Next Article in Journal
Effect of the Molecular Weight of Carboxymethyl Cellulose on the Flotation of Chlorite
Previous Article in Journal
Discussion on Static Resistance of Granite under Penetration
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 9
10.3390/ma16093355
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Mud Content on the Setting Time and Mechanical Properties of Alkali-Activated Slag Mortar

by
Shuaijun Li
1,2,
Deyong Chen
3,
Zhirong Jia
1,*,
Yilin Li
2,
Peiqing Li
2 and
Bin Yu
2
1
School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
2
School of Transportation and Vehicle Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
3
Shandong Jiuqiang Group Co., Ltd., Zibo 255000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(9), 3355; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093355
Submission received: 28 March 2023 / Revised: 23 April 2023 / Accepted: 23 April 2023 / Published: 25 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Green Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
High mud content in the sand has a negative impact on cement mortar but there is little research on Alkali-activated slag (AAS) mortar. In order to explore the impacts of mud content in the sand on the performance of AAS mortar, this paper used sand that contains silt, clay, and a mixture of silt and clay; tested the setting time of AAS with different mud contents of 0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10%; and measured the unconfined compressive strength and beam flexural strength of 3 d, 7 d, and 28 d AAS mortar specimens. The microstructure of AAS mortar with different kinds of mud was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), the elemental composition of the hydration product was tested by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and the AAS interaction mechanism with different kinds of mud was analyzed. The main conclusions are: the higher the mud content in the sand, the shorter the initial setting time and the longer the final setting time of AAS, mainly because the mud in the sand affects the hydration process; mud content above 4% causes a rapid decrease in the compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar, mainly because the mud affects the hydration process and hinders the bonding of the hydration product with the sand. When there is no mud in the sand, the main hydration product of AAS is dense calcium-alumina-silicate-hydrate (C-A-S-H) gel. When the sand contains silt, the hydration product of AAS is loose C-A-S-H gel. When the sand contains clay, the hydration products of AAS contain C-A-S-H gel and a small amount of sodium-aluminum-silicate-hydrate (N-A-S-H), and needle-like crystals. Loose gel and crystals have a negative effect on the AAS mortar strength.

1. Introduction

Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) is the most widely used construction material because of its low cost, ease of pouring, good mechanical properties, durability, fire resistance, and wide availability [1,2]. However, the production process of cement emits large amounts of greenhouse gases and consumes large amounts of energy, limiting the sustainable development of concrete materials, and the climate crisis and environmental degradation are long-term challenges for humanity [3,4,5]. Alkali-activated slag (AAS) materials are a promising class of environmentally friendly cementitious materials, which are produced by the chemical reaction of slag with sodium silicate, sodium hydroxide, or another alkaline activator [6]. It has a high hardening rate, high early strength, corrosion and temperature resistance, and low production energy consumption [7,8,9,10,11]. Compared to OPC, AAS can significantly reduce the environmental impact of concrete products, emitting fewer greenhouse gases and consuming less energy and water due to the reuse of by-products from the steel industry [12]. Therefore, AAS is a more environmentally friendly alternative to OPC and has great potential [13,14,15].
Mud less than 75 μm is usually present on aggregate, which affects the performance of mortar and concrete [16,17]. They can prevent the cohesion between cementitious materials from forming weak interfacial layers, and they clump together to form weak areas; thus, they may have harmful effects on the properties of hardened concrete [17,18,19,20,21]. In addition, most mud, especially clay, with its large surface area and loose structure, has a great affinity for water and can also assimilate it into its microstructure, reducing concrete compatibility and increasing water consumption [22,23]. Hence, the mud attached to the aggregate has a non-negligible effect on the compatibility, mechanical properties, and durability of concrete [24,25,26,27,28], causing deterioration in the strength and freeze-thaw durability of concrete [17]. Mud content in sand adversely affects the strength of concrete [29]. Under normal conditions, the concrete slump decreases with the increase in mud content of aggregates [17,28,30,31], which will cause difficulties in the field construction of concrete. In addition, the variation in the properties of mortar and concrete depends on the chemical composition and mineral composition of the mud in the sand [16,32]. The sand–cement mixture with mud cannot be considered a simple mixture but a system in which the mud is combined with the hydrated cement through a secondary reaction. The exchange in cations and flocculation effects occur and the mud is still in a stable state when the mixture is in a freshly mixed state [31,32,33,34]. During the hardening of the cement mixture, the cement undergoes a hydration reaction to produce calcium silicate hydrate, calcium hydroxide, and hydrated aluminate, and the soluble alkali released during the hydration of calcium hydroxide and cement makes the pore solution strongly alkaline, triggering the erosion of the mud, leading to the decomposition of amorphous alumina and silica, which then combine with the calcium ions produced by the hydration reaction of the cement to produce secondary cementitious materials. This destroys the cement hydration products and reduces the mechanical properties of concrete [28,35,36,37,38,39,40].
Researchers have done a lot of work on the effect of mud content in the sand on cement and concrete but there is a lack of research on the influence of mud content on AAS mortar, and there are still many questions that need to be answered:
(1)
Does the mud affect the setting time of AAS, and is there the same effect for different mud contents and different kinds of mud;
(2)
Does the mud in the sand affect the compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar, and is there the same effect for different mud contents and different kinds of mud;
(3)
Is the threshold mud content of sand the same for AAS materials as the threshold mud content stipulated by the specification associated with the cement mixture?
In order to solve the above problems, this paper investigates the effects of silt, clay, and mixed mud at different contents on the setting time and mechanical properties of AAS mortar. SEM-EDS was used to observe the microstructure and hydration products of AAS mortar from different mud contents and to explain the reaction mechanism.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The slag was produced by Fuheng Mineral Products Trade Co., Ltd., Lingshou City, Hebei Province, China. The chemical composition analyzed by XRF is shown in Table 1.
The alkaline activator used was sodium silicate nine-hydrate (Na2SiO3-9H2O), analytically pure, white granules, supplied by Tianjin Dengfeng Chemical Plant (Tianjin, China).
The silt was taken from Gaoqing District, Zibo, Shandong Province, and the clay was taken from Zhangdian District, Zibo, Shandong Province, and filtered through a 75 μm sieve to remove the coarse particles. The chemical composition analyzed by XRF (BRUKER AXS GMBH, Beijing, China) is shown in Table 2. The particle size distribution, measured by Mastersizer 3000 Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analyzer (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK), is shown in Figure 1. The sand is ISO 679 standard sand (GSB08-1337) [41].

2.2. Testing Design

2.2.1. Testing Grouping

To investigate the effect of mud content on the performance of AAS mortar, six different percentages of mud content—0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10%—and three different types of mud—silt, clay, and mixed mud (silt and clay content were 1:1)—were used in this experiment. Activator percentage was determined to be 6% according to the Technical standard for application of alkali-activated slag concrete (JGJ/T 439-2018) [42]. The percentage of Na2O is 3%, accordingly, the modulus of sodium silicate is one. The proportions of the mixtures are summarized in Table 3. The dose of the activator is added as a percentage of precursor mass; mud content is added as a percentage of sand mass.

2.2.2. Water–Binder Ratio

The best water consumption of mortar test was determined under the Testing Methods of Cement and Concrete for Highway Engineering (JTG 3420-2020) for standard consistency test, and the water–binder ratio of mortar test was fixed to 0.5 following the specification [43].

2.2.3. Sample Maintaining

The maintenance of AAS mortar specimens followed the specification [43].

2.3. Test Methods

2.3.1. Setting Time

According to the specification [43], after the standard consistency test, determine the water consumption, and pre-dissolve the solid activator in water in advance. Put the slag and solution in a mixing pot, stir slowly for 120 s, stop for 15 s, then quickly for 120 s. Used the Vicat apparatus to measure the setting time. When slag and activator are added into the water, it is the beginning of the AAS setting time; when the test needle is sunk to 4 mm ± 1 mm away from the bottom plate, it is the end of the initial setting time of AAS; when the ring attachment cannot leave traces on the specimen, it is the end of the final setting time of AAS. When approaching the initial setting time, it should be measured every 5 min (or less); when nearing the final setting time, it should be measured every 15 min (or less). It should be measured again immediately when reaching the initial or final setting, and the two conclusions are the same to determine the arrival of the initial or final setting time.

2.3.2. AAS Mortar Strength

According to the specification [43] for the preparation of the AAS mortar specimen, the fresh mortar mixture is poured into the 40 mm × 40 mm × 160 mm triplex test mold two times, and each time it is poured, vibrated 60 times. Then, it is maintained under standard environmental conditions (temperature 20 °C ± 1 °C, relative humidity > 90%) for 24 h. After removal from the mold, the specimens are placed into the sink and maintained under standard conditions until reaching the age (3 d, 7 d, 28 d) for testing. The compressive and flexural strength tests of the cementitious sand are measured using cementitious sand compressive and flexural apparatus. The average values of the three specimens are determined by the flexural and compressive strength of the AAS mortar for the corresponding curing age.

2.3.3. Micro-Analysis

Crushed specimens were kept in anhydrous ethanol for 7 d to stop the hydration reaction after the flexural and compressive strength tests [44,45]. Then, the specimens were removed from the anhydrous ethanol and dried to an absolutely dry state. The morphology and elemental composition of the hydration products were determined using SEM and EDS to determine the hydration products of the AAS mortar and the reaction mechanism. The QUANTAFEG 250 field emission scanning electron microscope was manufactured by FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA.

3. Test Results and Analysis

The experimental results of the different-parameter samples are shown in Table 4.

3.1. Setting Time

Figure 2 shows the variation of AAS setting time for the different mud and content. The initial setting time of the AAS gelling material gradually decreases with the rise in the silt content, from 46 min to 28 min, which is 39% shorter. In contrast, the final setting time gradually increases with the rise in the silt content, from 150 min to 225 min, which is 50% longer.
The addition of clay and mixed mud shows the same trend as the addition of silt but the change in setting time is more significant because the surface area of clay is larger, which made its adsorption stronger: the initial setting time of AAS gelling material reduces from 46 min to 17 min, shortened by 63%, and the final setting time extends from 150 min to 244 min, extended by 62.6%.
The initial setting time of AAS with the addition of mixed mud reduces from 46 min to 23 min, shortened by 50%, and the final setting time extends from 150 min to 238 min, increased by 58.6%.
The above phenomenon is mainly due to the water absorption of the mud. With the increase in the mud content, the water absorption of the mud increases, which indirectly reduces the water-binder ratio (w/b) in the early stage. The setting time of AAS depends on the OH− and Ca2+ ion concentration. Lower w/b increases the OH− ion concentration. Consequently, the rate of breaking the Ca-O, Si-O-Si, and Al-O-Al bonds is sped up, which leads to the increase in Ca2+ ion concentration and accelerates the formation of hydration products and the arrival of the initial setting state [20,46,47]. However, the water absorption of mud also delays the hydration process, especially with high kaolinite content [48,49,50,51], leading to a longer final setting time. As for the effect of the particle sizes of mud on setting time, the capability of liquid absorption of clay with a smaller particle size is stronger than that of silt with a larger particle size [46]. Therefore, the initial setting time of AAS containing clay is shorter, and the final setting time is longer.

3.2. Mechanical Property

Figure 3 shows that the flexural and compressive strengths of all specimens increased with curing age. Figure 3a shows the effect of different silt content on the compressive strength of AAS mortar at 3 d, 7 d, and 28 d. Figure 3a shows that the compressive strength of AAS mortar has no significant effect when the silt content is 2%, compared with the specimen without silt (0% mud content); when the silt content is 4%, the 3 d, 7 d, and 28 d compressive strength of AAS mortar decreases slightly, with a decline of 2.8~7.2%; when the silt content increases to 6~10%, the compressive strength of AAS mortar decreases rapidly at 3 d, 7 d, and 28 d, reaching a minimum of 10%, with a decrease of 25.9~30.4%.
Figure 3b shows the effect of different silt content on the flexural strength at 3 d, 7 d, and 28 d. Similar to the compressive strength, the silt has a harmful effect on the flexural strength of the AAS mortar. Compressive strength gradually decreases with rising silt content in the sand during all the curing ages; decreases by 6.3~7.7% when the silt content increases from 0% to 4%; and the flexural strength decreases by 17.3~17.6% (27.5~33.3%) when the silt content increases to 6% (10%). The greater content of silt, the more significant the adverse effect on the mechanical properties of AAS mortar.
Figure 4a shows the effect of different clay content on the compressive strength of AAS mortar at 3 d, 7 d, and 28 d. The compressive strength of AAS mortar at different curing ages shows a trend of slight increase and then decrease with the rise of clay content, and its strength reaches the peak at about 2% of clay content, and the peak does not change with the curing age, and drops to the lowest value at 10% of clay content. The compressive strength of AAS mortar increases by 1.1~4.8% when the clay content is 2%; the strength decreases by 2.8~3% when the content reaches 4%; the strength decreases by 20~21.4% when the content is 6%; the strength decreases by 27.3~29.1% when the content is 8%; and the strength decreases by 35.3~35.7% when the content is 10%.
Figure 4b shows the effect of different clay content on the flexural strength of AAS mortar at 3 d, 7 d, and 28 d. Similar to the compressive strength, a small amount of clay has no effect on the flexural strength of the mortar but when the clay content is above 4%, clay has a harmful impact on the flexural strength. Figure 4b shows that the flexural strength increases from 4.5 to 12.3% when the clay content increases from 0 to 2% at all curing ages, and the flexural strength decreases by 20.6~23.5% (35.2~39.7%) when the clay content increases to 6% (10%).
Figure 5 shows the effect of different mixed mud content on the compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar at 3 d, 7 d, and 28 d. The compressive and flexural strengths increase by 0.4~0.5% and 1.2~2.2%, respectively, when the mixed mud content is 2%; the compressive and flexural strengths decrease by 3.4~7.6% and 6.3~9.9%, respectively, when the content is 4%; the compressive and flexural strengths reduce by 17.7~22% (28.4~34.4%) and 14.3~22.2% (34.9~37.4%), respectively when the content reaches 6% (10%).
Figure 6 visually shows the changes in the compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar resulting from the amounts of clay, silt, and mixed mud. The clay has a more significant effect on the compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar compared to the silt and mixed mud. When the mud content is less than 4%, the effect of mud is not significant on the compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar; when the content is more than 4%, mud leads to a rapid decrease in the compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar.
Overall, the mud in the sand has a non-negligible effect on the compressive strength and flexural strength of AAS mortar. When the silt and clay content is less than 4%, the mud has almost no effect on the compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar, which is because the mud fills the pores of the sand skeleton [52] and reduces the negative effect caused by the addition of mud. When the mud content exceeds 4%, the compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar decrease rapidly, mainly for the following reasons: (1) mud absorbs water from the fresh mortar and this affects the hydration process [49,50,51]; (2) part of the mud wraps around the sand particles, which interferes with the bonding of sand with cementitious materials [52]; (3) as the mud content increases, this results in a decrease in overall strength because the overall strength of the specimen is shared by hydration products, sand, and mud, while the strength of mud is lower than that of hydration products and sand [53,54]; and (4) the active components in clay minerals will also be activated by alkaline and generate additional cementitious products [55]. Clay is finer than silt, and with more active components, it has different effects on the compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar [56].

3.3. Mechanism Analysis

Figure 7 shows the microstructure and EDS diagrams of AAS hydration products under different conditions. Figure 7a–c represents the microstructure of 28 d AAS mortar with 0% mud content, 6% silt content, and 6% clay content, respectively. Figure 7d–f represents the EDS diagrams of the corresponding points in a–c, respectively. It can be observed in Figure 7a that when the AAS mortar does not contain mud, the alkali slag product is structurally dense, with more gel and better integrity. The EDS results in Figure 7d clearly show the elemental composition of the corresponding points of the A0 specimen, and there are a large number of alkali metal ions in the gel products, among which Ca2+ and Al3+ are dominant, almost without Na+, mainly because compared with Na+, the Ca2+, and Al3+ are more attracted to negative charges and will preferentially combine with anions [57,58,59,60], which makes the main reaction products of the slag C-S-H and C-A-S-H gels, they are the primary source of the strength of the AAS mortar.
It can be observed in Figure 7a,b that the specimen of A0 has a better degree of hydration reaction. In contrast, S6 has a slower hydration reaction process. It produces a loose flocculent gel, which is the reason for the decrease in compressive and flexural strengths of the AAS mortar-containing silt. The EDS results in Figure 7e clearly show the elemental composition of the corresponding points of the S6 specimen. Compared to Figure 7d, Al elements cannot be found, which is mainly because the silt slows down the hydration process, resulting in the reduction of C-A-S-H gels, forming loose flocculent gels. The finding is similar to the phenomenon of alkali-activated fly ash with silt studied by Sheng et al. [61].
Figure 7c shows that a large amount of square or needle-like products appear in the surface layer, which is similar to the phenomenon previously shown by Karozou et al. using alkali activators to activate clay [62]. It can be seen by EDS analysis in Figure 7f that there is a significant increase in silicon elements in the square or needle-like products and a small amount of Na+. The main reason is that the slag material with high calcium will dissociate a large number of free Ca2+ during the alkaline being activated, and the clay raw material component contains a large amount of silicon and aluminum elements, which will produce a large amount of [AlO4]5− and [SiO4]4− when activated and polymerize with alkali metal Ca2+ to generate C-(A)-S-H gel. Due to the decrease in the calcium-silica ratio, some [AlO4]5− and [SiO4]4− reacted with Na+ to form a small amount of N-A-S-H gel [63,64]. That is similar to the results of Yonghua et al. using slag and fly ash to solidify clay [53]. The N-A-S-H gel exhibits characteristics common to both amorphous and pseudo-zeolitic or proto-zeolitic structures [65,66], destroying the original cemented dense gel structure, and reducing the AAS mortar strength.

4. Conclusions

Based on this study on the effect of different contents of silt, clay, and a mixture of silt and clay on the setting time, compressive strength, and flexural strength of AAS mortar, the major conclusions are drawn as follows:
(1)
Mud in the sand significantly affects the setting time of AAS. As the mud absorbs water, the alkali concentration increases, which speeds up the reaction of AAS and shortens the initial setting time of AAS but the mud slows down the hydration process and makes the final setting time longer. With the increase in mud content, this phenomenon also becomes more and more significant. Clay has a more significant influence than silt;
(2)
With the increase in the silt content in the sand, the compressive strength and flexural strength of AAS mortar both decrease. When the silt content is less than 4%, there is no significant effect of silt on the mechanical properties of AAS mortar. When the silt content exceeds 4%, the silt affects the hydration process of AAS that leads to the weakening of the bond between the gel and the sand, producing loose flocculent gel and reducing the mechanical properties of AAS mortar significantly;
(3)
The clay in the sand has almost no negative impact on the compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar when the clay content is less than 4%; the strength of AAS mortar decreases rapidly when the content exceeds 4%. The clay slows down the hydration process of AAS, hinders the bonding between the gel and sand, and the clay minerals destroy the original dense gel structure. Microscopic analysis shows that a small amount of N-A-S-H gel and partially ordered crystals are produced, which destroys the dense gel structure;
(4)
The recommended threshold mud content of sand for AAS mortar is 4% according to the setting time and strength. However, other properties of AAS mortar with mud should be studied further in order to calibrate the recommended thresholds.

Author Contributions

S.L.: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing; D.C.: methodology, funding acquisition, project administration, writing—review and editing; Z.J.: conceptualization, methodology, funding acquisition, project administration, writing—review and editing; Y.L.: writing—review and editing; P.L.: writing—review and editing; B.Y.: supervision, data curation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2022ME133), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51908342).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to the need for confidentiality.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bakharev, T.; Sanjayan, J.G.; Cheng, Y. Resistance of alkali-activated slag concrete to carbonation. Cem. Concr. Res. 2001, 31, 1277–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Imbabi, M.S.; Carrigan, C.; McKenna, S. Trends and developments in green cement and concrete technology. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 2012, 1, 194–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pierrehumbert, R. There is no Plan B for dealing with the climate crisis. Bull. At. Sci. 2019, 75, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Benhelal, E.; Zahedi, G.; Shamsaei, E.; Bahadori, A. Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 51, 142–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wojtacha-Rychter, K.; Smoliński, A. Multi-Case Study on Environmental and Economic Benefits through Co-Burning Refuse-Derived Fuels and Sewage Sludge in Cement Industry. Materials 2022, 15, 4176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhu, J.; Zheng, W.Z. Effectiveness of alkali-activated slag cementitious material as adhesive for structural reinforcement. In Applied Mechanics and Materials; Trans Tech Publications Ltd.: Stafa-Zurich, Switzerland, 2012; Volume 193, pp. 418–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. John, S.K.; Nadir, Y.; Girija, K. Effect of source materials, additives on the mechanical properties and durability of fly ash and fly ash-slag geopolymer mortar: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 280, 122443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xie, J.; Zhao, J.; Wang, J.; Fang, C.; Yuan, B.; Wu, Y. Impact behaviour of fly ash and slag-based geopolymeric concrete: The effects of recycled aggregate content, water-binder ratio and curing age. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 331, 127359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Amran, Y.M.; Alyousef, R.; Alabduljabbar, H.; El-Zeadani, M. Clean production and properties of geopolymer concrete; A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 251, 119679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Singh, B.; Ishwarya, G.; Gupta, M.; Bhattacharyya, S.K. Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 85, 78–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Amran, M.; Huang, S.; Debbarma, S.; Rashid, R.S. Fire resistance of geopolymer concrete: A critical review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 324, 126722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiang, M.; Chen, X.; Rajabipour, F.; Hendrickson, C.T. Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional, glass powder, and alkali-activated slag concrete and mortar. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2014, 20, 4014020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alsalman, A.; Assi, L.N.; Kareem, R.S.; Carter, K.; Ziehl, P. Energy and CO2 emission assessments of alkali-activated concrete and Ordinary Portland Cement concrete: A comparative analysis of different grades of concrete. Clean. Environ. Syst. 2021, 3, 100047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Thwe, E.; Khatiwada, D.; Gasparatos, A. Life cycle assessment of a cement plant in Naypyitaw, Myanmar. Clean. Environ. Syst. 2021, 2, 100007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Z.; Delsaute, B.; Lu, T.; Kostiuchenko, A.; Staquet, S.; Ye, G. A comparative study on the mechanical properties, autogenous shrinkage and cracking proneness of alkali-activated concrete and ordinary Portland cement concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 292, 123418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Norvell, J.K.; Stewart, J.G.; Juenger, M.C.; Fowler, D.W. Influence of clays and clay-sized particles on concrete performance. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2007, 19, 1053–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Muñoz, J.F.; Gullerud, K.J.; Cramer, S.M.; Tejedor, M.I.; Anderson, M.A. Effects of coarse aggregate coatings on concrete performance. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2010, 22, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ohemeng, E.A.; Ekolu, S.O. A review on the reactivation of hardened cement paste and treatment of recycled aggregates. Mag. Concr. Res. 2020, 72, 526–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fernandes, V.A.; Purnell, P.; Still, G.T.; Thomas, T.H. The effect of clay content in sands used for cementitious materials in developing countries. Cem. Concr. Res. 2007, 37, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nehdi, M.L. Clay in cement-based materials: Critical overview of state-of-the-art. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 51, 372–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Saberi Varzaneh, A.; Naderi, M. Experimental and Finite Element Study to Determine the Mechanical Properties and Bond Between Repair Mortars and Concrete Substrates. J. Appl. Comput. Mech. 2022, 8, 493–509. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ferreiro, S.; Herfort, D.; Damtoft, J.S. Effect of raw clay type, fineness, water-to-cement ratio and fly ash addition on workability and strength performance of calcined clay–limestone Portland cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 2017, 101, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ting, L.; Qiang, W.; Shiyu, Z. Effects of ultra-fine ground granulated blast-furnace slag on initial setting time, fluidity and rheological properties of cement pastes. Powder Technol. 2019, 345, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Herzog, A.; Mitchell, J.K. Reactions accompanying stabilization of clay with cement. Highw. Res. Rec. 1963. Available online: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/hrr/1963/36/36-008.pdf (accessed on 24 March 2023).
  25. Bouguerra, A.; Ledhem, A.; De Barquin, F.; Dheilly, R.M.; Quéneudec, M. Effect of microstructure on the mechanical and thermal properties of lightweight concrete prepared from clay, cement, and wood aggregates. Cem. Concr. Res. 1998, 28, 1179–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhao, Z.; Wang, S.; Ren, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C. Fatigue characteristics and prediction of cement-stabilized cold recycled mixture with road-milling materials considering recycled aggregate composition. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 301, 124122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Attou, F.; Bruand, A.; Le Bissonnais, Y. Effect of clay content and silt—Clay fabric on stability of artificial aggregates. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 1998, 49, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tan, H.; Gu, B.; Guo, Y.; Ma, B.; Huang, J.; Ren, J.; Zou, F.; Guo, Y. Improvement in compatibility of polycarboxylate superplasticizer with poor-quality aggregate containing montmorillonite by incorporating polymeric ferric sulfate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 162, 566–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Deshmukh, S.R.; Patil, S.N.; Maske, M.M. Study of concrete mixes (M20 and M30) with optimum cement consumption using 100% crushed sand and effect of silt content in the crushed sand on strength and workability of the concrete. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 59, 867–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ge, Z.; Wang, Y.; Sun, R.; Wu, X.; Guan, Y. Influence of ground waste clay brick on properties of fresh and hardened concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 98, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou, Y.; Du, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Liang, S. An experimental study on mechanical, shrinkage and creep properties of early-age concrete affected by clay content on coarse aggregate. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Habert, G.; Choupay, N.; Escadeillas, G.; Guillaume, D.; Montel, J.M. Clay content of argillites: Influence on cement based mortars. Appl. Clay Sci. 2009, 43, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sharma, M.; Bishnoi, S.; Martirena, F.; Scrivener, K. Limestone calcined clay cement and concrete: A state-of-the-art review. Cem. Concr. Res. 2021, 149, 106564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Z.; Li, M.; Shen, L.; Wang, J. Incorporating clay as a natural and enviro-friendly partial replacement for cement to reduce carbon emissions in peat stabilisation: An experimental investigation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 353, 128901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cardoso, T.C.; de Matos, P.R.; Py, L.; Longhi, M.; Cascudo, O.; Kirchheim, A.P. Ternary cements produced with non-calcined clay, limestone, and Portland clinker. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 45, 103437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nguyen, Q.D.; Afroz, S.; Zhang, Y.; Kim, T.; Li, W.; Castel, A. Autogenous and total shrinkage of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) concretes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 314, 125720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Msinjili, N.S.; Vogler, N.; Sturm, P.; Neubert, M.; Schröder, H.; Kühne, H.; Hünger, K.; Gluth, G.J. Calcined brick clays and mixed clays as supplementary cementitious materials: Effects on the performance of blended cement mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 266, 120990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shafizadeh, A.; Gimmi, T.; Van Loon, L.R.; Kaestner, A.P.; Mäder, U.K.; Churakov, S.V. Time-resolved porosity changes at cement-clay interfaces derived from neutron imaging. Cem. Concr. Res. 2020, 127, 105924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kirthika, S.K.; Surya, M.; Singh, S.K. Effect of clay in alternative fine aggregates on performance of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 228, 116811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tregger, N.A.; Pakula, M.E.; Shah, S.P. Influence of clays on the rheology of cement pastes. Cem. Concr. Res. 2010, 40, 384–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ministry of General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. Standard Sand for Cement Strength Testing; AQSIQ: Beijing, China, 2014.
  42. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Technical Standard for Application of Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete; Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2018.
  43. Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Testing Methods of Cement and Concrete for Highway Engineering; Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2020.
  44. Ren, J.; Zhao, Z.; Xu, Y.; Wang, S.; Chen, H.; Huang, J.; Xue, B.; Wang, J.; Chen, J.; Yang, C. High-fluidization, early strength cement grouting material enhanced by Nano-SiO2: Formula and mechanisms. Materials 2021, 14, 6144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhao, Z.; Chen, J.; Wang, J.; Zhuang, S.; Chen, H.; Zhao, H.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L.; Li, M.; Li, G. Effect Mechanisms of Toner and Nano-SiO2 on Early Strength of Cement Grouting Materials for Repair of Reinforced Concrete. Buildings 2022, 12, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tian, L.; Chen, X.; Liu, X.; Li, H.; Ge, Y. Mechanisms of recycled fine brick aggregate in autogenous shrinkage mitigation, mechanical properties enhancement and microstructure improvement of alkali-activated slag-fly ash mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 373, 130755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Perná, I.; Hanzlíček, T. The setting time of a clay-slag geopolymer matrix: The influence of blast-furnace-slag addition and the mixing method. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 1150–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Louati, S.; Baklouti, S.; Samet, B. Acid based geopolymerization kinetics: Effect of clay particle size. Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 132, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Manić, V.; Miljković, L.; Djurić-Stanojević, B. The 1HT1 study of the influence of clay addition on Portland cement hydration. Appl. Magn. Reson. 1997, 13, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vipulanandan, C.; Sunder, S. Effects of meta-kaolin clay on the working and strength properties of cement grouts. In Grouting and Deep Mixing 2012; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2012; pp. 1739–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhao, H.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, J.; Hu, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, K. Effect of clay content on shrinkage of cementitious materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 322, 125959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ayodele, F.O.; Ayeni, I.S. Analysis of influence of silt/clay impurities present in fine aggregates on the compressive strength of concrete. Int. J. Eng. Res. Sci. Technol. 2015, 15, 6. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhao, Y.; Kong, L.; Xu, R.; Liu, J.; Sang, S. Strength behaviors of hydrate-bearing clayey-silty sediments with multiple factors. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2022, 219, 111035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, D.; Wang, Z.; Liang, D.; Wu, X. Effect of clay content on the mechanical properties of hydrate-bearing sediments during hydrate production via depressurization. Energies 2019, 12, 2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Su, Y.; Luo, B.; Luo, Z.; Xu, F.; Huang, H.; Long, Z.; Shen, C. Mechanical characteristics and solidification mechanism of slag/fly ash-based geopolymer and cement solidified organic clay: A comparative study. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 71, 106459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rivera, J.F.; de Gutiérrez, R.M.; Ramirez-Benavides, S.; Orobio, A. Compressed and stabilized soil blocks with fly ash-based alkali-activated cements. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 264, 120285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lecomte, I.; Henrist, C.; Liégeois, M.; Maseri, F.; Rulmont, A.; Cloots, R. (Micro)-structural comparison between geopolymers, alkali-activated slag cement and Portland cement. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 26, 3789–3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yip, C.K.; Lukey, G.C.; Van Deventer, J.S. The coexistence of geopolymeric gel and calcium silicate hydrate at the early stage of alkaline activation. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 1688–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yang, J.; Li, D.; Fang, Y. Effect of synthetic CaO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O on the early-stage performance of alkali-activated slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 167, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Provis, J.L.; Bernal, S.A. Geopolymers and related alkali-activated materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2014, 44, 299–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jiang, S.; Xu, J.; Song, Y.; Xu, Y. Alkali-activated fly ash foam concrete with Yellow River silt: Physico-mechanical and structural properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 373, 130879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Karozou, A.; Konopisi, S.; Paulidou, E.; Stefanidou, M. Alkali activated clay mortars with different activators. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 212, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. García-Lodeiro, I.; Palomo, A.; Fernández-Jiménez, A.; Macphee, D.E. Compatibility studies between NASH and CASH gels. Study in the ternary diagram Na2O–CaO–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Walkley, B.; San Nicolas, R.; Sani, M.; Rees, G.J.; Hanna, J.V.; van Deventer, J.S.; Provis, J.L. Phase evolution of C-(N)-ASH/NASH gel blends investigated via alkali-activation of synthetic calcium aluminosilicate precursors. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 89, 120–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Provis, J.L.; Van Deventer, J. Geopolymerisation kinetics. 2. Reaction kinetic modelling. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62, 2318–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Khalifa, A.Z.; Cizer, Ö.; Pontikes, Y.; Heath, A.; Patureau, P.; Bernal, S.A.; Marsh, A.T. Advances in alkali-activation of clay minerals. Cem. Concr. Res. 2020, 132, 106050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 16 03355 g001 550
Figure 1. Particle size distribution of silt and clay.
Figure 1. Particle size distribution of silt and clay.
Materials 16 03355 g001
Materials 16 03355 g002 550
Figure 2. Setting time of AAS with different mud content: (a) Initial setting time; (b) Final setting time.
Figure 2. Setting time of AAS with different mud content: (a) Initial setting time; (b) Final setting time.
Materials 16 03355 g002
Materials 16 03355 g003 550
Figure 3. Compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar with different silt content: (a) Compressive strength; (b) Flexural strength.
Figure 3. Compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar with different silt content: (a) Compressive strength; (b) Flexural strength.
Materials 16 03355 g003
Materials 16 03355 g004 550
Figure 4. Compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar with different clay content: (a) Compressive strength; (b) Flexural strength.
Figure 4. Compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar with different clay content: (a) Compressive strength; (b) Flexural strength.
Materials 16 03355 g004
Materials 16 03355 g005 550
Figure 5. Compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar with different mixed mud content: (a) Compressive strength; (b) Flexural strength.
Figure 5. Compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar with different mixed mud content: (a) Compressive strength; (b) Flexural strength.
Materials 16 03355 g005
Materials 16 03355 g006 550
Figure 6. Compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar with different mud content: (a) Compressive strength; (b) Flexural strength.
Figure 6. Compressive and flexural strengths of AAS mortar with different mud content: (a) Compressive strength; (b) Flexural strength.
Materials 16 03355 g006
Materials 16 03355 g007 550
Figure 7. SEM and EDS diagrams of AAS mortar cured 28 d: (a) A0; (b) S6; (c) C6; (d) EDS image of A0; (e) EDS image of S6; (f) EDS image of S6.
Figure 7. SEM and EDS diagrams of AAS mortar cured 28 d: (a) A0; (b) S6; (c) C6; (d) EDS image of A0; (e) EDS image of S6; (f) EDS image of S6.
Materials 16 03355 g007
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition of slag.
Table 1. Chemical composition of slag.
OxideCaOAl2O3SiO2MgOFe2O3TiO2SO3MnONa2O
Mass (wt.%)42.614.227.88.090.3781.22.460.4010.55
Table
Table 2. Chemical composition of clay and silt.
Table 2. Chemical composition of clay and silt.
Chemical CompositionSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3K2ONa2OMgOSO3CaOTiO2MnOP2O5LOI
Clay (wt.%)57.633.61.10.30.40.02—10.040.020.034.94
Silt (wt.%)63.715.93.072.61.821.870.065.720.480.050.133.8
Table
Table 3. Testing Groups.
Table 3. Testing Groups.
Mix IdActivator PercentagesNa2O PercentagesMud Percentages
A06%3%0
S26%3%Silt-2%
S46%3%Silt-4%
S66%3%Silt-6%
S86%3%Silt-8%
S106%3%Silt-10%
C26%3%Clay-2%
C46%3%Clay-4%
C66%3%Clay-6%
C86%3%Clay-8%
C106%3%Clay-10%
M26%3%Mixed mud-2%
M46%3%Mixed mud-4%
M66%3%Mixed mud-6%
M86%3%Mixed mud-8%
M106%3%Mixed mud-10%
Table
Table 4. Testing results of different-parameter samples.
Table 4. Testing results of different-parameter samples.
Mix IdInitial Setting Time
(Min)		Final Setting Time
(Min)		Compressive Strength (MPa)Flexural Strength (MPa)
3 d7 d28 d3 d7 d28 d
A04615035.543.649.96.38.19.1
S24015935.143.247.96.27.98.8
S43618433.642.446.35.97.58.4
S63319429.137.840.85.26.77.5
S83120827.935.137.44.96.37.1
S102822525.532.334.74.25.86.6
C24216535.945.752.16.69.19.8
C43518634.542.448.45.97.78.7
C62721528.434.539.256.27
C82123825.831.135.44.75.76.4
C101724422.928.232.13.85.15.9
M24316135.243.850.16.58.29.3
M43717933.740.348.25.97.58.2
M63120629.235.138.95.46.37.1
M82621726.933.136.94.666.3
M102323823.331.234.44.15.25.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.; Chen, D.; Jia, Z.; Li, Y.; Li, P.; Yu, B. Effects of Mud Content on the Setting Time and Mechanical Properties of Alkali-Activated Slag Mortar. Materials 2023, 16, 3355. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093355

AMA Style

Li S, Chen D, Jia Z, Li Y, Li P, Yu B. Effects of Mud Content on the Setting Time and Mechanical Properties of Alkali-Activated Slag Mortar. Materials. 2023; 16(9):3355. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093355

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Shuaijun, Deyong Chen, Zhirong Jia, Yilin Li, Peiqing Li, and Bin Yu. 2023. "Effects of Mud Content on the Setting Time and Mechanical Properties of Alkali-Activated Slag Mortar" Materials 16, no. 9: 3355. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093355

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop