Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Slag/Fly Ash Ratio and Sodium Silicate Modulus on the Properties of 1-3-2 Alkali-Based Piezoelectric Composite
Next Article in Special Issue
Algorithmic-Aided Approach for the Design and Evaluation of Curvilinear Steel Bar Structures of Unit Roofs
Previous Article in Journal
Magnesium-Based Alloys Used in Orthopedic Surgery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Material Anisotropy on the Mechanical Response of Automotive Steel under High Strain Rates
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Influence of Mechanical Deformations on the Characteristic Impedance of Sewed Textile Signal Lines

Materials 2022, 15(3), 1149; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15031149
by Paweł Kubiak 1,* and Jacek Leśnikowski 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Materials 2022, 15(3), 1149; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15031149
Submission received: 10 November 2021 / Revised: 12 January 2022 / Accepted: 29 January 2022 / Published: 2 February 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

    The function and stability of the power and data transmitting lines is of great importance in textile-based devices. However, the lines in textiles are faced with complex environment during daily use. I think the authors choosed a very practical  research point which is really critical for textronics. For the publication, I would like to give some suggestions.

  1. The authors introduced the prospects, principles and applications of the power and data transmitting lines in great detail. A series of factors, such as temperature, humidity, and deformation, that may affect the performance of the wire are put forward, but in the follow-up research, only the characteristic resistance curve under different weaves and different degrees of deformation is studied. Whether there will be a feeling of top-heavy, it is recommended to focus on the key factors of verification.
  2. The author gave the characteristic resistance changes under different waves and loads, but did not explain what structural changes caused the signal fluctuations. Could you please further elaborate on some structure-related mechanisms and put forward some suggestions for improvement.
  3. Can the author provide some higher-quality images? In some graphs, there are more overlapping curves, which can easily lose data details.
  4. The authors should carefully cheak the typos of the manuscript.

 

Author Response

The author would like to thank the Associate Editor and the Reviewers for giving their valuable time in carefully reading the manuscript and providing constructive comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the manuscript.

The author has revised the paper accordingly. All modifications and changes are indicated by highlighting the text.

The following responses have been prepared to address all of the Reviewers’ remarks.

Please find the responses attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Kindly go through my comments attached here

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The author would like to thank the Associate Editor and the Reviewers for giving their valuable time in carefully reading the manuscript and providing constructive comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the manuscript.

The author has revised the paper accordingly. All modifications and changes are indicated by highlighting the text.

The following responses have been prepared to address all of the Reviewers’ remarks.

Please find the responses attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

  1. the author didn’t organize the manuscript logically and they spent too much illustration on what others have done rather than their own work.
  2. No details of the methodology and materials they used could be found in the manuscript. Besides, error ranges of the data are too broad that the statistics are not representative. I suggest expanding the sample size and doing more statistical analysis.

Author Response

The author would like to thank the Associate Editor and the Reviewers for giving their valuable time in carefully reading the manuscript and providing constructive comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the manuscript.

The author has revised the paper accordingly. All modifications and changes are indicated by highlighting the text.

The following responses have been prepared to address all of the Reviewers’ remarks.

Please find the responses attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Well answered

Back to TopTop