Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Oxidation on the Magnetic, Electrical, and Mechanical Properties of Co40Fe40Yb20 Films
Previous Article in Journal
Superhydrophobic and Corrosion Behaviour of PVDF-CeO2 Composite Coatings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Glutathione Fluorescence Sensing Based on a Co-Doped Carbon Dot/Manganese Dioxide Nanocoral Composite

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(23), 8677; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238677
Submission received: 2 November 2022 / Revised: 28 November 2022 / Accepted: 1 December 2022 / Published: 5 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Biomaterials)

Abstract

:
Glutathione (GSH) is an antioxidant thiol that has a vital role in the pathogenesis of various human diseases such as cardiovascular disease and cancer. Hence, it is necessary to study effective methods of GSH evaluation. In our work, an effective GSH sensor based on a nitrogen and phosphorus co-doped carbon dot (NPCD)-MnO2 nanocoral composite was fabricated. In addition to utilizing the strong fluorescence of the NPCDs, we utilized the reductant ability of the NPCDs themselves to form MnO2 and then the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite from MnO4-. The characteristics of the nanocoral composite were analyzed using various electron microscopy techniques and spectroscopic techniques. The overlap between the absorption spectrum of MnO2 and the fluorescence emission spectrum of the NPCDs led to effective fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) in the nanocoral composite, causing a decrease in the fluorescent intensity of the NPCDs. A linear recovery of the fluorescent intensity of the NPCDs was observed with the GSH level raising from 20 to 250 µM. Moreover, our GSH sensor showed high specificity and sensing potential in real samples with acceptable results.

1. Introduction

Glutathione (GSH) is a tripeptide of glutamic acid, glycine, and cysteine. GSH is an important antioxidant produced by the liver [1]. GSH is the predominant low molecular-weight thiol in human cells with a concentration from 0.5–10 mmol/L. Most of the cellular GSH is present in the cytosol (85–90%) and the remainder exists in many organelles. The extracellular concentrations of GSH are relatively low (for example: 2–20 μmol/L in plasma) [2]. GSH combats free radicals that can damage the cells and also has a significant role in many processes in the human body, such as immune system response regulation, cell propagation control, cysteine transport and storage, and tissue building [3,4]. GSH deficiency is associated with oxidative stress, which is a main cause of aging. In addition, low levels of GSH have been reported in patient samples suffering from Alzheimer’s disease, liver damage, neurotoxicity, and cancer; hence, GSH can be considered as an important universal biomarker in the diagnosis and therapy of a range of diseases [5,6].
Many GSH sensing approaches have previously been developed and presented, such as electrochemistry [7], electrochemiluminescence [8], Raman spectroscopy [9], fluorescence [10], high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [11], and colorimetry [12]. Among the mentioned methods, fluorescence-based sensing is one of the most promising methods owing to its ease of sample preparation and operational simplicity.
The fabrication of fluorescent sensors relies on intramolecular processes such as photoinduced electron transfer (PET), and photoinduced charge transfer (PCT) or intermolecular processes, including the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), and inner filter effect (IFE); these intermolecular processes relate to energy transfer between at least two independent molecules [13,14]. In this study, we fabricated a GSH fluorescent sensor using a nitrogen and phosphorus co-doped carbon dot (NPCD)-MnO2 nanocoral composite. The FRET between NPCDs and MnO2 components in the composite is the basis for the fabrication of a GSH “turn on” sensor.
Carbon dots (CDs) are well known fluorescent materials that have attracted considerable attention from researchers owing to their outstanding photoluminescence stability, high water solubility, non-toxicity, tunable surface functionalities, and favorable biocompatibility [15,16]. For heteroatom-doped carbon dots, such as NPCDs, in addition to their excellent properties, the fluorescence performance is significantly enhanced, as demonstrated in our previous study [17]. Hence, NPCDs are promising candidates for the fabrication of fluorescence sensors. There is an abundance of carboxyl (‒COOH) and hydroxyl (‒OH) groups on the surface of CDs produced by a hydrothermal synthesis [18]. The ‒OH allows the CDs to play the role of green reductants, while the negatively charged ‒COOH on the CDs can stabilize metal particles in their formation process [19,20]. Therefore, in this study, we not only focused on the fluorescent properties of NPCDs but also took full advantage of the NPCDs as potential reducing and stabilizing agents. We used NPCDs as reductants to form MnO2 nanocorals through a redox reaction between the NPCDs and KMnO4, which subsequently contributed to the formation of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite. MnO2 is known as a good quencher of fluorophores [21]; therefore, the fluorescent intensity of the composite is considerably quenched compared to that of pristine NPCDs. When GSH is added to the material solution, fluorescence recovery of the NPCDs occurs. In summary, NPCDs play two vital functions: (1) as a fluorescent source, and (2) as a reducing and stabilizing agent for MnO2 in the fabrication of an NPCD-MnO2 based FRET sensor for GSH. The GSH sensing is described in Scheme 1.

2. Methods

2.1. Chemicals

MnCl2, KMnO4, (NH4)2HPO4, Ca(NO3)2, K2SO4, NaCl, citric acid monohydrate, glutathione, glucose, saccharose, glycine, methionine, lysine, cysteine, tryptophan, methionine, deionized water, and human serum, were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA.

2.2. Instruments

UV–Vis and photoluminescence (PL) spectra were obtained using a G1103A UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and a QuantaMaster TM 50 PTI spectrofluorometer (Photon Technology International, Birmingham, NJ, USA), respectively. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed using an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (PHI 5000, Kanagawa, Japan). Raman spectroscopy was performed using a Raman spectrometer (ANDOR Monora500i, Belfast, UK) with a laser excitation of 633 nm. The morphological structure and size of the samples were characterized using scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM; S-4700, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and (TEM; Tecnai, F30S-Twin, Hillsboro, OR, USA).

2.3. Preparation of NPCDs

The synthesis of NPCDs was reported in our previous study [17]. A mixture including citric acid monohydrate (1 g), (NH4)2HPO4 (2.5 g), and deionized water (15 mL) was poured into a 30 mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave and heated at 180 °C for 4 h. After cooling to room temperature, the solution was purified using a polyethersulfone membrane (0.22 µm) and then dialyzed in a dialysis bag (MWCO: 1000 Da) for 48 h. The resulting solution was lyophilized to obtain a powdery substance.

2.4. NPCD-MnO2 Nanocoral Composite Synthesis

The NPCD solution (0.075 g/mL, 5 mL) was added dropwise to DI water (95 mL) while stirring and heating. After the mixture was heated to boiling, a MnCl2 solution (0.5 mL, 0.1 M) was dropped into the mixture. After 5 min, a KMnO4 solution (0.35 mL, 0.1 M) was continually dropped to the mixture. The solution color turned brown, indicating the formation of MnO2. The heating process was then stopped, and the solution was continually vibrated for 2 h, then centrifuged and washed with deionized water to eliminate impurities. The precipitate was dried at 60 °C, re-dispersed in DI water, and placed in a refrigerator at 4 °C.

2.5. GSH Detection

The GSH sensing experiment was performed at room temperature. First, the NPCD-MnO2 solution (500 µL, 0.019 g/mL) and deionized water (2500 µL) were mixed under sonication to obtain a solution. Then, a variety amount of GSH solution were added to obtain levels of 0.1–250 µM. The solutions were diluted by deionized water to reach the final volume of 3500 µL. The solutions allowed to equilibrate for 30 min before a fluorescent measurement was carried out under an excitation wavelength of 360 nm. The experiment was repeated three times at each concentration.

2.6. GSH Detection in Human Serum

The NPCD-MnO2 solution (500 µL) was dropped into deionized water, followed by human serum (30 µL). Deionized water was added to dilute the solution to 3000 µL. An amount of GSH solution was added, then diluted before fluorescent analysis. GSH sensing in the human serum samples was performed as presented in Section 2.5.

2.7. Selectivity

The fluorescent response of other substances was explored to determine their interference to GSH sensing and relied on NPCD-MnO2 composite material.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. NPCD-MnO2 Nanocoral Composite Characteristics

The optical properties of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite were characterized using UV–Vis and photoluminescence spectroscopy. The absorption spectra of the NPCD, MnO2, and NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite solutions are shown in Figure 1. The NPCD solution shows two peaks at 234 and 334 nm. Pure MnO2, which was synthesized through the pyrolysis of KMnO4, shows a peak at 385 nm. The specific absorption peaks of both pure NPCDs and pure MnO2 appear in the spectrum of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite, confirming the reduction of NPCDs to form MnO2.
The fluorescent emission spectrum of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite indicates a peak placed in 450 nm corresponding to an excitation peak at 372 nm (Figure 2). Hence, there is no marked shift in the emission and excitation spectra of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite compared to those of pure NPCDs situated in 446 nm and 367 nm, respectively. However, the fluorescent intensity of the composite is dramatically decreased compared to that of pure NPCDs. This quenching occurs because of the FRET between the NPCDs and MnO2 in the composite, as described in Section 2.1.
The morphological structure and size of the NPCD-MnO2 composite was displayed in the SEM and TEM images (Figure 3). As observed in the SEM results at different magnifications, the NPCD-MnO2 composite has a flower-like architecture, composed of many nanosheets with sizes ranging from 250 to 500 nm. The SEM images show good agreement with the TEM images. Moreover, the TEM image (Figure 3D) shows the petals of the nanocoral composite are thin and connected to each other. A high-resolution (HR) TEM image (Figure 3E) indicates the nanocoral composite crystalline structure.
The XPS profile (Figure 4A) shows peaks at 138.17, 284.23, 399.31, 536.11, 640.69, and 656.63 eV, matching to P2p, C1s, N1s, O1s, Mn2p (Mn2p3/2 and Mn2p1/2), respectively. The weight contributions of Mn, C, N, O, and P are found to be 26.49%, 19.26%, 1.47%, 51.89%, and 0.88%, respectively. Figure 4B shows the high-resolution XPS profile of Mn2p. The peaks of the metallic states of Mn0, including Mn2p3/2 and Mn2p1/2, are placed in 642.59 and 654.25 eV, respectively. Because of the variety of functional groups, including amine, phosphate, carboxyl, and hydroxyl groups, on the surfaces of the NPCDs, the C1s peak can be separated into four peaks corresponding to C‒N/C‒P, C‒C/C=C, C‒O, and C=O bonds, which are placed in 285.14, 284.38, 286.46, and 288.68 eV, respectively (Figure 4C). Characteristic bonding is also analyzed in the high-resolution XPS profiles of P2p and N1s, which highly agree to those presented in our previous studies [13,17].
Figure 4D shows the Raman spectra of MnO2, NPCDs, and the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite. Because of the Mn–O stretching vibration, there are two peaks at 662 and 735 cm−1 in the Raman spectrum of pristine MnO2. Structural defects and the E2g phonon of sp2-bonded carbon atoms in a two-dimensional hexagonal lattice lead to the appearance of the disordered and graphitic bands located at 1290 and 1591 cm−1, respectively, in the spectrum of the NPCDs [22]. For the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite, the characteristic disordered and graphitic bands of the NPCDs appear along with the two peaks of MnO2. These results further confirm the successful use of NPCDs as reductants to form MnO2, as well as the amalgamation of NPCDs and MnO2 in the nanocoral composite.

3.2. Sensing of GSH

3.2.1. Sensing Mechanism

As fluorescent spectra in Figure 2, the intensity of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite drop markedly compared to that of the pristine NPCDs. This is the result of FRET, which happens because of the overlap between the absorption spectrum of the MnO2 component and the emission spectrum of the NPCD component in the nanocoral composite. The overlapped spectra are shown in Figure 5A.
However, when GSH is added to the solution of NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite, the fluorescent intensity of the composite recovers. In contrast, GSH cannot turn on the fluorescence of pristine NPCDs (Figure 5B). This is because MnO2 can be reduced effectively to Mn2+ through the oxidation of GSH to form glutathione disulfide (GSSG), according to the special reaction presented in Equation (1) [23,24]. The decomposition of MnO2 interrupts the FRET between the NPCDs and MnO2, thus “turning on” the fluorescence of the NPCDs.
2GSH + MnO2 + 2H+ → GSSG + Mn2+ + 2H2O

3.2.2. Optimization

It is well known that the stability and the intensity of fluorophores are strongly dependent on pH. Therefore, we investigated the pH influence on the fluorescent properties of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite. As presented in a previous study, NPCDs, which are one of the components in the nanocoral composite, exhibit a low fluorescent intensity in strongly acidic solutions. The intensity of the NPCDs reaches its maximum value and remains stable with pH from 6 to 10 [17]. Hence, in this study, the influence of pH values from 4 to 9 on the intensity of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite was investigated. The intensity of the composite grows steadily with pH from 4 to 6.5, then decreases from pH 7, reaching the lowest intensity at pH 9 (Figure 6). Based on these results, pH 6.5 was determined to be the optimal pH to maintain the high fluorescent intensity of the nanocoral composite. However, as discussed in Section 2.1, the reduction of MnO2 by GSH occurs under acidic conditions. Therefore, we chose a pH value of 6 to obtain better sensing performance.
To study the optimal time for GSH sensing, the fluorescent intensity of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite when adding 20 µM GSH was recorded every 5 min. Figure 7 indicates that the composite intensity raises steadily in the first 40 min. Thereafter, the intensity fluctuates slightly. Hence, 40 min was considered the optimal time for GSH sensing.

3.2.3. GSH Sensing

When GSH is added, the fluorescence of the NPCD-MnO2 composite recovers (Figure 8. The fluorescent intensity of the composite increases steadily with increasing GSH concentrations belong to the range of 0–250 µM. A linear correlation is observed between the NPCD-MnO2 composite intensity and GSH levels of 20 to 250 µM. The corresponding equation is I/Io = 1.31061 + 0.00242CM, which has a correlation coefficient (R2) value of 0.9932. To examine the productivity of the method, the sensing performance was repeated, and the data were plotted with standard deviations (SD). The limit of detection (LOD) was determined using the following equation:
LOD = 3m/n,
where m is the SD value of the blank solution, and n is the slope of the calibration curve.
With values of m and n of 0.00239 and 0.00242, respectively, the LOD was calculated to be approximately 1 µM. Table 1 presents a comparison between the sensing results of our method and those of others.

3.2.4. GSH Sensing in Human Serum

GSH sensing performance in human serum was measured to confirm the feasibility of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite-based sensor. Table 2 indicates that the recovery of GSH is 94.5%–108.4% and all the relative standard deviations (RSDs) are less than 4% with three repetitions of the experiment. This performance approves the potential of using NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite for the practical detection of GSH.

3.2.5. Selective Investigation

High selectivity is a necessary requirement for sensor use. To evaluate the NPCD-MnO2 composite as specific to the sensing of GSH, the fluorescent responses of carbohydrates, amino acids, and ions were investigated with and without adding GSH. Figure 9 displays the addition of carbohydrates, other amino acids, and ions does not enhance the fluorescent intensity of the composite. However, when GSH co-exists with the other substances, the fluorescent intensity is recovered. This indicates that it is impossible for the other substances to interfere with the ability of GSH to “turn on” the fluorescence. The high denticity of GSH, which typically consists of two or more parts of the molecule (–SH and –COO), is in charge of the “turn on” phenomenon. This chelation makes the interactions of the metal atom and the GSH stronger than that of other substances possessing either a single –SH, weak amine, or –COO- binding group [33]. Therefore, the GSH– MnO2 interaction is much stronger than that of the others investigated. In addition, as mentioned in Section 2.1, GSH can reduce MnO2 to Mn2+, thus interrupting the FRET between the NPCDs and MnO2 and leading to recovery of the fluorescent intensity of the NPCDs. The considerable enhancement in the fluorescent intensity of the composite with the addition of GSH ensures that the sensing method replied on the NPCD-MnO2 composite is specific for GSH.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we successfully applied NPCDs as a reductant to form MnO2 from KMnO4 and the subsequent nanocoral composite. We relied on the fluorescent quenching property of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite to design a “turn on” fluorescence sensor for the GSH evaluation. Steady recovery in the fluorescent intensity of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite was observed with increasing GSH concentration. A linear correlation was obtained between the fluorescent intensity and GSH concentration from 20 to 250 µM, with an R2 value of 0.9932. The LOD was determined to be 1 µM. The effectiveness, selectivity, and simplicity of fabrication and operation render the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite-based GSH sensor a potential method for GSH detection and contributes to the development of a new strategy for simple sensing approaches in biomedical application.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.-H.L.; Methodology, T.-H.L.; Formal analysis, T.-H.L.; Investigation, T.-H.L.; Writing—original draft, T.-H.L.; Writing—review & editing, Q.-N.T.; Supervision, Q.-N.T.; Project administration, H.-J.L.; Funding acquisition, H.-J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Capacity Enhancement Project through a Korea Basic Science Institute (National Research Facilities and Equipment Center) grant funded by the Ministry of Education (Grant No. 2019R1A6C1010016).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

We have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Saydam, N.; Kirb, A.; Demir, O.; Hazan, E.; Oto, O.; Saydam, O.; Guner, G. Determination of glutathione, glutathione reductase, glutathione peroxidase and glutathione S-transferase levels in human lung cancer tissues. Cancer Lett. 1997, 119, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, G.; Fang, Y.-Z.; Yang, S.; Lupton, J.R.; Turner, N.D. Glutathione Metabolism and Its Implications for Health. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Tsiasioti, A.; Tzanavaras, P.D. Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide using zone fluidics and fluorimetric detection. Talanta 2021, 222, 121559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sen, C.K. Nutritional biochemistry of cellular glutathione. J. Nutr. Biochem. 1997, 8, 660–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Torres, S.; Matías, N.; Baulies, A.; Nuñez, S.; Alarcon-Vila, C.; Martinez, L.; Nuño, N.; Fernandez, A.; Caballeria, J.; Levade, T.; et al. Mitochondrial GSH replenishment as a potential therapeutic approach for Niemann Pick type C disease. Redox Biol. 2017, 11, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Kong, F.; Liang, Z.; Luan, D.; Liu, X.; Xu, K.; Tang, B. A Glutathione (GSH)-Responsive Near-Infrared (NIR) Theranostic Prodrug for Cancer Therapy and Imaging. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 6450–6456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Noh, H.-B.; Chandra, P.; Moon, J.O.; Shim, Y.-B. In vivo detection of glutathione disulfide and oxidative stress monitoring using a biosensor. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 2600–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Niu, W.-J.; Zhu, R.-H.; Cosnier, S.; Zhang, X.-J.; Shan, D. Ferrocyanide-Ferricyanide Redox Couple Induced Electrochemiluminescence Amplification of Carbon Dots for Ultrasensitive Sensing of Glutathione. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 11150–11156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Saha, A.; Jana, N.R. Detection of Cellular Glutathione and Oxidized Glutathione Using Magnetic–Plasmonic Nanocomposite-Based “Turn-Off” Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 9221–9228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, C.; Deng, W.; Liu, H.; Ge, S.; Yan, M. Turn-on fluorescence sensor for glutathione in aqueous solutions using carbon dots–MnO2 nanocomposites. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 216, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Giustarini, D.; Dalle-Donne, I.; Colombo, R.; Milzani, A.; Rossi, R. An improved HPLC measurement for GSH and GSSG in human blood. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2003, 35, 1365–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Balkrishna, S.J.; Hodage, A.S.; Kumar, S.; Panini, P.; Kumar, S. Sensitive and regenerable organochalcogen probes for the colorimetric detection of thiols. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 11535–11538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Le, T.H.; Kim, J.H.; Park, S.J. ”Turn on” Fluorescence Sensor of Glutathione Based on Inner Filter Effect of Co-Doped Carbon Dot/Gold Nanoparticle Composites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Burratti, L.; Ciotta, E.; De Matteis, F.; Prosposito, P. Metal Nanostructures for Environmental Pollutant Detection Based on Fluorescence. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ming, F.L.; Hou, J.Z.; Hou, C.J.; Yang, M.; Wang, X.F.; Li, J.W.; Huo, D.Q.; He, Q. One-step synthesized fluorescent nitrogen doped carbon dots from thymidine for Cr (VI) detection in water. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2019, 222, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wu, X.R.; Wu, L.N.; Cao, X.Z.; Li, Y.; Liu, A.R.; Liu, S.Q. Nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots for fluorescence detection of Cu2+ and electrochemical monitoring of bisphenol A. Rsc Adv. 2018, 8, 20000–20006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Le, T.H.; Lee, H.J.; Kim, J.H.; Park, S.J. Detection of Ferric Ions and Catecholamine Neurotransmitters via Highly Fluorescent Heteroatom Co-Doped Carbon Dots. Sensors 2020, 20, 3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Singh, I.; Arora, R.; Dhiman, H.; Pahwa, R. Carbon Quantum Dots: Synthesis, Characterization and Biomedical Applications. Turk. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 15, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, M.X.; Chen, T.; Gooding, J.J.; Liu, J.Q. Review of Carbon and Graphene Quantum Dots for Sensing. Acs Sens. 2019, 4, 1732–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, J.L.; Yin, B.C.; Wu, X.; Ye, B.C. Simple and Cost-Effective Glucose Detection Based on Carbon Nanodots Supported on Silver Nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 1323–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Halawa, M.I.; Wu, F.X.; Zafar, M.N.; Mostafa, I.M.; Abdussalam, A.; Han, S.; Xu, G.B. Turn-on fluorescent glutathione detection based on lucigenin and MnO2 nanosheets. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 3542–3549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Liu, S.; Liu, X.; Yang, S. Synthesis of hydrothermally reduced graphene/MnO2 composites and their electrochemical properties as supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 8160–8165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Deng, R.R.; Xie, X.J.; Vendrell, M.; Chang, Y.T.; Liu, X.G. Intracellular Glutathione Detection Using MnO2-Nanosheet-Modified Upconversion Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 20168–20171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, X.L.; Zheng, C.; Guo, S.S.; Li, J.; Yang, H.H.; Chen, G.N. Turn-On Fluorescence Sensor for Intracellular Imaging of Glutathione Using g-C3N4 Nanosheet-MnO2 Sandwich Nanocomposite. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 3426–3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Vobornikova, I.; Pohanka, M. Smartphone-based colorimetric detection of glutathione. Neuroendocrinol. Lett. 2016, 37, 139–143. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, Q.; Li, L.F.; Wang, X.D.; Dong, C.; Shuang, S.M. Graphene quantum dots wrapped square-plate-like MnO2 nanocomposite as a fluorescent turn-on sensor for glutathione. Talanta 2020, 219, 121180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zheng, C.; Ding, L.; Wu, Y.N.; Tan, X.H.; Zeng, Y.Y.; Zhang, X.L.; Liu, X.L.; Liu, J.F. A near-infrared turn-on fluorescence probe for glutathione detection based on nanocomposites of semiconducting polymer dots and MnO2 nanosheets. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 8167–8176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chu, S.Y.; Wang, H.Q.; Du, Y.X.; Yang, F.; Yang, L.; Jiang, C.L. Portable Smartphone Platform Integrated with a Nanoprobe-Based Fluorescent Paper Strip: Visual Monitoring of Glutathione in Human Serum for Health Prognosis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 8175–8183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Anik, U.; Cubukcu, M.; Ertas, F.N. An effective electrochemical biosensing platform for the detection of reduced glutathione. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2016, 44, 971–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rawat, B.; Mishra, K.K.; Barman, U.; Arora, L.; Pal, D.; Paily, R.P. Two-Dimensional MoS2-Based Electrochemical Biosensor for Highly Selective Detection of Glutathione. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 6937–6944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barman, U.; Mukhopadhyay, G.; Goswami, N.; Ghosh, S.S.; Paily, R.P. Detection of Glutathione by Glutathione-S-Transferase-Nanoconjugate Ensemble Electrochemical Device. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 2017, 16, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tian, J.; Zhao, P.; Zhang, S.S.; Huo, G.A.; Suo, Z.C.; Yue, Z.; Zhang, S.M.; Huang, W.P.; Zhu, B.L. Platinum and Iridium Oxide Co-modified TiO2 Nanotubes Array Based Photoelectrochemical Sensors for Glutathione. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Díaz-Cruz, M.S.; Mendieta, J.; Tauler, R.; Esteban, M. Cadmium-binding properties of glutathione: A chemometrical analysis of voltammetric data. J. Inorg. Biochem. 1997, 66, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Illustration of the GSH sensing method relied on an NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite material.
Scheme 1. Illustration of the GSH sensing method relied on an NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite material.
Materials 15 08677 sch001
Figure 1. Absorption spectra (inset: aqueous solutions) of NPCDs, MnO2, and the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite.
Figure 1. Absorption spectra (inset: aqueous solutions) of NPCDs, MnO2, and the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite.
Materials 15 08677 g001
Figure 2. Emission and excitation fluorescent spectra of NPCDs and the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite.
Figure 2. Emission and excitation fluorescent spectra of NPCDs and the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite.
Materials 15 08677 g002
Figure 3. (A,B) SEM images; (C,D) TEM images; and (E) HRTEM image (inset: fast Fourier transform (FFT) pattern) of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite.
Figure 3. (A,B) SEM images; (C,D) TEM images; and (E) HRTEM image (inset: fast Fourier transform (FFT) pattern) of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite.
Materials 15 08677 g003
Figure 4. (A) XPS element survey of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite. High-resolution XPS spectra of (B) Mn2p and (C) C1s. (D) Raman spectra of the NPCDs, MnO2, and NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite.
Figure 4. (A) XPS element survey of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite. High-resolution XPS spectra of (B) Mn2p and (C) C1s. (D) Raman spectra of the NPCDs, MnO2, and NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite.
Materials 15 08677 g004
Figure 5. (A) Overlap spectra of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite; (B) variation in the fluorescent intensity of NPCDs and the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite (inset: enlarged fluorescent spectra of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite) with and without adding GSH (150 µM).
Figure 5. (A) Overlap spectra of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite; (B) variation in the fluorescent intensity of NPCDs and the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite (inset: enlarged fluorescent spectra of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite) with and without adding GSH (150 µM).
Materials 15 08677 g005
Figure 6. (A) Fluorescent spectra and (B) fluorescent intensity of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite in the range of pH from 4 to 9.
Figure 6. (A) Fluorescent spectra and (B) fluorescent intensity of the NPCD-MnO2 nanocoral composite in the range of pH from 4 to 9.
Materials 15 08677 g006
Figure 7. (A) Fluorescent intensity and (B) relative intensity (I/I0) of the NPCD-MnO2 composite with GSH (20 µM) over time.
Figure 7. (A) Fluorescent intensity and (B) relative intensity (I/I0) of the NPCD-MnO2 composite with GSH (20 µM) over time.
Materials 15 08677 g007
Figure 8. (A) Fluorescent spectra and (B) relative fluorescent intensity of the NPCD-MnO2 composite in the existence of different levels of GSH (inset: linear correlation between I/I0 and GSH level from 20 µM to 250 µM).
Figure 8. (A) Fluorescent spectra and (B) relative fluorescent intensity of the NPCD-MnO2 composite in the existence of different levels of GSH (inset: linear correlation between I/I0 and GSH level from 20 µM to 250 µM).
Materials 15 08677 g008
Figure 9. Fluorescent response of the NPCD-MnO2 composite with the addition of 200 µM of different substances including Glucose (Glu), Saccharose (Sac), Glycine (Gly), Lysine (Lys), Methionine (Met), Cysteine (Cys), Tryptophan (Trp), Ca(NO3)2, K2SO4, and NaCl.
Figure 9. Fluorescent response of the NPCD-MnO2 composite with the addition of 200 µM of different substances including Glucose (Glu), Saccharose (Sac), Glycine (Gly), Lysine (Lys), Methionine (Met), Cysteine (Cys), Tryptophan (Trp), Ca(NO3)2, K2SO4, and NaCl.
Materials 15 08677 g009
Table 1. GSH detection performance of our approach and previous approaches.
Table 1. GSH detection performance of our approach and previous approaches.
TechniqueLinear Range
(nM)
LOD
(nM)
Reference
Colorimetry 3   × 10 4 [25]
Fluorescence 70 7   ×   10 4 48[26]
Fluorescence 500 3   ×   10 5 260[27]
Fluorescence 0 5   ×   10 4 190[28]
Electrochemistry 1   ×   10 4 25   ×   10 4 25   ×   10 3 [29]
Electrochemistry 1   ×   10 4 5   ×   10 8 703 [30]
Electrochemistry 100 1   ×   10 7 41.9 [31]
Photoelectrochemsitry 1   ×   10 3 1   ×   10 4 800 [32]
Fluorescence 2   ×   10 4 25   ×   10 4 1   ×   10 3 Our approach
Table 2. GSH sensing performance in human serum.
Table 2. GSH sensing performance in human serum.
SampleAdded (µM)Detected (µM)Recovery (%)RSD (n = 3)
13030.3101.13.6Materials 15 08677 i001
27066.194.52.4
3100108.4108.42.7
4150154.6103.01.5
5200190.595.31.7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Le, T.-H.; Lee, H.-J.; Tran, Q.-N. Glutathione Fluorescence Sensing Based on a Co-Doped Carbon Dot/Manganese Dioxide Nanocoral Composite. Materials 2022, 15, 8677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238677

AMA Style

Le T-H, Lee H-J, Tran Q-N. Glutathione Fluorescence Sensing Based on a Co-Doped Carbon Dot/Manganese Dioxide Nanocoral Composite. Materials. 2022; 15(23):8677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238677

Chicago/Turabian Style

Le, Thi-Hoa, Hyun-Jong Lee, and Quang-Nhat Tran. 2022. "Glutathione Fluorescence Sensing Based on a Co-Doped Carbon Dot/Manganese Dioxide Nanocoral Composite" Materials 15, no. 23: 8677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238677

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop