You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
Materials
Download PDF
  • Editorial
  • Open Access

13 December 2021

Development of Mechanical, Corrosion Resistance, and Antibacterial Properties of Steels

Institute of Metals and Technology Ljubljana, Lepi pot 11, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Materials2021, 14(24), 7698;https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247698
This article belongs to the Special Issue Development of Mechanical, Corrosion Resistance, and Antibacterial Properties of Steels
Version Notes
Order Reprints
The total cost and environmental consequences of corrosion problems have become a major challenge to engineers [1]. Steel is known as an important engineering material, mostly it has high corrosion resistance combined with favorable mechanical properties [2,3]. For example, the high corrosion resistance of stainless steel is attributed to the presence of a passive film, which is stable, invisible, thin, durable and extremely adherent and self-repairing [4,5]. However, in many aggressive environments, such as a chloride-ion-rich environment or under physiological conditions, the surface is still observed to suffer from corrosion. For example, reinforced concrete structures require continuous monitoring and maintenance to prevent corrosion of the carbon steel reinforcement [6]. Therefore, in the past two decades, the modification of metallic surfaces by various coatings, organic or polymeric, has become part of an important procedure in enhancing particular surface properties, such as scratch resistance, oxidation, and corrosion [7].
Stainless steels are commonly used materials in biomedical applications also because of their good biocompatibility [8]. However, an increasing number of clinical procedures require the development of materials with superior performance and higher reliability [9]. The major issues in biomedical applications are related to understanding the relationship between the material’s surface properties and the cellular responses, accompanied by the risk of microbial infections [10]. The interaction of nanoscale surface topographies with cells was proven to play a crucial role in the biocompatibility of implants. Various nanoscale surface modifications have been proposed in order to enhance the biocompatibility and antibacterial activity of medical implants [7,11]. Biocompatible polymers, such as hydrophilic polyurethanes, poly(ethylene glycol), and poly(ethylene oxide) brushes, are known to reduce bacterial adhesion by alternating the physicochemical properties of the coating [12,13,14]. Epoxy resins are also extensively used to protect stainless steels because of their good chemical resistance, mechanical properties, strong adhesion with the substrate and corrosion protection by providing an effective physical barrier between the metal and the biological environment [15,16]. Mechanical properties in combination with biocompatibility can be further improved by adding nanoparticles into the epoxy resin, i.e., biocompatible TiO2 nanoparticles [7,17]. An alternative approach in modifying surface properties in terms of biocompatibility is treatment with highly reactive plasma, which may alter stainless steel topography, chemistry, and wettability under appropriate treatment conditions [18].
To conclude, the published papers indicate the scientific and technological relevance of the topics covered by the Special Issue. Therefore, this Special Issue represents an important contribution to the broader audience, which will result in an increased number of article readings as well as citations.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Potgieter, J.H.; Olubambi, P.A.; Cornish, L.; Machio, C.N.; Sherif, E.S.M. Influence of nickel additions on the corrosion behaviour of low nitrogen 22% Cr series duplex stainless steels. Corros. Sci. 2008, 50, 2572–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ibrahim, M.A.M.; el Rehim, S.S.A.; Hamza, M.M. Corrosion behavior of some austenitic stainless steels in chloride environments. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009, 115, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hryniewicz, T.; Rokicki, R.; Rokosz, K. Corrosion characteristics of medical-grade AISI Type 316L stainless steel surface after electropolishing in a magnetic field. Corrosion 2008, 64, 660–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Perez, C.; Collazo, A.; Izquierdo, M.; Merino, P.; Novoa, X.R. Characterisation of the barrier properties of different paint systems—Part I. Experimental set-up and ideal Fickian diffusion. Prog. Org. Coat. 1999, 36, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mujanović, E.; Zajec, B.; Kosec, T.; Legat, A.; Hönig, S.; Zehethofer, G.; Mori, G. Activation and Repassivation of Stainless Steels in Artificial Brines as a Function of pH. Materials 2019, 12, 3811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Gartner, N.; Kosec, T.; Legat, A. Monitoring the Corrosion of Steel in Concrete Exposed to a Marine Environment. Materials 2020, 13, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Conradi, M.; Kocijan, A.; Kosec, T.; Podgornik, B. Manipulation of TiO2 Nanoparticle/Polymer Coatings Wettability and Friction in Different Environments. Materials 2020, 13, 1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Yu, J.C.; Ho, W.K.; Lin, J.; Yip, K.Y.; Wong, P.K. Photocatalytic activity, antibacterial effect, and photoinduced hydrophilicity of TiO2 films coated on a stainless steel substrate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 2296–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Visai, L.; De Nardo, L.; Punta, C.; Melone, L.; Cigada, A.; Imbriani, M.; Arciola, C.R. Titanium oxide antibacterial surfaces in biomedical devices. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 2011, 34, 929–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Webb, K.; Hlady, V.; Tresco, P.A. Relative importance of surface wettability and charged functional groups on NIH 3T3 fibroblast attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1998, 41, 422–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lan, M.-Y.; Liu, C.-P.; Huang, H.-H.; Lee, S.-W. Both Enhanced Biocompatibility and Antibacterial Activity in Ag-Decorated TiO2 Nanotubes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kaper, H.J.; Busscher, H.J.; Norde, W. Characterization of poly(ethylene oxide) brushes on glass surfaces and adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Biomater. Sci. Ed. 2003, 14, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Minhas, B.; Dino, S.; Zuo, Y.; Qian, H.; Zhao, X. Improvement of Corrosion Resistance of TiO2 Layers in Strong Acidic Solutions by Anodizing and Thermal Oxidation Treatment. Materials 2021, 14, 1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kabel, K.I.; Labena, A.; Keshawy, M.; Hozzein, W.N. Progressive Applications of Hyperbranched Polymer Based on Diarylamine: Antimicrobial, Anti-Biofilm and Anti-Aerobic Corrosion. Materials 2020, 13, 2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Galliano, F.; Landolt, D. Evaluation of corrosion protection properties of additives for waterborne epoxy coatings on steel. Prog. Org. Coat. 2002, 44, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, F.W.; Yin, M.X.; Xiong, B.Y.; Zheng, F.; Mao, W.F.; Chen, Z.; He, C.; Zhao, X.; Fang, P. Evolution of microstructure of epoxy coating during UV degradation progress studied by slow positron annihilation spectroscopy and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 133, 283–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kocijan, A.; Conradi, M.; Hocevar, M. The Influence of Surface Wettability and Topography on the Bioactivity of TiO2/Epoxy Coatings on AISI 316L Stainless Steel. Materials 2019, 12, 1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Resnik, M.; Benčina, M.; Levičnik, E.; Rawat, N.; Iglič, A.; Junkar, I. Strategies for Improving Antimicrobial Properties of Stainless Steel. Materials 2020, 13, 2944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Download PDF
Design of a Non-Contact Radial Torque Sensor with Variable Torque Range by Electromagnetic Coil Coupling with Piezoelectric Sensor
Previous
In Vitro Wound Dressing Stack Model as a First Step to Evaluate the Behavior of Dressing Materials in Wound Bed—An Assessment of Mass Transport Phenomena in Hydrogel Wound Dressings
Next