Next Article in Journal
Triboelectric Energy-Harvesting Floor Tile
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimal Stopping Rules for Preventing Overloading of Multicomponent Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamics and Application of Modern, Smart, and Active Elements or Structures
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Dual-Input Neural Network for Online State-of-Charge Estimation of the Lithium-Ion Battery throughout Its Lifetime
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Simulation of Far-Field Light Distribution of Micro-LED Based on Its Structural Parameters

1
School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng 224051, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Artificial Microstructure and Mesoscopic Physics, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(24), 8854; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248854
Submission received: 20 October 2022 / Revised: 2 December 2022 / Accepted: 7 December 2022 / Published: 12 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reliability Modeling of Complex Systems in Materials and Devices)

Abstract

:
To clarify how micro-LED far-field light distributions differ from Lambertian distributions owing to small-sized-structure effects, the light distribution of a micro-LED was simulated via the ray-tracing method in this study. Specifically, considering material absorption, far-field light distribution, and light-output efficiency, we studied micro-LEDs as a function of size. We found that the light distribution is the most uniform and the efficiency is the highest when the size is the smallest under certain conditions. Under other conditions, with increasing sapphire size, the luminous efficiency first increases and then decreases. The luminous efficiency is the highest when the thickness is 30 µm. Under certain other conditions, as the diameter of the micro-sphere structure on the sapphire increases, the luminous efficiency first increases and then decreases.

1. Introduction

Micro-LEDs (LEDs with sizes <100 µm [1]) are used in self-emitting displays, especially micro-projection displays. The contrast, efficiency, resolution, and response time of a micro-LED are typically high, and micro-LED displays outperform LCD and OLED displays in terms of brightness, resolution, contrast, energy consumption, service life, response speed, and thermal stability [2]. There is a surging demand for micro-LED display panels for smartwatches, phones, TVs, laptops, and augmented/virtual reality devices [3,4]. Nevertheless, such displays still face technical challenges, and some key technologies and process equipment have not yet been fully developed.
A traditional LED is a Lambertian light source with an uneven light intensity spatial distribution and a large light beam divergence angle [5]. The chip size of mini-LEDs ranges from 100 to 200 μm [3]. Mini-LEDs are thick; consequently, the Lambertian distribution leads to a small field of view, a lack of light uniformity, and other problems [6]. To overcome these problems, one solution is to increase the optical distance between the mini-LED backplane and the diffuser plate while keeping the array arrangement fixed [7]. Another is to compensate for the optical distance by using more mini-LEDs [8]. A third solution is local dimming with an integrated light-guiding plate [9].
LCDs and OLEDs perform comparably in terms of color gamut [10,11], resolution, response time [12], and power consumption. However, LCD displays have very limited viewing angles, which is a significant problem because they operate by blocking light and have intrinsic viewing obstacles at certain angles. When the angle is even slightly excessive, it is impossible to see the original color (or sometimes anything at all). Solutions to this problem include novel polarization converters based on reflective metal gratings and polarized beam separators [13] and the use of a unique roll-to-roll large-scale high-transmission wide-angle diffuser film [14]. An LCD also has a backlight layer; therefore, light can easily leak from the gap between the screen and the border [15].
A micro-LED exhibits none of these disadvantages. It has fields of view on both the side and front, although the side field of view is limited to a particular angle. There are ways of improving the light extraction efficiency of small-angle micro-LEDs [16,17,18], but when a micro-LED is viewed from a low angle on the side, an optimal view may not be possible. Researchers have presented calculations without considering the absorption exhibited by the micro-LED material. However, those calculations may deviate from experimental data because they do not consider the absorption. In this study, we use the uniform light distribution of micro-LEDs to increase the field of view by performing calculations considering the material absorption.

2. Design Concept

The far-field light distribution of most modern LED chips is a Lambertian distribution. This distribution causes approximately 80% of the light to fall within 120° because the cell size is so large and most light is totally reflected by the top and bottom sides. The optical intensity I is highest when the angle θ measured from the normal is close to 0° and decreases as θ approaches 90° [19,20]:
I = I0 cos θ (−π/2 ≤ θ ≤ π/2)
where I0 is the maximum intensity.
Existing LED-chip (or lamp-bead) composite Lambertian distributions cannot meet the requirements of display mixing: intense light, a small middle-edge light intensity, and an effective intensity that is concentrated within a 120° angle. To utilize the three primary colors, mixed light requires a certain distance; an insufficient distance affects the user experience, including in the case of TV screens. The current solution is to use a mixed lens; however, the lens itself also occupies space, so the thickness reduction is limited. The light distribution from an LED chip (or bead) in a display screen should be highly uniform to make it easier to realize an ultra-thin screen and thereby improve the user experience.
To date, there are only two ways to paint black light-absorbing material on the display screen: on the bottom surface between pixels to reduce the reflection of external incident light from the bottom surface and improve the contrast, or on the sides of the pixels themselves. For a modern display with a large proportion of chips or beads, the sides of each pixel must be coated to absorb light from a small angle to prevent crosstalk between adjacent pixels. These methods reduce the LED’s luminous efficiency. As the size and height of LED chips or micro-beads decrease, larger light angles and more uniform light distributions are obtained. To obtain a better light angle and a highly uniform light distribution, it is necessary to simulate the optical properties of micro-LEDs.
Micro-LED chips produce a more even distribution; developing highly homogeneous micro-LED optical-design technology is therefore an urgent scientific and technological challenge. Direct measurements have shown that the secondary light distribution curve of micro-LEDs is non-Lambertian [1,2,5]. Bayneva [21] simulated the light distribution using Tracepro. They applied the ray-tracing method in the early stages and found that as the size of the micro-LED decreased, the micro-LED far-field light distribution stopped following a Lambertian distribution [1,22].
Changing the chip structure can affect the light distribution of the chip; simulation results showed that when the size was reduced to 10 μm, the far-field optical distribution differed significantly from a Lambertian distribution, and its far-field distribution was more uniform. An experimental study by Xu et al. [23] further supported the simulation results [24].
The aforementioned studies have shown that the far-field light distribution of the vertical structure differs from a Lambertian distribution, indicating that the light distribution of the LED can be improved through the design of an appropriate chip structure.
Furthermore, the existing research focuses on the influence of different micro-LED chip sizes on the far-field light distribution and output efficiency of micro-LEDs. At present, the absorption of materials and the influence of microstructure on the far-field light distribution and light output efficiency of LEDs are rarely considered.
Keeping the layer thickness of different materials constant, the chip size of the micro-LED cell was changed from 10 µm to 20, 30, 40, and 50 µm; the refractive and absorption indices of the different materials are listed in Table 1. The geometric optics simulation calculation adopted in this study does not consider diffraction and interference, which cause great light-field redistribution due to size change. Therefore, regardless of the material used, the refractive and absorption indices of the materials did not change according to micro-LED size. The refractive index of (Al2O3)2 (1.7) was the lowest among all materials; that of the active layer (2.54) was the highest. ITO had an absorption index of 0 mm−1; the highest absorption index (25 mm−1) was that of the active layer [24,25,26]. The wavelength simulated and calculated in this paper is 450 nm.
In this study, based on the ray-tracing method, the Monte Carlo method was used to simulate the calculation, and Tracepro 7 software was used to simulate the calculation. The calculation principle is based on geometric optics, specifically considering the reflection and refraction laws of light at the interface. Wave optics, diffraction, and interference are not considered, so the diffraction effect is not considered. The active layer is assumed to be a quantum well layer, and it is assumed that the light emitted from the surface of the well layer at this time is uniformly distributed. According to these assumptions, the ordinary LED distribution we obtained is a Lambert distribution, which is in good agreement with the experimental data. This study employed a 3D simulation. The 0°-direction of the far-field light distribution provided the vertical direction, and the 0° direction in Figure 1 was increased. Keeping the layer thickness of different materials constant, the semi-sphere micro-structure size of the Al2O3 film was changed from 1 µm to 2, 3, and 4 µm, respectively, and the refractive and absorption indices of the different materials are listed in Table 2.
Keeping the layer thickness of different materials constant, the Al2O3 film size was changed from 10 µm to 30 and 50 µm, respectively. The refractive and absorption indices of the different materials are listed in Table 3. The device structure size was designed according to the sizes mentioned in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3.

3. Results and Analysis

The relationship between the light distribution and light-output efficiency of a micro-LED cell with a constant Al2O3 film thickness when changing the size of the micro-LED cell is shown in Figure 2, where the light efficiency is represented by the area enclosed by the curve. In the simulation, we changed the chip size from 10 µm to 20, 30, 40, and 50 µm. The overall pattern exhibited four lobes. The luminous efficiency and light distribution were approximately the same at 0° and 180°. When the micro-LED cell size was smaller (when the cell size was 30 µm, which is larger than 20 µm, and the semi-sphere micro-structure was different), the total enclosed area (and thus the light efficiency) was larger (Table 4).
The maximum light intensity was 0.653 at a size of 10 µm. On any single side of the micro-LED cell, the reflective intensity was highest at the center. As can be observed from the figure, the far-field light distribution of the micro-LED shows that the light output in the middle is small, and the light output on both sides is large. This is because as the size of the micro-LED decreases, the area of the front decreases, the light output of the front decreases, and the ratio of the area of the side to the area of the front increases. Most of the light comes out of the side; thus, the light on the side increases. Similar results were obtained by Korean researchers; however, they did not consider the material absorption [5].
The relationship between the light distribution and light-output efficiency of a micro-LED cell with the same size as the semi-sphere micro-structure on the Al2O3 film was also examined. In the simulation (Figure 3), we changed the diameter of the semi-sphere micro-structure on the Al2O3 film from 1 µm to 2, 3, and 4 µm. When the diameter was 1 µm, among the light efficiencies of the 10-, 30-, and 50-µm Al2O3 films, that of the 30-µm film was the largest (Table 5, Figure 3). On any single side of the micro-LED cell, the reflective intensity was highest at the center.
The real efficiencies of the 10-, 30-, and 50-µm Al2O3 films were 0.6444, 0.64429, and 0.644438, respectively, as listed in the bottom right corner of Table 6. It is worth noting that, because of the relationship between significant figures, the first three decimal digits are the same (as listed in Table 6), despite the actual values being slightly different. Figure 4 and Figure 5 show that the luminous efficiency of the micro-LED increases with the sapphire layer thickness. This is because with increasing sapphire size, the angle from the light emitted from the micro-LED active layer to the front light-emitting surface becomes progressively smaller, which prevents the front light from being reflected back by the total reflection. However, as the size continues to increase, the material absorbs more light, and the efficiency of the front light emittance decreases. Further, with increasing sapphire size, the light from the active layer of the micro-LED shines increasingly more on the side, resulting in more side light. Thus, the sidelight efficiency also increases. However, with a further increase in size, the material absorbs more light, and the sidelight efficiency is reduced. Finally, it is concluded that the luminous efficiency of the micro-LED is highest when the thickness of the sapphire is 30 µm (Table 6, Figure 4 and Figure 5).
The possible reasons for these results are as follows: When the chip thickness is small, the structure change plays a major role in the light output efficiency. At this time, the light output efficiency is generally high. As the thickness increases, the material’s light absorption increases, which leads to a decline in efficiency. When the thickness is 30 µm, the two effects cancel each other out, so the light output efficiency of the micro-LED chip is at its maximum.

4. Conclusions

In this study, considering material absorption, far-field light distribution, and light-output efficiency, we investigated micro-LEDs as a function of size. We found that the light distribution is mostly uniform, and the efficiency is highest when the size is smallest. Under other conditions, with increasing sapphire size, the luminous efficiency first increases and then decreases. When the thickness is 30 µm, the luminous efficiency is the highest (0.656). Under other conditions, as the diameter of the micro-sphere structure on the sapphire increases, the luminous efficiency first increases and then decreases. In addition, the far-field light distribution of the micro-LED does not follow a Lambertian distribution (the Lambertian distribution light beam is 120°), and its light beam angle is approximately 150°, which can meet the requirements of future displays.
In the future, micro-LED chips with appropriate chip sizes and structures will be able to provide the intense, uniform non-Lambertian light distribution required for display mixing. On the one hand, an ultra-thin screen can be achieved; on the other hand, the field of view can be increased. Using the data and findings of this study, more efficient LEDs could be fabricated and achieve better luminous effects, improving their applicability in the automotive, medical, and fiber-optic fields, among other fields.
Combined with the design idea presented in this paper, considering light absorption, a far-field light distribution and light-output efficiency that meet the display requirements can be achieved by optimizing the appropriate structural parameters of micro-LED devices, i.e., by improving the light energy utilization efficiency of micro-LEDs, realizing the wide-angle light emission of micro-LED displays, and upgrading the carbon neutralization technology of micro-LED displays.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.W.; Software, Z.C.; Formal analysis, Z.C.; Investigation, W.W.; Data curation, X.P.; Writing—original draft, W.W.; Writing—review & editing, Y.C., C.W., X.P., T.T. and Z.C.; Funding acquisition, W.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Jiangsu Province “Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation Doctor” Project (JSSCBS20211145) in 2021 and the Jiangsu Intelligent Optoelectronic Devices and Measurement and Control Engineering Research Center open project in 2022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

An experimental study by Xu et al. [23] further supports the simulation results [24]. Link to: https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2019.2962184 and https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1063782608110195. Most of the simulation conclusions in this paper can be confirmed by the data of other researchers that have been published. The specific document name is: “Chip size-dependent light extraction efficiency for blue micro-LEDs”. The link is: https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201909862999978.page.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Tao of Nanjing University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hsiang, E.L.; Li, Y.; He, Z.; Zhan, T.; Zhang, C.; Lan, Y.F.; Dong, Y.; Wu, S.T. Enhancing the efficiency of color conversion micro-LED display with a patterned cholesteric liquid crystal polymer film. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fan, Z.Y.; Lin, J.Y.; Jiang, H.X. III-nitride micro-emitter arrays: Development and applications. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2008, 41, 94001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wu, T.; Sher, C.-W.; Lin, Y.; Lee, C.-F.; Liang, S.; Lu, Y.; Huang Chen, S.-W.H.; Guo, W.; Kuo, H.-C.; Chen, Z. Mini-LED and micro-LED: Promising candidates for the next generation display technology. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Huang, Y.; Tan, G.; Gou, F.; Li, M.-C.; Lee, S.-L.; Wu, S.-T. Prospects and challenges of mini-LED and micro-LED displays. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2019, 27, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Park, H.J.; Cha, Y.J.; Kwak, J.S. Chip size-dependent light extraction efficiency for blue micro-LEDs. J. Korean Inst. Electr. Electron. Mater. Eng. 2019, 32, 47–52. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang, K.; Yu, L.; Sang, J. P-5.13: Visual luminance uniformity and OD value calculation for direct type mini-LED backlight. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2019, 50 (Suppl. S1), 750–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tan, G.; Huang, Y.; Li, M.C.; Lee, S.L.; Wu, S.T. High dynamic range liquid crystal displays with a mini-LED backlight. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 16572–16584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Deng, Z.; Zheng, B.; Zheng, J.; Wu, L.; Yang, W.; Lin, Z.; Shen, P.; Li, J. 74–5: Late-news paper: High dynamic range Incell LCD with excellent performance. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2018, 49, 996–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, E.; Guo, J.; Jiang, Z.; Shen, Q.; Ye, Y.; Xu, S.; Sun, J.; Yan, Q.; Guo, T. Edge/direct-lit hybrid mini-LED backlight with U-grooved light guiding plates for local dimming. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 12179–12194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, R.; Luo, Z.; Chen, H.; Dong, Y.; Wu, S.T. Realizing Rec. 2020 color gamut with quantum dot displays. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 23680–23693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Chen, E.; Xie, H.; Huang, J.; Miu, H.; Shao, G.; Li, Y.; Guo, T.; Xu, S.; Ye, Y. Flexible/curved backlight module with quantum-dots microstructure array for liquid crystal displays. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 3466–3482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Peng, F.; Chen, H.; Gou, F.; Lee, Y.H.; Wand, M.; Li, M.C.; Lee, S.L.; Wu, S.T. Analytical equation for the motion picture response time of display devices. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 121, 023108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Tsai, C.C.; Wu, S.T. Broadband wide-angle polarization converter for LCD backlight. Appl. Opt. 2008, 47, 2882–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Lu, Z.Z.J.; Lee, J.W., III; Kim, J.M. Wide-angle film diffuser. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2007, 15, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Z.; Guo, L.; Dai, K.; Liao, Y.; Ma, R.; Li, C.; Wang, Z.; Shao, X. P-11.2: The analysis of light-leakage under the large viewing angle for LCD. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2019, 50 (Suppl. S1), 910–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gou, F.; Hsiang, E.L.; Tan, G.; Chou, P.T.; Li, Y.L.; Lan, Y.F.; Wu, S.T. Angular color shift of micro-LED displays. Opt. Express 2019, 27, A746–A757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lu, Z.; Tian, P.; Chen, H.; Baranowski, I.; Fu, H.; Huang, X.; Montes, J.; Fan, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu, X.; et al. Active tracking system for visible light communication using a GaN-based micro-LED and NRZ-OOK. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 17971–17981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Han, H.V.; Lin, H.Y.; Lin, C.C.; Chong, W.C.; Li, J.R.; Chen, K.J.; Yu, P.; Chen, T.M.; Chen, H.M.; Lau, K.M.; et al. Resonant-enhanced full-color emission of quantum-dot-based micro LED display technology. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 32504–32515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gordon, J.; Harman, S. A graduated cylinder colorimeter: An investigation of path length and the Beer–Lambert law. J. Chem. Educ. 2002, 79, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, L.; Ng, C.W.; Wong, N.; Wong, K.K.Y.; Lai, P.T.; Choi, H.W. Pixel-to-pixel fiber-coupled emissive micro-light-emitting diode arrays. IEEE Photonics J. 2009, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bayneva, I.I. Calculation and construction of optical elements of light devices. Dilemas Contemp. Educ. Política Valores 2019, 6, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guo, W.; Meng, H.; Chen, Y.; Sun, T.; Li, Y. Wafer-level monolithic integration of vertical micro-LEDs on glass. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2020, 32, 673–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, F.F.; Tao, T.; Liu, B.; Wang, X.; Gong, M.G.; Zhi, T.; Pan, D.; Xie, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Zheng, Y.; et al. High-performance semi-polar inGaN/GaN green micro light-emitting-diodes. IEEE Photon. J. 2019, 12, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lelikov, Y.S.; Bochkareva, N.I.; Gorbunov, R.I.; Martynov, I.A.; Rebane, Y.T.; Tarkin, D.V.; Shreter, Y.G. Measurement of the absorption coefficient for light laterally propagating in light-emitting diode structures with In0. 2Ga0. 8N/GaN quantum wells. Semiconductors. 2008, 42, 1342–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Du, Y.; Chang, B.; Fu, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, M. Electronic structure and optical properties of zinc-blende GaN. Optik 2012, 123, 2208–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhao, G.Y.; Ishikawa, H.; Jiang, H.; Egawa, T.; Jimbo, T.; Umeno, M. Optical absorption and photoluminescence studies of n-type GaN. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 38, L993–L995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, D.; Thomas, M.E.; Tropf, W.J. Infrared refractive index of sapphire as a function of temperature. Window Dome Technol. Mater. 1999, 3705, 60–69. [Google Scholar]
  28. O’Mahony, D.; Hossain, M.N.; Justice, J.; Pelucchi, E.; O’Riordan, A. High index contrast optical platform using gallium phosphide on sapphire: An alternative to SOI. Silicon Photonics Photonic Integr. Circuits 2012, 8431, 294–301. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The structure of a micro-LED cell and the direction of 0°.
Figure 1. The structure of a micro-LED cell and the direction of 0°.
Materials 15 08854 g001
Figure 2. Simulated light distribution of a constant-thickness micro-LED cell for various chip sizes.
Figure 2. Simulated light distribution of a constant-thickness micro-LED cell for various chip sizes.
Materials 15 08854 g002
Figure 3. Simulated light distribution of a constant-thickness micro-LED cell for various semi-sphere micro-structure sizes.
Figure 3. Simulated light distribution of a constant-thickness micro-LED cell for various semi-sphere micro-structure sizes.
Materials 15 08854 g003
Figure 4. Simulated light distribution of a constant-size micro-LED cell for various (Al2O3)2 film thicknesses with a 10-μm chip size.
Figure 4. Simulated light distribution of a constant-size micro-LED cell for various (Al2O3)2 film thicknesses with a 10-μm chip size.
Materials 15 08854 g004
Figure 5. Simulated light distribution of a constant-size micro-LED cell for various (Al2O3)2 film thicknesses with a 30-μm chip size.
Figure 5. Simulated light distribution of a constant-size micro-LED cell for various (Al2O3)2 film thicknesses with a 30-μm chip size.
Materials 15 08854 g005
Table 1. Refractive and absorption indices of materials in micro-LEDs in the 10–50-μm chip-size range [5,24,25,26,27,28].
Table 1. Refractive and absorption indices of materials in micro-LEDs in the 10–50-μm chip-size range [5,24,25,26,27,28].
MaterialThicknessRefractive IndexAbsorption Index [mm−1]
Semi-sphere micro-structureΦ 3 µm1.700.004
Sapphire5 µm1.700.004
ITO300 nm1.500
p-GaN150 nm2.452.300
Active layer (MQW)100 nm2.5425
n-GaN6.75 µm2.452.3
Table 2. Refractive and absorption indices of materials in a micro-LED unit with a 10-μm chip and a 1–4 μm semi-sphere micro-structure range [5,24,25,26,27,28].
Table 2. Refractive and absorption indices of materials in a micro-LED unit with a 10-μm chip and a 1–4 μm semi-sphere micro-structure range [5,24,25,26,27,28].
MaterialThickness (µm)Refractive IndexAbsorption Index [mm−1]
Semi-sphere micro-structureΦ1–41.700.004
Table 3. Refractive and absorption indices of materials in a micro-LED unit with a 10-μm chip, 3-μm semi-sphere micro-structure, and 10–50-μm Al2O3 range [5,24,25,26,27,28].
Table 3. Refractive and absorption indices of materials in a micro-LED unit with a 10-μm chip, 3-μm semi-sphere micro-structure, and 10–50-μm Al2O3 range [5,24,25,26,27,28].
MaterialThicknessRefractive IndexAbsorption Index [mm−1]
Semi-sphere micro-structureΦ3 µm1.700.004
Al2O310–50 µm1.700.004
ITO300 nm1.500
p-GaN150 nm2.452.300
Active layer100 nm2.5425
n-GaN6.75 µm2.452.300
Table 4. Light efficiency of a constant-thickness micro-LED cell for various chip sizes with a 30-μm Al2O3 film and a 3-μm semi-sphere micro-structure size.
Table 4. Light efficiency of a constant-thickness micro-LED cell for various chip sizes with a 30-μm Al2O3 film and a 3-μm semi-sphere micro-structure size.
Chip Size [μm]Light Efficiency
100.653
200.590
300.605
400.597
500.572
Table 5. Light efficiency of a constant-size micro-LED cell for various semi-diameters of the semi-sphere micro-structure at various (Al2O3)2 film thicknesses.
Table 5. Light efficiency of a constant-size micro-LED cell for various semi-diameters of the semi-sphere micro-structure at various (Al2O3)2 film thicknesses.
Semi-Diameter of the Semi-Sphere Micro-Structure at a 10-μm-Thick (Al2O3)2 FilmLight EfficiencySemi-Diameter of the Semi-Sphere Micro-Structure at a 30-μm-Thick (Al2O3)2 FilmLight Efficiency
0.50.5430.50.633
10.51810.656
1.50.6531.50.653
20.64420.644
Table 6. Light efficiency of a constant-size micro-LED cell for various (Al2O3)2 film thicknesses at various semi-diameters with a 10-μm chip size.
Table 6. Light efficiency of a constant-size micro-LED cell for various (Al2O3)2 film thicknesses at various semi-diameters with a 10-μm chip size.
(Al2O3)2 Film Thickness at a 0.5-μm Semi-Diameter of the Semi-Sphere Micro-StructureLight Efficiency(Al2O3)2 Film Thickness at a 1-μm Semi-Diameter of the Semi-Sphere Micro-StructureLight Efficiency(Al2O3)2 Film Thickness at a 1.5-μm Semi-Diameter of the Semi-Sphere Micro-StructureLight Efficiency(Al2O3)2 Film Thickness at a 2-μm Semi-Diameter of the Semi-Sphere Micro-StructureLight Efficiency
100.543100.518100.653100.644
300.633300.656300.653300.644
500.617500.655500.652500.644
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wei, W.; Chen, Y.; Wang, C.; Peng, X.; Tang, T.; Chen, Z. Simulation of Far-Field Light Distribution of Micro-LED Based on Its Structural Parameters. Materials 2022, 15, 8854. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248854

AMA Style

Wei W, Chen Y, Wang C, Peng X, Tang T, Chen Z. Simulation of Far-Field Light Distribution of Micro-LED Based on Its Structural Parameters. Materials. 2022; 15(24):8854. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248854

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wei, Wei, Yiying Chen, Chenxi Wang, Xing Peng, Tang Tang, and Zhizhong Chen. 2022. "Simulation of Far-Field Light Distribution of Micro-LED Based on Its Structural Parameters" Materials 15, no. 24: 8854. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248854

APA Style

Wei, W., Chen, Y., Wang, C., Peng, X., Tang, T., & Chen, Z. (2022). Simulation of Far-Field Light Distribution of Micro-LED Based on Its Structural Parameters. Materials, 15(24), 8854. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248854

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop