Next Article in Journal
Hydrothermal Treatment of Arsenopyrite Particles with CuSO4 Solution
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Gd2O3 Addition on the Microstructure and Properties of Gd2O3-Yb2O3-Y2O3-ZrO2 (GYYZO) Ceramics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mössbauer Studies of Narrow Fractions of Fly Ash Formed after Combustion of Ekibastuz Coal

1
Institute of Nuclear Physics, Ibragimov st. 1, Almaty 050032, Kazakhstan
2
Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Dostyk Av. 13, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
3
Kazakh National Agrarian Research University, Abai Av. 8, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(23), 7473; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237473
Submission received: 21 October 2021 / Revised: 1 December 2021 / Accepted: 2 December 2021 / Published: 6 December 2021

Abstract

:
Nuclear gamma-resonance spectroscopy on 57Fe nuclei, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy have been used to study the narrow fractions of fly ash formed after combustion of the Ekibastuz coal. Two groups of samples of magnetic (ferrospheres) and non-magnetic type have been separated by granulometric and magnetic separation. A number of regularities associated with the granules size of fly ash have been established. According to the data of Mössbauer spectroscopy, a decrease in the magnetically ordered contribution has been identified with the growth of the particle size. After magnetic separation, iron in ferrospheres was found mainly in the structure of Fe3O4/γ-Fe2O3 and α-Fe2O3. The dominant phase was Fe3O4 (60–77%), the amount of which decreases with the growth of the grain size. With the growth of the particle size, the ratio of [Fe]tetra/[Fe]octa positions occupancy in Fe3O4 approaches 0.5; the structure of magnetite tends to the stoichiometric composition. α-Fe was found in the composition of ferrospheres, and a mechanism of its formation was proposed. The main components of the non-magnetic fractions of fly ash are mullite, hercynite, and silicate glass.

1. Introduction

Kazakhstan is a country with huge hydrocarbon reserves, and it occupies the 10th place in the world in terms of solid fuel reserves. The main source of fuel for thermal power plants (TPP) is the Ekibastuz coal basin, where coal is mined by the open method, which makes this type of solid fuel the cheapest, but it is characterized by a high ash content of ≈50% [1,2]. Therefore, a huge amount of the ash and slag mixture has been accumulated in the ash dumps of Kazakhstan, which creates a great threat to the environment [2,3,4]. It should be noted that with a sufficiently high level of the ash–slag waste production, only a small percentage of it is recycled. This leads to a rapid accumulation of waste from industrial coal combustion. In turn, it forces us to search for the ways of waste processing into valuable materials. The problems of ash–slag waste disposal in Russia, China, and Kazakhstan, where Ekibastuz coal is significant in the thermal power complex, were discussed in the works [3,4,5,6,7,8].
Currently, the ash–slag wastes are widely used in the construction industry [4,8,9] and road construction [10,11]. Ferrospheres and aluminosilicate microspheres in fly ashes are formed as a result of thermochemical and phase transformations during coal combustion [4,12,13,14]. Ferrospheres are the perspective materials for the development of catalysts for the reactions of oxidation of methane condensation and sorbents of liquid radioactive waste [12,13]. The most peculiar and valuable components of ash are cenospheres. They are hollow aluminosilicate balls of almost ideal shape with a smooth surface, from 10 to several hundred µm in diameter. Wall thickness is from 0.2 to 10 µm, Tmelt = 1400–1500 °C, density is 580–690 kg·m−3 [15,16,17]. The unique properties of cenospheres have led to a wide range of their application in the production of lightweight heat-insulating materials, radio-transparent ceramics, lightweight mixtures, etc. There are a number of factors affecting the formation of microspheres with different microstructures. The most important of them are the types of boilers and combustion conditions. So, in the paper [6], significant differences were established in the phase composition of fly ashes as well as their components, depending on the heat–power characteristics of the boilers.
Many papers have been devoted to the study of fly ashes. It is shown in [4,6,7,10,13,18] that the main magnetic components of fly ashes are magnetite Fe3O4 and hematite α-Fe2O3. In addition, the presence of γ-Fe2O3 in fly ash was discovered in [6,7]. Fly ashes contain the paramagnetic components as mullite [19,20] and hercynite [6,20], as well as silicate glasses and various calcium silicates with the impurities of iron [7,20]. However, in contrast to [6,20], the presence of hercynite in fly ash was not found in [18,19]. Despite the fairly extensive research, the interpretation of the physical–chemical properties of fly ashes is still required. This work includes a detailed study of the narrow fractions of fly ashes subjected to separate granulometric and magnetic separation. Nuclear gamma-resonance spectroscopy (Mössbauer effect) is used as the main method of research. This method, equipped with a modern mathematical instrument, is the most informative (and in some cases the only one) for identifying the iron-containing phases. The Mössbauer core serves as probe in a solid state. It can be used to study the dynamic properties; structural, valence, and charge states of the Mössbauer atom; the phase composition; and the atomic, crystalline, magnetic, and electronic features of the structure of the studied substance [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Separation into magnetic and non-magnetic components makes it possible to facilitate the analysis of the chemical and phase state of iron in individual fractions of fly ashes, which is enriched by separation [15].

2. Materials and Methods

Fly ash from a pulverized combustion of coal in the Ekibastuz basin in the boiler unit furnace BKZ-420-140 KA2 (Barnaul Boiler Plant, Barnaul, Russia) of TPP-2 in Almaty at a flame temperature of 1500–1900 °C was used as an initial product to obtain the narrow fractions. The ash was collected on the electrostatic filter. The particle size ranged from 0.2 to 500 μm. From the analysis of the literature data [1,5,29], it follows that the average particle size of fly ash is usually 50–100 µm. Taking this fact into account, the separation of narrow fractions of microspheres was carried out by the standard sieves with the mesh size of 25, 40, and 100 μm. Four series of samples were prepared in this way. The results of granulometric separation are shown in Table 1. Furthermore, magnetic separation of each of the obtained fractions was completed in two stages. At the first stage, a barium oxide magnet (ferroalloy BaOFe12O18) was used, creating a field strength of 700 Oe. This enabled us to separate non-magnetic parts in a pure form from the fractions produced by granulometric separation. At the second stage, the remaining magnetic parts of the fractions were subjected to more thorough separation using a permanent magnet with a low field strength of ≈50 Oe. So, if usually ferrospheres in fly ash are from 3 to 17 wt % [4], then by dry and wet magnetic separation, the content of magnetic concentrate can be increased to 95 wt % or more [15]. This method enabled us to separate the ferrospheres with high iron content and estimate the amount of paramagnetic impurity, which is mechanically bound (apparently sintered) with the magnetic part of the separated samples. Thus, two groups of the narrow fraction samples have been prepared: magnetic and non-magnetic types.
The chemical state of iron in the crystal structure of fly ash narrow fractions was determined by Mössbauer spectroscopy (MS) at 57Fe nuclei. The spectra were recorded in transmission geometry on a MS-1104Em spectrometer (Research Institute of Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia) at room temperature. 57Co in a chromium matrix served as a source of γ-quanta. The Mössbauer spectra were processed using the software SpectrRelax (Version 2.4, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia) [30]. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used as additional methods. The X-ray spectra were measured on a diffractometer Bruker D8 ADVANCE (Karlsruhe, Germany) with a Cu-Kα emitter in the Bragg–Brentano geometry. The card files ASTM and TCPDS were used to identify the crystalline phases. The morphology and elemental composition of fly ash narrow fractions was studied using a scanning electron microscope JEOL JSM-06610 (Tokyo, Japan) equipped with the IncaX-act energy dispersive analyzer with a resolution of 3 nm at accelerating voltage of 0.3–30 kV and accumulation time of 10 min. The elemental composition was recalculated for oxides; the amount was brought to 100%.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the Mössbauer spectra of the sample of Ekibastuz coal. As can be seen, the main component of the coal spectrum is the doublet belonging to Fe2+ in the crystal structure of siderite FeCO3. In addition to siderite, coal contains Fe3+ in the structure of pyrite FeS2 (13 ± 1% of total spectrum). Thus, pyrite and siderite are the main precursors in the formation of ferrospheres during coal combustion. The mineral part of the Ekibastuz coal also contains clay minerals of the composition of kaolinite Al2Si2O3(OH)4, quartz α-SiO2, and carbonate CaCO3 [12]. In [31,32], magnetite was found as an impurity in coal, but the traces of this mineral were not found in this work.
Figure 2 shows the Mössbauer spectrum of the sample of fly ash after the combustion of Ekibastuz coal and restored distributions of hyperfine magnetic field p(Hn). As can be seen, the ash composition differs significantly from the original mineral components due to their significant changes under the influence of high temperatures. At the temperature of 585 °C, siderite, the content of which is ≈10% in the Ekibastuz coal [12], decomposes with the release of carbon dioxide CO2 and the formation of iron and its oxides, depending on the partial pressure of O2, CO, and CO2. Pyrite also decomposes with the subsequent oxidation of iron [6]. According to the data of chemical analysis, the main components of ash and slag are SiO (45–60%), Al2O3 (15–25%), Fe2O3 (5–15%), CaO (1.5–4.5%), and K2O (2.0–4.5%) [1].
As can be seen, the experimental Mössbauer spectrum of the fly ash is characterized by a rather complicated structure. The iron atoms occupy several positions in magnetically ordered and paramagnetic states. The spectrum cannot be described by a small discrete set of partial spectra. Therefore, for processing of the experimental data, distributions of hyperfine parameters were applied in the evaluation of the Mössbauer spectra [30]. The relative Χ2 was 1.17 ± 0.06.
Table 2 shows the Mössbauer parameters of the magnetic part of the MS spectrum of fly ash. The magnetic part of the spectrum consists of five sextets. The sextet S1 is characterized by the parameters inherent to hematite α-Fe2O3. The sextet S2 is defined by Fe3+ ions in the tetrahedral position of Fe3O4. The sextet S3 corresponds to Fe3+ ions, and the sextets S4–S5 correspond to Fe2+ ions in the octahedral position of Fe3O4. The presence of two types of sextets S3 and S4–S5 is associated with the significant non-stoichiometry of magnetite. As it is known, the ratio of tetrahedral position occupancy to octahedral position occupancy is [Fe]tetra/[Fe]octa = 0.5 for stoichiometric magnetite [33]. Electronic exchange is disturbed in case of non-stoichiometric magnetite Fe3O4. The sextet from Fe in the octahedral position decomposes into several non-equivalent states, and the Mössbauer spectrum gets a rather complex structure. In the literature, the spectrum of non-stoichiometric magnetite is often decomposed into three sextets: Fe3+ in the tetrahedral position, and Fe3+ and Fe2+ in the octahedral position. However, in practice, the picture is much more complicated, which is associated with the conditions of magnetite formation. The ratio [Fe]tetra/[Fe]octa is disturbed. The reasons for this disturbance are either isomorphic impurities in the octahedral position of Fe3O4, or the admixture of maghemite (and/or other impurities with close Mössbauer parameters) to magnetite. The isomorphic capacity of Fe3O4 is largely a function of temperature. At high temperatures, magnetite is able to capture the impurities of a number of elements [6]. In the present experiment, [Fe]tetra/[Fe]octa = 0.72.
The paramagnetic part of the fly ash spectrum was processed by two distributions of the quadrupole displacement, separately for Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions with the relative spectral areas 34.0 ± 0.9% and 30.4 ± 0.9%, respectively.
Figure 3 shows the X-ray diffraction pattern of fly ash. The reflections of quartz SiO2 (Q), magnetite Fe3O4 (Mg), hematite α-Fe2O3 (Hm), mullite Al6Si2O13 (Mu), and hercynite FeAl2O4 (He) are observed against the background of a halo, indicating the presence of the amorphous phase.
Figure 4 shows the Mössbauer spectra of the samples of fly ash narrow fractions produced after granulometric separation. It is easy to see that a decrease in the magnetic component is observed with the growth of the granule size. In a sample with a particle size of more than 100 μm, the content of ferroxides is minimal; the paramagnetic components are predominant. The distribution of iron over magnetically ordered and paramagnetic phases in the Mössbauer spectra of fly ash narrow fractions is presented in Table 3.
To study ferrospheres and aluminosilicate microspheres, the fractions separated from fly ash by the granulometric method were subjected to magnetic separation. Figure 5 shows the Mössbauer spectra of the samples of narrow magnetic fractions that resulted from the second stage of magnetic separation. Table 4 shows the Mössbauer parameters of the magnetic phases for the spectrum of the sample with particles less than 25 μm. Table 5 shows the distribution of iron over magnetically ordered phases versus particle size. It can be seen that iron in ferrospheres is found mainly in the structure of Fe3O4/γ-Fe2O3 and α-Fe2O3. Moreover, the dominant phase is Fe3O4 (60–77%), the amount of which decreases with the growth of the granule size. This is associated with the fact that Fe3O4 is formed from α-Fe2O3 at temperatures above 1400 °C. Probably, the equimolar oxidation of Fe3O4 to γ-Fe2O3 occurs upon cooling from high temperatures. Moreover, this process occurs in smaller granules that have greater contact with the oxidizing atmosphere in the heating unit.
In addition to the magnetically ordered state, the samples contain Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in a paramagnetic structure. In accordance with [4,7,12], mullite crystals are precipitated on the surface of shells and inside the globules of magnetic microspheres with a high aluminum content. It follows from [6] that the paramagnetic part of the spectrum of magnetic microspheres also contains mullite. In addition, there is hercynite and aluminosilicate glass with the admixture of iron.
Natural metallic iron was not detected in the Mössbauer spectrum of the fly ash sample before magnetic separation. Apparently, this is caused by the very low content of α-Fe for its identification in such a complex spectrum of fly ash. This became possible in the spectra of the separated magnetic samples. In the spectra of the samples of fly ash narrow fractions, in addition to α-Fe2O3 and Fe3O4, there is a small amount of α-Fe. Iron reduction is in principle possible when the particles pass through a flare zone with a reducing atmosphere. In the combustion unit, both oxidizing and reducing atmosphere are formed, depending on the amount of oxide and carbon dioxide in the gas mixture. If the CO2/CO ratio is greater than a certain value, then iron will be reduced to metal, which is followed by encapsulation into aluminosilicate or ferrosphere globules.
One more interesting experimental fact draws attention. Table 6 shows the ratio of [Fe]tetra/[Fe]octa positions occupancy in Fe3O4 in the spectra of the narrow magnetic fraction samples. It can be seen that with the growth of particle size above 40 μm, the ratio [Fe]tetra/[Fe]octa decreases; the structure of magnetite tends to the stoichiometric composition, which can be explained by the fact that fine particles can contain Fe3O4/γ-Fe2O3 and isomorphic impurities in the octahedral position of magnetite. Small particles will have a higher oxidation rate due to greater contact with the gaseous oxidizing atmosphere, which is consistent with [7].
In addition to the magnetically ordered phases, the narrow magnetic fractions of fly ash contain a paramagnetic impurity mechanically bound to the magnetic part, and its content increases with the growth of the particle size.
Figure 6 shows the Mössbauer spectra of the samples of narrow non-magnetic fractions. Taking into account the similarity of the spectra of the samples with the particles of different sizes, Table 7 shows the Mössbauer parameters only for the spectrum of the sample with the particles less than 25 μm. The MS spectrum was processed by model decoding using seven doublets. D1–D3 doublets are caused by Fe2+ ions in the tetrahedral environment and Fe2+, Fe3+ ions in the octahedral environment in the hercynite crystal lattice. The D4–D6 doublets characterize Fe3+ ions in the octahedral environment and Fe3+, Fe2+ ions in the tetrahedral environment in the mullite crystal lattice. D7 doublet refers to Fe2+ in the octahedral environment of silicate glass [6,19]. Table 8 shows the phase composition of the narrow non-magnetic fractions.
The paramagnetic impurity mechanically bound to the magnetic part of the separated samples (see Figure 5) is identical in quality to the non-magnetic fraction of fly ash, the main components of which are mullite, hercynite, and silicate glass.
Figure 7 shows the SEM images of magnetic (a) and non-magnetic (b) fly ash fractions with particle size less than 25 μm. Table 9 and Table 10 show the elemental composition of the particles marked on the SEM images. Figure 7a shows a cluster of nearly perfect spherical globules of various sizes. As the particle size decreases, their spheroidality improves. There are globules with both smooth and embossed surfaces. The iron content in them varies from 37.43 to 85.26 wt %, the content of aluminum is from 1.76 to 14 wt %, and the content of silicon is from 3.52 to 22.53 wt %. It can be seen from Table 6 that in the magnetic narrow fractions of fly ash with the granule size less than 25 μm, the ratio of positions occupancy [Fe]tetra/[Fe]octa = 1.16 ± 0.08. Such a significant violation of stoichiometry in magnetite cannot be provided by isomorphic impurities. The content of magnesium and calcium in the magnetic fractions with granule size less than 25 μm is higher than in the magnetic fractions of granules of larger sizes. In addition, the content of magnesium in the magnetic fraction is significantly higher than in the non-magnetic fraction. Apparently, these elements are precursors in the formation of magnesium ferrites, which can contribute to the Mössbauer spectrum of the magnetic fraction of the finely dispersed granules of fly ash. Particles of the non-magnetic fraction are mostly of indefinite shape (Figure 7b), silicon is the predominant element in them—from 53.84 to 66.67 wt %.
Thus, the study of granular narrow fractions by the SEM method made it possible to confirm, and in some cases to clarify, the conclusions made according to the results of Mössbauer studies.

4. Conclusions

The studies of the narrow fractions of fly ash resulted from combustion of Ekibastuz coal have been completed. Two groups of samples of the magnetic and non-magnetic type with the grain size less than 25 μm, 25–40 μm, 40–100 μm, and more than 100 μm were identified by granulometric and magnetic separation. Several regularities have been revealed related to the size of granules and the phase composition of the narrow fractions of fly ash.
According to MS data, after granulometric separation, a decrease in the magnetically ordered contribution was established with the growth of the particle size. In the sample with a particle size of more than 100 μm, the content of ferroxides is minimal; the minerals mullite and hercynite are predominant. Labeled magnetic particles less than 25 µm in size can be used as indicators in those fields of ferrospheres application, where materials with strong magnetic properties are required.
After magnetic separation, iron in ferrospheres is found mainly in the structure of Fe3O4/γ-Fe2O3 and α-Fe2O3. Moreover, the dominant phase is Fe3O4 (60–77%), the amount of which decreases with the growth of the granules size. It was found that with the growth of the particle size, the ratio of the positions occupancy [Fe]tetra/[Fe]octa in Fe3O4 approaches 0.5; the structure of magnetite tends to the stoichiometric composition. This is caused by the fact that Fe3O4 is formed from α-Fe2O3 at the temperatures above 1400 °C. Probably, equimolar oxidation of Fe3O4 to γ-Fe2O3 occurs upon cooling from high temperatures. Moreover, this process occurs in smaller granules that have greater contact with the oxidizing atmosphere in the heating unit. α-Fe was found in the composition of ferrospheres, and a mechanism of its formation was proposed. The paramagnetic impurity, which is mechanically bound to the magnetic part of the separated samples by its qualitative composition, is identical to the non-magnetic fraction of fly ash, the main components of which are mullite, hercynite, and silicate glass. The content of paramagnetic impurity in the magnetic fraction increases with the growth of the particle size.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S., S.S. and M.V.; methodology, formal analysis and writing—original draft preparation, M.V. and I.M.; investigation and writing—review and editing, A.S., M.V. and I.M.; visualization, I.M.; project administration, A.S. and M.V.; resources, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University (Order 04-04/97 dated 6 April 2021).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Vladimir Yaskevich for assistance provided in the experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kizilshtein, L.Y. Traces of coal-fired power industry. Sci. Life 2008, 5, 42–47. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adeeva, L.N.; Borbat, V.F. Heating and power plant ash—The promising raw materials for the industry. Bull. Omsk Univ. 2009, 2, 141–151. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zorya, V.N.; Korovushkinm, V.V.; Permyakov, A.A.; Volynkina, E.P. The research of the mineral composition and crystal structure of iron-containing components of technogenic waste of the metallurgical complex. Izv. Vyss. Uchebnykh Zavedenij Chernaya Metall. 2015, 58, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Zyryanov, V.V.; Petrov, S.A.; Matvienko, A.A. Characterization of spinel and magnetospheres of coal fly ashes collected in power plants in the former USSR. Fuel 2011, 90, 486–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Samorokov, V.E.; Zelinskaya, E.V. Use of micro-spheres in composite materials. Bull. Irkutsk State Univ. 2012, 9, 201–205. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shokanov, A.; Vereshchak, M.; Manakova, I. Mössbauer and X-ray Studies of Phase Composition of Fly Ashes Formed after Combustion of Ekibastuz Coal (Kazakhstan). Metals 2020, 10, 929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zyryanov, V.; Zhang, J.; Zhenga, C. Physical–chemical characteristics and elements enrichment of magnetospheres from coal fly ashes. Fuel 2014, 135, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zyryanov, V.V.; Zyryanov, D.V. Fly Ash—Technogenic Raw Material; IIC Maska: Moscow, Russia, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  9. Vatin, N.I.; Petrosov, D.V.; Kalachev, A.I.; Lahtinen, P. Use of ashes and ash-and-slad wastes in construction. J. Civil Eng. 2011, 22, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kizilshtein, L.; Dubov, I.; Shpitsgluz, A.; Parada, S. Components of Ashes and Slags of Heat Power Plants; Energoatomizdat: Moscow, Russia, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  11. Putilin, E.I.; Tsvetkov, B.C. Application of Fly Ash and Ash and Slag Mixtures in the Construction of Highways; SoyuzDorNII: Moscow, Russia, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sharonova, O.M.; Fedorchak, M.A.; Mazurova, E.V. The composition and structure of ferrospheres formed by industrial combustion of Ekibastuz coal. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Chem. 2017, 10, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Anshits, N.N.; Solov’ev, L.A.; Rabchevskii, E.V.; Anshits, A.G.; Bayukov, O.A.; Eremin, E.V. Mössbauer and magnetic investigations of high-iron samples of energy ashes. Phys. Solid State 2010, 52, 1188–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sharonova, O.M.; Anshits, N.N.; Solovyov, L.A.; Salanov, A.N.; Anshits, A.G. Relationship between composition and structure of globules in narrow fractions of ferrospheres. Fuel 2013, 111, 332–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vereshchagina, T.A.; Anshits, N.N.; Zykova, I.D.; Salanov, A.N.; Tret’yakov, A.A.; Anshits, A.G. Preparation of cenospheres of controlled composition from energy ashes and their properties. Khim. Interes. Ust. Razv. 2001, 9, 379–391. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fomenko, E.V.; Anshits, N.N.; Vasil’eva, N.G.; Rogovenko, E.S.; Mikhaylova, O.A.; Mazurova, E.V.; Solov’ev, L.A.; Anshits, A.G. Composition and structure of the shells of aluminosilicate microspheres in fly ash formed on the combustion of Ekibastuz coal. Solid Fuel Chem. 2016, 50, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fedorchak, M.A.; Sharonova, O.M.; Mazurova, Y.V.; Vereshchagina, T.A.; Anshits, A.G. Magnetic affine sorbents for the isolation of recombinant proteins. Inorg. Mater. Appl. Res. 2016, 7, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Harchand, K.S.; Taneja, S.P.; Raj, D.; Sharma, P. Mössbauer studies of coal ash. Fuel Process. Technol. 1989, 21, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hinckley, C.C.; Smith, G.V.; Twardowska, H.; Saporoschenko, M.; Shiley, R.H.; Griffen, R.A. Mossbauer studies of iron in Lurgi gasification ashes and power plant fly and bottom ash. Fuel 1980, 59, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vandenberghe, R.E.; de Resende, V.G.; da Costa, G.M.; De Grave, E. Study of loss-on-ignition anomalies found in ashes from combustion of iron-rich coal. Fuel 2010, 89, 2405–2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Goldanskii, V.; Herber, R. Chemical Applications of Mössbauer Spectroscopy; Academic: New York, NY, USA, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kierlik, P.; Hanc-Kuczkowska, A.; Rachwał, M.; Męczyński, R.; Matuła, I. Application of Mössbauer spectroscopy for identification of iron-containing components in upper silesian topsoil being under industrial anthropopressure. Materials 2020, 13, 5206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mehrabi-Kalajahi, S.; Varfolomeev, M.A.; Yuan, C.; Rodionov, N.O.; Zinnatullin, A.L.; Vagizov, F.G.; Osin, Y.N. Oil-Dispersed α-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles as a catalyst for improving heavy oil oxidation. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 10498–10511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Manakova, I.A.; Vereshchak, M.F.; Sergeeva, L.S.; Shokanov, A.K.; Antonyuk, V.I.; Rusakov, V.S.; Kadyrzhanov, K.K. Laws of thermally induced formation of phases in α-Fe with a titanium coating upon isochronous annealings. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 2010, 109, 447–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kadyrzhanov, K.K.; Vereshchak, M.F.; Manakova, I.A.; Ozernoy, A.N.; Rusakov, V.S. Structure-phase transformations in the Be-Fe-Be layered system subjected to irradiation and thermal treatment. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2013, 74, 1078–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Andrianov, V.A.; Bedelbekova, K.A.; Ozernoy, A.N.; Vereshchak, M.F.; Manakova, I.A. Mössbauer studies of 57Fe implantation in metal Ta and Mo. Nuclear Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms. 2020, 475, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shokanov, A.K.; Vereshchak, M.F.; Manakova, I.A.; Bedelbekova, K.A.; Yaskevich, V.I. Mössbauer Study of Iron Carbides Formed by Thermal Vacuum Deposition Shokanov. Crystallogr. Rep. 2020, 65, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vereshchak, M.F.; Manakova, I.A.; Shokanov, A.K.; Suslov, E.E.; Tleubergenov, Z.K.; Smikhan, Y.A. Scanning conversion electronic Mössbauer spectroscopy of local surface layers of materials. Nuclear Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms. 2021, 502, 102–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fisher, G.L.; Chang, D.P.Y.; Brumer, M. Fly ash collected from electrostatic precipitators: Microcrystalline structure and the mystery of the spheres. Science 1976, 192, 553–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Matsnev, M.E.; Rusakov, V.S. SpectrRelax: An application for Mössbauer spectra modeling and fitting. AIP Conf. Proc. 2012, 1489, 178–185. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shpirt, M.J.; Clair, V.R.; Persikov, I.Z. Inorganic Components of Solid Fuels; Publishing House Khimija: Moscow, Russia, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  32. Vdovenko, M.I. The Mineral Part of Energy Coals (Physicochemical Research); Nauka: Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gomes, S.; Francois, M.; Abdelmoula, M.; Refait, P.; Pelissier, C.; Evrard, O. Characterization of magnetite in silico-aluminous fly ash by SEM, TEM, XRD, magnetic susceptibility, and Mossbauer spectroscopy. Cem. Concr. Res. 1999, 29, 1705–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. MS spectra of 57Fe nuclei of the Ekibastuz coal sample: siderite (pink); pyrite (purple).
Figure 1. MS spectra of 57Fe nuclei of the Ekibastuz coal sample: siderite (pink); pyrite (purple).
Materials 14 07473 g001
Figure 2. MS spectrum of 57Fe nuclei of the fly ash sample and restored distributions of hyperfine magnetic field p(Hn): hematite (red); magnetite (yellow and magenta); the paramagnetic minerals (blue and green).
Figure 2. MS spectrum of 57Fe nuclei of the fly ash sample and restored distributions of hyperfine magnetic field p(Hn): hematite (red); magnetite (yellow and magenta); the paramagnetic minerals (blue and green).
Materials 14 07473 g002
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of the fly ash sample.
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of the fly ash sample.
Materials 14 07473 g003
Figure 4. MS spectra of 57Fe nuclei of the samples of fly ash narrow fractions with a particle size of less than 25 µm (a), 25–40 µm (b), 40–100 µm (c), and more than 100 µm (d): hematite (red); magnetite (yellow and magenta); paramagnetic minerals (blue and green).
Figure 4. MS spectra of 57Fe nuclei of the samples of fly ash narrow fractions with a particle size of less than 25 µm (a), 25–40 µm (b), 40–100 µm (c), and more than 100 µm (d): hematite (red); magnetite (yellow and magenta); paramagnetic minerals (blue and green).
Materials 14 07473 g004
Figure 5. MS spectra of 57Fe nuclei of the samples of narrow magnetic fractions of fly ash with a particle size of less than 25 µm (a), 25–40 µm (b), 40–100 µm (c), and more than 100 µm (d): hematite (red); magnetite (yellow and magenta); the paramagnetic minerals (blue and green).
Figure 5. MS spectra of 57Fe nuclei of the samples of narrow magnetic fractions of fly ash with a particle size of less than 25 µm (a), 25–40 µm (b), 40–100 µm (c), and more than 100 µm (d): hematite (red); magnetite (yellow and magenta); the paramagnetic minerals (blue and green).
Materials 14 07473 g005
Figure 6. MS spectra of 57Fe nuclei of the samples of narrow non-magnetic fractions of fly ash with a particle size of less than 25 µm (a), 25–40 µm (b), 40–100 µm (c), and more than 100 µm (d): mullite (green, blue, and red); hercynite (powder blue, yellow, and brown); silicate (magenta).
Figure 6. MS spectra of 57Fe nuclei of the samples of narrow non-magnetic fractions of fly ash with a particle size of less than 25 µm (a), 25–40 µm (b), 40–100 µm (c), and more than 100 µm (d): mullite (green, blue, and red); hercynite (powder blue, yellow, and brown); silicate (magenta).
Materials 14 07473 g006
Figure 7. SEM images of magnetic (a) and non-magnetic (b) narrow fractions of fly ash with a particle size less than 25 μm.
Figure 7. SEM images of magnetic (a) and non-magnetic (b) narrow fractions of fly ash with a particle size less than 25 μm.
Materials 14 07473 g007
Table 1. Content of narrow fractions in fly ash after granulometric separation.
Table 1. Content of narrow fractions in fly ash after granulometric separation.
Particle Size, µmContent, wt %
<257.60
25 ÷ 4017.27
40 ÷ 10036.80
>10038.33
Table 2. Hyperfine parameters of the magnetic phases obtained from the MS spectrum of fly ash.
Table 2. Hyperfine parameters of the magnetic phases obtained from the MS spectrum of fly ash.
SubspectrumI, %δ, mm/s, mm/sHn, kOeAssignment
S13.3 ± 0.90.39 ± 0.02−0.09 ± 0.04516 ± 1Hematite
S213.5 ± 0.90.33 ± 0.010.01 ± 0.01485 ± 1Magnetite [Fe3+]tetra
S311.0 ± 0.70.53 ± 0.01−0.04 ± 0.01459 ± 2Magnetite [Fe3+]octa
S45.4 ± 0.40.58 ± 0.010.09 ± 0.01429 ± 2Magnetite [Fe2+]octa
S52.4 ± 0.30.66 ± 0.020.28 ± 0.04384 ± 2Magnetite [Fe2+]octa
I: relative spectral area; δ: isomer shift relative to metallic iron at 300 K; ε: quadrupole shift; Hn: hyperfine field at 57Fe nuclei at maximum of the distribution.
Table 3. Distribution of iron over magnetically ordered (Im) and paramagnetic (Ipm) phases in narrow fractions of fly ash.
Table 3. Distribution of iron over magnetically ordered (Im) and paramagnetic (Ipm) phases in narrow fractions of fly ash.
Particle Size, µmIm, %Ipm, %
<2562 ± 438 ± 2
25 ÷ 4055 ± 345 ± 1
40 ÷ 10037 ± 263 ± 1
>10019 ± 181 ± 1
Table 4. Hyperfine parameters of the magnetic phases obtained from the MS spectrum of the sample with the particles less than 25 μm.
Table 4. Hyperfine parameters of the magnetic phases obtained from the MS spectrum of the sample with the particles less than 25 μm.
SubspectrumI, %δ, mm/s, mm/sHn, kOeAssignment
S14.9 ± 0.80.37 ± 0.01−0.09 ± 0.01514 ± 2Hematite
S241.5 ± 0.90.29 ± 0.01−0.04 ± 0.01487 ± 2Magnetite [Fe3+]tetra
S314.2 ± 0.90.68 ± 0.010.01 ± 0.01463 ± 2Magnetite [Fe3+]octa
S415.1 ± 0.90.65 ± 0.010.02 ± 0.01436 ± 3Magnetite [Fe2+]octa
S56.4 ± 0.70.59 ± 0.020.05 ± 0.01399 ± 3Magnetite [Fe2+]octa
S62.1 ± 0.60.00 ± 0.030.09 ± 0.01329 ± 2α-Fe
Table 5. Distribution of iron over magnetically ordered phases in the magnetic narrow fractions of fly ash.
Table 5. Distribution of iron over magnetically ordered phases in the magnetic narrow fractions of fly ash.
Particle Size, µmα-Fe, %α-Fe2O3, %Fe3O4/γ-Fe2O3, %
<252 ± 15 ± 177 ± 3
25–403 ± 14 ± 174 ± 3
40–1001 ± 14 ± 160 ± 2
>1001 ± 13 ± 161 ± 5
Table 6. The ratio of the positions occupancy in Fe3O4.
Table 6. The ratio of the positions occupancy in Fe3O4.
Particle Size, µm[Fe]tetra/[Fe]octa
<251.16 ± 0.08
25–400.88 ± 0.06
40–1000.46 ± 0.04
>1000.47 ± 0.09
Table 7. Hyperfine parameters of the non-magnetic fraction obtained from the MS spectrum of the sample with the particles less than 25 μm.
Table 7. Hyperfine parameters of the non-magnetic fraction obtained from the MS spectrum of the sample with the particles less than 25 μm.
SubspectrumI, %δ, mm/sΔ, mm/sAssignment
D117.0 ± 0.31.20 ± 0.031.70 ± 0.06Hercynite [Fe2+]tetra
D23.1 ± 0.11.41 ± 0.092.26 ± 0.09Hercynite [Fe2+]octa
D32.0 ± 0.10.30 ± 0.090.80 ± 0.09Hercynite [Fe3+]octa
D437.3 ± 0.90.32 ± 0.021.14 ± 0.06Mullite [Fe3+]octa
D513.1 ± 0.20.33 ± 0.030.62 ± 0.04Mullite [Fe3+]tetra
D65.6 ± 0.10.80 ± 0.091.76 ± 0.09Mullite [Fe2+]tetra
D721.9 ± 0.41.14 ± 0.022.04 ± 0.02Silicate [Fe2+]octa
Δ: quadrupole splitting.
Table 8. Phase composition (%) of narrow non-magnetic fractions.
Table 8. Phase composition (%) of narrow non-magnetic fractions.
Particle Size, µmHercyniteMulliteSilicates
<2522 ± 156 ± 122 ± 1
25–4023 ± 154 ± 123 ± 1
40–10027 ± 147 ± 226 ± 1
>10026 ± 149 ± 125 ± 1
Table 9. Elemental composition (wt %) of narrow magnetic fraction of fly ash with a particle size less than 25 μm.
Table 9. Elemental composition (wt %) of narrow magnetic fraction of fly ash with a particle size less than 25 μm.
ParticleMgOAl2O3SiO2P2O5SO3CaOTiO2MnOFe2O3
15.011.763.520.670.801.060.001.9285.26
23.083.3519.681.670.122.480.261.8067.55
35.8214.0022.535.830.0013.210.200.9937.43
Table 10. Elemental composition (wt %) of narrow non-magnetic fraction of fly ash with a particle size less than 25 μm.
Table 10. Elemental composition (wt %) of narrow non-magnetic fraction of fly ash with a particle size less than 25 μm.
ParticleNa2OMgOAl2O3SiO2P2O5SO3K2OCaOTiO2MnOFe2O3Cu2OZnO
10.961.5813.4761.65 1.080.834.680.290.2911.710.410.49
20.650.8219.9966.670.280.260.862.680.670.426.290.33
30.740.5828.4153.840.94 0.791.621.220.3111.250.25
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vereshchak, M.; Manakova, I.; Shokanov, A.; Sakhiyev, S. Mössbauer Studies of Narrow Fractions of Fly Ash Formed after Combustion of Ekibastuz Coal. Materials 2021, 14, 7473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237473

AMA Style

Vereshchak M, Manakova I, Shokanov A, Sakhiyev S. Mössbauer Studies of Narrow Fractions of Fly Ash Formed after Combustion of Ekibastuz Coal. Materials. 2021; 14(23):7473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237473

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vereshchak, Mikhail, Irina Manakova, Adilkhan Shokanov, and Sayabek Sakhiyev. 2021. "Mössbauer Studies of Narrow Fractions of Fly Ash Formed after Combustion of Ekibastuz Coal" Materials 14, no. 23: 7473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237473

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop