You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Materials
  • Review
  • Open Access

13 April 2023

Experimental Studies on TiO2 NT with Metal Dopants through Co-Precipitation, Sol–Gel, Hydrothermal Scheme and Corresponding Computational Molecular Evaluations

,
and
1
Centro de Investigación de Ciencias Humanas y de la Educación (CICHE), Universidad Indoamérica, Ambato 180103, Ecuador
2
Grupo de Polímeros, Departamento de Física y Ciencias de la Tierra, Escuela Universitaria Politécnica, Universidade da Coruña, 15471 Ferrol, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Research in Advanced Materials for Energy Storage Devices and Applications

Abstract

In the last decade, TiO2 nanotubes have attracted the attention of the scientific community and industry due to their exceptional photocatalytic properties, opening a wide range of additional applications in the fields of renewable energy, sensors, supercapacitors, and the pharmaceutical industry. However, their use is limited because their band gap is tied to the visible light spectrum. Therefore, it is essential to dope them with metals to extend their physicochemical advantages. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the preparation of metal-doped TiO2 nanotubes. We address hydrothermal and alteration methods that have been used to study the effects of different metal dopants on the structural, morphological, and optoelectrical properties of anatase and rutile nanotubes. The progress of DFT studies on the metal doping of TiO2 nanoparticles is discussed. In addition, the traditional models and their confirmation of the results of the experiment with TiO2 nanotubes are reviewed, as well as the use of TNT in various applications and the future prospects for its development in other fields. We focus on the comprehensive analysis and practical significance of the development of TiO2 hybrid materials and the need for a better understanding of the structural–chemical properties of anatase TiO2 nanotubes with metal doping for ion storage devices such as batteries.

1. Introduction

Titanium dioxide is a highly valued substance, used for its many beneficial properties in a variety of industrial products, including electronics, photovoltaics, paints, and food-grade materials. The creation of nanotubes in TiO2 phases, as well as their interactions with other metal dopants, biomolecule–polymer interactions, and interfacial processes, are leading to promising results in the fields of renewable energy and medicine. Nevertheless, much remains to be discovered about the properties of TiO2 nanotubes, and considering that there are numerous TiO2 phases, including rutile, anatase, brookite, hollandite, and metastable monoclinic phases. By stacking TiO6 octahedra with warped edges, their crystal forms are created [1]. In addition, the anatase phase is one of the most effective photocatalysts due to its high photocatalytic activity, chemical stability, and negative carrier potential. The photocatalytic activity is affected by physicochemical parameters such as the grain size, crystallinity, surface area to volume ratio, surface texture, and geometry [1,2]. The fundamental drawback of TiO2 for photocatalytic applications is that when exposed to visible light, only a very small fraction of the incident photons are utilized [2]. Rutile TiO2’s large band gap accounts for this. Recent research on doped rutile TiO2 has shown that it can be used in a wide variety of significant applications, such as photonic crystals, advanced ceramics, photoelectrochemical cells, and rutile-type TiO2 crystals, which are regarded as promising photocatalysts, particularly in enhancing the photocatalytic activity with the appropriate dopants [3]. Many metal oxide semiconductors (Fe2O3, TiO2, MgO, and WO3) are frequently utilized in photocatalytic dye degradation due to their superior chemical stability, low toxicity, and high band gap. Among them, low sensitivity, high oxidizing power, no toxicity, good physicochemical stability, a large band gap, effective antibacterial potential, and UV-induced photocatalytic activity are merely a few of the many qualities that TiO2 possesses [4]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced by metal oxide nanoparticles (MONPs). The band structure of pure MONPs differs from that of MONPs with dopants or defects. Dopant/defect engineering is a successful means of changing the band structures of MONPs and altering the generation of ROS. Some MONPs with dopants or defects also have applications in sensing, catalysis, and energy [5]. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering activity (SERS) may be effectively and steadily produced by non-metallic doping in semiconducting metal oxides, and it also offers a fresh means to investigate the connection between charge transfer (CT) in catalysis and semiconductor SERS performance [6]. The combined characteristics of the codopants in titanium dioxide nanotube (TiO2 NT) membranes have been detailed, and these membranes are different from their monodoped counterparts [7]. TiO2 NTs have a greater Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area (BET) compared to their powder form, which is helpful for one-electron oxidation during photocatalytic processes. The efficiency of photocatalytic processes is, however, constrained by the comparatively large band gap of TiO2 (3.2 eV) as a result of the high rate of photogenerated electron and hole recombination [8] (Figure 1). To solve this problem, when the metal ions Ag+, Al3+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Mn2+, Ni2+, V5+, and Zn2+ were doped into TiO2 nanotubes, except for Ag+, the creation of crystal defects by ion doping resulted in higher photocatalytic activity of the catalysts, decreased SBET, a smaller band gap (Eg) for TiO2, and a reduction in the rate of electron and hole recombination [9]. The doped ions can also operate as flat sites for the trapping of electrons and holes before reacting with H2O2, OH, and O2 to form -OH and O2 radicals. The investigations also showed that Mn2+ or Ni2+ doping had the opposite effect on the photocatalytic activity of the RB removal catalysts, which was enhanced when Ag+, Al3+, and Zn2+ were added to the TiO2 NTs. The elimination effectiveness of RB was 98.7% within 50 min in the presence of TiO2 NTs doped with Zn2+ and calcined at 550 °C [7,9]. TiO2 NTs are a form of widely used one-dimensional nanostructure, in addition to 1D (nanorods and nanowires), 2D (nanoribbon, nanosheet, and nanobelt), 3D (branching nanostructures and meso/nanoporous), and the crystal-facet-tailored TiO2 nanostructures. Due to their hollow form, NTs have 400 m2 more surface area per g than nanowires and higher porosity. According to reports, anatase TiO2 nanobelts had specific surface areas and total pore volumes of 119 m2g−1 and 0.666 cm3g−1, respectively [10]. Therefore, using NTs as the gas sensor material rather than nanowires is more practical for gas sensors. Within this context, doped one-dimensional TiO2 has received a great deal of interest because it is used in catalysis, optoelectronics, biochemistry, magnetic materials, photocatalysis, and electronics, as well as its mechanical properties and potential uses in other fields [1]. Their higher aspect ratios, active surface areas, and larger and more specialized surface areas, and their lower potentials as well as resistances, innovative electrochemical and optical properties, and increased catalytic activity, would make them viable choices. TiO2, which is based on transition metals, has been discovered to be a particularly excellent guest object for doping semiconductor materials [1,11]. The recurring crystal phases and coordinated cationic and anionic moieties in the TNT materials provide the materials with a stable, regulated shape. The TNT materials have potential for a variety of chemical, physicochemical, and chemical sensing applications because of their outstanding and superior electrocatalytic characteristics [12,13,14]. Considering the above diversity of existing TNTs, the chemical synthesis of metal oxide NTs has evolved significantly in the last century, and the synthesis of TNT metals/non-metallic dopants has experienced tremendous growth in recent decades since the advent of nanotechnology; from both scientific and technological perspectives, there is an urgent need to review the spectrum of molecular doping in terms of morphology, size, characterization, encapsulation, and nanocomposite behavior history. Therefore, the present review addresses various existing synthesis methods of TiO2 NTs in the presence of metal dopants. We have observed the dimension and size of various TiO2 NTs and the related physicochemical observations on the deposition of transition metals and their associated ions, such as Fe, Mo, Nb, Ru, Au, Ag, Pt, Cu, Co, Ni, V, Cr, and Mn. We have presented a DFT computational analysis for the doping of TiO2 nanoparticles, followed by the experimental synthesis methods of TiO2 NTs with metal dopants, the recent trends in the computational costs for the calculation of NT by classical and quantum molecular dynamic potentials, and, in the last section, we detail the future prospects of the synthesis methods for the metal doping of various TiO2 nanostructures, such as nanobelts and nanohelices of NT, which are important for renewable energy and other potential biological applications. Although TiO2 nanotubes present very valuable mechanical and optical properties, they have the drawback that the forbidden band is relatively large, so metal doping is an effective method to reduce this gap. In this regard, this review analyzes and evaluates the main findings of experimental methods for the metal doping of TiO2 nanotubes; among the most prominent methods are the hydrothermal method, sol–gel method, co-precipitation method, and electrochemical anodization method. Similarly, this study discusses the importance of computational simulation as a very promising alternative method, because although DFT has been used as the only method for analysis, classical molecular dynamics is still an unexplored method for the study of doping in metal oxide nanostructures such as TiO2 nanotubes.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the main production methods of TiO2 nanotubes. (a) Hydrothermal method. (b) Self-assembled electrochemical anodizing method. (c) Sol–gel method.

2. Main Experimental Methods for the Synthesis of TiO2 Nanotubes

2.1. Hydrothermal Method

Hydrothermal synthesis is primarily used to create metal oxide NTs [10]. By using it to create tiny-diameter TiO2 NTs, Kasuga et al. [15] developed the hydrothermal approach. Currently, this method is widely used since it is a simple and versatile method; it requires a solvent (H2O or another) at a moderate temperature and high pressure. As observed in Figure 1a, the process begins with a precursor solution that can be aqueous or non-aqueous. The suspension is stirred vigorously for 2 h at 50 °C. Then, the suspension is subjected to 130 °C for 22 h in an autoclave. The product obtained must be centrifuged, filtered, and the solid sample must be subjected to an annealing wash at 400 °C, with which the TiO2 nanotubes will be obtained.

2.2. Self-Assembled Electrochemical Anodizing Method

Self-assembled electrochemical anodization (SOA) allows for the production of nanostructured arrays (such as aligned holes, nanochannels, and NTs) that are vertically oriented, size-controlled, and back-contacted (i.e., bonded to a metallic substrate) [16]. The metal of interest (M) can be used as the anode in a straightforward anode/cathode configuration to achieve anodization. Under the proper voltage, where the supply of oxygen ions is normally H2O in the electrolyte, it oxidizes to form a metal oxide as the basis for the oxide growth process; see Figure 1b. Template-assisted growth can produce TiO2 NTs with a wide range of diameters and good homogeneity by simply changing the size and shape of the templates. For a procedure with a template, see [17]. Contrary to the electrochemical anodization method, it is compatible with a range of substrates, such as silicon and glass. The most common technique for creating NTs using positive template-assisted growth involves coating the templates’ outer surfaces with TiO2 and selectively etching them with wet chemicals. The first electrochemical deposition of TiO2 NTs with template-assisted growth was described by Hoyer et al. [18] employing an ordered alumina template with a positive polymer form that was acetone-dissolvable.

2.3. Sol–Gel Method

In the sol–gel scheme, a precursor is dissolved in a solvent to produce a suspended emulsion that forms a gel after constant stirring [19]. Once the congruent suspension is attained, composite templates of anodized alumina or membranes made of polymers are soaked in the liquid medium. Further, the templates’ pores are filled with suspended atoms and adopt their patterns; see Figure 1c. The required techniques of drying, calcining, and removing the gels produce the metal oxide NTs [20]. The template on which the particles are deposited, the content of the colloidal solution, the temperature, and the period of deposition all affect the particle size and the dimensions of the nanostructures [21,22,23,24,25]. The usability of the sol–gel nanostructures is constrained by the fact that they are frequently produced in bundled form [26]. The morphology of the final material is also impacted by the procedure needed to split the nanostructure derived from the template substance [26]. The studies on the synthesis of TNT by different methods are very limited, as noted by Shalini et al. [8], who discussed nearly thirty-five different methods for the preparation of TiO2 NTs, all of which dealt with the anatase phase.

3. Experiments on Doping of Metals on TiO2 NTs

TiO2 NT has improved properties for photocatalytic applications compared to colloidal and nanoparticulate forms. TiO2 NTs contain a higher concentration of OH. The strong photocatalytic activity of TiO2 NTs was greatly attributed to both the increased capacity to absorb UV light and the large specific surface area of the NTs. Anatase TiO2 NT has a band gap energy of 3.25 eV, which is somewhat higher than both rutile TiO2 (3.2 eV) and anatase TiO2 (3.2 eV) (3.0 eV). Rutile TiO2 modification has a direct energy gap of (3.0 eV) (−0.1 eV) [27], brookite (−3.4 eV) (−0.1 eV), and anatase −4.2 eV. The indirect gap caused by anatase alteration is (3.2 eV) (−0.1 eV). In the context of chemical doping of TiO2 NTs, the benefits of TiO2 are its lack of toxicity, abundance of resources, and chemical stability. As a result, TiO2 has received a lot of interest for a variety of applications, including lithium-ion batteries and biomedical ones [28,29,30,31,32].
TiO2 can be used; however, its applications are constrained by its broad band gap and high rate of electron–hole recombination. The photo-response of TiO2 must be expanded to the visible light area [33,34,35]; see Figure 2. In order to do this, a number of effective alterations have been made to improve the activity, including doping with metal ions—one of the most popular techniques—and decoration with metals, metal ions, and non-metals. Transition metals (TM) possess several valences and a d-electron structure that is not full in order to accept extra electrons, bring impurity levels into the TiO2 band gap, and operate as a shallow trap for photo-generated electrons or holes in order to restrict the recombination of electron–hole pairs [36,37,38,39,40]. Physical methods such as laser ablation, magnetron or thermal sputtering, ion implantation, and so on, as well as chemical methods such as solvothermal, chemical, and electrodeposition (Figure 3a), sol–gel, hydrothermal (Figure 3b), direct oxidation, and so on, are available for the synthesis of doped TiO2. Numerous benefits come with the hydrothermal approach, including affordability, ease of use, adjustable nucleation, a suitable reaction time and temperature, and high productivity. The hydrothermal method is particularly attractive because it allows the production of uniform TiO2 NTs with an outer diameter of around 10 nm [41,42,43]. Similar to NTs, TNTs have sparked a lot of interest in the biological fields due to their simplicity and the inexpensive cost of manufacture by electro-chemical anodization.
Figure 2. Mechanism of TiO2 photocatalysis—hv1: pure TiO2; hv2: metal-doped TiO2, and hv3: non-metal-doped TiO2.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the most used methods to dope TiO2 nanotubes using metals: (a) Self-assembled electrochemical anodizing method (b) Hydrothermal method.
By altering the applied potential, pH, the amount of F ions in the electrolytes, and other variables, it is possible to accurately control their lengths, wall thicknesses, and diameters [44,45,46]. In the context of NT, Sn-doped TiO2 (B) NTs had NT capacities of 241.6 mAh g−1 after 100 discharge/charge cycles at 0.1 °C, and 115.9 mAh g−1 after 10 cycles at 2 °C, according to Li et al. [47]. In order to reduce the Li+ transfer distance, Sn2+ doping appears to improve the electrical conductivity and contact between the electrode and the electrolyte. According to their research, Sn-doped TiO2 (B) NTs may have potential as a negative electrode component for creating reliable lithium-ion batteries. Although the results are promising, using a template-based liquid-phase deposition technique, Tu et al. [48] created Sn-TiO2 NTs. They discovered that the NTs had a maximum methylene blue degradation rate of 88% in 6 h and 95% in 8 h when exposed to UV light. The light absorption only reaches the near-UV range due to the quick recombination of photo-generated charge carriers in Sn-TiO2 and Sn doping in their research, which nevertheless has an impact on the photocatalytic efficiency. Li et al. [48] introduced an oxygen gap in TiO2 as a solution to this issue and a practical method to enhance the functionality of Sn. Although the results are promising, using a template-based liquid-phase deposition technique, Tu et al. [48] created Sn-TiO2 NTs. Because of the generation of an intergap containing electronic states as a result of the hybridization of the O 2p orbital with the Ti 3d orbital, the oxygen-coated TiO2’s band gap would be reduced as a result of charge transfer from the O 2p orbital to the Ti 3d orbital (Vo-TiO2). Figure 4 displays the photocatalytic performance and mineralization rates. Vo-TiO2 demonstrated more photocatalytic activity in comparison to TiO2, Sn-TiO2, and Vo-TiO2 due to more effective photoinduced charge separation and the use of visible light by introducing the oxygen gap and doping Sn into the TiO2 NTs.
Figure 4. (a) Rates of nitrobenzene photocatalytic mineralization by visible-light-exposed TiO2, Sn-347 TiO2, Vo-TiO2, and Vo-Sn-TiO2. (b) Rates of RhB photocatalytic mineralization when exposed to 348 TiO2, Sn-TiO2, Vo-TiO2, and Vo-Sn-TiO2. Ref. [48] is reprinted with permission. 2016 Elsevier B.V. 349 Copyright.
In the presence of an electric current, NTs serve as catalysts. As a result, they can provide molecules that come into contact with the reaction site’s electrons. Anatase has more warped angles between the Ti-O bonds than a 90-degree angle. Due to these configurational variations, anatase has a wider band gap (3.2 eV versus 3 eV) and less thermal stability than rutile [49,50]. However, anatase often has a greater specific surface area than rutile, which is very interesting for (photo)catalytic applications [29]. In fact, anatase and anatase–rutile combinations, such as P25, actually have stronger photocatalytic activity than rutile [46,51,52]. TiO2 NTs doped with Zn2+ had the highest catalytic activity, according to studies on doping with Zn metals, as a result of the weight fractions of the anatase phase, average crystallite sizes, SBET, energy band gap of the catalyst, and doped ions. These activities decreased as a result of doping with Mn2+ or Ni2+. According to Figure 5 [53], the TiO2 NTs exhibited a hollow, open structure with an average diameter of around 10 nm. The wall thickness of the tubes was also roughly 1 nm.
Figure 5. Images of 550 °C calcined Zn2+-doped transmission electron micrographs (TEM), reprinted with permission from Ref. [54]. Korean Society of Environmental Engineers, 2015.
Despite the fact that there is no known treatment for diabetes, diabetics should have their blood glucose levels closely monitored. Due to their versatility in terms of structural design and composition, ease of separation and storage, high stability, simplicity of fabrication, and tunable catalytic activity, these nanomaterials hold great promise for the development of colorimetric glucose biosensors. This activity is based on the peroxidase-like activity of these nanomaterials when used with glucose oxidase. The TiO2 NT and CeO2 combination provided by Zhao et al. [55] exhibits the largest concentration of Ce3+ and the best peroxidase-like activity when compared to nanowires (NW) and nanorods (NR). The reaction offers a simple approach for the colorimetric detection of glucose and H2O2 with detection thresholds of 3.2 and 6.1 M, respectively. This is due to the high activity of the CeO2/anatase phase of TiO2 NT. The details of the three nanostructures are shown in Figure 6 with different doping concentrations of CeO2 [55].
Figure 6. XPS spectra were used to calculate the concentrations of Ce3+ and Ce4+, which confirmed that the CeO2 NT had the best peroxidase-like activity. The presence of TiO2 promotes higher Ce3+ concentrations in the following order: CeO2/NT-TiO2@0.1 > CeO2/NR-TiO2@0.1 > CeO2/NP-TiO2@0.1 > CeO2/NW-TiO2@0.1. In comparison to CeO2/NW-TiO2, CeO2/NR-TiO2, and CeO2/NP-TiO2. Reprinted with permission from Reference [56]. American Chemical Society 2015, all rights reserved.
Food safety and quality have shown a variety of uses for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), including the analysis and detection of chemical and microbiological threats [57,58,59]. Recent advancements in SERS techniques for food safety and quality applications have concentrated on the development of enhanced SERS substrates and methods to (1) increase sensitivity and selectivity while reducing matrix interference, and (2) enable nondestructive sampling and in situ detection [57,58,59,60,61]. The activity and reproducibility of the plasmonic material used as the SERS substrate have a strong influence on the quality of the measured SERS spectra. Recently, according to Ambroziak et al. [62], the SERS activity of a layer of cubic silver nanoparticles on a tubular TiO2 substrate was found to be eight times that of a typical electrochemically nanostructured silver electrode surface. The deactivation of the active surface was also slowed down by silver nanoparticles on TiO2 NT substrates. The active surface had a milder deactivation process, which was also seen for silver nanoparticles placed on a TiO2 NT substrate. The geometric dimensions and SEM details of bare TiO2 NT and also cubic Ag nanoparticles/nanocubes (AgCNPs) @TiO2 NT are shown in Figure 7a,b.
Figure 7. (a) SEM at low (b) and high magnification: images of cubic Ag nanoparticles/nanocubes with an edge length of around 45 nm deposited by the droplet method on TiO2 NT in anatase form with an inner diameter of around 110 nm and a wall thickness of around 20 nm are shown. SERS spectroscopy is one of the most sensitive analytical tools available and is widely used in medicine. Ref. [63] is reprinted with permission. Copyright © 2019, MDPI AG.
To develop titanium-based implant materials, potentiodynamic polarization tests by Yu et al. [64] show that TNs modified with Au nanoparticles (AuNPs) are superior to unaltered TNs in terms of corrosion resistance. AuNPs are deposited on TiO2 NT arrays (TN) by electrochemical deposition to improve the surface properties. The corrosion resistance increases with the amount of charged AuNPs. The adhesion and proliferation ability of osteoblast cells on the AuNP-modified surface of TNT is greater than on the unmodified surface of TNT; this type of AuNP-TNT array can produce titanium-based implant materials to improve bioactivity. Similarly, the electrochemical stability of TiO2 NT deposited with Ag and Au nanoparticles was presented by Arkusz et al. [65], proving that it was possible to deposit Au nanoparticles with a size range of 20.3 ± 3 nm on the top, inner, and outer surfaces of TiO2 NTs and that doing so did not cause structural damage to the TNT. According to TNT re-crystallization testing, the annealed anatase TNT was stable in aqueous environments and did not experience any significant structural changes, as shown in Figure 8A. According to Figure 8B, TNT has lower conductivity because its EIS displays a larger semicircle than those of the other modified electrodes. The excellent conductivity of AgNPs results in a total increase in conductivity when TNT is modified with them. This is mostly because of the quick electron transfer. Another indication that TNT-infused Au nanoparticles are more conductive than TNT alone is the charge transfer resistance of AuNPs/TNT. Both AgNPs and AuNPs reduce the electrical conductivity without acting as ion traps. The difference between TNT modified with AgNPs and AuNPs in charge transfer resistance (Rct) should be noted. The increase in Rct could have been caused by the steric restrictions that AgNPs and AuNPs on the electrode had induced. Gold nanoparticles are smaller than silver nanoparticles; therefore, the electrostatic barrier causes repulsive interactions between AuNPs and TNT, increasing Rct [65].
Figure 8. In the anatase phase of TiO2 NTs, SEM analysis revealed a uniform, vertically oriented layer of NTs with a diameter of 50 ± 5 nm and a height of 1000 ± 100 nm nm, m, a surface area of 30.27 cm2, and a TNT density of 4.26 g/cm3 (AC). No breaking or delamination of the TNT layer occurred throughout the 2-hour annealing process, which was performed in an argon atmosphere. (A) Homogenous layer of vertically ordered, 50 nm diameter TNTs. (B) AuNPs of 15–50 nm, (C) FE-SEM doped with silver nanoparticles that are spherical and have a diameter between 5 and 40 nm, with 75% of the particles falling between 20 and 40 nm, (D) electrochemical impedance data (EIS) for TNT, AgNPs/TNT, and AuNPs/TNT measured in PBS, as well as the Nyquist impedance plots of the analyzed electrodes in the frequency range of 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz. With permission from Ref. [65] 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
According to a study by Kim et al. [66], Cu-coated TiO2 NTs are crucial for improving the performance of Li-ion batteries’ electrochemical system. The differential capacitance (dQ/dV versus V) for the first cycle of TiO2 NTs in the anatase phase and Cu-coated TiO2 NTs at a current density of 50 mA g−1 is shown in Figure 9a for TiO2 NTs in the anatase phase and Cu-coated TiO2 NTs, respectively, via their cell potential versus differential capacitance curves. The pristine and Cu-coated TiO2 NTs have a total discharge capacity of 253.9 and 259.4 mA h g−1, respectively. The faster response with Li-ions was related to the improved charge transfer behavior, such that the Cu-coated TiO2 nanotubes’ irreversible capacity loss was lower than that of the uncoated TiO2 NTs. These results support the copper coating of TiO2 NTs as an electrochemical performance enhancer. As shown in Figure 9, electrochemical studies revealed that Cu-coated TiO2 NTs exhibit better charge transfer behavior, better performance at high cycle rates, and higher discharge capacities than the original TiO2 NTs. Additionally, the results of the uniform Cu coating can be seen in Figure 10 as SEM and TEM images. It is observed that anatase NTs have a wall thicknesses of approximately 15 nm and interior diameters of approximately 100 nm. Each TiO2 NT in the array in Figure 10a is around 18 μm long and is equally spaced over the surface. The NTs have an inner diameter that varies between 40 and 50 nm, an inner wall thickness of around 30 nm, and an outside wall thickness of roughly 10 nm. Cu is consistently deposited on the surface of TiO2 NTs as shown in Figure 10b, in contrast to the original TiO2 NTs in Figure 10a. The inner diameter of the Cu-coated TiO2 NTs was smaller than that of the parent TiO2 NTs as a result of the uniformly coated Cu on the surface of the TiO2 NTs [66].
Figure 9. The differential capacity plot (dQ/dV vs. V) corresponding to the first cycle of the parent and Cu-coated TiO2 NTs at a current density of 50 mA g−1 is shown as (a) differential capacity vs. cell potential curves of parent and Cu-coated anatase-phase TiO2 NTs at 50 mA g−1. (b) Discharge–charge curves of the parent and Cu-coated TiO2 NTs between 2.7 and 1.0 V at a constant current density of 50 mA g−1 show that the Cu-coated TiO2 NTs’ Coulombic efficiency was 13.7% higher than that of the parent TiO2 NTs. The aforementioned findings point to a more pronounced charge transfer response in the Cu-coated TiO2 NTs during the charge–discharge procedure than in the parent TiO2 NTs. With permission from Ref. [66]. 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figure 10. SEM and TEM (inserts) images of parent TiO2 NT. According to the SEM and TEM images, the TiO2 NT array shown in (a) is uniformly distributed on the surface, with the lengths of the TiO2 NTs. (b) Cu is uniformly deposited on the surface of the TiO2 NTs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [66]. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V.
To achieve the efficient completion of the photoelectrochemical water-splitting process, it is possible to insert appropriately tailored nanostructures into the photoelectrode to improve the light–matter interactions for effective charge production, charge transport, and the activation of surface chemical processes [64,67,68,69,70]. In plasmon-enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting, the high electrochemically active surface area, optical absorption capability, and charge transfer rate play a key role in improving the photoelectrochemical activity of materials, as seen in the work by Cai et al. [71]. In particular, for ZnO-coated TiO2 NT, as shown in the SEM image of Figure 9a,b, when light with 420 nm wavelength cutoffs is irradiated, the result is as depicted in Figure 11a,b. In comparison to the naked TiO2 NTs, the ZnO-covered TiO2 NTs have improved photoelectrochemical activities. In particular, for the 10-cycle ZnO-covered TiO2 NTs, a considerable rise in the photoelectrochemical activity is seen. With the 10-cycle ZnO/TiO2 NTs, the PC density rises from 1.4 μA/cm2 for the naked TiO2 NTs to 2.2 μA/cm2. In contrast to the bare TiO2 NTs, the TiO2 NTs coated by a 10-cycle ZnO deposit or by a 2.1 nm ZnO coating exhibit an increase in photoelectrochemical activity of over 60%. The 10-cycle ZnO/TiO2 NT photoelectrode still displays quick and outstanding transient photocurrent responses in the PC density (Figure 11c) [71] after around 1.5 h of intermittent visible illumination with a cutoff wavelength of 420 nm.
Figure 11. (a,b) Top view and cross-sectional pictures of bare TiO2 NTs, 10-cycle ZnO/TiO2 NTs, and 25-cycle ZnO/TiO2 NTs with TiO2 NTs having average diameters of around 60 nm and wall thicknesses of around 15 nm, respectively. (b) When illuminated by light with a 420 nm wavelength, compared to the bare TiO2-NTs, the ZnO-coated TiO2 NTs exhibit increased photoelectrochemical activity. The 10-fold ZnO-coated TiO2 NTs in particular show a notable increase in photoelectrochemical activity. According to PC density (c), the 10-fold ZnO/TiO2 NT photoelectrode still exhibits rapid and excellent transient photocurrent responses under intermittent illumination after roughly 1.5 h of visible illumination with light of a 420 nm wavelength, as can be seen at PC densities transients of bare TiO2 NT (black line), 10-cycle ZnO/TiO2 NT (red line) and 25-cycle ZnO/TiO2 NT (blue line). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [71]. Copyright © 2023 BioMed Central Ltd., SpringerOpen.
Due to the physicochemical importance of metal-doped TiO2 NT, there are a number of variations and challenges associated with the various metal-doped TNTs. The following table (Table 1) explains the recent trends in the three main synthesis methods, size, phase, and dimension, as well as their characterization and physicochemical parameters, for different metal dopants of TNTs.
Table 1. Different methods of experimental synthesis, characterization, and their applications in metal doping for TiO2 nanotubes.

4. Computational Studies of TiO2 Nanotubes

4.1. DFT for Materials

Among the conventional computational models, the robustness and generality of first-principles electronic structure methods come at enormous computational expense. The first-principle electronic structure theories or ab initio approaches also refer to these techniques; they rely on the Schrödinger equation being solved, which, from the ground up, defines how electrons and nuclei move in a chemical system [105,106,107,108,109]. These methods calculate the molecular energy and associated properties of a given molecular system based on fundamental physical concepts, such as the electrical and nuclear composition of atoms and molecules. First-principles calculations provide precise evaluations and are always aimed at improving the calculation of the atomic- and electronic-level properties of materials. They are based on quantum physics, electrodynamics, statistical thermodynamics, and classical mechanics. First-principles calculations can now efficiently and accurately solve a wide range of material-related issues—for instance, those relating to the design of materials for electrical power production, automotive applications, energy storage, microelectronics, and the chemical industry generally [107,110,111,112,113]. Even though first-principles computations are time-consuming, the approximations can be improved in various situations, such as transition metal oxides, rare-earth compounds, van der Waals interactions, etc., by using so-called post density functional methods (DFT), which are computationally more difficult but still helpful [54,56,114,115,116]. By solving these quantum physics puzzles, first-principles calculations are kept devoid of any empirical knowledge, and their predictive power is particularly useful when searching for new materials with as-yet-unidentified properties [117,118,119]. The discovery of the actual thermodynamic ground state is aided by the fact that fundamental thermodynamical properties, such as the heat of formation, can be calculated at least as accurately as the results of experiments, but much more quickly and for a much wider range of potential structures and compositions. DFT electronic structure calculations can easily determine the forces on atoms and stresses, which is necessary for improving the structural parameters and determining the vibrational properties. By incorporating phonons, the applicability of DFT research is substantially increased because the majority of the effects of temperature on the free energy can be taken into consideration. These matrix-diagnostic schemes in quantum and classical mechanics provide microscopic details for the system of interest. One such example is that the properties of a doped semiconductor material calculated at DFT have practical potential for increasing the efficiency of a photoelectrochemical cell [120,121,122,123]. Additionally, a 210,000 × 210,000 matrix must be created and diagonalized in order to perform a DFT calculation and obtain the lowest eigenvalues of very large matrices—for example, for the smallest systems of 1000 basis functions with around 300 electrons [124,125,126,127]. This is much too large. This matrix alone demands around 300 GB of storage space on disk. The helical phototranslation symmetry of these structures at NTs was used to compute NT with large unit cells (432 atoms in the case of the (36,36) NT) [128,129]. Automatic structure generation, one- and two-electron integral computation, generation of the complete Fock matrix by rotating only the irreducible fraction of the Fock matrix, and diagonalization of the Fock matrix are all made possible by this symmetry [128,129,130].

4.2. Quantum Computational Verification of Experimental Doping of Metals on TiO2 Nanoparticles

A 40-nm-diameter cobalt-doped TiO2 nanoparticle was created. Based on DFT, it was determined that cobalt doping changed the band structure of TiO2 since the band gap of cobalt-doped TiO2 was 72% smaller than that of pure TiO2. The structure simulation and mechanism analysis have demonstrated the co-doped TiO2 gas sensor’s improved characteristics and excellent gas-sensing capabilities at ambient temperature [131]. An ab initio study of the systems Ti1−xRxO2 (R = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu for various concentrations of substitutional impurities) in the rutile structure revealed that magnetic moments are present in Fe, Co, and Mn but not in Cu or Ni [132,133]. These calculations reveal an essential fact: doping reduces the energy required for vacancies to occur, resulting in doped systems having more vacancies than undoped systems. These findings are consistent with the idea that oxygen vacancies are crucial to the development of magnetism in doped TiO2 and may help to explain the variety of magnetic moments that have been experimentally discovered in samples grown under various conditions [131]. Aspects of the electron paramagnetic resonance demonstrated that the co-precipitated TiO2 with Fe ions in place of the Ti ions had increased photocatalytic activity. This was credited to the Fe ions integrated into the TiO2 crystal lattice’s synergistic effects of greater visible light absorption and low recombination of electron holes. DFT calculations using the CASTEP package based on the plane-wave pseudopotential approach confirmed the role of Fe in the electronic structure of TiO2 [134]. In the DFT calculations, the hybrid B3LYP functional and the double zeta basis set LanL2DZ were used. In terms of photocatalytic activity for 4-nitrophenol degradation, Fe3+-doped TiO2 outperformed undoped TiO2. DFT calculations show that the introduction of new electronic states within the band gap is what causes Fe3+-doped TiO2 to become visible-light-active [135]. For a DFT computational examination of the formation energies of Si, Al, Fe, and F dopants of different charge states over different Fermi level energies in anatase and rutile, a local density approximation (LDA) study is a very well-liked and affordable technique [136]. The formation energy for F doping is shown to be the lowest at interstitial regions, whereas the substitutional sites of Ti have the highest stability for the cationic dopants. All dopants significantly stabilize anatase compared to the rutile phase, indicating that the conversion of anatase to rutile is prevented in such systems, with the dopants arranged in the order F > Si > Fe > Al according to the strength of anatase stabilization. The Al and Fe dopants act as shallow acceptors, with charge balance achieved by the formation of mobile charge carriers rather than anion vacancies [133,134,137,138,139]. In Si-TiO2, the Si dopant acts as an inhibitor of the phase transformation from anatase to rutile; in Al-TiO2, the Al dopants act as weak inhibitors of the phase transformation from anatase to rutile, and the Fe dopants act as inhibitors of the phase transformation in TiO2 [133]. TiO2 (Li-TiO2) have been studied by DFT [140]. Li itself is not magnetic; it creates holes in O-2p pi orbitals leading to magnetic moments in TiO2. The magnetic moments are delocalized but inhomogeneously distributed in the lattice, with long-range ferromagnetic interactions between them. The inhomogeneous distribution of the magnetic moments and the specific crystal symmetry lead to a distance dependence as well as a direction dependence of the stability of the ferromagnetism of the Li-TiO2 system. Calculations suggest that Li-TiO2 is a potential material for spintronics [140,141,142]. DFT calculations were carried out to examine the effects of Al or Cu doping on the electronic and geometrical structure as well as the photocatalytic properties of TiO2 to support sol–gel-based Cu and Al doping studies, and the result was as follows. By optical measurements, the Cu and Al impurities were found to reduce the optical band gap values of the films produced. Finally, the doping process played an important role in improving the photocatalytic efficiency of the samples. Compared with Cu-doped TiO2, the Al-doped TiO2 film showed the highest photocatalytic activity [143]. For Gram-negative E. coli and Gram-positive bacteria Aureus Staphylococcus, the antibacterial capacity of copper (Cu)-doped TiO2 (Cu-TiO2) was examined under visible light irradiation [144]. DFT studies showed that Cu+ and Cu2+ ions were introduced into the TiO2 lattice instead of Ti4+ ions, causing oxygen vacancies, and these improved the efficiency of the photocatalytic reaction [144,145,146]. Significantly high inactivation of bacteria (99.9999%) was achieved in 30 min of visible light irradiation by Cu-TiO2. First-principles calculations based on DFT [147] were carried out to examine the electrical and optical properties of pure rutile TiO2 and TiO2 doped with tin (Sn) and zinc (Zn). The SCAPS-1D simulator’s DFT-extracted carrier mobility, band gap, and absorption spectra of TiO2 were used to gauge how well solar cells performed in relation to the dopant concentration and TiO2 thickness. Particularly when compared to the performance of PSCs with Sn-doped and Zn-doped TiO2, the functionality of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) with 3.125 mol% maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) for Sn-doped TiO2 is 17.14, compared to 13.70% for undoped TiO2. Sn-doped TiO2 has 0.63% better PCE than Zn-doped TiO2 at the same doping concentration. The geometric structures and electronic properties of Ni-doped anatase and rutile TiO2 have been successfully calculated and simulated using a pseudopotential method for plane waves based on DFT. Under O-rich growth conditions, the band gap for substitutional Ni in Ti-doped anatase TiO2 shows a slight decrease of around 0.05 eV in comparison to pure anatase TiO2 and contains a number of impurity energy levels that may be the cause of the experimental photocatalysis’ red shift in the absorption edge and activity. The excitation energy of the photons decreases as a result of the impurity energy levels. When compared to pure TiO2, a roughly 0.05 eV smaller band gap is present [148]. Trends in the electronic structure and magnetic properties of TiO2-based strain gauges with impurities of transition metals (Sc, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn) using DFT were assessed. There is a significant magnetic moment in TiO2-Fe and TiO2-Mn, with values of roughly 4.21 Bohr Mag/cell and 3.48 Bohr Mag/cell, respectively [149]. However, based on the density of states, TiO2-Sc and TiO2-Ni show no change in magnetic properties compared to pure TiO2 [148,150]. TiO2 showed that the more frequent oxygen vacancies and high surface basicity of Ni2+-doped TiO2 contributed to higher nucleophilic attack activity for the hydrolysis of CWA [151]. To support the aforesaid conclusion, the surface structure and calculated charge distribution were obtained. The XRD spectra of NiO crystals, anatase- TiO2, with and without distinctive doping of Ni2+ (TiO2-Ni), were simulated and the corresponding theoretical curves were considered in comparison with the experimental data. The outcomes display that the experimental curves are in ideal agreement with the curves calculated through the DFT method, indicating that Ni2+ doping does now no longer affect the crystal structure. The calculations performed with the Materials Studio program package in the CASTEP module show that metals used for doping, such as Co, Ni, Sb, Zn, Ag, and Mn, decreased the band gap of TiO2 and shifted the position of DOS downward [149,152,153,154,155]. These effects facilitated the migration of charge carriers and increased the photoactivity. Doping with cerium leads to greater stability of TiO2 even at high temperatures, which offers greater advantages in industrial applications [156,157]. Ce and Zr doping of rutile TiO2 was investigated using DFT +U and the HSE06 implementation of the hybrid exchange method DFT [156,157,158,159], revealing favorable dopant incorporation, lower oxygen hole formation energies for Ce doping, and higher oxygen hole formation energies for Zr doping [160,161,162]. Depending on the Ce content and the method employed to manufacture the coupled photocatalyst, the photocatalyst Ce-doped TiO2 frequently has a lower band gap than TiO2 [157,159,163,164], enabling visible light activation. The Ce content of Ce-doped TiO2 determines the photocatalytic activity, which typically reaches a maximum when the Ce content is in the range of 0.025–0.6 mol% [157,159,163,164,165]. The CeO2/TiO2 interface is crucial for photocatalytic activity, because contact between CeO2/TiO2 influences activity by encouraging efficient charge separation and opening up holes for chemical reaction. For photocatalytic applications, 10% or less ceria is suggested for TiO2-CeO2 [164].

5. Current Demands to Understand the TiO2-NT–Metal Doping through Classical and Quantum Molecular Dynamics (MD) to Support Experimental Synthesis and Characterization

Classical molecular dynamics methods make an important contribution to materials design. In reality, a true physical system is made up of numerous components. As a result, MD simulation continues to be a distinctive tool for investigation at the tiny scale. In particular, we must consider the impact of temperature, annealing time, and time between heating steps on crystallization, phase transition, and structure during the doping process in nano-substrates [131]. In the study by M. Predota et al. [166], which does not refer to NT but represents an important approach to understanding the effect of NT, classical MD simulations were performed. To describe the microstructure of the interface between aqueous solutions and the rutile (R-TiO2) surface at the (110) temperature and to ascertain the impact of surface charge and hydroxylation on the adsorption of Rb+, Na+, Sr2+, Zn2+, and Ca2+ ions at the interface between a metal oxide and water, M. Predota et al. [166] used classical MD simulations. Despite the fact that the study was not exclusively focused on NT, their findings from comparing the observations of ion adsorption sites obtained using MD and X-ray techniques show that the charged hydroxylated surface model is superior to the non-hydroxylated model as a good approximation of the actual rutile–water interface. Although there is overall agreement regarding the adsorption sites for all ions and the precise ion positions for Rb+ and Sr2+, the height of the Zn2+ ions above the Ti-O surface for these two sites is significantly different according to the X-ray and MD data. Additionally, in order to make accurate predictions of both the qualitative and the quantitative nature of interfacial phenomena, it has been claimed that the study of the MD results of ion adsorption and their interpretation is essential. Similarly, in the work of Sadaf Shirazi-Fard et al. [167], a study on the encapsulation and release of doxorubicin from TiO2 NTs without doping with the anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX) was presented. According to experimental studies and MD simulations with all atoms, the diffusion coefficients (Di) of DOX molecules are in the order of 10-10 m2/s. DOX molecules have numerous H-bonding interactions with TiO2 NT walls and water, both short- and long-range. They calculated the strength of hydrogen bonds using radial distribution functions (RDFs) and combined radial/angular distribution functions (CDFs). In their study of Li-ion interaction with TiO2 nanostructures, Kerisit et al. [168] used MD and a core–shell potential model to look at Li-ion diffusion in rutile and anatase TiO2. It was investigated how electron polarons affect Li diffusion. Li-ions and electron polarons will form strongly coupled pairs at low Li mole fractions. It is demonstrated that the Li diffusion in rutile is 4–5 orders of magnitude faster than that in anatase. In the research by Yildirim et al. [169], MD simulations using the DLPOLY-MD package and DFT are used to assess the energetics and dynamics of Li-ion transport in anatase and amorphous TiO2 (Figure 12). An investigation was performed on how diffusivity is affected by the Li-ion concentration. In comparison to anatase, the diffusion of Li is slower in amorphous TiO2. According to reports, in amorphous TiO2, the highest Li intercalation ratio happens at concentrations of 50% and higher. DFT and MD simulations have been used to examine the impact of the Li-ion concentration on diffusivity in rutile TiO2. At concentrations of roughly 50%, the energy barrier is at its lowest.
Figure 12. Structures containing 4320 atoms used in the simulations for (a) TiO2 anatase, (b) TiO2 608 amorphous, (c) 50% Li-loaded amorphous, and (d) 50% Li-loaded anatase. Red, gray, and green spheres represent oxygen, titanium, and lithium, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [169]. Copyright © 2011, American Chemical Society.
This means that NTs, with their biocompatibility and chemical stability, are desirable materials for drug delivery systems. When employing TiO2 NT as the anode for Li-ion batteries, larger storage capacities and higher charge/discharge rates can be attained. This was demonstrated by Li-ions on anatase NTs in a (MD) simulation [170], as shown in Figure 13a,b for the atomic configuration of a lithium–TiO2 NT system; in their work, the simulation of adsorbed Li-ions reached saturation quickly depending on the temperature. The number of adsorbed ions increases when the temperature reaches 1000 K, but the quantity of ions drops as the temperature rises more. Li-ion adsorption does not significantly alter the volume of the NTs. Tetrahedral or octahedral sites are where the Li-ions are adsorbed. The ions jump to the surrounding sites during the simulation because the thermodynamically unfavorable octahedral sites, in contrast to tetrahedral sites, have no effect on the number of adsorbed ions. When the surface coverage is modest, the Li-ion adsorption on anatase NTs follows a Langmuir adsorption curve, resulting in few interactions between the deposited ions. These simulations demonstrate that anatase NTs are good potential anodes for Li batteries, and their findings support this assertion.
Figure 13. (a) Construction of anatase NT (red spheres: Ti, blue spheres); (b) simulation box (red spheres: Ti, blue spheres: O, green spheres: Li). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [170]. Copyright©2021 Elsevier Ltd.
TiO2 NTs were predicted by Zhenyu et al. [171] to have better electron transport than nanocrystal films. In the context of time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT), their observations of the quantum-classical approach to non-adiabatic (MD) (NAMD) reveal that oxygen vacancies, which are frequent in TiO2, significantly increase non-radiative energy losses. Localized Ti3+ states are produced by oxygen vacancies hundreds of meV below the TiO2 conduction band. These states encourage higher electron–phonon couplings, trap excited electrons, decrease the NT band gap, and make relaxation easier. These findings support the development of TiO2 NTs’ structure and charge transfer. Recently, Lei et al. [172] used MD simulations to examine the electrostatic characteristics of the interfaces between semiconductor TiO2 and plasmonic nanoparticles of Ag or Cu. To explore the optical and photoelectrochemical properties, they were deposited on TiO2 NT arrays (TiO2 R/T) using a two-step pulse electrodeposition technique. The results ensured that the bimetallic system had a large potential drop from the Helmholtz layer simulated by MD. An ab initio study was utilized by Elham et al. [173] to better understand how ruthenium doping and hydrogen passivation impacted the structural alteration and, subsequently, the overall electronic band structure of an anatase TiO2 NT (TNT) and its efficient water-splitting capacity. The electronic structure of Ru-doped a-TiO2 (001) and H:a-TiO2 (001) PscWf and post-processing programs from the Quantum Espresso package were used to calculate and optimize within DFT. A black Ru-doped TiO2-x sample with weak electronic coupling between its valance and conduction edge orbitals, which results in lower electron–hole recombination and rationalizes the experimental findings, is explained theoretically by their ab initio model of Ru-doped hydrogenated TiO2 NTs, Ru-doped, and a pristine sample. Sergei et al. [174] used a modified B3LYP hybrid-exchange correlation functional in the context of density functional theory to perform all calculations on perfect, both single- and double-walled (SW vs. DW) TiO2 NTs in the anatase and fluorite phases; their findings show that substitutional impurities can significantly change the electronic structures of both TiO2 and SrTiOO3 NTs. For N and S dopants, the difference between the highest occupied state and the lowest unoccupied state falls to 2.4 and 2.5 eV, respectively, and to 2.5 eV for C and Fe dopants in these flawed NTs. Because some impurity levels are located in the region between the two redox potentials, electron–hole recombination occurs. This makes the placement of the band gap edges less favorable for visible-light-driven photocatalysis. On the other hand, important studies on the mechanism of dynamic surface electron transfer have been carried out using Pt/rutile TiO2 of 3 nm size and simulation cells at X, Y, and Z = 6.43 nm and 31.78 nm as a type of effective photocatalyst that allows one to demonstrate significant advantages [175], despite the fact that no classical MD has recently been performed for Pt-doped TiO2 NT. The extremely small PT nanoparticle with a diameter of 3 nm that was deposited on the TiO2 surface could be examined thanks to MD simulation in combination with a reactive force field (REAXFF). Their MD results confirm the experimentally observed method for the regulated protection of highly active sites (such as PT, AU, and PD) on supports, which is essential for the development of efficient and reliable photocatalysts. The force field of optimal atom potentials for liquid simulations was used to simulate lithium + ion doped with ionic liquid (IL) on the TiO2-B (1 0 0) surface, and fixing the TiO2 substrate preserved the stable structure [176]. In the same way, simulations were carried out to investigate the mechanisms of wetting and regulation—specifically, how does the variation in the Li+ concentration affect the interfacial structure between ILS and TiO2? What effect does this have on the contact length and angle of the electrolyte droplets on the TiO2-B (1 0 0 0) surface? Doping with Li+ was predicted to slow down the dynamic wetting process and alter the final shape of the ionic liquid droplet. For this purpose, optimized condensed phase molecular potentials were used for MD (compass) studies that allowed them to investigate the structures and dynamic properties of a 1 M KOH solution on anatase TiO2 (001), (100), and (101) surfaces to understand the molecular details of the effect of KOH on the water splitting of the PEC phenomenon [177]. This study confirms that K+ ions prefer to bind to O2C on the TiO2 surface. Furthermore, the layering of oxygen and water atoms on TiO2 surfaces significantly regulates the kinetics of potassium ions. The first study of substantial amounts of water behavior on the surfaces of anatase (101) nanotubes with a diameter of 1 nm used traditional MD simulations [178], and the results show that water inside the tube diffuses more slowly than water in contact with the outer surface tint. The anatase phase of TiO2 NTs would allow them to create nanoscale ion beams and serve in place of the huge magnets currently used for beam steering, according to studies that have recently focused on the relatively restricted channeling property of TNT [179]. Based on the Lindhard planar channeling potential, (MD) simulations were used to examine the channeling of HE++ mega-electron ions (MEV) in titania nanotubes. The ion channeling phenomenon made it possible for titania nanotubes to have a diameter of 100 nm and 2 m and a length of 1 m and 2 m, as shown in the simulated trajectories of ions projected onto them. To study the gas-sensing properties of TiO2, Natalia et al. [180] used all MD atoms to model a 150 × 150 surface area of atomic planes of 100 anatase TiO2 and TiO2:MoO3 compounds to study their interactions with water, hydrogen, methane, and ethanol molecules at temperatures of 300 K and 573 K. The synthesis of anatase-modified TiO2 and TiO2: MoO3 composite materials with variable MoO3 content by the sol–gel method helped to verify the results of the simulations of molecular dynamics. On the basis of the synthesized oxide materials, single-electrode thermocatalytic chemical gas sensors were constructed, and experimental tests were carried out on their detection abilities for hydrogen, methane, and ethanol gases. According to IR spectroscopy data, the number of surface OH groups and adsorbed water molecules in the TiO2:TiO2 composite is significantly higher than in bare TiO2, and decreases with increasing MoO3 content. This experimental finding is reliable with the results of the (MD) simulation on the adsorption of the water molecule on the TiO2 and TiO2 surfaces. In recent years, the great differences in the properties of nanotubes and other TiO2 nanostructures have captured the attention of many researchers, since geometry is decisive in the interaction with other elements, as well as the combination with other materials [181,182,183]. In the same direction, to explore the formation of non-abundant TiO2 crystalline thin films (both rutile and anatase), Houska et al. [184] pulverized samples with a magnetron and performed atomic-level MD simulations with a Buckingham interaction potential, using a simulation technique that is iterative. They estimated the effect of the energy of the arriving atom, the structure of the substrate, and the lateral size (growing crystal) and the temperature of the substrate, and confirmed that the phenomena observed experimentally (in compared to anatase, the growth of rutile at higher energies per atom of the film and a higher temperature of the nucleation support temperature) were consistent with the MD results. The results shed light on the intricate relationships that exist between the process parameters and the structures of the TiO2 films that are deposited. Using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM), in situ ion irradiation TEM, and (MD) simulations, amorphous TiO2 nanotubes were compared with their crystalline counterparts, anatase TiO2 nanotubes. According to the calculations of MD [185], the internal stresses caused by the densification process during crystallization cause partially crystalline tubes to bend. TiO2 nanotube-enhanced biomedical devices have been shown to significantly affect mesenchymal stem cell proliferation, differentiation, and adhesion. Cells react to the nanotubes via increasing adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. In a biological environment, proteins act as an intermediate layer on the surface of the material to further promote cell adhesion and proliferation, and protein adhesion is the first event to occur when the implant surface makes contact with the biological environment (tissue, body fluids). Smaller-diameter TiO2 NTs have a greater surface area for the binding of positively charged proteins than larger-diameter NTs [186]. Histone has the most adsorbed protein in 100-nm-diameter nanotubes (10 nm in length), while 15-nm-diameter nanotubes have higher values.

6. Conclusions

This review summarizes the common techniques used to synthesize and modify the properties of TNTs. TNTs have great potential for applications in the energy industry as efficient photocatalysts, for photoelectrochemical water splitting for hydrogen production, and as better photoanodes in photovoltaics of solar cells, while poor solubility factors enrich their applications in various biomedical fields. Nanostructured TNTs with factors such as a tunable length, wall density, and pore size result in a large surface area for high-performance solar energy utilization. Here, we have detailed some important observations on metal dopants for TNTs. In particular, thermogravimetric analysis has shown that the co-addition of Co3O4-TNTs increases the thermal stability of epoxy resin (EP). This implies that Co3O4-TNTs can effectively increase the flame retardancy of EP and have a good synergistic flame-retardant effect. According to cone calorimeter measurements, EP/Co3O4-TNTs exhibited the lowest peak heat release rate and had 35.4% lower overall heat release than pure EP. This implies that Co3O4-TNTs can effectively increase the flame retardancy of EP and have a good synergistic flame-retardant effect. According to calorimetric experiments, TNT-loaded CeO2 can significantly increase the thermal stability and flame resistance of matrix materials. CdSe/TiO2 loaded with CeO2 may effectively slow the release quality and quantity of heat and encourage the creation of a protected carbon layer, which can achieve a flam-retardant effect. After 30 min of immersion in a CdSe precursor solution, CdSe/TiO2 NTs displayed a maximum photocurrent density of 0.0016 A/cm2, an improvement of around 10% over the original NTs when exposed to sunlight. The adsorption edge of the Ag-modified sample TNT significantly shifted to the blue. The unmodified TNT and Ag20-TNT samples had Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas of 392 and 330 m2g−1, respectively. The main challenge for doped TiO2 photocatalysts is that the photocatalytic activity is lower in visible light than in ultraviolet light. As a result, more research into these photocatalysts is required. The development of optimized dopants and doping strategies is a critical area of future research. Self-assembled TiO2-based NTs are a particularly promising avenue, as alloy growth and the anodization process enable previously unexplored doping techniques. Doping titanium dioxide with metals/non-metals increases the electrical conductivity due to the formation of local energy states within the band structure and/or the formation of lattice defects (oxygen vacancies, Ti3+ species). In addition, controlling the variation in the radii of host and doped ions and supporting oxygen depletion can lead to increased stability and activity of TiO2(B) during cycling in SIBs and LIBs. Combined with an extremely high degree of geometry control in reactive TiO2 systems, experimental and quantum DFT and classical computational studies are currently in demand, and there is still room for understanding the electrochemical performance and various metal-doped TiO2 NTs of anatase-based anodes for LIBs and SIBs using such effective nanostructures of NTs and in optimizing the comparative analysis of other anatase geometry states, such as nanorods, nanofibers, nanoribbons, nanowires, or nanoplates, with similar metal doping to produce hybrids and nanocomposites for use in metal-ion batteries and other related renewable energy applications including machine learning to improve classical (MD) simulations without increasing the computational complexity and providing a methodology that could be used to predict other electronic properties of a larger system of NTs with metal doping that cannot be calculated with classical simulations alone. Due to their high aspect ratio, exceptional flexibility, elasticity, and optical qualities, TiO2 nanohelices (NHs) have garnered a lot of attention. These characteristics give rise to promising performance in a wide range of crucial domains, including optics, electronics, and micro/nanodevices. However, creating spatially anisotropic helical structures from stiff TiO2 nanowires (TiO2 NWs) is still difficult. To assemble individual TiO2 Nws into a DNA-like helical structure, a pressure-induced hydrothermal method was developed [187]. Vertical TiO2 nanohelix arrays were created by intertwining synthesized TiO2 NHs (50 nm in diameter, 5–7 mm in length) with TiO2 NHBs (20 nm in diameter) (NHAs). Thus, theoretical calculations also supported the finding that straight TiO2 NWs preferentially change into helical conformations with the lowest possible entropy (S) and free energy (F) to continue growing in a small area. The excellent elastic characteristics have a lot of potential for use as buffer materials or in flexible devices. The creation of new hybrid materials will be greatly aided by additional computational and experimental verification of the NT nanohelices of TNTs, as with the doping of NT.
In the same way, another relevant aspect is that the classical (MD) simulations that are currently available and are experimentally challenging include the formation of nanotubes in the aforementioned TiO2 phases and their interactions with other metal dopants, as well as the interactions between biomolecules and polymers and interfacial aspects. We believe that in experiments with various doping elements, such as DFT research, similar processes can be replicated using classical MD. Furthermore, a modern technique for simulating Ni-doped MoS2 to understand the effect of doping was found to be the reactive force field (ReaxFF), connecting quantum mechanical and experiments [188]. This makes TNT metal doping using ReaxFF a particularly useful tool to understand the dynamics of doping research [189].

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, S.P.T. methodology, S.P.T.; validation, S.P.T. and E.P.E.R.; formal analysis, S.P.T. and E.P.E.R.; investigation, S.P.T. and E.P.E.R.; resources, S.P.T. and J.L.L.; data curation, E.P.E.R. and S.P.T.; writing—original draft preparation, S.P.T.; writing—review and editing S.P.T. and E.P.E.R.; visualization, E.P.E.R. and S.P.T.; supervision, S.P.T. and J.L.L.; project administration, S.P.T. and J.L.L.; funding acquisition S.P.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support from the seed grant “Computational modeling of biomaterials and applications to bioengineering and classical and quantum machine learning for predicting social engineering (2022–2026, code: INV-0014-03-011)”, Universidad Indoamérica, Ecuador, awarded to S.P.T.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Reghunath, S.; Pinheiro, D.; Sunaja Devi, K.R. A review of hierarchical nanostructures of TiO2: Advances and applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2021, 3, 100063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liang, S.; Wang, X.; Cheng, Y.; Xia, Y.; Müller-Buschbaum, P. Anatase titanium dioxide as rechargeable ion battery electrode-A chronological review. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 45, 201–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ikram, M.; Haq, M.; Haider, A.; Haider, J.; Ul-Hamid, A.; Shahzadi, I.; Bari, M.; Ali, S.; Goumri-Said, S.; Kanoun, M. The enhanced photocatalytic performance and first-principles computational insights of Ba doping-dependent TiO2 quantum dots. Nanoscale Adv. 2022, 4, 3996–4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Krysiak, O.; Barczuk, P.; Bienkowski, K.; Wojciechowski, T.; Augustynski, J. The photocatalytic activity of rutile and anatase TiO2 electrodes modified with plasmonic metal nanoparticles followed by photoelectrochemical measurements. Catal. Today 2019, 321, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Saleh, N.; Milliron, D.; Aich, N.; Katz, L.; Liljestrand, H.; Kirisits, M. Importance of doping, dopant distribution, and defects on electronic band structure alteration of metal oxide nanoparticles: Implications for reactive oxygen species. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 568, 926–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wen, S.; Mu, M.; Xie, Q.; Zhao, B.; Song, W. Investigation of Sulfur Doping in Mn–Co Oxide Nanotubes on Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Properties. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 5987–5995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Saleh, I.; Ding, Y.; Nagpal, P. Co-doping metal oxide nanotubes: Superlinear photoresponse and multianalyte sensing. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 1150b1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kharissova, O.; Torres-Martinez, L.; Kharisov, B. Handbook of Nanomaterials and Nanocomposites for Energy and Environmental Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; ISBN 978-3-030-36268-3. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yuan, R.; Zhou, B.; Hua, D.; Shi, C.; Ma, L. Effect of metal-ion doping on the characteristics and photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanotubes for the removal of toluene from water. Water Sci. Technol. 2014, 69, 1697–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wen, W.; Wu, J.; Jiang, Y.; Yu, S.; Bai, J.; Cao, M.; Cui, J. Anatase TiO2 ultrathin nanobelts derived from room-temperature-synthesized titanates for fast and safe lithium storage. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rahman, M.; Asiri, A. Fabrication of highly sensitive ethanol sensor based on doped nanostructure materials using tiny chips. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 63252–63263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dharma, H.; Jaafar, J.; Widiastuti, N.; Matsuyama, H.; Rajabsadeh, S.; Othman, M.; Rahman, M.; Jafri, N.; Suhaimin, N.; Nasir, A.; et al. A review of titanium dioxide (TiO2)-based photocatalyst for oilfield-produced water treatment. Membranes 2022, 12, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kumar, S.; Rao, K. Polymorphic phase transition among the titania crystal structures using a solution-based approach: From precursor chemistry to nucleation process. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 11574–11632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Canu, G.; Buscaglia, V. Hydrothermal synthesis of strontium titanate: Thermodynamic considerations, morphology control and crystallisation mechanisms. CrystEngComm 2017, 19, 3867–3891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kasuga, T.; Hiramatsu, M.; Hoson, A.; Sekino, T.; Niihara, K. Formation of titanium oxide nanotube. Langmuir 1998, 15, 3160–3163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lee, W.; Smyrl, W. Oxide nanotube arrays fabricated by anodizing processes for advanced material application. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2008, 8, 818–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sander, M.; Cote, M.; Gu, W.; Kile, B.; Tripp, C. Template-assisted fabrication of dense, aligned arrays of titania nanotubes with well-controlled dimensions on substrates. Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, 2052–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hoyer, P. Formation of a titanium dioxide nanotube array. Langmuir 1996, 12, 1411–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ban, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Ohya, Y. Fabrication of titania films by sol–gel method using transparent colloidal aqueous solutions of anatase nanocrystals. Thin Solid Films 2011, 519, 3468–3474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tsvetkov, N.; Larina, L.; Ku Kang, J.; Shevaleevskiy, O. Sol-gel processed TiO2 nanotube photoelectrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells with enhanced photovoltaic performance. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qin, N.; Pan, A.; Yuan, J.; Ke, F.; Wu, X.; Zhu, J.; Liu, J.; Zhu, J. One-step construction of a hollow Au@ Bimetal–Organic framework core-shell catalytic nanoreactor for selective alcohol oxidation reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 12463–12471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rao, C.; Zhou, L.; Pan, Y.; Lu, C.; Qin, X.; Sakiyama, H.; Muddassir, M.; Liu, J. The extra-large calixarene-based MOFs-derived hierarchical composites for photocatalysis of dye: Facile syntheses and contribution of carbon species. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 897, 163178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, A.; Singh, A.K.; Liu, J.; Kumar, A. Syntheses, design strategies, and photocatalytic charge dynamics of met-al–organic frameworks (MOFs): A catalyzed photo-degradation approach towards organic dyes. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2021, 11, 3946–3989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zheng, M.; Chen, J.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, Y.; Lu, C.; Liu, Y.; Singh, A.; Trivedi, M.; Kumar, A.; Liu, J. Metal Organic Framework as an Efficient Adsor-bent for Drugs from Wastewater. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 31, 103514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kang, X.; Liu, S.; Dai, Z.; He, Y.; Song, X.; Tan, Z. Titanium dioxide: From engineering to applications. Catalysts 2019, 9, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Owens, G.; Singh, R.; Foroutan, F.; Alqaysi, M.; Han, C.; Mahapatra, C.; Kim, H.; Knowles, J. Sol–gel based materials for biomedical applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2016, 77, 1–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Errico, L.; Renteria, M.; Weissmann, M. Theoretical study of magnetism in transition-metal-doped TiO2 and TiO2-δ. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 184425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, Y.; Liu, M.; Wang, M.; Oloyede, A.; Bell, J.; Yan, C. Nanoindentation study of the mechanical behavior of TiO2 nanotube arrays. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 118, 145301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fasakin, O.; Oyedotun, K.; Kebede, M.; Rohwer, M.; Le Roux, L.; Mathe, M.; Eleruja, M.; Ajayi, E.; Manyala, N. Preparation and physico-chemical investigation of anatase TiO2 nanotubes for a stable anode of lithium-ion battery. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chakhtouna, H.; Benzeid, H.; Zari, N.; Qaiss, A.; Bouhfid, R. Recent progress on Ag/TiO2 photocatalysts: Photocatalytic and bactericidal behaviors. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 44638–44666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhang, M.; Chen, J.; Li, H.; Wang, C. Recent progress in Li-ion batteries with TiO2 nanotube anodes grown by electrochemical anodization. Rare Met. 2021, 40, 249–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Paul, S.; Rahman, M.; Sharif, S.; Kim, J.; Siddiqui, S.; Hossain, M. TiO2 as an Anode of high-performance lithium-ion batteries: A Comprehensive Review towards Practical Application. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Pesci, F.; Wang, G.; Klug, D.; Li, Y.; Cowan, A. Efficient suppression of electron–hole recombination in oxygen-deficient hydrogen-treated TiO2 nanowires for photoelectrochemical water splitting. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 25837–25844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Baldovi, H.; Albarracin, F.; Atienzar, P.; Ferrer, B.; Alvaro, M.; Garcia, H. Visible-Light Photoresponse of Gold Nanoparticles Supported on TiO2: A Combined Photocatalytic, Photoelectrochemical, and Transient Spectroscopy Study. ChemPhysChem 2015, 16, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lee, J.; Moon, S.; Patil, S.; Lee, K. Visible photoresponse of TiO2 nanotubes in comparison to that of nanoparticles and anodic thin film. Catal. Today 2022, 403, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fu, Y.; Mo, A. A review on the electrochemically self-organized titania nanotube arrays: Synthesis, modifications, and biomedical applications. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jiang, D.; Otitoju, T.; Ouyang, Y.; Shoparwe, N.; Wang, S.; Zhang, A.; Li, S. A review on metal ions modified TiO2 for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Etacheri, V.; Di Valentin, C.; Schneider, J.; Bahnemann, D.; Pillai, S. Visible-light activation of TiO2 photocatalysts: Advances in theory and experiments. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. Rev. 2015, 25, 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  39. Madan, D.; Misra, K.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Halder, N. Rare earth–doped TiO2 nanoparticles for photocatalytic dye remediation. Ceram. Sci. Eng. 2022, 1, 215–234. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, S.; Ding, Z.; Chang, X.; Xu, J.; Wang, D. Modified nano-TiO2 based composites for environmental photocatalytic applications. Catalysts 2020, 10, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, X.; Mao, S. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: Synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2891–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, H.; Duan, X.; Liu, G.; Li, L. Synthesis and characterization of copper ions surface-doped titanium dioxide nanotubes. Mater. Res. Bull. 2008, 43, 1971–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alkanad, K.; Hezam, A.; Al-Zaqri, N.; Bajiri, M.; Alnaggar, G.; Drmosh, Q.; Almukhlifi, H.; Neratur Krishnappagowda, L. One-Step Hydrothermal Synthesis of Anatase TiO2 Nanotubes for Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 38686–38699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, N.; Chen, X.; Zhang, J.; Schwank, J. A review on TiO2-based nanotubes synthesized via hydrothermal method: Formation mechanism, structure modification, and photocatalytic applications. Catal. Today 2014, 225, 34–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Puga, M.; Venturini, J.; Caten, C.; Bergmann, C. Influencing parameters in the electrochemical anodization of TiO2 nanotubes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 19513–19526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, Q.; Huang, J.; Li, H.; Zhao, A.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Sun, H.; Lai, Y. Recent advances on smart TiO2 nanotube platforms for sustainable drug delivery applications. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Li, J.; Yang, D.; Zhu, X.; Wang, L.; Umar, A.; Song, G. Preparation and Electrochemical Characterization of Sn–Doped TiO2 (B) Nanotube as an Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Battery. Sci. Adv. Mater. 2015, 7, 821–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, J.; Xu, X.; Liu, X.; Yu, C.; Yan, D.; Sun, Z.; Pan, L. Sn doped TiO2 nanotube with oxygen vacancy for highly efficient visible light photocatalysis. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 679, 454–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Paunovic, V.; Rellán-Piñeiro, M.; Lopez, N.; Perez-Ramirez, J. Activity differences of rutile and anatase TiO2 polymorphs in catalytic HBr Oxidation. Catal. Today 2021, 369, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hanaor, D.; Sorrell, C. Review of the anatase to rutile phase transformation. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 855–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, Y.; Xu, M.; Peng, Z.; Zheng, G. Direct growth of mesoporous Sn-doped TiO2 thin films on conducting substrates for lithium-ion battery anodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 13222–13226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, X.; Bao, Z.; Tao, X.; Sun, H.; Chen, W.; Zhou, X. Sn-doped TiO2 nanorod arrays and application in perovskite solar cells. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 64001–64005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gao, X.; Zhou, B.; Yuan, R. Doping a metal (Ag, Al, Mn, Ni and Zn) on TiO2 nanotubes and its effect on Rhodamine B photocatalytic oxidation. Environ. Eng. Res. 2015, 20, 329–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hermann, J.; Tkatchenko, A. van der Waals Interactions in Material Modelling. In Handbook of Materials Modeling: Methods: Theory and Modeling; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 259–291. [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhao, H.; Dong, Y.; Jiang, P.; Wang, G.; Zhang, J. Highly dispersed CeO2 on TiO2 nanotube: A synergistic nanocomposite with superior peroxidase-like activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 6451–6461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Vo, H.; Zhang, S.; Wang, W.; Galli, G. Lessons learned from first-principles calculations of transition metal oxides. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 38, 174704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Roguska, A.; Kudelski, A.; Pisarek, M.; Lewandowska, M.; Kurzydłowski, K.; Janik-Czachor, M. In situ spectroelectrochemical surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) investigations on composite Ag/TiO2-nanotubes/Ti substrates. Surf. Sci. 2009, 603, 2820–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lin, Z.; He, L. Recent advance in SERS techniques for food safety and quality analysis: A brief review. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2019, 28, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kadir, M.; Nemkayeva, R.; Baigarinova, G.; Alpysbayeva, B.; Assembayeva, A.; Smirnov, V. SERS-active substrates based on Ag-coated TiO2 nanotubes and nanograss. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostructures 2023, 145, 115499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pisarek, M.; Krawczyk, M.; Kosiński, A.; Hołdyński, M.; Andrzejczuk, M.; Krajczewski, J.; Bieńkowski, K.; Solarska, R.; Gurgul, M.; Zaraska, L.; et al. Materials characterization of TiO2 nanotubes decorated by Au nanoparticles for photoelectrochemical applications. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 38727–38738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dong, M.; Wu, S.; Liu, Y.; Pan, S.; Yu, T.; Yang, L.; Lu, L.; Luo, H.; Zhang, W.; Chen, J. Rapid Electrochemical Preparation of Highly Ordered Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) Substrate Based on TiO2-Ag Nanotubes. In Optical Sensors; Optica Publishing Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2022; p. SM4E-7. ISBN 978-1-957171-10-4. [Google Scholar]
  62. Ambroziak, R.; Hołdyński, M.; Płociński, T.; Pisarek, M.; Kudelski, A. Cubic silver nanoparticles fixed on TiO2 nanotubes as simple and efficient substrates for surface enhanced Raman scattering. Materials 2019, 12, 3373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pham, T.; Ping, Y.; Galli, G. Modelling heterogeneous interfaces for solar water splitting. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bai, Y.; Bai, Y.; Wang, C.; Gao, J.; Ma, W. Fabrication and characterization of gold nanoparticle-loaded TiO2 nanotube arrays for medical implants. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2016, 27, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Arkusz, K.; Nycz, M.; Paradowska, E.; Pijanowska, D. Electrochemical stability of TiO2 nanotubes deposited with silver and gold nanoparticles in aqueous environment. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2021, 15, 100401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kim, S.; Choi, S. Fabrication of Cu-coated TiO2 nanotubes and enhanced electrochemical performance of lithium ion batteries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2015, 744, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ren, K.; Gan, Y.; Young, T.; Moutassem, Z.; Zhang, L. Photoelectrochemical responses of doped and coated titanium dioxide composite nanotube anodes. Compos. Part B Eng. 2013, 52, 292–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Das, C.; Roy, P.; Yang, M.; Jha, H.; Schmuki, P. Nb doped TiO2 nanotubes for enhanced photoelectrochemical water-splitting. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 3094–3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Puga, M.; Caten, C.; Bergmann, C. Photoelectrochemical Performance of Doped and Undoped TiO2 Nanotubes for Light-Harvesting and Water Splitting Techniques: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. In Environmental Applications of Nanomaterials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 171–183. [Google Scholar]
  70. Fan, X.; Fan, J.; Hu, X.; Liu, E.; Kang, L.; Tang, C.; Ma, Y.; Wu, H.; Li, Y. Preparation and characterization of Ag deposited and Fe doped TiO2 nanotube arrays for photocatalytic hydrogen production by water splitting. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 15907–15917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cai, H.; Liang, P.; Hu, Z.; Shi, L.; Yang, X.; Sun, J.; Xu, N.; Wu, J. Enhanced photoelectrochemical activity of ZnO-coated TiO2 nanotubes and its dependence on ZnO coating thickness. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shaban, M.; Ahmed, A.; Shehata, N.; Betiha, M.; Rabie, A. Ni-doped and Ni/Cr co-doped TiO2 nanotubes for enhancement of photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 555, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Razali, M.; Noor, A.; Yusoff, M. Hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of Cu2+/F–Co-doped titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanotubes as photocatalyst for methyl orange degradation. Sci. Adv. Mater. 2017, 9, 1032–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lim, J.; Yang, Y.; Hoffmann, M. Activation of peroxymonosulfate by oxygen vacancies-enriched cobalt-doped black TiO2 nanotubes for the removal of organic pollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 6972–6980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Van Viet, P.; Huy, T.; You, S.; Thi, C. Others Hydrothermal synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic activity of silicon doped TiO2 nanotubes. Superlattices Microstruct. 2018, 123, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wei, X.; Wang, H.; Zhu, G.; Chen, J.; Zhu, L. Iron-doped TiO2 nanotubes with high photocatalytic activity under visible light synthesized by an ultrasonic-assisted sol-hydrothermal method. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 4009–4016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Xu, H.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, W.; Chu, W. A composite Sb-doped SnO2 electrode based on the TiO2 nanotubes prepared by hydrothermal synthesis. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2011, 6, 6639–6652. [Google Scholar]
  78. Deng, L.; Wang, S.; Liu, D.; Zhu, B.; Huang, W.; Wu, S.; Zhang, S. Synthesis, characterization of Fe-doped TiO2 nanotubes with high photocatalytic activity. Catal. Lett. 2009, 76, 513–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wu, K.; Shi, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, J. Effect of Ce-doping on microstructure and adsorption-photodegradation behaviors of the hydrothermally-synthesized TiO2 nanotubes. Crystals 2022, 12, 1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Aydın, M.; Hoşgün, H.; Dede, A.; Güven, K. Synthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity of silver-doped TiO2 nanotubes. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 205, 503–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, Y.; Hu, H.; Chang, M.; Chen, D.; Zhang, M.; Wu, L.; Li, X. Non-uniform doping outperforms uniform doping for enhancing the photocatalytic efficiency of Au-doped TiO2 nanotubes in organic dye degradation. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 9053–9059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kulish, M.; Struzhko, V.; Bryksa, V.; Murashko, A.; Il’in, V. Hydrothermal synthesis and properties of titania nanotubes doped with Fe, Ni, Zn, Cd, Mn. Semicond. Phys. Quantum Electron. Optoelectron. 2011, 14, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, C.; Ao, Y.; Wang, P.; Hou, J.; Qian, J. Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of the neodymium-doped TiO2 hollow spheres. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 257, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, M.; Song, G.; Li, J.; Miao, L.; Zhang, B. Direct hydrothermal synthesis and magnetic property of titanate nanotubes doped magnetic metal ions. J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing, Miner. Metall. Mater. 2008, 15, 644–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Eder, D.; Motta, M.; Windle, A. Iron-doped Pt–TiO2 nanotubes for photo-catalytic water splitting. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 055602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Yan, D.; Yu, C.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Lu, T.; Pan, L. Enhanced electrochemical performances of anatase TiO2 nanotubes by synergetic doping of Ni and N for sodium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 254, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Xiao, J.; Pan, Z.; Zhang, B.; Liu, G.; Zhang, H.; Song, X.; Hu, G.; Xiao, C.; Wei, Z.; Zheng, Y. The research of photocatalytic activity on Si doped TiO2 nanotubes. Mater. Lett. 2017, 188, 66–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Low, I.; Albetran, H.; Prida, V.; Vega, V.; Manurung, P.; Ionescu, M. A comparative study on crystallization behavior, phase stability, and binding energy in pure and Cr-doped TiO2 nanotubes. J. Mater. Res. 2013, 28, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhang, Y.; Gu, D.; Zhu, L.; Wang, B. Highly ordered Fe3+/TiO2 nanotube arrays for efficient photocataltyic degradation of nitrobenzene. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 420, 896–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhang, X.; Yu, L.; Tie, J.; Dong, X. Gas sensitivity and sensing mechanism studies on Au-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays for detecting SF6 decomposed components. Sensors 2014, 14, 19517–19532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yuan, R.; Zhou, B.; Hua, D.; Shi, C. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of humic acids using Al and Fe co-doped TiO2 nanotubes under UV/ozonation for drinking water purification. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 262, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yu, C.; Bai, Y.; Yan, D.; Li, X.; Zhang, W. Improved electrochemical properties of Sn-doped TiO2 nanotube as an anode material for lithium ion battery. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2014, 18, 1933–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ding, D.; Ning, C.; Huang, L.; Jin, F.; Hao, Y.; Bai, S.; Li, Y.; Li, M.; Mao, D. Anodic fabrication and bioactivity of Nb-doped TiO2 nanotubes. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 305103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Xu, Z.; Li, Q.; Gao, S.; Shang, J. Synthesis and characterization of niobium-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays by anodization of Ti–20Nb alloys. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2012, 28, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Quang, D.; Toan, T.; Tung, T.; Hoa, T.; Mau, T.; Khieu, D. Synthesis of CeO2/TiO2 nanotubes and heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5999–6011. [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhang, D.; Chen, J.; Xiang, Q.; Li, Y.; Liu, M.; Liao, Y. Transition-metal-ion (Fe, Co, Cr, Mn, Etc.) doping of TiO2 nanotubes: A general approach. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 12511–12515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Hang, R.; Huang, X.; Tian, L.; He, Z.; Tang, B. Preparation, characterization, corrosion behavior and bioactivity of Ni2O3-doped TiO2 nanotubes on NiTi alloy. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 70, 382–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Pan, H.; Ma, W.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Lu, F.; Yu, B.; Zhang, X. Co-Effect Flame Retardation of Co3O4-Loaded Titania Nanotubes and α-Zirconium Phosphate in the Epoxy Matrix. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 28475–28482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ghayeb, Y.; Momeni, M.; Mozafari, A. Effect of silver sulfide decorating on structural, optical and photo catalytic properties of iron-doped titanium dioxide nanotubes films. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2016, 27, 11804–11813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Dong, Z.; Ding, D.; Li, T.; Ning, C. Ni-doped TiO2 nanotubes photoanode for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 443, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, Z.; Pan, H.; Ma, W.; Liang, J.; Shen, Q.; Zhu, Q.; Yang, X. Synthesis of CeO2-loaded titania nanotubes and its effect on the flame retardant property of epoxy resin. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2019, 30, 2136–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lai, C.; Lau, K.; Chou, P. CdSe/TiO2 nanotubes for enhanced photoelectrochemical activity under solar illumination: Influence of soaking time in CdSe bath solution. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2019, 714, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tsai, C.; Liu, C.; Hsi, H.; Lin, K.; Lin, Y.; Lai, L. Synthesis of Ag-modified TiO2 nanotube and its application in photocatalytic degradation of dyes and elemental mercury. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2019, 94, 3251–3262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yu, H.; Huang, C.; Deng, Y.; Chen, B.; Wu, D.; Xu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, H. Preparation of Li+: TiO2 nanowires, Li4Ti5O12 nanotubes, and a Li4Ti5O2 nanotube/graphene composite by single-spinneret electrospinning for application in a lithium-ion battery. CrystEngComm 2022, 24, 7482–7492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Møller, C.; Plesset, M. Note on an approximation treatment for many-electron systems. Phys. Rev. 1934, 46, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Council, N. Others Beyond the Molecular Frontier: Challenges for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2003; ISBN 0-309-08477-6. [Google Scholar]
  107. Sherrill, C. Frontiers in electronic structure theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 110902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Bowler, D.; Miyazaki, T. Methods in electronic structure calculations. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2012, 75, 036503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Lilienfeld, O. Towards the Computational Design of Compounds from First Principles. In Many-Electron Approaches In Physics, Chemistry And Mathematics: A Multidisciplinary View; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 169–189. [Google Scholar]
  110. Meng, Y.; Dompablo, M. First principles computational materials design for energy storage materials in lithium ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2009, 2, 589–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Rogl, P.; Podloucky, R.; Wolf, W. DFT calculations: A powerful tool for materials design. J. Phase Equilibria Diffus. 2014, 35, 221–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wu, Z.; Li, L.; Yan, J.; Zhang, X. Materials design and system construction for conventional and new-concept supercapacitors. Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1600382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Jiang, Z.; Xu, B.; Prosandeev, S.; Íñiguez, J.; Xiang, H.; Bellaiche, L. Electrical Energy Storage From First Principles. Front. Electron. Mater. 2022, 2, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Fu, Y.; Singh, D. Density functional methods for the magnetism of transition metals: SCAN in relation to other functionals. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 100, 045126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Shahi, C.; Sun, J.; Perdew, J. Accurate critical pressures for structural phase transitions of group IV, III-V, and II-VI compounds from the SCAN density functional. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 094111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Brandenburg, J.; Bannwarth, C.; Hansen, A.; Grimme, S. B97-3c: A revised low-cost variant of the B97-D density functional method. J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 148, 064104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ceder, G.; Ven, A. Phase diagrams of lithium transition metal oxides: Investigations from first principles. Electrochim. Acta 1999, 45, 131–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Jena, P.; Sun, Q. Theory-guided discovery of novel materials. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 6499–6513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Canfield, P. Design, discovery and growth of novel materials. Philos. Mag. 2012, 92, 2398–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Mroz, A.; Posligua, V.; Tarzia, A.; Wolpert, E.; Jelfs, K. Into the Unknown: How Computation Can Help Explore Uncharted Material Space. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 18730–18743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Jeong, S.; Song, J.; Lee, S. Photoelectrochemical device designs toward practical solar water splitting: A review on the recent progress of BiVO4 and BiFeO3 photoanodes. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Miller, E. White Papers on Materials for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. DOE PEC Working Group. 2013. Available online: https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/articles/white-papers-materials-photoelectrochemical-water-splitting (accessed on 12 December 2022).
  123. Simfukwe, J.; Mapasha, R.; Braun, A.; Diale, M. Ab initio studies of bimetallic-doped 0001 hematite surface for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting. Catalysts 2021, 11, 940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Kruchinina, A. Efficient Density Matrix Methods for Large Scale Electronic Structure Calculations. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. 2019. Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1353081&dswid=2926 (accessed on 12 December 2022).
  125. Cankurtaran, B.; Gale, J.; Ford, M. First principles calculations using density matrix divide-and-conquer within the SIESTA methodology. J. Physics: Condens. Matter 2008, 20, 294208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Hassan, M. Sparse Matrix Diagonalization in the NRLMOL Electronic Structure Code. 2016. Available online: https://scholarworks.utep.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1662&context=open_etd (accessed on 12 December 2022).
  127. Chien, A.; Zimmerman, P. Iterative submatrix diagonalisation for large configuration interaction problems. Mol. Phys. 2018, 116, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Szieberth, D.; Ferrari, A.; D’Arco, P.; Orlando, R. Ab initio modeling of trititanate nanotubes. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 1113–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. D’Arco, P.; Noel, Y.; Demichelis, R.; Dovesi, R. Single-layered chrysotile nanotubes: A quantum mechanical ab initio simulation. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 133, 204701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Szieberth, D.; Ferrari, A.; Noel, Y.; Ferrabone, M. Ab initio modeling of TiO2 nanotubes. Nanoscale 2010, 2, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Quoc, T.; Long, V.; Ţălu, Ş.; Nguyen Trong, D. Molecular dynamics study on the crystallization process of cubic Cu–Au alloy. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Chen, Y.; Wu, J.; Xu, Z.; Shen, W.; Wu, Y.; Corriou, J. Computational assisted tuning of Co-doped TiO2 nanoparticles for ammonia detection at room temperatures. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 601, 154214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Begna, W.; Gurmesa, G.; Geffe, C. Ortho-atomic projector assisted DFT+ U study of room temperature Ferro-and antiferromagnetic Mn-doped TiO2 diluted magnetic semiconductor. Mater. Res. Express 2022, 9, 076102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Hanaor, D.; Assadi, M.; Li, S.; Yu, A.; Sorrell, C. Ab initio study of phase stability in doped TiO2. Comput. Mech. 2012, 50, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ma, J.; He, H.; Liu, F. Effect of Fe on the photocatalytic removal of NOx over visible light responsive Fe/TiO2 catalysts. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2015, 179, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Yalçın, Y.; Kılıç, M.; Çınar, Z. Fe+ 3-doped TiO2: A combined experimental and computational approach to the evaluation of visible light activity. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2010, 99, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Vásquez, G.; Peche-Herrero, M.; Maestre, D.; Alemán, B.; Ramirez-Castellanos, J.; Cremades, A.; Gonzalez-Calbet, J.; Piqueras, J. Influence of Fe and Al doping on the stabilization of the anatase phase in TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 10377–10385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Eidsvaag, H.; Bentouba, S.; Vajeeston, P.; Yohi, S.; Velauthapillai, D. TiO2 as a photocatalyst for water splitting—An experimental and theoretical review. Molecules 2021, 26, 1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Ceotto, M.; Lo Presti, L.; Cappelletti, G.; Meroni, D.; Spadavecchia, F.; Zecca, R.; Leoni, M.; Scardi, P.; Bianchi, C.; Ardizzone, S. About the nitrogen location in nanocrystalline N-doped TiO2: Combined DFT and EXAFS approach. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 1764–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Janczarek, M.; Kowalska, E. Defective dopant-free TiO2 as an efficient visible light-active photocatalyst. Catalysts 2021, 11, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Tao, J.; Guan, L.; Pan, J.; Huan, C.; Wang, L.; Kuo, J. Possible room temperature ferromagnetism of Li-doped anatase TiO2: A first-principles study. Phys. Lett. A 2010, 374, 4451–4454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zhang, Y.; Qi, Y.; Hu, Y.; Liang, P. Defect-induced ferromagnetism in rutile TiO2: A first-principles study. Chin. Phys. B 2013, 22, 127101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Hu, Y.; Li, L.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, S.; Guo, J.; Yang, P. Improving photoelectric properties by using Nb-doping on TiO2. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2022, 803, 139830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Farzaneh, A.; Javidani, M.; Esrafili, M.; Mermer, O. Optical and photocatalytic characteristics of Al and Cu doped TiO2: Experimental assessments and DFT calculations. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2022, 161, 110404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Mathew, S.; Ganguly, P.; Rhatigan, S.; Kumaravel, V.; Byrne, C.; Hinder, S.; Bartlett, J.; Nolan, M.; Pillai, S. Cu-doped TiO2: Visible light assisted photocatalytic antimicrobial activity. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zhang, H.; Wang, M.; Xu, F. Generating oxygen vacancies in Cu2+-doped TiO2 hollow spheres for enhanced photocatalytic activity and antimicrobial activity. Micro Nano Lett. 2020, 15, 535–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Samet, L.; March, K.; Brun, N.; Hosni, F.; Stephan, O.; Chtourou, R. Effect of gamma radiation on the photocatalytic properties of Cu doped titania nanoparticles. Mater. Res. Bull. 2018, 107, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Nishat, S.; Hossain, M.; Mullick, F.; Kabir, A.; Chowdhury, S.; Islam, S.; Hossain, M. Performance analysis of perovskite solar cells using DFT-extracted parameters of metal-doped TiO2 electron transport layer. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 13158–13166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Ghasemi, S.; Rahimnejad, S.; Setayesh, S.; Rohani, S.; Gholami, M. Transition metal ions effect on the properties and photocatalytic activity of nanocrystalline TiO2 prepared in an ionic liquid. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172, 1573–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Lin, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Zhu, C.; Hu, X.; Zhang, X.; Fan, J. Visible-light photocatalytic activity of Ni-doped TiO2 from ab initio calculations. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 133, 746–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Fajariah, N.; Prabowo, W.; Fathurrahman, F.; Melati, A.; Dipojono, H. The investigation of electronic structure of transition metal doped TiO2 for diluted magnetic semiconductor applications: A first principle study. Procedia Eng. 2017, 170, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Zhu, X.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, L.; Wu, J.; Li, S.; Xin, Y.; Su, M.; Cui, Y. Degradation of chemical warfare agents by nickel doped titanium dioxide powders: Enhanced surface activity. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 103678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Holzwarth, N.; Tackett, A.; Matthews, G. A Projector Augmented Wave (PAW) code for electronic structure calculations, Part I: Atompaw for generating atom-centered functions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2001, 135, 329–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Sun, G.; Kürti, J.; Rajczy, P.; Kertesz, M.; Hafner, J.; Kresse, G. Performance of the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) in chemical applications. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 2003, 624, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Xia, Y.; Feng, R.; Wu, C. First-Principles Study on Band Structure of M-Doped TiO2 (M= Ag, Co, Cr, Mn, Sb, Zn). J. Nanoelectron. Optoelectron. 2017, 12, 1181–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Iwaszuk, A.; Nolan, M. Electronic structure and reactivity of Ce-and Zr-doped TiO2: Assessing the reliability of density functional theory approaches. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 12995–13007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Nolan, M.; Iwaszuk, A.; Lucid, A.; Carey, J.; Fronzi, M. Design of novel visible light active photocatalyst materials: Surface modified TiO2. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 5425–5446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Cui, Y.; Wang, Q.; Ren, J.; Liu, B.; Yang, G.; Gao, Y. Geometric and electronic properties of rutile TiO2 with vanadium implantation: A first-principles calculation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2019, 455, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Esfandfard, S.; Elahifard, M.; Behjatmanesh-Ardakani, R.; Kargar, H. DFT study on oxygen-vacancy stability in rutile/anatase TiO2: Effect of cationic substitutions. Phys. Chem. Res. 2018, 6, 547–563. [Google Scholar]
  160. Yao, X.; Wang, X.; Su, L.; Yan, H.; Yao, M. Band structure and photocatalytic properties of N/Zr co-doped anatase TiO2 from first-principles study. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2011, 351, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Panta, R.; Ruangpornvisuti, V. Unusual adsorption behavior of hydrogen molecules on Zr–doped perfect and oxygen-vacancy defective rutile TiO2 (110) surfaces: Periodic DFT study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 32101–32111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Lippens, P.; Chadwick, A.; Weibel, A.; Bouchet, R.; Knauth, P. Structure and chemical bonding in Zr-doped anatase TiO2 nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Belver, C.; Bedia, J.; Montero, M.; Rodriguez, J. Solar photocatalytic purification of water with Ce-doped TiO2/clay heterostructures. Catal. Today 2016, 266, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Matejova, L.; Kocıi, K.; Reli, M.; Capek, L.; Hospodkova, A.; Peikertova, P.; Matej, Z.; Obalova, L.; Wach, A.; Kustrowski, P.; et al. Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic properties of cerium doped TiO2: On the effect of Ce loading on the photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 152, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Albuquerque, A.; Bruix, A.; Sambrano, J.; Illas, F. Theoretical study of the stoichiometric and reduced Ce-doped TiO2 anatase (001) surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 4805–4816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Předota, M.; Zhang, Z.; Fenter, P.; Wesolowski, D.; Cummings, P. Electric double layer at the rutile (110) surface. 2. Adsorption of ions from molecular dynamics and X-ray experiments. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 12061–12072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Shirazi-Fard, S.; Mohammadpour, F.; Zolghadr, A.; Klein, A. Encapsulation and release of doxorubicin from TiO2 nanotubes: Experiment, density functional theory calculations, and molecular dynamics simulation. J. Phys. Chem. B 2021, 125, 5549–5558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Kerisit, S.; Rosso, K.; Yang, Z.; Liu, J. Dynamics of coupled lithium/electron diffusion in TiO2 polymorphs. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 20998–21007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Yildirim, H.; Greeley, J.; Sankaranarayanan, S. Effect of concentration on the energetics and dynamics of Li ion transport in anatase and amorphous TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 15661–15673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Zeydabadi-Nejad, I.; Zolfaghari, N.; Mashhadi, M.; Baghani, M.; Baniassadi, M. Anatase TiO2 nanotubes as Li-ion battery anodes: A molecular dynamics study of Li-ion adsorption on anatase nanotubes. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 47, 101438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Guo, Z.; Prezhdo, O.; Hou, T.; Chen, X.; Lee, S.; Li, Y. Fast energy relaxation by trap states decreases electron mobility in TiO2 nanotubes: Time-domain Ab initio analysis. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 1642–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Lei, L.; Sang, L.; Gao, Y. Pulse electrodeposition of Ag, Cu nanoparticles on TiO2 nanoring/nanotube arrays for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting. Adv. Powder Technol. 2022, 33, 103511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Khorashadizade, E.; Mohajernia, S.; Hejazi, S.; Mehdipour, H.; Naseri, N.; Moradlou, O.; Moshfegh, A.; Schmuki, P. Intrinsically Ru-doped suboxide TiO2 nanotubes for enhanced photoelectrocatalytic H2 generation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 6116–6127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Piskunov, S.; Lisovski, O.; Begens, J.; Bocharov, D.; Zhukovskii, Y.; Wessel, M.; Spohr, E. C-, N-, S-, and Fe-doped TiO2 and SrTiO3 nanotubes for visible-light-driven photocatalytic water splitting: Prediction from first principles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 18686–18696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Zhou, M.; Xue, S.; Feng, Q.; Liang, X.; Wu, W.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, S. Carbon Layers on Pt/TiO2 Induced Dramatic Promotion of Photocatalytic H2 Production: A Combined Experimental and Computation Study. 2022. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4286829 (accessed on 20 December 2022).
  176. Wang, C.; Liu, G.; Cao, R.; Xia, Y.; Wang, Y.; Nie, Y.; He, H. Revealing the wetting mechanism of Li+-doped ionic liquids on the TiO2 surface. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2023, 265, 118211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Lei, L.; Sang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, Y. Interfacial analysis of anatase TiO2 in KOH solution by molecular dynamics simulations and photoelectrochemical experiments. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 3522–3532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Cao, W.; Lu, L.; Huang, L.; Dong, Y.; Lu, X. Molecular behavior of water on titanium dioxide nanotubes: A molecular dynamics simulation study. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2016, 61, 4131–4138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Napagoda, J.; Chen, Q.Y.; Rani, A.; Gunaratne, G.; Chen, D.; Varghese, O.K.; Chu, W.K. A simulation study of mega electron-volt helium ion channeling and shadow effect in titania nanotubes. Mater. Adv. 2023, 4, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Boboriko, N.E.; Dzichenka, Y.U. Molecular dynamics simulation as a tool for prediction of the properties of TiO2 and TiO2: MoO3 based chemical gas sensors. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 855, 157490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. El-Remaily, M.A.E.A.A.A.; Abu-Dief, A.M.; Elhady, O. Green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst with high reusability for synthesis of 1,2-dihydroquinoline derivatives. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 33, e5005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Balayeva, N.O.; Mamiyev, Z.; Dillert, R.; Zheng, N.; Bahnemann, D.W. Rh/TiO2-photocatalyzed acceptorless dehydrogenation of N-heterocycles upon visible-light illumination. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 5542–5553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Nguyen, T.T.; Cao, T.M.; Balayeva, N.O.; Pham, V.V. Thermal treatment of polyvinyl alcohol for coupling MoS2 and TiO2 nanotube arrays toward enhancing photoelectrochemical water splitting performance. Catalysts 2021, 11, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Houska, J.; Mraz, S.; Schneider, J.M. Experimental and molecular dynamics study of the growth of crystalline TiO2. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 073527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Yang, C.; Olsen, T.; Lau, M.L.; Smith, K.A.; Hattar, K.; Sen, A.; Xiong, H. In situ ion irradiation of amorphous TiO2 nanotubes. J. Mater. Res. 2022, 37, 1144–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Kulkarni, M.; Mazare, A.; Park, J.; Gongadze, E.; Killian, M.S.; Kralj, S.; Schmuki, P. Protein interactions with layers of TiO2 nanotube and nanopore arrays: Morphology and surface charge influence. Acta Biomater. 2016, 45, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Chang, Y.; Dong, C.; Zhou, D.; Li, A.; Dong, W.; Cao, X.; Wang, G. Fabrication and Elastic Properties of TiO2 Nanohelix Arrays through a Pressure-Induced Hydrothermal Method. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 14174–14184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Wang, D.; Luo, H.; Liu, L.; Wei, W.; Li, L. Adsorption characteristics and degradation mechanism of metronidazole on the surface of photocatalyst TiO2: A theoretical study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 478, 896–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Mohammadtabar, K.; Guerrero, E.; Garcia, S.R.; Shin, Y.K.; van Duin, A.C.; Strubbe, D.A.; Martini, A. Development and Demonstration of a ReaxFF Reactive Force Field for Ni-Doped MoS2. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2302.01268. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.