Next Article in Journal
Study on the Effect of the Pre-Forming of 22MnB5 Steel in Indirect Hot Stamping
Next Article in Special Issue
Current Trends in Spent Portable Lithium Battery Recycling
Previous Article in Journal
Varnish Formation and Removal in Lubrication Systems: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive View of the Optimization of Chromium (VI) Processing through the Application of Electrocoagulation Using a Pair of Steel Electrodes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Zeolite-Encaged Luminescent Silver Nanoclusters

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(10), 3736; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16103736
Submission received: 5 April 2023 / Revised: 10 May 2023 / Accepted: 10 May 2023 / Published: 15 May 2023

Abstract

:
Silver nanoclusters (Ag NCs) are nanoscale aggregates that possess molecular-like discrete energy levels, resulting in electronic configuration-dependent tunable luminescence spanning the entire visible range. Benefiting from the efficient ion exchange capacity, nanometer dimensional cages, and high thermal and chemical stabilities, zeolites have been employed as desirable inorganic matrices to disperse and stabilize Ag NCs. This paper reviewed the recent research progresses on the luminescence properties, spectral manipulation, as well as the theoretical modelling of electronic structure and optical transition of Ag NCs confined inside various zeolites with different topology structures. Furthermore, potential applications of the zeolite-encaged luminescent Ag NCs in lighting, gas monitoring and sensing were presented. This review concludes with a brief comment on the possible future directions in the study of zeolite-encaged luminescent Ag NCs.

1. Introduction

Noble metal nanoclusters are new types of ultra-small luminescent centers that have different electronic structures compared with their bulk counterparts and exhibit size-related luminescence properties as quantum dots. Ag NCs are one of the most researched high luminescent metal nanoclusters, which can be effectively excited by UV light, and the resulting emission is tunable throughout the visible region with a quantum yield approaching that of commercial phosphors. The extraordinary luminescence properties of Ag NCs have attracted considerable research interest in many applications, such as photocatalysis, imaging, illumination, detection and biosensors [1,2,3,4,5]. The emissive character of Ag NCs is closely related to their constitution, geometric structure and chemical state. So far, the explicitly reported luminescent Ag NCs consist of only a few Ag+/Ag0, for example, the Ag2+ dimer [6], the Ag3n+ trimer [7], the Ag42+ tetramer [8], and the Ag62+ hexamer [9].
Due to the high surface energy, Ag NCs are very easily agglomerated into larger silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) with surface plasma resonance (SPR) absorption, resulting in the quenching of radiative emission. In order to obtain bright and tunable emission, suitable scaffolds are required to stabilize the isolated metal nanoclusters by limiting their overgrowth and, meanwhile, offer proper crystal fields and site symmetry [10,11,12]. The incorporations of Ag NCs with organic molecules, such as DNA/RNA, proteins, and polymers, result in satisfied biocompatibility, brightness, and photostability, making them applicable as fluorescent biomarkers; however, the loss of stability over time may limit their applications in devices [13,14,15,16]. Inorganic scaffolds for Ag NCs include glasses [17,18,19,20], metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) [21,22,23], and zeolites [7,8,24]. The rigid structure of glasses can limit the aggregation of Ag NCs due to immobility, but it is harder to limit their growth precisely. The weaker thermal and chemical stability of MOFs compared with inorganics and the introduction of organic templates may hinder the control of Ag NCs growth and meanwhile bring the risk of environmental contamination.
Zeolites are desirable scaffolds for the stabilization of Ag NCs due to their efficient ion exchange capacity that allows the efficient intake of Ag+ and molecular-sized cages for the confinement of domain-limited functional Ag NCs. The basic units of the zeolite framework are silicon-oxygen tetrahedra [SiO4]4− and aluminum-oxygen tetrahedra [AlO4]5−. Due to the presence of [AlO4]5−, the zeolite framework is negatively charged, and therefore some extra framework cations, such as Na+, K+, Li+, Ca2+, are usually introduced for charge balance [25]. The luminescence properties of Ag NCs are not only sensitive to the topology of the zeolite but can also be well manipulated by adjusting the Si/Al ratio and the extra framework cations of the host zeolite, the silver loading degree, as well as the external energy activation condition. Therefore, the diverse topology structures and multiple modification methods of zeolites enable easier and more flexible control of the luminescence properties of Ag NCs. Additionally, the hydration state and adsorption of noxious fume also influence the luminescence performance of Ag NCs that are confined in some types of zeolites or formatted under mild external energy activation, indicating a new sensor and detector application vista besides lighting and display.
This short review started with the preparation and structural characterization of various zeolites-encaged luminescent Ag NCs, followed by the recent studies on the luminescence properties, spectral manipulation, luminescence mechanism and quantum chemistry-based computational study of Ag NCs in zeolites. The applications of zeolite-encaged Ag NCs in white LEDs, tunable luminescence, and moisture and gas monitoring were also presented. This review is finalized by a short comment on the particularly interesting area of future research, including the spectral modification methods, the understanding of the luminescence mechanism, and the possible applications of the high bright zeolite-encaged Ag NCs.

2. Radiative Emission and Spectral Manipulation of Ag NCs in Zeolites

2.1. Building and Characterization of Zeolite-Encaged Ag NCs

Research on the luminescent Ag NCs-loaded zeolites started decades ago when researchers first discovered the radiative emission of Ag NCs in LTA and FAU zeolites under UV excitation [26,27,28]. To obtain a bright emission of Ag NCs with zeolites as scaffolds, a low Si/Al ratio of the host zeolite is essential as it is beneficial for the efficient intake of Ag+ through the replacement of extra framework cations, such as Li+, Na+, and NH4+, during liquid ion-exchange process. Subsequently, the application of external energies, such as thermal treatment [29,30], electron beam [31], and X-rays irradiations [32,33], may promote the reduction of Ag+ into Ag0 by trapping electrons from the O2− that belonged to zeolite framework or adsorbed water, and induce the aggregation of Ag+ and Ag0 for the formation of Ag NCs in zeolites. Recent research indicated that Ag+ exchange efficiency and the external energy driving obviously influence the luminescence behavior of Ag NCs, as it controls the formation efficiency and distribution of Ag NCs inside zeolites [34].
Benefiting from the advanced characterization techniques, the zeolite-encaged Ag NCs can now be observed directly [35,36,37,38]. One example is the study on the correlation between the atomic-scale structure and the luminescence properties of Ag NCs in FAU zeolite, in which complete three-dimensional structural characterizations of Ag NCs were performed by the combination of XRD Rietveld analysis and high-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM), as shown in Figure 1a,b. In this study, two different luminescent clusters were identified after thermal treatment, one is the [Ag4] cluster in Ag-FAUX zeolite, and the other one is the [Ag3] cluster in Ag-FAUY zeolite. It was reported that the [Ag4] clusters associated with yellow emission are constituted by the Ag+/Ag0 that are mainly populated at sites I, I’, II and II’, as shown in Figure 1c. The linear [Ag3] clusters associated with green emission are located along the hexagonal prism connectors and appear to interact weakly with Ag0 located at sites I, I’ and II, as shown in Figure 1d. This work laid the foundation for the luminescence mechanism investigations in terms of structure [36].
The electron spin resonance (ESR) characterization provided structural information of the confined Ag NCs [7,39,40,41]. According to the ESR analysis, the 690 nm emission in LTA zeolites is associated with Ag6+ with a doublet electronic ground state, while the 550 nm emitter is related to Ag3+ [40]. Additionally, the more powerful extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) and the X-ray excited optical luminescence-EXAFS (XEOL-EXAFS) was also employed to obtain the direct structural information of Ag NCs formatted inside LTA, FAUY, and FAUX zeolites, such as Ag-Ag, Ag-O, and Ag-Li distances [9,42,43,44]. In recent years, a series of Ag NCs models have been built by taking the sodalite cavity of LTA zeolite as framework [8,45,46], aimed to calculate the energy level structure and possible optical transitions between the discrete energy levels of Ag NCs with different structural configurations and valence states. The combination of experimental characterization and theoretical calculation is helpful for the systematical investigation on the luminescence mechanism of Ag NCs confined inside zeolites with different topologies from the perspectives of constitution, configuration, energy level structure, and luminescence kinetics, providing a strong support for achieving bright, efficient, and tunable emission of zeolite-encaged Ag NCs.

2.2. Luminescence Properties of Ag NCs Confined Inside Zeolites

Low Si/Al ratio zeolites, such as FAU, LTA and SOD, have been widely employed as ideal scaffolds for Ag NCs. These zeolites all consist of sodalite cages, the differences in structure are that the sodalite cages are connected by a double six-membered ring (D6r) in FAU, a double four-membered ring (D4r) in LTA, while SOD consists entirely of the sodalite cages with a homogeneous structure [47]. Recent studies indicated that the luminescence quantum yields of Ag NCs are strongly dependent on the topology structure of the host zeolites, which can reach around 97% in FAU zeolite while below 83% in LTA zeolite [48,49].
FAU zeolites can be subdivided into FAUX (1 < Si/Al < 1.5) and FAUY (1.5 < Si/Al < 3) types according to the Si/Al ratio. Generally, the Ag NCs confined inside FAUY zeolite exhibit a blue-shifted emission compared with those confined inside FAUX zeolite due to the reduced lattice parameter. It was reported that the strong green visible emission centered at 540–550 nm and around 530 nm can be obtained after thermal treatment of the Ag+-exchanged FAUX and FAUY zeolites, respectively [24,43,50,51]. According to emission spectra, XPS studies and extended Hückel molecular orbital calculation, the optimum geometry of Ag3n+ is nearly linearly coordinated inside the D6r cage of FAU zeolites [7,50].
The correlation between the radiative emission and the structural configuration of Ag NCs confined inside LTA zeolites has been investigated with the help of ESR and EXAFS measurements. It was reported that the Ag NCs formed in LTA zeolites tend to be located in the sodalite cages, in which the Ag53+ cluster formed in Ag12-LTA zeolite exhibits a yellow emission around 577 nm [52], the Ag6+ cluster gives off a red emission [35,41], the Ag3n+ and Ag4n+ clusters show a yellow-green emission around 550 nm [7,28,40,41], respectively. The effect of the silver loading degree on the luminescence properties of Ag NCs was also extensively explored in Li-LTA zeolites, and it was indicated that the emission wavelength of Ag NCs under UV excitation is strongly dependent on silver loading degree: Ag1–2Li-LTA zeolite emits green light, Ag3–4Li-LTA zeolite emits yellow light, and Ag5–12Li-LTA zeolite emits red light, respectively [34].
The tunable emission of Ag NCs was also reported in SOD zeolites. For example, by substituting the extra framework cations of Na+ with Cs+ and adjusting silver loading degree, the emission color of Ag NCs can be turned from green through yellow to red. The reported tunable emission of Ag NCs is mainly due to the lattice shrinkage or expansion of the host zeolites, which conversely applies the structural feedback to the luminescence property of Ag NCs [25,53,54].

2.3. Luminescence Tailoring through Structure Modification of Host Zeolites

Many recent studies revealed that the extra framework cations influence not only the Ag+ exchange capacity but also the formation efficiency and the local crystal fields of Ag NCs. Generally, small radius extra framework cations lead to reduced lattice parameters and, therefore, blue-shifted emission, and the Ag NCs showed the strongest emission intensity in Li-zeolites among a series of M-zeolites (M = Na+, K+, Cs+, Ca2+) [29,53,55,56]. Taking FAU zeolite as an example, as shown in Figure 2a, site I is located inside the D6r cage, sites II and III inside the sodalite cage, and sites IV and V inside the super cage, respectively. All the sites from I to V can be occupied by extra framework cations with different ionic radii, such as Li+, Na+, K+, NH4+, H+, and Ca2+ [55,57]. The researchers studied the influence of extra framework cations on the luminescence properties of Ag NCs in the Na-FAUY zeolite and Li+, Ca2+ partially exchanged zeolites. It was suggested that Ag NCs show stronger emission in Li-FAUY zeolites, and meanwhile, the emission peak is tunable between 462 and 530 nm, which drastically blue-shifted in Li-FAUY zeolites while slightly red-shifted in Ca-FAUY zeolites compared with in Na-FAUY zeolites, as shown in Figure 2b [29]. It was also reported that the peak emission wavelength of Ag NCs can also be well turned from 470 to 610 nm when confined in the Li+, Na+, K+, Cs+, and Mg2+ partially exchanged SOD zeolites [25,53,54].
Furthermore, the effect of extra framework cations on the luminescence performance of Ag NCs was systematically studied with LTA as host zeolite by increasing the substitution ratio of Na+ by Li+. According to XEOL-EXAFS and Transmission-EXAFS (Tr-EXAFS) measurements, the Agc-Agc equilibrium distance in the ground state is about 2.68 Å, while the Agc-Agc equilibrium distance in the excited state is Li+ content dependent, which decreases from 2.75 Å in Ag1-exchanged Li0Na12-LTA to 2.70 Å in Ag1-exchanged Li12Na0-LTA. The decreased difference in Agc-Agc distances between the excited state and ground state of Ag NCs from 0.07 to 0.02 Å revealed a stronger guest–host–guest interaction in the LTA zeolites with increasing Li+ as extra framework cations. It was indicated that the emission peak of Ag NCs shows a drastic blue shift from 605 to 510 nm with increasing Li+ exchange amount in LixNa12−x-LTA zeolites because of the reduced lattice parameters of the host zeolites, as shown in Figure 3 [44].
In addition to the extra framework cations substitution, the luminescence properties of Ag NCs can also be manipulated through framework modification by using desilication and dealumination approaches. During the desilication and dealumination processes, the Si/Al ratio of the zeolite framework can be modified, thus introducing a new method for regulating and optimizing the luminescence performance of Ag NCs in zeolites [58,59,60]. It was presented that the Ag NCs showed red-shifted emission in the desilicated FAUY zeolites and blue-shifted emission in the dealuminated FAUY zeolites, and a tunable emission in the wavelength range of 482–528 nm was obtained, as shown in Figure 4. This tunable luminescence property of Ag NCs is the result of controlling the local crystal field and the coupling between the host lattice and the luminescent center. Compared with adjusting the silver loading degree, the framework modification can tailor the emission of Ag NCs in a wider wavelength region and improve luminescence intensity [58].

2.4. Water Manipulated Ag NCs Emission

The three-dimensional eight-ring diffusion channels present in LTA zeolites allow for rapid adsorption/desorption of H2O; therefore, the luminescence of Ag NCs confined inside LTA zeolites is closely associated with hydration and dehydration states of the host zeolites [61,62]. Related studies suggested that the reversible luminescence response in the hydration and dehydration cycle is related to the structural dynamics of Ag NCs confined in the sodalite cages of LTA zeolites [9,34,63,64].
In the hydrated states, the Ag4 cluster [Ag4(H2O)x, 0 ≤ x ≤ 8] is responsible for the green-yellowish emission in the range of 520–570 nm under UV excitation. According to the ESR and EXAFS investigations, the luminescent [Ag4(H2O)4]2+ clusters are distributed along the six-ring axis of the sodalite cage [34,63,64]. Upon dehydration, [Ag4(H2O)x] clusters are transformed into the non-luminescent [Ag6(OF)14]2+ clusters that appear to interact strongly with zeolite framework oxygen (OF) [9]. This reversible Ag42+↔Ag62+ switching highlights the importance of the Ag NCs charge and valence electrons in the modulation of their optical properties.
The effect of hydration degree on the luminescence properties of Ag NCs has also been extensively investigated at low silver loading degrees. As shown in Figure 5, the emission of Ag1Li–LTA zeolites shows red-shifted emission from blue to green-yellow with increasing hydration levels [34]. This hydration/dehydration-induced emission wavelength change of Ag NCs can also be observed when confined inside K-, Na- and Ca-LTA zeolites; however, the response is not as fast as in Li-LTA zeolite, which may be due to the lower mobility of those extra framework cations than Li+ [9]. It was also noted that the external quantum efficiency (EQE) of Ag NCs in K-, Na- and Ca-LTA zeolites is below 16%, while Ag1Li-LTA zeolite has a high EQE of up to 62%, due to the pronounced dynamic change in the emissive color of the Ag1Li-LTA zeolite with the degree of hydration and the high EQE, which can be potentially applied as a humidity sensor.

2.5. Emission of Ag NCs in Rare Earth Ions Exchanged Zeolites

In recent years, the rare earth (RE) ions and Ag NCs co-loaded zeolites have been developed for the generation of a bright visible emission, in which the Ag NCs act as the sensitizer for RE ions and the RE ions regulate the formation efficiency and luminescence properties of Ag NCs [50,65]. In the Ag+-RE ions dual exchanged zeolites, Eu3+ may promote the formation of Ag NCs in Na-FAUX zeolites during the thermal treatment process, which benefits the reduction of Ag+ [65], while the existence of Tb3+ can hinder the supply of electrons required for the reduction of Ag+ to Ag0 and thus hinder the effective formation of Ag NCs [50]. Moreover, the XPS measurement indicated that the prior Tb3+ exchange might lead to a reduced Si/Al ratio and thus result in blue-shifted emission and stronger ionic properties of Ag NCs. Due to the tunable broadband emission that can fully overlap the excitation band of RE ions, Ag NCs are expected as effective sensitizers for RE ions in zeolites. It was reported that the energy transfer efficiency from Ag NCs to Eu3+ in FAUX reaches around 73% with optimized Ag+ exchange amount and thermal treatment condition, as shown in Figure 6 [51]. Benefiting from the efficient energy transfer from [Ag2]n+ pairs to Eu3+ and the combination of the red emission of Eu3+ and the green emission of Ag NCs, the warm white light emission was obtained in SOD zeolite [66].

3. Studies on the Luminescence Mechanism of Ag NCs in Zeolites

The mechanism behind the tunable luminescence of Ag NCs in zeolites attracts great research interest and has been investigated from the aspects of experimental characterization and theoretical calculation. As early as 1962, researchers discovered that Ag NCs loaded Na-LTA zeolites are colorless in a hydrated state, while activating to yellow when highly vacuumed at room temperature and turning brownish red when heated [26]. This hydration state dependence of reversible color change was attributed to electronic charge transfer from the oxygen lone pairs of the zeolite framework to the empty 5 s orbital of Ag+ ions, and known as the ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) process [67]. Recent studies suggested that the electron transition from the neighboring Ag+-Ag+ metal-to-metal charge transfer (MMCT) state to the ground state may be responsible for the green- and red-dominated emissions in Ag NCs loaded LTA zeolites, as shown in Figure 7a. A similar luminescence mechanism was also proposed for the Ag NCs that are confined inside SOD zeolites, as shown in Figure 7b [54]. The mechanism of Ag NCs in Li+ partially exchanged Na-LTA zeolites was also investigated with the help of temperature-dependent luminescence. It was suggested that the emissions located around 595 (298–233 K), 495 (233–153 K), and 395 nm (153–83 K) are due to the radiative transitions from the triplet states to the singlet states that resulted from the confinement effect of Ag NCs, and the difference between the lowest multiple minima in the excited state potential energy surface lead to different emissions, as shown in Figure 7c [68].
In order to acquire more information on the relationship between the structural configuration and the luminescence performance of Ag NCs, the DFT and TD-DFT calculations were carried out to compute the energy level structure, the HOMO and LUMO states, and the absorption spectra. In these computational studies, the unit sodalite cavity of [Si24H24O36] in LTA zeolite was used to encage Ag NCs [8,45,46,69]. One of the successful examples is the investigation of the origin of the bright-green emission of Ag NCs confined inside LTA zeolites. According to XEOL, EXAFS, TD-DFT calculation and time-resolved spectroscopy, a mixture of tetrahedral [Ag4(H2O)x]2+ (x = 2 and 4) clusters occupies the center of a fraction of the sodalite cages, as shown in Figure 8a, and the radiative emission is originated from a confined two-electron superatom quantum system with hybridized Ag and water O orbitals delocalized over the cluster. Based on the calculated energy level in Figure 8b, the modeled absorption spectra peaked at 343 and 320 nm for [Ag4(H2O)2]2+, and [Ag4(H2O)4]2+ isomers are in excellent agreement with the experimentally measured absorption and excitation spectra, as shown in Figure 8c,d. It was estimated that the Ag3K9-LTA zeolite consists of about 40% of Ag4(H2O)4 and 60% of Ag4(H2O)2 clusters [8].
In recent research, the all Si zeolite model was further improved by taking framework Al into consideration; the researchers designed a sodalite cavity with different Si/Al ratios of 11, 5 and 1, respectively [69]. TD-DFT calculations show that the maximum positions of calculated absorption spectra are between 3 and 4 eV, which is consistent with the experimentally observed absorption peak positions. When the framework Si is replaced by Al, the triplet state energy is increased, and this asymmetric local structure is more favorable to the intersystem crossing of different excited spin states.

4. Applications of Zeolite-Encaged Ag NCs

The Ag NCs show bright and tunable emission when confined inside different zeolites, and their luminescence stability is host zeolite and preparation condition dependent. For the zeolite-encaged Ag NCs with stable and tunable emission, their potential application as LED phosphors has been demonstrated, while for those exhibiting sensitive luminescence properties to environmental variations, they can be developed as sensors for toxic and hazardous gases.

4.1. Phosphors for LEDs

White LEDs are replacing conventional lighting devices due to the advantages of being efficient, mercury-free and environmentally friendly. Recent research indicated that the LEDs fabricated with light-emitting metal-cluster-loaded zeolites provide not only light quality but also high stability and long life [70,71].
It was reported that the high thermal treatment temperature of 950 °C led to the structure collapses of Ag-loaded FAUY zeolite, and the formatted [Ag2]+ and [Ag+]2 clusters in the glassy host give off intense white light emission under UV excitation. Combining this white emitting phosphor with a UV-COB, the white LED with a CCT of 5986 K and a high Ra of 92.3 was successfully fabricated, as shown in Figure 9a,b [6]. The Ag NCs confined in Li-LTA zeolite exhibit bright green emission under 340 nm excitation, based on which the prototype green-emissive LED was fabricated using a 340 nm chip, as shown in Figure 9c, which shows uniform green emission from the phosphor layer with an EQE of 83% [48]. Alternatively, the introduction of luminescent Ag NCs-loaded LTA zeolites as emitters in a conductive polymer matrix has led to the emergence of a new type of LEDs named ZEOLEDs. By adjusting the initial silver-loading degree in zeolites, it is possible to achieve tunable emission from blue to red and even near-white [72].

4.2. Detection and Sensor

The optical response of zeolite-encaged Ag NCs to external stimuli can also be applied to monitoring and sensing. For example, the reversible luminescence of Ag NCs in LTA zeolites is closely related to the hydration–dehydration process, providing new ideas for humidity sensors [9,34,63,73]. Recent research indicated that the emission wavelength of Ag NCs formatted in low silver-loaded Li-LTA zeolite is significantly related to the hydration state. The fully hydrated Ag1Li-LTA composites (19% water content) show yellow emission, the partially hydrated samples (2% water content) show green and blue emission, and samples with less than 1% water content show blue emission, respectively, as demonstrated in Figure 10 [34]. It was suggested that this luminescent LTA(Li)-Ag composite with dramatic hydration-state-dependent color change could be used as a moisture sensor.
Formaldehyde is the main indoor pollutant emitted by buildings and decorative materials and is harmful to human health [74,75]. Recent studies indicated that the luminescence properties of FAUY zeolite-encaged Ag NCs show a rapid and sensitive response to formaldehyde gas [76,77]. Figure 11a shows the PL spectra of Ag NCs-loaded FAUY zeolites in normal and increasing concentrations of formaldehyde atmospheres from 80 to 2560 ppb. A good linear relationship between the emission intensity of Ag NCs and formaldehyde concentration in the logarithmic range was obtained, as shown in Figure 11b [76].
Further research indicated that the Ag NCs show different spectra response sensitivity in Na- and Li-FAU zeolites. Figure 11c shows relationships between formaldehyde concentration (x) and the emission intensity variation (y = Ix/Ioriginal) of Ag CLs in Li-FAUY and Na-FAUY zeolites, which can be linearly fitted with Equations (1) and (2), respectively.
y = A 1 × e x t 0 + A 2 ·   ( A 1 = 0.30 ,   A 2 = 0.69 ,   t 0 = 0.25 ,   R 2 = 0.991 )
y = B 2 B 1 1 + x x 0 p + B 2 ·   ( B 1 = 1.00 ,   B 2 = 0.51 ,   x 0 = 0.25 ,   p = 2.43 ,   R 2 = 0.998 )
As can be observed from Figure 11c, AgLi-FAUY zeolite can more sensitively detect low-content formaldehyde than AgNa-FAUY zeolite, which is due to the high number of Ag+/Ag0 redox pairs in AgLi-FAUY zeolite that can promote the adsorption of formaldehyde. At higher formaldehyde concentrations, the significantly decreased emission intensity of Ag NCs in Na-FAUY zeolite is due to its relatively large specific surface area, which enables the adsorption of more formaldehyde gas. The detection limits of formaldehyde by Na- and Li-FAUY zeolite-encaged Ag NCs meet the requirements of WHO, OSHA and China’s standards for indoor air quality.

5. Conclusions

Zeolites are promising scaffolds for the assembly of highly luminescent Ag NCs, as they allow for the flexible regulation of the luminescence properties of confined Ag NCs due to their abundant topology structures and exchangeable extra-framework cations. So far, the tunable emission of Ag NCs nearly across the visible region has been achieved by controlling the local crystal field and guest–host–guest interaction through host zeolite structure modification. Nevertheless, there is still a necessity to explore further methods to more precisely control the emission wavelength and improve the emission intensity of Ag NCs, for example, introducing non-luminescent RE ions as extra-framework cations or making use of intergrowth zeolites as scaffolds. On the other hand, how the geometric and electronic structure of Ag NCs influences their luminescence properties should be systematically studied with the assistance of quantum-chemistry-based computation, in which the framework Al and extra-framework cations should be taken into consideration in the building of sodalite or D6r cavities. Understanding the exact luminescent and spectral control mechanisms, as well as how the various parameters governing the luminescence tunability with the help of more advanced characterization techniques and theoretical calculations, is of great importance for the design of zeolite-encaged luminescent Ag NCs for efficient lighting phosphors and smart sensor devices applications, as well as other applications in adsorption and catalysis.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51872200, 51772210), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No. 18ZR1441900) and the National Key Research and Development Projects (No. 2018YFC1106302).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, L.; Lopez-Haro, M.; Lopes, C.W.; Li, C.; Concepcion, P.; Simonelli, L.; Calvino, J.J.; Corma, A. Regioselective generation and reactivity control of subnanometric platinum clusters in zeolites for high-temperature catalysis. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 866–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ferreira, L.; Fonseca, A.M.; Botelho, G.; Almeida-Aguiar, C.; Neves, I.C. Antimicrobial activity of faujasite zeolites doped with silver. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 160, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Goswami, N.; Yao, Q.; Luo, Z.; Li, J.; Chen, T.; Xie, J. Luminescent Metal Nanoclusters with Aggregation-Induced Emission. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 962–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vosch, T.; Antoku, Y.; Hsiang, J.-C.; Richards, C.I.; Gonzalez, J.I.; Dickson, R.M. Strongly emissive individual DNA-encapsulated Ag nanoclusters as single-molecule fluorophores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 12616–12621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Devaraj, V.; Lee, I.H.; Kim, M.; Nguyen, T.M.; Son, J.P.; Lee, J.-M.; Lee, D.; Kim, K.H.; Oh, J.-W. Unveiling facet effects in metallic nanoparticles to design an efficient plasmonic nanostructure. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2022, 44, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yao, D.; Xu, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, H. White-emitting phosphors with high color-rendering index based on silver cluster-loaded zeolites and their application to near-UV LED-based white LEDs. Mater. Chem. Front. 2019, 3, 1080–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. De Cremer, G.; Coutino-Gonzalez, E.; Roeffaers, M.B.; De Vos, D.E.; Hofkens, J.; Vosch, T.; Sels, B.F. In situ observation of the emission characteristics of zeolite-hosted silver species during heat treatment. Chemphyschem 2010, 11, 1627–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Grandjean, D.; Coutino-Gonzalez, E.; Cuong, N.T.; Fron, E.; Baekelant, W.; Aghakhani, S.; Schlexer, P.; D’Acapito, F.; Banerjee, D.; Roeffaers, M.B.J.; et al. Origin of the bright photoluminescence of few-atom silver clusters confined in LTA zeolites. Science 2018, 361, 686–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aghakhani, S.; Grandjean, D.; Baekelant, W.; Coutino-Gonzalez, E.; Fron, E.; Kvashnina, K.; Roeffaers, M.B.J.; Hofkens, J.; Sels, B.F.; Lievens, P. Atomic scale reversible opto-structural switching of few atom luminescent silver clusters confined in LTA zeolites. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 11467–11476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Quintanilla, M.; Liz-Marzan, L.M. Caged clusters shine brighter. Science 2018, 361, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Diez, I.; Ras, R.H. Fluorescent silver nanoclusters. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 1963–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Romolini, G.; Steele, J.A.; Hofkens, J.; Roeffaers, M.B.J.; Coutino-Gonzalez, E. Tunable Luminescence from Stable Silver Nanoclusters Confined in Microporous Zeolites. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2100526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gwinn, E.; Schultz, D.; Copp, S.M.; Swasey, S. DNA-Protected Silver Clusters for Nanophotonics. Nanomaterials 2015, 5, 180–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kondo, J.; Tada, Y.; Dairaku, T.; Hattori, Y.; Saneyoshi, H.; Ono, A.; Tanaka, Y. A metallo-DNA nanowire with uninterrupted one-dimensional silver array. Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 956–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yang, X.; Sun, J.-K.; Kitta, M.; Pang, H.; Xu, Q. Encapsulating highly catalytically active metal nanoclusters inside porous organic cages. Nat. Catal. 2018, 1, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yonesato, K.; Ito, H.; Itakura, H.; Yokogawa, D.; Kikuchi, T.; Mizuno, N.; Yamaguchi, K.; Suzuki, K. Controlled Assembly Synthesis of Atomically Precise Ultrastable Silver Nanoclusters with Polyoxometalates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 19550–19554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tikhomirov, V.K.; Rodríguez, V.D.; Kuznetsov, A.; Kirilenko, D.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Moshchalkov, V.V. Preparation and luminescence of bulk oxyfluoride glasses doped with Ag nanoclusters. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 22032–22040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cuong, N.T.; Tikhomirov, V.K.; Chibotaru, L.F.; Stesmans, A.; Rodriguez, V.D.; Nguyen, M.T.; Moshchalkov, V.V. Experiment and theoretical modeling of the luminescence of silver nanoclusters dispersed in oxyfluoride glass. J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 136, 174108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kuznetsov, A.S.; Cuong, N.T.; Tikhomirov, V.K.; Jivanescu, M.; Stesmans, A.; Chibotaru, L.F.; Velázquez, J.J.; Rodríguez, V.D.; Kirilenko, D.; Van Tendeloo, G.; et al. Effect of heat-treatment on luminescence and structure of Ag nanoclusters doped oxyfluoride glasses and implication for fiber drawing. Opt. Mater. 2012, 34, 616–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shestakov, M.V.; Cuong, N.T.; Tikhomirov, V.K.; Nguyen, M.T.; Chibotaru, L.F.; Moshchalkov, V.V. Quantum Chemistry Modeling of Luminescence Kinetics of Ag Nanoclusters Dispersed in Glass Host. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 7796–7800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Houk, R.J.T.; Jacobs, B.W.; El Gabaly, F.; Chang, N.N.; Talin, A.A.; Graham, D.D.; House, S.D.; Robertson, I.M.; Allendorf, M.D. Silver Cluster Formation, Dynamics, and Chemistry in Metal-Organic Frameworks. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3413–3418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sun, N.; Yan, B. Ag(+)-induced photoluminescence enhancement in lanthanide post-functionalized MOFs and Ag(+) sensing. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 9174–9180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ge, K.-M.; Wang, D.; Xu, Z.-J.; Chu, R.-Q. A luminescent Eu(III)-MOF for selective sensing of Ag+ in aqueous solution. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1208, 127862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Taiji, K.; Iso, Y.; Isobe, T. Fluorescent Ag+-exchanged zeolite nanoparticles with improved photoluminescence properties via X-ray irradiation. J. Lumin. 2018, 196, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tian, X.; Li, Q.; Yao, D.; Li, P.; Li, H.; Wang, Y. Tunable luminescence of silver-exchanged SOD zeolite thermally treated under mild conditions. J. Mater. Chem. C 2022, 10, 1666–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rálek, M.; Jírů, P.; Grubner, O.; Beyer, H. Molekularsiebe mit farbiger Indizierung des Wassergehaltes. Collect. Czechoslov. Chem. Commun. 1962, 27, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tsutsumi, K.; Takahashi, H. The Formation of Metallic Silver in Silver-Form Zeolites. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1972, 45, 2332–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gellens, L.R.; Mortier, W.J.; Uytterhoeven, J.B. On the nature of the charged silver clusters in zeolites of type A, X and Y. Zeolites 1981, 1, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yu, J.; Ye, S.; Liao, H.; Xv, X.; Wang, D. Luminescence Control of Silver Nanoclusters by Tailoring Extra-Framework Cations in FAU-Y Zeolite: Implications for Tunable Emission. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 13692–13699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yu, J.; Ye, S.; Shi, Y.; Liao, H.; Wang, D. Thermally formation and luminescent performance of silver nanoclusters confined within LTA zeolites. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 857, 157614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mayoral, A.; Anderson, P.A. Production of bimetallic nanowires through electron beam irradiation of copper- and silver-containing zeolite A. Nanotechnology 2007, 18, 165708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Coutino-Gonzalez, E.; Grandjean, D.; Roeffaers, M.; Kvashnina, K.; Fron, E.; Dieu, B.; De Cremer, G.; Lievens, P.; Sels, B.; Hofkens, J. X-ray irradiation-induced formation of luminescent silver clusters in nanoporous matrices. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 1350–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fenwick, O.; Coutino-Gonzalez, E.; Richard, F.; Bonacchi, S.; Baekelant, W.; de Vos, D.; Roeffaers, M.B.J.; Hofkens, J.; Samori, P. X-ray-Induced Growth Dynamics of Luminescent Silver Clusters in Zeolites. Small 2020, 16, e2002063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Coutino-Gonzalez, E.; Baekelant, W.; Grandjean, D.; Roeffaers, M.B.J.; Fron, E.; Aghakhani, M.S.; Bovet, N.; Van der Auweraer, M.; Lievens, P.; Vosch, T.; et al. Thermally activated LTA(Li)–Ag zeolites with water-responsive photoluminescence properties. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 11857–11867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mayoral, A.; Carey, T.; Anderson, P.A.; Lubk, A.; Diaz, I. Atomic resolution analysis of silver ion-exchanged zeolite A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2011, 50, 11230–11233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Altantzis, T.; Coutino-Gonzalez, E.; Baekelant, W.; Martinez, G.T.; Abakumov, A.M.; Tendeloo, G.V.; Roeffaers, M.B.; Bals, S.; Hofkens, J. Direct Observation of Luminescent Silver Clusters Confined in Faujasite Zeolites. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 7604–7611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mayoral, A.; Carey, T.; Anderson, P.A.; Diaz, I. Atomic resolution analysis of porous solids: A detailed study of silver ion-exchanged zeolite A. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 166, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hiyoshi, N.; Ikeda, T.; Hasegawa, Y.; Sato, K. Observation of La-exchanged NaY zeolite using aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2021, 311, 110711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Michalik, J.; Sadlo, J.; Kodaira, T.; Shimomura, S.; Yamada, H. ESR and optical studies of cationic silver clusters in zeolite rho. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 1998, 232, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. De Cremer, G.; Coutino-Gonzalez, E.; Roeffaers, M.B.; Moens, B.; Ollevier, J.; Van der Auweraer, M.; Schoonheydt, R.; Jacobs, P.A.; De Schryver, F.C.; Hofkens, J.; et al. Characterization of fluorescence in heat-treated silver-exchanged zeolites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3049–3056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sun, T.; Seff, K. Silver Clusters and Chemistry in Zeolites. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 857–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lamberti, C.; Prestipino, C.; Bordiga, S.; Fitch, A.N.; Marra, G.L. Characterization of isolated Ag cations in homoionic Ag-Y zeolites: A combined anomalous XRPD and EXAFS study. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2003, 200, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Miyanaga, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Narita, S.; Nakamura, R. Local structure change of luminescent Ag zeolite-A and -X studied by in situ XAFS and IR spectroscopy. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2020, 27, 1640–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Baekelant, W.; Aghakhani, S.; Coutino-Gonzalez, E.; Kennes, K.; D’Acapito, F.; Grandjean, D.; Van der Auweraer, M.; Lievens, P.; Roeffaers, M.B.J.; Hofkens, J.; et al. Shaping the Optical Properties of Silver Clusters Inside Zeolite A via Guest-Host-Guest Interactions. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 5344–5350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cuong, N.T.; Nguyen, H.M.; Nguyen, M.T. Theoretical modeling of optical properties of Ag8 and Ag14 silver clusters embedded in an LTA sodalite zeolite cavity. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 15404–15415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cuong, N.T.; Nguyen, H.M.; Pham-Ho, M.P.; Nguyen, M.T. Optical properties of the hydrated charged silver tetramer and silver hexamer encapsulated inside the sodalite cavity of an LTA-type zeolite. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 18128–18136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Selvam, T.; Warmuth, F.; Klumpp, M.; Warnick, K.G.; Lodes, M.A.; Korner, C.; Schwieger, W. Fabrication and pressure drop behavior of novel monolithic structures with zeolitic architectures. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 288, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Baekelant, W.; Aghakhani, S.; Fron, E.; Martin, C.; Woong-Kim, C.; Steele, J.A.; De Baerdemaeker, T.; d’Acapito, F.; Chernysov, D.; van der Auweraer, M.; et al. Luminescent silver–lithium-zeolite phosphors for near-ultraviolet LED applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 14366–14374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fenwick, O.; Coutino-Gonzalez, E.; Grandjean, D.; Baekelant, W.; Richard, F.; Bonacchi, S.; De Vos, D.; Lievens, P.; Roeffaers, M.; Hofkens, J.; et al. Tuning the energetics and tailoring the optical properties of silver clusters confined in zeolites. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 1017–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yu, J.; Ye, S.; Shi, Y.; Liao, H.; Xv, X.; Wang, D. Confinement of Highly Luminescent Silver Nanoclusters in FAUY Zeolite: A Study on the Formation Effects of Silver Nanoclusters and the Sensitization of Tb3+. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 6290–6298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shi, Y.L.; Ye, S.; Liao, H.Z.; Liu, J.F.; Wang, D.P. Formation of luminescent silver-clusters and efficient energy transfer to Eu3+ in faujasite NaX zeolite. J. Solid. State Chem. 2020, 285, 121227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hoshino, H.; Sannohe, Y.; Suzuki, Y.; Azuhata, T.; Miyanaga, T.; Yaginuma, K.; Itoh, M.; Shigeno, T.; Osawa, Y.; Kimura, Y. Photoluminescence of the Dehydrated Ag-type Zeolite A Packed under Air. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2008, 77, 064712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yao, D.; Wang, Y.; Li, P.; Li, H. Luminescent Ag(+) exchanged SOD zeolites with their potential applications in white LEDs. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 8179–8185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lin, H.; Imakita, K.; Fujii, M.; Prokof’ev, V.Y.; Gordina, N.E.; Said, B.; Galarneau, A. Visible emission from Ag(+) exchanged SOD zeolites. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 15665–15671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Frising, T.; Leflaive, P. Extraframework cation distributions in X and Y faujasite zeolites: A review. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2008, 114, 27–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Aono, H.; Yahara, K.; Johan, E.; Itagaki, Y. Effect of coexisting lithium content on fluorescent properties of silver ion-exchanged LTA zeolite. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2020, 128, 670–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, W.; Chai, Y.; Wu, G.; Li, L. Stable and Uniform Extraframework Cations in Faujasite Zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 11419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xv, X.; Ye, S.; Pan, L.; Lin, P.; Liao, H.; Wang, D. Tailoring the Luminescence Properties of Silver Clusters Confined in Faujasite Zeolite through Framework Modification. Materials 2022, 15, 7431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Qin, Z.; Shen, W.; Zhou, S.; Shen, Y.; Li, C.; Zeng, P.; Shen, B. Defect-assisted mesopore formation during Y zeolite dealumination: The types of defect matter. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020, 303, 110248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Groen, J.C.; Moulijn, J.A.; Pérez-Ramírez, J. Decoupling mesoporosity formation and acidity modification in ZSM-5 zeolites by sequential desilication–dealumination. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2005, 87, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Seifert, R.; Rytz, R.; Calzaferri, G. Colors of Ag+-Exchanged Zeolite A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 7473–7483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Seifert, R.; Kunzmann, A.; Calzaferri, G. The Yellow Color of Silver-Containing Zeolite A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1521–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lin, H.; Imakita, K.; Fujii, M. Reversible emission evolution from Ag activated zeolite Na-A upon dehydration/hydration. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 211903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fron, E.; Aghakhani, S.; Baekelant, W.; Grandjean, D.; Coutino-Gonzalez, E.; Van der Auweraer, M.; Roeffaers, M.B.J.; Lievens, P.; Hofkens, J. Structural and Photophysical Characterization of Ag Clusters in LTA Zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 10630–10638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shi, Y.; Ye, S.; Yu, J.; Liao, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, D. Simultaneous energy transfer from molecular-like silver nanoclusters to Sm3+/Ln3+ (Ln = Eu or Tb) in glass under UV excitation. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 38159–38167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yao, D.; Yang, J.; Xie, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, H. Warm white-light phosphor based on a single-phase of Ag+/Eu3+/Zn2+ loading SOD zeolites with application to white LEDs. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 823, 153778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Calzaferri, G.; Leiggener, C.; Glaus, S.; Schurch, D.; Kuge, K. The electronic structure of Cu+, Ag+, and Au+ zeolites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2003, 32, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sun, L.; Keshavarz, M.; Romolini, G.; Dieu, B.; Hofkens, J.; de Jong, F.; Fron, E.; Roeffaers, M.B.J.; Van der Auweraer, M. Origin of the polychromatic photoluminescence of zeolite confined Ag clusters: Temperature- and co-cation-dependent luminescence. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 11560–11569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chan, B. Re-examining the electronic structure of fluorescent tetra-silver clusters in zeolites. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 1984–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Baekelant, W.; Coutino-Gonzalez, E.; Steele, J.A.; Roeffaers, M.B.J.; Hofkens, J. Form Follows Function: Warming White LEDs Using Metal Cluster-Loaded Zeolites as Phosphors. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 2491–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhou, X.; Ren, T.; Yin, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, P.; Li, H. A full visible LED enabled by a broadband yellow emission nepheline phosphor derived from a europium doped SOD zeolite. J. Mater. Chem. C 2022, 10, 15613–15619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kennes, K.; Coutino-Gonzalez, E.; Martin, C.; Baekelant, W.; Roeffaers, M.B.J.; Van der Auweraer, M. Silver Zeolite Composites-Based LEDs: A Novel Solid-State Lighting Approach. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1606411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Alcantara, G.P.; Ribeiro, L.E.B.; Alves, A.F.; Andrade, C.M.G.; Fruett, F. Humidity sensor based on zeolite for application under environmental conditions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 247, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, L.; Xie, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Han, S.; Luan, H.; Meng, X.; Xiao, F.-S. Mn-promoted Ag supported on pure siliceous Beta zeolite (Ag/Beta-Si) for catalytic combustion of formaldehyde. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 268, 118461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, Y.; Dai, C.; Chen, B.; Wang, Y.; Shi, C.; Guo, X. Nanoscale HZSM-5 supported PtAg bimetallic catalysts for simultaneous removal of formaldehyde and benzene. Catal. Today 2015, 258, 616–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yao, D.; Wang, Y.; Li, H. Silver clusters based sensor for Low content formaldehyde detection in colorimetric and fluorometric dual Mode. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 305, 127451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yu, J.; Ye, S.; Xv, X.; Pan, L.; Lin, P.; Liao, H.; Wang, D. Thermal-Driven Formation of Silver Clusters Inside Na/Li FAUY Zeolites for Formaldehyde Detection. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Overlay between the averaged HAADF-STEM images and the silver atomic positions obtained from XRD along the [110] zone axis for Ag-FAUX (a) and FAUY (b) zeolites in luminescent states, and three-dimensional structural models for Ag-FAUX (c) and FAUY (d) [36].
Figure 1. Overlay between the averaged HAADF-STEM images and the silver atomic positions obtained from XRD along the [110] zone axis for Ag-FAUX (a) and FAUY (b) zeolites in luminescent states, and three-dimensional structural models for Ag-FAUX (c) and FAUY (d) [36].
Materials 16 03736 g001
Figure 2. Typical extra framework cation sites I(I’), II(II’, II*), III(III’), IV, and V in the structure of FAU zeolites (a) [57], and summary of the integrated emission intensity and peak position of MYxAg (M = 5Li, 2Li, Na, and 2Ca; x = 5, 10, 20, 30, and 50) (b) [29].
Figure 2. Typical extra framework cation sites I(I’), II(II’, II*), III(III’), IV, and V in the structure of FAU zeolites (a) [57], and summary of the integrated emission intensity and peak position of MYxAg (M = 5Li, 2Li, Na, and 2Ca; x = 5, 10, 20, 30, and 50) (b) [29].
Materials 16 03736 g002
Figure 3. Two-dimensional excited emission spectra of Ag-LTA zeolites with various concentrations of Li+ exchange (a), variations in lattice parameter of unit cell of LixNa12−x-LTA and LixNa11−xAg1−LTA zeolites and Agc−Agc distances of the tetrahedral Ag NCs in LixNa11−xAg1-LTA zeolites (b) [44].
Figure 3. Two-dimensional excited emission spectra of Ag-LTA zeolites with various concentrations of Li+ exchange (a), variations in lattice parameter of unit cell of LixNa12−x-LTA and LixNa11−xAg1−LTA zeolites and Agc−Agc distances of the tetrahedral Ag NCs in LixNa11−xAg1-LTA zeolites (b) [44].
Materials 16 03736 g003
Figure 4. Schematic description of desilication and dealumination processes, and the emission spectra of NaY−Ag, DSiY1−Ag, DSiY2−Ag, DAlYO1−Ag, DAlYO3−Ag, DAlYO5−Ag, and DAlYH−Ag [58].
Figure 4. Schematic description of desilication and dealumination processes, and the emission spectra of NaY−Ag, DSiY1−Ag, DSiY2−Ag, DAlYO1−Ag, DAlYO3−Ag, DAlYO5−Ag, and DAlYH−Ag [58].
Materials 16 03736 g004
Figure 5. Water dependence of the emission color observed in Ag1Li-LTA zeolite. In fully hydrated samples (19% water content) a green emission was found, whereas in partially hydrated samples a (2% water content) blue emission was recorded [34].
Figure 5. Water dependence of the emission color observed in Ag1Li-LTA zeolite. In fully hydrated samples (19% water content) a green emission was found, whereas in partially hydrated samples a (2% water content) blue emission was recorded [34].
Materials 16 03736 g005
Figure 6. Three-dimensional structure of Na-FAUX zeolite viewed along the [111] direction and Ag NCs located in the D6r cage (a), physical diagram of samples with different ratios of Ag+/Eu3+ exchange concentration (b) and energy transfer efficiency from Ag NCs to Eu3+ (c) [51].
Figure 6. Three-dimensional structure of Na-FAUX zeolite viewed along the [111] direction and Ag NCs located in the D6r cage (a), physical diagram of samples with different ratios of Ag+/Eu3+ exchange concentration (b) and energy transfer efficiency from Ag NCs to Eu3+ (c) [51].
Materials 16 03736 g006
Figure 7. Proposed emission mechanisms in Ag+ exchanged LTA (a) and SOD (b) zeolites [54]; simplified kinetic electron relaxation scheme for the processes observed upon photoexcitation of Ag1Li6Na5−LTA zeolite (λex = 265 nm), S* is Franck–Condon excited state (c) [68].
Figure 7. Proposed emission mechanisms in Ag+ exchanged LTA (a) and SOD (b) zeolites [54]; simplified kinetic electron relaxation scheme for the processes observed upon photoexcitation of Ag1Li6Na5−LTA zeolite (λex = 265 nm), S* is Franck–Condon excited state (c) [68].
Materials 16 03736 g007
Figure 8. Distribution of [Ag4(H2O)2]2+ and [Ag4(H2O)4]2+ in LTA zeolite sodalite cage (a), energy level structure diagram (b), two–dimensional excitation–emission plot, inset: the picture of an X–ray–irradiated sample under 366 nm illumination (c), and excitation spectrum of Ag3K9−LTA zeolite (λem = 555 nm) and modeled absorption spectra for the [Ag4(H2O)2]2+ and [Ag4(H2O)4]2+ isomers (d) [8].
Figure 8. Distribution of [Ag4(H2O)2]2+ and [Ag4(H2O)4]2+ in LTA zeolite sodalite cage (a), energy level structure diagram (b), two–dimensional excitation–emission plot, inset: the picture of an X–ray–irradiated sample under 366 nm illumination (c), and excitation spectrum of Ag3K9−LTA zeolite (λem = 555 nm) and modeled absorption spectra for the [Ag4(H2O)2]2+ and [Ag4(H2O)4]2+ isomers (d) [8].
Materials 16 03736 g008
Figure 9. White-emitting block on a COB device driven by current (a,b) [6], remote phosphor LED prototype using a thin layer of the green luminescent dehydrated Ag1Li11–LTA zeolite (c) [48].
Figure 9. White-emitting block on a COB device driven by current (a,b) [6], remote phosphor LED prototype using a thin layer of the green luminescent dehydrated Ag1Li11–LTA zeolite (c) [48].
Materials 16 03736 g009
Figure 10. A scheme displaying the color change of real samples (Ag1Li–LTA zeolite) with respect to the water content is depicted in the low-right panel [34].
Figure 10. A scheme displaying the color change of real samples (Ag1Li–LTA zeolite) with respect to the water content is depicted in the low-right panel [34].
Materials 16 03736 g010
Figure 11. Emission spectra of Ag−FAUY under different formaldehyde concentration (a), and emission intensity of Ag−FAUY at different formaldehyde concentration (I0: original, I1:at different formaldehyde concentration) (b) [76], and relative emission intensity of Ag NCs in Li−FAUY and Na−FAUY zeolites (c) [77].
Figure 11. Emission spectra of Ag−FAUY under different formaldehyde concentration (a), and emission intensity of Ag−FAUY at different formaldehyde concentration (I0: original, I1:at different formaldehyde concentration) (b) [76], and relative emission intensity of Ag NCs in Li−FAUY and Na−FAUY zeolites (c) [77].
Materials 16 03736 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pan, L.; Ye, S.; Xv, X.; Lin, P.; Huang, R.; Wang, D. Zeolite-Encaged Luminescent Silver Nanoclusters. Materials 2023, 16, 3736. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16103736

AMA Style

Pan L, Ye S, Xv X, Lin P, Huang R, Wang D. Zeolite-Encaged Luminescent Silver Nanoclusters. Materials. 2023; 16(10):3736. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16103736

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pan, Ling, Song Ye, Xinling Xv, Peixuan Lin, Ruihao Huang, and Deping Wang. 2023. "Zeolite-Encaged Luminescent Silver Nanoclusters" Materials 16, no. 10: 3736. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16103736

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop