a dendrite-free anode for high-performance lithium batteries. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 5773–5782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, W.; Xia, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Jin, J.; Chen, Y.; Paek, E.; Mitlin, D. Pristine or highly defective? Understanding the role of graphene structure for stable lithium metal plating. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1802918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, H.; Huang, M.; Song, J.; Sun, D.; Qiao, Y.; Zhou, X.; Ye, C.; Liu, W.; Liu, W.; Wei, Z. Effect of the defect densities of reduced graphene oxide network on the stability of lithium-metal anodes. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 27, 102276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xia, G.; Wang, C.; Jiang, P.; Lu, J.; Diao, J.; Chen, Q. Nitrogen/oxygen co-doped mesoporous carbon octahedrons for high-performance potassium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 12317–12324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tan, L.; Feng, S.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Peng, W.; Liu, T.; Yan, G.; Li, L.; Wu, F.; Wang, J. Oxygen-induced lithiophilicity of tin-based framework toward highly stable lithium metal anode. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 394, 124848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Du, Z.; Guan, W.; He, C.; Liu, Y.; Ai, W. Advances in graphene-based hosts for lithium metal anodes. Energy Storage Mater. 2024, 50, 103191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Z.; Ji, W.; Wang, T.-X.; Ding, X.; Han, B.-H.; Feng, W. Maximized lithiophilic carbonyl units in covalent organic frameworks as effective Li ion regulators for lithium metal batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 437, 135293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhu, M.; Li, B.; Li, S.; Du, Z.; Gong, Y.; Yang, S. Dendrite-free metallic lithium in lithiophilic carbonized metal–organic frameworks. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1703505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Q.; Wang, R.; Liu, Z.; Wang, X.; Han, C.; Liu, H.; Li, B. A 3D lithiophilic ZIF-8@RGO free-standing scaffold with dendrite-free behavior enabling high-performance Li metal batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 12910–12917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wei, T.; Lu, J.; Wang, M.; Sun, C.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, D.; Lan, Y.Q. MOF-derived materials enabled lithiophilic 3D hosts for lithium metal anode—A Review. Chin. J. Chem. 2023, 41, 1861–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shichalin, O.; Papynov, E.; Ivanov, N.; Balanov, M.; Dran’kov, A.; Shkuratov, A.; Zarubina, N.; Fedorets, A.; Mayorov, V.Y.; Lembikov, A. Study of adsorption and immobilization of Cs+, Sr2+, Co2+, Pb2+, La3+ ions on Na-Faujasite zeolite transformed in solid state matrices. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 332, 125662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dran’kov, A.; Shichalin, O.; Papynov, E.; Nomerovskii, A.; Mayorov, V.; Pechnikov, V.; Ivanets, A.; Buravlev, I.; Yarusova, S.; Zavjalov, A. Hydrothermal synthesis, structure and sorption performance to cesium and strontium ions of nanostructured magnetic zeolite composites. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2022, 54, 1991–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Park, K.S.; Ni, Z.; Côté, A.P.; Choi, J.Y.; Huang, R.; Uribe-Romo, F.J.; Chae, H.K.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 10186–10191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yan, K.; Lu, Z.; Lee, H.-W.; Xiong, F.; Hsu, P.-C.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Chu, S.; Cui, Y. Selective deposition and stable encapsulation of lithium through heterogeneous seeded growth. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhuang, Z.; Liu, C.; Yan, Y.; Ma, P.; Tan, D.Q. Zn–CxNy nanoparticle arrays derived from a metal–organic framework for ultralow-voltage hysteresis and stable Li metal anodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 27095–27101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. You, L.; Ju, S.; Liu, J.; Xia, G.; Guo, Z.; Yu, X. Synergistic effect of lithiophilic Zn nanoparticles and N-doping for stable Li metal anodes. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 65, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, H.-K.; Aravindan, V.; Mhamane, D.; Yoon, S.-B.; Park, S.-H.; Nazarian-Samani, M.; Han, J.T.; Park, H.S.; Roh, K.C.; Kim, K.-B. Bulk metal-derived metal oxide nanoparticles on oxidized carbon surface. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 752, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kida, K.; Okita, M.; Fujita, K.; Tanaka, S.; Miyake, Y. Formation of high crystalline ZIF-8 in an aqueous solution. CrystEngComm 2013, 15, 1794–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sun, X.; Man, J.; Liu, K.; Liu, W.; Sun, J.; Zhang, N.; Zhou, Y.; Geng, Z.; Li, S.; Sun, J. Uniform lithium deposition enabled by a carbon nanotubes framework modified with nanosized ZIF-8 particles for dendrite-free lithium metal anode. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 616, 156474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, J.; Xu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Yang, W.; Liu, J. A highly conductive porous graphene electrode prepared via in situ reduction of graphene oxide using Cu nanoparticles for the fabrication of high performance supercapacitors. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 54275–54282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Luanwuthi, S.; Krittayavathananon, A.; Srimuk, P.; Sawangphruk, M. In situ synthesis of permselective zeolitic imidazolate framework-8/graphene oxide composites: Rotating disk electrode and Langmuir adsorption isotherm. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 46617–46623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, H.; Li, C.; Wang, Y.; Sun, M.H.; Dong, W.; Li, Y.; Su, B.L. Selenium confined in ZIF-8 derived porous carbon@MWCNTs 3D networks: Tailoring reaction kinetics for high performance lithium-selenium batteries. Chem Synth 2022, 2, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, S.; Wang, A.; Li, Q.; Wu, J.; Chiou, K.; Huang, J.; Luo, J. Crumpled graphene balls stabilized dendrite-free lithium metal anodes. Joule 2018, 2, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jin, C.; Sheng, O.; Luo, J.; Yuan, H.; Fang, C.; Zhang, W.; Huang, H.; Gan, Y.; Xia, Y.; Liang, C. 3D lithium metal embedded within lithiophilic porous matrix for stable lithium metal batteries. Nano Energy 2017, 37, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mohammadi, A.; Monconduit, L.; Stievano, L.; Younesi, R. Measuring the nucleation overpotential in lithium metal batteries: Never forget the counter electrode! J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022, 169, 070509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the rGO/C-ZIF-8 composite synthesis procedure.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the rGO/C-ZIF-8 composite synthesis procedure.
Materials 17 04300 g001
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns, (b) XPS survey spectra of GO, rGO, and PrGO/ZIF-8, (ce) C 1s spectra of GO, rGO, and PrGO/ZIF-8, and (f) N 1s spectra of PrGO/ZIF-8.
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns, (b) XPS survey spectra of GO, rGO, and PrGO/ZIF-8, (ce) C 1s spectra of GO, rGO, and PrGO/ZIF-8, and (f) N 1s spectra of PrGO/ZIF-8.
Materials 17 04300 g002
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns and (b) SEM images of PrGO/ZIF-8 and rGO/C-ZIF-8.
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns and (b) SEM images of PrGO/ZIF-8 and rGO/C-ZIF-8.
Materials 17 04300 g003
Figure 4. Nucleation energy barrier of Li on Cu-Li, rGO-Li, and rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li at various current densities (0.5, 1, and 2 mA cm2) with 1 mAh cm2 areal capacity.
Figure 4. Nucleation energy barrier of Li on Cu-Li, rGO-Li, and rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li at various current densities (0.5, 1, and 2 mA cm2) with 1 mAh cm2 areal capacity.
Materials 17 04300 g004
Figure 5. (a) Cycling performance of Cu-Li, rGO-Li, and rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li at a current density of 1 mA cm2 with an areal capacity of 1 mAh cm2. (b) Rate performance of Cu-Li, rGO-Li, and rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li at current densities from 0.5 to 10 mA cm2 with an areal capacity of 1 mAh cm2.
Figure 5. (a) Cycling performance of Cu-Li, rGO-Li, and rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li at a current density of 1 mA cm2 with an areal capacity of 1 mAh cm2. (b) Rate performance of Cu-Li, rGO-Li, and rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li at current densities from 0.5 to 10 mA cm2 with an areal capacity of 1 mAh cm2.
Materials 17 04300 g005
Figure 6. (a) Cycling performance of LFP full cells with Cu, rGO, and rGO/C-ZIF-8. (b) Rate performance of LFP full cells with Cu, rGO, and rGO/C-ZIF-8. (c) Charge/discharge profiles at different cycles at 1 C of rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li. (d) Charge/discharge profiles at different rates of rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li.
Figure 6. (a) Cycling performance of LFP full cells with Cu, rGO, and rGO/C-ZIF-8. (b) Rate performance of LFP full cells with Cu, rGO, and rGO/C-ZIF-8. (c) Charge/discharge profiles at different cycles at 1 C of rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li. (d) Charge/discharge profiles at different rates of rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li.
Materials 17 04300 g006
Figure 7. SEM images of the (a) Cu-Li, (b) rGO-Li, and (c) rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li electrodes after 250 cycles in an LFP full cell.
Figure 7. SEM images of the (a) Cu-Li, (b) rGO-Li, and (c) rGO/C-ZIF-8-Li electrodes after 250 cycles in an LFP full cell.
Materials 17 04300 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeong, S.-W.; Oh, B.I.; Chang, E.S.; Park, J.-A.; Kim, H.-K. Lithiophilic Reduced Graphene Oxide/Carbonized Zeolite Imidazolate Framework-8 Composite Host for Stable Li Metal Anodes. Materials 2024, 17, 4300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17174300

AMA Style

Jeong S-W, Oh BI, Chang ES, Park J-A, Kim H-K. Lithiophilic Reduced Graphene Oxide/Carbonized Zeolite Imidazolate Framework-8 Composite Host for Stable Li Metal Anodes. Materials. 2024; 17(17):4300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17174300

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeong, Sang-Won, Byeong Il Oh, Eun Seo Chang, Jeong-Ann Park, and Hyun-Kyung Kim. 2024. "Lithiophilic Reduced Graphene Oxide/Carbonized Zeolite Imidazolate Framework-8 Composite Host for Stable Li Metal Anodes" Materials 17, no. 17: 4300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17174300

APA Style

Jeong, S.-W., Oh, B. I., Chang, E. S., Park, J.-A., & Kim, H.-K. (2024). Lithiophilic Reduced Graphene Oxide/Carbonized Zeolite Imidazolate Framework-8 Composite Host for Stable Li Metal Anodes. Materials, 17(17), 4300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17174300

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop