Next Article in Journal
Study of the Structural, Morphological, Strength and Shielding Properties of CuBi2O4 Films Obtained by Electrochemical Synthesis
Next Article in Special Issue
Microstructural Characteristics and Material Failure Mechanism of SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn Alloy
Previous Article in Journal
Electrospun PCL Wires Loaded with Vancomycin on Zirconium Substrate
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of High Temperature and Thermal Cycle of 4043 Al Alloy Manufactured through Continuous Casting Direct Rolling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phase Stability and Slag-Induced Destabilization in MnO2 and CeO2-Doped Calcia-Stabilized Zirconia

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea
2
Reliability Assessment Center, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
3
Advanced Materials Engineering, Dong-Eui University, Busan 47340, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Materials 2023, 16(22), 7240; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16227240
Submission received: 1 November 2023 / Revised: 12 November 2023 / Accepted: 17 November 2023 / Published: 20 November 2023

Abstract

:
MnO2 and CeO2 were doped to improve the corrosion resistance of CSZ (calcia-stabilized zirconia), and we studied the phase formation, mechanical properties, and corrosion resistance by molten mold flux. The volume fraction of the monoclinic phase gradually decreased as the amount of MnO2 doping increased. The splitting phenomenon of the t(101) peak was observed in 2Mn_CSZ, and in 4Mn_CSZ, it was completely split, forming a cubic phase. The relative density increased and the monoclinic phase decreased as the doping amount increased, leading to an increase in Vickers hardness and flexural strength. However, in 3Mn_CSZ and 4Mn_CSZ, where cubic phase formation occurred, the tetragonal phase decreased, leading to a reduction in these properties. MnO2-doped CSZ exhibited a larger fraction of the monoclinic phase compared to the original CSZ after the corrosion test, indicating worsened corrosion resistance. These results are attributed to the predominant presence of Mn3+ and Mn2+ forms, rather than the Mn4+ form, which has a smaller basicity difference with SiO2, and due to the low melting point. The monoclinic phase fraction decreased as the doping amount of CeO2 increased in CeO2-doped CSZ, but the rate of decrease was lower compared to MnO2-doped CSZ. The monoclinic phase decreased as the doping amount increased, but the Vickers hardness and flexural strength showed a decreasing trend due to the low relative density. The destabilization behavior of Ca in SEM-EDS images before and after corrosion was difficult to identify due to the presence of Ca in the slag, and the destabilization behavior of Ce due to slag after corrosion was not observed. In the XRD data of the specimen surface after the corrosion test, the fraction of the monoclinic phase increased compared to before the test but showed a lower monoclinic phase fraction compared to CSZ. It is believed that CeO2 has superior corrosion resistance compared to CaO because Ce predominantly exists in the form of Ce4+, which has a smaller difference in basicity within the zirconia lattice.

1. Introduction

The submerged entry nozzle (SEN) is a functional refractory material that plays a crucial role in the final stage of continuous casting, situated between the tundish and the mold [1]. It prevents contact between the molten metal and air while ensuring a steady flow of molten metal into the mold and stabilizing the flow of the molten metal [2]. The SEN must possess excellent thermal shock resistance to withstand rapid temperature changes and sufficient strength to bear the pressure of the molten metal. Additionally, it requires high corrosion resistance and wear resistance against molten metal and slag for prolonged usage [3,4]. The body of the SEN primarily utilizes Al2O3-C-based refractories, but in the areas that contact slag, ZrO2-C-based refractories are used due to their superior corrosion resistance and abrasion resistance [5]. In ZrO2-C-based refractories, ZrO2 is chemically stable, resistant to forming low-melting-point compounds, and has excellent thermal spalling resistance. Graphite minimizes thermal shock by providing excellent thermal conductivity and reduces contact and reactions between slag and the refractory material due to its low wettability with slag [6]. However, ZrO2-C-based refractories are known to be eroded by slag [7]. It is commonly understood that erosion occurs due to the flow at the interface between slag and molten metal [8,9]. The interface between slag and molten metal fluctuates, causing the ZrO2-C refractory to alternately come into contact with the molten metal and slag. When the molten metal rises, graphite dissolves into the molten metal, exposing the surface of ZrO2. When the molten metal descends, ZrO2 is exposed to the slag without graphite, and it is known that ZrO2 dissolves into the slag, leading to erosion. The dissolution of ZrO2 by the slag is known to be the rate-determining step, given the rapid dissolution of graphite into the molten metal in this erosion mechanism [10]. However, this mechanism explains erosion at the interface between slag and molten metal, but it does not explain erosion that occurs further up from the interface. Therefore, Hauck and Potschke proposed a localized corrosion mechanism due to interfacial tension gradients [11]. This mechanism suggests that slag covers ZrO2 due to surface tension, forming a slag film and eroding ZrO2. In this manner, the submerged entry nozzle is explained by complex erosion mechanisms, and ultimately, since the erosion rate of ZrO2 determines the life of the submerged entry nozzle, research is being conducted to reduce the erosion rate of ZrO2 and to decrease the graphite content [12]. However, the reduction in graphite content causes a lower thermal conductivity in ZrO2-C refractories, which can lead to a decrease in thermal shock resistance. Therefore, there is a need to secure thermal shock resistance through the improvement of the mechanical properties of zirconia.
Partially stabilized zirconia (PSZ), which exhibits excellent thermal shock resistance due to transformation toughening as cubic or tetragonal phases transform to the monoclinic phase, is used for submerged entry nozzles [13,14]. PSZ is obtained by stabilizing high-temperature phases at room temperature by adding stabilizers such as MgO, CaO, and Y2O3. Primarily, CaO-stabilized zirconia (CSZ) is used for submerged entry nozzles [15]. However, CSZ has issues with corrosion caused by slag, and the destabilization of zirconia due to reactions with slag is known to be the main cause. SiO2 present in the slag reacts with CaO to form a low-melting-point glass, and it is known to transform cubic or tetragonal phases of zirconia into the monoclinic phase, breaking up the zirconia grains [16,17]. To improve the durability of submerged entry nozzles, it is necessary to address the destabilization of zirconia caused by slag, and progress is being made in enhancing corrosion resistance through co-doping.
Corrosion of refractories by slag is related to the basicity and viscosity of the slag, and Hirata et al. have presented an experimental equation to predict the corrosion rate of ceramic materials by slag [18].
log D = 0.18 log B 0.55 log η + C
where D is the depth of corrosion (μm), B is the basicity gap between slag and ceramics, η is the viscosity of the slag, and C is a constant that varies depending on the corrosion conditions. The basicity gap can be calculated through the B parameter proposed by Morinaga et al., estimated as follows [19]:
B = Σ n i B i
B i = r i + 1.40 2 Z i × 2 0.405 1.023
where n i represents the fraction of cation i for all cations, and r i and Z i represent the ionic radius and charge of cation i , respectively. This parameter can represent the basicity of completely molten oxides, assuming that the bond between cations and anions in the slag is ionic. From this equation, we can deduce that the basicity increases as the ionic radius increases and the charge decreases, and to reduce reactivity with SiO2, it is necessary to dope with acidic elements.
In this study, we aimed to enhance the corrosion resistance of CaO-stabilized zirconia (CSZ) by doping it with acidic CeO2 and MnO2 and analyzing the resultant mechanical properties. XRD analysis was performed to investigate the changes in crystal structure due to doping, including variations in monoclinic phase fraction and peak shifts/corrosion tests were conducted to assess the corrosion resistance of CeO2 and MnO2-doped CSZ and analyze the associated destabilization behavior.

2. Experimental Procedures

CaO-stabilized zirconia (CSZ) is a commercial refractory powder, and its chemical composition is listed in Table 1. MnO2 (Junsei Chemical Co., Ltd., Kanto, Japan, 90%) powder and CeO2 (Kanto Chemical Co., Inc., Tokyo, Japan, 99.99%) were used as dopants. The particle size distribution characteristics and SEM images of the powders are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. MnO2-doped CSZ and CeO2-doped CSZ were prepared as shown in Table 2. MnO2 and CeO2 were introduced into CSZ powders by the mechanical mixing method. The mixed powders were ball milled in ethanol for 24 h. Mixed solutions were then dried at 100 °C using a dry oven, calcinated for 24 h using a dry oven, and then calcined at 1200 °C for 2 h in a box-type electric furnace. Powder was uniaxially pressed at 3 ton/m2 to produce a 20 mm disk specimen, and the green body was sintered at 5 °C/min to various temperatures (1300–1600 °C) for 4 h. The bar-type specimens (3.5 mm × 4.5 mm × 36 mm) were uniaxially pressed at 3.2 ton/m2 in a steel die and heated up to 1600 °C with a heating rate of 5 °C/min for 4 h.
A corrosion test was performed using slag powder, and the composition of the slag powder is indicated in Table 3. 0.7 g of the slag powder was formed into pellets using a cylindrical 15 mm mold with a pressure of 1 ton/m2. The slag pellets were then placed on sintered zirconia specimens and heat-treated in a box furnace at 1550 °C for 10 h in an air atmosphere.
The densities of sintered pellets were determined using the Archimedes’ method, which involved immersing the samples in distilled water. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the specimens were collected at room temperature using a step scan procedure (2θ = 10–90°, with a step interval of 0.02°) and Cu-Kα radiation on a Rigaku Ultima-IV XRD instrument (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at the Converging Materials Core Facility. The XRD data obtained for phase analysis was analyzed using Rigaku SmartLab Studio II software version 4.3.101.0.
Monoclinic phase was determined from the integrated intensity of the X-ray diffraction scan based on ISO 5803 [20].
X = I 1 11 m + I ( 111 ) m I 1 11 m + I 111 M + I ( 101 ) t
X = I 1 11 m + I ( 111 ) m I 1 11 m + I 111 M + I t t c
Formular (4) is for a two-phase system (monoclinic and tetragonal phases), and Formular (5) is for multi-phase system (a mixture of monoclinic, tetragonal, and cubic). X is an integrated intensity ratio. Where I 1 11 m and I ( 111 ) m refer to the integral intensity of the X-ray diffraction pattern of monoclinic. The I ( 101 ) t refers to the integral intensity from the (101) plane of tetragonal and I t t c is total integrated intensity of tetragonal phase (101) and cubic phase (111) reflection. Calculate the volume fraction of the monoclinic phase using Formular (6):
f m = P X 1 + P 1 X
f m is the volume fraction of the monoclinic phase and the P is the intensity factor. In the monoclinic-tetragonal ZrO2 system, P = 1.219 is used, while in the multiphase system, P = 1.265 is used.
A nano indenter (FISCHERSCOPE, HM2000, Sindelfingen, Germany) was used to measure the Vickers hardness. Flexural strength was measured with the three-point bending method using test specimens measuring 3.5 mm × 4.5 mm × 36 mm. The SEM images of the samples were obtained by using a scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., JSM-IT800, Tokyo, Japan).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 presents the particle size analysis (PSA) data of the powders. CSZ and MnO2 consisted of coarser particles with average diameters of 50.33 μm and 48.99 μm, respectively, while CeO2 comprised finer particles with an average diameter of 8.90 μm. This trend is well illustrated in Figure 2, where CSZ and MnO2 exhibit non-uniform, coarse single particles. Figure 1d,e presents the PSA data of 2Mn_CSZ and 2Ce_CSZ powders, which were wet ball milled and calcined at 1200 °C, demonstrating a reduction in average diameter compared to the original CSZ. Figure 2d,e displays smaller particle sizes compared to the original CSZ. Additionally, the average particle diameter of 2Ce_CSZ, which is doped with the relatively finer CeO2, was 28.16 μm, smaller than that of 2Mn_CSZ at 39.61 μm.
Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns of MnO2-doped CSZ sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h. In CSZ, both the monoclinic phase (ICSD 98-006-0900, space group of P1 21/c 1) and the tetragonal phase (ICSD 98-007-0014, space group of P 42/nmc) were observed, with the monoclinic volume fraction reaching 33.7%. As shown in Figure 3b, the monoclinic peak gradually decreased with the increase in MnO2 doping amount. The monoclinic volume fraction was 19.7% in 1Mn_CSZ, while the monoclinic phase was not observed in 3Mn_CSZ and 4Mn_CSZ. In 2Mn_CSZ, the phenomenon of peak splitting at the t(101) peak was observed, and as the doping amount increased, the peak splitting became more distinct. In 4Mn_CSZ, complete splitting was confirmed, and the formation of a cubic phase (ICSD 98-010-5553, space group Fm-3m) was verified through Figure 2c, with the cubic phase fractions in 3Mn_CSZ and 4Mn_CSZ being determined to be 4.6% and 9.1%, respectively (Table 4). In addition, a higher angle shift was observed with the increase in doping amount, suggesting a change in the valence state of Mn during doping. Clavel et al. reported that when the content of Mn is less than 1.4%, Mn exists mainly in the form of Mn2+ (96 Å) in zirconia, which is larger than Zr4+ (84 Å). However, as the Mn content increases, Mn mainly exists as Mn3+ (64.5 Å), which has a smaller ionic radius than Zr4+, inducing lattice distortion [21]. Thus, the doped Mn mainly forms a substitutional solid solution as Mn3+, creating oxygen vacancies and stabilizing the monoclinic phase into tetragonal and cubic phases [22].
Figure 4a shows the graph of the relative density changes of MnO2-doped CSZ with temperature. The relative density appearing in the 70% range is believed to be attributed to the larger particle size of the zirconia refractory powder, as shown in Figure 1a, resulting in incomplete densification. In the SEM images of the specimen sintered at 1600 °C (Supplementary Figure S1), it was difficult to observe microstructural changes due to density changes because the overall density was low. It was observed that the relative density increased with the doping of MnO2, while CSZ displayed a relative density of 75.16% at 1600 °C, 4Mn-doped CSZ exhibited a higher relative density of 77.68%. MnO2, having a low melting point of 535 °C, acted as an additive, enhancing the relative density [23]. Figure 4b presents the Vickers hardness and flexural strength of MnO2-doped CSZ. As MnO2 was doped, the Vickers hardness steadily increased from 632.12 Hv (CSZ) to 752.12 Hv (2Mn_CSZ), and the flexural strength increased from 423.25 MPa (CSZ) to 511.23 MPa (2Mn_CSZ). These results are attributed to the increase in relative density and the decrease in monoclinic phase fraction due to MnO2 doping [24]. However, as the doping amount of MnO2 increased further, the mechanical properties decreased. The Vickers hardness dropped to 732.26 Hv (3Mn_CSZ) and 662.35 Hv (4Mn_CSZ), and the flexural strength decreased to 505.89 MPa (3Mn_CSZ) and 453.25 MPa (4Mn_CSZ). Despite the increase in relative density, the decrease in mechanical properties is considered to be related to the formation of the cubic phase. The formation of the cubic phase reduces the tetragonal phase, diminishing the transformation toughening effect arising from the martensitic phase transformation from tetragonal to monoclinic phases [25].
Figure 5 shows SEM-EDS images of 2Mn_CSZ magnified 250 times before and after corrosion, where the specimen sintered at 1600 °C was subjected to corrosion in slag at 1550 °C for 10 h. In the pre-corrosion surface image of 2Mn_CSZ (Figure 5a), it is apparent that full densification has not occurred due to the coarse particle size, and EDS scanning revealed that Ca and Mn were uniformly dispersed without agglomeration. Figure 5b shows the surface of 2Mn_CSZ after corrosion, and the EDS scans of Ca and Si indicate that residues of slag remain on the surface. The presence of slag residues made it difficult to observe the destabilization behavior due to the leaching of Mn and Ca from 2Mn_CSZ caused by the slag. The post-corrosion cross-sectional SEM-EDS images of 2Mn_CSZ (Figure 5d) reveal that the slag has penetrated the interior due to the high porosity of the specimen, making it impossible to evaluate the internal corrosion resistance through the assessment of the penetration depth of the slag.
Figure 6 shows the XRD data of the MnO2-doped CSZ specimens’ surface after corrosion. After the corrosion, only the tetragonal and monoclinic peaks were observed in MnO2-doped CSZ, while no slag peaks were detected. This is due to the formation of a glass phase during the rapid cooling process following the corrosion test [26]. In 4Mn_CSZ, although a cubic peak was initially observed, no cubic phase was detected after corrosion. As indicated in Table 5, the cubic volume fraction decreased from 9.1% before corrosion to 0% after corrosion, which is considered to be a phase transition caused by destabilization. In Figure 6c, it can be seen that the CSZ has shifted to a higher angle after corrosion (from 30.34° to 30.52°), indicating that Ca2+ ions, which are larger than Zr4+ ions, have leached out from the lattice due to reactions with the slag. Before the corrosion test, the MnO2-doped CSZ showed a low-angle shift due to the doping of smaller Mn3+ and Mn4+ ions, positioning the t(101) at a lower angle compared to CSZ. In particular, the 1Mn_CSZ exhibited the largest shift from 30.36° before corrosion to 30.66° after corrosion. However, after the corrosion test, the t(101) position was at a higher angle than that in the undoped case. These results corresponded with the monoclinic phase fraction results, with 1Mn_CSZ showing the highest monoclinic phase fraction of 42.7% after corrosion. As the amount of MnO2 doping increased, the angle shift to a higher angle after corrosion decreased, with the 4Mn_CSZ shifting from 30.40° before corrosion to 30.46° after corrosion. These results suggest that Mn, being smaller than the zirconia ions, has also leached out from the zirconia lattice due to destabilization, resulting in a combined effect of a lower angle shift due to Mn leaching and a higher angle shift due to Ca leaching. All specimens with Mn doping showed a higher fraction of the monoclinic phase compared to the original CSZ, indicating a decrease in corrosion resistance. As mentioned earlier, the corrosion of stabilized zirconia by slag is primarily due to the leaching of stabilizers by SiO2 [16,17]. The B i values of SiO2 and CaO calculated using Equation (3) are 0.470 and 1.613, respectively. Since SiO2 and CaO not only form a glass phase but also have a large difference in basicity, a significant reaction can be expected. The B i values for MnO2, Mn2O3, and MnO are 0.536, 0.796, and 1.563, respectively. Although the B i of MnO2 does not differ significantly from that of SiO2, it is expected that the reaction will be minimal. However, since Mn in the zirconia lattice mainly exists in the form of Mn3+, there is a difference in basicity, leading to potential instability. Additionally, the melting points of MnO2 and Mn2O3 are 535 °C and 940 °C, respectively, which are significantly lower than the 2572 °C of CaO, suggesting that leaching into the slag would be easier.
Figure 7 presents the XRD patterns of CeO2-doped CSZ, which was sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h. Both monoclinic and tetragonal phases were observed in the CeO2-doped CSZ. As seen in Figure 7b, the monoclinic peak gradually decreased with the increase of CeO2 doping, resulting in a decrease in the monoclinic volume fraction from 29.5% in 1Ce_CSZ to 21.8% in 4Ce_CSZ (Table 6). In Figure 7c, a lower angle shift occurred with the increase in doping amount, indicating that the lattice expanded due to the doping of Ce4+ (97 Å), which is larger than Zr4+ (84 Å) [27]. When compared to MnO2-doped CSZ, the rate of decrease in the monoclinic phase was lower. This is because when MnO2 is doped, it mainly forms a substitutional solid solution in the form of Mn3+ (64.5 Å), creating oxygen vacancies to maintain charge neutrality, leading to a significant stabilization effect due to the formation of these vacancies [28]. On the other hand, when CeO2 is doped, both Ce4+ and Ce3+ exist, predominantly in the form of Ce4+. Thus, stabilization primarily occurs due to lattice stress caused by the ionic radius difference between Zr4+ and Ce4+, resulting in a weaker effect on stabilizing the tetragonal phase compared to MnO2 [29].
Figure 8a illustrates the graph of relative density changes in CeO2-doped CSZ, indicating a trend of decreasing relative density with increasing amounts of CeO2 doping. The SEM images of the specimen sintered at 1600 °C (Supplementary Figure S2) show that, due to the overall low density, it was challenging to observe microstructural changes associated with density changes. The relative density gradually decreased from 75.1% (CSZ) to 72.23% (4Ce_CSZ) at 1600 °C, and this result is attributed to the fact that CeO2 generates a low sinterability system [30]. Figure 8b illustrates the Vickers hardness and flexural strength of CeO2-doped CSZ. The Vickers hardness decreased from 612.57 Hv (1Ce_CSZ) to 586.35 Hv (4Ce_CSZ), and the flexural strength also reduced from 412.63 MPa (1Ce_CSZ) to 392.22 MPa. Even though an increase in tetragonal phase was observed with an increase in CeO2 doping, the sinterability deteriorated, leading to a decrease in mechanical properties.
Figure 9 shows the SEM-EDS images of 2Ce_CSZ magnified 250 times before and after corrosion. In the pre-corrosion surface image of 2Ce_CSZ, Figure 9a, it is observable that complete densification has not occurred due to the coarse particle size, and the EDS scan confirmed that Ca and Ce were evenly dispersed without agglomeration. After corrosion, the surface of 2Ce_CSZ shows signs of deterioration due to the slag. The EDS scans of Ca and Si reveal remnants of slag left on the surface, particularly concentrated near the grain boundaries that formed post-corrosion. Discerning the destabilization behavior of Ca was challenging due to the presence of Ca in the slag, and no destabilization behavior of Ce due to slag post-corrosion was observed. Figure 9d presents the cross-sectional SEM-EDS images of 2Ce_CSZ after corrosion, where the infiltration of slag into the interior due to high porosity can be seen.
Figure 10 shows the surface XRD data of CeO2-doped CSZ after corrosion. Similar to MnO2-doped CSZ, no slag peaks were observed in CeO2-doped CSZ post-corrosion; instead, tetragonal and monoclinic peaks were present. After corrosion, the monoclinic phase fraction calculated through the integrated intensity of X-ray diffraction increased due to destabilization, though it remained lower than that of CSZ (Table 7). Additionally, as the doping amount of CeO2 increased, the monoclinic phase fraction further decreased. In Figure 10c, the t(101) peak exhibited a high angle shift due to destabilization, with less shift occurring as the Ce doping amount increased. The calculated B i value for CeO2 using Equation (3) is 0.702, not significantly different from the B i value of SiO2 (0.470), indicating a small basicity gap. Consequently, it is inferred that CeO2-doped CSZ demonstrates superior corrosion resistance compared to CaO, and unlike MnO2-doped CSZ, Ce is not easily leached by the slag, allowing the tetragonal phase to be maintained.

4. Conclusions

We doped CSZ with MnO2 and CeO2, respectively, to enhance its corrosion resistance and investigated the mechanical properties and slag-induced destabilization behavior. The monoclinic phase volume fraction decreased from 33.7% (CSZ) to 0% (3Mn_CSZ, 4Mn_CSZ) as the doping amount of MnO2 increased. A splitting phenomenon of the t(101) peak was observed in 2Mn_CSZ, and a complete splitting resulting in a cubic phase occurred in 4Mn_CSZ. It was noted that the relative density increased with MnO2 doping, showing a relative density of 77.68% in 4Mn-doped CSZ compared to 75.16% in CSZ at 1600 °C. The increase in relative density and decrease in monoclinic phase fraction with MnO2 doping resulted in an increase in Vickers hardness and flexural strength, though these properties decreased in 3Mn_CSZ and 4Mn_CSZ, where a cubic phase was formed. The monoclinic phase fraction of CSZ increased from 33.7% to 39.4% after the corrosion test. The MnO2-doped CSZ had a higher monoclinic phase fraction compared to CSZ after the corrosion test, resulting in reduced corrosion resistance, and the monoclinic phase fraction of 4Mn_CSZ increased from 0% to 42.4%. These results are attributed to the predominant existence of Mn in the forms of Mn3+ and Mn2+, rather than Mn4+, and their low melting points due to the small basicity gap with SiO2. With CeO2-doped CSZ, an increase in the CeO2-doping amount led to a decrease in the monoclinic phase fraction, though at a lower rate than in MnO2-doped CSZ. This is because Ce in the zirconia lattice mainly exists in the form of Ce4+, and the stabilization of the tetragonal phase is mainly due to the lattice stress caused by the ionic radius difference between Zr4+ and Ce4+, resulting in a less significant stabilizing effect than MnO2. CeO2-doped CSZ showed a lower relative density compared to CSZ due to its low sinterability, leading to a decrease in Vickers hardness and flexural strength. Pre- and post-corrosion SEM-EDS images indicated that the destabilizing behavior of Ca was challenging to observe due to the presence of Ca in the slag, and no post-corrosion destabilizing behavior of Ce due to slag was observed. The XRD data from the specimen surface post-corrosion exhibited a lower monoclinic phase fraction compared to CSZ, decreasing progressively with increased CeO2 doping. These results suggest that CeO2 primarily exists in the form of Ce4+ within the zirconia lattice, demonstrating superior slag resistance compared to CaO due to the small basicity gap. For further study, we aim to conduct research on simultaneously doping MnO2 and CeO2 to combine the high phase stability of MnO2 for improved thermal shock resistance and enhanced corrosion resistance from CeO2.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma16227240/s1, Figure S1: SEM surface images of (a) CSZ, (b) 1Mn_CSZ, (c) 2Mn_CSZ, (d) 3Mn_CSZ and (e) 4Mn_CSZ sintered at 1600 °C. Figure S2: SEM surface images of (a) CSZ, (b) 1Ce_CSZ, (c) 2Ce_CSZ, (d) 3Ce_CSZ and (e) 4Ce_CSZ sintered at 1600 °C.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L. (Hwanseok Lee); data curation, H.L. (Hwanseok Lee), H.-S.L. and K.J.; formal analysis, H.L. (Hwanseok Lee), H.-S.L. and S.K.; acquisition, H.L. (Heesoo Lee); investigation, H.L. (Hwanseok Lee), S.K. and H.-S.L.; methodology, H.L. (Hwanseok Lee) and K.J.; projection administration, H.L. (Heesoo Lee); supervision, I.J.; visualization, I.J.; writing—original draft preparation, H.L. (Hwanseok Lee); writing—review and editing, I.J. and H.L. (Heesoo Lee). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) grant funded by the Korea Government (MOTIE) (P0008335, HDR Program for Industrial Innovation).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data and analysis in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, P.; Piao, R.; Zou, Z. Mesoscopic Fluid-Particle Flow and Vortex Structural Transmission in a Submerged Entry Nozzle of Continuous Caster. Materials 2022, 15, 2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sunwoo, S.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.K. Corrosion mechanism of zirconia/graphite SEN by molten steel and slag. J. Korean Cryst. Growth Cryst. 2000, 10, 226–232. [Google Scholar]
  3. Colin, S.; Jeannot, F.; Dupre, B.; Gleitzer, C.; Kaerle, M.C.; Le Coq, X. Ceria-doped zirconia-graphite as possible refractory for tundish nozzles in steelmaking. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 1993, 11, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kondo, H. Submerged entry nozzle which prevents alumina clogging. Shinagawa Tech. Rep. 1997, 40, 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  5. Peirani, M.V.; Brandaleze, E. Corrosion mechanisms caused on a submerged nozzle applied in steel billet production by mold fluxes with and without fluorine. Sch. J. Eng. Technol. 2017, 5, 280–289. [Google Scholar]
  6. Nakamura, Y.; Ando, T.; Kurata, K.; Ikeda, M. Effect of chemical composition of mold powder on the erosion of submerged nozzles for continuous casting of steel. Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn 1986, 26, 1052–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yan, W.; Chen, W.; Li, J. Quality control of high carbon steel for steel wires. Materials 2019, 12, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dick, A.F.; Yu, X.; Pomfret, R.J.; Coley, K.S. Attack of submerged entry nozzles by mould flux and dissolution of refractory oxides in the flux. ISIJ Int. 1997, 37, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cirilli, F.; Di Donato, A.; Martini, U.; Miceli, P.; Guillo, P.; Simoes, J.; Song, Y.J. Corrosion mechanisms of zirconia/carbon based refractory materials by slag in presence of steel. Metallurgia Italiana 2008, 10, 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sharma, M.; Mu, W.; Dogan, N. In situ observation of dissolution of oxide inclusions in steelmaking slags. Jom 2018, 70, 1220–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hauck, F.; Pötschke, J. Der Verschleiß von Tauchausgüssen beim Stranggießen von Stahl. Arch. Für Das Eisenhüttenwesen 1982, 53, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, S.; Yuan, H.; Gan, M.; Wang, Q.; He, S.; Wang, Q. Wetting and Erosion of ZrO2-Graphite Refractory by CaO-SiO2 and CaO-Al2O3-Based Mold Slags for Submerged Entry Nozzle. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2019, 50, 1407–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yoo, H.; Lee, H.; Jo, K.; Kim, J.; Jo, I.; Lee, H. Phase Formation and Stabilization Behavior of Ca-PSZ by Post-Heat Treatment. Metals 2002, 12, 1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ślęzak, M.; Warzecha, M. Investigations of liquid steel viscosity and its impact as the initial parameter on modeling of the steel flow through the tundish. Materials 2020, 13, 5025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kumar, A.; Khanna, R.; Ikram-ul-Haq, M.; Spink, J.; Sahajwalla, V. Effect of glaze on the corrosion behavior of ZrO2–graphite insert of the submerged entry nozzle in the continuous casting of steel. Steel Res. Int. 2015, 86, 1004–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Strakhov, V.I.; Zhukovskaya, A.E. Slag-resistant products made from stabilized ZrO2. Refractories 1979, 20, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Oki, K. Study of corrosion and penetration of zirconia refractories by molten steel and slag (1st report). Taikabutsu Overseas 1983, 3, 3. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hirata, T.; Morimoto, T.; Ohta, S.; Uchida, N. Improvement of the corrosion resistance of alumina–chromia ceramic materials in molten slag. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2003, 23, 2089–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moringa, K.; Yoshida, H.; Takebe, H. Compositional dependence of absorption spectra of Ti3+ in silicate, borate, and phosphate glasses. J. Am. Ceram 1994, 77, 3113–3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. ISO 5803; Fine Ceramics (Advanced Ceramics, Advanced Technical Ceramics)—Test Method for Determination of Monoclinic Phase in Zirconia. International Standards Organization (ISO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
  21. Clavel, G.; Willinger, M.G.; Zitoun, D.; Pinna, N. Manganese-Doped Zirconia Nanocrystals. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 2008, 863–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, B.; Lee, H. Valence state and ionic conduction in Mn-doped MgO partially stabilized zirconia. J. Am. Ceram. 2018, 101, 1790–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kanghee, J.; Buyoung, K.; Jiseung, R.; Hyeong-Tae, K.; Heesoo, L. Densification of Mn-Doped YSZ for the Solid Oxide Membrane Process and its Surface Corrosion under Fluoride Salt. J. Ceram. Sci. Technol. 2020, 11, 91–97. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tovar-Vargas, D.; Turon-Vinas, M.; Anglada, M.; Jimenez-Pique, E. Enhancement of mechanical properties of ceria-calcia stabilized zirconia by alumina reinforcement. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 3714–3722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yoshimura, M. Phase stability of zirconia. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull 1988, 67. [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, C.; Sun, H.H.; Li, L.T. Glass phase structure of blast furnace slag. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 168, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Z.; Wang, T.; Dai, C.; Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Kong, J. Preparation and thermal-insulating properties of Ce-doped ZrO2 hollow fibers derived from a metaplexis template. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2019, 16, 1581–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, B.; Ryu, J.; Jeon, S.; Lee, H. Oxygen vacancy generation and structural stability of MgO partially-stabilized zirconia upon MnO2 addition. Mater. Res. Express 2017, 4, 126309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, P.; Chen, I.W.; Penner-Hahn, J.E. Effect of dopants on zirconia stabilization—An x-ray absorption study: II, tetravalent dopants. J. Am. Ceram. 1994, 77, 1281–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nascente, P.A.; de Souza, D.P. XPS characterisation of ceria-stabilised zirconia doped with iron oxide. Appl. Surf. Sci 1999, 144, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Particle size distribution of (a) CSZ powder, (b) MnO2 powder, (c) CeO2 powder, (d) 2Mn_CSZ powder after calcination and (e) 2Ce_CSZ powder after calcination.
Figure 1. Particle size distribution of (a) CSZ powder, (b) MnO2 powder, (c) CeO2 powder, (d) 2Mn_CSZ powder after calcination and (e) 2Ce_CSZ powder after calcination.
Materials 16 07240 g001
Figure 2. (a) CSZ powder, (b) MnO2 powder, (c) CeO2 powder, (d) 2Mn_CSZ powder after calcination, and (e) 2Ce_CSZ powder after calcination.
Figure 2. (a) CSZ powder, (b) MnO2 powder, (c) CeO2 powder, (d) 2Mn_CSZ powder after calcination, and (e) 2Ce_CSZ powder after calcination.
Materials 16 07240 g002
Figure 3. (a) XRD diffraction patterns (b) m ( 11 1 ) and m ( 111 ) peaks and (c) t( 101 ) and C ( 111 ) peaks of MnO2-doped CSZ.
Figure 3. (a) XRD diffraction patterns (b) m ( 11 1 ) and m ( 111 ) peaks and (c) t( 101 ) and C ( 111 ) peaks of MnO2-doped CSZ.
Materials 16 07240 g003
Figure 4. (a) Relative density vs. sintering temperature, and (b) Vickers hardness and flexural strength of MnO2-doped CSZ.
Figure 4. (a) Relative density vs. sintering temperature, and (b) Vickers hardness and flexural strength of MnO2-doped CSZ.
Materials 16 07240 g004
Figure 5. SEM-EDS surface images of 2Mn_CSZ (a) before corrosion, and (b) after corrosion and SEM-EDS corrosion cross-sectional images of 2Mn_CSZ (c) before corrosion, and (d) after corrosion test (same magnification).
Figure 5. SEM-EDS surface images of 2Mn_CSZ (a) before corrosion, and (b) after corrosion and SEM-EDS corrosion cross-sectional images of 2Mn_CSZ (c) before corrosion, and (d) after corrosion test (same magnification).
Materials 16 07240 g005
Figure 6. (a) XRD diffraction patterns, (b) m (11 1 ) and m (111) peaks, and (c) t(101) peaks of MnO2-doped CSZ after corrosion test.
Figure 6. (a) XRD diffraction patterns, (b) m (11 1 ) and m (111) peaks, and (c) t(101) peaks of MnO2-doped CSZ after corrosion test.
Materials 16 07240 g006
Figure 7. (a) XRD diffraction patterns, (b) m (11 1 ) and m (111) peaks, and (c) t(101) of CeO2-doped CSZ.
Figure 7. (a) XRD diffraction patterns, (b) m (11 1 ) and m (111) peaks, and (c) t(101) of CeO2-doped CSZ.
Materials 16 07240 g007
Figure 8. (a) Relative density vs. sintering temperature, and (b) Vickers hardness and flexural strength of CeO2-doped CSZ.
Figure 8. (a) Relative density vs. sintering temperature, and (b) Vickers hardness and flexural strength of CeO2-doped CSZ.
Materials 16 07240 g008
Figure 9. SEM-EDS surface images of 2Ce_CSZ (a) before corrosion, and (b) after corrosion and SEM-EDS corrosion cross-sectional images of 2Ce_CSZ (c) before corrosion, and (d) after corrosion test (same magnification).
Figure 9. SEM-EDS surface images of 2Ce_CSZ (a) before corrosion, and (b) after corrosion and SEM-EDS corrosion cross-sectional images of 2Ce_CSZ (c) before corrosion, and (d) after corrosion test (same magnification).
Materials 16 07240 g009
Figure 10. (a) XRD diffraction patterns, (b) m (11 1 ) and m (111) peaks, and (c) t(101) of CeO2-doped CSZ after corrosion.
Figure 10. (a) XRD diffraction patterns, (b) m (11 1 ) and m (111) peaks, and (c) t(101) of CeO2-doped CSZ after corrosion.
Materials 16 07240 g010
Table 1. Chemical composition of CSZ powder (mol. %).
Table 1. Chemical composition of CSZ powder (mol. %).
ZrO2CaOHfO2SiO2Al2O3TiO2
81.81813.7071.7391.8940.3240.517
Table 2. Composition of the CSZ specimens with different amounts of MnO2 and CeO2.
Table 2. Composition of the CSZ specimens with different amounts of MnO2 and CeO2.
CompoundComposition
MnO2 (mol%)CeO2 (mol%)CSZ
1Mn_CSZ1-Balance
2Mn_CSZ2-
3Mn_CSZ3-
4Mn_CSZ4-
1Ce_CSZ-1
2Ce_CSZ-2
3Ce_CSZ-3
4Ce_CSZ-4
Table 3. Chemical composition of slag powder (mol. %).
Table 3. Chemical composition of slag powder (mol. %).
Slag PowderSiO2CaONa2OMgOAl2O3
Composition (mol. %)35.50035.91923.8972.9401.743
Table 4. Monoclinic volume fraction of MnO2-doped CSZ.
Table 4. Monoclinic volume fraction of MnO2-doped CSZ.
SpecimenVolume Fraction (%)
Monoclinic (Vm)Tetragonal (Vt)Cubic (Vc)
CSZ33.766.3-
1Mn_CSZ19.780.3-
2Mn_CSZ2.897.2-
3Mn_CSz-95.44.6
4Mn_CSZ-90.99.1
Table 5. Monoclinic volume fraction of MnO2-doped CSZ after corrosion test.
Table 5. Monoclinic volume fraction of MnO2-doped CSZ after corrosion test.
SpecimenVolume Fraction (%)
Monoclinic (Vm)Tetragonal (Vt)Cubic (Vc)
CSZ33.7 → 39.466.3 → 33.7-
1Mn_CSZ19.7 → 42.780.3 → 57.3-
2Mn_CSZ2.8 → 42.591.2 → 57.5-
3Mn_CSz- → 40.095.4 → 60.04.6 → -
4Mn_CSZ- → 42.490.9 → 57.69.1 → -
Table 6. Monoclinic volume fraction of CeO2-doped CSZ after corrosion test.
Table 6. Monoclinic volume fraction of CeO2-doped CSZ after corrosion test.
cVolume Fraction (%)
Monoclinic (Vm)Tetragonal (Vt)Cubic (Vc)
CSZ33.766.3-
1Ce_CSZ29.570.5-
2Ce_CSZ27.972.1-
3Ce_CSz24.675.4-
4Ce_CSZ21.878.2-
Table 7. Monoclinic volume fraction of CeO2-doped CSZ after corrosion.
Table 7. Monoclinic volume fraction of CeO2-doped CSZ after corrosion.
SpecimenVolume Fraction (%)
Monoclinic (Vm)Tetragonal (Vt)Cubic (Vc)
CSZ33.7 → 39.466.3 → 60.6-
1Ce_CSZ29.5 → 33.570.5 → 66.5-
2Ce_CSZ27.9 → 31.272.1 → 68.8-
3Ce_CSz24.6 → 27.575.4 → 72.5-
4Ce_CSZ21.8 → 24.878.2 →75.2-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, H.; Lee, H.-S.; Kim, S.; Jo, K.; Jo, I.; Lee, H. Phase Stability and Slag-Induced Destabilization in MnO2 and CeO2-Doped Calcia-Stabilized Zirconia. Materials 2023, 16, 7240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16227240

AMA Style

Lee H, Lee H-S, Kim S, Jo K, Jo I, Lee H. Phase Stability and Slag-Induced Destabilization in MnO2 and CeO2-Doped Calcia-Stabilized Zirconia. Materials. 2023; 16(22):7240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16227240

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Hwanseok, Hee-Seon Lee, Seonghoon Kim, Kanghee Jo, Ilguk Jo, and Heesoo Lee. 2023. "Phase Stability and Slag-Induced Destabilization in MnO2 and CeO2-Doped Calcia-Stabilized Zirconia" Materials 16, no. 22: 7240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16227240

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop