Next Article in Journal
Research on the Development of a Way to Modify Asphalt Mixtures with PET Recyclates
Next Article in Special Issue
Phosphorus-Doped Hollow Tubular g-C3N4 for Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Rolling Defects of Al-Mg Alloys with High Mg Content in Normal Rolling and Cross-Rolling Processes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Theoretical and Experimental Study of the Photocatalytic Properties of ZnO Semiconductor Nanoparticles Synthesized by Prosopis laevigata
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

TiO2 Nanotubes Decorated with Mo2C for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water-Splitting Properties

by
Siti Nurul Falaein Moridon
1,
Khuzaimah Arifin
1,*,
Mohamad Azuwa Mohamed
1,2,
Lorna Jeffery Minggu
1,
Rozan Mohamad Yunus
1 and
Mohammad B. Kassim
1,2
1
Fuel Cell Institute, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
2
Department of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(18), 6261; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186261
Submission received: 9 June 2023 / Revised: 6 July 2023 / Accepted: 7 July 2023 / Published: 18 September 2023

Abstract

:
The presence of Ti3+ in the structure of TiO2 nanotube arrays (NTs) has been shown to enhance the photoelectrochemical (PEC) water-splitting performance of these NTs, leading to improved results compared to pristine anatase TiO2 NTs. To further improve the properties related to PEC performance, we successfully produced TiO2 NTs using a two-step electrochemical anodization technique, followed by annealing at a temperature of 450 °C. Subsequently, Mo2C was decorated onto the NTs by dip coating them with precursors at varying concentrations and times. The presence of anatase TiO2 and Ti3O5 phases within the TiO2 NTs was confirmed through X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The TiO2 NTs that were decorated with Mo2C demonstrated a photocurrent density of approximately 1.4 mA cm−2, a value that is approximately five times greater than the photocurrent density exhibited by the bare TiO2 NTs, which was approximately 0.21 mA cm−2. The observed increase in photocurrent density can be ascribed to the incorporation of Mo2C as a cocatalyst, which significantly enhances the photocatalytic characteristics of the TiO2 NTs. The successful deposition of Mo2C onto the TiO2 NTs was further corroborated by the characterization techniques utilized. The utilization of field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) allowed for the observation of Mo2C particles on the surface of TiO2 NTs. To validate the composition and optical characteristics of the decorated NTs, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and UV absorbance analysis were performed. This study introduces a potentially effective method for developing efficient photoelectrodes based on TiO2 for environmentally sustainable hydrogen production through the use of photoelectrochemical water-splitting devices. The utilization of Mo2C as a cocatalyst on TiO2 NTs presents opportunities for the advancement of effective and environmentally friendly photoelectrochemical (PEC) systems.

1. Introduction

The extreme reliance on fossil fuels for energy generation since the industrial revolution has triggered a global energy crisis and various other environmental problems [1,2]. Therefore, reducing energy dependence on fossil fuels through the provision of clean and renewable energy sources is urgent. One alternative is to use clean and green hydrogen (H2) directly produced from water molecules using solar light energy, known as the photoelectrochemical (PEC) process. H2 can be used as fuel in an electrochemical fuel cell device to produce electricity, with pure water as the only byproduct.
In the PEC process, semiconductor materials are employed as photoelectrodes [2]. To date, numerous semiconductor materials, such as TiO2 [3,4,5], Co3O4 [6,7], WO3 [8], Cu2O [9], and Fe2O3 [10], have been investigated as photoelectrode materials. Among them, TiO2 has garnered considerable attention due to its photoactivity, low cost, excellent chemical stability, and abundance in nature [11]. However, TiO2 can only be stimulated by UV light, which accounts for only 3–5% of solar energy radiation, because of its large band gap, further causing quick recombination of photoinduced electron-hole pairs as well as inefficient charge carrier separation [11]. Therefore, various methods have been used to improve the PEC performance and photocatalytic activity of TiO2, including morphology modification [12,13,14], synthesis of composite heterojunctions with other materials [15], ion doping [16,17], facet engineering [18], and cocatalyst addition [19].
In terms of morphology, TiO2 nanotube arrays (NTs) have attracted attention due to their high specific surface area, excellent adsorption capacity, and good structural properties for electron transport. Several methods have been employed to fabricate TiO2 NT photoelectrodes, and electrochemical anodization is considered one of the most promising methods for fabricating a highly ordered NT structure [20]. Although the electrochemical anodization method is considered a promising fabrication method for producing ordered TiO2 NTs with defect engineering and doping, the PEC performance of fabricated TiO2 NTs still does not reach satisfactory levels due to their restricted light harvesting and the high resistance at the interface between the nanotubes and the substrate. Therefore, a synergistic approach combining various strategies, such as the formation of heterojunctions with other semiconductor materials or the addition of cocatalyst materials, could prove excellent for obtaining TiO2 NTs with efficient light harvesting and charge separation for high PEC water-splitting performance. Currently, 2D MXenes have been investigated as promising catalysts or cocatalysts in many applications. The nomenclature “MXene” has been used to represent a group of compounds that includes transition metal carbides, nitrides, and carbonitrides. The nomenclature “MXene” is derived from its chemical composition, wherein the symbol “M” represents a transition metal, “X” signifies carbon and/or nitrogen, and the suffix “ene” refers to its two-dimensional structural arrangement [21]. Among the reported MXene materials, dimolybdenum carbide (Mo2C) has been reported to show excellent electrocatalytic performance in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) [21]. It has an electronic density of states comparable to that of Pt and excellent electrical conductivity. In addition to being used as a catalyst for the HER, Mo2C has also been investigated for photocatalytic water splitting for hydrogen generation [22]. Shen et al. reported that the Mo2C/CdS nanocomposite produced a photocurrent density 7.83 times higher than that of pure CdS [23]. Furthermore, Yue et al. reported that dandelion-like TiO2 nanoparticles with 1% Mo2C were able to produce H2 with a production rate of 39.4 mmol h−1 g−1, which is 25 times that obtained with pristine TiO2 [22].
Although Mo2C has been shown to be a good cocatalyst for TiO2, the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 NTs on Ti foil substrates with Mo2C has yet to be reported. This study presents the effectiveness of TiO2 NTs with Mo2C incorporated as a cocatalyst for PEC water-splitting applications. Here, TiO2 NTs were prepared by two-step electrochemical anodization, and Mo2C was inserted by dip coating the NTs into Mo2C precursors of various concentrations for various dipping times. Our findings indicated that the combined effect of multiple PEC improvement strategies could offer a versatile and systematic way to overcome the intrinsic and extrinsic limitations of TiO2 NTs for PEC water-splitting applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Titanium foil (0.127 nm thickness, obtained from Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA), molybdenum carbide (Mo2C) (99%, obtained from Sigma Aldrich), Pt mesh (99%, obtained from Sigma Aldrich), ethylene glycol (analytical grade, obtained from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), ammonium fluoride NH4F (analytical grade, obtained from Merck, Germany), distilled water, ethanol (analytical grade, obtained from QReC, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia) and sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) were used. All chemicals were used as received from the manufacturer without additional purification.

2.2. Fabrication of TiO2 NTs and TiO2 NTs Decorated with Mo2C

The TiO2 NTs were fabricated using a multiple anodization technique [24]. First, cleaned Ti foil (1.5 cm × 1.5 cm) was used as the anode, and Pt foil was used as the counter electrode connected to a power supply at a voltage of 50 V for one hour. Ethylene glycol containing 0.3 vol. % NH4F and 2 vol. % distilled water was used as the electrolyte. The anodized film was then sonicated in a mixture of ethanol and distilled water (1:1) for 5 min to clean dirt away from the openings of the grown nanotubes. Subsequently, the Ti foil underwent a second anodization process for 30 min in the same electrolyte at the same voltage. Then, ethanol and distilled water were used to flush the samples. The anodized samples were then annealed at 450 °C for 3 h at a ramping rate of 2 °C/min. The best TiO2 NTs that achieved the highest photocurrent were then dip coated in an ethanol/distilled water mixture containing highly dispersed Mo2C at four different concentrations of 5 g/L, 10 g/L, 15 g/L and 20 g/L, and the obtained samples were labeled S-1, S-2, S-3 and S-4, respectively.

2.3. Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were acquired via a Bruker D-8 Advance (Ettlingen, Germany, Equipment sourced by Bruker Malaysia), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed using a Kratos/Shimadzu instrument (model: Axis Ultra DLD) (Milton Keynes, UK, Equipment sourced by Shimadzu Malaysia) to determine the chemical phases present in the crystalline substances. The XRD patterns were analyzed using X’Pert HighScore software (Version 2.2b). To investigate the topographic nature of the surface, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) was carried out using a Zeiss Merlin Compact microscope (Oberkochen, Germany, Equipment sourced by Zeiss Malaysia). The optical properties were analyzed using a Perkin Elmer ultraviolet/visible/near-infrared spectrophotometer (UV–VIS-NIR) (model: Lambda 950) (Waltham, MA, USA, Equipment sourced by Perkin Elmer Malaysia).

2.4. PEC Property Measurements

An Ametek Versastat 4 was used to carry out the PEC analysis. An exposed area of 1 cm2 was employed for testing the thin films that served as the working electrode in a PEC cell. The counter electrode consisted of a platinum wire; the reference electrode was a Ag/AgCl electrode. The counter electrode measured the potential difference between the two electrodes. In these experiments, 0.5 M Na2SO4 (pH 6.7) was used as the electrolyte. The current density on the thin film surfaces was measured in the dark and under solar AM 1.5 illumination using a xenon lamp (Oriel with an intensity of 100 mW cm−2). Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was conducted from 0 to +1.0 V versus Ag/AgCl in 0.5 M Na2SO4 at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1. To obtain a deeper understanding of the charge transport behavior shown by the synthesized photoanodes, Mott-Schottky analysis was performed at 1 kHz. This allowed for calculation of the charge carrier densities, as well as the conduction band (CB). The electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) Nyquist plots were constructed by utilizing 10 mV sinusoidal perturbations at a frequency of 100 kHz.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physical Characterization of TiO2 NTs

To thoroughly investigate the growth of TiO2 NTs, a detailed analysis was conducted comprising analysis of the morphology, crystal phase, crystallinity, and optical properties. Figure 1 shows the FESEM results that capture the microstructure of the TiO2 NT sample.
Based on the FESEM images, the TiO2 NT sample clearly exhibited non-interconnected single tubes (Figure 1a). The diameter of the TiO2 NTs was ~151–160 nm. Figure 1b displays cross-sectional views of TiO2 NTs. The length of the TiO2 NTs was ~3.4–3.8 µm.
Next, XRD analysis was carried out to identify the phases and determine the chemical composition. Figure 2a shows the XRD patterns of the Ti foil substrate and TiO2 NT sample.
The spectra show Ti alpha diffraction peaks representing the Ti foil at 35.01°, 38.27°, 40.10°, 52.99°, 62.89°, 70.66° and 76.18°, corresponding to the (0 1 0), (0 0 2), (0 1 1), (0 1 2), (0 1 3), (1 1 0) and (1 1 2) planes, respectively. However, when the sample was anodized, anatase peaks appeared at 25.28°, 47.83°, 53.09° and 55.02°, corresponding to the (0 1 1), (0 2 0), (0 1 5) and (1 2 1) planes, respectively. The intensity of the Ti alpha peaks was reduced because the surface of the titanium substrate was oxidized during the anodization process, which resulted in the formation of a layer of anatase titanium oxide. The XRD patterns found in this study are similar to those found in Quiroz et al., (2015), which contain a tri-titanium pentoxide (Ti3O5) phase [25]. Based on the XRD library patterns, the Ti alpha peaks overlapped with the Ti3O5 peaks at 38.27°, 52.99° and 70.66° and overlapped with some anatase peaks at 25.28° and 47.83°.
Figure 2b shows the results of the XPS analysis conducted to verify the presence of Ti3O5 in the TiO2 NT samples. The peaks at ~464 eV and 458 eV correspond to Ti 2p, and the Ti 2p peaks of Ti3+ were observed at binding energies of 463.1 eV (Ti3+ 2p3/2) and 459.1 eV (Ti4+ 2p1/2). The Ti 2p peaks of Ti4+ appeared at 458.5 eV (Ti4+ 2p3/2) and 464.2 eV (Ti4+ 2p1/2). The XPS spectra of TiO2 NTs revealed a modest shift in position and a change in the size of the original peaks of TiO2 NTs from those in a previous study after self-doping with Ti3+. The observed peak shift indicates that the self-doping of Ti with Ti3+ affected its electronic state. As a consequence of this process, some of the Ti4+ ions in the lattice are believed to have been replaced by Ti3+ ions. Furthermore, the decrease in the Ti4+ peaks suggests that there was less TiO2 present in the sample. The creation of oxygen vacancies in the surface layer during the multistep anodization procedure can be deduced to be responsible for the diminishing area of the Ti4+ species peak [26]. Furthermore, the peaks at binding energies of 529.9 eV and 530.6 eV were ascribed to lattice oxygen for TiO2 NTs. The O 1s spectra provided more evidence demonstrating that more oxygen defects were present in the TiO2 NTs [27]. The percentage of atomic oxygen vacancies for TiO2 NTs was 6.25%. The XPS results agreed with the XRD results, suggesting that more Ti3+ was produced during the anodization process.
Figure 3a shows the UV–Vis absorption spectra over the wavelength range from 250 to 800 nm, showing that the TiO2 NTs had higher absorption in the UV range. Next, the band gap of the sample was calculated using Kubelka–Munk theory, and the value for the TiO2 NTs was 3.15 eV [3].

3.2. Physical Characterization of Mo2C as a Cocatalyst Decorated on TiO2 NTs

Mo2C was added to TiO2 NTs using a dip coating technique. Dip coating is a simple, dependable, and robust process that can be used to cover almost any substrate material by immersing it in a solution and then removing it to drip dry to form a conformal coating.
FESEM analysis was performed to study the effect of different concentrations of the Mo2C precursor on the morphology of TiO2 NTs. Figure 4(a1–d3) shows micrographs of TiO2 NTs for different precursor Mo2C concentrations.
As shown in Figure 4, increasing the concentration resulted in an increasing deposition amount. Figure 4(a1,b1) illustrate that the distribution of Mo2C on the surface of the TiO2 NTs was not uniform. Figure 4(c1) shows that Mo2C was well distributed inside the TiO2 NT tubes at a concentration of 15 g/L, which was crucial for the photoelectrode activity. Increasing the concentration to 20 g/L resulted in large nanoclusters of Mo2C blocking most TiO2 NTs (Figure 4(d1)). Next, Figure 4(a2–d2) illustrates cross-sectional views of the decorated Mo2C on the TiO2 NTs. The length of the TiO2 NTs increased as the concentration of Mo2C increased; this finding may support the idea that Mo2C is distributed on the upper openings of the TiO2 NTs. In addition, an image of the cross-section of sample S-3 can be seen in the inset of Figure 4(c2); this image demonstrates that Mo2C decorated the outside wall of the tubes. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) mapping and cross-section analysis were performed to determine the distribution of Mo2C in sample S-3 with a concentration of 15 g/L. The findings are shown in Figure 4(a3–d3), suggesting that Mo2C was equally dispersed over the TiO2 NT surface and in the interstices. This indicates that Mo2C was efficiently distributed across the sample, resulting in a uniform distribution.
The XRD patterns of TiO2 NTs after deposition of Mo2C are presented in Figure 5.
The diffraction peaks at 25.1°, 37.8°, 48.0°, 52.9° and 62.3° in the pattern of bare TiO2 NTs were identified as corresponding to the planes of anatase TiO2 and Ti3O5 phases (JCPDS nos. 98-009-4632 and 98-007-1775). Upon deposition of Mo2C nanoparticles, the patterns displayed additional peaks at 27.2°, 37.2°, 38.3°, 41.1° and 68.8°, which correspond to the standard diffraction peaks of Mo2C (JCPDS no. 98-006-1705). These findings are consistent with the FESEM results, in which increasing the concentration of Mo2C leads to increases in the amount of deposited Mo2C and the intensity of the peaks. The observed peaks indicate the successful deposition of Mo2C nanoparticles onto the TiO2 NT surface, which can potentially enhance the PEC properties of the material.
The UV–Vis absorption spectra of Mo2C/TiO2 NTs with various concentrations are presented in Figure 6a. The TiO2 NTs loaded with Mo2C nanoparticles exhibited a broader absorption in the visible light region (450 nm to 800 nm) compared to pure TiO2 NTs. Among the samples, S-3 showed the highest absorption and thus had the highest PEC activity. The band gap of the samples is displayed in Figure 6b, revealing that the Mo2C-loaded TiO2 NTs had a lower band gap than the pure TiO2 NTs.
The band gap of S-3 was determined to be ~2.80 eV, the smallest among the samples. Previous reports suggest that higher absorption in the visible region corresponds to better PEC water-splitting activity. Fine-tuning the band gap and band locations is necessary when creating visible light-responsive photocatalysts for hydrogen production.

3.3. PEC Properties of TiO2 NTs and Mo2C as a Cocatalyst Decorated on TiO2 NTs

Mo2C has garnered interest in the field of PEC applications due to its exceptional stability in challenging environments and remarkable electrical conductivity, making it a promising cocatalyst for such purposes. Mo2C applied onto TiO2 NTs has been observed to function as an electron transfer mediator, thereby facilitating the separation of photogenerated charge carriers and resulting in an improved overall PEC performance of TiO2 NTs. The hybridization of TiO2 NTs with Mo2C has been found to exhibit a synergistic effect, whereby the distinctive characteristics of each material are combined to overcome the constraints of TiO2 NTs. This discussion explores the PEC characteristics of TiO2 NTs and TiO2 NTs that have been decorated with Mo2C as a cocatalyst.
The correlation between the TiO2 NTs with Mo2C as a cocatalyst and the PEC behavior of TiO2 NTs was investigated by chronoamperometric measurements under light chopping, and the test was carried out in 0.5 M Na2SO4 at a bias potential of 0.7 V vs. Ag/AgCl in the presence and absence of illumination (light-off and light-on). The concentration of Mo2C varied, with values of 5 g/L (S-1), 10 g/L (S-2), 15 g/L (S-3) and 20 g/L (S-4), as shown in Figure 7a.
All samples demonstrated a satisfactory photocurrent density as well as a good level of stability after 900 s. The photocurrent density of the TiO2 NT sample was determined to be 0.21 mA cm−2, and this value of photocurrent increased approximately one-fold when compared to the value of pure TiO2 NT due to the presence of oxygen vacancy defects, as reported in previous work [28,29,30]. Meanwhile, the photocurrent densities produced by samples S-1, S-2 and S-4 were similar to that of bare TiO2 NTs. The significant photocurrent density produced by sample S-3 had a value of ~1.4 mA cm−2, nearly five times higher than that of bare TiO2 NTs.
EIS is a trustworthy method for investigating the charge transfer and recombination rate at semiconductor electrolyte interfaces, where “Zre” is the real portion and “Zim” is the imaginary part. Due to the relationship between the arc of the circle and the charge transfer resistance, the Nyquist plots provide sufficient information on the charge transfer. In the Nyquist plot, a smaller arc indicates greater charge carrier separation and higher charge transfer efficiency (conductivity) [30]. Figure 7b shows that sample S-3 has the smallest semicircle radius. This indicates that photogenerated electron-hole pairs are more effectively separated and that electrons may more easily cross the valence band in response to a relatively low-energy excitation. As a consequence, the charge transfer in S-3 is enhanced, proving the presence of a large separation between the holes and electrons.
The Mott–Schottky (M–S) curves of all photoelectrode samples are shown in Figure 7c. The flat band potential (Efb) was estimated by projecting the linear section of the plots onto the potential axis. In addition, the donor density (ND) was calculated using the slope of the M–S curves and Equation (1) obtained from previous work [25,30]. The ND and Efb values determined are reported in Table 1, and the Efb values of sample S-3 are less negative, which indicates an upward shift of the Fermi level [30,31].
N D = 2 e ε ε o A 2 d 1 C 2 d E 1
where d 1 C 2 d E is the slope of the tangent line in the Mott–Schottky plot, e is the electron charge, ε is the dielectric constant of the TiO2 film, ε0 is the vacuum permittivity, and A is the surface area of the TiO2 NT thin film electrode.
The efficiency with which a PEC cell converts light into electricity is quantified by the applied bias photon-to-current efficiency (ABPE). To assess how well a PEC cell converts solar energy into a usable form, the ABPE test is crucial. This method is useful for comparing the efficiency of various materials in converting light into electricity and for determining the efficacy of individual materials. To further improve the PEC cell design, the ABPE may be utilized to investigate how an applied bias affects the cell output. In conclusion, the ABPE is a useful metric for assessing PEC cell performance, yielding crucial data for improving future solar energy conversion technologies. Figure 7d shows the ABPE measurements of TiO2 NTs and S-3. The ABPE value was calculated using Equation (2) [32,33]:
ABPE % = [Jp (E0 rev − Eapp)/I0] × (100)
where Jp is the photocurrent density (mA/cm2), I0 is the illumination intensity (mW/cm2), E0 rev is the standard reversible potential for water splitting (1.23 V), and Eapp is the applied potential. The highest ABPE value for TiO2 NTs is 0.19% at 0.8 V, while that of S-3 is 0.89% at 0.2 V. Next, the solar-to-hydrogen efficiency (STH) was also calculated for PEC water splitting with a visible light source of irradiance 100 mW cm−2 using Equation (3) [32,33]:
S T H % = J P 1.23 V A p p P   ×   100
where Jp is the photocurrent density (mA/cm2), Vapp is the applied potential, and P is the intensity of the light source. The maximum STH % for TiO2 NTs is 0.05%, while that for Mo2C/TiO2 NTs (S-3) is 0.32%, as shown in Table 2.
The increased PEC properties of TiO2 NTs decorated with Mo2C are further explained by the proposed mechanism shown in Figure 8.
In this work, oxygen vacancies produce localized electronic states inside the energy gap, which correspond to Ti3+ species, which are in the mid-band gap. These restricted states may serve as traps or recombination sites for electrons and holes created by photons. The Mo2C deposited onto the TiO2 photoanode may serve as a cocatalyst to accelerate the HER and oxygen evolution reaction (OER), leading to a higher efficiency in PEC water splitting. Moreover, the Mo2C cocatalyst may minimize the energy barrier for charge transfer and avoid charge recombination, resulting in an increased photocurrent and better stability.
Upon irradiation with solar light, the TiO2 electrons may be excited into the CB during the process, and electrons move from the TiO2 photoanode to the cathode, resulting in the reduction of protons to hydrogen at the cathode. Mo2C works as a cocatalyst, boosting the oxidation of water molecules by facilitating the flow of holes from the TiO2 photoanode surface to the water molecules. The Mo2C catalyst helps reduce the energy barrier for the OER, which leads to a decrease in the overpotential needed to drive the reaction. This may lead to an increase in the rate of the reaction and consequently a greater efficiency of the entire water-splitting process.
The method for achieving very uniform Mo2C nanoparticles distributed on both the inside and outside vertically aligned TiO2 NTs via the dip coating deposition process has great promise. These novel interactions of Mo2C/TiO2 NTs dramatically enhance both the light absorption and the PEC activity under visible light illumination by 5-fold compared to those of pure TiO2 NTs. These characterization results are consistent with an improved Mo2C/TiO2 NT performance, although the result is not as incredible as that reported by previous researchers on the photocatalytic effect of Mo2C for pristine powder TiO2 [34]. There is still much room to improve the performance, such as by optimizing the length and tube diameter of TiO2 NTs so that they are suitable for Mo2C diffusion, as well as the Mo2C deposition methods.

4. Conclusions

The implementation of Mo2C as a cocatalyst led to a significant enhancement in the photocurrent density of TiO2 NTs. The photocurrent density of the modified TiO2 NTs was observed to be significantly enhanced by a factor of five when compared to the unmodified TiO2 NTs. The implications of these findings are of great importance for the further development of environmentally sustainable PEC water-splitting technologies, specifically in the domain of hydrogen production. The successful decoration of TiO2 NTs with Mo2C was confirmed through XRD and FESEM analysis. Moreover, the incorporation of Mo2C has been observed to significantly decrease the band gap and enhance the light absorption capabilities of TiO2 NTs. Significantly, it was determined that the most favorable concentration of Mo2C was 15 g/L (S-3), exhibiting the highest photoelectrochemical efficiency. In general, this study provides insights into the possible utilization of Mo2C-decorated TiO2 NTs, specifically the Ti3O5 phase, for enhancing the effectiveness and efficacy of photoelectrochemical systems. The utilization of Mo2C as a cocatalyst in PEC water-splitting applications is highly promising due to several factors. These include the achievement of enhanced photocurrent density, the confirmation of Mo2C’s presence through X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, the reduction of the band gap, and the determination of an optimal concentration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.A.; methodology, K.A. and S.N.F.M.; validation, S.N.F.M.; formal analysis, S.N.F.M.; investigation, S.N.F.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.N.F.M.; writing—review and editing, K.A., L.J.M., R.M.Y., M.A.M. and M.B.K.; supervision, K.A.; project administration, K.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Malaysia, through FRGS/1/2019/STG01/UKM/03/2.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The authors do not have permission to share data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mahmoud, M.; El-Kalliny, A.S.; Squadrito, G. Stacked titanium dioxide nanotubes photoanode facilitates unbiased hydrogen production in a solar-driven photoelectrochemical cell powered with a microbial fuel cell treating animal manure wastewater. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 254, 115225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, S.; Huang, D.; Xu, P.; Xue, W.; Lei, L.; Cheng, M.; Wang, R.; Liu, X.; Deng, R. Semiconductor-based photocatalysts for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting: Will we stop with photocorrosion? J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 2286–2322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Arifin, K.; Yunus, R.M.; Minggu, L.J.; Kassim, M.B. Improvement of TiO2 nanotubes for photoelectrochemical water splitting: Review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 4998–5024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, S.; Ren, H.; Wu, Z.; Sun, L.; Zhang, X.-G.; Lin, Y.-M.; Zhang, K.H.L.; Lin, C.-J.; Tian, Z.-Q.; Li, J.-F. Direct Z-scheme WO3−x nanowire-bridged TiO2 nanorod arrays for highly efficient photoelectrochemical overall water splitting. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 59, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Arifin, K.; Daud, W.R.W.; Kassim, M.B. Optical and photoelectrochemical properties of a TiO2 thin film doped with a ruthenium–tungsten bimetallic complex. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 2699–2707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moridon, S.N.F.; Salehmin, M.I.; Mohamed, M.A.; Arifin, K.; Minggu, L.J.; Kassim, M.B. Cobalt oxide as photocatalyst for water splitting: Temperature-dependent phase structures. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 25495–25504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, C.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, B.; Wang, Y.; Sun, P.; Wang, D.; Wei, Y.; Liu, Y. Multi-heterojunction photocatalysts based on WO3 nanorods: Structural design and optimization for enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 237, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Salehmin, M.N.I.; Minggu, L.J.; Mark-Lee, W.F.; Mohamed, M.A.; Arifin, K.; Jumali, M.H.H.; Kassim, M.B. Highly photoactive Cu2O nanowire film prepared with modified scalable synthesis method for enhanced photoelectrochemical performance. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 182, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ng, K.H.; Minggu, L.J.; Mark-Lee, W.F.; Arifin, K.; Jumali, M.H.H.; Kassim, M.B. A new method for the fabrication of a bilayer WO3/Fe2O3 photoelectrode for enhanced photoelectrochemical performance. Mater. Res. Bull. 2018, 98, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, X.; Zhang, R.; Gao, X.; Yu, B.; Gao, Y.; Han, Z.-G. TiO2-rutile/anatase homojunction with enhanced charge separation for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 26358–26366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liang, S.; He, J.; Sun, Z.; Liu, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Cheng, H.; He, B.; Xie, Z.; Wei, S. Improving Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Activity of TiO2 Nanotube Arrays by Tuning Geometrical Parameters. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 9049–9053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, J.; Tan, L.-L.; Chai, S.-P. Heterojunction photocatalysts for artificial nitrogen fixation: Fundamentals, latest advances and future perspectives. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 7011–7033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lin, Y.; Qian, Q.; Chen, Z.; Feng, D.; Tuan, P.D.; Yin, F. Surface Modification of TiO2 Nanotubes Prepared by Porous Titanium Anodization via Hydrothermal Reaction: A Method for Synthesis High-Efficiency Adsorbents of Recovering Sr Ions. Langmuir 2022, 38, 11354–11361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lakshmanareddy, N.; Rao, V.N.; Cheralathan, K.K.; Subramaniam, E.P.; Shankar, M.V. Pt/TiO2 nanotube photocatalyst—Effect of synthesis methods on valance state of Pt and its influence on hydrogen production and dye degradation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 538, 83–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cai, J.; Zhang, A.; Tao, H.; Li, R.; Han, J.; Huang, M. Ni-doped hybrids of TiO2 and two-dimensional Ti3C2 MXene for enhanced photocatalytic performance. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2023, 145, 115476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, X.; Dai, M.; Chen, Q.; Cheng, K.; Xu, H.; Zhang, J.; Song, H. Enhanced photoelectrochemical performance of NiO-doped TiO2 nanotubes prepared by an impregnation–calcination method. J. Chem. Res. 2021, 45, 1076–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, D.; Chen, J.; Xiang, Q.; Li, Y.; Liu, M.; Liao, Y. Transition-Metal-Ion (Fe, Co, Cr, Mn, Etc.) Doping of TiO2 Nanotubes: A General Approach. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 12511–12515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cao, F.; Xiong, J.; Wu, F.; Liu, Q.; Shi, Z.; Yu, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, L. Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Performance from Rationally Designed Anatase/Rutile TiO2 Heterostructures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 12239–12245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Anitha, V.C.; Goswami, A.; Sopha, H.; Nandan, D.; Gawande, M.B.; Cepe, K.; Ng, S.; Zboril, R.; Macak, J.M. Pt nanoparticles decorated TiO2 nanotubes for the reduction of olefins. Appl. Mater. Today 2018, 10, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cho, S.; Yim, G.; Park, J.T.; Jang, H. Surfactant-free one-pot synthesis of Au-TiO2 core-shell nanostars by inter-cation redox reaction for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 252, 115038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Inoue, K.; Matsuda, A.; Kawamura, G. Tube length optimization of titania nanotube array for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yuan, S.; Xia, M.; Liu, Z.; Wang, K.; Xiang, L.; Huang, G.; Zhang, J.; Li, N. Dual synergistic effects between Co and Mo2C in Co/Mo2C heterostructure for electrocatalytic overall water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 132697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yue, X.; Yi, S.; Wang, R.; Zhang, Z.; Qiu, S. A novel architecture of dandelion-like Mo2C/TiO2 heterojunction photocatalysts towards high-performance photocatalytic hydrogen production from water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 10591–10598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ozkan, S.; Nguyen, N.T.; Mazare, A.; Schmuki, P. Optimized Spacing between TiO2 Nanotubes for Enhanced Light Harvesting and Charge Transfer. Chemelectrochem 2018, 5, 3183–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Habibi-Hagh, F.; Foruzin, L.J.; Nasirpouri, F. Remarkable improvement of photoelectrochemical water splitting in pristine and black anodic TiO2 nanotubes by enhancing microstructural ordering and uniformity. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 11225–11236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Onoda, M. Phase Transitions of Ti3O5. J. Solid State Chem. 1998, 136, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Babu, S.J.; Rao, V.N.; Murthy, D.H.K.; Shastri, M.; Murthy, M.; Shetty, M.; Raju, K.A.; Shivaramu, P.D.; Kumar, C.S.A.; Shankar, M.; et al. Significantly enhanced cocatalyst-free H2 evolution from defect-engineered Brown TiO2. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 14821–14828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, P.-F.; Li, G.-S.; Li, W.-L.; Cheng, P.; Pang, Z.-Y.; Xiong, X.-L.; Zou, X.-L.; Xu, Q.; Lu, X.-G. Progress in Ti3O5: Synthesis, properties and applications. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2021, 31, 3310–3327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Divyasri, Y.V.; Reddy, N.L.; Lee, K.; Sakar, M.; Rao, V.N.; Venkatramu, V.; Shankar, M.V.; Reddy, N.C.G. Optimization of N doping in TiO2 nanotubes for the enhanced solar light mediated photocatalytic H2 production and dye degradation. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 269, 116170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ning, X.; Huang, J.; Li, L.; Gu, Y.; Jia, S.; Qiu, R.; Li, S.; Kim, B.H. Homostructured rutile TiO2 nanotree arrays thin film electrodes with nitrogen doping for enhanced photoelectrochemical performance. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 16030–16040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.; Gao, L.; Huo, J.; Li, Y.; Kang, W.; Zou, C.; Jia, L. Designing novel 0D/1D/2D NiO@La(OH)3/g-C3N4 heterojunction for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 460, 141667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Z.; Bian, H.; Xu, Z.; Lu, J.; Li, Y.Y. Solution-Based Comproportionation Reaction for Facile Synthesis of Black TiO2 Nanotubes and Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 6087–6092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, C.; Gao, Z.; Gao, S.; Wang, Q.; Xu, H.; Wang, Z.; Huang, B.; Dai, Y. Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 photoelectrodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting and photoelectrocatalytic pollutant degradation. J. Energy Chem. 2016, 25, 726–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Miao, M.; Pan, J.; He, T.; Yan, Y.; Xia, B.Y.; Wang, X. Molybdenum Carbide-Based Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 10947–10961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. FESEM images of the (a) surface morphology and (b) cross-section of TiO2 NTs.
Figure 1. FESEM images of the (a) surface morphology and (b) cross-section of TiO2 NTs.
Materials 16 06261 g001
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns and (b) XPS survey spectrum of TiO2 NTs; (c) Ti 2p and (d) O 1s spectra of TiO2 NTs.
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns and (b) XPS survey spectrum of TiO2 NTs; (c) Ti 2p and (d) O 1s spectra of TiO2 NTs.
Materials 16 06261 g002
Figure 3. (a) Absorption spectra and (b) band gap determination by Kubelka–Munk plot analysis.
Figure 3. (a) Absorption spectra and (b) band gap determination by Kubelka–Munk plot analysis.
Materials 16 06261 g003
Figure 4. FESEM images of the surface and cross-section, as well as EDX mapping of samples at different concentrations (a1a3) S-1, (b1b3) S-2, (c1c3) S-3 and (d1d3) S-4.
Figure 4. FESEM images of the surface and cross-section, as well as EDX mapping of samples at different concentrations (a1a3) S-1, (b1b3) S-2, (c1c3) S-3 and (d1d3) S-4.
Materials 16 06261 g004
Figure 5. XRD patterns of S-1, S-2, S-3 and S-4.
Figure 5. XRD patterns of S-1, S-2, S-3 and S-4.
Materials 16 06261 g005
Figure 6. (a) UV–Vis absorption spectra and (b) Kubelka–Munk plots for band gap determination of S-1, S-2, S-3 and S-4.
Figure 6. (a) UV–Vis absorption spectra and (b) Kubelka–Munk plots for band gap determination of S-1, S-2, S-3 and S-4.
Materials 16 06261 g006
Figure 7. (a) Photocurrent density and stability under light chopping of TiO2 NTs and S1–S4; (b) EIS spectra of the TiO2 NT and S1–S4 samples; (c) N-type Mott–Schottky plots of TiO2 NTs and S1–S4; (d) ABPE % of TiO2 NTs and S-3.
Figure 7. (a) Photocurrent density and stability under light chopping of TiO2 NTs and S1–S4; (b) EIS spectra of the TiO2 NT and S1–S4 samples; (c) N-type Mott–Schottky plots of TiO2 NTs and S1–S4; (d) ABPE % of TiO2 NTs and S-3.
Materials 16 06261 g007
Figure 8. Proposed mechanism of Mo2C as a cocatalyst in TiO2 NTs self-doped by Ti3+.
Figure 8. Proposed mechanism of Mo2C as a cocatalyst in TiO2 NTs self-doped by Ti3+.
Materials 16 06261 g008
Table 1. Flat band potential (Efb) and donor density (ND) of TiO2 NTs and S-3.
Table 1. Flat band potential (Efb) and donor density (ND) of TiO2 NTs and S-3.
SampleND (×109 cm−3)Efb (V)Band Gap (eV)
TiO2 NT3.7918−0.083.17
S-33.2629−0.122.80
Table 2. Measured parameters of the PEC cell.
Table 2. Measured parameters of the PEC cell.
Sample DetailsPhotocurrent Density (mA cm−2) at 1 V vs. Ag/AgClSolar to Hydrogen Conversion Efficiency, (η %)
TiO2 NT0.230.05
S-31.40.32
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moridon, S.N.F.; Arifin, K.; Mohamed, M.A.; Minggu, L.J.; Mohamad Yunus, R.; Kassim, M.B. TiO2 Nanotubes Decorated with Mo2C for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water-Splitting Properties. Materials 2023, 16, 6261. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186261

AMA Style

Moridon SNF, Arifin K, Mohamed MA, Minggu LJ, Mohamad Yunus R, Kassim MB. TiO2 Nanotubes Decorated with Mo2C for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water-Splitting Properties. Materials. 2023; 16(18):6261. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186261

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moridon, Siti Nurul Falaein, Khuzaimah Arifin, Mohamad Azuwa Mohamed, Lorna Jeffery Minggu, Rozan Mohamad Yunus, and Mohammad B. Kassim. 2023. "TiO2 Nanotubes Decorated with Mo2C for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water-Splitting Properties" Materials 16, no. 18: 6261. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186261

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop