Next Article in Journal
Surface Structure of Zirconia Implants: An Integrative Review Comparing Clinical Results with Preclinical and In Vitro Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Genipin-Crosslinked Gelatin/Chitosan-Based Functional Films Incorporated with Rosemary Essential Oil and Quercetin
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Hot-Pressed Silica Matrix Composites
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Use of Chitosan and Starch-Based Flocculants for Filter Backwash Water Treatment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 10
10.3390/ma15103667
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermal Stability of Fluorescent Chitosan Modified with Heterocyclic Aromatic Dyes

by
Dagmara Bajer
* and
Halina Kaczmarek
*
Faculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Gagarina 7, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(10), 3667; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103667
Submission received: 12 April 2022 / Revised: 17 May 2022 / Accepted: 18 May 2022 / Published: 20 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Paper in Section Materials Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Fluorescent biopolymer derivatives are increasingly used in biology and medicine, but their resistance to heat and UV radiation, which are sterilizing agents, is relatively unknown. In this work, chitosan (CS) modified by three different heterocyclic aromatic dyes based on benzimidazole, benzothiazole, and benzoxazole (assigned as IBm, BTh, and BOx) has been studied. The thermal properties of these CS derivatives have been determined using the Thermogravimetric Analysis coupled with the Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy of volatile degradation products. The influence of UV radiation on the thermal resistance of modified, fluorescent chitosan samples was also investigated. Based on the temperature onset as well as the decomposition temperatures at a maximal rate, IBm was found to be more thermally stable than BOx and BTh. However, this dye gave off the most volatile products (mainly water, ammonia, carbon oxides, and carbonyl/ether compounds). The substitution of dyes for chitosan changes its thermal stability slightly. Characteristic decomposition temperatures in modified CS vary by a few degrees (<10 °C) from the virgin sample. Considering the temperatures of the main decomposition stage, CS-BOx turned out to be the most stable. The UV irradiation of chitosan derivatives leads to minor changes in the thermal parameters and a decrease in the number of volatile degradation products. It was concluded that the obtained CS derivatives are characterized by good resistance to heat and UV irradiation, which extends the possibilities of using these innovative materials.

1. Introduction

Fluorescent compounds are now widely used in various industrial branches and fields of modern medicine, such as imaging materials, photosensitizers, light-emitting diodes, and biological markers, allowing for the detection of protein, nucleic acids, living cells, or damaged tissues [1,2,3,4,5]. Particularly noteworthy is the use of fluorescent dyes in medical diagnostics, e.g., the early detection of cancer (e.g., neurologic tumors, spinal glioma, thyroid, and parathyroid tumors; breast, colon, and skin cancers) or HIV [6,7,8]. Among those compounds are methylene blue, fluorescein, and indocyanine green. Another group of fluorescent moieties used in anticancer Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) is BODIPY—dyes based on boron difluoride and dipyrromethene groups with various substituents.
As reported by the latest works, fluorescence labeling can also be successfully applied in biological studies and in the detection of the COVID-19 coronavirus [9,10]. Such wide applications are the reason for the intensive research on fluorescent compounds in recent years, contributing to significant progress in modern technologies utilizing light emission phenomena. For practical applications, the specific properties of such compounds are required, namely, a high absorption coefficient, a high fluorescence quantum yield, sensitivity, stability, and a resistance to chemical and environmental factors (including atmospheric oxygen, solar radiation, temperature, and humidity, as well as pollution in the form of exhaust fumes and industrial dust) [1,11].
Biological activity (e.g., antimicrobial, antiviral, or anti-inflammatory properties) and enhanced thermal resistance are required in some cases. Moreover, water solubility, a rare feature in organic compounds, is also substantial for biomedical applications [1,12,13].
The desired properties of fluorescent substances can be obtained in the process of the modification of known organic dyes [14,15,16]. One way to modify low molecular weight organic dyes is through their chemical or physical binding with macromolecules. Recently, several articles on fluorescent polymers [17,18,19], including biopolymers [20,21], have been published, but there are still few studies on the behavior of these innovative materials at elevated temperatures [20,22].
A thermogravimetric analysis of chitin and chitosan grafted by 3-hexylthiophene (3HT) and fluorene (F) was presented in a work by Hai, T.A.P. [20]. It turned out that both functionalized polysaccharides were fluorescent, but their thermal stability decreased compared to the neat biopolymers. However, a physical mixture of chitin or chitosan with conjugated polymers based on 3HT or F exhibited improved thermal resistance. Pan, X. [22], who synthesized novel fluorescent carbazolyl-pyridinyl alternating copolymers, found their thermal stability with an onset of degradation at 370–400 °C and high glass transition (Tg = 120–150 °C). These two examples show that it is difficult to predict the heat resistance of polymers modified to achieve emission properties. Therefore, the lack of thermal characteristics of fluorescent polymers, relevant from the point of view of practical applications, is an information gap.
It should be pointed out that the Thermal Analysis (TA) of polymeric materials provides information not only about their heat resistance and uses in various conditions but also about their chemical structure, phase transformations (melting point, glass transition), polymorphic forms, relaxation processes, composition and purity of compounds, constituent compatibility, degradation products, and kinetics. It is also a valuable tool for the quick identification of adsorbed volatile substances, e.g., moisture content (also the determination of crystallization water), residual solvents, unreacted monomers, and modifiers [23,24,25]. TA, which can be conducted in various atmospheres (oxidizing or inert), covers a whole range of techniques, ranging from classical Thermogravimetry (TG) or Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) to more complex techniques, e.g., TG-DTG (Derivative Thermogravimetry), TG-DTA (Differential Thermal Analysis), Thermomechanical Analysis (TMA), and Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) [26,27].
Moreover, thermogravimetry can be coupled with instruments, allowing for the monitoring of the evolved gas, such as MS (Mass Spectrometry), FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy), or GC-MS (Gas Chromatography-MS). The use of online combined (called also hyphenated) techniques, which exploit the advantages of the individual components, provides quick and complementary results about the material under study [23]. These methods allow you to record simultaneously, among other things, weight loss, energetic effects (Exo and Endo), heat capacity, the characteristic temperatures (i.e., the onset or the maximum rate) of physical processes and chemical reactions, or the type of gaseous substances released as a function of temperature. These multi-parameter results are obtained during one measurement in the same conditions for a small sample (a few mg) [28].
Hyphenated thermal analysis techniques (double or even triple) are currently widely used to study the thermal processes in polymers [29] and polymeric nanocomposites [30,31] and, increasingly, for the study of waste pyrolysis [32] and microplastics polluting the environment [33,34].
Our last work described the photochemical properties of chitosan modified with heterocyclic aromatic dyes based on benzimidazole, benzoxazole, and benzothiazole [35]. It was found that even a small degree of the replacement of functional groups in chitosan with fluorophores (not exceeding 3%) contributes to the formation of intensive fluorescence when excited at a wavelength of 425 nm. Moreover, new fluorescent chitosan derivatives were tested for their photochemical stability and biological properties. The effect of the high-energy UV-C radiation with a wavelength of 254 nm was studied for both solid samples and solutions using FTIR and UV-Vis spectroscopy. It has been proven that photochemical reactions (mainly photobleaching) occur with greater efficiency in solutions than in the thin solid films of modified chitosan [35]. The use of chitosan as a matrix for fluorescent compounds has many advantages, the most important of which is the biodegradability of the system and an increase in the photochemical stability of the substituted dyes. Furthermore, these modified chitosan specimens are characterized by biocompatibility, biological inertness, and biocidal properties.
The main goal of this work was to present the results of the thermogravimetric analysis coupled with the FTIR analysis of evolved gas for three fluorescent chitosan (CS) derivatives containing substituted trans-2-[2-(4-formylphenyl)ethenyl]benzimi-dazole, BIm, p-[trans-2-(benzoxazol-2-yl)ethenyl]benzaldehyde, BOx, and p-[trans-2-(benzthiazol-2-yl)ethenyl]benzaldehyde, BTh. The thermal stability of the dyes (BIm, Box, BTh) used to modify chitosan was also investigated. TA-FTIR was applied to illustrate the chemical changes in the structure of the modified fluorescent chitosan under the influence of UV irradiation.
This work is a continuation of the characterization of the same N-substituted chitosan derivatives presented in the previous work [35]. Information about the thermal properties of these new polysaccharide materials is essential from a practical point of view—it allows us to estimate the possibility of their use at elevated temperatures. At the same time, TGA tests enable the detection of structural changes in the case of the prior exposure of samples to UV radiation, often used as a sterilizing agent.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Chitosan (CS), a copolymer of β-(1→4)-linked D-glucosamine with N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, and substrates for the synthesis of the dyes (2-methylbenzimidazole, 2-methylbenzoxazole, 2-methylbenzothiazole, and terephthalaldehyde) have been purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MI, USA). Other reagents and solvents (acetic anhydride, acetic acid, acetone, and methanol) were supplied by Avantor™ Performance Materials, Gliwice, Poland. The average molecular weight and deacetylation degree of the initial chitosan were 50,000 g/mol and 87%, respectively. The synthesis of the dyes (BIm, BOx, BTh) was performed according to the procedure described in work [36]. These compounds were substituted into the biopolymer chains using the reaction of the aldehyde groups of the dyes with the amino groups in CS. The chemical structures and abbreviations of the studied compounds are shown in Figure 1.
The modified chitosans contained a relatively low amount of dye substituents, i.e., 2.9%, 2.7%, and 2.4% in CS-BIm, CS-BOx, and CS-BTh, respectively. The thin films (Figure S1) were made from the obtained chitosan derivatives by pouring dilute acetic acid solutions onto leveled 8 cm Petri dishes and evaporating the solvent at room temperature. A detailed description of this modification and the methodology of the sample preparation for testing were included in the earlier publication [35].
Half of the films of the chitosan derivatives were subjected to UV irradiation in room conditions for 8 h using a low-pressure mercury-vapor lamp TUV-30 W produced by Philips, Holland. The lamp emitted radiation with a wavelength of 254 nm, and the dose obtained by the samples was 28.8 J/cm2. Samples of the same thickness (approx. 10 μm) were selected for irradiation.

2.2. Thermal Analysis

The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of all samples (non-irradiated and UV-irradiated) was performed on the Jupiter STA 449 F5 thermoanalyzer by Netzsch coupled with the FT-IR Vertex 70V spectrometer by Bruker Optik in the following conditions: a nitrogen atmosphere, a temperature range of 20–600 °C, and a heating rate of 10°/min. The weight of the samples was 6–10 mg. The simultaneous measurement of TG, DTG, and DSC allowed for the determination of the following parameters: decomposition onset temperature (T0), temperature (Tmax) at the maximum process rate (Vmax), weight loss (∆m) for individual stages, and heat effects (ΔH) accompanying the decomposition. The mixture of volatile products, released at temperatures ranging from room temperature to 600 °C, was analyzed based on the infrared spectra recorded in the range of 400–4000 cm−1. The evolved gases were transported to the gas cell (with ZnSe spectrophotometric windows) in an FTIR spectrophotometer. The connections between the thermoanalyzer and spectrophotometer were heated to 200 °C to prevent condensation. The carrier gas shows no infrared absorption.

3. Results and Discussion

The thermogravimetric analysis of specially synthesized heterocyclic compounds and chitosan modified with those dyes, as well as the influence of UV radiation on the thermal stability of the samples, were tested under dynamic conditions. The investigations included the in situ detection of gaseous products released during heating (using FTIR spectroscopy). Combining these two techniques allows for an understanding of the thermal decomposition mechanism of new fluorescent chitosan derivatives, which have not been the subject of research so far.

3.1. Thermal Stability of Chitosan Modifiers: Low-Molecular-Weight Heterocyclic Compounds—BIm, Box, and BTh

The TGA shows that the course of the thermal decomposition of the three tested heterocyclic aromatic dyes differs significantly, which of course results from the difference in the chemical structure of these compounds (Figure 2a–c). In any case, no evaporation of moisture is observed (no weight loss around 100 °C). Two of these compounds (BIm and BTh) are destroyed in one step. Only BOx shows two visible on the DTG curve stages: the main with a maximum at 279 °C (with dominant mass loss) and the overlapping minor step at about 300 °C (Figure 2b).
Taking into account the temperatures characterizing the decay onset, the BOx sample has the lowest thermal resistance (To is 244 °C). In contrast, the most durable is BIm, which begins to decompose only around 320 °C (Table 1). Additionally, the maximum rate of the BOx decomposition is the lowest compared to the other two.
The weight loss of BIm at 600 °C is approx. 64%, while BOx and BTh decompose almost completely (∆m > 96%). These variations can be explained by the different stabilities of the heterocyclic ring, in which the weakest point is a single C-heteroatom linkage. It should be emphasized that the studied molecules are stabilized by resonance due to the presence of π electrons from aromatic rings, central vinyl bonds, as well as non-bonding electrons at the O, N, and S atoms. The most significant thermal stability in the case of BIm can be explained by the presence of hydrogens at the N atoms in the rings, which can form hydrogen bonds with the N or O atoms from neighboring molecules. Therefore, it can be assumed that these hydrogen bonds between the heterocyclic rings contribute to the increased thermal resistance of BIm. There is no such possibility in BOx and BTh, although, of course, in all of the studied heterocycles, there are aldehyde groups that participate in the formation of hydrogen bonds between the end groups.
The relatively high residue of the BIm sample at 600 °C, compared to the other two, indicates the formation of stable carbonaceous cross-linked structures containing aromatic rings. In the least stable sample BOx, due to the presence of an oxygen heteroatom, primary degradation products with oxidizing properties can be formed, which contributes to the greater degradation of the residue. As can be seen from the results, sulfur has a similar effect.
To establish an order of the stability of the tested compounds, the values of the onset of the decomposition temperature and the temperature at the maximum decomposition rate from TGA (Table 1) were used. It is as follows:
BIm > BTh > BOx
It can be concluded that the thermostability of these three heterocyclic compounds follows a similar trend as their photostability, tested in diluted solutions using an identical source of UV radiation [30].
The shape of the DSC curves also differs depending on the type of sample (Figure 2c). The studied heterocycles show endothermic peaks on the DSC corresponding to the melting point. Only BTh exhibited two separated melting temperatures (157 and 174 °C), indicating the coexistence of two different crystalline forms. The endotherms at higher temperatures correspond to the main decomposition of the samples.
The Gram–Schmidt (G–S) curve of BIm exhibits two extrema at 393 °C and 488 °C (very broad), pointing to the most intense release of volatile decomposition products in these temperatures (Figure 2c). Similarly, in the BOx sample, two main extrema appear at 342 and 549 °C. Only the BTh sample shows a continuous, almost monotonic increase in the G–S curve with temperature, without any peaks. It should be added that the extremum points at the G–S curves do not correspond exactly to the Tmax read from DTG. This is understandable because the samples do not just decompose into volatile products.
The accurate identification of gaseous products is difficult due to their variety and small quantities. The simultaneous FTIR analysis shows that the greatest number of volatile products was separated from the BIm sample. In addition to the moisture (3000–3600 cm−1), the other low intensive bands were observed at 1695, 1596, 1445, 1207, 1168, 966, 809, and 740 cm−1, which indicates the evolution of the fragmentation products containing carbonyl, ether, and vinyl groups (Figure 3a) [37]. Nitrogen-containing compounds cannot be excluded, because the absorption of amine/amide (1655 amide I, 1523 amide II, and 1580 N-H) overlaps with the carbonyl region. The weak band at 966 cm−1 can be assigned to ammonia.
In the remaining two compounds—BOx and BTh—the number of volatile products registered in infrared is negligible and on the noise limit (Figure 3b,c), suggesting that the released products condense.
It can therefore be concluded that the primary reactions of the thermal decomposition of BIm with the breaking of covalent bonds and the evolution of gaseous products lead to the formation of free radicals, which then recombine into more stable products (not decomposing even at 600 °C, where the carbon residue is above 35%).

3.2. Thermal Stability of Chitosan Derivatives—CS-BIm, CS-BOx, CS-BTh

The shape of the TG, DTG, and DSC curves of the samples heated at a constant rate of 10 °C/min to 600 °C changes slightly (Figure 4), indicating a minor influence of chitosan modification on the course of its thermal degradation.
Chitosan is a stable biopolymer up to about 250 °C. However, in the initial heating stage (in the range of 80–150 °C), a weight loss of approximately 8%, caused by the release of adsorbed water, is observed (Table 2). The similar thermal stability of chitosan has been reported in the literature [38,39]. The data indicate that the water is somewhat more strongly bound in the two N-substituted derivatives, CS-BIm and CS-BTh, than in the original chitosan.
The main decomposition of CS starts at 254 °C and proceeds at a maximum rate of 277 °C. It is accompanied by a weight loss of about 55%. Thermal decomposition is an exothermic transformation, as shown by the DSC curves. This exothermic effect can be connected with the simultaneous crosslinking of chitosan, as evidenced by a large residual mass not decomposed at 600 °C. As was reported before by Moussou et al., the apparent activation energy of CS thermal decomposition, determined by the Ozawa–Flynn–Wall method, is about 146 kJ/mol [40].
The shape of the TG, DTG, and DSC curves of CS-BIm, CS-BOx, and CS-BTh is similar to the unmodified chitosan curves, but shifts in the main determined thermal parameters are observed. An increase in To, Tmax, and Texo at the DSC curve in the main decomposition stage (step II) indicates an improvement in the thermal resistance of CS-BOx and CS-BTh compared to CS. In the light of these data, CS-BIm appears to be the least thermally resistant material, although the differences in the determined parameters are low. This can be explained by the lower thermal crosslinking degree, which the smallest amount of carbonaceous residue (55.6%) indicates. This sample exhibits the highest value of decomposition heat (172 J/g).
Considering the total weight loss in the modified chitosan samples, several percent lower than in the pristine CS, it can be concluded that the aromatic heterocyclic substituents slightly hamper the formation of thermally stable carbonaceous residue. Since, in the initial stages of the thermal destruction of polysaccharides, the side substituents are detached from the macrochains with the simultaneous release of gaseous products [41,42], CS loses its functional properties. Obviously, in the case of N-substituted chitosan derivatives, the abstraction or destruction of fluorophores (dye substituents) leads to a loss in emission properties. It can be assumed that the carbon residue consists mainly of crosslinked and condensed aromatic structures resulting from formed covalent bonds between the macrochains and the graphitization process, similarly as in unmodified CS [41,42]. This was confirmed by spectroscopic studies carried out systematically while heating the samples. The FTIR spectra showed the disappearance of functional groups (OH, NH) and a decrease in the degree of deacetylation, followed by chain breakage and the opening of glucoside rings. Finally, only the bands characteristic of C-H bonds in the aliphatic and aromatic compounds (corresponding to both stretching and deformation vibrations) were detected in the spectra of thermally degraded CS.
The slight variations in the determined thermal parameters of dye-modified chitosans are due to the low degree of N-substitution by heterocycles: 2.4–2.9% [35]. The lack of endothermic melting peaks of BIm, BOx, and BTh on the DSC curves of CS-BIm, CS-BOx, and CS-BTh additionally confirms that these modifying dyes are covalently linked to CS.
Summarizing this part of the research, the following sequence of thermostability can be proposed for the unirradiated samples:
CS-BOx > CS-BTh > CS > CS-BIm
This order was established from the temperature values at a maximum rate (Tmax) for the main (II) decomposition stage, listed in Table 2.
The explanation of the observed effects is not trivial. The reverse trend can be seen: the least stable dye (BOx), when chemically incorporated into CS macromolecules, improves its stability (CS-BOx). Considering the free radical mechanism of thermal decomposition, it can be assumed that benzoxazole radicals generated from the least stable substituent (BOx) quickly recombine with CS macroradicals (thus, finishing the degradation chain reaction), delaying the overall decomposition process.
On the contrary, BIm has the opposite effect, i.e., being the most thermostable dye itself, it generates radicals initiating chitosan degradation faster. Probably, the benzimidazole radicals are responsible for this effect due to the easier reaction with CS.

3.3. Effect of UV-Irradiation on the Thermal Stability of Chitosan Derivatives

The thermal analysis also allows for the observation of changes in the modified chitosan samples under UV radiation (Table 3, Figure 5). As can be seen from the presented data, the thermal stability of the modified chitosan previously exposed to UV changes slightly.
The water content in the CS-derivatives is lower by about 3% than in CS. To compare the thermal stability of the exposed CS-BIm, CS-BOx, and CS-BTh, we consider the main (II) stage of decomposition.
Among the UV-irradiated samples, the CS-BOx shows the most significant stability (as evidenced by the value of Tmax and Texo), which may indicate a particular share of oxygen-containing decomposition products in the creation of thermostable structures in this biopolymer (e.g., crosslinking). However, the maximum decomposition rate of this sample is the highest (Vmax = 8.2%/min). Similarly, the same sample not exposed to UV radiation was characterized by the highest decomposition rate (Table 2). It should be recalled that the starting BOx showed the lowest thermostability among the three tested heterocyclic compounds. This suggests that its degradation products may contribute to the thermal stabilization of CS. The abstraction of dye side groups during pyrolysis followed by their decay to free radicals may lead to subsequent recombination with the CS macroradicals formed in the earlier stages of thermal degradation.
The exposure to UV radiation only resulted in a 2–6.5 °C increase in Tmax in the CS alone, CS-BIm, and CS-Box samples, while in the CS-BTh sample, the Tmax decreases by two degrees.
Additionally, the loss of mass during the thermal decomposition of the irradiated samples differs slightly from that in the non-irradiated samples. It can therefore be concluded that the samples of modified CS are resistant to heat and, like chitosan itself, decompose only above 250 °C.
However, some differences are observed in the composition of volatile products released from the irradiated samples (Figure 6). Generally speaking, the most significant number of volatile products at temperatures above 250 °C was released from the starting (unexposed) chitosan (Figure 6a). The main bands are observed for unirradiated CS alone at the values (in cm−1) of 3520–3630 (OH), 2260–2400 (CO2), 1680–1840 (C=O, amide), 1390, 1280, 1174 (C-O), and 972 (N-H). Thus, the products are a mixture of water, carbon dioxide, ammonia, acetamide, and low-molecular carbonyl (ester)/ether derivatives.
This is in line with the results published by Corazzari et al. [43], who confirmed the release of H2O, CO, CO2, NH3, and CH3COOH during the pyrolysis of chitosan using the TGA-FTIR and GC-MS methods. Only carbon monoxide and acetic acid were not detected in our experiment. In another study, apart from the above-mentioned compounds, acetamide was found, the amount of which depends on the degree of CS deacetylation [44]. In an earlier work by Zeng et al., heterocyclic aromatic compounds with nitrogen, mainly pyrazines, were also detected during an isothermal test at 553 K [45]. Such products were not found in this work.
In UV-irradiated CS, similar bands were observed, but they were much less intensive (Figure 6b). This allows us to conclude that the identified products partially evolved during the photolysis preceding the thermal decomposition.
The FTIR of the gaseous excretions from CS-BIm (Figure 6c), besides the substances typical for CS, also contain a significant number of unsaturated compounds (absorbing at 953 cm−1), but in this irradiated sample, their release is minimized (Figure 6d).
The exposure to UV radiation only resulted in a 2–6.5 °C increase in Tmax in the CS alone, CS-BIm, and CS-Box samples, while in the CS-BTh sample, the Tmax decreases by two degrees.
Further, the loss of mass during the thermal decomposition of the irradiated samples differs slightly from that in the non-irradiated ones. It can therefore be concluded that the samples of modified CS are resistant to heat and, like chitosan itself, decompose only above 250 °C.
The unexposed CS-BOx and CS-BTh samples (Figure 6e,g) show less CO2, but the detached carbonyl product is dominant. Only in CS-BOx is a more volatile product after the exposure to UV observed (Figure 6f), which may indicate the catalytic effect of the photodegradation products trapped in the polymer matrix on the thermal destruction of this specimen. According to Bussiere’s reports [46,47], the released volatile products can accumulate on the surface of the samples and contribute to an increase in roughness and adhesion work. The authors emphasize that the observed changes are the effect of the surface crosslinking.
The order of the thermal stability of the irradiated chitosan derivatives (estimated from the temperatures at a maximum decomposition rate of IInd step—Tmax, Table 3) is:
CS-BOx > CS-BTh ≅ CS > CS-BIm
It practically does not differ from that for the non-irradiated samples.

4. Conclusions

Thermogravimetry coupled with an FTIR analysis of volatile decomposition products indicated that BIm is the most thermally stable sample, and BOx is the least thermally resistant sample among the three tested dyes used for CS modification. At the same time, the BIm sample released the most volatile products, containing heteroatoms (mainly oxygen and nitrogen) and unsaturated bonds.
Heterocyclic aromatic substituents only negligibly contribute to the heat resistance of the CS. The TGA analysis showed the resistance of chitosan derivatives up to ca. 250 °C. Based on the temperatures at the beginning and the maximum decomposition rate, it can be stated that the lowest thermal stability is exhibited by CS-BIm, which is related to its lower susceptibility to thermal crosslinking. The other two derivatives (CS-BOx and CS-BTh) also showed a lower mass at 600 °C (compared to CS alone), which is a carbonized crosslinked biopolymer residue.
The effect of UV exposure on thermal stability was also studied. CS-BOx shows the best resistance among all UV-exposed and unexposed CS derivatives.
The main volatile products of the thermal decomposition of modified CS are water, carbon dioxide, ammonia, and carbonyl/ether compounds. The number of these evaporated products decreases in the UV-irradiated samples.
The good thermal and photochemical stability of the dye-substituted chitosan is crucial from a practical point of view. Thanks to this, such materials intended, for example, for biomedical applications, can be sterilized with heat or UV radiation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma15103667/s1, Figure S1: Photos of thin films of studied samples: chitosan (a), CS-BIm (b), CS-BOx (c), CS-BTH (d).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.K.; investigation, D.B.; writing—original draft preparation, D.B.; writing—review and editing, H.K.; visualization, D.B.; supervision, H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Katarzyna Zblewska, for the technical support in the preparation of the samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fei, X.; Gu, Y. Progress in modifications and applications of fluorescent dye probe. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2009, 19, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Taraska, J.W.; Zagotta, W.N. Fluorescence applications in molecular neurobiology. Neuron 2010, 66, 170–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hou, R.; Zhao, B.; Xia, Y.; Li, D. Organic Fluorescent Compounds that Display Efficient Aggregation-Induced Emission Enhancement and Intramolecular Charge Transfer. Molecules 2018, 23, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gonçalves, M.S.T. Fluorescent Labeling of Biomolecules with Organic Probes. Chem. Rev. 2008, 109, 190–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hu, Z.Q.; Li, M.; Liu, M.D.; Zhuang, W.M.; Li, G.K. A highly sensitive fluorescent acidic pH probe based on rhodamine B diethyl-2-aminobutenedioate conjugate and its application in living cells. Dyes Pigm. 2013, 96, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhu, S.L.; Zhang, J.T.; Janjanam, J.; Bi, J.H.; Vegesna, G.; Tiwari, A.; Luo, F.T.; Wei, J.J.; Liu, H.Y. Highly water-soluble, near-infrared emissive BODIPY polymeric dye bearing RGD peptide residues for cancer imaging. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 758, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Woo, Y.; Chaurasiya, S.; O’Leary, M.; Han, E.; Fong, Y. Fluorescent imaging for cancer therapy and cancer gene therapy. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 2021, 23, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lifson, M.A.; Ozen, M.O.; Inci, F.; Wang, S.Q.; Inan, H.; Baday, M.; Henrich, T.J.; Demirci, U. Advances in biosensing strategies for HIV detection, diagnosis, and therapeutic monitoring. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 103, 90–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Putlyaeva, L.V.; Lukyanov, K.A. Studying SARS-CoV-2 with Fluorescence Microscopy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Samacoits, A.; Nimsamer, P.; Mayuramart, O.; Chantaravisoot, N.; Sitthi-amorn, P.; Nakhakes, C.; Luangkamchorn, L.; Tongcham, P.; Zahm, U.; Suphanpayak, S.; et al. Machine Learning-Driven and Smartphone-Based Fluorescence Detection for CRISPR Diagnostic of SARS-CoV-2. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 2727–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, Y.; Gao, Y.; He, Y.; Zhang, G.; Wen, H.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Q.-P.; Cui, H. Determining Essential Requirements for Fluorophore Selection in Various Fluorescence Applications Taking Advantage of Diverse Structure–Fluorescence Information of Chromone Derivatives. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 1001–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lu, L.; Rininsland, F.H.; Wittenburg, S.K.; Achyuthan, K.E.; Duncan, W.; McBranch, D.W.; Whitten, D.G. Biocidal Activity of a Light-Absorbing Fluorescent Conjugated Polyelectrolyte. Langmuir 2005, 21, 10154–10159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhu, C.; Liu, L.; Yang, Q.; Fengting Lv, F.; Wang, S. Water-Soluble Conjugated Polymers for Imaging, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 4687–4735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Choi, C.-S. Fluorescent Compounds Having the Spaced and Integrated Type Receptors. Korean Soc. Photoscience 2016, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  15. Zheng, H.; Zhan, X.-Q.; Bian, Q.-N.; Zhang, X.-J. Advances in modifying fluorescein and rhodamine fluorophores as fluorescent chemosensors. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 429–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wagh, S.B.; Maslivetc, V.A.; La Clair, J.J.; Kornienko, A. Lessons in Organic Fluorescent Probe Discovery. ChemBioChem 2021, 22, 3109–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chatterjee, D.P.; Pakhira, M.; Nandi, A.K. Fluorescence in “Nonfluorescent” Polymers. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 30747–30766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, T.; Zhang, N.; Baic, W.; Bao, Y. Fluorescent chemosensors based on conjugated polymers with N-heterocyclic moieties: Two decades of progress. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11, 3095–3114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ahumada, G.; Borkowska, M. Fluorescent Polymers Conspectus. Polymers 2022, 14, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hai, T.A.P.; Sugimoto, R. Fluorescence control of chitin and chitosan fabricated via surface functionalization using direct oxidative polymerization. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 7005–7013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Marpu, S.B.; Benton, E.N. Shining Light on Chitosan: A Review on the Usage of Chitosan for Photonics and Nanomaterials Research. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pan, X.; Liu, S.; Chan, H.S.O.; Ng, S.-C. Novel Fluorescent Carbazolyl−Pyridinyl Alternating Copoloymers: Synthesis, Characterization, and Properties. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 7629–7635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Seifi, H.; Gholami, T.; Seifi, S.; Ghoreishi, S.M.; Salavati-Niasari, M. A review on current trends in thermal analysis and hyphenated techniques in the investigation of physical, mechanical and chemical properties of nanomaterials. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2020, 149, 104840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saikia, P. Chapter 5-Physical and thermal analysis of polymer. In Polymer Science and Innovative Applications. Materials, Techniques, and Future Developments, 1st ed.; AlMaadeed, M.A.A., Ponnamma, D., Carignano, M.A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Oxford, UK; Cambridge, UK, 2020; pp. 153–205. [Google Scholar]
  25. Pielichowski, K.; Pielichowska, K. Thermal Analysis of Polymeric Materials-Methods and Developments; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH: Weinheim, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, Z. Review and prospect of thermal analysis technology applied to study thermal properties of energetic materials. FirePhysChem 2021, 1, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ozawa, T. Thermal analysis-Review and prospect. Thermochim. Acta 2000, 355, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gabbott, P. Principles and Applications of Thermal Analysis; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Singapore, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gianotti, V.; Antonioli, D.; Sparnacci, K.; Laus, M.; Cassino, C.; Marsano, F.; Seguini, G.; Perego, M. TGA-GC–MS quantitative analysis of phosphorus-end capped functional polymers in bulk and ultrathin films. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2017, 128, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cervantes-Uc, J.M.; Moo Espinosa, J.I.; Cauich-Rodríguez, J.V.; Ávila-Ortega, A.; Vázquez-Torres, H.; Marcos-Fernández, A.; San Román, J. TGA/FTIR studies of segmented aliphatic polyurethanes and their nanocomposites prepared with commercial montmorillonites. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2009, 94, 1666–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Feng, J.; Hao, J.; Du, J.; Yang, R. Using TGA/FTIR TGA/MS and cone calorimetry to understand thermal degradation and flame retardancy mechanism of polycarbonate filled with solid bisphenol A bis(diphenyl phosphate) and montmorillonite. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2012, 97, 605–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Singh, S.; Wu, C.; Williams, P.T. Pyrolysis of waste materials using TGA-MS and TGA-FTIR as complementary characterisation techniques. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2012, 94, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mansa, R.; Zou, S. Thermogravimetric analysis of microplastics: A mini review. Environ. Adv. 2021, 5, 100117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, Y.; Li, R.; Yu, J.; Ni, F.; Sheng, Y.; Scircle, A.; Cizdziel, J.V.; Zhou, Y. Separation and identification of microplastics in marine organisms by TGA-FTIR-GC/MS: A case study of mussels from coastal China. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 272, 115946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kaczmarek, H.; Tafelska-Kaczmarek, A.; Roszek, K.; Czarnecka, J.; Jędrzejewska, B.; Zblewska, K. Fluorescent Chitosan Modified with Heterocyclic Aromatic Dyes. Materials 2021, 14, 6429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Huang, Z.; Lei, H.; Li, N.; Qiu, Z.; Wang, H.; Guo, J.; Luo, Y.; Zhong, Z.; Liuc, X.; Zhi-Hong, Z. Novel heterocycle-based organic molecules with two-photon induced blue fluorescent emission. J. Mater. Chem. 2003, 13, 708–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, W.; Xiao, L.; Qin, C. The Characterization and Thermal Investigation of Chitosan-Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Synthesized Via A Novel One-step Modifying Process. J. Macromol. Sci. A 2010, 48, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Neto, C.G.T.; Giacometti, J.A.; Job, A.E.; Ferreira, F.C.; Fonseca, J.L.C.; Pereira, M.R. Thermal Analysis of Chitosan Based Networks. Carbohydr. Polym. 2005, 62, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ziegler-Borowska, M.; Chełminiak, D.; Kaczmarek, H.; Kaczmarek-Kędziera, A. Effect of side substituents on thermal stability of the modified chitosan and its nanocomposite with magnetite. J. Therm. Anal. Calor. 2016, 124, 1267–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Moussout, H.; Ahlafi, H.; Aazza, M.; Bourakhouadar, M. Kinetics and mechanism of the thermal degradation of biopolymers chitin and chitosan using thermogravimetric analysis. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016, 130, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kaczmarek, H.; Zawadzki, J. Chitosan pyrolysis and adsorption properties of chitosan and its carbonizate. Carbohydr. Res. 2010, 345, 941–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zawadzki, J.; Kaczmarek, H. Thermal treatment of chitosan in various conditions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 80, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Corazzari, I.; Nisticò, R.; Turci, F.; Faga, M.G.; Franzoso, F.; Tabasso, S.; Magnacca, G. Advanced physico-chemical characterization of chitosan by means of TGA coupled on-line with FTIR and GCMS: Thermal degradation and water adsorption capacity. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2015, 112, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Barbosa, H.F.G.; Francisco, D.S.; Ferreira, A.P.G.; Cavalheiro, É.T.G. A new look towards the thermal decomposition of chitins and chitosans with different degrees of deacetylation by coupled TG-FTIR. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 225, 115232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zeng, L.; Qin, C.; Wang, L.; Li, W. Volatile compounds formed from the pyrolysis of chitosan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 83, 1553–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bussiere, P.-O.; Gardette, J.-L.; Rapp, G.; Masson, C.; Therias, S. New insights into the mechanism of photodegradation of chitosan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 259, 117715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bussière, P.O.; Rivaton, A.; Sandrine Thérias, S.; Gardette, J.-L. Multiscale Investigation of the Poly(N-vinylcarbazole) Photoageing Mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 802–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 15 03667 g001
Figure 1. Structure of studied compounds—dye: BIm (a), BOx (b), and BTh (c); initial chitosan as a reference (d) and fluorescent chitosan CS-BIm, CS-BOx, and CS-BTh (e).
Figure 1. Structure of studied compounds—dye: BIm (a), BOx (b), and BTh (c); initial chitosan as a reference (d) and fluorescent chitosan CS-BIm, CS-BOx, and CS-BTh (e).
Materials 15 03667 g001
Materials 15 03667 g002aMaterials 15 03667 g002b
Figure 2. TG (a), DTG (b), DSC, and Gram–Schmidt graphs (c) of BIm, Box, and BTh compounds.
Figure 2. TG (a), DTG (b), DSC, and Gram–Schmidt graphs (c) of BIm, Box, and BTh compounds.
Materials 15 03667 g002aMaterials 15 03667 g002b
Materials 15 03667 g003
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of evolved gases from BIm (a), BOx (b), and BTh (c) at 500 °C. At the top, the main bands are assigned to the respective groups.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of evolved gases from BIm (a), BOx (b), and BTh (c) at 500 °C. At the top, the main bands are assigned to the respective groups.
Materials 15 03667 g003
Materials 15 03667 g004
Figure 4. TG/DTG (a) and DSC (b) curves of CS, CS-BIm, CS-BOx, and CS-BTh (unirradiated).
Figure 4. TG/DTG (a) and DSC (b) curves of CS, CS-BIm, CS-BOx, and CS-BTh (unirradiated).
Materials 15 03667 g004
Materials 15 03667 g005
Figure 5. Comparison of TG, DTG, and DSC curves for unirradiated (solid lines) and 8 h UV-irradiated (dashed lines) samples: CS (a) CS-BIm (b), CS-BOx (c), and CS-BTh (d).
Figure 5. Comparison of TG, DTG, and DSC curves for unirradiated (solid lines) and 8 h UV-irradiated (dashed lines) samples: CS (a) CS-BIm (b), CS-BOx (c), and CS-BTh (d).
Materials 15 03667 g005
Materials 15 03667 g006aMaterials 15 03667 g006b
Figure 6. TGA-FTIR plots of CS, CS-BIm, CS-BOx, and CS-BTh samples: left panel—unirradiated samples (a,c,e,g); right panel—8 h UV irradiated samples (b,d,f,h). Axis description: X—temperature (°C), Y—wavenumber (cm−1), and Z—absorbance.
Figure 6. TGA-FTIR plots of CS, CS-BIm, CS-BOx, and CS-BTh samples: left panel—unirradiated samples (a,c,e,g); right panel—8 h UV irradiated samples (b,d,f,h). Axis description: X—temperature (°C), Y—wavenumber (cm−1), and Z—absorbance.
Materials 15 03667 g006aMaterials 15 03667 g006b
Table 1. Parameters of heterocyclic compounds (BIm, BOx, and BTh) determined from TG, DTG, DSC, and Gram–Schmidt curves.
Table 1. Parameters of heterocyclic compounds (BIm, BOx, and BTh) determined from TG, DTG, DSC, and Gram–Schmidt curves.
SampleTo, °CTmax, °C∆m, %Vmax,
%/min		Melting Point, °CGram–Schmidt Curve
BIm32036264.28.0196two peaks of similar intensity at 393 and 488 °C;
BOx244279, 30098.919.3187two peaks at 342 °C (main) and 549 °C (weak);
BTh26531096.717.5156, 174lack of peaks, monotonic growth without extremum
Table 2. Thermal parameters of unirradiated (0 h) chitosan and modified chitosan samples determined from TGA/DSC analysis.
Table 2. Thermal parameters of unirradiated (0 h) chitosan and modified chitosan samples determined from TGA/DSC analysis.
Sample
0 h		I StepII StepTotal
∆m, %
To, °CTmax, °C∆m, %To, °CTmax, °C∆m, %Texo, °C;
ΔH, J/g		Vmax,
%/min
CS801217.725427754.8276; 1537.562.4
CS-BIm75945.325427351.7280; 1727.355.6
CS-BOx731037.926528853.0291; 1408.760.5
CS-BTh751105.725928452.6288; 1327.458.3
Table 3. Thermal parameters of 8 h UV irradiated chitosan and modified chitosan samples determined from TGA analysis.
Table 3. Thermal parameters of 8 h UV irradiated chitosan and modified chitosan samples determined from TGA analysis.
Sample
8 h UV		I StepII StepTotal
∆m, %
To, °CTmax, °C∆m, %To, °CTmax, °C∆m, %Texo,°C;
ΔH, J/g		Vmax,
%/min
CS83928.125428352.9283; 1406.560.7
CS-BIm73945.325427651.7286; 2857.557.1
CS-BOx731015.626629053.5296; 4028.259.2
CS-BTh711035.625528052.2287; 2907.158.0
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bajer, D.; Kaczmarek, H. Thermal Stability of Fluorescent Chitosan Modified with Heterocyclic Aromatic Dyes. Materials 2022, 15, 3667. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103667

AMA Style

Bajer D, Kaczmarek H. Thermal Stability of Fluorescent Chitosan Modified with Heterocyclic Aromatic Dyes. Materials. 2022; 15(10):3667. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103667

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bajer, Dagmara, and Halina Kaczmarek. 2022. "Thermal Stability of Fluorescent Chitosan Modified with Heterocyclic Aromatic Dyes" Materials 15, no. 10: 3667. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103667

APA Style

Bajer, D., & Kaczmarek, H. (2022). Thermal Stability of Fluorescent Chitosan Modified with Heterocyclic Aromatic Dyes. Materials, 15(10), 3667. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103667

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop