Next Article in Journal
Multi-Objective Optimization in Ultrasonic Polishing of Silicon Carbide via Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Antipathogenic Applications of Copper Nanoparticles in Air Filtration Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Theoretical and Experimental Analyses on the Sound Absorption Coefficient of Rice and Buckwheat Husks Based on Micro-CT Scan Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Piezoresistive Performance of Carbon Nanotube/Carbon Black/Polyvinylidene Fluoride Composite
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 16
10.3390/ma16165672
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Three-Dimensional-Printed Photocatalytic Sponges Decorated with Mn-Doped ZnO Nanoparticles

by
Nikolaos Rafael Vrithias
1,2,
Klytaimnistra Katsara
1,3,
Lampros Papoutsakis
1,4,
Vassilis M. Papadakis
1,5,
Zacharias Viskadourakis
1,
Ioannis N. Remediakis
1,2 and
George Kenanakis
1,*
1
Institute of Electronic Structure and Laser, Foundation for Research & Technology-Hellas, N. Plastira 100, 700 13 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
2
Department of Materials Science and Technology, University of Crete, 710 03 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
3
Department of Agriculture, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Estavromenos, 714 10 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
4
Department of Chemistry, University of Crete, 710 03 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
5
Department of Industrial Design and Production Engineering, University of West Attica, 122 43 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(16), 5672; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165672
Submission received: 22 July 2023 / Revised: 12 August 2023 / Accepted: 15 August 2023 / Published: 18 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Nanomaterials for a Better Life (Volume II))
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The present work reports on the fabrication of high-density polyethylene sponges, decorated with Mn-doped ZnO nanostructures. The sponges were developed utilizing three-dimensional printing technology, while Mn-doped ZnO nanostructures, with varying doping levels, were grown at mild temperatures. The nanostructures were fully characterized by means of scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and Raman spectroscopy, revealing the existence of Mn doping. Moreover, their photocatalytic properties were investigated using the degradation/decolorization of a commercially available liquid laundry detergent, based on synthetic, less foaming ingredients, under UV irradiation. The Mn-doped ZnO nanostructures show better photocatalytic activity at higher doping levels. This study demonstrates that it is possible to achieve the adequate degradation of a typical detergent solution in water by means of low-cost and environmentally friendly approaches, while Mn-doped ZnO/HDPE nanostructures are good candidates for real environmental applications.

1. Introduction

Our planet is mostly covered with water; it is a vital element for human beings and all life on Earth, in general. If we take into account the increases in the population of our planet [1], one can easily understand the need for more clear and pure water, free from harmful substances. However, at the same time, water is polluted in many ways; this can take the form of waste water release by industrial establishments, the mixing of water with fertilizers channeled through groundwater routes [2], pharmaceutical products [3], or even detergent residuals ending up in the sewage system and in the sea, despite the typical purification treatment by municipal establishments.
Detergents have always been in wide-spread use by humans, and their use is expected to expand even more [4]. It should be noted that the development of new types of surfactants, more sustainable than existing ones, the so-called “biosurfactants”, are up to 10–12 times more expensive, and this cost makes the replacement of less sustainable types quite difficult [5].
Several treatment methods are proposed for the elimination of harmful surfactants, such as electrocoagulation [6], nanofiltration [7], sand sorption [8], and others [9]. These approaches offer a solution, but there is always the challenge of making the processes easier and more cost-effective in order to treat large amounts of wastewater and remove detergent compounds from treated water. These residues can be eliminated via oxidation methods, and advanced heterogeneous photocatalysis appears to be the most promising approach, which includes the use of inert catalysts, non-hazardous oxidants, ultraviolet light (UV) and/or visible light input [10,11,12,13,14].
Heterogeneous photocatalysis is a process that generates free radical •OH from atmospheric air, instead of O3 or H2O2, and significantly reduces water processing costs. This approach occurs under ambient conditions and leads to the complete decomposition of both liquid and gaseous pollutants [15,16]. The most important advantage of this process is that universal, environmentally friendly catalysts are inexpensive, non-toxic and photo-stable compared to other photocatalysts, as well as easily available and easily reusable, maintaining the same high performance in a large number of catalyst cycles. On the other hand, the main disadvantage of using photocatalysts in the form of a powder semiconductor is that it must be removed after treatment [17,18]. For this reason, international efforts have been concentrated on photocatalytic systems, in which catalysts are used in the form of film on inert substrates to eliminate powder removal [11,19]. In most cases, however, due to manufacturing technologies limitations and the potential limitation of their use in real-world applications, samples of solid catalysts such as thin films or nanostructures cannot exceed a few centimeters in total size.
In general, photocatalytic samples need to have as high a surface-to-volume ratio as possible as well as the ability to be easily reused. A pathway to achieve this is to employ 3D printing and, more specifically, the fused deposition method (FDM), one of the most commonly utilized low-cost processes due to its simplicity and the availability of machines at affordable prices, in which polymers are the usual materials used as filaments. During this process, a polymeric filament is melted through a heated nozzle and deposited onto a platform in a raster pattern to form each layer of the model, while the final 3D product is fabricated by building up successive layers [20]. Typically, FDM polymeric filaments consist of thermoplastics, such as polylactic acid (PLA), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), etc. [20].
Although polymers are widely available, commercial FDM materials are still limited, expensive, and lack good properties, causing significant difficulties in the use of FDM technology in production [21,22]. ABS is a fairly light polymer and is therefore easier to mold into complex shapes but requires the addition of Butadiene to be chemically resistant, which is extremely toxic and harmful to humans and animals. On the other hand, PLA cannot be recycled and mixed with common polymers, it must be sorted separately and brought to a “closed composting environment”, since it otherwise contaminates the recycling stream [23,24]. Furthermore, PLA cannot be used for high temperature applications, since it has low heat resistance. At high temperatures, PLA deforms rapidly, especially under pressure, while it is typically weaker and has lower tensile strength than its counterpart, ABS [25].
In contrast to the above polymers, polyethylene (PE) and especially high-density polyethylene (HDPE) have excellent toughness, cut resistance, and wear resistance and are well-known for their good chemical resistance [26]. Furthermore, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved HDPE as a BPA-free polymer that does not leach into its contents, providing quite high guarantee for preserving drinking water quality and reducing the possibility of spillage of waste water into the environment [27].
Although there are several reports on 3D structures for novel environmental applications using a variety of polymers [28,29,30,31,32], there is no record based on HDPE filaments used in FDM technology for environmental applications and especially for the removal of residual detergents by photocatalysis.
In this work, we present the fabrication of FDM 3D-printed sponges, fabricated using pure high-density polyethylene (HDPE), decorated with state-of-the-art photocatalysts. Sponge-like geometries were chosen in order to make visible the fabrication of porous samples, suitable for filtering in water treatment systems. The combination of such sponges of various porous sizes with effective photocatalysts gives the opportunity to clean water in a single stage; different solid materials (such as sand, gravel, charcoal, etc.) can be retained and separated through filtering, while dissolved particles and germs (such as chemicals, parasites, bacteria, viruses, etc.) can be eliminated through UV-assisted photocatalysis. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) has been one of the most studied photocatalysts, among several materials, as it has a band gap of about 3.2 eV, high photocatalytic efficiency, chemical and optical stability, etc. [33,34]. Meanwhile, zinc oxide (ZnO) has attracted tremendous interest as an efficient photocatalytic material because of its energy level, which is comparable to the band gap of TiO2 [35]; electron mobility; high life expectancy; and relatively low production cost. Furthermore, compared to TiO2, ZnO can be fabricated in powder form [36] or as a coating on top of numerous substrates [37,38], following environmentally friendly chemical approaches. Finally, ZnO can form multipurpose nanostructures on different substrates, changing from prisms and rods [39] to wires [39], and it can absorb more light quanta [40].
The present study focuses on the decoration of 3D-printed sponge-like scaffolds with pure and Mn-doped ZnO nanostructures, designed to work as photocatalytic devices for the degradation of a commercially available liquid laundry detergent, based on synthetic, less foaming ingredients; Dixan (Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, Düsseldorf, Germany). Here, four types of ZnO-based nanomaterials containing 0.0, 1.0, 5.0, and 10.0 wt% of manganese were synthesized following an aqueous solution growth approach at 95 °C. Mn was chosen as a dopant element of ZnO in order to produce high-efficiency photocatalysts with enhanced performance due to their lower energy gap, compared to pure ZnO (0.16%) under UV light. We provide evidence that doping ZnO with an optimal amount of Mn leads to a decrease in the band gap [41], following a low-temperature, environmentally friendly approach. The structural properties of the prepared samples were studied using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy, while their morphology and elemental composition was examined by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The photocatalytic properties of the nanomaterial-based 3D-printed samples were evaluated using commercially available Dixan as the target pollutant in an aqueous solution under ultraviolet (UV) light in a self-designed photocatalytic reactor.
It is envisioned that our work may provide a new approach for preparing nanosized Mn-doped ZnO photocatalysts on 3D-printed sponge-like filters, suitable for practical applications.

2. Experimental Part

2.1. Fabrication of 3D-Printed Sponges

The drawings of sponge-shaped scaffolds, such as those pictured in Figure 1, were designed using the free online 3D modeling program “Tinkercad” (Autodesk Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA). Subsequently, a “Makerbot Replicator 2X” FDM 3D printer (MakerBot Industries, Brooklyn, NY, USA) was used for the fabrication of 3D structures/scaffolds. Commercially available HDPE filament (3D-Printerstore, Weinfelden, Switzerland) was used as spool material for the printing process. During printing, the nozzle temperature was kept at 220 °C, while the printing bed temperature was at 110 °C. Each printing layer was 0.2 mm and the filling factor was fixed at 100% in order to develop fully packed samples.
According to the above-mentioned method, sponge-like 3D-printed samples were designed, and both their geometry and dimensions are presented in Figure 1. A tetrahedral unit cell was used as a starting element and several units were put together in space to form porous structures with typical dimensions 100 mm × 70 mm × 5 mm.
A solid network of HDPE lines, with random interlinks among them, was developed. Additionally, pores/holes, with diameters ranging from ~0.2 mm to 1.0 mm to 2.0 mm, were inhomogeneously formatted, between interlinked HDPE lines. Therefore, scaffolds of sponge-like structure were successfully grown using 3D printing technology.

2.2. Synthesis of Photocatalytic Nanostructures—Decoration of HDPE Sponges

Mn-doped nanostructures were grown, employing the so-called aqueous solution growth on the 3D-printed sponges mentioned above [42,43,44]. An equimolar (0.01 M) aqueous solution of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O and C6H12N4 was used, while manganese (II) nitrate tetrahydrate (Mn(NO3)2·4H2O) (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) served as the dopant source. The Mn molar concentration in the solution varied from 0 to 10%. First, laboratory Pyrex glass bottles with autoclavable polypropylene screw caps were filled with the solution described above. In addition, pieces of the 3D-printed sponges produced were also placed in the bottles and heated at a constant temperature of 95 °C for 5 h in a regular laboratory oven. In such a way, Mn–ZnO nanostructures were developed directly onto the sponge scaffolds. After heating, the samples were then thoroughly washed with MilliQ water (18.2 MΩ cm) and dried in air at the same temperature.

2.3. Characterization and Photocatalytic Experiments

2.3.1. Optical and Scanning Electron Microscopy

The surface morphology of the ZnO-coated 3D-printed structures was studied using an AP-8 optical microscope (Euromex Microscopen bv., Arnhem, The Netherlands), achieving magnifications up to ×80. Furthermore, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, JEOL JSM-7000F; JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Microscopy characterization was performed in high vacuum (HV) using ~10 nm Au/Pd-coated samples.

2.3.2. X-ray Diffraction X-ray

X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to determine the crystal structure of the prepared Mn-doped ZnO-coated 3D-printed structures using a Bruker D8 Advance Diffractometer (Bruker AXS Advanced X-ray Solutions GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany). The device was equipped with TWIN-TWIN technology and a Cu-sealed tube source (wavelength 1.54 Å). The diffraction data were recorded in theta–2theta mode in the range 30–70 degrees for 2theta, with step 0.02 degrees and speed 3 s/step, while the samples were placed on a Si wafer to minimize background noise.

2.3.3. Raman Spectroscopy Studies

Raman spectroscopy measurements were performed at room temperature using a Horiba LabRAM HR Evolution confocal microspectrometer (HORIBA FRANCE SAS, Longjumeau, France), via backscattering geometry (180°), equipped with an air-cooled solid state laser (HORIBA FRANCE SAS, Longjumeau, France), operating at 532 nm with 90 mW output power. Each sample was placed on a stainless steel microscope slide and the laser beam was focused on the samples, through a 25% ND filter, using a 10× Olympus MPlan microscope objective (OLYMPUS Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) (numerical aperture of 0.25), resulting in a ~11 mW power on each sample. Raman spectra over the 200–1200 cm−1 wavenumber range (with an exposure time of 5 s and 3 accumulations) were collected by a Peltier cooled CCD (1024 × 256 pixels) detector at −60 °C. The size of the laser spot, referring to the microscope resolution, was approximately 2.596 μm, resulting in a Raman spectral resolution of ~2 cm−1, achieved thanks to a 600 grooves/mm grating and an 800 mm focal length. Test measurements carried out using different optical configuration, exposure time, beam power, and accumulations to obtain sufficiently informative spectra using a confocal hole of 100 μm but avoiding alteration of the sample, while the high spatial resolution allowed us to carefully verify the sample homogeneity. The wavelength scale was calibrated using a Silicon standard (Silchem Handelsgesellschaft mbH, Freiberg, Germany) (520.7 cm−1) and the acquired spectra were compared with published scientific data and reference databases, such as Horiba LabSpec 6 (HORIBA FRANCE SAS, Longjumeau, France).

2.3.4. Photocatalytic Efficiency Measurements

The photocatalytic activity of the 3D-printed samples was studied by means of the reduction of an aqueous solution of Dixan (Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, Düsseldorf, Germany), obtained from a local supermarket in Greece. First, 1 mL of commercially available laundry detergent Dixan (code “Ocean”) was diluted in 12 mL of tap water (~8.33% v/v). Subsequently, Mn–ZnO-decorated 3D-printed samples (1 × 1 cm2) were placed in a custom-made quartz cell, and the whole setup (cell + solution + sample) was illuminated for up to 60 min using a UV lamp centered at 365 nm (Philips HPK 125 W) (msscientific Chromatographie-Handel GmbH, Berlin, Germany) with a light intensity of ~6.0 mW/cm2. The concentration of Dixan (decolorization) was monitored via UV–Vis spectroscopy in absorption mode (absorption at λmax, 353 nm), using a “BIOBASE BK-D590” Double Beam Scanning UV/VIS Spectrophotometer (BIOBASE, Jinan, Shandong, China), over a wavelength range of 190–1100 nm, using a 1200 lines/mm grating. In such a way, UV–Vis absorption data were collected at 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min, while the quantification of Dixan degradation (and hence the remained Dixan concentration) was estimated via the calculation of the area below the main absorption peak in the range of 280–400 nm. Photolysis (blank experiments without a catalyst), as well as Dixan adsorption experiments in dark, were performed. To ensure repeatability, the photocatalysis experiments were performed at least five times.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows a typical optical microscopy picture of the 3D-printed sponges. It can be seen that the 3D-printed sponges consist of an HDPE network with pores/holes of the order of 0.05–0.2 mm along with bigger ones (>1.0 mm), in agreement with the 3D model in Figure 1.
Figure 3 depicts SEM micrographs of the 3D-printed sponges, before (Figure 3a,b) and after their decoration with Mn–ZnO (Figure 3c). Highly porous HDPE structures were observed, which is typical for their sponge-like nature. The diameter of the pores/hole layers was in the range of 50–200 μm. Compared to Figure 1, it can be concluded that 3D-printed sponges include small (50–200 µm) as well large (1.0–2.0 mm) pores/holes, which are inhomogeneously distributed, resulting in a bimodal pore/hole mixture. Figure 3c shows typical Mn–ZnO nanostructures (for 10% Mn doping), which were grown on the sponges. It is worth noting that Mn-doping did not influence the geometry of the nanostructures. The grown structures consist of nanorods with diameters ranging from 0.8 to 1.0 μm and a length of ∼8–10μm, and they are similar to the un-doped ZnO nanostructures reported elsewhere [45]. Therefore, the Mn–ZnO nanostructure decoration of the 3D-printed HDPE sponges was successfully accomplished.
Figure 4 presents the XRD pattern of the typical samples prepared (i.e., pure ZnO, black curve; 10% Mn–ZnO, red curve). The XRD pattern of the pure ZnO sample is consistent with the hexagonal wurtzite (JCPDS No. 80-0075). There are no obvious MnO diffraction peaks, indicating that Mn2+ ions are incorporated into the crystal structure of ZnO, which is likely coupled with the low concentration of Mn(II) on the surface of the ZnO [46,47,48]. A closer look of the XRD peak positions indicates a slight shifting of the diffraction peaks in Mn-doped ZnO, compared to that of pure ZnO, toward lower 2θ values. According to Bragg’s law (i.e., 2d sin θ = nλ), since the Zn2+ ion radius (0.74 Å) is smaller than that of the Mn2+ (i.e., 0.8 Å) [49,50], the Mn2+ doping thus increases the lattice constant [51]. As a result, the XRD peaks shift slightly to lower angles [50,52,53], as indicated in Figure 4.
Raman spectra of pure and Mn-doped ZnO nanostructures were investigated in the range 250–750 cm−1, as shown in Figure 5.
We can observe common phonon modes for pure ZnO and Mn-doped nanostructures, typical for a wurtzite structure with a C6v point group symmetry, centered at around 330, 407, 439, 582, and 660 cm−1, and are attributed to the processes E2 (high), A1 (TO), E1 (TO), E2 (high), 1LO, and TA + LO, respectively [54,55,56,57,58]. The 1LO mode corresponds to the superimposition of A1 (LO) and E1 (LO), which are characteristic of the presence of randomly-oriented ZnO crystals, while the strong peak at 439 cm−1 is associated with the high-frequency E2 mode of oxygen atoms and indicates a ZnO wurtzite hexagonal phase [55,59], which was confirmed using XRD. Finally, if one looks carefully at Figure 5a and the zoom plot of Figure 5b, one can notice a shift in the E2 (high) and A1 (TO) modes towards higher frequencies, i.e., from 439.01 to 440.78 cm−1 and from 407.13 to 418.91 cm−1, respectively, due to Mn-doping [60,61,62].
After their optical and structural characterization, the Mn–ZnO-decorated sponges were studied in terms of their photocatalytic properties. In particular, the reduction/decolorization of liquid laundry detergent in aqueous solution was evaluated via the photocatalytic activity of Mn-doped ZnO nanostructures under UV–A light. The photolysis of the detergent in the absence of any photocatalyst was negligible, indicating the indispensability of the catalysts. The detergent solution gradually faded as the photocatalytic process was carried out, which obviously indicated that the detergent concentration decreased. This phenomenon can be attributed to the destruction of the entire molecular structure or to the destruction of the chromophore. Furthermore, to eliminate the possibility of detergent removal through adsorption to the catalysts, the samples were placed at the bottom of the reactor in dark conditions and were left in contact with the detergent solution for 30 min, during which time the equilibrium of adsorption–desorption was achieved. In all cases, removal was insignificant (less than 3%), indicating that the reduction of the Dixan solution should be attributed to a pure photocatalytic procedure.
An example of the typical decrease in detergent concentration (8.33% v/v) in the presence of ZnO/Mn–ZnO nanostructures under UV–A light irradiation is presented in Supplementary Figure S1, indicating that 30 min are sufficient for the adequate degradation of the detergent’s solution. The quantification of detergent degradation (and hence the remaining Dixan concentration) was estimated through the calculation of the area below the main absorption peak in the range of 280–400 nm. The decrease in detergent concentration (decolorization) for pure and Mn-doped ZnO nanostructures under UV–A light was compared to photolysis (no catalyst present) for ~60 min of irradiation, indicating that the photolysis of Dixan was almost negligible.
In addition, the apparent rate constants (k) were calculated as the basic kinetic parameters for the comparison of photocatalytic activities, which were fitted using the following equation:
ln (Ct/C0) = −kt
where k is the apparent rate constant, Ct is the concentration of Dixan, and C0 is its initial concentration.
The apparent rate k follows a good linear fit of Equation (1) (Supplementary Figure S2), indicating that the degradation/decolorization of the detergent follows first-order kinetics. Furthermore, it should be noted that the adjusted R-square statistic for the calculation of the apparent rate constants varied from 0.884 to 0.990, indicating that the model used for the determination of the apparent rate constant (k) is adequate.
Figure 6 indicates the apparent rate constants for detergent using pure and Mn-doped ZnO deposited on 3D-printed sponges.
The apparent rate constant for pure ZnO (nominal %Mn = 0) is ~0.0289, considerably lower than the ones of the Mn-doped samples (nominal %Mn = 2–10). Furthermore, one can easily see that as the nominal %Mn increases, the degradation/decolorization of the detergent becomes faster, reaching a maximum k value of 0.0609.
The above finding indicates that Mn-doping was indeed successful, as indicated in Figure 4 and Figure 5. As we already stated, Mn-doping did not influence the geometry of the nanostructures. As a result, the photocatalytic enhancement of the Mn-doped samples over the pure ZnO ones is probably be due to Mn, since Mn doping decreases the energy gap of ZnO from ~3.4 eV [54] to ~3.0 eV for 10% Mn [63], thus making Mn-doped ZnO a better candidate for photocatalytic applications [64,65,66].
In order to verify the use of our samples for real-life applications, their stability was tested under the same conditions; we recovered each sample and tested their efficiency over three runs. Figure 7 depicts the re-use of the 10% Mn-doped ZnO samples deposited on 3D-printed sponges over three runs.
It is evident that the 10% Mn-doped ZnO samples on 3D printed sponges can be successfully used at least three times for the photodegradation (decolorization) of Dixan, reaching an efficiency of ~88% at the end of the third run.

4. Conclusions

Mn-doped ZnO nanostructures with hexagonal crystal structures were grown on 3D-printed HDPE sponges at mild temperatures of as low as 95 °C, with a dopant nominal concentration ranging from 0.0 to 10.0%. The samples were characterized via SEM, XRD, and Raman spectroscopy, revealing the existence of manganese at the zinc sites in the Mn-doped ZnO nanostructures. The Mn-doped ZnO nanostructured samples display better photocatalytic activity against a commercially available liquid laundry detergent, based on synthetic, less foaming ingredients, under UV irradiation when the doping level is higher (10 at%). This better photocatalytic efficiency at higher doping levels is due to the interstitial incorporation of Mn and Zn, as evidenced by the X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman results.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma16165672/s1, Figure S1: Typical absorption spectra of photocatalytic degradation of 8.33% v/v Dixan aqueous solution in the presence of ZnO/Mn–ZnO nanostructures under UV–A light irradiation; Figure S2: Apparent rate constants (k) of Dixan degradation using Mn-doped ZnO nanostructures deposited on 3D-printed sponges.

Author Contributions

G.K. original concept; N.R.V. and G.K. initial draft of the paper; N.R.V., K.K., L.P., V.M.P., Z.V., I.N.R. and G.K. processing and data analysis; Z.V., I.N.R. and G.K., formal analysis and investigation; G.K. validation, supervision, coordination, project administration and funding acquisition. All authors have equally contributed to the writing, review, and editing process of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by proposal number 101092339 (Exploit4InnoMat), under the call: HORIZON-CL4-2022-RESILIENCE-01 (topic: HORIZON-CL4-2022-RESILIENCE-01-20; type of action: HORIZON-IA). This project received funding from the Operational Program Fisheries and Maritime 2014–2020 within the framework of the project “Innovative materials for nets for fish farming with environmentally friendly antifouling action”, MIS 5029684.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with respect to the publication of this manuscript.

References

  1. Tripathi, S.K.; Tyagi, R.; Nandi, B.K. Removal of Residual Surfactants from Laundry Wastewater: A Review. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2013, 34, 1526–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Singh, J.; Yadav, P.; Pal, A.K.; Mishra, V. Water Pollutants: Origin and Status. In Sensors in Water Pollutants Monitoring: Role of Material; Pooja, D., Kumar, P., Singh, P., Patil, S., Eds.; Advanced Functional Materials and Sensors; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sevastaki, M.; Suchea, M.P.; Kenanakis, G. 3D Printed Fully Recycled TiO2-Polystyrene Nanocomposite Photocatalysts for Use against Drug Residues. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Detergent Chemicals Market Size, Growth, Report 2021–2030. Available online: https://www.precedenceresearch.com/detergent-chemicals-market (accessed on 24 January 2023).
  5. Drakontis, C.E.; Amin, S. Biosurfactants: Formulations, properties, and applications. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 48, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ge, J.; Qu, J.; Lei, P.; Liu, H. New bipolar electrocoagulation–electroflotation process for the treatment of laundry wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 36, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kowalska, I. Surfactant removal from water solutions by means of ultrafiltration and ion-exchange. Desalination 2008, 221, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khan, M.N.; Zareen, U. Sand sorption process for the removal of sodium dodecyl sulfate (anionic surfactant) from water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 133, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ariapad, A.; Zanjanchi, M.; Arvand, M. Efficient removal of anionic surfactant using partial template-containing MCM-41. Desalination 2012, 284, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Demeestere, K.; Dewulf, J.; Van Langenhove, H. Heterogeneous Photocatalysis as an Advanced Oxidation Process for the Abatement of Chlorinated, Monocyclic Aromatic and Sulfurous Volatile Organic Compounds in Air: State of the Art. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 37, 489–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Muñoz-Batista, M.J.; Luque, R. Heterogeneous Photocatalysis. Chemengineering 2021, 5, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hashimoto, K.; Irie, H.; Fujishima, A. TiO2 Photocatalysis: A Historical Overview and Future Prospects. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 44, 8269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kenanakis, G.; Katsarakis, N. Light-induced photocatalytic degradation of stearic acid by c-axis oriented ZnO nanowires. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2010, 378, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mills, A.; Lee, S.-K. A web-based overview of semiconductor photochemistry-based current commercial applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2002, 152, 233–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Konstantinou, I.K.; Albanis, T.A. Photocatalytic transformation of pesticides in aqueous titanium dioxide suspensions using artificial and solar light: Intermediates and degradation pathways. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2003, 42, 319–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tanaka, K.; Padermpole, K.; Hisanaga, T. Photocatalytic degradation of commercial azo dyes. Water Res. 2000, 34, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Liu, J.; Ma, M.; Chen, W.; Li, L. Activated carbon supported TiO2-photocatalysis doped with Fe ions fo continuous treatment of dye wastewater in a dynamic reactor. J. Environ. Sci. 2010, 22, 1290–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. van Grieken, R.; Marugán, J.; Sordo, C.; Martínez, P.; Pablos, C. Photocatalytic inactivation of bacteria in water using suspended and immobilized silver-TiO2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2009, 93, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mills, A.; Elliott, N.; Hill, G.; Fallis, D.; Durrant, J.R.; Willis, R.L. Preparation and characterisation of novel thick sol-gel titania film photocatalysts. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2003, 2, 591–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liao, G.; Li, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Xu, D.; Zhu, D.; Jiang, S.; Guo, J.; Chen, X.; Xu, G.; Zhu, Y. Properties of oriented carbon fiber/polyamide 12 composite parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Mater. Des. 2018, 139, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Prabhakar, M.M.; Saravanan, A.; Lenin, A.H.; Leno, I.J.; Mayandi, K.; Ramalingam, P.S. A short review on 3D printing methods, process parameters and materials. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 45, 6108–6114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jin, M.; Giesa, R.; Neuber, C.; Schmidt, H. Filament Materials Screening for FDM 3D Printing by Means of Injection-Molded Short Rods. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2018, 303, 1800507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Arceo, F. Is PLA Recyclable or even Biodegradable?—3D Solved. Available online: https://3dsolved.com/is-pla-recyclable/ (accessed on 3 April 2023).
  24. Majgaonkar, P.; Hanich, R.; Malz, F.; Brüll, R. Chemical Recycling of Post-Consumer PLA Waste for Sustainable Production of Ethyl Lactate. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 423, 129952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rodríguez-Panes, A.; Claver, J.; Camacho, A.M. The Influence of Manufacturing Parameters on the Mechanical Behaviour of PLA and ABS Pieces Manufactured by FDM: A Comparative Analysis. Materials 2018, 11, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. McDaniel, M.P.; DesLauriers, P.J. Ethylene Polymers, HDPE. In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Akhbarizadeh, R.; Dobaradaran, S.; Schmidt, T.C.; Nabipour, I.; Spitz, J. Worldwide bottled water occurrence of emerging contaminants: A review of the recent scientific literature. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 392, 122271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lee, H.U.; Lee, S.C.; Son, B.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, J.W.; Oh, Y.-K.; Kim, Y.; Choi, S.; Lee, Y.-S.; Lee, J. Innovative three-dimensional (3D) eco-TiO2 photocatalysts for practical environmental and bio-medical applications. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ruiz-Morales, J.C.; Tarancón, A.; Canales-Vázquez, J.; Méndez-Ramos, J.; Hernández-Afonso, L.; Acosta-Mora, P.; Rueda, J.R.M.; Fernández-González, R. Three dimensional printing of components and functional devices for energy and environmental applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 846–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Giakoumaki, A.N.; Kenanakis, G.; Klini, A.; Androulidaki, M.; Viskadourakis, Z.; Farsari, M.; Selimis, A. 3D micro-structured arrays of ZnO nanorods. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Skorski, M.R.; Esenther, J.M.; Ahmed, Z.; Miller, A.E.; Hartings, M.R. The chemical, mechanical, and physical properties of 3D printed materials composed of TiO2-ABS nanocomposites. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2016, 17, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Viskadourakis, Z.; Sevastaki, M.; Kenanakis, G. 3D structured nanocomposites by FDM process: A novel approach for large-scale photocatalytic applications. Appl. Phys. A 2018, 124, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Linsebigler, A.L.; Lu, G.; Yates, J.T. Photocatalysis on TiO2 Surfaces: Principles, Mechanisms, and Selected Results. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 735–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Grätzel, M. Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature 2001, 414, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Evans, P.; Mantke, S.; Mills, A.; Robinson, A.; Sheel, D. A comparative study of three techniques for determining photocatalytic activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2007, 188, 387–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Uddin, M.; Hasnat, M.; Samed, A.; Majumdar, R. Influence of TiO2 and ZnO photocatalysts on adsorption and degradation behaviour of Erythrosine. Dye. Pigment. 2007, 75, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Evgenidou, E.; Fytianos, K.; Poulios, I. Semiconductor-sensitized photodegradation of dichlorvos in water using TiO2 and ZnO as catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2005, 59, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, Y.H.; Li, Z.Y.; Wang, B.; Wang, C.X.; Chen, D.H.; Yang, G.W. Self-assembled ZnO agave-like nanowires and anomalous superhydrophobicity. J. Physics Condens. Matter 2005, 17, 5441–5446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sakthivel, S.; Neppolian, B.; Shankar, M.; Arabindoo, B.; Palanichamy, M.; Murugesan, V. Solar photocatalytic degradation of azo dye: Comparison of photocatalytic efficiency of ZnO and TiO2. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2003, 77, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Senthilkumaar, S.; Rajendran, K.; Banerjee, S.; Chini, T.; Sengodan, V. Influence of Mn doping on the microstructure and optical property of ZnO. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2008, 11, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kenanakis, G.; Katsarakis, N. ZnO nanowires on glass via chemical routes: A prospective photocatalyst for indoors applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1416–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Frysali, M.A.; Papoutsakis, L.; Kenanakis, G.; Anastasiadis, S.H. Anastasiadis. Functional Surfaces with Photocatalytic Behavior and Reversible Wettability: ZnO Coating on Silicon Spikes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 25401–25407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Černohorský, O.; Grym, J.; Faitová, H.; Bašinová, N.; Kučerová, S.; Yatskiv, R.; Veselý, J. Modeling of Solution Growth of ZnO Hexagonal Nanorod Arrays in Batch Reactors. Cryst. Growth Des. 2020, 20, 3347–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kenanakis, G.; Vernardou, D.; Koudoumas, E.; Kiriakidis, G.; Katsarakis, N. Ozone sensing properties of ZnO nanostructures grown by the aqueous chemical growth technique. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2007, 124, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tanaka, K.; Fukui, K.; Murai, S.; Fujita, K. Mechanical milling-induced room-temperature ferromagnetic phase in MnO2–ZnO system. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 052501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bhatti, K.P.; Chaudhary, S.; Pandya, D.K.; Kashyap, S.C. On the room-temperature ferromagnetism in (ZnO)0.98(MnO2)0.02. Solid State Commun. 2005, 136, 384–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Putri, N.A.; Fauzia, V.; Iwan, S.; Roza, L.; Umar, A.A.; Budi, S. Mn-doping-induced photocatalytic activity enhancement of ZnO nanorods prepared on glass substrates. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 439, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yan, X.; Hu, D.; Li, H.; Li, L.; Chong, X.; Wang, Y. Nanostructure and optical properties of M doped ZnO (M = Ni, Mn) thin films prepared by sol–gel process. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2011, 406, 3956–3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Verma, A.K.; Singh, D.; Singh, S.; Yadav, R.R. Surfactant-free synthesis and experimental analysis of Mn-doped ZnO–glycerol nanofluids: An ultrasonic and thermal study. Appl. Phys. A 2019, 125, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Renitta, A.; Vijayalakshmi, K. High performance hydrogen sensor based on Mn implanted ZnO nanowires array fabricated on ITO substrate. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 77, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Stefan, M.; Ghica, D.; Nistor, S.V.; Maraloiu, A.V.; Plugaru, R. Mn2+ ions distribution in doped sol–gel deposited ZnO films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 396, 1880–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, D.; Shang, W.; Zhang, B.; Jiang, C.; Qu, F.; Yang, M. Manganese-doped zinc oxide hollow balls for chemiresistive sensing of acetone vapors. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ozgür, Ü.; Alivov, Y.I.; Liu, C.; Teke, A.; Reshchikov, M.A.; Doğan, S.; Avrutin, V.; Cho, S.-J.; Morkoç, H. A comprehensive review of ZnO materials and devices. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 98, 041301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Baranowska-Korczyc, A.; Kościński, M.; Coy, E.L.; Grześkowiak, B.F.; Jasiurkowska-Delaporte, M.; Peplińska, B.; Jurga, S. ZnS coating for enhanced environmental stability and improved properties of ZnO thin films. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 24411–24421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Tanemura, M.; Shishodia, P.K. Ferromagnetism In Sol-gel Derived ZnO: Mn Nanocrystalline Thin Films. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2016, 7, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Akyol, M.; Çetin, S.K.; Ekicibil, A. Microstructural and magnetic properties of Ax:Zn1-xO (A = Mn, Gd and Mn/Gd) nanocrystals. Philos. Mag. 2015, 96, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Vernardou, D.; Kenanakis, G.; Couris, S.; Koudoumas, E.; Kymakis, E.; Katsarakis, N. pH effect on the morphology of ZnO nanostructures grown with aqueous chemical growth. Thin Solid Films 2007, 515, 8764–8767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Phan, T.L.; Vincent, R.; Cherns, D.; Nghia, N.X.; Ursaki, V.V. Raman scattering in Me-doped ZnO nanorods (Me = Mn, Co, Cu and Ni) prepared by thermal diffusion. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 475702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Strelchuk, V.; Kolomys, O.; Rarata, S.; Lytvyn, P.; Khyzhun, O.; Chey, C.O.; Nur, O.; Willander, M. Raman Submicron Spatial Mapping of Individual Mn-doped ZnO Nanorods. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ansari, S.A.; Khan, M.M.; Kalathil, S.; Nisar, A.; Lee, J.; Cho, M.H. Oxygen vacancy induced band gap narrowing of ZnO nanostructures by an electrochemically active biofilm. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 9238–9246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Raskar, N.D.; Dake, D.V.; Mane, V.A.; Stathatos, E.; Deshpande, U.; Dole, B. One step synthesis of vertically grown Mn-doped ZnO nanorods for photocatalytic application. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 10886–10899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shah, W.H.; Alam, A.; Javed, H.; Rashid, K.; Ali, A.; Ali, L.; Safeen, A.; Ali, M.R.; Imran, N.; Sohail, M.; et al. Tuning of the band gap and dielectric loss factor by Mn doping of Zn1-xMnxO nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ab Wahab, N.; Sairi, N.A.; Alias, Y. Photocatalytic activities enhancement of manganese doped ZnO by decoration on CNT for degradation of organic pollutants under solar irradiation. Appl. Phys. A 2021, 128, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Biswas, B.D.; Purkayastha, M.D.; Tiwari, E.; Denrah, S.; Sarkar, M.; Darbha, G.K.; Majumder, T.P. Study of the photocatalytic activity of Mn-doped ZnO nanocomposites depending on their morphology and structure with the variation of manganese concentration. Surf. Interfaces 2021, 23, 100902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Aadnan, I.; Zegaoui, O.; El Mragui, A.; Daou, I.; Moussout, H.; da Silva, J.C.G.E. Structural, Optical and Photocatalytic Properties of Mn Doped ZnO Nanoparticles Used as Photocatalysts for Azo-Dye Degradation under Visible Light. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 16 05672 g001
Figure 1. A 3D model of sponge-like samples: top view (a), magnification (b), and side view (c).
Figure 1. A 3D model of sponge-like samples: top view (a), magnification (b), and side view (c).
Materials 16 05672 g001
Materials 16 05672 g002
Figure 2. Optical microscopy picture of 3D-printed sponges.
Figure 2. Optical microscopy picture of 3D-printed sponges.
Materials 16 05672 g002
Materials 16 05672 g003
Figure 3. SEM images of 3D-printed sponges, prior to (a,b) and after their decoration with Mn–ZnO (c).
Figure 3. SEM images of 3D-printed sponges, prior to (a,b) and after their decoration with Mn–ZnO (c).
Materials 16 05672 g003
Materials 16 05672 g004
Figure 4. XRD pattern of ZnO (black) and Mn-doped ZnO (red) nanostructures deposited on 3D-printed sponges for 5 h at 95 °C.
Figure 4. XRD pattern of ZnO (black) and Mn-doped ZnO (red) nanostructures deposited on 3D-printed sponges for 5 h at 95 °C.
Materials 16 05672 g004
Materials 16 05672 g005
Figure 5. (a) Raman spectra of ZnO (black) and 10% Mn-doped ZnO (red) nanostructures deposited on 3D-printed sponges for 5 h. In (b), one can see a zoom plot of E2 (high) and A1 (TO).
Figure 5. (a) Raman spectra of ZnO (black) and 10% Mn-doped ZnO (red) nanostructures deposited on 3D-printed sponges for 5 h. In (b), one can see a zoom plot of E2 (high) and A1 (TO).
Materials 16 05672 g005
Materials 16 05672 g006
Figure 6. Apparent rate constants for the degradation/decolorization of Dixan using pure and Mn-doped ZnO on 3D-printed sponges, as a functionally nominal %Mn.
Figure 6. Apparent rate constants for the degradation/decolorization of Dixan using pure and Mn-doped ZnO on 3D-printed sponges, as a functionally nominal %Mn.
Materials 16 05672 g006
Materials 16 05672 g007
Figure 7. The % of degradation/decolorization of Dixan over 10% Mn-doped ZnO samples deposited on 3D-printed sponges over three runs of 60 min irradiation each.
Figure 7. The % of degradation/decolorization of Dixan over 10% Mn-doped ZnO samples deposited on 3D-printed sponges over three runs of 60 min irradiation each.
Materials 16 05672 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vrithias, N.R.; Katsara, K.; Papoutsakis, L.; Papadakis, V.M.; Viskadourakis, Z.; Remediakis, I.N.; Kenanakis, G. Three-Dimensional-Printed Photocatalytic Sponges Decorated with Mn-Doped ZnO Nanoparticles. Materials 2023, 16, 5672. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165672

AMA Style

Vrithias NR, Katsara K, Papoutsakis L, Papadakis VM, Viskadourakis Z, Remediakis IN, Kenanakis G. Three-Dimensional-Printed Photocatalytic Sponges Decorated with Mn-Doped ZnO Nanoparticles. Materials. 2023; 16(16):5672. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165672

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vrithias, Nikolaos Rafael, Klytaimnistra Katsara, Lampros Papoutsakis, Vassilis M. Papadakis, Zacharias Viskadourakis, Ioannis N. Remediakis, and George Kenanakis. 2023. "Three-Dimensional-Printed Photocatalytic Sponges Decorated with Mn-Doped ZnO Nanoparticles" Materials 16, no. 16: 5672. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165672

APA Style

Vrithias, N. R., Katsara, K., Papoutsakis, L., Papadakis, V. M., Viskadourakis, Z., Remediakis, I. N., & Kenanakis, G. (2023). Three-Dimensional-Printed Photocatalytic Sponges Decorated with Mn-Doped ZnO Nanoparticles. Materials, 16(16), 5672. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165672

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop