Next Article in Journal
Formation, Structure and Magnetic Properties of MFe2O4@SiO2 (M = Co, Mn, Zn, Ni, Cu) Nanocomposites
Previous Article in Journal
Study of Radiation Characteristics of Intrinsic Josephson Junction Terahertz Emitters with Different Thickness of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Crystals
Previous Article in Special Issue
Damage Analysis of Composite CFRP Tubes Using Acoustic Emission Monitoring and Pattern Recognition Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue: Selected Papers from Experimental Stress Analysis 2020

1
Institute of Physics of Materials, Czech Academy of Sciences, 61662 Brno, Czech Republic
2
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, 70800 Ostrava, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(5), 1136; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14051136
Submission received: 23 February 2021 / Accepted: 24 February 2021 / Published: 28 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from Experimental Stress Analysis 2020)
The contemporary way of living brings about increasing demands on materials used in our everyday lives. Challenging requirements are put on the performance of modern metallic, as well as non-metallic, materials throughout commerce and industry. These requirements are not only from the viewpoint of their lifetime and durability, but also in the context of their user friendliness and safety. A great example of the importance of human safety in everyday life is presented by the published paper studying the effects of a collision involving a pedestrian with a tramway vehicle [1].
A great method that is of help during the research and development of innovative materials and components is the finite element method (FEM). Based on numerical computations performed with reliable models of real assemblies with optimized boundary conditions [2], FEM is not only useful for the thorough testing of high-level properties of durable metallic materials and components [3,4], but is also helpful in numerous other applications. Such applications include the abovementioned investigation of the impacts of a pedestrian/tram collision [1], simulations of the performance of bio-applicable components and materials [5,6,7], and in solving challenging industrial tasks [8,9].
However, the greatest impact on the successful and satisfactory performance of innovative components has been on the type of the material used, and the applied production and processing technologies. In addition to conventional alloys [10] and commercially pure elements [11], modern materials also include light and durable metallic composites [12], carbon tube reinforced polymers (CTRP) [13], and thermoplastic composites [14]. Additive manufacturing (or 3D printing) of powders, including methods such as selective laser melting (SLM) [3], has recently gained a great deal of attention. However, conventional production technologies, such as casting and welding [10,15], are still popular, especially for specific applications (large components or semi-products). Nevertheless, conventional (rolling, forging, etc. [16]), as well as unconventional (severe plastic deformation (SPD) methods, rotary swaging, etc. [17,18]) processing methods are applicable for both types of semi-products, i.e., conventionally produced and 3D printed. Optimized selection of the methods and conditions of processing can greatly enhance the performance and properties of virtually any semi-product.
Last but not least, research of innovative materials and components goes hand in hand with the development of modern testing methods, advantageously non-destructive ones, some of which are also of interest to the presented Special Issue. Popular methods are those based on optical systems, such as the PhotoStress and digital image correlation (DIC) methods [19], or the acoustic emission method based on transferring acoustic signals through the tested material [20]. Neutron diffraction is also among the top-level non-destructive testing methods [21,22].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Špirk, S.; Špička, J.; Vychytil, J.; Křížek, M.; Stehlík, A. Utilization of the Validated Windshield Material Model in Simulation of Tram to Pedestrian Collision. Materials 2021, 14, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kocich, R.; Greger, M.; Macháčková, A. Finite element investigation of influence of selected factors on ECAP process. In Proceedings of the Metal 2010, Rožnov pod Radhoštěm, Czech Republic, 18–20 May 2010; pp. 166–171. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kořínek, M.; Halama, R.; Fojtík, F.; Pagáč, M.; Krček, J.; Krzikalla, D.; Kocich, R.; Kunčická, L. Monotonic Tension-Torsion Experiments and FE Modeling on Notched Specimens Produced by SLM Technology from SS316L. Materials 2021, 14, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kocich, R.; Kunčická, L.; Davis, C.F.; Lowe, T.C.; Szurman, I.; Macháčková, A. Deformation behavior of multilayered Al-Cu clad composite during cold-swaging. Mater. Des. 2016, 90, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kunčická, L.; Kocich, R.; Drápala, J.; Andreyachshenko, V. FEM simulations and comparison of the ecap and ECAP-PBP influence on Ti6Al4V alloy’s deformation behaviour. In Proceedings of the Metal 2013, Brno, Czech Republic, 15–17 May 2013; pp. 391–396. [Google Scholar]
  6. Marsalek, P.; Sotola, M.; Rybansky, D.; Repa, V.; Halama, R.; Fusek, M.; Prokop, J. Modeling and Testing of Flexible Structures with Selected Planar Patterns Used in Biomedical Applications. Materials 2021, 14, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zach, L.; Kunčická, L.; Růžička, P.; Kocich, R. Design, analysis and verification of a knee joint oncological prosthesis finite element model. Comput. Biol. Med. 2014, 54, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kocich, R. Design and optimization of induction heating for tungsten heavy alloy prior to rotary swaging. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2020, 93, 105353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Macháčková, A.; Kocich, R.; Bojko, M.; Kunčická, L.; Polko, K. Numerical and experimental investigation of flue gases heat recovery via condensing heat exchanger. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2018, 124, 1321–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Čapek, J.; Trojan, K.; Kec, J.; Černý, I.; Ganev, N.; Němeček, S. On the Weldability of Thick P355NL1 Pressure Vessel Steel Plates Using Laser Welding. Materials 2021, 14, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kunčická, L.; Kocich, R.; Král, P.; Pohludka, M.; Marek, M. Effect of strain path on severely deformed aluminium. Mater. Lett. 2016, 180, 280–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kunčická, L.; Kocich, R.; Strunz, P.; Macháčková, A. Texture and residual stress within rotary swaged Cu/Al clad composites. Mater. Lett. 2018, 230, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kostroun, T.; Dvořák, M. Application of the Pulse Infrared Thermography Method for Nondestructive Evaluation of Composite Aircraft Adhesive Joints. Materials 2021, 14, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hron, R.; Kadlec, M.; Růžek, R. Effect of the Test Procedure and Thermoplastic Composite Resin Type on the Curved Beam Strength. Materials 2021, 14, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Thomasová, M.; Seiner, H.; Sedlák, P.; Frost, M.; Ševčík, M.; Szurman, I.; Kocich, R.; Drahokoupil, J.; Šittner, P.; Landa, M. Evolution of macroscopic elastic moduli of martensitic polycrystalline NiTi and NiTiCu shape memory alloys with pseudoplastic straining. Acta Mater. 2017, 123, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khalaj, O.; Jirková, H.; Burdová, K.; Stehlík, A.; Kučerová, L.; Vrtáček, J.; Svoboda, J. Hot Rolling vs. Forging: Newly Developed Fe-Al-O Based OPH Alloy. Metals 2021, 11, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kunčická, L.; Kocich, R. Deformation behaviour of Cu-Al clad composites produced by rotary swaging. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP publishing: Bristol, UK, 2018; Volume 369, p. 012029. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kocich, R.; Kunčická, L.; Král, P.; Macháčková, A. Sub-structure and mechanical properties of twist channel angular pressed aluminium. Mater. Charact. 2016, 119, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pástor, M.; Hagara, M.; Virgala, I.; Kal’avský, A.; Sapietová, A.; Hagarová, L. Design of a Unique Device for Residual Stresses Quantification by the Drilling Method Combining the PhotoStress and Digital Image Correlation. Materials 2021, 14, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Šofer, M.; Cienciala, J.; Fusek, M.; Pavlíček, P.; Moravec, R. Damage Analysis of Composite CFRP Tubes Using Acoustic Emission Monitoring and Pattern Recognition Approach. Materials 2021, 14, 786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, Z.; Chen, J.; Besnard, C.; Kunčická, L.; Kocich, R.; Korsunsky, A.M. In situ neutron diffraction investigation of texture-dependent Shape Memory Effect in a near equiatomic NiTi alloy. Acta Mater. 2021, 202, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mikula, P.; Ryukhtin, V.; Šaroun, J.; Strunz, P. High-Resolution Strain/Stress Measurements by Three-Axis Neutron Diffractometer. Materials 2020, 13, 5449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kunčická, L.; Halama, R.; Fusek, M. Special Issue: Selected Papers from Experimental Stress Analysis 2020. Materials 2021, 14, 1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14051136

AMA Style

Kunčická L, Halama R, Fusek M. Special Issue: Selected Papers from Experimental Stress Analysis 2020. Materials. 2021; 14(5):1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14051136

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kunčická, Lenka, Radim Halama, and Martin Fusek. 2021. "Special Issue: Selected Papers from Experimental Stress Analysis 2020" Materials 14, no. 5: 1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14051136

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop