Next Article in Journal
Low-Temperature Dielectric Response of Strontium Titanate Thin Films Manipulated by Zn Doping
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Root–Soil Composite Reinforced by MICP
Previous Article in Journal
Long-Term Leaching Behavior of Organic and Inorganic Pollutants after Wet Processing of Solid Waste Materials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Setting Times of Early-Age Mortars Determined from Evolution Curves of Poisson’s Ratio
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Migration and Deposition Behaviors of Montmorillonite and Kaolinite Particles in a Two-Dimensional Micromodel

Materials 2022, 15(3), 855; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15030855
by Bate Bate, Chao Chen, Pengfei Liu, Chen Zhou, Xiao Chen, Shaokai Nie, Kexin Chen *, Yunmin Chen and Shuai Zhang *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Materials 2022, 15(3), 855; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15030855
Submission received: 14 October 2021 / Revised: 2 December 2021 / Accepted: 3 December 2021 / Published: 23 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Soil as an Engineering Material)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript has depicted some interesting results.

However, I suggest author to mention repetition of each analysis.

I also recommend to explain Little more about the real world situation and it’s application.

I suggest authors to focus more into the discussions part of the manuscript as it is not well written and there is a chance of improvement. 

Author Response

Regarding English writing and style, I had my manuscript checked by a professional English editor. In addition, I added the application of this research about the real world situation in the third section of the discussion part.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Manuscript Number: materials-1442188

Manuscript titled “A New Predictive Model of Glyphosate Sorption in Soil based on pH and Phosphorus Buffering Index” by Styles et al.

This manuscript has several minor drawbacks, making it unacceptable for publication in the current format.

 

 

Minor drawbacks and recommended improvements

1

 

The Keywords: microfluidic model, clay particle and deposition are in the title. I suggest that the authors should replace it with other keywords that must be specific.

2

Line 48, 201, 277

The authors should incorporate references.

3

Line 75-83

The authors should move this equation to line 156.

4

Line 114

The authors should move Figure 1 to Supplementary Information.

5

 

The authors should number the equations.

6

Line 182

Where is the term in these equations? (line 179-181).

7

Line 195

The authors should cite other studies in a similar system to validate their results concerning the factors that contributed to the deposition and clogging behaviors.

8

Line 220-221

The authors should move this sentence to section 2.

9

Line 267-274

The authors should move this sentence to section 2.3.

10

Line 278-279

The authors should indicate the number of the equation to calculate the hydrodynamic force  in the following sentence: “The hydrodynamic force induced by flow of fluid on migrating particles, also known as drag force, was calculated (eq. …) …”

11

Line 297

The authors should cite other studies in a similar system to validate their results concerning particle deposition.

Author Response

The Keywords: microfluidic model, clay particle and deposition have been replaced

   
  1. 2

Line 48, 201, 277

I have incorporated references.

3

Line 75-83

This equation has been moved to line 156.

4

tLine 114

Figure 1 has been moved to Supplementary Information.

5

 

The authors should number the equations.

6

Line 182

The term in these equations (line 179-181) has been added.

7

Line 195

I have added other studies in a similar system to validate their results concerning the factors that contributed to the deposition and clogging behaviors.

8

Line 220-221

This sentence have been moved to section 2.

9

Line 267-274

This sentence has been moved to section 2.3.

10

Line 278-279

The equations of hydrodynamic  drag force have been added.

11

Line 297

 Other studies in a similar system have been added to validate their results concerning particle deposition.

 

 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The main question addressed by the research is the deposition and clogging behaviors of fine particle using kaolin and bentonite suspensions and the topic is original and relevant in the field of computational fluid dynamics due to the introduction of suspensions of kaolin and bentonite.

The development of microfluidic models were developed to simulate the pore structure of a porous 34 media with unified particle sizes in the current study and the conclusions are consistent with the evidence and arguments presented and address the main question.

The work is novel and the presentation is sound. I think the authors could consider the study of seepage through the porous media regarding the methodology.

Author Response

Please see the attactment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop