Next Article in Journal
Improving the Durability of Lime Finishing Mortars by Modifying Them with Silicic Acid Sol
Next Article in Special Issue
Biosynthesis and Response of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles against Periimplantitis Triggering Pathogens
Previous Article in Journal
Wear Mechanism Classification Using Artificial Intelligence
Previous Article in Special Issue
Casein Microgels as Benzydamine Hydrochloride Carriers for Prolonged Release
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Genetics and Cytotoxic Responses to Titanium Diboride and Zinc Borate Nanoparticles on Cultured Human Primary Alveolar Epithelial Cells

1
Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey
2
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science, Erzurum Technical University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey
3
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey
4
Advanced Materials Research Laboratory, Department of Nanoscience & Nanoengineering, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Atatürk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey
5
Department of Internal Medicine, Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey
6
Department of Medical Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, Atatürk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey
7
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Art, Kilis 7 Aralık University, 79000 Kilis, Turkey
8
Department of Medical Genetics, Medical Faculty, Atatürk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey
9
Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Atatürk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey
10
Science for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, SE-17121 Stockholm, Sweden
11
Centre for Host-Microbiome Interactions, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(7), 2359; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072359
Submission received: 28 February 2022 / Revised: 14 March 2022 / Accepted: 20 March 2022 / Published: 22 March 2022

Abstract

:
Titanium diboride (TiB2) and zinc borate (Zn3BO6) have been utilized in wide spectrum industrial areas because of their favorable properties such as a high melting point, good wear resistance, high hardness and thermal conductivity. On the other hand, the biomedical potentials of TiB2 and Zn3BO6 are still unknown because there is no comprehensive analysis that uncovers their biocompatibility features. Thus, the toxicogenomic properties of TiB2 and Zn3BO6 nanoparticles (NPs) were investigated on human primary alveolar epithelial cell cultures (HPAEpiC) by using different cell viability assays and microarray analyses. Protein-Protein Interaction Networks Functional Enrichment Analysis (STRING) was used to associate differentially expressed gene probes. According to the results, up to 10 mg/L concentration of TiB2 and Zn3BO6 NPs application did not stimulate a cytotoxic effect on the HPAEpiC cell cultures. Microarray analysis revealed that TiB2 NPs exposure enhances cellular adhesion molecules, proteases and carrier protein expression. Furthermore, Zn3BO6 NPs caused differential gene expressions in the cell cycle, cell division and extracellular matrix regulators. Finally, STRING analyses put forth that inflammation, cell regeneration and tissue repair-related gene interactions were affected by TiB2 NPs application. Zn3BO6 NPs exposure significantly altered inflammation, lipid metabolism and infection response activator-related gene interactions. These investigations illustrated that TiB2 and Zn3BO6 NPs exposure may affect different aspects of cellular machineries such as immunogenic responses, tissue regeneration and cell survival. Thus, these types of cellular mechanisms should be taken into account before the use of the related NPs in further biomedical applications.

1. Introduction

Nanotechnology-based products have improved performance with an extended shelf life, but they come with public health concerns because of uncertain risks parallel to the development of the nanotechnological structures. Industrial areas accept that nanotechnology can improve the utilization areas of molecules in a variety of ways. On the other hand, society has many concerns about nanomaterial application due to the lack of understanding in different fields related to nanoparticle uses such as nuclear medicine and genetic modifications [1,2,3]. It is vital to increase public perceptions of risks and benefits to enable people to comprehend them in order for the field of nanotechnology to increase the social acceptance of emerging technologies [4]. Besides, there are many different molecules that can be used in nanotechnology fields such as ceramic nanoparticles, semiconductors, metal nanoparticles and polymeric nanoparticles. Each day, novel nanoparticles have been discovered and safety analyses for these compounds have been performed to enable their use in specific industries, from food sectors to medical applications [5].
Titanium diboride (TiB2) is known as ultrahigh-temperature ceramics (UHTCs) and belongs to the refractory transition metals family [6]. TiB2 exerts many favorable features such as excellent thermal conductivity, a high melting point, high hardness, high strength and good wear resistance [7,8,9]. Because of these properties, TiB2-based materials receive much attention from many industrial fields such as armor, cutting tools, high temperature structural materials, wear parts and electrode production [10]. TiB2 compounds can be found in corrosion-resistant electrical switch interfaces, ferrous metal polishing tools, aluminum extraction and scratch-resistant coating applications that are desired features for industrial and technological machineries [11]. Such compounds are often desired to have non-toxic properties to allow their full potential in a variety of applications and avoid human health risks. The biocompatibility of titanium–titanium boride (Ti-TiBw) composites for use in medical and dental implants was investigated with the results indicating that Ti-TiBw composite is blood biocompatible and not cytotoxic to fibroblast cells [12].
Zinc (Zn) molecules are essential components for cellular mechanisms such as the antioxidant response, the glutaminergic transmission in the brain, transcriptional regulations and enzyme activity. Zn deficiency can emerge with the aging process and the absence or reduction of the Zn element generally results in brain abnormalities, sensory dysfunctions, immunodeficiency and growth retardation [13,14,15]. Furthermore, Zinc borate (Zn3BO6) can used in different areas, for instance, smoke suppressants, antitracking agents and flame extinguishers [16]. Nano-sized Zn3BO6 molecules have been shown to possess less negative effects and higher flame retardancy compared to the ordinary flame extinguisher with homogenic dispersions and higher flame resistance [17]. In addition, an in vitro cytotoxicity analysis of zinc fructoborate (ZnFB) executed a low cytotoxic property and the use of this boron-containing compound was suggested as a nutritional molecule for Zn2+ supplementation instead of zinc orotate [18]. Moreover, in regards to providing modest antimutagenic potential, zinc borate was discovered to have moderate total antioxidant activity. With its antioxidative and antimutagenic qualities, zinc borate has the potential to be used in medicine [19].
Despite substantial research on these compounds, research into TiB2 and Zn3BO6 compounds for in vitro biological activities is limited and, to the authors’ knowledge, nothing is known about their biological properties and cytotoxic activities, which has prevented their usage in bio-applications thus far. In the current study, TiB2 or Zn3BO6 NPs were characterized by using X-ray crystallography (XRD), transmission electron microscope (TEM), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses and also tested for in vitro cytotoxic damage potentials on human primary alveolar epithelial cell cultures (HPAEpiCs) by different viability assays (MTT, LDH release and NR uptake cell viability assays). In addition, a whole-genome microarray analysis was performed to determine the differentially expressed genes in TiB2- or Zn3BO6 NPs-treated HPAEpiC cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Characterizations of Nanoparticles

Titanium diboride (TiB2) nanoparticles (Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA) were obtained commercially and particle characterization and verifications were performed. Zinc borate (Zn3BO6) nanoparticles were synthesized in a batch reactor by mixing 25 mL of distilled water, 7.5 g of boric acid (H3BO3, Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA), 2.846 g of zinc oxide (ZnO, Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA), 10 mL of pure ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 3g of oleic acid (Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA) in a 250 mL three-necked round-bottom container. Reaction was initiated by heating the mixture at 95 °C for 4 h. After the reaction period ended, white precipitates were filtrated and transferred to a fresh container, and the sample was washed 6 times with pure ethanol and water, sequentially. Samples were dried at 80 °C and nano-sized Zn3BO6 were characterized by using SEM, TEM and XRD techniques.
The structural analysis of TiB2 and Zn3BO6 nanoparticles were operated by using X-ray diffraction (XRD) via the use of a Rigaku diffractometer (Houston, TX, USA) with CuKα radiation operated at 40 kV and 30 mA at room temperature. Observations were performed with step of 0.020 in the geometry of coupled θ-2θ changed between 40 and 400, respectively. Particle sizes and surface morphologies of nanoparticles were investigated under a scanning electron microscope (FEI inspect S50 SEM, Hilsboro, OR, USA) and transmission electron microscopy (JEOL JEM-ARM200CFEG UHR-TEM, Tokyo, Japan).

2.2. Cell Cultures and NPs Applications

The human primary alveolar epithelial cell cultures (HPAEpiC, ScienceCell®, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were grown in 500 mL of alveolar epithelial cell medium (AEpiCM, ScieneCell®, Carlsbad, CA, USA), including 5 mL of penicillin/streptomycin solution (Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA), 5 mL of epithelial cell growth supplement and 10 mL of fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA). Cell cultures were grown in a humidified incubator (ThermoFisher®, Waltham, MA, USA) with 5% CO2 at 37 °C until cell densities reached 80% confluency. A total of 10 mg of each nanoparticle was placed into polypropylene tubes and dispersed in Milli-Q water (10 mL, at 25 °C, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using a sonification chamber (Spectra®, Carson, CA, USA). The total sonication time was 40 min (ultrasonication was performed for 20 min). To prevent heating during ultrasonic dispersion the tubes were kept at 0 °C in an ice-water bath. After autoclaving of 10 mg/mL NP/Milli-Q dispersions, the stock dispersions were stored in the dark at autoclaved and stored as stock dispersions at 4 °C. TiB2 and Zn3BO6 NPs were applied to the cell cultures for 72 h at a wide spectrum of concentrations (0.625 mg/L to 1280 mg/L) in triple repeats. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2; 25 μM, Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to cultures as the positive control for cytotoxicity analyses.

2.3. Cytotoxicity Testing

2.3.1. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium Bromide (MTT) Assay

For cell viability analyses 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT, ThermoFisher®, Waltham, MA, USA) assay was performed in NPs applications. MTT solution was prepared according to the manufacturer instructions and applied to cell cultures in 5 µM concentrations. Cell cultures were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 3 h to produce formazan crystals. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used to solve formazan crystals to obtain a blue-purple color as a cell viability indicator. A microplate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) was used to measure color intensities at 570 nm wavelength.

2.3.2. Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Release Assay

Cytotoxicity in cell cultures was investigated by using lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay. LDH assay (Cayman Chemical Company®, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) was performed in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Different concentrations of NPs were applied to cell cultures for 72 h in 48-well plates. A total of 100 µL of cell culture supernatants were transferred to fresh cell culture plates and 100 µL of reaction mixture was added to the cultures, and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in a dark place. Color intensities were measured by using a microplate reader at 490 nm absorbance.

2.3.3. Neutral Red (NR) Uptake Assay

Neutral red (NR, Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA) solution was applied to the cell cultures to observe cell viabilities in NP-administered cultures for 2 h at 37 °C. CaCl2 (0.25%, Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA) and formaldehyde (0.125%, Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA) mixture was used to remove excess NR solution in the cultures. Finally, acetic acid (1%, Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA) and ethanol (50%) mixture was added to the cell cultures and incubated at room temperature for 30 min to obtain red colors in each well. Color intensities were read at 540 nm absorbance by using a microplate reader.

2.4. Microarray Analysis

IC50 concentrations of NPs (Zn3BO6: 66.50 mg/L and TiB2: 104.34 mg/L) were applied to the cell cultures and total RNA isolation procedure was performed at the end of a 72 h duration. RNA isolations were performed by using a PureLink™ RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogene®, Waltham, MA, USA) and isolated RNA quality was investigated by using a bio-analyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and UV-visible spectrophotometer (NanoDrop®, ThermoFisher®, Waltham, MA, USA). A TargetAmp-Nano Labeling kit was used to amplify isolated RNAs and an Illumina Expression BeadChip (EPICENTRE, Madison, WI, USA) was utilized to obtain biotinylated cRNAs. By using a T7 oligo (dT) primer 500 ng of total RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA, second-strand cDNA was synthesized, in vitro transcribed, and labeled with biotin-NTP and cRNA was quantified using the ND-1000 Spectrophotometer. Human HT-12 v4.0 Expression Beadchip (Illumina Inc., SanDiego, CA, USA) hybridization was used to label cRNAs at 58 °C for 17 h. Amersham fluorolink streptavidin-Cy3 (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA) bead array was used to detect array signals. Array signals were read by using the Illumina bead array reader.

2.5. Data Analysis

SPSS program (IBM®, Endicott, NY, USA), Duncan’s test was performed for each experiment for statistical calculations at a significance level ≤ 0.05. Internal quality control checks of the raw data were used to analyze overall quality of hybridizations and chip performances. Illumina GenomeStudio v2011.1 (Gene Expression Module v1.9.0, Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) software was used to gather raw data according to the manufacturer instructions. Logarithmic transformations and normalizations of array probes were performed by using the quantile method. Fold-change values were used to show gene expressions and statistically significant differences. STRING analysis (Protein-Protein Interaction Networks Functional Enrichment Analysis) was performed for gene probes to assess differentially expressed gene relationships.

3. Results

The SEM image of TiB2 (Figure 1a) shows that the material has a very homogeneous granular structure. Particle sizes were monitored between 100–150 nm in TEM analysis (Figure 1b). The X-ray diffraction results showed that the most dominant peak was obtained at 2θ = 35.90. In addition, the values of 34 and 31.30, respectively, in the diffraction pattern of TiB2 appear as the other largest dominant peaks (Figure 1c). In addition, the crystalline structure of the material is clearly seen from the peaks in the diffraction pattern in Figure 1c. SEM analysis showed variable sizes of Zn3BO6 nanoparticles and confirms that the material has a highly heterogenic structure (Figure 2a). It was obtained from TEM images that the Zn3BO6 compound has particle sizes at the nano level ranging from 50 to 80 nm (Figure 2b). The high number of peaks in the diffraction pattern of Zn3BO6 indicates that the material grows in a polycrystalline structure (Figure 2c).
All of the performed cell viability assays (MTT, LDH and NR) indicated a clear concentration-dependent manner cytotoxicity. Boron NPs did not show cytotoxic effects at all concentrations below 20 mg/L (0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/L). TiB2 and Zn3BO6 NPs started to cause cytotoxicity at concentrations of 20 mg/L and above. IC50 values were calculated using probit analysis from the results obtained from the MTT assay. The toxicity potentials of the compounds were ranked according to their IC50 values. Zn3BO6 (IC50: 66.50 mg/L) was shown to be less cytotoxic than TiB2 (IC50: 104.34 mg/L) (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
As a result of microarray analysis performed in cells treated with TiB2, it was revealed that there were changes in the expression levels of 14 genes. It was observed that five of these genes had an increase in gene expression (Fold change ≥1.5) and there was a decrease in gene expression in nine of them. After the analysis, it was observed that the expression levels of FOS, FOSB (transcription factor) and MXRA5 (cellular adhesion molecule) genes decreased in cells after TiB2 application. In addition, there was an increase in the expression of genes such as MMP3 (protease) and ANXA10 (carrier protein). According to STRING (Protein-Protein Interaction Networks Functional Enrichment Analysis) analysis, DNA metabolic pathways were most affected in the cell. The immune system, defense mechanisms and many transcription factor pathways were affected by TiB2 treatment. Considering the number of affected genes, it was observed that there were significant changes in the expressions of genes involved in the immune system (Table 1 and Figure 5). Table 1 lists the 50 genes with the highest expression levels in lung epithelial cells treated with TiB2 NPs.
In the cells treated with Zn3BO6 NPs, it was determined that there were changes in the expression levels of 875 genes. Significant increase in gene expression (Fold change ≥2) was observed in 486 of these genes and a decrease in gene expression in 389. As a result of microarray analysis, it was seen that Zn3BO6 NPs is effective upon cell cycle and cell division. Different gene pathways such as responses in chromosomal regions, kinetochore organization and the regulation of extracellular matrix molecules are affected by Zn3BO6 NPs application. Again, after treatment with Zn3BO6 NPs, cell cycle in cells, cancer pathways and cytokine-receptor molecule regulation are affected. Table 2 presents 50 genes with the highest expression levels in lung epithelial cells treated with Zn3BO6 NPs.

4. Discussion

In the last decade, nanotechnology has been utilized in many different fields from industrial applications to food and health applications. Recently, boron-based nano-compound integrations into various technologies have begun to be discussed in many studies because of their superior and versatile properties [20,21,22,23]. Studies have claimed that inhalation is the most common route for NPs exposure and molecules are transferred from the upper respiratory tract to bronchioles by electrostatic force of the air. Thus, the HPAEpiC cell line is one of the most suitable cell culture models to study NP toxicity that can easily be contacted through the air [24]. In the present study, the toxicogenomic properties of TiB2 and Zn3BO6 NPs were investigated on HPAEpiC cell cultures by using three different cytotoxicity tests (MTT, LDH and NR assays) and microarray analyses to assess their applicability potentials for different areas. Furthermore, the physical characteristics of TiB2 and Zn3BO6 NPs were analyzed via the use of SEM, TEM and XRD techniques to determine their sizes and structures. SEM analyses put forth that commercially obtained TiB2 NPs had a very homogeneous granular structure and diffraction pattern peak investigations showed crystalline construction of TiB2 NPs. TEM investigations showed that TiB2 NPs had particle sizes of around 100–150 nm. Besides, the high number of peaks in the diffraction pattern of Zn3BO6 NPs indicated that the compound was grown in a polycrystalline structure. It was observed from the TEM images that Zn3BO6 NPs had particle sizes between 50 and 80 nm.
Moreover, cell viability analyses gave similar results stating that cytotoxic concentration for both TiB2 NPs and Zn3BO6 NPs enhanced at 20 mg/L for HPAEpiC cell cultures. On the other hand, when IC50 concentrations were calculated for each NP, TiB2 NPs had 104.348 mg/L and Zn3BO6 NPs had 66.506 mg/L concentration which decreased 50% of cellular populations in HPAEpiC cell cultures. IC50 concentrations of both TiB2 and Zn3BO6 NPs were applied to the cell cultures for 72 h and at the end of the incubation period microarray analyses were performed by isolating total RNAs from the cell cultures. Differentially expressed gene probes were associated by using STRING (Protein-Protein Interaction Networks Functional Enrichment Analysis) analysis to understand the regulatory properties of TiB2 and Zn3BO6 NPs on the HPAEpiC cell line [25]. STRING analysis showed that prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2), matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP3), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1) and DExD-box helicase 52 (DDX52) differentially expressed gene probes were strongly correlated with other gene groups with respect to TiB2 NPs application (Figure 5). Furthermore, apolipoprotein E (APOE), C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), chitinase 3 like 1 (CHI3L1) and matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP3) gene probes were found to have strong relationships with other gene probes that were differentially expressed in HPAEpiC cell cultures against Zn3BO6 NPs exposure (Figure 6).
Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase (PTGS), also referred to as cyclooxygenase, acts as both dioxygenase and peroxidase in prostaglandin biosynthesis. Gene regulation was stimulated by the different factors by which the biosynthesis of prostanoids can enhance mitogenesis and inflammation [26]. Furthermore, the regenerative cell survival and wound healing properties of PTGS were investigated in different tissue types [27,28,29]. In the present study, TiB2 application was found to increase PTGS gene expression in HPAEpiC cell cultures indicating the enhanced regenerative status. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) proteins play an important role in physiological processes such as reproduction, embryonic development and tissue remodeling, and are also known to be effective in disease progressions such as metastasis and arthritis [30,31]. MMP proteins were shown to be secreted as inactive forms and activated by extracellular proteinases. These enzymes were shown to degrade laminin, fibronectin, cartilage proteoglycans and various collagens. MMP enzymes were shown in different studies to have crucial roles in tissue repair, tumor initiation and atherosclerosis progression [32,33,34]. Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1) is a cell surface glycoprotein typically expressed in immune and endothelial cells. It binds to CD11b/CD18 and CD11a/CD18 type integrins used as viral attachments to a receptor [35,36]. Furthermore, a previous study showed that ICAM1 overexpression in mesenchymal stem cells could be a useful tool for immune-regulator dendritic cells (DCs) and T cells in vivo and in vitro [37]. DExD-box helicase 52 (DDX52) was investigated to have important roles in different cellular processes such as cellular RNA metabolism, translation, transcription and infections [38]. Moreover, DDX52 helicase was shown to regulate innate immunity against viral infections and enhance cellular processes to prevent viral replications [39,40].
Apolipoprotein E (APOE) was found to encode chylomicron apoproteins that interact with a specific peripheral and liver cell receptor to play an essential role for triglyceride-rich lipoprotein catabolism [41,42]. Previous studies showed that APOE mutant mice could be a good chronic obstructive pulmonary disease model exhibiting emphysema, pulmonary inflammation and airway obstruction. Furthermore, the mutant models share common risk factors with other cardiovascular diseases [43,44,45]. In our study, the APOE gene was found to be upregulated with respect to Zn3BO6 NPs application to HPAEpiC cell line. On the other hand, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) was observed to be downregulated in HPAEpiC cell cultures against Zn3BO6 NPs exposure. CCL2 was investigated as a member of the chemokine superfamily involved in inflammatory and immunoregulatory processes [46,47]. It was found that the overexpression of the CCL2 gene was closely related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [48,49]. Chitinase 3 like 1 (CHI3L1) protein was shown to catalyze chitin hydrolysis and was highly expressed in fungal cell walls and insect exoskeletons [50]. Furthermore, eight human CHI3L1 gene family members were found to encode glycosyl hydrolase that was expressed in neutrophils, macrophages and chondrocytes which play important role in tissue remodeling and inflammation [51,52].
In the light of the observations, different cell viability assays revealed that TiB2 and Zn3BO6 NPs exhibited low cytotoxic properties upon HPAEpiC cell cultures for the first time. Furthermore, microarray analyses showed that differentially expressed genes with respect to TiB2 NPs application were closely related to inflammation, cell regeneration and tissue repair. Moreover, TiB2 NPs exposure was observed to upregulate gene expression associated with immunological regulations. Besides, Zn3BO6 NPs application was analyzed to have an inhibitory effect on pulmonary inflammation, regulatory properties on lipid metabolism and infection response. Both of the boron compounds were found to have common stimulatory features on HPAEpiC cell cultures such as immunological responses and tissue regeneration. To conclude, TiB2 and Zn3BO6 NPs were investigated as low toxic compounds when exposed to a human pulmonary alveolar cell culture and might not cause dramatic side effects under certain conditions. On the other hand, further animal studies should be performed before recommending TiB2 and Zn3BO6 NPs as biocompatible materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.T.; formal analysis, E.S. and B.C.; investigation, A.T. (Arzu Tatar), Ö.Ö., A.H., C.Y.K., A.T. (Abdulgani Tatar) and A.M.; methodology, A.T. (Arzu Tatar), Ö.Ö., E.S., K.Ç., B.C., M.A. and F.G.; project administration, A.T. (Arzu Tatar), A.H., A.T. (Abdulgani Tatar) and A.M.; resources, M.A.; software, C.Y.K.; supervision, H.T., F.G. and A.M.; validation, M.E.A., K.Ç. and C.Y.K.; visualization, A.T. (Abdulgani Tatar); writing—original draft, H.T., M.E.A. and Ö.Ö.; writing—review and editing, M.E.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The National Boron Research Institute (BOREN) supported this research with Grant No: Ç0391.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ali, M.A.M. DEAD-box RNA helicases: The driving forces behind RNA metabolism at the crossroad of viral replication and antiviral innate immunity. Virus Res. 2021, 296, 198352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Arunachalam, G.; Sundar, I.K.; Hwang, J.-W.; Yao, H.; Rahman, I. Emphysema is associated with increased inflammation in lungs of atherosclerosis-prone mice by cigarette smoke: Implications in comorbidities of COPD. J. Inflamm. 2010, 7, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Basu, B.; Raju, G.B.; Suri, A.K. Processing and properties of monolithic TiB2based materials. Int. Mater. Rev. 2006, 51, 352–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Benelli, R.; Venè, R.; Ferrari, N. Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (cyclooxygenase-2), a complex target for colorectal cancer prevention and therapy. Transl. Res. 2018, 196, 42–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bilgi, E.; Camurlu, H.E.; Akgün, B.; Topkaya, Y.; Sevinç, N. Formation of TiB2 by volume combustion and mechanochemical process. Mater. Res. Bull. 2008, 43, 873–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cacciatore, I.; Turkez, H.; Di Rienzo, A.; Ciulla, M.; Mardinoglu, A.; Di Stefano, A. Boron-based hybrids as novel scaffolds for the development of drugs with neuroprotective properties. RSC Med. Chem. 2021, 12, 1944–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chait, A.; Ginsberg, H.N.; Vaisar, T.; Heinecke, J.W.; Goldberg, I.J.; Bornfeldt, K.E. Remnants of the Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins, Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Disease. Diabetes 2020, 69, 508–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, W.; Jiang, X.; Yang, Q. Glycoside hydrolase family 18 chitinases: The known and the unknown. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020, 43, 107553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chenel, V.; Boissy, P.; Cloarec, J.-P.; Patenaude, J. Effects of disciplinary cultures of researchers and research trainees on the acceptability of nanocarriers for drug delivery in different contexts of use: A mixed-methods study. J. Nanopart. Res. 2015, 17, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Cohn, S.M.; Schloemann, S.; Tessner, T.; Seibert, K.; Stenson, W.F. Crypt stem cell survival in the mouse intestinal epithelium is regulated by prostaglandins synthesized through cyclooxygenase-1. J. Clin. Investig. 1997, 99, 1367–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cruz, K.J.C. Antioxidant role of zinc in diabetes mellitus. World J. Diabetes 2015, 6, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Currall, S.C.; King, E.B.; Lane, N.; Madera, J.; Turner, S. What drives public acceptance of nanotechnology? Nat. Nanotechnol. 2006, 1, 153–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mahaseni, Z.H.; Germi, M.D.; Ahmadi, Z.; Asl, M.S. Microstructural investigation of spark plasma sintered TiB2 ceramics with Si3N4 addition. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 13367–13372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Han, J.; Hong, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, B. Thermal shock resistance of TiB2–Cu interpenetrating phase composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 1711–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hegener, H.H.; Diehl, K.A.; Kurth, T.; Gaziano, J.M.; Ridker, P.M.; Zee, R.Y.L. Polymorphisms of prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 gene, and prostaglandin-E receptor 2 gene, C-reactive protein concentrations and risk of atherothrombosis: A nested case?control approach. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2006, 4, 1718–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ipek, Y. Effect of surfactant types on particle size and morphology of flame-retardant zinc borate powder. Turk. J. Chem. 2020, 44, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jensen, M.S.; Grande, T.; Einarsrud, M.-A. The Effect of Surface Oxides During Hot Pressing of TiB2. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 92, 623–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Joseph, A.; Joshi, G.M. High performance of fluoro polymer modified by hexa-titanium boride nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 4749–4769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Joshi, N.; Kumar, D.; Poluri, K.M. Elucidating the Molecular Interactions of Chemokine CCL2 Orthologs with Flavonoid Baicalin. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 22637–22651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kerkelä, E.; Saarialho-Kere, U. Matrix metalloproteinases in tumor progression: Focus on basal and squamous cell skin cancer. Exp. Dermatol. 2003, 12, 109–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khan, I.; Saeed, K.; Khan, I. Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 908–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kumar, A.; Zhang, K.Y.J. Human Chitinases: Structure, Function, and Inhibitor Discovery. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; Volume 1142, pp. 221–251. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lamers, C.; Plüss, C.J.; Ricklin, D. The Promiscuous Profile of Complement Receptor 3 in Ligand Binding, Immune Modulation, and Pathophysiology. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 662164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, H.; Yang, Z.; Lu, W.; Chen, Z.; Chen, L.; Han, S.; Wu, X.; Cai, T.; Cai, Y. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: A new strategy for breast cancer therapy. Cancer Med. 2020, 9, 3786–3799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Szklarczyk, D.; Franceschini, A.; Wyder, S.; Forslund, K.; Heller, D.; Huerta-Cepas, J.; Simonovic, M.; Roth, A.; Santos, A.; Tsafou, K.P.; et al. STRING v10: Protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D447–D452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Makau, F.M.; Morsi, K.; Gude, N.; Alvarez, R.; Sussman, M.; May-Newman, K. Viability of Titanium-Titanium Boride Composite as a Biomaterial. ISRN Biomater. 2013, 2013, 970535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Mehta, A.; Shapiro, M.D. Apolipoproteins in vascular biology and atherosclerotic disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2022, 19, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mirzaei, R.; Mahdavi, F.; Badrzadeh, F.; Hosseini-Fard, S.R.; Heidary, M.; Jeda, A.S.; Mohammadi, T.; Roshani, M.; Yousefimashouf, R.; Keyvani, H.; et al. The emerging role of microRNAs in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 90, 107204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mittal, R.; Patel, A.P.; Debs, L.H.; Nguyen, D.; Patel, K.; Grati, M.; Mittal, J.; Yan, D.; Chapagain, P.; Liu, X.Z. Intricate Functions of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Physiological and Pathological Conditions. J. Cell. Physiol. 2016, 231, 2599–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mlera, L.; Meade-White, K.; Dahlstrom, E.; Baur, R.; Kanakabandi, K.; Virtaneva, K.; Porcella, S.F.; Bloom, M.E. Peromyscus leucopus mouse brain transcriptome response to Powassan virus infection. J. Neuro Virol. 2018, 24, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Mrugacz, M.; Bryl, A.; Falkowski, M.; Zorena, K. Integrins: An Important Link between Angiogenesis, Inflammation and Eye Diseases. Cells 2021, 10, 1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Murphy, G.; E Cawston, T.; A Galloway, W.; Barnes, M.J.; Bunning, R.A.D.; Mercer, E.; Reynolds, J.J.; E Burgeson, R. Metalloproteinases from rabbit bone culture medium degrade types IV and V collagens, laminin and fibronectin. Biochem. J. 1981, 199, 807–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Nawaz, M.; Shah, N.; Zanetti, B.R.; Maugeri, M.; Silvestre, R.N.; Fatima, F.; Neder, L.; Valadi, H. Extracellular Vesicles and Matrix Remodeling Enzymes: The Emerging Roles in Extracellular Matrix Remodeling, Progression of Diseases and Tissue Repair. Cells 2018, 7, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Nyska, A.; Lomnitski, L.; Maronpot, R.; Moomaw, C.; Brodsky, B.; Sintov, A.; Wormser, U. Effects of iodine on inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 expression in sulfur mustard-induced skin injury in guinea pigs. Arch. Toxicol. 2001, 74, 768–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Oancea, C.N.; Cîmpean, A. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Zinc Fructoborate, a Novel Zinc-Boron Active Natural Complex. Curr. Health Sci. J. 2018, 44, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sharma, S.; Ebadi, M. Significance of metallothioneins in aging brain. Neurochem. Int. 2014, 65, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shen, L.; Pelletier, J. General and Target-Specific DExD/H RNA Helicases in Eukaryotic Translation Initiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shen, W.; Li, Y.; Tang, Y.; Cummins, J.; Huard, J. NS-398, a Cyclooxygenase-2-Specific Inhibitor, Delays Skeletal Muscle Healing by Decreasing Regeneration and Promoting Fibrosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2005, 167, 1105–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Stone, V.; Führ, M.; Feindt, P.H.; Bouwmeester, H.; Linkov, I.; Sabella, S.; Murphy, F.; Bizer, K.; Tran, L.; Ågerstrand, M.; et al. The Essential Elements of a Risk Governance Framework for Current and Future Nanotechnologies. Risk Anal. 2018, 38, 1321–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tang, B.; Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, X.; Chu, Y.; Zhu, H.; Liu, W.; Xu, F.; Zhou, F.; et al. The Therapeutic Effect of ICAM-1-Overexpressing Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 46, 2624–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Titz, B.; Boue, S.; Phillips, B.; Talikka, M.; Vihervaara, T.; Schneider, T.; Nury, C.; Elamin, A.; Guedj, E.; Peck, M.J.; et al. Effects of Cigarette Smoke, Cessation, and Switching to Two Heat-Not-Burn Tobacco Products on Lung Lipid Metabolism in C57BL/6 and Apoe-/- Mice-An Integrative Systems Toxicology Analysis. Toxicol. Sci. 2016, 149, 441–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Türkez, H.; Arslan, M.E.; Sönmez, E.; Tatar, A.; Geyikoğlu, F.; Açikyildiz, M.; Mardinoğlu, A. Safety Assessments of Nickel Boride Nanoparticles on the Human Pulmonary Alveolar Cells by Using Cell Viability and Gene Expression Analyses. Biol. Trace Element Res. 2021, 199, 2602–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Türkez, H.; Arslan, M.E.; Sönmez, E.; Geyikoğlu, F.; Açıkyıldız, M.; Tatar, A. Microarray assisted toxicological investigations of boron carbide nanoparticles on human primary alveolar epithelial cells. Chem. Interact. 2019, 300, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Türkez, H.; Arslan, M.E.; Sönmez, E.; Tatar, A.; Açikyildiz, M.; Geyikoğlu, F. Toxicogenomic responses of human alveolar epithelial cells to tungsten boride nanoparticles. Chem. Interact. 2017, 273, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ugur, A.; Ceylan, O.; Boran, R.; Ayrıkçil, S.; Sarac, N.; Yilmaz, D. A new approach for prevention the oxidations and mutations: Zinc borate. J. Boron 2019, 4, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Üreyen, M.E.; Kaynak, E. Effect of Zinc Borate on Flammability of PET Woven Fabrics. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2019, 2019, 7150736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. van Giesen, R.I.; Fischer, A.R.; van Trijp, H.C. Changes in the influence of affect and cognition over time on consumer attitude formation toward nanotechnology: A longitudinal survey study. Public Underst. Sci. 2018, 27, 168–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Werynska, B.; Pula, B.; Kobierzycki, C.; Dziegiel, P.; Podhorska-Okolow, M. Metallothioneins in the lung cancer. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 2015, 53, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Wlodarczyk, J.; Mukhina, I.; Kaczmarek, L.; Dityatev, A. Extracellular matrix molecules, their receptors, and secreted proteases in synaptic plasticity. Dev. Neurobiol. 2011, 71, 1040–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wu, Y.-H.; Yeh, I.-J.; Phan, N.N.; Yen, M.-C.; Liu, H.-L.; Wang, C.-Y.; Hsu, H.-P. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 infection induces dysregulation of immunity: In silico gene expression analysis. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 18, 1143–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yah, C.S.; Iyuke, S.E.; Simate, G.S. A review of nanoparticles toxicity and their routes of exposures. Iran. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 8, 299–314. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ziatabar, S.; Zepf, J.; Rich, S.; Danielson, B.T.; Bollyky, P.I.; Stern, R. Chitin, chitinases, and chitin lectins: Emerging roles in human pathophysiology. Pathophysiology 2018, 25, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Characterization of titanium diboride (TiB2) NPs. (a) scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis of TiB2 NPs, (b) transmission electron microscope (TEM) analysis of TiB2 NPs and (c) X-ray crystallography (XRD) analysis of TiB2 NPs.
Figure 1. Characterization of titanium diboride (TiB2) NPs. (a) scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis of TiB2 NPs, (b) transmission electron microscope (TEM) analysis of TiB2 NPs and (c) X-ray crystallography (XRD) analysis of TiB2 NPs.
Materials 15 02359 g001
Figure 2. Characterization of zinc borate (Zn3BO6) NPs. (a) scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis of Zn3BO6 NPs, (b) transmission electron microscope (TEM) analysis of Zn3BO6 NPs and (c) X-ray crystallography (XRD) analysis of Zn3BO6 NPs.
Figure 2. Characterization of zinc borate (Zn3BO6) NPs. (a) scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis of Zn3BO6 NPs, (b) transmission electron microscope (TEM) analysis of Zn3BO6 NPs and (c) X-ray crystallography (XRD) analysis of Zn3BO6 NPs.
Materials 15 02359 g002
Figure 3. Cell viability assay of titanium diboride (TiB2) NPs on human pulmonary alveolar cells. (a) 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) cell viability analysis of TiB2 NPs, (b) lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxicity analysis TiB2 NPs and (c) neutral red (NR) cell viability analysis of TiB2 NPs on human pulmonary alveolar cells. * SPSS program, Duncan’s test was performed for each experiment for statistical calculations at a significance level ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3. Cell viability assay of titanium diboride (TiB2) NPs on human pulmonary alveolar cells. (a) 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) cell viability analysis of TiB2 NPs, (b) lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxicity analysis TiB2 NPs and (c) neutral red (NR) cell viability analysis of TiB2 NPs on human pulmonary alveolar cells. * SPSS program, Duncan’s test was performed for each experiment for statistical calculations at a significance level ≤ 0.05.
Materials 15 02359 g003aMaterials 15 02359 g003b
Figure 4. Cell viability assay of zinc borate (Zn3BO6) NPs on human pulmonary alveolar cells. (a) 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) cell viability analysis of Zn3BO6 NPs, (b) lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxicity analysis Zn3BO6NPs and (c) neutral red (NR) cell viability analysis of Zn3BO6 NPs on human pulmonary alveolar cells. * SPSS program (SPSS®, USA), Duncan’s test was performed for each experiment for statistical calculations at a significance level ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4. Cell viability assay of zinc borate (Zn3BO6) NPs on human pulmonary alveolar cells. (a) 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) cell viability analysis of Zn3BO6 NPs, (b) lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxicity analysis Zn3BO6NPs and (c) neutral red (NR) cell viability analysis of Zn3BO6 NPs on human pulmonary alveolar cells. * SPSS program (SPSS®, USA), Duncan’s test was performed for each experiment for statistical calculations at a significance level ≤ 0.05.
Materials 15 02359 g004
Figure 5. String analysis of titanium diboride (TiB2) NPs.
Figure 5. String analysis of titanium diboride (TiB2) NPs.
Materials 15 02359 g005
Figure 6. String analysis of zinc borate (Zn3BO6) NPs.
Figure 6. String analysis of zinc borate (Zn3BO6) NPs.
Materials 15 02359 g006
Table 1. Gene expression changes with respect to titanium diboride (TiB2) NPs application.
Table 1. Gene expression changes with respect to titanium diboride (TiB2) NPs application.
Titanium Diboride
Fold Change (FC)
Upregulated ExpressionsFCDownregulated ExpressionsFC
CXCL51.81FOS−1.88
GINS41.80MGC24103−1.69
MMP31.67LOC100132564−1.67
ANXA101.53MXRA5−1.58
PTGS21.50RPS29−1.57
PTGS21.47FOSB−1.52
BEX21.47INMT−1.51
CXCL51.45LOC100134259−1.50
NEBL1.41MGC4677−1.50
SERPINB21.41LOC728499−1.47
IL13RA21.41FAM65C−1.46
DIRAS31.40C7orf54−1.45
ASNS1.40BAALC−1.41
NGDN1.39STARD13−1.41
CRLF11.38IFIT1−1.40
PTPRH1.37SOCS3−1.39
LOC1436661.34PDGFRB−1.38
ICAM11.34TNFRSF11B−1.37
AGTR11.33HEYL−1.37
LOC1000085881.32EGR3−1.37
RPP251.32WDR33−1.36
DDX521.32NEDD9−1.36
LOC4412531.32CRIP1−1.36
RRAD1.32NDRG4−1.34
SLC8A31.31HIST2H2BE−1.34
Table 2. Gene expression changes with respect to zinc borate (Zn3BO6) NPs application.
Table 2. Gene expression changes with respect to zinc borate (Zn3BO6) NPs application.
Zinc Borate
Fold Change (FC)
Upregulated ExpressionsFCDownregulaed ExpressionsFC
APOE22.44NPTX1−15.36
ADH1A20.48SERPINB2−6.68
IGFBP316.88ESM1−6.55
IGFBP315.34SERPINB2−5.80
CFD14.08LOC728285−5.54
PTGDS13.67MMP1−4.63
MFAP413.41CCL2−4.57
RGS412.28NPTX1−4.57
SERPINA311.94ESM1−4.48
CXCL1210.54INSIG1−4.45
FOS10.25NPTX1−4.28
PARM19.60KRT19−4.27
AMPH9.38LOC100134073−4.16
ANGPT18.62KRT34−4.12
A2M8.47H2AFY2−4.09
CXCL128.31LOC728255−4.08
CHL17.68GPR68−4.04
HSD17B27.58TNFSF4−3.94
FMO27.50E2F7−3.92
CFTR7.47HMGCS1−3.87
H197.40RGMB−3.77
CHI3L17.39SC4MOL−3.74
FOSB7.37MMP3−3.73
CORO67.36TMEM166−3.69
FER1L47.32TNFSF4−3.68
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Türkez, H.; Arslan, M.E.; Tatar, A.; Özdemir, Ö.; Sönmez, E.; Çadirci, K.; Hacimüftüoğlu, A.; Ceylan, B.; Açikyildiz, M.; Kahraman, C.Y.; et al. Molecular Genetics and Cytotoxic Responses to Titanium Diboride and Zinc Borate Nanoparticles on Cultured Human Primary Alveolar Epithelial Cells. Materials 2022, 15, 2359. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072359

AMA Style

Türkez H, Arslan ME, Tatar A, Özdemir Ö, Sönmez E, Çadirci K, Hacimüftüoğlu A, Ceylan B, Açikyildiz M, Kahraman CY, et al. Molecular Genetics and Cytotoxic Responses to Titanium Diboride and Zinc Borate Nanoparticles on Cultured Human Primary Alveolar Epithelial Cells. Materials. 2022; 15(7):2359. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072359

Chicago/Turabian Style

Türkez, Hasan, Mehmet Enes Arslan, Arzu Tatar, Özlem Özdemir, Erdal Sönmez, Kenan Çadirci, Ahmet Hacimüftüoğlu, Bahattin Ceylan, Metin Açikyildiz, Cigdem Yuce Kahraman, and et al. 2022. "Molecular Genetics and Cytotoxic Responses to Titanium Diboride and Zinc Borate Nanoparticles on Cultured Human Primary Alveolar Epithelial Cells" Materials 15, no. 7: 2359. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072359

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop