Next Article in Journal
Advances in Mineral Processing, Waste Recycling and Extractive Metallurgy
Next Article in Special Issue
Thermal–Mechanical and Microstructural Simulation of Rotary Friction Welding Processes by Using Finite Element Method
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Photostability of Complex Lead Halides through Modification with Antibacterial Drug Octenidine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Simulation and Experimental of Infiltration and Solidification Process for Al2O3(3D)/5083Al Interpenetrating Phase Composite for High Speed Train Prepared by Low-Pressure Infiltration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in the Experimentation and Numerical Modeling of Material Joining Processes

by
Raul D. S. G. Campilho
1,2
1
ISEP—School of Engineering, Polytechnic of Porto, R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 431, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
2
INEGI—Institute of Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Pólo FEUP, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 400, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
Materials 2024, 17(1), 130; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17010130
Submission received: 15 December 2023 / Accepted: 25 December 2023 / Published: 27 December 2023
Material joining processes are a critical factor in engineering structures since they influence such structures’ structural integrity, performance, and longevity [1]. While significant progress has been made in the improvement of diverse joining processes [2], current design limitations require further consideration and innovative solutions [3]. This Special Issue, entitled “Advances in the Experimentation and Numerical Modeling of Material Joining Processes”, published by MDPI, aims to explore the current state of these processes, identify design limitations, propose avenues for improvement, and discuss ongoing research and prospects. Both experimental and numerical simulation approaches are examined to provide a complete perspective of the field. This Special Issue addresses a wide scope of joining methods, ranging from traditional techniques such as welding and brazing to modern innovations such as friction stir welding (FSW) and laser welding. Historically, mechanical fastening and welding techniques have been indispensable in material joining. Mechanical fastening stands out as a prevalent approach in the industry [4]. Initially employed for metal joining, this method has gained acceptance for use in the production of composite materials [5]. Screws are a robust and cost-effective non-permanent solution, although they result in negative effects with regard to weight and aesthetics [6]. Permanent fastening mechanisms, such as snap-fits, are incorporated directly into components during molding, increasing durability and eliminating the risk of loosening over time [7]. Variants of traditional welding include extrusion welding and gas–metal–arc welding, which are in prevalent use [8,9]. FSW, a solid-state joining process, excels in joining difficult-to-weld materials through use of traditional methods [10]. Laser welding presents a high-energy-density approach, allowing for precise control and minimal thermal distortion [11]. Hybrid joining techniques, e.g., combining laser and arc welding, are gaining prominence [12]. Adhesive bonding has gained increasing importance in engineering, with it offering weight reduction and improved fatigue performance [13]. Associated with all joining processes, the integration of numerical modeling is crucial for a deeper understanding of complex phenomena. In fact, computational simulations help to predict strength and analyze thermal distributions, stress concentrations, and material flow during joining processes [14,15].
Current design limitations
  • Traditional screws and fasteners add weight and may pose size constraints when lightweight and compact designs are crucial, such as in the aerospace and electronics industries [16]. In some cases, mechanical fasteners may be sensitive to temperature variations, leading to thermal expansion or contraction, which can affect joint integrity [17].
  • Welding and brazing often face challenges related to heat-affected zones (HAZs), residual stresses, and microstructural alterations [18]. Despite extensive industrial application, strength and material compatibility limitations exist [19].
  • FSW has benefits such as reduced heat input and minimized distortion [20] but is limited by tool wear, process stability, and adaptability to different materials, which pose significant design challenges [21].
  • Laser welding, as a high-energy-density approach, presents a unique set of design limitations, such as optimal parameter selection to balance efficiency and thermal stress [22]. Hybrid laser welding introduces additional complexities, namely the interactions between different heat sources, equipment synchronization and coordination, and welded material compatibility with different processes [23].
  • Adhesive bonding faces challenges related to joint strength, durability, loading rate, and process optimization [24], added to the non-existing standardized adhesive joint characterization protocols. The comparability of results becomes difficult due to variations in testing methods and reporting parameters [25]. Furthermore, the absence of a standardized predictive approach presents challenges in the design process [26].
  • In the numerical modeling domain, challenges persist in accurately representing the material joining processes, due to recurring simplifying assumptions that limit the predictive capabilities [27]. Computational simulations require refinement and need to account for all associated phenomena to enhance predictive accuracy [28].
Improving existing design processes
  • In mechanical fastening, increasing durability and fatigue strength are essential for applications under repetitive loading or dynamic stress [29]. Industrially, simplifying the assembly process by designing fastening mechanisms that are user-friendly and require minimal manual effort is a crucial aspect to enhance productivity [30].
  • Welding and brazing can benefit from studies on the optimization of process parameters, including heat input and post-weld cooling rates, with the aim of mitigating challenges associated with HAZ and respective microstructural alterations, and residual stresses in the welded parts [31]. Integrating advanced materials and alloys can increase joint strength and material compatibility, leading to robust and reliable designs [32].
  • In FSW, tool wear and process stability issues are crucial for process improvement [33]. Research efforts are being made to develop wear-resistant tool materials and optimize tool geometries [34]. An improved understanding of material flow during FSW may improve control over the process, ensuring high-quality joints [35].
  • Laser welding process improvement involves balancing the process parameters to achieve optimal efficiency and minimal thermal stress [36]. Under this scope, recent advancements in laser technology and real-time monitoring systems have contributed to efficient joining [37]. Hybrid joining between laser welding and other techniques requires understanding process interactions and the exploitation of synergistic effects [38].
  • Adhesive bonding can benefit from adhesives with improved strength, durability, and tailoring at the molecular level, offering given requirements for specific applications [39]. Comprehensive design guidelines should be developed [40] together with robust methodologies for adhesive joint characterization, either experimental or numerical [13,41]. Advances in non-destructive evaluation techniques can provide real-time monitoring of joint behavior under operation [42].
  • Numerical modeling plays a fundamental role in improving design processes by replicating complex phenomena and reducing the testing requirements [43,44]. Refining computational models and removing any geometrical and material simplifying to accurately simulate material behavior, thermal distributions, and stress concentrations has led to improvements in predictive capabilities [45].
Current lines of research
  • In mechanical fastening, recent investigations have used titanium alloys or high-strength stainless steels to enhance fastener properties, such as improving strength, reducing weight, and increasing corrosion resistance [46]. Lightweight materials and composites as fasteners are an ongoing topic of research to achieve a high strength-to-weight ratio [47].
  • Traditional welding topics include advanced filler materials, gas compositions, and shielding atmospheres, with the aim of enhancing the high robustness and quality of welds [48]. Research works on innovative heat management methods, including pulsed welding and tailored energy inputs, show potential to minimize thermal distortions [49].
  • Research on FSW is focused on understanding and mitigating tool wear [50], namely through the proposal of innovative tool geometries and adaptive control strategies, which extend tool life and maintain process stability [51]. New tool materials to improve process behavior under varying process conditions are also addressed [52].
  • Laser welding investigations focus on optimizing beam characteristics, such as wavelength and focus, to increase precision and control [53]. Real-time monitoring and feedback systems are being developed to dynamically adjust the process parameters, ensuring consistent and high-quality joints [54]. The integration of robotics into hybrid laser welding systems is gaining attention for use in increasing production rates [55].
  • Adhesive bonding research is currently exploring advanced and tailored adhesive formulations with improved mechanical properties, durability, and adaptability to diverse substrates [56]. Novel surface treatments and pre-bonding techniques [57], and adhesive testing procedures under extreme conditions, such as high temperatures or corrosive environments, are other active fields of research [58].
  • Computational models are becoming increasingly sophisticated, accurately simulating the complex dynamics of material joining processes [59]. Multiphysics simulations, involving thermal, mechanical, and metallurgical aspects, are innovations in numerical modeling research [60].
Prospects
  • Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning should bring new insights through integration into numerical modeling to achieve enhanced accuracy and the optimization of the different processes [61]. AI algorithms can learn from vast experimental datasets, enabling the identification of patterns and correlations to improve predictions [62].
  • Innovative materials can bring new developments in material joining. The improvement of advanced alloys, composites, and smart materials with tailored properties is ongoing [63], potentially leading to new approaches. Self-healing materials, for example, offer the possibility for joints to self-repair and lifespan extension [64].
  • Hybrid joining methods are a promising avenue for the future. The synergistic combination of welding with adhesive bonding [65] or friction stir welding with adhesive bonding [66] presents opportunities to overcome individual method limitations.
  • Further investigations of meshless methods and the eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) are anticipated to aid in overcoming conventional FEM techniques in evaluation crack initiation and propagation [67]. These methods present alternative approaches to deliver a more precise and efficient representation of joint behavior [68,69].
  • Environmental sustainability is a critical aspect in material joining. Efforts are underway toward developing eco-friendly joining processes, which aid in reducing either energy consumption or the environmental impact [70]. Green welding technologies, such as friction stir scribe welding and cold metal transfer welding, aim to reduce the carbon footprint of such processes [71].
In conclusion, this Special Issue, “Advances in the Experimentation and Numerical Modeling of Material Joining Processes”, aims to highlight the state of the art of the most diverse material joining processes, including respective challenges and opportunities. In parallel, this editorial paper has also aided in highlighting the main limitations, suggested improvements to be made, active research lines, and prospects. It has thus been shown that, currently, significant limitations exist but that these limitations also find a response in the current topics being addressed worldwide by academicians and industrialists. Moreover, innovative works are identified that address current topics such as AI, smart materials, hybrid joining, numerical methods, and green technology, which may bring significant improvements in joining processes and help to progress the performance of structures even further.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Messler, R.W. Joining of Materials and Structures: From Pragmatic Process to Enabling Technology; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2004; pp. 1–790. [Google Scholar]
  2. Çam, G.; İpekoğlu, G. Recent developments in joining of aluminum alloys. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 91, 1851–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pramanik, A.; Basak, A.; Dong, Y.; Sarker, P.; Uddin, M.; Littlefair, G.; Dixit, A.; Chattopadhyaya, S. Joining of carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites and aluminium alloys—A review. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2017, 101, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mehmanparast, A.; Lotfian, S.; Vipin, S.P. A review of challenges and opportunities associated with bolted flange connections in the offshore wind industry. Metals 2020, 10, 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kahraman, A.D.; Kahraman, F. Mechanical fastening methods of polymer-based composites. Int. J. Adv. Nat. Sci. Eng. Res. 2023, 7, 234–239. [Google Scholar]
  6. Katsivalis, I.; Thomsen, O.T.; Feih, S.; Achintha, M. Strength evaluation and failure prediction of bolted and adhesive glass/steel joints. Glass Struct. Eng. 2018, 3, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Troughton, M.J. (Ed.) Chapter 18—Mechanical fastening. In Handbook of Plastics Joining, 2nd ed.; William Andrew Publishing: Boston, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 175–201. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tawfeek, T. Study the influence of gas metal arc welding parameters on the weld metal and heat affected zone microstructures of low carbon steel. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2017, 9, 2013–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lu, X.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, G.; Guan, Y.; Chen, L.; Gao, A. State-of-the-art of extrusion welding and proposal of a method to evaluate quantitatively welding quality during three-dimensional extrusion process. Mater. Des. 2016, 89, 737–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ahmed, M.M.; Seleman, M.M.E.-S.; Fydrych, D.; Gürel, Ç. Review on friction stir welding of dissimilar magnesium and aluminum alloys: Scientometric analysis and strategies for achieving high-quality joints. J. Magnes. Alloys, 2023, in press.
  11. Sadeghian, A.; Iqbal, N. A review on dissimilar laser welding of steel-copper, steel-aluminum, aluminum-copper, and steel-nickel for electric vehicle battery manufacturing. Opt. Laser Technol. 2022, 146, 107595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Q.; Wu, D.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, P.; Yan, H.; Sun, T.; Li, R. Progress and perspectives of joints defects of laser-arc hybrid welding: A review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2023, in press. [CrossRef]
  13. Campilho, R.D.S.G. Design of adhesive bonded joints. Processes 2023, 11, 3369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Faria, R.V.F.; Campilho, R.D.S.G.; Gonçalves, P.J.A.; Rocha, R.J.B. Advanced numerical methods for the strength prediction of hybrid adhesively bonded T-peel joints. J. Adhes 2022, 98, 154–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Leśniak, D.; Libura, W.; Leszczyńska-Madej, B.; Bogusz, M.; Madura, J.; Płonka, B.; Boczkal, S.; Jurczak, H. FEM numerical and experimental work on extrusion welding of 7021 aluminum alloy. Materials 2023, 16, 5817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Borba, N.Z.; Kötter, B.; Fiedler, B.; dos Santos, J.F.; Amancio-Filho, S. Mechanical integrity of friction-riveted joints for aircraft applications. Compos. Struct. 2020, 232, 111542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. den Otter, C.; Maljaars, J. Preload loss of stainless steel bolts in aluminium plated slip resistant connections. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020, 157, 106984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Messler, R.W., Jr. A Practical Guide to Welding Solutions: Overcoming Technical and Material-Specific Issues; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  19. Verma, R.P.; Pandey, K.; András, K.; Khargotra, R.; Singh, T. Difficulties and redressal in joining of aluminium alloys by GMA and GTA welding: A review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 23, 2576–2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Choudhary, A.K.; Jain, R. Fundamentals of friction stir welding, its application, and advancements. In Welding Technology; Davim, J.P., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2021; pp. 41–90. [Google Scholar]
  21. Saha, R.; Biswas, P. Current status and development of external energy-assisted friction stir welding processes: A review. Weld. World 2022, 66, 577–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, Y.; Xiong, M.; He, Y.; Xiong, J.; Tian, X.; Mativenga, P. Multi-objective optimization of laser welding process parameters: The trade-offs between energy consumption and welding quality. Opt. Laser Technol. 2022, 149, 107861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Suder, W.; Ganguly, S.; Williams, S.; Yudodibroto, B.Y. Penetration and mixing of filler wire in hybrid laser welding. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2021, 291, 117040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Viana, G.M.S.O.; Costa, M.; Banea, M.D.; da Silva, L.F.M. A review on the temperature and moisture degradation of adhesive joints. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. L 2017, 231, 488–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tserpes, K.; Barroso-Caro, A.; Carraro, P.A.; Beber, V.C.; Floros, I.; Gamon, W.; Kozłowski, M.; Santandrea, F.; Shahverdi, M.; Skejić, D.; et al. A review on failure theories and simulation models for adhesive joints. J. Adhes 2022, 98, 1855–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Campilho, R.D.S.G. Strength Prediction of Adhesively-Bonded Joints; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lambiase, F.; Genna, S.; Kant, R. A procedure for calibration and validation of FE modelling of laser-assisted metal to polymer direct joining. Opt. Laser Technol. 2018, 98, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. AbuShanab, W.S.; Abd Elaziz, M.; Ghandourah, E.I.; Moustafa, E.B.; Elsheikh, A.H. A new fine-tuned random vector functional link model using Hunger games search optimizer for modeling friction stir welding process of polymeric materials. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 14, 1482–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kraemer, F.; Stähler, M.; Klein, M.; Oechsner, M. Influence of lubrication systems on the fatigue strength of bolted joints. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhu, L.; Bouzid, A.-H.; Hong, J. A method to reduce the number of assembly tightening passes in bolted flange joints. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2021, 143, 121006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vajari, K.K.; Saffar, S. Investigation of gas tungsten arc welding parameters on residual stress of heat affected zone in inconel X750 super alloy welding using finite element method. Int. J. Mech. Ind. Eng. 2023, 17, 347–357. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bayock, F.N.; Kah, P.; Salminen, A.; Belinga, M.; Yang, X. Feasibility study of welding dissimilar advanced and ultra high strength steels. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2020, 59, 54–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Emamian, S.S.; Awang, M.; Yusof, F.; Sheikholeslam, M.; Mehrpouya, M. Improving the friction stir welding tool life for joining the metal matrix composites. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 106, 3217–3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Maji, P.; Karmakar, R.; Nath, R.K.; Paul, P. An overview on friction stir welding/processing tools. Mater Today Proc. 2022, 58, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, G.; Li, H.; Wang, G.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, S.; Dai, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhang, G.; Shi, Q. Effects of pin thread on the in-process material flow behavior during friction stir welding: A computational fluid dynamics study. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2018, 124, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nisar, S.; Noor, A.; Shah, A.; Siddiqui, U.; Khan, S.Z. Optimization of process parameters for laser welding of A5083 aluminium alloy. Opt. Laser Technol. 2023, 163, 109435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kim, H.; Nam, K.; Oh, S.; Ki, H. Deep-learning-based real-time monitoring of full-penetration laser keyhole welding by using the synchronized coaxial observation method. J. Manuf. Process. 2021, 68, 1018–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, C.; Gao, M.; Zeng, X. Influences of synergy effect between laser and arc on laser-arc hybrid welding of aluminum alloys. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 120, 105766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bovone, G.; Dudaryeva, O.Y.; Marco-Dufort, B.; Tibbitt, M.W. Engineering hydrogel adhesion for biomedical applications via chemical design of the junction. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 7, 4048–4076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Brunner, A.J. 1—Investigating the performance of adhesively-bonded composite joints: Standards, test protocols, and experimental design. In Fatigue and Fracture of Adhesively-Bonded Composite Joints; Vassilopoulos, A.P., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2015; pp. 3–42. [Google Scholar]
  41. Peres, L.M.C.; Arnaud, M.F.T.D.; Silva, A.F.M.V.; Campilho, R.D.S.G.; Machado, J.J.M.; Marques, E.A.S.; dos Reis, M.Q.; Da Silva, L.F.M. Geometry and adhesive optimization of single-lap adhesive joints under impact. J. Adhes 2022, 98, 677–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Broughton, W.R. Durability Performance of Adhesive Joints; 1368–6550; National Physical Laboratory: Teddington, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  43. Singh, V.P.; Patel, S.K.; Ranjan, A.; Kuriachen, B. Recent research progress in solid state friction-stir welding of aluminium–magnesium alloys: A critical review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 6217–6256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ferreira, J.A.M.; Campilho, R.D.S.G.; Cardoso, M.G.; Silva, F.J.G. Numerical simulation of adhesively-bonded T-stiffeners by cohesive zone models. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 51, 870–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. de Sousa, C.C.R.G.; Campilho, R.D.S.G.; Marques, E.A.S.; Costa, M.; da Silva, L.F.M. Overview of different strength prediction techniques for single-lap bonded joints. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. L 2017, 231, 210–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, D.; Uy, B.; Wang, J.; Song, Y. Assessment of titanium alloy bolts for structural applications. Steel Compos. Struct. 2022, 42, 553–568. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yao, C.; Qi, Z.; Chen, W. Lightweight and high-strength interference-fit composite joint reinforced by thermoplastic composite fastener. Thin-Walled Struct. 2022, 179, 109471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chaturvedi, M.; Vendan, S.A. Advanced Welding Techniques; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  49. Chludzinski, M.; Dos Santos, R.; Churiaque, C.; Fernández-Vidal, S.; Ortega-Iguña, M.; Sánchez-Amaya, J. Pulsed laser butt welding of AISI 1005 steel thin plates. Opt. Laser Technol. 2021, 134, 106583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hasieber, M.; Wenz, F.; Grätzel, M.; Lenard, J.A.; Matthes, S.; Bergmann, J.P. A systematic analysis of maximum tolerable tool wear in friction stir welding. Weld. World 2023, 67, 325–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Meng, X.; Huang, Y.; Cao, J.; Shen, J.; dos Santos, J.F. Recent progress on control strategies for inherent issues in friction stir welding. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2021, 115, 100706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Soori, M.; Asmael, M.; Solyalı, D. Recent development in friction stir welding process. SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf. 2021, 14, 63–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Meng, Y.; Fu, J.; Gong, M.; Zhang, S.; Gao, M.; Chen, H. Laser dissimilar welding of Al/Mg lap-joint with Ti interlayer through optimized 8-shaped beam oscillation. Opt. Laser Technol. 2023, 162, 109304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Aminzadeh, A.; Sattarpanah Karganroudi, S.; Meiabadi, M.S.; Mohan, D.G.; Ba, K. A survey of process monitoring using computer-aided inspection in laser-welded blanks of light metals based on the digital twins concept. Quantum Beam Sci. 2022, 6, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wu, J.; Zhang, C.; Lian, K.; Cao, H.; Li, C. Carbon emission modeling and mechanical properties of laser, arc and laser–arc hybrid welded aluminum alloy joints. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 378, 134437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gonçalves, F.A.M.M.; Santos, M.; Cernadas, T.; Alves, P.; Ferreira, P. Influence of fillers on epoxy resins properties: A review. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 15183–15212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mandolfino, C.; Cassettari, L.; Pizzorni, M.; Saccaro, S.; Lertora, E. A response surface methodology approach to improve adhesive bonding of pulsed laser treated CFRP composites. Polymers 2022, 15, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fan, Y.; Zhao, G.; Liu, Z.; Yu, J.; Ma, S.; Zhao, X.; Han, L.; Zhang, M. An experimental study on the mechanical performance of BFRP-Al adhesive joints subjected to salt solutions at elevated temperature. J. Adhes Sci. Technol. 2023, 37, 1937–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kupfer, R.; Köhler, D.; Römisch, D.; Wituschek, S.; Ewenz, L.; Kalich, J.; Weiß, D.; Sadeghian, B.; Busch, M.; Krüger, J. Clinching of aluminum materials–methods for the continuous characterization of process, microstructure and properties. J. Adv. Join. Process. 2022, 5, 100108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, Y.; Yun, Z.; Su, C.; Zhou, X.; Wu, C. Multiphase and multi-physical simulation of open keyhole plasma arc welding. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2023, 41, 102611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fernandes, P.H.E.; Silva, G.C.; Pitz, D.B.; Schnelle, M.; Koschek, K.; Nagel, C.; Beber, V.C. Data-driven, physics-based, or both: Fatigue prediction of structural adhesive joints by artificial intelligence. Appl. Mech. 2023, 4, 334–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Samaitis, V.; Yilmaz, B.; Jasiuniene, E. Adhesive bond quality classification using machine learning algorithms based on ultrasonic pulse-echo immersion data. J. Sound Vib. 2023, 546, 117457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rakesh, P.K. Joining processes of advanced materials. In Joining Processes for Dissimilar and Advanced Materials; Rakesh, P., Davim, J.P., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  64. Paladugu, S.R.M.; Sreekanth, P.R.; Sahu, S.K.; Naresh, K.; Karthick, S.A.; Venkateshwaran, N.; Ramoni, M.; Mensah, R.A.; Das, O.; Shanmugam, R. A Comprehensive review of self-healing polymer, metal, and ceramic matrix composites and their modeling aspects for aerospace applications. Materials 2022, 15, 8521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, Y.; Chai, P.; Ma, H.; Zhang, Y. Characteristics and strength of hybrid friction stir welding and adhesive bonding lap joints for AA2024-T3 aluminium alloy. J. Adhes 2022, 98, 325–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Veligotskyi, N.; Guzanová, A.; Janoško, E. Analysis of the possibilities of joining thin-walled metallic and composite materials. Mach. Technol. Mater. 2023, 17, 158–163. [Google Scholar]
  67. Gonçalves, D.C.; Sánchez-Arce, I.J.; Ramalho, L.D.C.; Campilho, R.D.S.G.; Belinha, J. Fracture propagation based on meshless method and energy release rate criterion extended to the Double Cantilever Beam adhesive joint test. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2022, 122, 103577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Resende, R.F.P.; Resende, B.F.P.; Sanchez Arce, I.J.; Ramalho, L.D.C.; Campilho, R.D.S.G.; Belinha, J. Elasto-plastic adhesive joint design approach by a radial point interpolation meshless method. J. Adhes 2022, 98, 2396–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Djebbar, S.C.; Madani, K.; El Ajrami, M.; Houari, A.; Kaddouri, N.; Mokhtari, M.; Feaugas, X.; Campilho, R.D.S.G. Substrate geometry effect on the strength of repaired plates: Combined XFEM and CZM approach. Int. J. Adhes Adhes 2022, 119, 103252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mulcahy, K.R.; Kilpatrick, A.F.; Harper, G.D.; Walton, A.; Abbott, A.P. Debondable adhesives and their use in recycling. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 36–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Narender, M.; Ajay Kumar, V.; Manoj, A. A review on latest trends in derived technologies of friction stir welding. In Intelligent Manufacturing and Energy Sustainability: Proceedings of ICIMES 2020; Reddy, A.N.R., Marla, D., Favorskaya, M.N., Satapathy, S.C., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2021; pp. 239–249. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Campilho, R.D.S.G. Advances in the Experimentation and Numerical Modeling of Material Joining Processes. Materials 2024, 17, 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17010130

AMA Style

Campilho RDSG. Advances in the Experimentation and Numerical Modeling of Material Joining Processes. Materials. 2024; 17(1):130. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17010130

Chicago/Turabian Style

Campilho, Raul D. S. G. 2024. "Advances in the Experimentation and Numerical Modeling of Material Joining Processes" Materials 17, no. 1: 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17010130

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop