Next Article in Journal
Remarkable Reduction in IG with an Explicit Investigation of the Leakage Conduction Mechanisms in a Dual Surface-Modified Al2O3/SiO2 Stack Layer AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMT
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Interfacial Strength on Mechanical Behavior of Be/2024Al Composites by Pressure Infiltration
Previous Article in Journal
Transparent Wood-Based Materials: Current State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thin-Copper-Layer-Induced Early Fracture in Graphene-Nanosheets (GNSs)-Reinforced Copper-Matrix-Laminated Composites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 24
10.3390/ma15249070
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Volume Fraction of Reinforcement on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of In Situ (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb Composites with Tailored Three-Dimensional Network Architecture

by
Ningbo Zhang
1,2,†,
Boyu Ju
2,*,†,
Taiqing Deng
1,
Sen Fu
3,
Cungao Duan
3,
Yiwei Song
4,
Yijun Jiang
4,
Qin Shen
4,
Caogen Yao
1,
Mingda Liu
5,
Ping Wu
6,7,*,
Ziyang Xiu
2,* and
Wenshu Yang
2,*
1
Aerospace Research Institute of Materials & Processing Technology, Beijing 100076, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
3
Shanghai Radio Equipment Research Institute, Shanghai 200050, China
4
Shanghai Research Institute of Radio Equipment, Shanghai 200090, China
5
CASIC Space Engineering Development Co., Ltd., Xinzhou 431400, China
6
Key Laboratory of Advanced Science and Technology on High Power Microwave, Xi’an 710024, China
7
Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi’an 710024, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Materials 2022, 15(24), 9070; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15249070
Submission received: 28 November 2022 / Revised: 16 December 2022 / Accepted: 16 December 2022 / Published: 19 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Study on Advanced Metal Matrix Composites)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The mechanical properties of (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites were expected to improve further by utilizing spark plasma sintering (SPS) and inducing the novel three-dimensional network architecture. In this study, (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites with the novel architecture were successfully fabricated by ball milling the LaB6 and Ti2AlNb mixed powders and subsequent SPS consolidation. The influence of the (Ti, Nb)B content on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the composites was revealed by using the scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and electronic universal testing machine. The microstructural characterization demonstrated that the boride crystallized into a B27 structure and the α2-precipitated amount increased with the (Ti, Nb)B increasing. When the (Ti, Nb)B content reached 4.9 vol%, both the α2 and reinforcement exhibited a continuous distribution along the prior particle boundaries (PPBs). The tensile test displayed that the tensile strength of the composites presented an increasing trend with the increasing (Ti, Nb)B content followed by a decreasing trend. The composite with a 3.2 vol% reinforcement had the optimal mechanical properties; the yield strengths of the composite at 25 and 650 °C were 998.3 and 774.9 MPa, showing an 11.8% and 9.2% improvement when compared with the Ti2AlNb-based alloy. Overall, (Ti, Nb)B possessed an excellent strengthening effect and inhibited the strength weakening of the PPBs area at high temperatures; the reinforcement content mainly affected the mechanical properties of the (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites by altering the α2-precipitated amount and the morphology of (Ti, Nb)B in the PPBs area. Both the continuous precipitation of the brittle α2 phase and the agglomeration of the (Ti, Nb)B reinforcement dramatically deteriorated the mechanical properties.

1. Introduction

The development of the aerospace industry has placed higher demands on material performance; typically, aerospace engines require a new structural material with greater specific stiffness, specific strength and service temperature [1,2,3]. Ti2AlNb alloys, after three decades of development, have emerged as the most promising lightweight structural material serviced at elevated temperature and are predicted to be an alternative to the high-density Inconel 718 superalloy. Although this superalloy possesses higher specific strength than nickel-based superalloys, better plasticity and processability than other Ti-Al alloys (Ti3Al and TiAl), and superior high-temperature mechanical properties than Ti-based alloys, it is still difficult to completely replace the Inconel 718 superalloy with the Ti2AlNb alloys due to insufficient strength and creep resistance at elevated temperatures [4,5,6,7,8]. Thus, improving the mechanical properties of the Ti2AlNb alloy becomes an urgent problem to satisfy its application in engineering.
The addition of ceramic particles, short fiber and whisker into the soft matrix via a specific preparation procedure is an effective method for improving the mechanical properties of Ti2AlNb alloys. By the strengthening effect of these stiff reinforcements (such as Ag [9], graphene [10,11], TiC [12,13,14], TiB [15,16,17], etc.), the mechanical [7,8], wear [11], fatigue [4,18] and creep [8] properties of Ti2AlNb alloys can be significantly improved without sacrificing or with slight degrading of other properties. Among these reinforcements, boride is the appropriate reinforcement for the Ti2AlNb matrix because of its exceptional physical and chemical compatibility with Ti2AlNb alloys [8,19]. Emura [7,8] fabricated a 6.5 wt% TiB/Ti-22Al-27Nb composite by hot isostatic pressing (HIP) and subsequent hot rolling using TiB-containing pre-alloyed powder; the fine boride (with a length of less than 5 μm and a width of less than 1 μm) in the composite exhibited an oriented alignment along the rolling direction. The subsequent tensile test revealed that the composite presented an increased strength and elastic modulus along the rolling direction and the TiB addition retarded the strength degradation of the matrix at high temperatures. Cowen et al. [15,20] synthesized a Ti2AlNb composite in which the boride presented a length of 158 μm and a width of 22 μm by HIP using the Ti-22Al-26Nb-5B powder as a raw material; the mechanical tests demonstrated that the boride incorporation deteriorated both the tensile and creep properties of the Ti2AlNb matrix alloy at 650 °C. By analyzing the fracture surface, the authors concluded that the excessively coarse reinforcement is one of the reasons for the poor mechanical properties.
As a fast and efficient sintering method, SPS has been widely adopted in the fabrication of metal-matrix composites. The process is based on a modified hot-pressing process in which the pulsed current passes directly through the pressing die and powder instead of an external heater, and fast heating and short process cycles are achieved by means of pulsed currents and the so-called “spark plasma effect” [21]. SPS, when compared to other traditional sintering procedures (such as hot-pressing sintering and hot-isostatic-pressing sintering), shortens the soaking time and lowers the sintering temperature, resulting in a finer microstructure and excellent comprehensive mechanical properties for the composite. Using Ti6Al4V micro-powder, B4C and B nanopowders, Huang et al. [22,23] fabricated Ti-based composites reinforced by TiC nano-particles and TiB nano-whiskers, in which the reinforcement presented a novel three-dimensional network architecture (3DNA); the subsequent tensile test exhibited that the composites with the nano-scale reinforcements and the novel architecture possessed a significant enhancement in both plasticity and strength compared to the composites with the micro-scale reinforcement and homogeneous distribution. Moreover, Zhang et al. [24] synthesized a TiB/Ti2AlNb composite with 3DNA by ball milling and subsequent SPS and found that (Ti, Nb)B exhibited good strengthening effects and that the 1.6 vol% TiB addition increased the yield strength of the Ti2AlNb matrix by 8.0% at room temperature.
The volume fraction of the boride reinforcement is a key parameter affecting the microstructure and properties of the Ti-based and Ti2AlNb-based composites. It was found that the incorporation of the boride hinders the migration of the β/B2 grain boundary during consolidation, heat treatment and sintering processes, and as a result, the microstructure of the matrix was refined [4,25]. Emura et al. [4] demonstrated that the prior B2 grain size of the Ti-22Al-27Nb alloy was reduced from 160 to 5 μm by the 6.5 wt% TiB addition. The addition of reinforcements also influenced the precipitation behavior of the Ti2AlNb matrix. Tang [19] and Hagiwara et al. [25] found that the introduction of the TiB reinforcement promoted the precipitation of the α2 phase. Cowen et al. [20] displayed that the addition of 2.0 vol% TiNbB2 increased the precipitated amount of the α2 phase in the Ti-22Al-26Nb alloy from the original 6 vol% to 20 vol%. The volume fraction of the boride reinforcement could also alter the mechanical properties of these composites. Generally, the volume fraction of reinforcement in composites possesses a critical value: when the reinforcement content is lower than this critical value, the tensile strength of the composites increases with the increase of reinforcement content, while when the volume fraction of the reinforcing phase is higher than this value, the mechanical properties of the composites deteriorate gradually [26,27,28].
Based on the above analysis, it is clear that the volume fraction of the reinforcement is indeed closely related to the microstructure and mechanical properties of the in situ boride-reinforced Ti2AlNb composites with the novel 3DNA. Unfortunately, the effect of the volume fraction of boride on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the composite has not been revealed since the boride contents are fixed in the previous research (typically, 6.5 wt% [7,8], 1.6 vol% [24] and 5.5 wt% [15,20]). Moreover, though having higher plasticity than the TiAl and Ti3Al alloys, the Ti2AlNb alloys are still intrinsically brittle materials, and thus, the additional amount of boride should be limited to a specified range to avoid the premature failure of the boride-reinforced Ti2AlNb composite. In view of this, in this study, the (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composite with 3DNA was successfully synthesized by ball milling and subsequent SPS, and the effect of the volume fraction of reinforcement on the microstructure and mechanical properties of in situ network-strengthened (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites was revealed.

2. Materials and Experimental Methods

2.1. Fabrication of (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb Composites

The following is a detailed description of the powder metallurgy process used to prepare the (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites. First, the spherical Ti2AlNb powder, fabricated by the plasma rotating electrode process, and the mechanically crushed LaB6 powder were mixed for 8 h at 250 rpm using a QM-3SP2 planetary ball mill with a ball-to-weight ratio of 5:1. The Ti2AlNb particles (shown in Figure 1a) are spherical in shape with a bimodal diameter distribution, concentrated between 65.0–124.2 μm. The LaB6 particles (as depicted in Figure 1b) are irregular polygons with an average particle size of about 920 nm.
After ball milling, the surface of the Ti2AlNb powder was inset with the irregular LaB6, and the diffraction peaks of the LaB6 and B2 phases emerged in the XRD pattern of the mixed powder, as shown in Figure 2. The mixed powder was stacked into high-density graphite die with an internal diameter of 50 mm, and then was SPS-consolidated by an FCT HPD-250 furnace under a vacuum environment (the pressure inside the furnace was less than 8Pa throughout the entire sintering process). The sintering temperature, axial pressure and soaking time were fixed at 1250 °C, 45 MPa and 20 min, respectively. The (Ti, Nb)B short fiber reinforcement was synthesized by the chemical reaction between the LaB6 and Ti2AlNb powders during the sintering process. After sintering, the sintered composites were cooled in the furnace to room temperature.
Due to the limited solid solubility of boron in the Ti2AlNb matrix, it is possible to assess the volume fraction of (Ti, Nb)B reinforcement V(Ti, Nb)B using the following formula:
V ( Ti ,   Nb ) B = 6 ω LaB 6 M ( Ti ,   Nb ) B M LaB 6 ρ ( Ti ,   Nb ) B 1 - ω LaB 6 ρ Ti 2 AlNb + 6 ω LaB 6 M ( Ti ,   Nb ) B M LaB 6 ρ ( Ti ,   Nb ) B × 100 %
where ρ and M stand for density and molar mass, respectively. ω LaB 6 denotes the mass fraction of the LaB6 powder in the mixed powders. According to the crystal structure and composition of the (Ti, Nb)B-phase displayed in Table 1, the molar mass and density of (Ti, Nb)B could be calculated as 81.2 g/mol and 6.08 g/cm3, respectively.
By adjusting the LaB6 percentage in the mixed powders, four batches of the (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites with various reinforcement volume fractions were synthesized. For these four composites, the additive amounts of LaB6 were 0, 0.8, 1.6 and 2.4%, and correspondingly, the volume fractions of the (Ti, Nb)B reinforcement were 0, 1.6, 3.2 and 4.9 vol% according to Equation (1).

2.2. Material Characterization

A SUPRA55 scanning electron microscope (Berlin, Germany) equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) was used to characterize the microstructure and composition of the characteristic regions of fabricated composites. The samples utilized for the SEM analysis were polished and etched by Kroll’s solution (80 vol% H2O + 10 vol% HNO3 + 10 vol% HF). For the SEM images captured with a secondary electronic mode, the matrix phases can be distinguished by contrast, and normally, the light, gray and dark areas in the matrix are B2, O and α2 phases, respectively [29].
Talos F200X transmission electron microscopy (Hillsboro, America) was employed to analyze the local microstructure and phase structure. The foils used for the TEM analysis were ground to a thickness of 40 μm before being ion milled at 5 eV using the GATAN-695 Ion Beam Thinner. The crystal structure of a specific area is obtained by the index of the diffraction pattern, which was acquired by selected area electron diffraction (SEAD) or by the fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy image. The FFT process was conducted by using Digital Micrograph software, and the crystal structure and detailed lattice parameters for the possible phases are listed in Table 1.
Table
Table 1. Crystal structure and ideal composition of the main phases in (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites [30,31].
Table 1. Crystal structure and ideal composition of the main phases in (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites [30,31].
PhaseSpace GroupComposition
(at%)		Lattice Parameters (Å)
abc
B2 P m 3 - m (221)(Ti, Al, Nb) solid solution3.233.233.23
α2P63/mmc (194)Ti3Al5.745.744.64
OCmcm (63)Ti2AlNb6.059.514.67
B27-(Ti, Nb)BPnma (62)TiNbB26.163.104.65
La2O3 P 3 - m 1 (164)La2O33.943.946.13
The mechanical properties of the (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites with various reinforcement volume fractions were evaluated by an INSTRON-8862 electronic universal testing machine (Boston, America) with a fixed axial tensile speed of 0.2 mm/min. To lessen the influence of the initial surface micro-cracks, the dog-bone samples, with a gauge dimension of 12 × 3 × 2 mm3, were machined using electric discharge machining and then ground with 1000 grit sandpaper to minimize the effect of the original surface micro-cracks. For the 650 °C tensile tests, the samples were coated with a specific glass anti-oxidation coating to avoid the impact of high-temperature oxidation on the surface and were soaked at 650 °C for 6 min to ensure that the heart of the samples reached the test temperature. The samples were quenched into the water once the fracture occurred, and then the fracture surface was observed by SEM.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure of (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb Composites

As demonstrated in Figure 3a, the microstructure of the fabricated composites can be divided into two different areas, namely the matrix area and the PPBs area. The (Ti, Nb)B crystallizes into a short fiber morphology and gathers in the PPBs area. The fine LaB6 powder is embedded into the surface of the Ti2AlNb powder for the mixed powder (see Figure 2), and the (Ti, Nb)B is synthesized by the chemical reaction between LaB6 and Ti2AlNb, both of which results in the network distribution of (Ti, Nb)B reinforcement. The matrix area is mainly composed of B2 and O phases and a feature of the alternate distribution of lamellar B2 and O phases, as shown in Figure 4a. The α2-Ti3Al, B2 solid solution and O-Ti2AlNb are the main phases for Ti2AlNb alloys [5]. The rapid cooling feature of SPS seems to inhibit the precipitation of α2, and instead, abundant lamellar O phase (gray area) precipitates from the B2 grain, as demonstrated in Figure 3b.
The bright-field image and diffraction patterns of the PPBs area, depicted in Figure 4b,c, suggest that (Ti, Nb)B crystallizes into a B27 crystal structure and that the by-product La2O3 and brittle α2 phase also emerges in the PPBs area. The α2-phase precipitates cling to the (100) surface of the (Ti, Nb)B phase, which implies that the synthesized (Ti, Nb)B promotes the precipitation of the α2 phase. For the in situ boride-strengthened Ti-based and TiAl-based composites, the borides usually possess B27 and Bf structures [32,33,34]. It is the same result as Cowen’s that the boride only possesses the B27 crystal structure in the in situ boride-reinforced Ti2AlNb-based composites. Zhang et al. [24,35] have demonstrated that the boride with the B27 structure has higher chemical stability compared to that with the Bf structure in Ti2AlNb-based composites. As displayed in Figure 3b and Figure 4a, the B27-(Ti, Nb)B reinforcement is imperceptible in the matrix area. For the composite with 3.6 vol% (Ti, Nb)B, the mean length and width of the boride are 13.8 and 1.9 μm, which is lower than those of the composite fabricated by the HIP (the mean length and width of the boride of the HIP composite are 158 and 22 μm, respectively [20]). Previous research has demonstrated that the SPS possesses the features of fast heating, fast cooling and fast sintering [11,36]. These features significantly refined the dimension of (Ti, Nb)B reinforcement.
Figure 5 exhibits the microstructure of the (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites with different (Ti, Nb)B contents. For traditional boride-reinforced Ti-based or Ti2AlNb-based composites with a uniform reinforcement distribution, the synthesized boride has proved to be an effective refiner of the prior β/B2 grain of the matrix [19,25]. However, for the composite fabricated in this study, the reinforcement segregates at the PPBs area and presents a near-network distribution, and thus, cannot effectively refine the prior B2 grains inside its enclosed matrix area. Moreover, the (Ti, Nb)B volume fraction displays an upward trend, with the LaB6 content in the original mixed powder increasing. When the LaB6 additive amount reaches 2.4 wt%, the (Ti, Nb)B reinforcements lose their needle-like morphology and agglomerate in the PPBs area, and the agglomerate (Ti, Nb)B reinforcement is entirely surrounded by the continuous precipitation of the brittle α2 phase. According to the bright-field image and FFT pattern of the PPBs area, depicted in Figure 6, the (Ti, Nb)B reinforcement in the 4.9 vol% (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composite also possesses the B27 crystal structure; nonetheless, the (Ti, Nb)B grows inadequately during the sintering process, leading to the reduction in both width and length when compared with the boride synthesized in the 3.2 vol% (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composite (see Figure 4b,c). The local volume fraction of the (Ti, Nb)B reinforcement VL in the PPBs area can be estimated by:
V L = 4 3 π ( D m 2 ) 3 · V ( Ti ,   Nb ) B 4 3 π ( D m 2 ) 3 − 4 3 π ( D m − D r 2 ) 3 = D m 3 · V ( Ti ,   Nb ) B D m 3 − ( D m − D r ) 3
where Dm is the average size of the raw Ti2AlNb powder, Vc and Dr are the (Ti, Nb)B volume fraction and the length of (Ti. Nb)B reinforcement, respectively. The length of the (Ti, Nb)B is measured by SEM and the bright-field image of the PPBs area, and the average size of the Ti2AlNb powder is 92 μm. Thus, the local (Ti, Nb)B volume fraction can be evaluated, as shown in Table 2. Due to the insufficient length, the spatial span of (Ti, Nb)B in the 4.9 vol% composite is the smallest compared with other composites, resulting in the excessive local (Ti, Nb)B content (76.8 vol%).
In addition, according to Figure 5, it also can be found that the α2-precipitated amount in the matrix area increases with the increase of the (Ti, Nb)B content. The α2 precipitation can only be perceived in the PPBs area for the composites with 1.6 and 3.2 vol% (Ti, Nb)B, while, in the 4.9 vol% (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composite, the evident α2 precipitation can be observed in both the matrix and PPBs areas. Al has been proven to be one of the α2 stabilizing elements for Ti2AlNb-based alloys [6,37]. The chemical reaction between LaB6 and Ti2AlNb consumes the Ti and Nb element, causing the enrichment of the Al element in and around the PPBs area so that the α2 precipitation is promoted, especially in the PPBs area. Moreover, previous research has demonstrated that the (Ti, Nb)B maintains a coherent interface with the α2 precipitation and can act as an effective substrate in promoting the heterogeneous nucleation and preferred precipitation of the α2 phase [30]. The two reasons mentioned above account for the fact that the brittle α2 phase has a trend to precipitate preferentially in the PPBs area.

3.2. Mechanical Properties of (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb Composites

Figure 7 demonstrates the 25 and 650 °C tensile curves of the (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composite with various (Ti, Nb)B contents. The yield strength shows an upward trend with the (Ti, Nb)B volume fraction increasing, while the elongation exhibits an opposite trend. The 25 °C tensile curve of the composite with 4.9 vol% (Ti, Nb)B possesses no obvious plastic deformation stage, displaying brittle fracture characteristics, as shown in Figure 7a. The superabundant (Ti, Nb)B deteriorates the tensile strength of the (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composite caused by the premature fracture. When the environment temperature reaches 650°C, the yield strength of the composite is improved with the increasing of the (Ti, Nb)B content (see Figure 7b), which implies that the (Ti, Nb)B still exhibits an excellent strengthening effect at such an elevated temperature. In addition, with the test temperature rising, the tensile ductility of the (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composite with a 3.2 and 4.9 vol% (Ti, Nb)B addition has a significant improvement. Overall, the composite with the 3.2 vol% reinforcement has optimal mechanical properties. The yield strengths of the composite at 25 and 650 °C are 998.3 and 774.9 MPa, showing an 11.8% and 9.2% improvement when compared with the Ti2AlNb-based alloy.
Figure 8 sketches the fracture surfaces of the (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composite at 25 °C. As shown in Figure 8a, the fracture surface of the Ti2AlNb alloy exhibits a transgranular fracture feature, i.e., the crack mainly propagates along the interior of the particle. For the composites with a 1.6 and 3.2 vol% (Ti, Nb)B content, the crack propagates along both the PPBs area and the interior of the previous particles, and hence, the fracture surface of the two composites exhibits the mixed feature of transgranular and intergranular fracture. When (Ti, Nb)B reinforcement agglomerates are in the PPBs area, the fracture surface also presents an entirely transgranular fracture feature; however, the fracture surface is relatively flat compared to that of the Ti2AlNb alloy, as displayed in Figure 8d.
Figure 8e reveals that the intergranular fracture becomes dominant for the Ti2AlNb alloy when the environment temperature reaches 650 °C, which suggests that the grain boundary bonding strength of the alloy weakens and becomes the key factor determining the tensile strength. Compared with the Ti2AlNb alloy, the fracture surface of the (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites still presents the mixed fracture feature, though only a few areas present the intergranular fracture characteristics, as shown in Figure 8f–h. The (Ti, Nb)B penetrates the PPBs area and connects two adjacent B2 grains like a needle, which can effectively inhibit the weakening of the B2 grain boundary at high temperatures.

3.3. Relationship between Microstructure and Mechanical Properties

Based on the results and discussion above, we can infer that the LaB6 mainly affects the properties of (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites by altering the α2-precipitated amount and the morphology as well as the synthesized amount of (Ti, Nb)B in the PPBs area. For convenience, the effect of these two factors on the mechanical properties is discussed separately.

3.3.1. α2-Precipitated Amount

As shown in Figure 4c, the brittle α2 is prone to precipitate around (Ti, Nb)B. With the LaB6 addition increasing, the α2-precipitated amount in the PPBs area increases and the α2/(Ti, Nb)B interface becomes the domain matrix/(Ti, Nb)B interface. The interfacial bonding strength between the reinforcement and matrix is one of the key factors determining both the mechanical properties and fracture behaviors of composites, and generally, the prematurely interfacial debonding will emerge when the bonding strength is insufficient, leading to the low ductility of composites [38,39]. Previous results have revealed that the work of adhesion of α2/(Ti, Nb)B, O/(Ti, Nb)B and B2/(Ti, Nb)B are 6.41, 6.08 and 5.86 J/m2, respectively [30]. Thus, the difference in the bonding strength of the three interfaces is small, and the change in the reinforcement/matrix interfacial type caused by various LaB6 additions is not the reason for the difference in the mechanical properties of the composites.
The α2 phase possesses a close-packed hexagonal crystal structure (P63/mmc), while the structures of the O and B2 phases are cubic ( P m 3 - m ) and orthorhombic (Cmcm), respectively. Among the three phases, the α2 phase is generally considered as being a brittle phase since it has the least independent slip system and the worst plasticity [40,41]. When the environment reaches 650 °C, the independent slip system of brittle α2 is still less than five, which obviously does not meet the Von Mises plastic deformation criterion [42,43]. The O phase possesses improved ductility when compared to the α2 phase since the <2c+a> slip system can be activated due to the low critical shear stress for slip activation [37,44]. The elasticity moduli of O, B2, α2 and (Ti, Nb)B are 148.0 [45], 132.2 [30], 151.7 [46,47] and 453 GPa [30], respectively. The stiffness of the PPBs area, which is full of α2 and (Ti, Nb)B phases, is higher than the matrix area, resulting in the stress concentration of the PPBs area during the tensile process. The insufficient deformability of the α2 and (Ti, Nb)B-phase means the stress concentrated in the PPBs area cannot be dissipated by deformation, causing the composites to exhibit the feature of transgranular fracture in the fracture surface, as shown in Figure 8b,f. The higher LaB6 addition, the higher the local volume fraction of brittle α2 and (Ti, Nb)B in the PPBs area, the worse the deformability of the PPBs area, and the more obvious transgranular fracture characteristics in the fracture surface, as demonstrated in Figure 8.
Based on the above analysis, it can be inferred that the excessive precipitation of the brittle α2 phase arising from the promoting effects of the (Ti, Nb)B formation on the α2 precipitation is one of the main reasons for the premature failure of the PPBs area. To prove this speculation, heat treatments are used to inhibit superabundant precipitation of the α2 phase in the PPBs area. According to the basic theory of heat treatments, shortening the soaking time in the phase zone (where the α2 phase is located) is an effective method to avoid the α2 precipitation. Thus, the heat treatment process is set as follows: soaking at the B2 single-phase region (1100 °C) for 30 min followed by aging at the B2+O phase region (800 °C) for 600 min. After the heat treatment, the precipitation of the α2 phase is totally inhibited, especially in the PPBs area, as shown in Figure 9a. Figure 9b reveals the tensile curves of the as-heat-treatment composite with 3.2 vol% (Ti, Nb)B contents; by comparison, it can be found that both the ductility and tensile strength are improved with the refrain of the precipitation of brittle α2 in the PPBs area.
The results and analyses mentioned above prove the fact well that the LaB6 addition can affect the mechanical properties and fracture behavior of composites by changing the precipitate amount of the brittle α2 phase in the PPBs area. The excessive precipitation of the α2 phase leads to the premature fracture of the PPBs area and significantly deteriorates the mechanical properties of the (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites both at room and high temperatures.

3.3.2. (Ti, Nb)B Morphology and Synthesized Amount

The main mechanisms by which short fiber reinforcement improves the strength of discontinuously reinforced composites, according to the strengthening theory, are dislocation strengthening and load-bearing strengthening [48,49]. As shown in Figure 5, the volume fraction of the (Ti, Nb)B reinforcement in the composite increases gradually as the LaB6 content increases. As shown in Figure 7, the strength of the (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composite increases with increasing (Ti, Nb)B volume fraction when the LaB6 content is less than 1.6 wt%. This result is consistent with the results of the aforementioned study on Ti-based composites, where the higher the volume fraction of the reinforcement, the greater the strengthening effect [50,51]. Cowen et al. [20] fabricated the TiB/Ti2AlNb composite with a uniform reinforcement distribution and found that the 5.6 vol% TiB addition obviously degraded the mechanical properties of the composite whose fracture surface displayed a completely brittle feature at both 25 and 650 °C. Based on Cowen’s results, it can be inferred that the 3.2 vol% (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composite ought to exhibit a wholly brittle feature on the fracture surface, given that the local volume fraction of the PPBs area is higher than 5.6 vol% (see Table 2). The tensile curves of the composite (as shown in Figure 7), however, exhibit a significant plastic deformation stage, indicating that tailoring reinforcements into a three-dimensional network distribution can improve the ductility of the composite when compared with the uniform distribution of reinforcement.
In fact, the (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites with this novel architecture are composed of the soft area (the matrix area) and the stiff area (reinforcement enriched area), as displayed in Figure 3. The appearance of the slip band indicates the activation of the slip system, and generally, the more pronounced the slip band is, the higher the plastic deformation capacity of the material [52,53]. As illustrated in Figure 10a, abundant slip bands emerge on the matrix area adjacent to the fracture surface, which suggests that the soft area provides a better deformation ability. In addition, the cracking of boride by effective load bearing can be perceived (see Figure 10b), indicating that the stiff area offers a superior strengthening effect [54]. As a result of the synergy of the stiff and soft areas, a composite with superior overall qualities can be obtained [55,56]. When the LaB6 addition reaches 2.4 wt%, the boride grows insufficiently and accumulates in the PPBs area (as illustrated in Figure 3), causing an inability of the deformation to be transmitted from one particle to another. As a result, stress is severely concentrated in the PPBs area, and the crack initiates in the junction area of two particles (i.e., the PPBs area), as shown in Figure 10c. Once a crack initiates, it can spread rapidly along the composite inside (see Figure 10d), leading to premature fracture (as presented in Figure 8d).
Altering the (Ti, Nb)B volume fraction and morphology is another approach for the LaB6 addition to affecting the mechanical properties and fracture behaviors of (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites. When (Ti, Nb)B growth is sufficient, the strength increases with increasing LaB6 content; while, when the LaB6 addition is sufficient to induce the (Ti, Nb)B agglomeration in the PPBs area, the mechanical properties of the composites deteriorate dramatically.

4. Conclusions

This study focuses on revealing the effect of the (Ti, Nb)B content on the microstructure and mechanical properties of in situ (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites with tailored three-dimensional network architecture. Several conclusions can be drawn as follows:
(1)
The (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites with tailored three-dimensional network architecture, in which the boride crystalized into a B27 crystal structure and gathered in the prior article boundaries (PPBs) area, was successfully fabricated by ball milling and subsequent spark plasma sintering.
(2)
The synthesized content of boride altered the α2-precipitated amount and the (Ti, Nb)B morphology. When the boride content reached a specific value, the (Ti, Nb)B reinforcement agglomerated in the PPBs area due to insufficient growth, and the brittle α2 phase precipitated continuously adjacent to the reinforcement.
(3)
When the (Ti, Nb)B content reached a reasonable range, the yield strength of the composites improved and the ductility exhibited an opposite trend with the increase in the volume fraction of reinforcement. The (Ti, Nb)B incorporation inhibited the strength weakening of the PPBs area at high temperatures, which significantly increased the strength of the composites.
(4)
By reducing the α2-precipitated content in the PPBs area and avoiding agglomeration of boride by increasing the (Ti, Nb)B growth length, these were both effective methods to improve the mechanical properties of the composite with a high volume fraction of reinforcement.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.X. and W.Y.; Data curation, N.Z. and B.J.; Funding acquisition, Z.X. and W.Y.; Formal analysis, T.D., C.Y. and S.F.; Investigation, S.F., M.L. and C.D.; Methodology, Y.S., M.L. and C.D.; Project administration, P.W., Y.J. and Z.X.; Resources, N.Z. and Q.S.; Supervision, P.W., T.D. and Y.J.; Validation, W.Y., Q.S. and C.Y.; Writing—original draft, N.Z. and W.Y.; Writing—review and editing, B.J., P.W., M.L., Q.S. and Z.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52171136, 51871072, 51871073), the Excellent Youth Scholars project of Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (YQ2021E016), and the Heilongjiang Touyan Team Program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gong, S.K.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Guo, X.P.; Lin, J.P.; Zhao, X.H. Application and Research of Typical Intermetallics-Based High Temperature Structural Materials in China. Acta Met. Sin 2019, 55, 1067–1076. [Google Scholar]
  2. Praveen, S.; Kim, H.S. High-Entropy Alloys: Potential Candidates for High-Temperature Applications—An Overview. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2018, 20, 1700645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Couret, A.; Voisin, T.; Thomas, M.; Monchoux, J.P. Development of a TiAl Alloy by Spark Plasma Sintering. JOM 2017, 69, 2576–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Emura, S.; Hagiwara, M.; Yang, S.J. Room-Temperature Tensile and High-Cycle-Fatigue Strength of Fine TiB Particulate-Reinforced Ti-22Al-27Nb Composites. Met. Mater Trans A 2004, 35, 2971–2979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Sha, A.; Li, X. Effect of Surface Integrity on Hot Fatigue Life of Ti2AlNb Intermetallic Alloy. Materials 2021, 14, 4841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, H.Y.; Yan, N.; Liang, H.Y.; Liu, Y.C. Phase Transformation and Microstructure Control of Ti2AlNb-Based Alloys: A Review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 80, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hagiwara, M.; Emura, S.; Araoka, A.; Kong, B.O.; Tang, F. Enhanced Mechanical Properties of Orthorhombic Ti2AlNb-Based Intermetallic Alloy. Met. Mater. Int. 2003, 9, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, S.J.; Emura, S.; Nam, S.W.; Hagiwara, M.; Jeon, H.S.; Yoon, S.B. Improvement of Creep Resistance in TiB Particle Reinforced Ti2AlNb Composite Particularly above 700 °C. Mater. Lett. 2004, 58, 3187–3191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, W.; Zhou, H.X.; Wang, Q.J.; Han, Z.R.; Wang, K.S. Preparation and Tribological Behavior of Ti2AlNb/Ag Self-Lubricating Composites. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2020, 29, 5959–5967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, W.; Han, Z.R.; Wang, Q.J.; Wei, B.J.; Wang, K.S. Influence of Heat Treatment on the Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Properties of Graphene/Ti2AlNb Composites Synthesized via Spark Plasma Sintering. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2020, 29, 7587–7597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, W.; Han, Z.R.; Wang, Q.J.; Wei, B.J.; Gao, Y. Tribological Properties of Ti2AlNb Matrix Composites Containing Few-Layer Graphene Fabricated by Spark Plasma Sintering. Metals 2020, 10, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, Y.R.; Cai, Q.; Liu, Y.C.; Ma, Z.Q.; Li, C.; Li, H.J. Evaluation of Precipitation Hardening in TiC-Reinforced Ti2AlNb-Based Alloys. Int. J. Min. Met. Mater. 2018, 25, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, Y.R.; Cai, Q.; Liu, Y.C.; Guo, Q.Y.; Li, H.J. Precipitation of Carbides and Dissolution of Widmanstätten Structure for Enhanced Hardness in Ti2AlNb-Based Alloys. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2019, 28, 1892–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Polozov, I.; Sufiiarov, V.; Starikov, K.; Popovich, A. In Situ Synthesized Ti2AlNb-Based Composites Produced by Selective Laser Melting by Addition of SiC-Whiskers. Mater. Lett. 2021, 297, 129956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Boehlert, C.J.; Sabirov, I.; Ruiz-Palenzuela, B.; Cornide, J.; Ruiz-Navas, E.M. A comparison of Field Assisted Hot Pressing and Hot Isostatic Pressing for Gas Atomized Ti-22Al-26Nb (at.%) and Ti-22Al-26Nb-5B (at.%) Powders. J. Alloy. Compd. 2021, 852, 156870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Emura, S.; Hagiwara, M. Effect of Heat Treatment on the Creep Properties of Ti-22Al-27Nb/TiB Composite. Key Eng. Mater. 2007, 345–346, 545–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, J.L.; Wang, G.F.; Jiao, X.Y.; Li, X.; Yang, C. Hot Deformation Behavior and Microstructural Evolution of Ti-22Al-25Nb-1.0B Alloy Prepared by Elemental Powder Metallurgy. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 695, 1038–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, S.J.; Emura, S.; Hagiwara, M.; Nam, S.W. The role of TiB Particulate Reinforcement in Ti2AlNb Based Composite Under High Cycle Fatigue. Scr. Mater. 2003, 49, 897–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tang, F.; Emura, S.; Hagiwara, M. Reinforcing Effect of in situ Grown TiB Fibers on Ti-22Al-11Nb-4Mo Alloy. Scr. Mater. 2000, 43, 573–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cowen, C.J.; Boehlert, C.J. Comparison of the Microstructure, Tensile, and Creep Behavior for Ti-22Al-26Nb (at. pct) and Ti-22Al-26Nb-5B (at. pct). Met. Mater. Trans. A 2007, 38, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Orrù, R.; Licheri, R.; Locci, A.M.; Cincotti, A.; Cao, G. Consolidation/Synthesis of Materials by Electric Current Activated/Assisted Sintering. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2009, 63, 127–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, L.Q.; Wang, L.H.; Qian, M.; Zou, J. High tensile-strength and ductile titanium matrix composites strengthened by TiB nanowires. Scr. Mater. 2017, 141, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, L.Q.; Huang, Q. High-Strength Ti–BN Composites with Core-Shell Structured Matrix and Network-Woven Structured TiB Nanowires. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc 2022, 32, 1169–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, N.; Sun, D.; Han, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, H.; Wang, Z.; Yang, W.; Wu, G. Effect of Spark Plasma Sintering Temperatures on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of in-situ (La2O3+TiB)/Ti2AlNb Composites with a Tailored Three-Dimensional Network Architecture. Mater. Sci. Eng. A -Struct. 2020, 772, 138769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hagiwara, M.; Kitaura, T.; Ono, Y.; Yuri, T.; Ogata, T.; Emura, S. Tensile and High Cycle Fatigue Properties of a Minor Boron-Modified Ti-22Al-11Nb-2Mo-1Fe Alloy. Mater. Trans. 2012, 53, 1138–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, C.J.; Kong, F.T.; Xiao, S.L.; Zhao, E.T.; Xu, L.J.; Chen, Y.Y. Evolution of Microstructure and Tensile Properties of in situ Titanium Matrix Composites with Volume Fraction of (TiB+TiC) Reinforcements. Mater. Sci. Eng. A -Struct. 2012, 548, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, B.X.; Huang, L.J.; Geng, L.; Wang, B.; Cui, X.P. Effects of Reinforcement Volume Fraction on Tensile Behaviors of Laminated Ti–TiBw/Ti Composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A -Struct. 2014, 610, 344–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, M.; Lu, W.; Qin, J.; Ma, F.; Lu, J.; Zhang, D. Effect of Volume Fraction of Reinforcement on Room Temperature Tensile Property of in situ (TiB+TiC)/Ti Matrix Composites. Mater. Des. 2006, 27, 494–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Y.R.; Liu, Y.C.; Yu, L.M.; Liang, H.Y.; Huang, Y.; Ma, Z.Q. Microstructures and Tensile Properties of Ti2AlNb and Mo-Modified Ti2AlNb Alloys Fabricated by Hot Isostatic Pressing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A -Struct. 2020, 776, 139043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, N.B.; Han, X.L.; Sun, D.L.; Liu, H.; Xue, W.; Ju, B.Y.; Wu, G.H. Crystallographic Orientation Relationships and Interfacial Structures between Reinforcement and Matrix Phases in an in situ (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb Composite. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 542, 148592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gouteron, J.; Michel, D.; Lejus, A.M.; Zarembowitch, J. Raman Spectra of Lanthanide Sesquioxide Single Crystals: Correlation between A and B-Type Structures. J. Solid State Chem. 1981, 38, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cowen, C.J.; Boehlert, C.J. Microstructure, Tensile, and Creep Behavior of Boron-Modified Ti-15Al-33Nb (at.%). Met. Mater. Trans. A 2008, 39, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. De Graef, M.; Lofvander, J.P.A.; Mccullough, C.; Levi, C.G. The Evolution of Metastable Bf Borides in a Ti-Al-B Alloy. Acta Metall. Et Mater. 1992, 40, 3395–3406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ropars, L.; Dehmas, M.; Gourdet, S.; Delfosse, J.; Tricker, D.; Aeby-Gautier, E. Structure Evolutions in a Ti-6Al-4V Matrix Composite Reinforced with TiB, Characterised Using High Energy X-ray Diffraction. J. Alloy. Compd. 2015, 624, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, N.B.; Han, X.L.; Sun, D.L.; Liu, S.A.; Li, H.; Yang, W.S.; Wu, G.H. Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Properties of LaB6-Modified Ti2AlNb Alloy Fabricated by Blended Elemental Powder Metallurgy. Powder Technol. 2020, 369, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Trzaska, Z.; Couret, A.; Monchoux, J.P. Spark Plasma Sintering Mechanisms at the Necks between TiAl Powder Particles. Acta Mater. 2016, 118, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Banerjee, D. The intermetallic Ti2AlNb. Prog. Mater. Sci. 1997, 42, 135–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chawla, N.; Shen, Y.L. Mechanical Behavior of Particle Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2001, 3, 357–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Song, S.G.; Shi, N.; Gray, G.T.; Roberts, J.A. Reinforcement Shape Effects on the Fracture Behavior and Ductility of Particulate-Reinforced 6061-Al Matrix Composites. Met. Mater. Trans. A 1996, 27, 3739–3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Emura, S.; Araoka, A.; Hagiwara, M. B2 Grain Size Refinement and its Effect on Room Temperature Tensile Properties of a Ti-22Al-27Nb Orthorhombic Intermetallic Alloy. Scr. Mater. 2003, 48, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xue, C.; Zeng, W.D.; Xu, B.; Liang, X.B.; Zhang, J.W.; Li, S.Q. B2 Grain Growth and Particle Pinning Effect of Ti-22Al-25Nb Orthorhombic Intermetallic Alloy during Heating Process. Intermetallics 2012, 29, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Boehlert, C.J. Part III. The Tensile Behavior of Ti-Al-Nb O+Bcc Orthorhombic Alloys. Met. Mater. Trans. A 2001, 32, 1977–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nandy, T.K.; Banerjee, D. Creep of the Orthorhombic Phase Based on the Intermetallic Ti2AlNb. Intermetallics 2000, 8, 915–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Banerjee, D. Deformation of the O and α2 Phase in the Ti-Al-Nb System. Philos. Mag. A 1995, 72, 1559–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hu, K.M.; Huang, J.C.; Wei, Z.Y.; Peng, Q.; Xie, Z.Y.; Sa, B.S.; Wu, B. Elastic and Thermodynamic Properties of the Ti2AlNb Orthorhombic Phase from First-Principles Calculations. Phys. Status Solidi B 2017, 254, 1600634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wu, B.; Zinkevich, M.; Aldinger, F.; Chu, M.Y.; Shen, J.Y. Prediction of the Ordering Behaviours of the Orthorhombic Phase Based on Ti2AlNb Alloys by Combining Thermodynamic Model with ab Initio Calculation. Intermetallics 2008, 16, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zeng, X.S.; Peng, R.F.; Yu, Y.L.; Hu, Z.F.; Wen, Y.F.; Song, L. Pressure Effect on Elastic Constants and Related Properties of Ti3Al Intermetallic Compound: A First-Principles Study. Materials 2018, 11, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Zhang, Z.; Chen, D.L. Consideration of Orowan Strengthening Effect in Particulate-Reinforced Metal Matrix Nanocomposites: A Model for Predicting Their Yield Strength. Scr. Mater. 2006, 54, 1321–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hu, Y.; Cong, W.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Ning, F.; Wang, H. Laser Deposition-Additive Manufacturing of TiB-Ti Composites with Novel Three-Dimensional Quasi-Continuous Network Microstructure: Effects on Strengthening and Toughening. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 133, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cai, C.; He, S.; Li, L.F.; Teng, Q.; Song, B.; Yan, C.Z.; Wei, Q.S.; Shi, Y.S. In-situ TiB/Ti-6Al-4V Composites with a Tailored Architecture Produced by Hot Isostatic Pressing: Microstructure Evolution, Enhanced Tensile Properties and Strengthening Mechanisms. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 164, 546–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Feng, Y.Q.; Feng, K.; Yao, C.W.; Li, Z.G. Effect of LaB6 Addition on the Microstructure and Properties of (Ti3Al+TiB)/Ti Composites by Laser Cladding. Mater. Des. 2019, 181, 107959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Koko, A.; Elmukashfi, E.; Becker, T.H.; Karamched, P.S.; Wilkinson, A.J.; Marrow, T.J. In situ Characterisation of the Strain Fields of Intragranular Slip Bands in Ferrite by High-Resolution Electron Backscatter Diffraction. Acta Mater. 2022, 239, 118284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yang, Q.; Hu, Y.; Zuo, J.-M. The Dislocation Structure of Slip Bands in Deformed High Entropy Alloy Nanopillars. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 95, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ivasishin, O.M.; Markovsky, P.E.; Savvakin, D.G.; Stasiuk, O.O.; Rad, M.N.; Prikhodko, S.V. Multi-layered Structures of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy and TiC and TiB Composites on its Base Fabricated Using Blended Elemental Powder Metallurgy. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2019, 269, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huang, L.J.; Geng, L.; Peng, H.X. Microstructurally inhomogeneous composites: Is a homogeneous reinforcement distribution optimal? Prog. Mater Sci. 2015, 71, 93–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Huang, L.; An, Q.; Geng, L.; Wang, S.; Jiang, S.; Cui, X.; Zhang, R.; Sun, F.; Jiao, Y.; Chen, X.; et al. Multiscale Architecture and Superior High-Temperature Performance of Discontinuously Reinforced Titanium Matrix Composites. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2000688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 15 09070 g001 550
Figure 1. SEM morphology and particle size distribution of raw powders. (a) Ti2AlNb powder, (b) LaB6 powder.
Figure 1. SEM morphology and particle size distribution of raw powders. (a) Ti2AlNb powder, (b) LaB6 powder.
Materials 15 09070 g001
Materials 15 09070 g002 550
Figure 2. Characterization of Ti2AlNb and LaB6 mixed powders. (a) SEM image and corresponding EDS results, (b) XRD patterns.
Figure 2. Characterization of Ti2AlNb and LaB6 mixed powders. (a) SEM image and corresponding EDS results, (b) XRD patterns.
Materials 15 09070 g002
Materials 15 09070 g003 550
Figure 3. Typical microstructure of (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites: (a) whole morphology, (b) matrix area, (c) PPBs area.
Figure 3. Typical microstructure of (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites: (a) whole morphology, (b) matrix area, (c) PPBs area.
Materials 15 09070 g003
Materials 15 09070 g004 550
Figure 4. Bright-field image and corresponding SEAD/FFT patterns of 1.6 vol% (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composite: (a) matrix area, (b,c) PPBs area.
Figure 4. Bright-field image and corresponding SEAD/FFT patterns of 1.6 vol% (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composite: (a) matrix area, (b,c) PPBs area.
Materials 15 09070 g004
Materials 15 09070 g005 550
Figure 5. Microstructure of (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites with different (Ti, Nb)B contents (the red box exhibit the microstructure of PPBs area). (a) 0 vol%, (b) 1.6 vol%, (c) 3.2 vol%, (d) 4.9 vol%.
Figure 5. Microstructure of (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites with different (Ti, Nb)B contents (the red box exhibit the microstructure of PPBs area). (a) 0 vol%, (b) 1.6 vol%, (c) 3.2 vol%, (d) 4.9 vol%.
Materials 15 09070 g005
Materials 15 09070 g006 550
Figure 6. Bright-field image and corresponding FFT pattern of PPBs area in 4.9 vol% (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composite.
Figure 6. Bright-field image and corresponding FFT pattern of PPBs area in 4.9 vol% (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composite.
Materials 15 09070 g006
Materials 15 09070 g007 550
Figure 7. Tensile curves of (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites with different (Ti, Nb)B contents at different temperatures. (a) 25 °C, (b) 650 °C.
Figure 7. Tensile curves of (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composites with different (Ti, Nb)B contents at different temperatures. (a) 25 °C, (b) 650 °C.
Materials 15 09070 g007
Materials 15 09070 g008 550
Figure 8. Fracture morphology of composites with various (Ti, Nb)B contents at different temperatures. (a–d) 25 °C, (e–h) 650°C.
Figure 8. Fracture morphology of composites with various (Ti, Nb)B contents at different temperatures. (a–d) 25 °C, (e–h) 650°C.
Materials 15 09070 g008
Materials 15 09070 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) Microstructure and (b) tensile curves of 3.2 vol% (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composite after heat treatment.
Figure 9. (a) Microstructure and (b) tensile curves of 3.2 vol% (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb composite after heat treatment.
Materials 15 09070 g009
Materials 15 09070 g010 550
Figure 10. Morphology of the area adjacent to the fracture surface cracked at 25 °C. (a,b) 3.2 vol% composite, (c,d) 4.9 vol% composite.
Figure 10. Morphology of the area adjacent to the fracture surface cracked at 25 °C. (a,b) 3.2 vol% composite, (c,d) 4.9 vol% composite.
Materials 15 09070 g010
Table
Table 2. Local (Ti, Nb)B volume fraction in PPBs area for composites with different (Ti, Nb)B contents.
Table 2. Local (Ti, Nb)B volume fraction in PPBs area for composites with different (Ti, Nb)B contents.
V(Ti,Nb)B (vol%)Dm (μm)Dr (μm)VL (vol%)
0.092.0——
1.615.53.8
3.213.88.3
4.92.076.8
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, N.; Ju, B.; Deng, T.; Fu, S.; Duan, C.; Song, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Shen, Q.; Yao, C.; Liu, M.; et al. Effect of Volume Fraction of Reinforcement on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of In Situ (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb Composites with Tailored Three-Dimensional Network Architecture. Materials 2022, 15, 9070. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15249070

AMA Style

Zhang N, Ju B, Deng T, Fu S, Duan C, Song Y, Jiang Y, Shen Q, Yao C, Liu M, et al. Effect of Volume Fraction of Reinforcement on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of In Situ (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb Composites with Tailored Three-Dimensional Network Architecture. Materials. 2022; 15(24):9070. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15249070

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Ningbo, Boyu Ju, Taiqing Deng, Sen Fu, Cungao Duan, Yiwei Song, Yijun Jiang, Qin Shen, Caogen Yao, Mingda Liu, and et al. 2022. "Effect of Volume Fraction of Reinforcement on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of In Situ (Ti, Nb)B/Ti2AlNb Composites with Tailored Three-Dimensional Network Architecture" Materials 15, no. 24: 9070. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15249070

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop