Next Article in Journal
Microstructural Characterization of Additively Manufactured Metal Components Using Linear and Nonlinear Ultrasonic Techniques
Next Article in Special Issue
Colossal Permittivity Characteristics of (Nb, Si) Co-Doped TiO2 Ceramics
Previous Article in Journal
Theoretical Prediction of Structures and Properties of 2,4,6-Trinitro-1,3,5-Triazine (TNTA) Green Energetic Materials from DFT and ReaxFF Molecular Modeling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Additives on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Alumina Ceramics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 11
10.3390/ma15113875
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dual-Scale Porosity Alumina Structures Using Ceramic/Camphene Suspensions Containing Polymer Microspheres

by
Hyun Lee
1,†,
Jong-Won Jeon
2,3,†,
Young-Hag Koh
2,3,* and
Hyoun-Ee Kim
4
1
Institute of Global Health Technology Research, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea
2
School of Biomedical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea
3
Interdisciplinary Program in Precision Public Health, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea
4
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Materials 2022, 15(11), 3875; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113875
Submission received: 29 April 2022 / Revised: 23 May 2022 / Accepted: 26 May 2022 / Published: 29 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue High-Performance Structural Ceramics and Hybrid Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study demonstrates the utility of thermo-regulated phase separable alumina/camphene suspensions containing poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) microspheres as porogens for the production of multi-scale porosity structures. The homogeneous suspension prepared at 60 °C could undergo phase separation during freezing at room temperature. This process resulted in the 3D networks of camphene crystals and alumina walls containing PMMA microspheres. As a consequence, relatively large dendritic pores with several tens of microns size could be created as the replica of frozen camphene crystals. In addition, after the removal of PMMA microspheres via heat-treatment, micron-sized small spherical pores could be generated in alumina walls. As the PMMA content with respect to the alumina content increased from 0 vol% to 40 vol%, while the camphene content in the suspensions was kept constant (70 vol%), the overall porosity increased from 45.7 ± 0.5 vol% to 71.4 ± 0.5 vol%. This increase in porosity is attributed to an increase in the fraction of spherical pores in the alumina walls. Thus, compressive strength decreased from 153 ± 18.3 MPa to 33 ± 7.2 MPa. In addition, multi-scale porosity alumina objects with a honeycomb structure comprising periodic hexagonal macrochannels surrounded by dual-scale porosity walls were constructed using a 3D plotting technique.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Porous ceramics can find very useful applications in diverse fields. For example, they can be used as lightweight structural components with high specific strengths and stiffness, scaffolds for bone regeneration [1,2,3,4], filters [5,6,7], thermal insulators [8,9], and electrical components [10,11,12]. Fundamentally, the characteristics of porous structures (i.e., porosity, pore size, pore geometry, pore interconnectivity, and pore size distribution) play key roles in the functions of porous ceramics [13]. In this regard, special attention has been paid to the creation of multiple pores at different length scales, in order to offer significantly enhanced mechanical functions at given porosities [14,15,16,17]. In particular, when used as bone scaffolds, macropores can provide favorable spaces for bone ingrowth and micropores in ceramic walls can stimulate bone regeneration [18,19,20].
In the manufacture of porous ceramics, the freeze casting of ceramic suspensions has demonstrated great advances, owing to its simplicity in processing and great ability to tailor the porosity and pore size [21,22,23,24,25,26]. More specifically, ceramic suspensions, comprising fine ceramic particles, freezing vehicle (e.g., water and camphene), and dispersant, are cast into molds below the melting point of the freezing vehicle. After this, the frozen objects are freeze-dried to remove frozen crystals. The green objects can be then sintered at a high temperature to densify ceramic walls. This approach can create three-dimensionally interconnected pores with tunable pore sizes, which are hardly obtainable using traditional manufacturing techniques (e.g., porogen leaching and sponge replication techniques) [13]. In addition, several approaches have been proposed to manufacture dual-scale porosity ceramics comprised of large pores surrounded by microporous ceramic walls. For example, micropores can be readily obtained by inducing necking between particles after partial sintering [27]. Two-stage freeze casting can create lamellar microstructures with interlamellar bridges [28]. The use of short fibers as a building block for freeze casting can create fibrous walls [29]. Freeze casting coupled with a carbothermal reduction process can create nanofibrous walls surrounding large lamellar pores [30,31]. In addition, ceramic/camphene (C10H16) suspensions can be frozen at room temperature because of the relatively high melting point of camphene (~48 °C) [32,33,34]. Thus, frozen ceramic compounds can be used as a feedstock for 3D printing, such as digital light processing [35] and UV-curing assisted 3D plotting [36,37]. These approaches can manufacture dual-scale porosity ceramics comprised of relatively large pores separated by porous ceramic walls. However, interconnectivity between pores created as the replica of camphene crystals and overall porosity need to be improved, in order to widen their applications.
Thus, we herein employed poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) microspheres as a supplementary pore-forming agent in camphene-based freeze casting for the manufacture of dual-scale porosity ceramic structures. Basically, polymeric microspheres have been widely used to produce porous ceramics, since they can be readily removed by heat-treatment [38,39,40,41]. However, little attention has been paid to the utilization of polymeric microspheres in freeze casting presumably due to the potential segregation of polymeric microspheres with relative low density during freezing. We specially employed a PMMA polymer, since it is stable in molten camphene [42]. It should be noted that polystyrene (PS) is not applicable to camphene-based freeze casting because of its solubility in molten camphene [43]. In addition, PMMA microspheres with several microns were used, in order to induce effective rejection by growing camphene crystals without segregation. We examined how the addition of PMMA microspheres would affect the freezing behavior of alumina/camphene suspensions prepared at 60 °C and generation of dual-scale porosity. The effect of PMMA content on the overall porosity and compressive strength - of dual-scale porosity alumina ceramics was examined. In addition, the effect of camphene content at a given PMMA content was examined. In order to demonstrate the utility of alumina/camphene suspensions containing PMMA porogen, multi-scale porosity structures were also constructed using a 3D plotting technique.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Starting Materials

Table 1 summarizes the components of an alumina suspension prepared using camphene as a thermo-regulated phase separable vehicle (i.e., freezing vehicle) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) microspheres as a porogen. All components were used as received.

2.2. Freeze Casting of Alumina Suspensions

Alumina suspensions were prepared by mixing alumina particles, PMMA microspheres, and dispersant with molten camphene at 60 °C by ball-milling for 24 h. To control the overall porosity and porous structure of dual-scale porosity alumina objects, various PMMA contents (0 vol%, 20 vol%, 30 vol%, and 40 vol%) with respect to the alumina content were employed, while the same camphene content (70 vol%) with respect to the alumina/PMMA content was used for all suspensions (Table 2). In a similar way, two different camphene contents (60 vol% and 80 vol%) with the same PMMA content (30 vol%) were also prepared.
Prior to freeze casting, polyethylene (PE) molds with a diameter of ~6.3 mm were cooled at −20 °C, in order to induce the rapid solidification of alumina suspensions at room temperature. Alumina suspensions prepared at 60 °C were poured into the cool PE molds. After that, the solidified samples were removed from the PE molds. The diameter and height of the samples were ~6.3 mm and ~8.4 mm, respectively. In addition, honeycomb structures composed of periodic hexagonal macrochannels surrounded by dual-scale porosity alumina walls were constructed using a 3D plotting technique similar to the ceramic/camphene-based 3D extrusion process [44]. To this end, an alumina suspension was cast prepared at 60 °C into a metallic mold with an inner diameter of 10 mm, and then frozen at room temperature. The frozen feedstock was then extruded through a 1 mm diameter at a constant extrusion speed of 120 mm/min (Figure 1A). The extruded filaments were then deposited at a constant speed of 110 mm/min according to a predetermined build path (Figure 1B).
The green samples were freeze-dried to remove camphene crystals. Thereafter, the porous green bodies were slowly heat-treated, particularly in the temperature range of 400 °C–600 °C, in order to carefully remove PMMA microspheres, and then finally sintered at 1550 °C for 3 h, in order to densify alumina walls.

2.3. Porous Structure and Microstructure Evaluations

The sintering shrinkages of dual-scale porosity alumina structures produced using various PMMA and camphene contents were computed by measuring their diameters before and after sintering. The densities of the sintered objects were calculated by measuring their mass and volume. Relative density and overall porosity were computed by considering the theoretical density of alumina (3.97 g/cm3). Porous structures and microstructures of the green and sintered objects were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; JSM-6701F, JEOL Techniques, Tokyo, Japan).

2.4. Compressive Strength Tests

Mechanical properties of the dual-scale porosity alumina structures produced using various PMMA and camphene contents were characterized using a universal testing machine (Instron 5582, Instron Corp., Canton, MA, USA). Samples of ~5.2 mm in diameter and ~7.0 mm height were compressed at a constant crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. During the tests, compressive loads were recorded as a function of displacement. Compressive strengths of the samples were computed by considering their peak load and cross-sectional area. Five samples were tested for each condition, in order to obtain the mean value and deviation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of PMMA Addition on Pore Structure and Microstructure of Green Objects

In this study, we investigated the utility of thermo-regulated phase separable alumina/camphene suspensions containing PMMA microspheres as a supplementary pore-forming agent for the production of multi-scale porosity structures. PMMA polymer was specially employed, since it would not dissolve in molten camphene [42] unlike polystyrene (PS) [43]. Fundamentally, our approach adopts the principle of camphene-based ceramic freeze casting [33]. More specifically, when placed below the melting point of camphene (~42 °C), alumina suspensions can undergo phase separation, resulting in a three-dimensional network of camphene crystals, surrounded by walls composed of alumina particles and PMMA microspheres. Thus, large interconnected dendritic pores can be created by the removal of camphene crystals via freeze-drying, while relatively small spherical pores can be generated in alumina walls by the removal of PMMA microspheres via heat treatment [38,39,40].
To examine the effect of PMMA addition on the development of dual-scale porosity structures, four kinds of alumina/camphene suspensions with various PMMA contents (Table 2)—0 vol%, 20 vol%, 30 vol%, and 40 vol% with respect to the alumina content—were prepared at 60 °C. The prepared suspensions were then cast into cool PE molds, followed by solidification at room temperature. After freeze-drying for the removal of camphene crystals, the porous structures and microstructure of the green samples were characterized by FE-SEM, as shown in Figure 2A–H. Without PMMA addition, the sample showed the typical porous structure of a freeze-cast ceramic body (Figure 2A). Interconnected pores with high aspect ratios were created as the replica of camphene crystals that had grown dendritically along the direction of heat conduction [43,45].
Alumina particles were highly concentrated (Figure 2E), which would result in highly densified alumina walls after sintering. In addition, all samples produced using PMMA addition showed highly porous structures (Figure 2B–D). This finding suggests that PMMA addition did not hinder the dendritic growth of camphene crystals during freezing. However, interestingly, PMMA addition resulted in larger dendritic pores, and the size increased slightly with the increase in PMMA content. Although a further study is required, it is reasonable to suppose that the size of camphene crystals is limited when the force generated by packed particles starts to exceed the force generated by the growing crystal to push particles [46]. Thus, PMMA microspheres with much lower density and larger size (a size range of 0.3–6.55 μm used in this study) than alumina particles could be more easily pushed by growing camphene crystals. This resulted in larger dendritic pores. All samples produced with PMMA addition showed highly concentrated walls, composed of alumina particles surrounding PMMA microspheres that are indicated by the yellow arrows (Figure 2F–H). More PMMA microspheres were observed for the higher initial PMMA content added into suspensions. This finding suggests that, during the dendritic growth of camphene crystals, PMMA microspheres added into alumina suspensions could be effectively pushed with alumina particles without segregation.

3.2. Dual-Scale Pore Structures of Sintered Objects

Green objects produced using various PMMA contents (0 vol%, 20 vol%, 30 vol%, and 40 vol%) were carefully heat-treated particularly at the temperature range of 400 °C–600 °C to remove PMMA microspheres, followed by sintering at 1550 °C for 3 h. Sintering shrinkage decreased from 17.8 ± 0.4% to 15.3 ± 0.7 vol% with the increase in PMMA content from 0 vol% to 30 vol% (Table 3). However, a very small change was observed for higher PMMA content (40 vol%). This was attributed to the reduction in the fraction of alumina walls required for densification.
Figure 3A–H show representative FE-SEM images of sintered objects. Without PMMA addition, the sample showed the typical porous structure of a freeze-cast ceramic [33]. That is, a 3-dimensional network of dendritic pores was created as a replica of camphene crystals (Figure 3A). In addition, the alumina walls were almost fully densified (Figure 3E), which is attributed to the high packing density of alumina particles after phase separation. On the other hand, with PMMA addition, the objects showed two types of pores—relatively large dendritic pores and small pores in alumina walls (Figure 3B–D). The creation of spherical pores by the removal of PMMA microspheres is more clearly visible in Figure 3F–H. No noticeable defects were observed in the alumina walls. A higher PMMA content resulted in a more porous structure in the alumina walls. Such small pores are expected to enhance pore interconnectivity, which is useful for some applications. For examples, when used as bone scaffolds, they can provide excellent bone regeneration ability with reasonably high mechanical properties [19,20]. This finding suggests that a dual-scale porosity alumina structure could be constructed using a combination of camphene and PMMA microspheres. In other words, camphene as a thermo-regulated phase separable vehicle can construct a 3D dendritic pore network, while PMMA microspheres as a pore-forming agent can create small pores in the alumina walls.

3.3. Total Porosities of Dual-Scale Porosity Structures

Figure 4 show the total porosities (PT) of the dual-scale porosity structures produced using different PMMA contents (0 vol%, 20 vol%, 30 vol%, and 40 vol%), computed by measuring their weight and volume. Total porosity increased from 45.7 ± 0.5 vol% to 71.4 ± 0.5 vol% with an increase in PMMA content from 0 vol% to 40 vol%. A linear relationship between the total porosity and initial PMMA content, marked by the dashed line, can be observed. This finding suggests that most of the PMMA microspheres could be effectively pushed by camphene crystals without engulfment within camphene crystals, and thus PP can be readily tailored by adjusting the initial PMMA content in an alumina suspension, resulting in tunable PT.

3.4. Compressive Strengths of Dual-Scale Porosity Structures

The mechanical properties of dual-scale porosity alumina structures produced using different PMMA contents (0 vol%, 20 vol%, 30 vol%, and 40 vol%) were measured by compressive strength tests. Figure 5A shows the representative compressive stress versus the strain responses of samples. Without PMMA addition, the sample showed a rapid increase in stress with an increase in strain. After reaching the maximum value, it rapidly decreased, indicating the brittle fracture of the alumina walls [47,48]. The sample produced using the lowest PMMA content (20 vol%) showed a similar stress–strain curve. However, even after the maximum value, a retention of noticeable stress was observed. This tendency became more obvious with an increase in PMMA contents to 30 vol% and 40 vol%. This was attributed to the local fractures of the porous alumina walls. More specifically, some of the porous alumina walls were first fractured instead of an entire fracture occurring. Thus, the remaining alumina walls could to a certain extent withstand additional loads. Compressive strengths, computed from the peak loads observed, decreased from 152.9 ± 18.3 MPa to 32.6 ± 7.2 MPa with an increase in PMMA content from 0 vol% to 40 vol%, as shown in Figure 5B. These values are comparable to, or even higher than, those obtained for the porous alumina produced using camphene-based freeze casting [45,49]. This finding suggests the utility of dual-scale porosity structures compared to uniform porous structures.

3.5. Control over Dual-Scale Pore Structures by Camphene Content

To further tailor the porous structure and compressive strength of dual-scale porosity alumina structures, we examined the effect of camphene content, while the same PMMA content (30 vol% with respect to the alumina) was used. Figure 6A–D show representative FE-SEM images of green samples produced using different camphene contents (60 vol% and 80 vol%). Both samples showed highly porous structures without any notable defects in alumina walls (Figure 6A,B), while MMA microspheres, indicated by the red arrows, were well dispersed in the alumina walls (Figure 6C,D). However, a higher camphene content resulted in a higher pore fraction and larger pore size, which is often the case with camphene-based freeze casting [33].
Figure 7A–D show representative FE-SEM images of sintered alumina samples with a dual-scale porosity structure produced using different camphene contents (60 vol% and 80 vol%). Both samples showed highly porous structures (Figure 7A,B) composed of two kinds of pores, i.e., three-dimensional dendritic pores and small spherical pores, indicated by red arrows (Figure 7C,D).
The total porosities of samples produced using camphene contents of 60 vol% and 80 vol% were 55.6 ± 0.7 vol% and 76.3 ± 0.3 vol%, respectively. To interpret the effect of camphene content on the total porosity of the dual-scale porosity structures, Figure 8 plots the total porosities obtained using different camphene contents (60 vol%, 70 vol%, and 80 vol%). The total porosity (PT) was observed to increase almost linearly with an increase in camphene content (Vc), which can be described as follows:
PT = (1.03 × Vc) − 6.34
This linear relationship was attributed to the fact that since they used the same PMMA content (30 vol%), they could have a similar fraction of spherical pores, while the fraction of dendritic pores could increase linearly with an increase in camphene content. This finding suggests that total porosity can be readily tuned by adjusting the camphene content at a constant PMMA content.
Compressive strengths, computed from the peak loads observed, decreased from 92.1 ± 21.7 MPa to 13.0 ± 1.9 MPa with an increase in camphene content from 60 vol% to 80 vol%, as shown in Figure 9.

3.6. Overall Relationship between Total Porosity and Compressive Strength

The compressive strengths of the dual-scale porosity structures produced using camphene contents of 60 vol% and 80 vol% were 92.1 ± 21.7 MPa and 13.0 ± 1.9 MPa, respectively. To demonstrate the ability to tailor the total porosity and compressive strengths of the dual-scale porosity alumina structures produced using our approach, Figure 10 plots the compressive strengths obtained using different PMMA (20 vol%, 30 vol%, and 40 vol%) and camphene contents (60 vol%, 70 vol%, and 80 vol%) as a function of total porosity. As expected, the compressive strength decreased with an increase in total porosity. However, this reduction is not exponential [50], presumably due to the creation of dual-scale porosity. In addition, the sample with the lowest porosity (~55.6 vol%) obtained using a camphene content of 60 vol% with a PMMA content of 30 vol% showed a slightly lower compressive strength than that obtained using a higher camphene content of 70 vol% with a lower PMMA content of 20 vol%. This was attributed to the dual-scale porosity structures being more likely to fracture by large dendritic pores at given porosities. Thus, it is reasonable to suppose that the creation of dual-scale porosity can be one of the most promising approaches for the achievement of high porosities with reasonably high mechanical properties. Note that the measured compressive strengths are in the range of ~94.9–32.6 MPa, which is comparable to that of natural bones [2], and thus dual-scale porosity alumina structures can be used as bone scaffolds.

3.7. Feasibility as Feedstock for 3D Printing of Multi-Scale Porosity Structures

We examined the feasibility of an alumina/camphene suspension containing PMMA porogen as a feedstock for a 3D plotting process, in order to construct multi-scale porosity structures. To this end, frozen feedstock was extruded through a 1 mm diameter nozzle, and the extruded filaments were then deposited using our custom-made 3D plotter according to predetermined build paths. As a model, a honeycomb structure was manufactured. It was observed that the frozen feedstock, composed of camphene dendrites surrounded by alumina particles with PMMA microspheres, could be extruded without difficulty, owing to the good extrudability of camphene with soft wax-like behavior [44,51]. The produced sample showed a well-defined honeycomb structure even after sintering at 1550 °C for 3 h (Figure 11A). In addition, filaments were well bonded together without any noticeable defects. Two types of pores—relatively large and small pores due to the removal of camphene crystals and PMMA microspheres—were observed (Figure 11B,C). This new approach can allow for the creation of three different types of pores—periodic hexagonal macrochannels by 3D plotting process, highly elongated pores by camphene crystals, and small spherical pores by PMMA microspheres. This finding suggests that a variety of multi-scale porosity structures can be constructed.

4. Conclusions

Dual-scale porosity alumina structures could be constructed using a combination of camphene as a thermo-regulated phase separable vehicle and PMMA microspheres as a pore-forming agent in alumina suspensions, which could create three-dimensionally interconnected large dendritic pores and relatively small spherical pores in alumina walls, respectively. In addition, the overall porosity and compressive strength could be readily tailored simply by adjusting the PMMA and camphene contents. Reasonably high compressive strengths in the range of ~94.9–32.6 MPa could be obtained for high overall porosities (~60.3 vol%–~71.4 vol%) owing to the creation of dual-scale porosity. In addition, these newly formulated alumina suspensions could be utilized as a feedstock to manufacture multi-scale porosity structures using a 3D plotting process.

Author Contributions

H.L., J.-W.J., Y.-H.K. and H.-E.K. conceived and designed the experiments; H.L. and J.-W.J. fabricated the dual-scale porosity alumina structures and measured their porous structures and mechanical properties; H.L., J.-W.J., Y.-H.K. and H.-E.K. wrote the manuscript. All the authors contributed to the final editing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by supported by a Korea University Grant by Korea Unversity.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Islam, T.; Felfel, R.M.; Neel, E.A.A.; Grant, D.M.; Ahmed, I.; Hossain, K.M.Z. Bioactive calcium phosphate–based glasses and ceramics and their biomedical applications: A review. J. Tissue Eng. 2017, 8, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Hing, K.A. Bioceramic Bone Graft Substitutes: Influence of Porosity and Chemistry. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2005, 2, 184–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jeong, J.; Kim, J.H.; Shim, J.H.; Hwang, N.S.; Heo, C.Y. Bioactive calcium phosphate materials and applications in bone regeneration. Biomater. Res. 2019, 23, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Chafik, G.; Indranil, B.; Julien, G.; Mutlu, O.; Franz, E.W. 3D-printed HA-based scaffolds for bone regeneration: Microporosity, osteoconduction and osteoclastic resorption. Materials 2022, 15, 1433. [Google Scholar]
  5. Shafiquzzaman, M.; Al-Mahmud, A.; AlSaleem, S.S.; Haider, H. Application of a Low Cost Ceramic Filter for Recycling Sand Filter Backwash Water. Water 2018, 10, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Shivaraju, H.P.; Egumbo, H.; Madhusudan, P.; Kumar, K.M.A.; Midhun, G. Preparation of affordable and multifunctional clay-based ceramic filter matrix for treatment of drinking water. Environ. Technol. 2018, 40, 1633–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Liu, J.; Ren, B.; Chen, Y.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Rong, Y.; Yang, J. Novel design of alumina foams with three-dimensional reticular architecture for effective high-temperature particulate matter capture. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 102, 5576–5586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rajpoot, S.; Malik, R.; Kim, Y.-W. Effects of polysiloxane on thermal conductivity and compressive strength of porous silica ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 21270–21277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kultayeva, S.; Ha, J.-H.; Malik, R.; Kim, Y.-W.; Kim, K.J. Effects of porosity on electrical and thermal conductivities of porous SiC ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 996–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lu, X.; Taiwo, O.O.; Bertei, A.; Li, T.; Li, K.; Brett, D.J.L.; Shearing, P.R. Multi-length scale tomography for the determination and optimization of the effective microstructural properties in novel hierarchical solid oxide fuel cell anodes. J. Power Sources 2017, 367, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Du, Y.; Hedayat, N.; Panthi, D.; Ilkhani, H.; Emley, B.J.; Woodson, T. Freeze-casting for the fabrication of solid oxide fuel cells: A review. Materialia 2018, 1, 198–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hu, X.; Li, X.; Yan, K.; Qi, X.; Chen, W.; Wu, D. Fabrication of porous PZT ceramics using micro-stereolithography technology. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 32376–32381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Studart, A.R.; Gonzenbach, U.T.; Tervoort, E.; Gauckler, L.J. Processing Routes to Macroporous Ceramics: A Review. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 89, 1771–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Minas, C.; Carnelli, D.; Tervoort, E.; Studart, A.R. 3D Printing of Emulsions and Foams into Hierarchical Porous Ceramics. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 9993–9999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Muth, J.T.; Dixon, P.G.; Woish, L.; Gibson, L.J.; Lewis, J.A. Architected cellular ceramics with tailored stiffness via direct foam writing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 1832–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Maurath, J.; Willenbacher, N. 3D printing of open-porous cellular ceramics with high specific strength. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 37, 4833–4842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alison, L.; Menasce, S.; Bouville, F.; Tervoort, E.; Mattich, I.; Ofner, A.; Studart, A.R. 3D printing of sacrificial templates into hierarchical porous materials. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Liu, X.; Miao, Y.; Liang, H.; Diao, J.; Hao, L.; Shi, Z.; Zhao, N.; Wang, Y. 3D-printed bioactive ceramic scaffolds with biomimetic micro/nano-HAp surfaces mediated cell fate and promoted bone augmentation of the bone–implant interface in vivo. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 12, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Xiong, Y.; Dong, L.; Li, X. Development of hierarchical porous bioceramic scaffolds with controlled micro/nano surface topography for accelerating bone regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 130, 112437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maurice, N.C.; Guang, R.; Kieran, Y.; Pina, S.; Rui, L.; Reis, J.; Oliveira, M. Scaffold fabrication technologies and structure/function properties in bone tissue engineering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2010609. [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu, R.; Xu, T.; Wang, C.-A. A review of fabrication strategies and applications of porous ceramics prepared by freeze-casting method. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 2907–2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shao, G.; Hanaor, D.A.H.; Shen, X.; Gurlo, A. Freeze Casting: From Low-Dimensional Building Blocks to Aligned Porous Structures—A Review of Novel Materials, Methods, and Applications. Adv. Mater. 2020, 31, 1907176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Algharaibeh, S.; Ireland, A.J.; Su, B. Bi-directional freeze casting of porous alumina ceramics: A study of the effects of different processing parameters on microstructure. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 39, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Hou, Z.; Ye, F.; Liu, Q.; Liu, L.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, S. Pore architectures and mechanical properties of porous α-SiAlON ceramics fabricated via unidirectional freeze casting based on camphene-templating. Materials 2019, 12, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, N.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Du, Y.; Zhang, J. Control of pore structure during freeze casting of porous SiC ceramics by different freezing modes. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 11558–11563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lloreda-Jurado, P.J.; Pérez-Soriano, E.M.; Paúl, A.; Herguido, J.; Peña, J.A.; Sepúlveda, R. Doped iron oxide scaffolds with gradient porosity fabricated by freeze casting: Pore morphology prediction and processing parameters. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 36, 1227–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Qi, Y.; Jiang, K.; Zhou, C.; Han, W.; Du, Z. Preparation and properties of high-porosity ZrB2-SiC ceramics by water-based freeze casting. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 41, 2239–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Arai, N.; Faber, K.T. Hierarchical porous ceramics via two-stage freeze casting of preceramic polymers. Scr. Mater. 2019, 162, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mukkavilli, R.S.; Papakollu, K.; Kumar, R. Microstructural transitions in camphene-based freeze casted ceria: Effect of primary building blocks. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2021, 120, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, X.; Yuan, J.; Ding, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhang, S.; Yang, J. Directly growing nanowire-assembled nanofibrous ceramic foams with multi-lamellar structure via freeze-casting process. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 1041–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, X.-Y.; Ding, Y.-J.; Wu, J.-M.; Liu, B.; Zhang, B.-L.; Zhang, S.-G. SiC–Si3N4 composite with multi-laminate nanowires originated from oriented porous structure by freeze-casting. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 26238–26243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Scotti, K.L.; Dunand, D.C. Freeze casting—A review of processing, microstructure and properties via the open data repository, FreezeCasting.net. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 94, 243–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Yoon, B.-H.; Koh, Y.-H.; Park, C.-S.; Kim, H.-E. Generation of Large Pore Channels for Bone Tissue Engineering Using Camphene-Based Freeze Casting. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2007, 90, 1744–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Liu, Y.; Zhu, W.; Guan, K.; Peng, C.; Wu, J. Freeze-casting of alumina ultra-filtration membranes with good performance for anionic dye separation. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 11901–11904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lee, J.-B.; Maeng, W.-Y.; Koh, Y.-H.; Kim, H.-E. Novel additive manufacturing of photocurable ceramic slurry containing freezing vehicle as porogen for hierarchical porous structure. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 21321–21327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Maeng, W.-Y.; Jeon, J.-W.; Lee, J.-B.; Lee, H.; Koh, Y.-H.; Kim, H.-E. Photocurable ceramic/monomer feedstocks containing terpene crystals as sublimable porogen for UV curing-assisted 3D plotting. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 3469–3477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jeon, J.W.; Maeng, W.Y.; Lee, H.; Koh, Y.H.; Kim, H.E. UV curing-assisted 3D plotting of core-shelled feedrod for macroporous hydroxyapatite scaffolds comprised of microporous hollow filaments. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 6729–6737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hao, B.L.; Lang, Y.; Bian, D.Q.; Wang, C.A. Preparation of near net size porous alumina-calcium aluminate ceramics by gelcasting-pore-forming agent processs. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 103, 4602–4610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, M.; Li, X.; Zhang, M.; Xiu, Z.; Li, J.-G.; Li, J.; Xie, M.; Chen, J.; Sun, X. High-strength macro-porous alumina ceramics with regularly arranged pores produced by gel-casting and sacrificial template methods. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 10119–10129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hooshmand, S.; Nordin, J.; Akhtar, F. Porous alumina ceramics by gel casting: Effect of type of sacrificial template on the properties. Int. J. Ceram. Eng. Sci. 2019, 1, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Parkhomchuk, E.; Fedotov, K.; Semeykina, V.; Lysikov, A. Polystyrene microsphere-template method for textural design of alumina—An effective catalyst support for macromolecule conversion. Catal. Today 2020, 353, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lee, Y.-H.; Lee, J.-W.; Yang, S.-Y.; Lee, H.; Koh, Y.-H.; Kim, H.-E. Dual-scale porous biphasic calcium phosphate gyroid scaffolds using ceramic suspensions containing polymer microsphere porogen for digital light processing. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 11285–11293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Koh, Y.-H.; Lee, E.-J.; Yoon, B.-H.; Song, J.-H.; Kim, H.-E.; Kim, H.-W. Effect of Polystyrene Addition on Freeze Casting of Ceramic/Camphene Slurry for Ultra-High Porosity Ceramics with Aligned Pore Channels. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 89, 3646–3653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Moon, Y.-W.; Shin, K.-H.; Koh, Y.-H.; Jung, H.-D.; Kim, H.-E. Three-dimensional Ceramic/Camphene-based Coextrusion for Unidirectionally Macrochanneled Alumina Ceramics with Controlled Porous Walls. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 97, 32–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yoon, B.-H.; Choi, W.-Y.; Kim, H.-E.; Kim, J.-H.; Koh, Y.-H. Aligned porous alumina ceramics with high compressive strengths for bone tissue engineering. Scr. Mater. 2008, 58, 537–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nelson, I.; Nalew, S.E. Intrinsic and extrinsic control of freeze casting. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 2372–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Seuba, J.; Deville, S.; Guizard, C.; Stevenson, A.J. Mechanical properties and failure behavior of unidirectional porous ceramics. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Deville, S. Freeze-Casting of Porous Biomaterials: Structure, Properties and Opportunities. Materials 2010, 3, 1913–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Choe, G.-B.; Kim, G.-N.; Lee, H.; Koh, Y.-H.; Kim, H.-E. Novel camphene/photopolymer solution as pore-forming agent for photocuring-assisted additive manufacturing of porous ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Meille, S.; Lombardi, M.; Chevalier, J.; Montanaro, L. Mechanical properties of porous ceramics in compression: On the transition between elastic, brittle, and cellular behavior. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 32, 3959–3967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Moon, Y.W.; Choi, I.J.; Koh, Y.H.; Kim, H.E. Macroporous alumina scaffolds consisting of highly microporous hollow filaments using three-dimensional ceramic/camphene-based co-extrusion. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 35, 4623–4627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 15 03875 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Custom-built 3D plotter used to manufacture a honeycomb structure and (B) design of a honeycomb structure.
Figure 1. (A) Custom-built 3D plotter used to manufacture a honeycomb structure and (B) design of a honeycomb structure.
Materials 15 03875 g001
Materials 15 03875 g002 550
Figure 2. Representative FE-SEM images of green objects produced using different PMMA contents: 0 vol% (A,E), 20 vol% (B,F), 30 vol% (C,G), and 40 vol% (D,H). The yellow arrows indicate PMMA microspheres in alumina walls.
Figure 2. Representative FE-SEM images of green objects produced using different PMMA contents: 0 vol% (A,E), 20 vol% (B,F), 30 vol% (C,G), and 40 vol% (D,H). The yellow arrows indicate PMMA microspheres in alumina walls.
Materials 15 03875 g002
Materials 15 03875 g003 550
Figure 3. Representative FE-SEM images of dual-scale porosity structures produced using different PMMA contents: 0 vol% (A,E), 20 vol% (B,F), 30 vol% (C,G), and 40 vol% (D,H). The yellow arrows indicate the pores created by the removal of PMMA microspheres via heat treatment.
Figure 3. Representative FE-SEM images of dual-scale porosity structures produced using different PMMA contents: 0 vol% (A,E), 20 vol% (B,F), 30 vol% (C,G), and 40 vol% (D,H). The yellow arrows indicate the pores created by the removal of PMMA microspheres via heat treatment.
Materials 15 03875 g003
Materials 15 03875 g004 550
Figure 4. Total porosities of dual-scale porosity structures as a function of PMMA content. The dashed line represents the computed relationship between the total porosity and initial PMMA content.
Figure 4. Total porosities of dual-scale porosity structures as a function of PMMA content. The dashed line represents the computed relationship between the total porosity and initial PMMA content.
Materials 15 03875 g004
Materials 15 03875 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) Representative compressive stress versus strain responses of the dual-scale porosity alumina structures produced using different PMMA contents (0 vol%, 20 vol%, 30 vol%, and 40 vol%) and (B) measured compressive strengths as a function of PMMA content.
Figure 5. (A) Representative compressive stress versus strain responses of the dual-scale porosity alumina structures produced using different PMMA contents (0 vol%, 20 vol%, 30 vol%, and 40 vol%) and (B) measured compressive strengths as a function of PMMA content.
Materials 15 03875 g005
Materials 15 03875 g006 550
Figure 6. Representative FE-SEM images of green alumina samples produced using different camphene contents: 60 vol% (A,C) and 80 vol% (B,D). The red arrows indicate the PMMA microspheres.
Figure 6. Representative FE-SEM images of green alumina samples produced using different camphene contents: 60 vol% (A,C) and 80 vol% (B,D). The red arrows indicate the PMMA microspheres.
Materials 15 03875 g006
Materials 15 03875 g007 550
Figure 7. Representative FE-SEM images of the sintered alumina samples with a dual-scale porosity structure produced using different camphene contents: 60 vol% (A,C) and 80 vol% (B,D). The red arrows indicate the pores created by the removal of the PMMA microspheres via heat treatment.
Figure 7. Representative FE-SEM images of the sintered alumina samples with a dual-scale porosity structure produced using different camphene contents: 60 vol% (A,C) and 80 vol% (B,D). The red arrows indicate the pores created by the removal of the PMMA microspheres via heat treatment.
Materials 15 03875 g007
Materials 15 03875 g008 550
Figure 8. Total porosities of the dual-scale porosity alumina structures as a function of camphene content.
Figure 8. Total porosities of the dual-scale porosity alumina structures as a function of camphene content.
Materials 15 03875 g008
Materials 15 03875 g009 550
Figure 9. Measured compressive strengths as a function of camphene content.
Figure 9. Measured compressive strengths as a function of camphene content.
Materials 15 03875 g009
Materials 15 03875 g010 550
Figure 10. Compressive strengths of dual-scale porosity alumina structures produced using different PMMA and camphene contents as a function of total porosity. The blue and red symbols represent the compressive strengths obtained from different PMMA and camphene contents, respectively.
Figure 10. Compressive strengths of dual-scale porosity alumina structures produced using different PMMA and camphene contents as a function of total porosity. The blue and red symbols represent the compressive strengths obtained from different PMMA and camphene contents, respectively.
Materials 15 03875 g010
Materials 15 03875 g011 550
Figure 11. (A) Representative optical image of a multi-scale porosity object with a honeycomb structure and FE-SEM images showing elongated pores created by the removal of camphene crystals at different magnifications (B,C).
Figure 11. (A) Representative optical image of a multi-scale porosity object with a honeycomb structure and FE-SEM images showing elongated pores created by the removal of camphene crystals at different magnifications (B,C).
Materials 15 03875 g011
Table
Table 1. Components of an alumina suspension prepared using camphene as a thermo-regulated phase separable vehicle (i.e., freezing vehicle) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) microspheres as a porogen.
Table 1. Components of an alumina suspension prepared using camphene as a thermo-regulated phase separable vehicle (i.e., freezing vehicle) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) microspheres as a porogen.
ComponentMaterial (Supplier)
Ceramic PowderAlumina (Kojundo Chemical Co., Ltd., Sakado, Japan)
Freezing VehicleCamphene (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)
PorogenPoly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) (Sunjin Beauty Science, Ansan-si, Korea)
DispersantHypermer KD-4 (UniQema, Everburg, Belgium)
Table
Table 2. Compositions of various alumina suspensions used to produce multi-scale porosity alumina structures with controlled porous structures.
Table 2. Compositions of various alumina suspensions used to produce multi-scale porosity alumina structures with controlled porous structures.
Camphene [vol%]PMMA [vol%]Alumina [vol%]KD4 [vol%]
PMMA Contents70.000.0027.572.43
70.006.0021.912.09
70.009.0019.081.92
70.0012.0016.251.75
Camphene Contents60.0012.0025.442.56
80.006.0012.721.28
Table
Table 3. Sintering shrinkages of dual-scale porosity structures produced using different PMMA contents (0 vol%, 20 vol%, 30 vol%, and 40 vol%).
Table 3. Sintering shrinkages of dual-scale porosity structures produced using different PMMA contents (0 vol%, 20 vol%, 30 vol%, and 40 vol%).
PMMA Content [vol%]0203040
Sintering shrinkage [%]17.8 ± 0.416.2 ± 0.715.3 ± 0.715.6 ± 1.0
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, H.; Jeon, J.-W.; Koh, Y.-H.; Kim, H.-E. Dual-Scale Porosity Alumina Structures Using Ceramic/Camphene Suspensions Containing Polymer Microspheres. Materials 2022, 15, 3875. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113875

AMA Style

Lee H, Jeon J-W, Koh Y-H, Kim H-E. Dual-Scale Porosity Alumina Structures Using Ceramic/Camphene Suspensions Containing Polymer Microspheres. Materials. 2022; 15(11):3875. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113875

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Hyun, Jong-Won Jeon, Young-Hag Koh, and Hyoun-Ee Kim. 2022. "Dual-Scale Porosity Alumina Structures Using Ceramic/Camphene Suspensions Containing Polymer Microspheres" Materials 15, no. 11: 3875. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113875

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop