Next Article in Journal
Improvement of Corrosion and Wear Resistance of CoCrNiSi0.3 Medium-Entropy Alloy by Sputtering CrN Film
Previous Article in Journal
Stents in Veterinary Medicine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation of Concrete Shrinkage Reducing Additives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on the Mechanical Properties of Cast-In-Situ Phosphogypsum as Building Material for Structural Walls

1
College of Civil Engineering and Architectural, Shaoyang University, Shaoyang 422000, China
2
Space Structures Research Center, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(4), 1481; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16041481
Submission received: 8 January 2023 / Revised: 7 February 2023 / Accepted: 8 February 2023 / Published: 10 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modification and Performance of Novel Cementitious Materials)

Abstract

:
The application of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum as the wall material of building structures can greatly reduce the environmental pollution caused by phosphogypsum. Through the uniaxial compression test of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum specimens, the compressive strength of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum is determined, the constitutive relationship of the material is drawn up, and the elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio of the material are determined. The results show that when the strain of the specimen is close to the peak strain, the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum has brittle properties and rapidly fails, where the failure state is mainly splitting failure. The retarder has a great influence on the peak stress. When the content of the retarder is about 0.3%, the peak stress is 8.6 MPa and the ultimate strain is 2.54 × 10−3, while the peak stress is 2.8 MPa and the ultimate strain is 2.01 × 10−3. The three segment constitutive fitted equations reflect all the characteristics of the compression specimen. When the strength of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum is high, the elastic modulus is also high. When the content of the retarder is about 0.3%, the elastic modulus is 5300 MPa, and when the content of retarder is far greater than 0.3%, the elastic modulus is 2000 MPa. The Poisson’s ratio of material is recommended as 0.19.

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of the economy, developments in architecture are also occurring with each passing day. On the one hand, a large number of new structural forms have emerged from the innovation of building structures [1]; on the other hand, breakthroughs have been made in building materials, especially in the research of composite materials, reinforced polymers and other aspects, and certain achievements have been made [2,3]. The technology of 3D printing has also been applied [4], and the utilization of phosphogypsum resources has been involved in the whole process [5]. China’s phosphate ore resources are mainly distributed in Hubei, Yunnan, Guizhou, Sichuan, Hunan and five other provinces, and it is one of the largest phosphate producing countries in the world [6]. Phosphorous chemical products are widely used in agriculture, the chemical industry, medicine and other fields [7], play an important role in the development of the national economy, and also produce a large amount of phosphogypsum. The vast majority of this phosphogypsum is stacked as waste. The investment needed for storage yards is large, the operation costs are high and they occupy a lot of land resources. The environmental pollution caused by the infiltration of harmful substances, such as soluble P2O5 and fluoride, in phosphogypsum into the soil and water systems is also increasingly prominent [8,9]. However, the comprehensive utilization rate of phosphogypsum is low in China; it is mainly used to produce building materials with low added value. In this regard, the research and development of new technologies and new products of phosphogypsum should be accelerated. If industrial waste gypsum can be modified and comprehensively utilized, it can be turned into treasure. At present, the comprehensive utilization of phosphogypsum is mainly reflected in the following aspects.
First, in the development of new chemical products after reprocessing. For example, in the literature [10], CaO-Al2O3-SiO2 glass-ceramic was prepared from phosphogypsum and studied by differential thermal analysis (DTA) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The work [11] describes a method of successfully preparing high-quality nano-calcium fluoride in aqueous solutions by direct precipitation using calcined phosphogypsum as a raw material. The work [12] introduces a continuous and large-scale method for manufacturing phosphogypsum composites through a reactive extrusion strategy. The work [13] proposed a simple and efficient approach for the high-purity CaSO4·2H2O (DH) whiskers and α-CaSO4·0.5H2O (α-HH) whiskers derived from phosphogypsum (PG). The work [14] studied the effect of different conditions on the preparation of CaS by reducing PG with coal in a fluidized bed. This method not only requires a large initial investment, but also forms new pollutants and faces environmental pollution problems.
Second, in its use as a soil conditioner, where a large number of scholars have carried out relevant research. The literature [15] describes how to industrially process phosphogypsum into organic mineral fertilizer. The literature [16] studied the application of lime and phosphogypsum in weathered soil and determined the long-term (10 year) impact of lime and phosphogypsum on the soil surface of tropical NT soil C and N components; however, the application rate was low.
The third is in the processing of building and decoration materials with phosphogypsum, such as cement retarder and block, gypsum board and wire. The influence of phosphogypsum on cement setting and its applications are described in the literature [17,18,19] over many years, which shows that the preparation of cement retarders is one of the main ways for the resource utilization of phosphogypsum. The works [20,21,22] introduced the early-stage development of several phosphogypsum blocks and the current applications of unburned phosphogypsum permeable bricks. The works [23,24,25,26] introduced new technologies related to the preparation of phosphogypsum rapid wallboard and cast-in-situ phosphogypsum walls. Their application could consume a lot of pollutants and improve construction efficiency. The work [27] compared and analyzed the chemical composition and pretreatment methods of different phosphogypsum, and summarized the use of phosphogypsum in cement retarders, building materials, cement raw materials, concrete raw materials, cementitious materials, fillers and modifiers. However, the consumption of phosphogypsum in these materials is small, which does not meet expectations, and the construction speed of block masonry is also slow.
Fourth, is its use in subgrade engineering and mine backfilling [28,29]. Measures should be taken to solidify phosphogypsum and isolate it from soil to prevent leakage pollution. However, the demand for gypsum in the above fields is limited, and China is rich in natural gypsum reserves, which makes it difficult to achieve the purpose of processing industrial waste. Only by modifying industrial waste phosphogypsum, transforming it into main building materials and expanding its application space, can we expect to achieve the purpose of large-scale treatment of industrial waste.
The literature [7] summarizes the research progress of phosphogypsum in the fields of construction, rare earth extraction, agriculture, chemical industry and biomedical industry; outlines the current problems in the comprehensive utilization research and industrial application of phosphogypsum; and looks forward to the developing trend of basic theory and technology research of high value processing of phosphogypsum in the future. In order to maximize the use of phosphogypsum, turn waste into treasure and save resources, this work uses cast-in-situ phosphogypsum as the building material for structure walls, which can greatly reduce the environmental pollution by phosphogypsum. The strength of phosphogypsum material is an important mechanical parameter in its engineering application and mechanical properties are the main basis for studying phosphogypsum as a building material for structural walls. Therefore, this paper discusses the engineering mix ratio of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum material, synthesizes test pieces to measure the engineering application technical performance indicators, such as the setting time, moisture content and radioactivity of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum, and opens the research on the mechanical properties of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum material. Through compressive tests on phosphogypsum cube and prism specimens, the compressive strength of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum is measured, the partial coefficient of the materials is given, the constitutive relationship of materials is drawn up and the mechanical performance indexes, such as the elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio, of materials are measured for reference in engineering applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

The raw materials of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum are mainly phosphogypsum, phosphorus slag powder, hydrated lime, cement, a retarder and a water reducer. Through preliminary investigations, it was found that the gypsum phase of phosphogypsum produced by different phosphoric acid plants is slightly different. Therefore, the gypsum phase of phosphogypsum raw materials should be tested before application. Figure 1 shows the construction photos of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum walls and treated phosphogypsum. The phosphogypsum and phosphorous slag micropowder were taken from Guizhou Wengfu Phosphorus Industry Group. The gypsum phase composition of phosphogypsum was determined and is shown in Table 1. The specific surface area of the phosphorus slag powder was 380~420 m2/kg and its chemical composition is shown in Table 2. The hydrated lime is commercially available, and the mass fraction of effective CaO was no less than 60%. The cement is P.O325 ordinary Portland cement and the water-reducing agent was polycarboxylic acid, with a concentration of no less than 10%. The retarder was sodium citrate. A JMS-6490LV scanning electron microscope was used to analyze the morphology of the phosphogypsum and phosphorus slag powder. The results are shown in Figure 2, where the scale bar in Figure 2a is 100   μ m , and the scale bar in Figure 2b is 10   μ m . The crystals of hemihydrate gypsum in phosphogypsum are generally parallelogram plates, and the gap between crystals is large. The phosphorus slag micro powder particles are in the shape of “gravel”, with clear edges and corners but no fixed cleavage surface. The results of the X-ray diffraction (SIEMENS D5000 XRD diffractometer, Munich, Germany ) analysis are shown in Figure 3. The phosphorus slag powder is mainly composed of glass, containing a small amount of pseudowollastonite, gunite and apatite. It is a volcanic material with potential activity and can be filled in the gap between hemihydrate gypsum crystals after casting. The acidity of phosphogypsum is neutralized by hydrated lime, the anhydrite is consumed by cement, the water reducer is used to reduce the water consumption, and the retarder is used to delay the setting time after being cast-in-situ.
Taking the total mass mix proportion of phosphogypsum, phosphorous slag micropowder and hydrated lime as 100%, the cement consumption was calculated according to the mass of the mixture of phosphogypsum, phosphorous slag micropowder and hydrated lime. The mixed dry materials were obtained after uniform mixing. The consumption of water reducer and retarder was calculated according to the mass of the mixed dry materials. Considering the possible construction deviation, the material mix proportion shown in Table 3 is proposed, and the water cement ratio is 0.43.

2.2. Technical Parameters of Cast-In-Situ Phosphogypsum

Referring to the Chinese Standard of Building Gypsum GB/T9776 and the Standard of Radionuclide Limit of Building Materials GB6566, 40 mm × 40 mm × 160 mm cast-in-situ phosphogypsum specimens were synthesized and the technical performance indexes such as setting time, water content and radioactivity were evaluated.

2.2.1. Setting Time

Table 4 shows the setting time test results of the phosphogypsum raw materials and cast-in-situ phosphogypsum, in which the amount of retarder added to cast-in-situ phosphogypsum is 0.3%. Compared with the phosphogypsum raw materials, the initial setting time of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum is 7.5 times more than the initial setting time of the raw materials, and the final setting time is about 8 times more than the final setting time of raw materials. The setting time is more than 30 min, which is conducive to on-site pouring.

2.2.2. Moisture Content

The moisture content of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum measured based on 0.3% retarder is shown in Table 5. The moisture content after 5 days at 10 ± 7 °C is 2.6%, so the application of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum to the wall will not affect the building decoration.

2.2.3. Radioactive Detection

The radioactive detection results of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum are shown in Table 6. The radioactive indicators meet the radioactive requirements for main building materials in the Limits of Radionuclides in Building Materials (GB6566). Therefore, the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum can be used for residential buildings.

2.3. Test Device and Loading System

Figure 4 shows a self-made loading device [30]. Four springs with the same stiffness were used as buffer elements. The loading stiffness was 89.7 kN/cm and the unloading stiffness was 92.0 kN/cm. The spring has manufacturing and installation errors; therefore, the load transmission of the loading device has eccentric effects, but it can be considered as a systematic error.
The load sensor is welded by two 63 mm × 5 mm angled steel tips to measure the pressure on the test piece. The total load sensor was made by butt welding the channel steel tips to control the loading speed. The load was continuously applied by a 50 t hydraulic jack, and the loading speed was controlled at 0.5~1.5 MPa/s.
In order to minimize the impact of the loading device on the measurement accuracy, we used a 3 mm-thick steel plate to make two steel hoops to clamp the test pieces up and down, and then installed a longitudinal displacement meter, as shown in Figure 4c. The lateral displacement meter contacts the plexiglass placed on the test piece through a jackscrew installed on the suspension plexiglass sheet. Corresponding to the mounting surface of the longitudinal displacement meter, the longitudinal and transverse strain gauges were, respectively, placed in the middle of the specimen height direction to collect the strain value before the specimen cracks. Two longitudinal and transverse displacement gauges and four longitudinal and transverse strain gauges were used. The arrangement of measuring points is shown in Figure 4c, and the installation of test pieces is shown in Figure 4e.

3. Results

3.1. Test Phenomenon

A total of 18 cube specimens and 38 prism specimens were synthesized according to the mix proportion in Table 3, and an axial compression test was carried out for each. The theoretical side length of the cube specimens was 100 mm, and the theoretical dimensions of the prism specimens was 100 mm × 100 mm × 300 mm. The loading process can be roughly divided into three stages. When the load is 0.13~0.2 times the peak load, the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum between the upper loading plate and the steel hoop will fall off on the surface, indicating that the specimen is in the compaction stage. When the load reached 0.8~0.9 times the peak load, cracks appear on the surface of the specimen. With continued loading, the cracks extended to the upper and lower ends of the test piece and quickly penetrated the test piece, destroying it. The destruction process was relatively sudden and short, indicating that the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum has a high brittleness.
The typical failure state of the cube specimen is shown in Figure 5. The failure state can be generally divided into cone failure and split failure. The split failure surface is mainly in the vertical and 45-degree planes, as shown in Figure 5a. The conical failure state is shown in Figure 5b, and there is no necessary relationship between the failure state and the material mix proportion. The failure state of prismatic specimen is mainly splitting failure, as shown in Figure 6.

3.2. Volumetric Weight of Cast-In-Situ Phosphogypsum

The volumetric weight of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum is mainly affected by the phosphogypsum and phosphorus slag powder. Through a statistical analysis of the test results of the volumetric weight of the test pieces, it is recommended that the volumetric weight of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum be 14.0 kN/m3–15.0 kN/m3 when using the material mix ratio of this project.

3.3. Compressive Strength and Material Partial Factor

According to axial compressive strength tests of the cube and prism specimens, the compressive strength and its statistical parameters of phosphogypsum are shown in Table 7.
In order to analyze the reliability of the bearing capacity of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum walls, an axial compression test of a 1/2 scale wall model was carried out. The section size of the specimen was a × b = 200 mm × 120 mm, 450 mm, 750 mm and 1050 mm in height. See Figure 7 for the test results.
Based on the bearing capacity test results of the wall model and the actual engineering application needs and after the reliability analysis of the bearing capacity of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum wall, it is recommended that the material sub coefficient of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum be taken as γP = 1.9. The standard value and design value of compressive strength of each mix proportion material are shown in Table 8.

3.4. Analysis of Strength Obtaining Mechanism of Cast-in-situ Phosphogypsum

The strength of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum paste was obtained during the material hardening process. After the setting crystals interlace, the friction and cohesion between crystals strengthen the material paste. When setting and hardening stop, the strength will not increase. Phosphorus slag micropowder is a kind of potentially active hydraulic cementing material. Adding phosphorus slag micropowder can delay the hydration time of hemihydrate gypsum in the slurry, increase the fluidity of the cast-in-situ slurry and fill in the gap between dihydrate gypsum crystals to improve the water resistance of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum. The purpose of adding a retarder is to reduce the solubility and dissolution rate of hemihydrate calcium sulfate in phosphogypsum, delay the reduction time of hemihydrate calcium sulfate and thus prolong the setting time of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum paste. The function of cement is to consume anhydrite in phosphogypsum.
The results show that the retarder has a great influence on the compressive strength of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum, and it is suggested that the dose of retarder should be controlled between 0.2% and 0.4%. When the content of anhydrous calcium sulfate in phosphogypsum is high, the mix proportion of cement can be increased accordingly. When the mix proportion of retarder is about 0.3%, the quality mix proportion of cement can be controlled between 2.0% and 5.0%.

3.5. Material Constitutive Relationship of Cast-in-situ Phosphogypsum

In view of the high brittleness of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum, according to the axial compression test results of the prism specimen with a side length of 100 mm × 100 mm × 300 mm, a three-stage stress–strain relationship curve of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum material is proposed using dimensionless coordinates x = ε/ε0 and y = σ/σ0, as shown in Figure 8.
In Figure 8, σ and ε are the stress and strain of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum, respectively, σ0 is the peak stress, ε0 is the peak strain corresponding to σ0, σr is the residual stress, εu is the limit strain corresponding to σr. The statistical control parameters of the constitutive curve are shown in Table 9.
The curve equation can be divided into:
When the dosage of retarder is about 0.3%,
y ( x ) = { 0.395 x + 1.675 x 2 ( 0 x 0.2 ) 0.328 x + 2.344 x 2 1.672 x 3 ( 0.2 x 1.0 ) 1 1 . 008 ( x 1 ) 2 ( x 1.0 ) .
When the dosage of retarder is far greater than 0.3%,
y ( x ) = { 0.378 x + 1.704 x 2 ( 0 x 0.2 ) 0.311 x + 2.38 x 2 1.69 x 3 ( 0.2 x 1.0 ) 1 0 . 933 ( x 1 ) 2 ( x 1.0 ) .
Since the inflection point coordinates of the curves in Formulas (1) and (2) are relatively close, the recommended constitutive relationship of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum in this project is:
y ( x ) = { 0.386 x + 1.689 x 2 ( 0 x 0.2 ) 0.319 x + 2.362 x 2 1.681 x 3 ( 0.2 x 1.0 ) 1 0.975 ( x 1 ) 2   ( x 1.0 ) .
At this time, εu0 = 1.45 and σr0 = 0.7.

3.6. Elastic Modulus and Poisson’s Ratio

Due to the high brittleness of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum, there is almost no linear phase in the constitutive relationship, so the elastic modulus of materials in this project was comprehensively evaluated according to the following three conditions:
  • The average value, Et1, of the secant elastic modulus was calculated based on the stress–strain test results when the strain values are 0.2ε0 and 0.45ε0;
  • The measured results of stress–strain at σ = 0.4σ0 were used to calculate the average value Et2 of secant elastic modulus across the origin;
  • According to the test results, under the condition of no lateral pressure, when ε 0.2 ε 0 , the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum is under load at the compaction stage, and the material constitutive relationship curve has an inflection point between 0.2 ε 0 and ε 0 . Therefore, the inflection point was moved to x = 0.45, linear regression was conducted on the measured stress–strain results between 0.2 ε 0 and 0.45 ε 0 and the average slope of the regression line was approximated as the material elastic modulus, Et3.
The relationship between the three elastic moduli is shown in Figure 9, where α1, α2 and α3 correspond to Et1, Et2 and Et3, respectively. For safety, the material elastic modulus of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum for each mix proportion is given according to the secant elastic modulus, Et2, at the origin, as shown in Table 10. When the content of the retarder is about 0.3%, the elastic modulus is E = 5300 N/mm2 and the variation coefficient is δE = 0.172. When the content of the retarder is much more than 0.3%, the elastic modulus is E = 2000 N/mm2 and the variation coefficient is δE = 0.324.
The Poisson’s ratio was calculated from the previous longitudinal and transverse strain test values when σ = 0.4σ0, and the strain test results when the Poisson’s ratio tends to be stable were used for linear regression. The Poisson’s ratio results of materials for each mix ratio are shown in Table 10. The value of ν changes slightly. All test results were statistically analyzed to obtain a Poisson’s ratio of ν = 0.19 and a coefficient of variation of δν = 0.087.

4. Conclusions

Using cast-in-situ phosphogypsum as a wall material for buildings can consume a large amount of pollutants and improve the efficiency of building construction. The strength of the phosphogypsum material is an important mechanical parameter in engineering applications, and its mechanical properties are the main basis for studying phosphogypsum as a wall material. Through completing relevant tests on cast-in-situ phosphogypsum specimens, the results show that:
(1)
The failure of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum uniaxial compression specimens is brittle failure, manifesting in a splitting failure state. The main cracks include both vertical cracks and oblique cracks.
(2)
The descending section of the measured stress strain curve of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum is relatively short, and the amount of retarder added has a great impact on the strength of the material. Generally, when the amount of retarder added is about 0.3%, the peak stress is 8.6 MPa and the limit strain is 2.54 × 10−3. When the content of retarder is much more than 0.3%, the peak stress is 2.8 MPa and the limit strain is 2.01 × 10−3.
(3)
The constitutive relation curve of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum is composed of an ascending section and a descending section. The Formula (2) proposed in this paper fits the test results of ascending section well, but the fit of the descending section is poor.
(4)
In general, when the content of retarder is about 0.3%, the elastic modulus of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum is E = 5300 MPa, and when the content of retarder is far greater than 0.3%, the elastic modulus is E = 2000 MPa.
(5)
The test results show that there is no necessary relationship between the Poisson’s ratio and the strength of the cast-in-situ phosphogypsum. It is suggested that the Poisson’s ratio should be 0.19.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z. and Q.Y.; methodology, Q.Y. and H.Z.; validation, T.L. and Q.Y.; formal analysis, Q.Y. and Z.X.; investigation, C.D.; resources, H.Z.; data curation, Q.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.Y. and H.Z.; writing—review and editing, Q.Y.; funding acquisition, Q.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Key Projects of Hunan Shaoyang Science and Technology Plan, grant number 2021GZ026.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Throughout the writing of this dissertation, I have received a great deal of support and assistance. I would first like to thank my tutor, Zhang Huagang, whose expertise was invaluable in formulating the research questions and methodology. Your insightful feedback pushed me to sharpen my thinking and brought my work to a higher level. I would particularly like to acknowledge my team member, Wu Qin, for their wonderful collaboration and patient support. I would also like to thank Wu Bang for their valuable guidance throughout my studies. In addition, I would like to thank my parents for their wise counsel and sympathetic ear. You are always there for me. Finally, I could not have completed this dissertation without the support of my friends, Ze Xiang, Taoyong Liu and Changqing Deng, who provided stimulating discussions as well as happy distractions to rest my mind outside of my research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, Y.; Yang, J.; Sun, R.; Ma, K. Development status and engineering practice of new concrete spatial grid structure. J. Guizhou Univ. 2021, 38, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jahangir, H.; Soleymani, A.; Esfahani, M.R. Investigating the confining effect of steel reinforced polymer and grout composites on compressive behavior of square concrete columns. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 2022, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, C.Q.; Chen, S.; Huang, D.M.; Huang, Q.C.; Li, X.Q.; Shui, Z.H. Safe environmentally friendly reuse of red mud modified phosphogypsum composite cementitious material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 368, 130348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Muñoz, I.; Alonso Madrid, J.; Menéndez Muñiz, M.; Uhart, M.; Canou, J.; Martin, C.; Fabritius, M.; Calvo, L.; Poudelet, L.; Cardona, R.; et al. Life cycle assessment of integrated additive–subtractive concrete 3D printing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 112, 2149–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dong, Z.; Zhai, Y.; Ren, Z.; Yan, B. Research progress in the resource utilization of phosphogypsum building materials. Inorg. Salt Ind. 2022, 54, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xue, T.; Xiong, X.; Tian, S. Discussion on the main phosphate ore concentration areas and their resource potential in China. Chem. Miner. Geol. 2011, 33, 9–20. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, J.; Xie, W.; Dong, X.; Yang, H. Research progress in the comprehensive utilization of phosphogypsum materials. Introd. Mater. 2023, 16, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  8. Xu, J.; Shao, L.; Hou, H.; Li, J.; Liu, J.; Huang, M.; Wang, X.; Lu, J. Research status of environmental impact in the context of comprehensive utilization of phosphogypsum. J. Min. Sci. 2023, 8, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Plyatsuk, L.; Balintova, M.; Chernysh, Y.; Demcak, S.; Holub, M.; Yakhnenko, E. Influence of phosphogypsum dump on the soil ecosystem in the sumy region (Ukraine). Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, H.; Yang, J.; Yang, J.; Ma, L.; Jiang, M.; Li, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Li, Y.; Cao, Z. Preparation of glass-ceramics from phosphogypsum. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 199, 042044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, L. Preparation of calcium fluoride using phosphogypsum by orthogonal experiment. Open Chem. 2018, 16, 864–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ran, J.; Su, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Liu, K.; Liu, Z.; Hu, Y.; Sun, L.; Jiang, D. Continuous, large-scale, and high proportion of bioinspired phosphogypsum composites via reactive extrusion. Materials 2021, 14, 5601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lin, Y.; Sun, H.; Peng, T.; Ding, W.; Li, X.; Xiao, S. A simple and efficient method for preparing high-purity α- CaSO4·0.5H2O whiskers with phosphogypsum. Materials 2022, 15, 4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ma, D.; Wang, Q. Experimental study of CaS preparation from lignite-reduced phosphogypsum in a fluidized bed. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2022, 98, 756–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Matveeva, V.A.; Smirnov, Y.D.; Suchkov, D.V. Industrial processing of phosphogypsum into organomineral fertilizer. Environ. Geochem. Heal. 2021, 44, 1605–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. da Costa, C.H.M.; Wander, M.M.; Crusciol, C.A.C.; Ugarte, C.; Rigon, J.P.G.; Soratto, R.P.; Calonego, J.C. Long-term effects of lime and phosphogypsum on soil carbon and nitrogen and physical attributes under tropical no-till. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2021, 85, 328–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Potgieter, J.; Potgieter, S.; McCrindle, R.; Strydom, C. An investigation into the effect of various chemical and physical treatments of a South African phosphogypsum to render it suitable as a set retarder for cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2003, 33, 1223–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shen, W.; Gan, G.; Dong, R.; Chen, H.; Tan, Y.; Zhou, M. Utilization of solidified phosphogypsum as Portland cement retarder. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2012, 14, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, B.; Li, L.; Chen, X.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, M. Modification of phosphogypsum using circulating fluidized bed fly ash and carbide slag for use as cement retarder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 338, 127630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kumar, S. Fly ash-lime-phosphogypsum hollow blocks for walls and partitions. Build. Environ. 2003, 38, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dong, F.; Liu, X.; Li, M. Development of phosphogypsum hollow blocks. New Build. Mater. 2004, 9, 58–59. [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, Z. Preparation and performance of modified phosphogypsum unburned permeable brick. Highway Traffic Sci. Technol. 2022, 39, 49–54. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen, D.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Liu, L.; Dong, G. Experimental study on the preparation of wall grouting materials from phosphogypsum. Concr. Cem. Prod. 2013, 9, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bandgar, G.S.; Kumthekar, M.B. A Study on feasibility of rapid wall panel for building construction. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2016, 3, 1026–1031. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, Y.; Dai, S.; Weng, W.; Huang, J.; Su, Y.; Cai, Y. Stress-strain relationship and seismic performance of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2017, 15 (Suppl. 1), 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Li, Y.; Dai, S.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, J.; Su, Y.; Ma, B. Preparation and thermal insulation performance of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum wall. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2018, 16 (Suppl. 1), 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xiantao, Q.; Yihu, C.; Haowei, G.; Qisheng, H.; Zhihao, L.; Jing, X.; Bo, H.; Zeyu, Z.; Rong, L. Resource utilization and development of phosphogypsum-based materials in civil engineering. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 387, 135858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Degirmenci, N. The using of waste phosphogypsum and natural gypsum in adobe stablization. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22, 1220–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Peng, B.; Yang, Z.; Yang, Z.; Peng, J. Effects of pH and fineness of phosphogypsum on mechanical performance of cement–phosphogypsum-stabilized soil and classification for road-used phosphogypsum. Coatings 2020, 10, 1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, Q.; Zhang, H.; Jia, X.; Huang, Z. Design and stiffness test analysis of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum mechanical property test device. J. Guizhou Univ. 2014, 31, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cast-in-situ phosphogypsum wall pouring and phosphogypsum samples.
Figure 1. Cast-in-situ phosphogypsum wall pouring and phosphogypsum samples.
Materials 16 01481 g001
Figure 2. SME photos of raw materials.
Figure 2. SME photos of raw materials.
Materials 16 01481 g002
Figure 3. XRD atlas of raw materials.
Figure 3. XRD atlas of raw materials.
Materials 16 01481 g003
Figure 4. Test equipment and measuring point arrangement.
Figure 4. Test equipment and measuring point arrangement.
Materials 16 01481 g004
Figure 5. Typical failure state of cube specimen.
Figure 5. Typical failure state of cube specimen.
Materials 16 01481 g005
Figure 6. Typical failure state of prism specimen.
Figure 6. Typical failure state of prism specimen.
Materials 16 01481 g006
Figure 7. Wall axial compression test.
Figure 7. Wall axial compression test.
Materials 16 01481 g007
Figure 8. Fitting curve of constitutive relation.
Figure 8. Fitting curve of constitutive relation.
Materials 16 01481 g008
Figure 9. Comparison of elastic modulus.
Figure 9. Comparison of elastic modulus.
Materials 16 01481 g009
Table 1. Gypsum composition of phosphogypsum.
Table 1. Gypsum composition of phosphogypsum.
Dihydrate Gypsum/%β-Hemihydrate/%Anhydrite/%
SolubilityDifficult Capacitive
0.7887.612.452.12
Table 2. Chemical compositions of phosphorite slag (%).
Table 2. Chemical compositions of phosphorite slag (%).
SiO2Fe2O3Al2O3CaOMgOP2O5CaF2
42.351.673.5245.361.731.461.07
Table 3. Mass proportion of materials of specimens.
Table 3. Mass proportion of materials of specimens.
Material Composition/%Mix Ratio Number
123456789
Phosphogypsum757575808080858585
Phosphorus slag powder202020171717999
Slaked lime555333666
Cement521052105210
Water reducing admixture0.60.81.00.81.00.61.00.60.8
Retarder1.00.31.51.51.00.30.2–0.41.51.0
Table 4. Setting time/min.
Table 4. Setting time/min.
SpecimenInitial SetFinal Set
Phosphogypsum6.07.0
Cast-in-situ phosphogypsum45.055.0
Table 5. Moisture content of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum.
Table 5. Moisture content of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum.
Initial Moisture Content/%1d Moisture Content/%3d Moisture Content/%5d Moisture Content/%Apparent State
28.518.34.72.6Smooth
Table 6. Radioactive Detection of Cast-in-situ Phosphogypsum.
Table 6. Radioactive Detection of Cast-in-situ Phosphogypsum.
ProjectTest Data and Standard Values
226Ra/Bq.kg−1232Th/Bq.kg−140K/Bq.kg−1Internal Exposure Index/IRaExternal Exposure Index/Iγ
Phosphorus building gypsum wall grouting material52.3118.62243.210.310.34
Technical requirements for main building materials---<1.0<1.0
Table 7. Compressive strength and its coefficient of variation.
Table 7. Compressive strength and its coefficient of variation.
Mix Ratio NumberCubePrismaticfpu,10/fpu
fpu/MPaδfpufpu,10/MPaδfpu,10
13.30.0822.80.1120.848
29.60.0998.70.1070.906
32.70.098---
43.10.0662.40.4420.774
54.40.0812.60.2820.591
610.40.0519.30.1730.894
710.30.0728.50.0520.825
82.70.0712.10.0430.778
94.20.1033.50.1210.833
Table 8. Standard value and design value of material compressive strength.
Table 8. Standard value and design value of material compressive strength.
Mix Ratio Number123456789
fpk/MPa1.85.31.51.72.45.75.71.52.3
fp/MPa0.92.80.80.91.33.03.00.81.2
Table 9. Statistics of the control parameters of the stress–strain curve.
Table 9. Statistics of the control parameters of the stress–strain curve.
Dosage of Retarderσ0/MPaδσ0σr/MPaδσrσr0ε0/10−6δε0εu/10−6δεuεu/ε0
Far more than 0.3%2.80.2351.90.3040.6814300.10920100.1581.41
About 0.3%8.60.0725.70.1600.6616900.09325400.1421.50
Table 10. Elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum.
Table 10. Elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio of cast-in-situ phosphogypsum.
Mix Ratio Number123456789
Elastic modulus E/N.mm−2220056001100200016005300520019002000
Poisson’s ratio, ν0.160.200.180.180.180.200.200.20.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, Q.; Xiang, Z.; Liu, T.; Deng, C.; Zhang, H. Study on the Mechanical Properties of Cast-In-Situ Phosphogypsum as Building Material for Structural Walls. Materials 2023, 16, 1481. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16041481

AMA Style

Yang Q, Xiang Z, Liu T, Deng C, Zhang H. Study on the Mechanical Properties of Cast-In-Situ Phosphogypsum as Building Material for Structural Walls. Materials. 2023; 16(4):1481. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16041481

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Qizhu, Ze Xiang, Taoyong Liu, Changqing Deng, and Huagang Zhang. 2023. "Study on the Mechanical Properties of Cast-In-Situ Phosphogypsum as Building Material for Structural Walls" Materials 16, no. 4: 1481. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16041481

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop