Next Article in Journal
Improvement of Tribological Performance of TiAlNbN Hard Coatings by Adding AlCrN
Previous Article in Journal
Vibrational Characteristics of a Foam-Filled Short Basalt Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Resin Composite Beetle Elytron Plate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microbiologically Pure Cotton Fabrics Treated with Tetrabutylammonium OXONE as Mild Disinfection Agent

by
Bogdan Bujnicki
1,*,
Przemyslaw Sowinski
1,*,
Tomasz Makowski
1,
Dorota Krasowska
1,
Patrycja Pokora-Sobczak
1,
Inna Shkyliuk
1,2,
Józef Drabowicz
1,3,* and
Ewa Piorkowska
1
1
Centre of Molecular and Macromolecular Studies Polish Academy of Sciences, Sienkiewicza 112, 90-363 Lodz, Poland
2
The Bio-Med-Chem Doctoral School of the University of Lodz and Lodz Institutes of the Polish Academy of Sciences, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland
3
Institute of Chemistry, Jan Dlugosz University in Czestochowa, Armii Krajowej 13/15, 42-200 Czestochowa, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(21), 7749; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15217749
Submission received: 23 September 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 26 October 2022 / Published: 3 November 2022

Abstract

:
The microbiological purity of textiles plays a pivotal role in the use of textiles, especially in hospitals and other medical facilities. Microbiological purity of cotton fabric was achieved by a new disinfection method using tetrabutyloammonium OXONE (TBA-OXONE) before washing. As a result of the disinfection, the cotton fabric became microbiologically pure, despite the markedly decreased washing time with respect to the widely used standard procedure. Shortening of the washing time allowed for significant energy savings. In addition, the effect of the number of disinfection and washing cycles on the tensile properties and tearing force of the fabric was examined. After 120 disinfection and washing cycles the mechanical properties of cotton fabric were only slightly worsened.

1. Introduction

Antibacterial finishing of textiles is increasingly important as it reduces the possibility of infections. It plays a pivotal role in the use of textiles in hospitals and other medical facilities. Widely used antibacterial agents embrace inorganic and organic compounds, some of them of natural origin. They include Ag and Cu nanoparticles [1,2,3,4], chitosan [4,5,6], quaternary ammonium compounds [7,8], N-halamine [9,10], triclosan [4], and others.
Antimicrobial agents can be deposited on textile substrates by a range of methods, including padding, coating, and spraying. The agents inhibit microbial growth by different mechanisms, which embrace: preventing cell reproduction, reacting and destructing the cell membranes, blocking enzymes, and poisoning the cells [11].
The textiles used in medical facilities, like hospitals, have to be frequently washed and disinfected. The applied disinfectants should be easy to use and safe. Moreover, they should not adversely affect the performance of the fabric and its appearance.
The disinfectants that are applied during industrial washing mainly belong to two groups of formulations. The first group is characterized by a low pH value and contains oxidizing agents, most often a mixture of acetic acid (CH3COOH), peracetic acid (CH3COOOH, pH = 1), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is used (e.g., Ozonite, Septonite, Clax Personril 4KL5, Power Classic), also with a small amount (<0.8%) of sulfuric (VI) acid (H2SO4) (e.g., Peracid Asepsis) [12]. The second group of formulations includes sodium and potassium salts or their mixtures with inorganic peroxides and organic additives, e.g., a mixture of sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), sodium perborate (Na2B2O4(OH)4), polyoxyethylene glycol alcohols C12-C16, hydrate of sodium metasilicate (Na2SiO3x9H2O), alkanesulfonic acid (Alk-SO3H), and benzenesulfonic acid (C6H5SO3H) (e.g., Clovin II Seption) [13]. The requirements for disinfectants of cotton textiles include a neutral pH value (≈7). The disinfectants should be also nontoxic, and volatile, and not deteriorate the colors and mechanical performance of the textiles. The above limitations eliminate organic and inorganic acids as well as peracids. The mixture of 1 mol of the stable potassium salt of monopersulfuric (VI) acid (KHSO5), 0.5 mol of potassium salt of hydrosulfuric (VI) acid (KHSO4) and 0.5 mol of potassium sulfate (VI) (K2SO4), is an excellent example of an oxidant as strong as Caro acid [14]. Ammonium salts of the above-mentioned peracids with the addition of H2SO4 in dichloromethane easily oxidize hydroxyimines to ketones.
The potassium monopersulfate mixture 2KHSO5xKHSO4xK2SO4, known as OXONE, is commercially available. In the presence of ketones OXONE decomposes, but with acetone very reactive and unstable dioxirane structure (DMDO) is formed easily, as shown further, and oxidizes alkenes with excellent yields in dichloromethane-water biphasic system [15]. Oxidation occurs in the presence of labile functional groups sensitive to acids (pH < 7) or basis (pH > 7). The oxidation power of OXONE/acetone system is comparable with that of m-chloroperbenzoic acid (m-Cl-C6H4-C(O)OOH) [16,17]. Conversion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with OXONE to their oxides is possible e.g., 9–10 phenanthrene oxide is formed with 60% yield [18]. Epoxides are formed during oxidation with stronger oxidants [19,20] but the use of only OXONE in excess (1.5–2 equiv.) increases the yield to 95% [21,22]. Catalysts are not required during oxidation with OXONE for shortening of the reaction time, and the excess oxidant easily converts heterocyclic nitrogen compounds to their N-oxides [23]. Ylides are more sensitive in the reaction with OXONE than the compounds with carbon-carbon double bonds C=C. Even trisubstituted double bonds are not oxidized in bilayer benzene-water system [24], however, five and six-membered cycloalkenones lead to lactones [25] in dichloromethane and in the presence of wet aluminum oxide Al2O3 (yield up 80%). Moreover, organic quaternary ammonium salts are known as very strong antibacterial agents [26,27].
The potassium monopersulfate mixture 2KHSO5xKHSO4xK2SO4, known as OXONE, is commercially available. In the presence of ketones OXONE decomposes, but with acetone very reactive and unstable dioxirane structure (DMDO) is formed easily, as shown further, and oxidizes alkenes with excellent yields in dichloromethane-water biphasic system [15]. Oxidation occurs in the presence of labile functional groups sensitive to acids (pH < 7) or basis (pH > 7). The oxidation power of OXONE/acetone system is comparable with that of m-chloroperbenzoic acid (m-Cl-C6H4-C(O)OOH) [16,17]. Conversion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with OXONE to their oxides is possible e.g., 9–10 phenanthrene oxide is formed with 60% yield [18]. Epoxides are formed during oxidation with stronger oxidants [19,20] but the use of only OXONE in excess (1.5–2 equiv.) increases the yield to 95% [21,22]. Catalysts are not required during oxidation with OXONE for shortening of the reaction time, and the excess oxidant easily converts heterocyclic nitrogen compounds to their N-oxides [23]. Ylides are more sensitive in the reaction with OXONE than the compounds with carbon-carbon double bonds C=C. Even trisubstituted double bonds are not oxidized in bilayer benzene-water system [24], however, five and six-membered cycloalkenones lead to lactones [25] in dichloromethane and in the presence of wet aluminum oxide Al2O3 (yield up 80%). Moreover, organic quaternary ammonium salts are known as very strong antibacterial agents [26,27].
In the study, we have demonstrated that tetrabutylammonium salt of OXONE (TBA-OXONE) is a very efficient disinfection agent for cotton fabric. This compound was not used previously for such a purpose. Disinfection with TBA-OXONE ensured the microbiological purity of the cotton fabric despite the shortening of the industrial washing cycle with respect to the widely used standard procedure. Moreover, the use of TBA-OXONE did not markedly deteriorate the mechanical properties of the fabric.

2. Materials and Methods

The widely applied standard procedure of cotton fabric washing is The Christeyns Laundry Procedure [28] in water with Power Classic, which comprises two prewashing steps at 45 °C, four washing steps at 65 °C, and three rinsing steps, for 5 min each, then pressing for 3 min to decrease the amount of water, and drying at 120–140 °C, followed by ironing at 180 °C for 30–60 s. The procedure is additionally explained in Supplementary Information (SI). The washing machine Tunel Vega P9/40 is used for this purpose. Such a long washing with the above-mentioned agent causing very low pH (about 1) of the bath is time and energy consuming and leads to deterioration of the mechanical properties of cotton fabrics.
To shorten the washing, disinfection agents were prepared and used. The microbial purity of disinfected fabric samples was tested, which enabled to select the effective agent. The cotton fabric samples were then disinfected and washed, and the effect of the number of disinfection and washing cycles on their microbiological purity was tested as well as on the mechanical properties.

2.1. Materials

White plain weave cotton fabric, commercially available, with a surface density of 200 g/m2, warp and weft density 264/10 cm and 308/10 cm, respectively, was used in the study. All reagents and solvents used were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich: potassium monopersulfate mixture 2KHSO5xKHSO4xK2SO4 known as OXONE (purity 98%), tetran-butylammonium hydrosulfate (nBu4NHSO4) (purity 98%), dichloromethane anhydrous (CH2Cl2) (purity 99.8%) and acetone laboratory reagent (purity 99.5%).
The following disinfection agents were prepared: I—0.8% solution of OXONE in water, II, III—0.2% and 0.4% solutions of triple salt of OXONE (TBA-OXONE) (nBu4N+)5x2HSO5-xHSO4-xSO4−2 in dichloromethane, respectively. TBA-OXONE was synthesized in the reaction between OXONE and nBu4NHSO4 in a dichloromethane solution according to the described procedure [29,30,31,32]. The details of the synthesis of TBA-OXONE are given in SI.

2.2. Treatment of Fabric

The fabrics were sprayed with 15 mL/m2 of the disinfection agents and dried in air. Then, they were sprayed with acetone, prewashed, washed, rinsed, dried, pressed, and ironed similarly to the standard procedure described above. However, each of the prewashing, washing, and rinsing steps was shortened from 5 min to 3.5 min, which amounts to approx. 31 min in total.

2.3. Testing of Fabric

After the treatment with disinfection agents, the microbiological purity of the fabric samples was tested to verify the effectiveness of the sterilization process. Swabs taken from the fabric surfaces, using a phosphate buffer, were placed in test tubes filled with tryptic soya agar. Next, the agar was incubated at 36 °C ± 2 °C for 24–48 h ± 2 h, and the clarity of the agar in the test tubes was examined.
To examine the effect of the disinfection process on the mechanical properties of the fabric, the tensile test and the tearing test were carried out at room conditions. The shape of the specimens and their location in the fabric samples conformed to PN-EN ISO 13934-1:2013 and PN-EN ISO 13937-2:2002 standards, respectively. Instron 5582 machine was used for the purpose. The fabrics disinfected and washed 30 (P30), 60 (P60), 90 (P90), and 120 (P120) times, and the untreated fabric (P0), were examined. For the tensile tests rectangular specimens 50 mm wide, with a length exceeding 200 mm, were cut out, with their longer sides parallel either to the warp or to the weft directions. The specimens were gripped 200 mm apart, whereas a drawing rate was 20 mm/min, i.e., 10%/min. Values of force at break and strain at break were determined from the recorded force–strain dependencies. At least five specimens of each type were drawn for each fabric sample to calculate the average values of the mechanical parameters. For the tearing test, the trouser-shaped rectangular samples, with the same sizes as for the tensile tests were cut out. They were cut parallel to the longer side to form 25 mm wide trouser legs, the slit ending at 100 mm from the shorter specimen side. Both legs were gripped at the same distance from the slit end, and drawn at 100 mm/min. According to PN-EN ISO 13937-2:2002 standard, each force–strain plot was divided into four equal parts, beginning with the first peak of force and ending with the last peak. In each case, the force values of all force peaks, for which the increase and decrease of the force was at least 10%, in the second, third and fourth intervals were determined, and the average value of force was calculated. At least five specimens of each type were tested for each fabric sample and the values of tearing force calculated for each specimen were averaged.
Moreover, the untreated fabric (P0) and the fabric disinfected and washed 120 times were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) JEOL 6010LA (Tokyo, Japan), at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. Before the examination, the fabric samples were vacuum sputtered with a 10 nm gold layer using Quorum EMS150R ES from Quorum Technologies (Laughton, UK).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the results of the microbiological purity examination of the fabric samples. The turbidity of the agar in the test tubes is evidence of bacterial growth. The agar became turbid in the test tube with the swab taken from the fabric, which was not disinfected. On the contrary, the agar in the other three test tubes remained transparent. However, a more detailed examination of the agar in the tube with the swab taken from the sample disinfected with OXONE showed the presence of some bacterial colonization. Only the swabs taken from the samples disinfected with TBA-OXONE did not infect the agar, which remained clear after 48 h of incubation. It is worth noting that OXONE at a concentration of 0.8% did not show satisfactory antibacterial activity, as seen in Figure 1, whereas TBA-OXONE was efficient at a concentration of twice (0.4%) and four times (0.2%) lower.
There was the possibility that the number of disinfection and washing cycles can influence the disinfection efficiency, and after many cycles microorganisms would accumulate on the fabric surface. Hence, we repeated the disinfection and washing cycles 15, 30, 60, 80, 90, and 120 times. No microorganisms were detected on all fabric samples disinfected with TBA-OXONE regardless of the number of cycles.
The mechanism of activity of OXONE and TBA-OXONE as disinfection agents is shown in Figure 2. In the first case (Figure 2a), the active element is the oxygen radical resulting from the decomposition of dimethyloxirane formed in situ in the reaction between OXONEs and acetone. In the second one (Figure 2b), in addition to oxygens, a strong oxidant antibacterial ammonium group is also present. For the disinfecting activity, a combination of antibacterial and oxidative properties is beneficial. During the reactions, dimethyloxirane (DMDO) was formed [33,34]. The low concentration (below 1%) of in situ generated DMDO is very important because the pure agent is explosive.
0.2% concentration of TBA-OXONE in dichloromethane was sufficient. Thus, the mechanical properties of the fabrics treated with this agent and washed were tested. The results obtained for the fabrics disinfected and washed 30 (P30), 60 (P60), 90 (P90), and 120 (P120) times, and the untreated fabric (P0), are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4.
The dependence of force at break and strain at break on the number of disinfection and washing cycles of the tested fabric samples is shown in Figure 3. It can be seen that the force at break during drawing in the warp and weft direction decreased from 510 to 430 N and from 480 to 390 N, respectively, with increasing number of cycles. Thus, the decrease of the force at break did not exceed 15 and 20%, respectively. In turn, the strain at break during drawing in the warp and weft direction varied within the ranges of 19–25% and 20–16%, respectively, without a clear dependence on the number of cycles. The dependence of tearing force on the number of disinfection and washing cycles is shown in Figure 4. The tearing force showed a tendency to decrease slightly with increasing number of cycles, from 7.7–7.6 N to 7.0 N, that is by 10% after 120 cycles. It can be concluded that the disinfection and washing cycles did not significantly deteriorate the mechanical properties of the fabric. It is worth mentioning that a slight decrease in the strength of cotton fabric solely due to the antibacterial treatment was also observed by others [35].
SEM micrographs of the untreated fabric (P0) and the fabric disinfected and washed 120 times (P120) are compared in Figure 5. It is seen that 120 disinfection and washing cycles resulted in the damage of some fibers on the thread surfaces, which correlates with the slight decrease of mechanical performance.

4. Conclusions

OXONE and TBA-OXONE were tested as disinfection agents for cotton fabric. Fabric samples were sprayed with the disinfection agents and next with acetone, before washing. The washing cycle was shortened with respect to the standard washing procedure. Evidence of microbial colonization was found on the fabric samples not disinfected or disinfected with an 0.8% solution of OXONE in water. However, the use of 0.2% and 0.4% solutions of TBA-OXONE in dichloromethane as disinfection agents permitted to impart of antibacterial activity to the fabric and ensured its microbiological purity. The microbiological purity remained after disinfection with of 0.2% solution of TBA-OXONE in dichloromethane and industrial washing. This result was achieved despite the shortening of the washing cycle with respect to the widely used standard washing procedure. The shortening of the cycle by approx. 30 min allowed to save washing time and energy. Moreover, the mechanical properties of the fabric, the force and strain at break during drawing, and the tearing force were not significantly decreased even after 120 disinfection and washing cycles.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma15217749/s1. Standard washing procedure of cotton fabric, Synthesis of TBA-OXONE.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.B.; methodology, B.B., T.M.,P.S., D.K., I.S. and P.P.-S.; formal analysis, B.B., E.P., T.M. and J.D.; investigation, B.B., D.K., P.S., I.S. and P.P.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, B.B., E.P., T.M., P.S. and J.D.; writing—review and editing, B.B., E.P., visualization, P.S. and T.M.; supervision, B.B., J.D. and E.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Acknowledgments for the financial support of PPHU ATU SERVICE Poland. The statutory funds of CMMS PAS are acknowledged for supporting the research.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Original data may be provided by the corresponding author in justified cases.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Izabela Olczak, from the County Sanitary and Epidemiological Station in Lodz for conducting microbiological tests and providing valuable advice. The statutory funds of CMMS PAS are acknowledged for supporting the research. The financial support from PPHU ATU SERVICE Poland is also acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gao, S.; Su, J.; Wang, W.; Fu, J.; Wang, H. Highly efficient and durable antibacterial cotton fabrics finished with zwitterionic polysulfobetaine by one-step eco-friendly strategy. Cellulose 2021, 28, 1139–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rehan, M.; El-Naggar, M.E.; Mashaly, H.M.; Wilken, R. Nanocomposites based on chitosan/silver/clay for durable multi-functional properties of cotton fabrics. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 182, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Makowski, T.; Svyntkivska, M.; Piorkowska, E.; Mizerska, U.; Fortuniak, W.; Kowalczyk, D.; Brzezinski, S.; Kregiel, D. Antibacterial Electroconductive Composite Coating of Cotton Fabric. Materials 2022, 15, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dhiman, G.; Chakraborty, J.N. Antimicrobial performance of cotton finished with triclosan, silver and chitosan. Fash. Text 2015, 2, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Shahid-ul-Islam; Butola, B.S. A synergistic combination of shrimp shell derived chitosan polysaccharide with Citrus. sinensis peel extract for the development of colourful and bioactive cellulosic textile. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 158, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lim, S.-H.; Hudson, S.M. Review of Chitosan and Its Derivatives as Antimicrobial Agents and Their Uses as Textile Chemicals. J. Macromol. Sci. Part C 2003, 43, 223–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mizerska, U.; Fortuniak, W.; Makowski, T.; Svyntkivska, M.; Piorkowska, E.; Kowalczyk, D.; Brzezinski, S.; Kregiel, D. Antibacterial electroconductive rGO modified cotton fabric. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2021, 32, 3975–3981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, J.; Dong, C.; Wei, D.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, W.; Li, Q.; Lu, Z. Multifunctional Antibacterial and Hydrophobic Cotton Fabrics Treated with Cyclic Polysiloxane Quaternary Ammonium Salt. Fibers Polym. 2019, 20, 1368–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, S.; Xu, D.; Zhu, P.; Jiang, Z. Facile fabrication of antibacterial and fire-safety multifunctional cotton fabric with a triazine-phosphonate N-halamine. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 186, 115261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Y.; He, Q.; Li, R.; Huang, D.; Ren, X.; Huang, T.-S. Durable antimicrobial cotton fabrics treated with a novel N-halamine compound. Fibers Polym. 2016, 17, 2035–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schindler, W.D.; Hauser, P.J. Chemical Finishing of Textiles; Woodhead Publishing Ltd.: Cambridge, UK; CRC Press LLC: Cambridge, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  12. Disinfection Preparations Intended for Use in Health Care Departments. Available online: https://www-new.pzh.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Preparaty_przeznaczone_do_dezynfekcji_ZOZ.pdf (accessed on 17 October 2022).
  13. Safety Data Sheet of Clovin II Septon. Available online: http://fart-chem.pl/files/files/CLOVIN_II_Septon_biob_kch_akt_10.2016_CLP.pdf (accessed on 17 October 2022).
  14. Kennedy, R.J.; Stock, A.M. The Oxidation of Organic Substances by Potassium Peroxymonosulfate. J. Org. Chem. 1960, 25, 1901–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Adam, W.; Bialas, J.; Hadjiarapoglou, L. Kurzmitteilung/Short Communication A Convenient Preparation of Acetone Solutions of Dimethyldioxirane. Chem. Ber. 1991, 124, 2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cicala, G.; Curci, R.; Fiorentino, M.; Laricchiuta, O. Stereo- and Regioselectivities in the Epoxidation of Some Allylic Alcohols by the Dioxirane Intermediate Generated in the Reaction of Potassium Caroate with Acetone. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 2670–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Curci, R.; Fiorentino, M.; Troisi, L.; Edwards, J.O.; Pater, R.H. Epoxidation of Alkenes by Dioxirane Intermediates Generated in the Reaction of Potassium Caroate with Ketones. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 4758–4760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jeyaraman, R.; Murray, R.W. Production of Arene Oxides by the Caroate-Acetone System (Dimethyldioxirane). J. Am. Chem Soc. 1984, 106, 2462–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Krief, A.; Dumont, W.; Denis, J.-N. Novel Functional Group Transformations Involving Alkyl Phenyl Selenones. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1985, 9, 571–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Krief, A.; Dumont, W.; Denis, J.-N.; Evrard, G.; Norberg, B. Synthesis of Selenones: A Comparative Study. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1985, 9, 569–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gianni, M.H.; Prezzavento, B.; Shea, K. Conformational Analysis of 1,3-Dioxacycloheptanes. 5. Conformations of 4-Isopropyl-3,5-dioxabicyclo [5.n.0]alkanes. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1554–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bloch, R.; Abecassis, J.; Hassan, D. Epoxidation of Alkenes with Potassium Hydrogen Persulfate. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1544–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, Y.H.; Lim, S.C.; Chang, H.S. Activation of Superoxide; Efficient Desulfurization of Thioamides to the Corresponding Amides using a Peroxyphosphorus Intermediate generated from Phenylphosphonic Dichloride and Superoxide. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Comm. 1990, 1, 36–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wasserman, H.H.; Rotello, V.M.; Williams, D.R.; Benbow, J.W. Synthesis of the “Tricarbonyl” Region of FK-506 through an Amidophosphorane. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 2785–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hirano, M.; Oose, M.; Morimoto, T. A Novel Synthesis of Lactones by the Oxidation of Alicyclic Ketones with Oxone in Aprotic-Solvent in the Presence of “Wet-Alumina”. Chem. Lett. 1991, 20, 331–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kregiel, D.; Berlowska, J.; Mizerska, U.; Fortuniak, W.; Chojnowski, J.; Ambroziak, W. Chemical modification of polyvinyl chloride and silicone elastomer in inhibiting adhesion of Aeromonas hydrophila. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 29, 1197–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Fortuniak, W.; Mizerska, U.; Chojnowski, J.; Basinska, T.; Slomkowski, S.; Chehimi, M.M.; Konopacka, A.; Turecka, K.; Werel, W. Polysiloxanes With Quaternary Ammonium Salt Biocidal Functions and Their Behavior When Incorporated Into a Silicone Elastomer Network. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 2011, 21, 576–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. The Christeyns Laundry Procedure. Available online: https://www.christeyns.com/industries/professional-textile-care/industrial-laundries/ (accessed on 8 September 2022).
  29. Annunziata, R.; Cinquini, M.; Cozzi, F.; Raimondi, L. Stereoselective Intramolecular Nitrone Cycloadditions Promoted by an Allylic Stereocenter. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 1901–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cosstick, R.; Vyle, J.S. Solid phase synthesis of oligonucleotides containing 3′-thiothymidine. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 4693–4696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jung, J.C.; Choi, H.C.; Kim, Y.H. Direct Facile Tetrahydrofuranylation of Alcohols through Radical Coupling with (Bu4N)2S2O8. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 3581–3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Travis, B.R.; Ciaramitaro, B.P.; Borhan, B. Preparation of Purified KHSO5·H2O and nBu4NHSO5 from Oxone by Simple and Efficient Methods. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 2002, 3429–3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Adam, W.; Chan, Y.Y.; Cremer, D.; Gauss, J.; Scheutzow, D.; Schindler, M. Spectral and Chemical Properties of Dimethyldioxirane as Determined by Experiment and ab Initio Calculations. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 2800–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lohse, A.G.; Krenske, E.H.; Antoline, J.E.; Houk, K.N.; Hsung, R.P. Regioselectivities of (4+3) Cycloadditions between Furans and Oxazolidinone-Substituted Oxyallyls. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5506–5509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cheng, X.; Li, R.; Li, X.; Umair, M.M.; Ren, X.; Huang, T. Preparation and characterization of antimicrobial cotton fabrics via N-halamine chitosan derivative/poly(2-acrylamide-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid sodium salt) self-assembled composite films. J. Ind. Text. 2016, 46, 1039–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Analysis of microbiological purity of cotton fabric samples: (a) test tubes with agar after incubation, (b) photographs of the agar from the test tubes after incubation. Fabric sample not disinfected (I), fabric samples disinfected with 0.8% of OXONE (II); 0.2% TBA-OXONE (III); IV 0.4% TBA-OXONE (IV).
Figure 1. Analysis of microbiological purity of cotton fabric samples: (a) test tubes with agar after incubation, (b) photographs of the agar from the test tubes after incubation. Fabric sample not disinfected (I), fabric samples disinfected with 0.8% of OXONE (II); 0.2% TBA-OXONE (III); IV 0.4% TBA-OXONE (IV).
Materials 15 07749 g001
Figure 2. The comparison of the mechanisms of activity of two disinfecting agents: (a) OXONE, and (b) TBA-OXONE.
Figure 2. The comparison of the mechanisms of activity of two disinfecting agents: (a) OXONE, and (b) TBA-OXONE.
Materials 15 07749 g002
Figure 3. Dependencies of force and strain at break on number of disinfection and washing cycles of cotton fabric.
Figure 3. Dependencies of force and strain at break on number of disinfection and washing cycles of cotton fabric.
Materials 15 07749 g003
Figure 4. Dependence of tearing force on number of disinfection and washing cycles of cotton fabric.
Figure 4. Dependence of tearing force on number of disinfection and washing cycles of cotton fabric.
Materials 15 07749 g004
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of cotton fabric samples: (a) untreated (P0), and (b) disinfected and washed 120 times (P120).
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of cotton fabric samples: (a) untreated (P0), and (b) disinfected and washed 120 times (P120).
Materials 15 07749 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bujnicki, B.; Sowinski, P.; Makowski, T.; Krasowska, D.; Pokora-Sobczak, P.; Shkyliuk, I.; Drabowicz, J.; Piorkowska, E. Microbiologically Pure Cotton Fabrics Treated with Tetrabutylammonium OXONE as Mild Disinfection Agent. Materials 2022, 15, 7749. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15217749

AMA Style

Bujnicki B, Sowinski P, Makowski T, Krasowska D, Pokora-Sobczak P, Shkyliuk I, Drabowicz J, Piorkowska E. Microbiologically Pure Cotton Fabrics Treated with Tetrabutylammonium OXONE as Mild Disinfection Agent. Materials. 2022; 15(21):7749. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15217749

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bujnicki, Bogdan, Przemyslaw Sowinski, Tomasz Makowski, Dorota Krasowska, Patrycja Pokora-Sobczak, Inna Shkyliuk, Józef Drabowicz, and Ewa Piorkowska. 2022. "Microbiologically Pure Cotton Fabrics Treated with Tetrabutylammonium OXONE as Mild Disinfection Agent" Materials 15, no. 21: 7749. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15217749

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop