Next Article in Journal
A Modified Bond-Associated Non-Ordinary State-Based Peridynamic Model for Impact Problems of Quasi-Brittle Materials
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Various Adhesive Systems and Polishing Methods on Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets: A Three-Dimensional In Vitro Evaluation
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Carbonated Bottom Slag Granules in 3D Concrete Printing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dual Stimuli-Responsive Orthodontic Aligners: An In Vitro Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Application of a Fluoride-and-Vitamin D Solution to Deciduous Teeth Promotes Formation of Persistent Mineral Crystals: A Morphological Ex-Vivo Study

by
Gianni Di Giorgio
1,†,
Michela Relucenti
2,†,
Flavia Iaculli
3,*,
Alessandro Salucci
1,
Orlando Donfrancesco
2,
Antonella Polimeni
1 and
Maurizio Bossù
1
1
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopaedics, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
3
Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Materials 2023, 16(11), 4049; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114049
Submission received: 28 April 2023 / Revised: 24 May 2023 / Accepted: 27 May 2023 / Published: 29 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials and Techniques in Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Orthodontics)

Abstract

:
Background: The use of effective, low-cost, and easy-to-use products for early caries management will avoid loss of dental vitality and impairment in oral function. The ability of fluoride to re-mineralize dental surfaces has been widely reported as well as vitamin D demonstrated to have significant potential in improving the remineralization of early lesions on enamel surfaces. The aim of the present ex vivo study was to evaluate the effect of a fluoride and vitamin D solution in terms of formation of mineral crystals on the enamel of primary teeth, and their permanence over time on dental surfaces. Methods: Sixteen extracted deciduous teeth were cut to obtain 64 specimens that were divided into two groups. The first consisted of immersion of specimens for 4 days in a fluoride solution (T1); in the second group, the specimens were immersed for 4 days (T1) in fluoride and Vitamin D solution, and for a further 2 (T2) and 4 days (T3) in saline solution. Then, samples were morphologically analyzed by using Variable Pressure Scanning Electron Microscope (VPSEM) and underwent 3D surface reconstruction. Results: After a 4-day immersion in both solutions, octahedral-shaped crystals were formed on the enamel surface of primary teeth, demonstrating any statistically significant differences in terms of number, size, and shape. Moreover, the binding of the same crystals seemed to be strong enough to be maintained until 4 days in saline solution. However, a partial dissolution was observed in a time-dependent manner. Conclusions: A topical application of fluoride and Vitamin D promoted the formation of persistent mineral crystals on enamel surfaces of deciduous teeth and should be further studied to be potentially used as an alternative strategy in preventive dentistry.

1. Introduction

Dental caries is an infective, chronic, degenerative, and multifactorial condition that represents the most prevalent chronic disease worldwide, mainly in children [1,2]. The Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 estimated that oral diseases affect close to 3.5-billion people worldwide, with caries of permanent teeth being the most common condition [3]. Specifically, it has been estimated that 2-billion people suffer from caries of permanent teeth and 520-million children are affected by caries of primary teeth [3]. Despite the preventive strategies mostly adopted in developed countries, in most low- and middle-income areas, the prevalence of oral diseases is still increasing due to expanding urbanization and variation in living conditions. This is mainly caused by inadequate prevention, the availability of food with high sugar content, and limited exposure to oral health national care services [3].
Early caries management, both in deciduous and permeant dentition, should avoid the progressive destruction of dental hard tissue, subsequent loss of dental vitality, and impairment in oral function [4]. This is mostly true for primary teeth—due to anatomical considerations, reduced rate of mineralization, and high prevalence of risk factors—that show a rapid progression of dental caries [2,5]. Human teeth are constantly subjected to a continuous process of de- and re-mineralization, mostly due to pH alteration, cariogenic bacteria, external agents, heat, cold, and sweets, as well as erosive food and drink. The main issue concerning demineralization is that the loss of mineralized dental tissues favors the development of demineralized areas that may evolve in dental caries. This aspect is most prevalent in primary teeth since the enamel appears to be thinner, less mineralized (mineralization of 80.6% in deciduous enamel and 89.7% in permanent enameled teeth), and with not completely formed prisms at the outer layer [6].
The ability of fluoride to re-mineralize dental surfaces has been widely demonstrated within the scientific literature for both permanent and deciduous teeth [7]. Fluoride ions are able to be incorporated within tooth enamel during the dental development phase and, at adequate concentrations, support mineralization and decrease enamel solubility; the resulting fluorapatite on tooth surfaces had been demonstrated to be more resistant to acid attack [8]. Although excessive fluoride assumption may lead to dental fluorosis of permanent teeth, newly developed biomimetic toothpastes have been proposed as valid alternatives to minimize the risk of fluorosis occurrence, providing promising results in preventive dentistry [9,10]. In addition, in cases of poor oral hygiene abilities as well as limited contact between remineralized agents and dental surfaces, different fluoride delivery systems, such as sprays, have been introduced.
Vitamin D, among other functions such as innate immunity effector, plays an important role in the regulation of calcium and phosphate metabolism and their deposition in mineralized tissues [11]. Since the presence of Vitamin D3 receptors on ameloblast and odontoblast cells [12], its function in tooth development and remineralization, changes in the biochemical composition of saliva and immunological modulation of dental infection [13] has been suggested. Moreover, its deficiency has been reported as a risk factor both for the incidence of dental caries and their severity in children [14]. Indeed, Vitamin D has been demonstrated to have significant potential in improving the remineralization of early lesions on enamel surfaces enhancing surface microhardness and minerals content [15], suggesting a topical fluoride-like effect [13].
However, to the best of our knowledge, there are limited data about the effectiveness of fluoride and Vitamin D association in terms of dental caries prevention [16]. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to ex vivo prove the effect of fluoride and Vitamin D association on the enamel surface of human deciduous teeth in terms of mineral crystal formation. In addition, further studies are already planned to test the permanence, deepening of penetration, and remineralization effect of the same solution in an environment that simulates the oral cavity. Finally, a subsequent in-vivo study will elucidate the effectiveness of fluoride and Vitamin D association on enamel surface remineralization of human primary teeth and its role in preventive dentistry.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples Selection and Cutting Procedure

A total of 16 deciduous teeth were extracted for orthodontic reasons or due to physiological replacements at the Pediatric Dentistry Unit of “Sapienza” University of Rome. Parents of all subjects signed an informed consent during the first visit, allowing for the use of extracted teeth for research purposes. The study was conducted under the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of “Sapienza” University of Rome (Prot. 0885/2021 del 14/10/2021). After the exclusion of teeth reporting cracks or defects, specimens were cut with a diamond disk under water-spray irrigation, as previously reported [17]. To create samples with standard dimensions, the crowns of the 16 deciduous teeth were cut forming 64 parallelepipeds of size 4 mm × 4 mm (Figure 1). Then, the 64 specimens were analyzed through an optical microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany, Axioskop 40) at 20× magnification. All experimental procedures were performed by the same operator in the same conditions.

2.2. Experimental Design

The specimens were divided into two groups of 32 samples each. The first group was used as a control and was processed as follows: (a) Observation just after the cutting procedure (T0); (b) Immersion for 4 days in a fluoride solution of 2.625 mg/mL in an oven at 37 °C, then under Variable Pressure Scanning Electron Microscope (VP– SEM) observation (T1). The second group (treated) was processed as follows: (a) Observation just after the cutting (T0); (b) Immersion over 4 days in a solution mainly containing fluoride (same concentration of control group) and Vitamin D3 (FluorD3, Dicofarm, Rome, Italy) in an oven at 37 °C (T1), and then under VP– SEM observation; (c) Immersion in saline solution (sodium chloride 0.9%) for 2 days in an oven at 37 °C, and then under VP– SEM observation (T2); (d) Additional 2 days immersion in saline solution (sodium chloride 0.9%) in an oven at 37 °C, and then under VP– SEM observation (T3) (Figure 2).

2.3. Sample Preparation for Variable Pressure Scanning Electron Microscope (VP–SEM)

Samples were observed without any drying or coating procedure. Specimens were carefully dried at room temperature by resting on a filter paper for 1–2 min. Then, they were mounted onto aluminum stubs by carbon tape and placed in an oven at 37 °C for 2 h before observation with the variable pressure SEM Hitachi SU–3500 (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The observations were performed at operating conditions of 30 Pa and 5 to 10 kV. Images were captured at several magnifications between 500 and 5000×.

2.4. 3D Reconstruction and Surface Analysis Procedure

Crystals surface measurements and 3D reconstructions were carried out on pictures captured at 2000× and 5000× magnification with the aid of Hitachi 3d Map software (Digital Surf, Beçason, France) [18]. Data were analyzed by MedCalc© statistical software Version 22.003 (MedCalc©, Ostende, Belgium).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

To determine the significant differences between crystals’ number and sizes in the control and treated groups, as well as crystals’ number between T1 and T2 and between T2 and T3, t-Test was conducted by MedCalc® Statistical Software version 20.218 (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium; https://www.medcalc.org; (accessed on 10 April 2023).

3. Results

The enamel surface at T0 in both control and treated groups showed furrows due to wear, shallow punctiform microcavities, and lacunae with larger surface areas and depths (Figure 3A). At T1, the enamel surface showed the formation of fluoride crystals with a characteristic octahedron shape within all evaluated samples (Figure 3B).
To verify the ability to form mineral crystals, their number in the control (fluoride solution) and treated group (FluorD3) was appreciated by observing 105 microscopic fields. Results are reported in Table 1.
Then, the number of crystals formed after immersion for 4 days in control and test solutions was compared by a t-Test. The crystals number did not show any statistically significant difference (t-Test p = 0.4663) (Figure 4), suggesting that the presence of Vitamin D3 had no significant effect on crystals’ number formation.
The formed crystals’ shape was evaluated by panoramic views of the samples’ surfaces at low magnifications (Figure 5). The shape of all observed crystals in both groups was a typical octahedron.
Then, the crystals’ size was detected by the software Hitachi Mountains 3D, measuring the size of 150 crystals with the same orientation to avoid biases. Results are reported in Table 2.
Comparison of crystals’ size did not show any statistically significant difference (t-Test p = 0.2011) (Figure 6).
Observing crystals at higher magnifications (Figure 7), they seemed to originate by crystallizing on the enamel surface microcavities, which serve as nucleation sites. The crystals then grew on the enamel surface in different orientations, some having a vertex in the microcavities, and the rest as free. In other cases, crystals grew by keeping their half anchored to the enamel (with two vertices and the side between them).
To test whether the binding of crystals to the enamel surface was strong enough to ensure their position over time, specimens were kept in a saline solution for 2 days and then observed. Analyzing the same 105 microscopic fields in the same samples at T1 and T2, the crystal number did not show any statistically significant difference (t-Test p = 0.2231) (Table 3, Figure 8). These results indicated that the bond between the crystal and enamel surface was sufficiently stable to keep the crystals adhering to the enamel surface after 2 days of immersion in saline solution.
To evaluate crystals’ surface characteristics and size changes, and their total or partial dissolution, the size of 15 crystals present in the same microscopic fields at T1 and T2 was measured by Hitachi Mountains 3D software. The 3D reconstruction in Figure 9 shows that in T2, the size, shape, and roughness were different than that in T1, probably indicating an erosion process.
To achieve a more precise quantitative evaluation, the size of each crystal was measured at T1 and T2, and a t-Test between the values was performed. Data showed that the size of every single crystal in T2 was inferior to the respective size in T1, and t-Test results demonstrated that this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Our data showed that the crystals have partially dissolved and lost an average percentage of 26% of their size after 2 days in saline solution (Table 4 and Figure 10).
The crystals’ 3D surface reconstruction in Figure 11 shows that at T2, the surface presented more areas of blue and dark green (lower-level areas) than T1, where yellow (high-level areas) and light-green areas (middle-level areas) prevailed. This meant that crystals had lower sizes and a different, more porous aspect.
To verify the trend of size decreasing and surface changes in the function of time, the size of 15 other crystals (different from the ones previously observed) at T2 and T3 was measured by using Hitachi Mountains 3D software. The 3D reconstruction in Figure 12 shows that in T3, the sizes, shape, and roughness were different than that in T2, stressing a further development of the erosion process.
To quantify the changes, the size of each crystal was measured at T2 and T3, and a t-Test between the values was performed. Data showed that the size of every single crystal in T3 was inferior to the respective size in T2, and the t-Test result demonstrated that this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Our data showed that the crystals had partially dissolved and lost an average percentage of 38% of their size after 4 days in saline solution (Table 5 and Figure 13).
The 3D surface reconstruction in Figure 14 shows that at T3, the crystal surface presented no white areas (high-level areas), whereas red and light-green areas (middle- and ground-level areas) prevailed. This meant that crystals had a marked lowering in size.

4. Discussion

Prevention strategies should be applied to reduce risk factors related to the onset and further development of dental caries, mainly in the early phase of childhood [19]. The preschool period occurs at a time in which deleterious oral habits, caries patterns, and risk factors are established, reporting a prevalence of around 30–80% [20]. In addition, limited oral health significantly impaired children’s nutrition and, in turn, general health and development, causing notable economic, public, and individual issues [21]. Childhood dental caries may be in relation to not only the children’s oral health-related quality of life, but also their parents’ [22]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study aimed at evaluating the behavior of fluoride and Vitamin D on enamel surfaces of human primary teeth. The present ultrastructural morphological analysis revealed that after a 4-day immersion of fluoride and Vitamin D solution, octahedral-shaped crystals were formed on the enamel surface without any statistically significant differences with a fluoride solution used as a control in terms of crystals’ number, shape, or size. Moreover, the binding of the same crystals on enamel seemed to be strong enough to be maintained until 4 days in a saline solution. However, a partial dissolution was appreciated in a time-dependent manner. Although the present study only provided an objective observation (the outcomes should be considered preliminary), the dissolution behavior over time might suggest that, in a clinical condition, the solution should be daily renewed to guarantee an efficient contact between the components and the enamel surface. In addition, following the hypothesis that the association of both fluoride and Vitamin D might be considered a valid alternative in preventive dentistry, their clinical use would be supported. Accordingly, Kühnisch et al. [16] reported promising results in terms of a lower probability of dental caries in primary dentition, as well as molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH) when children underwent Fluoride/Vitamin D tablet supplementation during the first year of life. In addition, the same authors observed no effects on permanent dentition 10 years after the administration, suggesting only the preventive role of fluoride and Vitamin D association with the absence of further damages [16]. As suggested by the present study, the topical application of the same components should overcome drawbacks related to an excessive assumption of fluoride, mainly in children of less than 5 years of age, who are more at risk of fluorosis occurrence due to the swallowing of a high amount of fluoride toothpaste during the mineralization phase of permanent teeth [23]. In addition, an easy topical delivery system might have a positive effect on the extension of early childhood caries prevention, as well as an economic impact on health care services.
The present study was based on the rationale that, alone, fluoride and Vitamin D positively act on enamel surface remineralization. However, according to the provided preliminary results, it only proved the presence and maintenance of mineral crystals on enamel surfaces. Moreover, although the use of saline solution was chosen to establish the crystal formation kinetics without the possible interference made by saliva and its components, its presence would have better reproduced the oral environment, representing a main limitation of the work. Therefore, further ex-vivo and in-vivo studies are already planned to demonstrate the deepening of penetration and the surface remineralization potential, and to show as a combination of topically administered fluoride and Vitamin D may be considered a valid alternative in preventive dentistry.

5. Conclusions

Within the limitations of the present study, it could be concluded that the topical application of fluoride and Vitamin D promoted the formation of persistent mineral crystals on enamel surfaces of deciduous teeth and should be further evaluated to be potentially used as an alternative strategy in preventive dentistry.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B., G.D.G. and M.R.; methodology, M.R. and F.I.; software, A.S.; validation, G.D.G., M.R. and M.B.; formal analysis, M.R. and O.D.; investigation, A.S.; data curation, F.I. and O.D.; writing—original draft preparation, F.I.; writing—review and editing, A.P.; visualization, A.S. and M.R.; supervision, M.B. and A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of “Sapienza” University of Rome (Prot. 0885/2021 del 14/10/2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patients to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health. Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health. Rockville, MD, USA. 2000. Available online: https://www.nidcr.nih.gov/sites/default/files/2017-10/hck1ocv.%40www.surgeon.fullrpt.pdf (accessed on 22 April 2023).
  2. Smaïl-Faugeron, V.; Porot, A.; Muller-Bolla, M.; Courson, F. Indirect pulp capping versus pulpotomy for treating deep carious lesions approaching the pulp in primary teeth: A systematic review. Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2016, 17, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019); Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME): Seattle, WA, USA, 2020; Available online: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool (accessed on 22 April 2023).
  4. Selwitz, R.H.; Ismail, A.I.; Pitts, N.B. Dental caries. Lancet 2007, 369, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy on early childhood caries (ECC): Classifications, consequences, and preventive strategies. Pediatr. Dent. 2008, 30, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
  6. De Menezes Oliveira, M.A.; Torres, C.P.; Gomes-Silva, J.M.; Chinelatti, M.A.; De Menezes, F.C.; Palma-Dibb, R.G.; Borsatto, M.C. Microstructure and Mineral Composition of Dental Enamel of Permanent and Deciduous Teeth. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2010, 73, 572–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Walsh, T.; Worthington, H.V.; Glenny, A.M.; Marinho, V.C.; Jeroncic, A. Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019, 3, CD007868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aulestia, F.J.; Groeling, J.; Bomfim, G.H.S.; Costiniti, V.; Manikandan, V.; Chaloemtoem, A.; Concepcion, A.R.; Li, Y.; Wagner, L.E., 2nd; Idaghdour, Y.; et al. Fluoride exposure alters Ca2+ signaling and mitochondrial function in enamel cells. Sci. Signal 2020, 13, eaay0086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bossù, M.; Saccucci, M.; Salucci, A.; Di Giorgio, G.; Bruni, E.; Uccelletti, D.; Sarto, M.S.; Familiari, G.; Relucenti, M.; Polimeni, A. Enamel Remineralization and Repair Results of Biomimetic Hydroxyapatite Toothpaste on Deciduous Teeth: An Effective Option to Fluoride Toothpaste. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2019, 17, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bossù, M.; Matassa, R.; Relucenti, M.; Iaculli, F.; Salucci, A.; Di Giorgio, G.; Familiari, G.; Polimeni, A.; Di Carlo, S. Morpho-Chemical Observations of Human Deciduous Teeth Enamel in Response to Biomimetic Toothpastes Treatment. Materials 2020, 13, 1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gyll, J.; Ridell, K.; Öhlund, I.; Åkeson, P.K.; Johansson, I.; Lif Holgerson, P. Vitamin D status and dental caries in healthy Swedish children. Nutr. J. 2018, 17, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Berdal, A.; Papagerakis, P.; Hotton, D.; Bailleul-Forestier, I.; Davideau, J.L. Ameloblasts and odontoblasts, target-cells for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3: A review. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 1995, 39, 257–262. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hujoel, P.P. Vitamin D and dental caries in controlled clinical trials: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr. Rev. 2013, 71, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chhonkar, A.; Gupta, A.; Arya, V. Comparison of Vitamin D Level of Children with Severe Early Childhood Caries and Children with No Caries. Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2018, 11, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Al-Jubori, S.; AL-Murad, M.A.; Al-Mashhadane, F. Effect of Oral Vitamin D3 on Dental Caries: An In-Vivo and In-Vitro Study. Cureus 2022, 14, e25360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kühnisch, J.; Thiering, E.; Heinrich-Weltzien, R.; Hellwig, E.; Hickel, R.; Heinrich, J. Fluoride/vitamin D tablet supplementation in infants-effects on dental health after 10 years. Clin. Oral Investig. 2017, 21, 2283–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Donfrancesco, O.; Del Giudice, A.; Zanza, A.; Relucenti, M.; Petracchiola, S.; Gambarini, G.; Testarelli, L.; Seracchiani, M. SEM Evaluation of Endosequence BC Sealer Hiflow in Different Environmental Conditions. J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Relucenti, M.; Miglietta, S.; Bove, G.; Donfrancesco, O.; Battaglione, E.; Familiari, P.; Barbaranelli, C.; Covelli, E.; Barbara, M.; Familiari, G. SEM BSE 3D Image Analysis of Human Incus Bone Affected by Cholesteatoma Ascribes to Osteoclasts the Bone Erosion and VpSEM dEDX Analysis Reveals New Bone Formation. Scanning 2020, 2020, 9371516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fichera, G.; Santonocito, S.; Ronsivalle, V.; Polizzi, A.; Torrisi, S.; Deodato, L.; Palazzo, G.; Isola, G. Prevalence of Early Childhood Caries in Southern Italy: An Epidemiological Study. Int. J. Dent. 2021, 2021, 5106473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kirthiga, M.; Murugan, M.; Saikia, A.; Kirubakaran, R. Risk factors for early childhood caries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case control and cohort studies. Pediatr. Dent. 2019, 41, 95–112. [Google Scholar]
  21. Carta, G.; Cagetti, M.G.; Sale, S.; Congiu, G.; Strohmenger, L.; Oleari, F.; Bossù, M.; Lingström, P.; Campus, G.; Italian Experimental Group on Oral Health. Oral health inequalities in Italian schoolchildren—A cross-sectional evaluation. Community Dent. Health 2014, 31, 123–128. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pakkhesal, M.; Riyahi, E.; Naghavi Alhosseini, A.; Amdjadi, P.; Behnampour, N. Impact of dental caries on oral health related quality of life among preschool children: Perceptions of parents. BMC Oral Health 2021, 21, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lalumandier, J.A.; Rozier, R.G. The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Fluorosis among Patients in a Pediatric Dental Practice. Pediatr. Dent. 1995, 17, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Samples’ cutting procedure to obtain 4 parallelepipeds of 4 mm × 4 mm (AD) from one tooth; the native state was named T0. The dotted rectangle indicates the observed area in each sample (the apex of the cuspid) to avoid methodological biases.
Figure 1. Samples’ cutting procedure to obtain 4 parallelepipeds of 4 mm × 4 mm (AD) from one tooth; the native state was named T0. The dotted rectangle indicates the observed area in each sample (the apex of the cuspid) to avoid methodological biases.
Materials 16 04049 g001
Figure 2. Representative image of study design. Immediate observation was allowed using Variable Pressure Scanning Electron Microscope (VP–SEM), which did not need sputter coating.
Figure 2. Representative image of study design. Immediate observation was allowed using Variable Pressure Scanning Electron Microscope (VP–SEM), which did not need sputter coating.
Materials 16 04049 g002
Figure 3. VPSEM observation. (A) Representative image of the surface of a sample without any treatment belonging to one of the two groups. The surface was marked by scratches and small holes; magnification 5.00 K. (B) Representative image of the surface of a sample after 4 days of immersion or in Fluoride solution or FluorD3 solution, numerous crystals with octahedral shape are visible; magnification 5.00 K.
Figure 3. VPSEM observation. (A) Representative image of the surface of a sample without any treatment belonging to one of the two groups. The surface was marked by scratches and small holes; magnification 5.00 K. (B) Representative image of the surface of a sample after 4 days of immersion or in Fluoride solution or FluorD3 solution, numerous crystals with octahedral shape are visible; magnification 5.00 K.
Materials 16 04049 g003
Figure 4. The graph illustrates the comparison between the number of crystals formed after immersion in control and test groups. No statistically significant differences were evidenced by the t-Test (p = 0.4663).
Figure 4. The graph illustrates the comparison between the number of crystals formed after immersion in control and test groups. No statistically significant differences were evidenced by the t-Test (p = 0.4663).
Materials 16 04049 g004
Figure 5. (A) Surface of a sample immersed in fluoride solution, 500×. Numerous crystals with octahedral shapes and different orientations are visible. (B) Surface of a sample immersed in fluoride and Vitamin D3 solution, 500×. The formed crystals have an octahedral shape.
Figure 5. (A) Surface of a sample immersed in fluoride solution, 500×. Numerous crystals with octahedral shapes and different orientations are visible. (B) Surface of a sample immersed in fluoride and Vitamin D3 solution, 500×. The formed crystals have an octahedral shape.
Materials 16 04049 g005
Figure 6. The graph illustrates the comparison between the size of crystals formed after immersion for 4 days in control and test solutions. No statistically significant differences were evidenced by the t-Test (p = 0.2011).
Figure 6. The graph illustrates the comparison between the size of crystals formed after immersion for 4 days in control and test solutions. No statistically significant differences were evidenced by the t-Test (p = 0.2011).
Materials 16 04049 g006
Figure 7. VPSEM observation. (A) Detail of Picture B showing crystals emerging with one vertex (arrow) from the enamel surface microcavities. (B) One crystal originates with two vertexes and one side (arrow) from the enamel surface irregularities.
Figure 7. VPSEM observation. (A) Detail of Picture B showing crystals emerging with one vertex (arrow) from the enamel surface microcavities. (B) One crystal originates with two vertexes and one side (arrow) from the enamel surface irregularities.
Materials 16 04049 g007
Figure 8. The graph illustrates the distribution of crystals’ number present in the same 105 microscopic fields in the same samples at T1 and T2. No statistically significant differences were evidenced by the t-Test between crystals’ number at T1 and T2 (p = 0.2231).
Figure 8. The graph illustrates the distribution of crystals’ number present in the same 105 microscopic fields in the same samples at T1 and T2. No statistically significant differences were evidenced by the t-Test between crystals’ number at T1 and T2 (p = 0.2231).
Materials 16 04049 g008
Figure 9. VPSEM observation and 3D reconstruction. (A) A microscopic field imaged at 2.00 K at T1. (B) The same field at T2. (C) 3D reconstruction of a dotted rectangle in T1. (D) 3D reconstruction of a dotted rectangle in T2. In Sample T2, the surfaces appeared rougher than in T1.
Figure 9. VPSEM observation and 3D reconstruction. (A) A microscopic field imaged at 2.00 K at T1. (B) The same field at T2. (C) 3D reconstruction of a dotted rectangle in T1. (D) 3D reconstruction of a dotted rectangle in T2. In Sample T2, the surfaces appeared rougher than in T1.
Materials 16 04049 g009
Figure 10. The graph illustrates the distribution of size values of the same 15 crystals at T1 and T2. Statistically significant differences were evidenced by the t-Test between crystal sizes at T1 and T2 (p < 0.0001).
Figure 10. The graph illustrates the distribution of size values of the same 15 crystals at T1 and T2. Statistically significant differences were evidenced by the t-Test between crystal sizes at T1 and T2 (p < 0.0001).
Materials 16 04049 g010
Figure 11. Surface analysis and 3D reconstruction. (A) Size measurement of crystals in the microscopic field imaged at 2.00 K at T1. (B) Size measurement of crystals in the same field at T2. (C) 3D surface reconstruction of T1 crystal in false colors (yellow: high level; green: middle level; blue: deep level). (D) 3D surface reconstruction of T2 crystal in false colors (yellow: high level; green: middle level; blue: deep level). The surface in T2 appeared porous and eroded, as shown by the presence of larger blue areas than T1.
Figure 11. Surface analysis and 3D reconstruction. (A) Size measurement of crystals in the microscopic field imaged at 2.00 K at T1. (B) Size measurement of crystals in the same field at T2. (C) 3D surface reconstruction of T1 crystal in false colors (yellow: high level; green: middle level; blue: deep level). (D) 3D surface reconstruction of T2 crystal in false colors (yellow: high level; green: middle level; blue: deep level). The surface in T2 appeared porous and eroded, as shown by the presence of larger blue areas than T1.
Materials 16 04049 g011
Figure 12. VPSEM observation. (A) A microscopic field imagined at 5.00 K at T2. (B) The same field at T3. (C) 3D reconstruction of the dotted rectangle at T2. (D) 3D reconstruction of the dotted rectangle at T3. The reconstruction emphasized that crystals were still in place even if deeply eroded.
Figure 12. VPSEM observation. (A) A microscopic field imagined at 5.00 K at T2. (B) The same field at T3. (C) 3D reconstruction of the dotted rectangle at T2. (D) 3D reconstruction of the dotted rectangle at T3. The reconstruction emphasized that crystals were still in place even if deeply eroded.
Materials 16 04049 g012
Figure 13. The graph illustrates the distribution of size values of the same 15 crystals at T2 and T3. Statistically significant differences were evidenced by the t-Test between crystals’ sizes at T2 and T3 (p < 0.0001).
Figure 13. The graph illustrates the distribution of size values of the same 15 crystals at T2 and T3. Statistically significant differences were evidenced by the t-Test between crystals’ sizes at T2 and T3 (p < 0.0001).
Materials 16 04049 g013
Figure 14. Surface analysis and 3D reconstruction. (A) Surface measurement of a crystal in the microscopic field imaged at 5.00 K at T2. (B) Surface measurement of crystal at the same field at T3. (C) 3D surface reconstruction of a crystal at T2 in false colors (white: highest level; red: middle level; green: ground level). (D) 3D surface reconstruction of the same crystal at T3 in false colors (white: highest level; red: middle level; green: ground level). The reduction of crystal surface in T3 was evident. showing the absence of white areas and an almost complete erosion of the perimeter.
Figure 14. Surface analysis and 3D reconstruction. (A) Surface measurement of a crystal in the microscopic field imaged at 5.00 K at T2. (B) Surface measurement of crystal at the same field at T3. (C) 3D surface reconstruction of a crystal at T2 in false colors (white: highest level; red: middle level; green: ground level). (D) 3D surface reconstruction of the same crystal at T3 in false colors (white: highest level; red: middle level; green: ground level). The reduction of crystal surface in T3 was evident. showing the absence of white areas and an almost complete erosion of the perimeter.
Materials 16 04049 g014
Table 1. Summary statistics of crystals’ number formed after immersion for 4 days in fluoride solution and after immersion for 4 days in FluorD3.
Table 1. Summary statistics of crystals’ number formed after immersion for 4 days in fluoride solution and after immersion for 4 days in FluorD3.
Fluoride SolutionFluorD3
Sample size105105
Arithmetic mean85.8587.50
95% CI mean82.74–88.9684.28–90.72
Variance257.95277.21
Standard deviation16.0616.64
Standard error of the mean1.561.62
Table 2. Summary statistics of formed crystals’ size after immersion in control and test solutions.
Table 2. Summary statistics of formed crystals’ size after immersion in control and test solutions.
FluorideFluorD3
Sample size150150
Arithmetic mean1.491.54
95% CI mean1.44–1.541.49–1.59
Variance0.10.11
Standard deviation0.310.32
Standard error of the mean0.020.03
Table 3. Summary statistics of crystals’ number within the same 105 microscopic fields at T1 and T2.
Table 3. Summary statistics of crystals’ number within the same 105 microscopic fields at T1 and T2.
T1T2
Sample size105105
Arithmetic mean87.5084.71
95% CI mean84.28–90.7281.53–87.89
Variance277.21270
Standard deviation16.6416.44
Standard error of the mean1.621.60
Table 4. Summary statistics of each individual crystal size measured at T1 and T2.
Table 4. Summary statistics of each individual crystal size measured at T1 and T2.
T1T2
Sample size1515
Arithmetic mean1.491.09
95% CI mean1.22–1.770.88–1.30
Variance0.240.14
Standard deviation0.4960.38
Standard error of the mean0.120.09
Table 5. Summary statistics of each crystal size measured at T2 and T3.
Table 5. Summary statistics of each crystal size measured at T2 and T3.
T2T3
Sample size1515
Arithmetic mean6.554.03
95% CI mean5.76–7.343.57–4.49
Variance2.030.69
Standard deviation1.420.83
Standard error of the mean0.360.21
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Giorgio, G.; Relucenti, M.; Iaculli, F.; Salucci, A.; Donfrancesco, O.; Polimeni, A.; Bossù, M. The Application of a Fluoride-and-Vitamin D Solution to Deciduous Teeth Promotes Formation of Persistent Mineral Crystals: A Morphological Ex-Vivo Study. Materials 2023, 16, 4049. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114049

AMA Style

Di Giorgio G, Relucenti M, Iaculli F, Salucci A, Donfrancesco O, Polimeni A, Bossù M. The Application of a Fluoride-and-Vitamin D Solution to Deciduous Teeth Promotes Formation of Persistent Mineral Crystals: A Morphological Ex-Vivo Study. Materials. 2023; 16(11):4049. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Giorgio, Gianni, Michela Relucenti, Flavia Iaculli, Alessandro Salucci, Orlando Donfrancesco, Antonella Polimeni, and Maurizio Bossù. 2023. "The Application of a Fluoride-and-Vitamin D Solution to Deciduous Teeth Promotes Formation of Persistent Mineral Crystals: A Morphological Ex-Vivo Study" Materials 16, no. 11: 4049. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114049

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop