Next Article in Journal
Effect of the Crack Tip Bifurcation on the Plasticity-Induced Fatigue Propagation in Metallic Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Various Criteria Determining the Direction of Crack Propagation Using the UDMGINI User Procedure Implemented in Abaqus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 12
10.3390/ma14123386
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Benzo[h]quinolin-10-ol Derivatives as Co-sensitizers for DSSCs

by
Aneta Slodek
1,
Paweł Gnida
2,
Jan Grzegorz Małecki
1,
Grażyna Szafraniec-Gorol
1,
Pavel Chulkin
3,
Marharyta Vasylieva
2,
Jacek Nycz
1,
Marcin Libera
1 and
Ewa Schab-Balcerzak
1,2,*
1
Institute of Chemistry, University of Silesia, 9 Szkolna Str., 40-006 Katowice, Poland
2
Centre of Polymer and Carbon Materials, Polish Academy of Sciences, 34 M. Curie-Skłodowska Str., 41-819 Zabrze, Poland
3
Faculty of Chemistry, Silesian University of Technology, 9 Strzody Str., 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(12), 3386; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123386
Submission received: 12 May 2021 / Revised: 15 June 2021 / Accepted: 16 June 2021 / Published: 18 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Electronic Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
New benzo[h]quinolin-10-ol derivatives with one or two 2-cyanoacrylic acid units were synthesized with a good yield in a one-step condensation reaction. Chemical structure and purity were confirmed using NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis, respectively. The investigation of their thermal, electrochemical and optical properties was carried out based on differential scanning calorimetry, cyclic voltammetry, electronic absorption and photoluminescence measurements. The analysis of the optical, electrochemical and properties was supported by density functional theory studies. The synthesized molecules were applied in dye-sensitized solar cells as sensitizers and co-sensitizers with commercial N719. The thickness and surface morphology of prepared photoanodes was studied using optical, scanning electron and atomic force microscopes. Due to the utilization of benzo[h]quinolin-10-ol derivatives as co-sensitizers, the better photovoltaic performance of fabricated devices compared to a reference cell based on a neat N719 was demonstrated. Additionally, the effect of co-adsorbent chemical structure (cholic acid, deoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid) on DSSC efficiency was explained based on the density functional theory.

1. Introduction

Much attention is currently being paid to renewable energy sources. This is related to increasing environmental pollution, the gradual depletion of fossil resources and environmental degradation. One of the most promising renewable energy sources is solar energy, which can be used for heating or converted into electricity [1]. It is worth paying particular attention to photovoltaics (PV), which have been widely and intensively developed in recent years [2,3,4]. In addition to well-known inorganic materials, organic materials are intensively tested in PV devices. Increased research on third generation PV cells accompanied the discovery and development of the first dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) in 1991 [5]. However, the DSSCs became more popular around the year 2000 when their efficiency exceeded 10% [6]. Additionally, they are gaining popularity and are constantly being researched due to their economic advantages: low cost of fabrication, high power conversion efficiency, and relatively straightforward procedures of manufacturing [5,7]. It is worth noting that the DSSC cell consists of several key elements, including the dye used. The dye is responsible for absorbing incident photons and injecting electrons into the TiO2 conduction band [8]. Currently, metal-containing complexes such as N3, N719, N749 based on Ru or YD2 with Zn are mainly utilized to prepare dye-sensitized solar cells [9,10,11,12]. However, metal-containing dyes are expensive to obtain and the purification process is very complicated and tedious [13,14,15,16]. Therefore, research is being carried out to reduce the use of sensitizers containing metal atoms by looking for new metal-free dyes that are cheaper and easier to synthesize. Organic sensitizers are used in exchange for metal-dyes or as a co-sensitizer to reduce the amount of commercial dyes used. Very important at the design level are the properties that the new dye should exhibit, including good solubility in solvents, wide absorption range of sunlight, high molar coefficient, resistance to photodegradation and photocorrosion, thermal and electrochemical stability, and appropriate alignment of the frontier molecular orbital energy levels [17,18,19,20,21,22]. It was found that co-sensitization using two or more sensitizers is an effective approach to achieve highlight harvesting efficiency [23,24]. Two groups of DSSC can be specified. The first one is based on two dyes, one of which is a new metal-free dye, and the other is a commercial metal-containing sensitizer, which is often Ru (e.g., N719, N3, HD-2) [7,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. It is worth noting that these PV cells exhibit higher efficiencies than devices containing only commercial dye in most cases. Even if the efficiencies are comparable or slightly lower than those of the reference DSSC, a correspondingly less amount of metal-dye amount is used, which reduces the cost of preparing the solar cell [33,34,35]. The second group constitutes DSSC, sensitized only, with new metal-free dyes [33,35,36,37,38,39,40,41].
Herein, two new benzo[h]quinolin-10-ol cyanoacrylic acid derivatives are presented for use as co-sensitizers with commercial N719 dye in DSSC devices. The properties of new compounds based on thermal, UV-vis, photoluminescence, and cyclic voltammetry measurements are determined. Additionally, functional density theory (DFT) estimates the frontier molecular orbitals of the synthesized molecules, UV-vis spectra adsorbed on TiO2, and binding energies of the dyes on TiO2 applied. Moreover, the impact of the chemical structure of typically used adsorbents, such as chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), cholic acid (CA), and deoxycholic acid (DCA) on device performance based on N719 was explained by DFT. The fabricated devices were characterized by the current density-voltage (J-V) curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). It was demonstrated that the new simple molecules, applied as co-sensitizer with N719, allowed us to obtain higher or comparable efficiencies to reference cells based only on expensive N719 dye.

2. Experimental

All chemicals were commercially available and were used without further purification. 10-Hydroxybenzo[h]quinoline-9-carboxaldehyde and 10-hydroxybenzo[h]quinoline-7,9-dicarboxaldehyde were synthesized, as has been reported [42]. The chemicals, instrumental equipment applied for synthesized compounds and solar cells characterization and DSSC preparations are presented in Supplementary Material.

2.1. Computational Details

All theoretical calculations were performed using Gaussian 16, Revision C.01, program package [43] at DFT or TD-DFT level. The singlet state geometry optimizations, frequency and electronic transition calculations were made with the use of B3LYP functional [44,45] with the 6-31G(d,p) basis set [46]. Calculations were made in the gas phase except for the absorption electronic spectra of 1a, 2a compounds (Figure S3) in addition to the PCM model [47], with DMF as a solvent. The density of states diagrams (Figure S13) was obtained with GaussSum [48]. The adsorption energies (Eads) of the dyes were evaluated using the following expression, Eads = Edye + ETiO2 − Edye@TiO2, where Edye, ETiO2 and Edye@TiO2 are the energies of dye, TiO2, and total system (dye@TiO2). The Gibbs free energies of the dye@TiO2 species were calculated at 298.15 K.

2.2. Synthesis of Cyanoacrylic Acids 10-Hydroxobenzo[h]Quinoline Derivatives

Carboxaldehyde and cyanoacetic acid (6 eq. for compound 1; 16 eq. for compound 2) were loaded into a Schlenk flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar. The flask was evacuated and flushed with argon for three cycles. Next, a mixture of MeCN/CHCl3 (3:1) was added, and the mixture was again evacuated and flushed with argon. Then, piperidine (12 eq. for compound 1; 22 eq. for compound 2) was added, and finally, the flask was flushed with argon and evacuated. The mixture was heated at 90 °C for 24 h. After being cooled to room temperature, the mixture was evaporated under reduced pressure, water was added, and the crude product was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic layer was collected and dried over anhydrous MgSO4. After filtration, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by crystallization from a mixture of EtOH/Et2O.
10-Hydroxybenzo[h]quinoline-9-cyanoacrylic acid (1a) Yield: 54%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 9.04 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 8.66 (m, 1H), 8.61 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.19 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.10–8.03 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.99–7.92 (m, 1H), 7.83 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.20, 162.17, 146.40, 142.74, 138.59, 134.00, 128.97, 128.16, 126.29, 125.44, 122.28, 120.56, 119.88, 118.66, 117.85, 114.99, 114.88, 111.13. Elem. Anal. (%) Calcd for C17H10N2O3: C, 70.34; H, 3.47; N, 9.65. Found: C, 70.18; H, 3.77; N, 9.84.
10-Hydroxybenzo[h]quinoline-7,9-di(cyanoacrylic) acid (2a): Yield: 60%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 9.12 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 8.91 (s, 1H), 8.76 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.60 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 2H), 8.17 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.94–7.91 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.01, 164.63, 162.14, 146.86, 146.68, 142.74, 138.56, 134.80, 128.97, 128.18, 126.29, 124.22, 123.17, 120.52, 119.17, 118.65, 117.49, 114.99, 114.94, 114.86, 111.42. Elem. Anal. (%) Calcd for C21H11N3O3: C, 65.46; H, 2.877; N, 10.905. Found: C, 65.06; H, 2.93; N, 10.41.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis, Thermal, Optical and Electrochemical Characterization

The preparation route and chemical structure of novel compounds 10-hydroxybenzo[h]quinoline-9-cyanoacrylic acid and 10-hydroxybenzo[h]quinoline-7,9-di(cyanoacrylic) acid, denoted as 1a and 2a, respectively, are presented in Figure 1. The synthesis of the cyanoacrylic acids 10-hydroxobenzo[h]quinoline derivatives (1a and 2a) was carried out by the Knoevenagel condensation reaction of 1 and 2 in the presence of cyanoacetic acid and piperidine. The aldehyde precursors 1 and 2 were prepared according to the previously described procedure [42].
The desired dyes 1a and 2a were obtained in good yield (54–60%) as an orange (1a) and red solid (2a). The 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic characterization and elemental analysis confirmed its chemical structure and purity. DSC thermograms registered in the first heating scan showed the melting endotherms with a maximum at 240 and 175 °C, for 1a and 2a, respectively (cf. Figure S1). The second heating run, recorded after cooling, revealed only the glass transition (Tg) temperature at 202 (1a) and 119 °C (2a), and during further heating, no additional peaks were seen. It shows that the prepared compounds are molecular glasses, which form a stable glassy phase. The presence of a second cyanoacrylic acid group lowered the melting point, but conversely, slightly impacted Tg.
The electronic absorption and photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the cyanoacrylic acids 10-hydroxobenzo[h] quinoline derivatives in methanol (MeOH) and dimethylformamide (DMF) are shown in Figure 2, and the data are listed in Table 1. Additionally, the UV-vis data of starting aldehydes (1 and 2) are given in Figure S2 and Table S1.
The synthesized compounds (1a and 2a) reveal two absorption bands, with one of them assigned to the π-π* electronic excitations localized within the conjugated system, ranging from 260 to 360 nm, and with a maximum of 278 (1a), 280 (2a) nm and shoulder of 328 (1a), 354 nm (2a), respectively. The second is seen at a lower energy range with λmax at 391 (1a) and 407 (2a), which can be attributed to the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) from 10-hydroxybenzo[h]quinoline to the electron withdrawing anchoring fragment. The λmax of ICT of 2a is bathochromically shifted (16 nm), and the band is broader and in a visible range compared to 1a. Usually, the increase in cyanoacrylic acid groups shifts the absorption range to a lower energy [23,25]. In this case, the effect of the number of cyanoacrylic acid units on the electronic absorption range is weakly pronounced. A good match between the experimental and obtained from DFT calculations absorption spectra was observed (cf. Figure 3). Compound 2a, with two anchoring groups, exhibits a higher molar absorption coefficient (ε = 10,667 at 354 nm and 10,000 M−1cm−1 at 407 nm) than compound 1a with one cyanoacrylic acid moiety (ε = 6000 at 328 nm and 6667 M−1cm−1 at 391 nm) in DMF. Thus, a higher molar absorption coefficient and red-shifted spectrum of 2a can be advantageous for a higher DSSC efficiency.
When comparing the UV-vis spectra of 1a and 2a with the absorption of aldehydes, it was found that the replacement of CHO units in 1 and 2 by the cyanoacrylic acid group in 1a and 2a results in a bathochromic shift of 10 nm in the ICT peak in the case of 1a, while for 2a, the position of ICT remains unchanged (Table 1 and Table S1). The absorption shapes of 1 and 1a are similar, whereas in the case of 2a, the S0→S2 transition is weakly expressed when compared to compound 2. Conversely, compounds 1a (εmax = 5085 M−1cm−1) and 2a (εmax = 12,727 M−1cm−1) have a considerably higher molar extinction coefficient for the S0→S1 transition compared to both aldehyde derivatives 1 (εmax = 4505 M−1cm−1) and 2 (εmax = 208 M−1cm−1) in methanol solution.
Next, the absorption nature of synthesized compounds adsorbed into TiO2 was tested. Figure 2a displays the UV-vis spectra of a 1a and 2a measured for TiO2 films with adsorbed dyes. In the UV-vis spectra of 1a and TiO2 system (1a@TiO2) one band with a maximum at 406 nm was observed. In the case of 2a@TiO2 band, two structured maxima at 350 and 395 nm is seen. When the solution state and TiO2 systems spectra were compared, both adsorbed molecules shown shifted absorption, which is likely due to aggregation [49,50]. Moreover, TiO2 with dyes exhibited an extended absorption curve up to 600 nm, which was about 150 nm higher than the solution state absorption curve, probably due to the J-aggregates’ formation [49,50]. Considering the UV-vis spectra of TiO2 with dyes, the broader absorption covering the range from 300 to 600 nm exhibited 2a@TiO2 compare to 1a@TiO2 which absorbed radiation from 340 to 600 nm (cf. Figure 2). The effect of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) as co-adsorbent on UV-vis properties of the prepared photoanodes was also studied. Some of the most commonly used co-adsorbents for DSSC are cholic acid (CA), deoxycholic acid (DCA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA). In this article, CDCA was selected based on our previous results [51], and the DFT calculations described herein in Section 3.2.1. The expected decrease in absorbance of the photoanode containing CDCA was seen (cf. Figure 2b). The working principle of the co-adsorbent is based on the adsorption of CDCA particles instead of dye molecules, which reduces the formation of dyes aggregates. Due to the smaller number of dye molecules anchored to the TiO2 surface, the absorbance decreases.
In PL spectra of 1a and 2a, two emission maxima in the range of 400–675 nm are seen. Similar to absorption spectra, a hypsochromic shift in emission spectra was observed for bi anchoring 2a compared to mono anchoring 1a. Compounds 1a and 2a demonstrate very weak fluorescence in both solutions with the PL quantum yields range from 0.07 to 1.25% higher for bi anchoring dye 2a (Table 1). A comparable increase in quantum efficiency was observed for the pyrazolo[3,4-b]quinoline and phenothiazine derivatives when increasing the number and/or strength of electron withdrawing substituents [52,53]. Compounds 1a and 2a possess bixponential fluorescence decay in both solvents (Table 1 and Figure S4). The efficient lifetimes of 1a and 2a are comparable in the same solvent and slightly shorter in DMF (4.24–4.57 ns) than in MeOH (5.56–5.97 ns). The time-resolved data and emission range imply that for dyes 1a and 2a, the ICT character is lessened, and the fluorescence may originate from π→π* excited state because ICT is a competitive relaxation process of the singlet excited state and typically reduces the fluorescence [54].
The cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were carried out to study the electrochemical behavior of the synthesized benzo[h]quinolin-10-ol derivatives and N719 in Bu4NPF6/DMF solution. During the CV experiment, the reduction process was not observed, and oxidation processes for 2a and N719 were seen (Figure S4). The oxidation potential onset (Eoxonset) of 2a was higher (0.53 V) compared to N719 (0.33 V). A slightly higher oxidation potential (0.35 V) of N719 was determined from DPV measurements (Figure S5). Comparing the structure of 2a and 1a, it is expected that the oxidation potential of 2a (with two electron withdrawing groups) should be lower than 1a [54]. It can be assumed that the oxidation potential of 1a is higher than 0.53 V (2a). Unfortunately, it is impossible to measure the higher potential in DMF. Changing the solvent was not considered, due to the limited solubility of these compounds. Based on the oxidation onset, the potential HOMO energy level was calculated assuming that the IP of ferrocene equals −5.1 eV [55], being −5.73 and −5.63 eV for 2a and N719, respectively. HOMO levels are somewhat more negative than the I−/I3− redox potential (−4.8 eV) [32], and should enable the dye regeneration. The LUMO energy level determined from the optical energy gap (EgOPT), and calculated HOMO to be −3.03 and −3.47 eV for 2a and N719, respectively. A HOMO energy level of N719 was reported in the literature from UPS (−5.34 eV vs vacuum) and CV in DMF (−5.37 eV vs vacuum); these measurements are similar to our experimental result [56,57]. However, the lower HOMO energy level in the range of 6.0–6.14 eV obtained in different CV experimental conditions was also reported [58,59,60]. Additionally, CV measurements of N179 were carried out in acetonitrile (ACN) and DMF with various scanning rates. In both cases, an irreversible oxidation process was demonstrated (Figure S6, Table S2). At different scan rates, the beginning of the peak did not change.

3.2. Computational Studies

Density functional theory (DFT) studies were applied for (i) explanation of the co-adsorbents chemical structure importance, (ii) both neat compounds and dye-TiO2 system geometry optimizations and frontier molecular orbitals energy determination of 1a and 2a, and (iii) UV-vis absorption spectra calculations of dyes in solution and dye-TiO2 systems.

3.2.1. Importance of Co-Adsorbents Chemical Structure

The co-adsorbents are applied for DSSC photoanode preparation to limit the dye aggregates formation onto TiO2 surface which may improve the photovoltaic performance of the device. As co-adsorbents, chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), cholic acid (CA) and deoxycholic acid (DCA) are usually used [61]. Among them, the beneficial impact of CDCA on DSSC efficiency was presented in our previous work [51]. Moreover, based on DFT, G. Saranya et al. [62] showed that CDCA co-adsorbent is a crucial component of a high-performance DSSC; they studied effect of CDCA on the properties of the dye denoted as TY6′ and TiO2 interface. It was found that CDCA not only stabilizes the TY6′/TiO2 system, but also prevents the surface tensile stress induced by the dye monolayer [62].
Considering the chemical structure of CDCA, CA, and DCA, they differ structurally only by their R substituents. There is a lack of an explanation of the effect of the chemical structure of CA, DCA, and CDCA on DSSC performance in the literature. Thus, to explain the impact of co-adsorbents CDCA, CA and DCA chemical structure, DFT was used. The geometric optimizations and frequency calculations were made with the use of functional B3LYP [44,45] with the smaller 6-31G(d) basis set [46]. The calculations were carried out with the Gaussian 16, Revision C.01 program [43]. The molecular geometry, HOMO and LUMO contours of the Ti21O54H24 cluster, CA, CDCA, DCA co-adsorbent, as well as the adsorbed enol–forms of the compounds on Ti21O54H24 cluster are given in Table S3.
A TiO2 surface model was built by cutting two trilayers from the bulk experimental geometry (with Ti–O bond lengths of 1.948 Å and 1.981 Å) and closed by hydrogen atoms (with optimized positions) forming terminal hydroxyl groups, which led to a Ti21O54H24 cluster (Figure 3).
A two-trilayer thickness was used to allow fivefold coordinated Ti atoms on the surface. Toward the other two directions, the model’s size was chosen to have a central fivefold coordinated Ti atom on the surface with two neighbouring fivefold coordinated Ti atoms and two neighbouring bridging oxygen atoms.
Two types, monodentate through C=O and bidentate bridging, namely the enol– and keto– forms, of anchoring modes of the dyes were calculated. The Ti–Ocarboxylate bond distances in enol–form (cf. Table S4) of 2.23 Å (CA), and 2.18 Å (CDCA, DCA) are longer than in the case of keto—bidentate form, where the distances are 2.11, 2.14 Å in CA, 2.09, 2.14 in CDCA and 2.09 and 2.18 Å in DCA. Thus, the bidentate bridging mode creates a more stable system. This is especially evident in the case of CA dye, for which the calculated adsorption energy of keto–form is 12 kcal/mol higher compared to the enol– one. The adsorption energies, calculated using the expression Eads = Edye + ETiO2 − Edye@TiO2, where Edye, ETiO2 and Edye@TiO2 are the energies of dye, Ti21O54H24, and total system (dye@ Ti21O54H24) of the enol– forms of these dyes are similar to the differences, do not exceed 2.4 kcal/mol (cf. Figure 4 and Table S4).
The keto–form of CA shows a higher adsorption energy by about 9 kcal/mol than CDCA and DCA dyes. Moreover, one of the hydroxyl groups of CA molecule forms a hydrogen bond with TiO2, which results in the slope of the carbon skeleton and prevents interaction of sensitizer and TiO2 surface (Figure 5).
The adsorbed CDCA molecule is almost perpendicular to the TiO2 surface. The slope of the carbon skeleton increases with CDA and reaches a significant value for CA (cf. Figure S7). Thus, the high adsorption energy, highest Gads and the bent geometry of the carbon skeleton of the adsorbed CA molecule indicate the smallest suitability for use in cells among the dyes tested. The adsorption energies of CDCA and DCA molecules are similar, however, taking into account the almost perpendicular adsorption of the CDCA molecule and the slightly higher value of Gads, it can be assumed that CDCA is a better co-adsorbent than DCA.

3.2.2. Dye and Dye-TiO2 System Geometry Optimizations and Frontier Molecular Orbitals Energy Determination

The geometry optimizations and frequency calculations were made with of the use the B3LYP functional [44,45] with the 6-31G(d,p) basis set [63,64]. The calculations were carried out with the Gaussian 16, Revision C.01 program [43]. Adsorbed 1a and 2a molecules on the clusters are presented in Figure 6.
To obtain the binding energies of the dyes on TiO2, the structures of 1a, 2a and Ti21O54H24 cluster were optimized separately (cf. Section 3.2.1), before the dye@Ti21O54H24 systems were optimized. During the optimization of the dye@Ti21O54H24 system, the carboxylic proton of the dye was transferred to a nearby oxygen atom of the TiO2. Hence, the dyes were adsorbed on TiO2 with a bidentate bridging mode. Due to the intimate contact between carboxylate anchor-based dyes and the metal oxide surface, the structures with bidentate bridging modes exhibit superior stability compared to other types of anchoring modes. Because of the presence of two carboxyl groups in the 2a molecule, the geometries of two possible types (2a-a and 2a-b) of adsorption of this compound on the TiO2 surface have been optimized. Adsorption energies calculated using the expression Eads = Edye@TiO2 – (Edye + ETiO2), where Edye, ETiO2 and Edye@TiO2 are the energies of dye, Ti21O54H24, and total system (dye@Ti21O54H24). The obtained binding energies were –42.11, –37.37 and –52,72 kcal/mol for 2a-a, 2a-b and 1a, respectively. The Ti–Ocarboxylate bond distances are of 2.16, 2.18 Ǻ in 2a-a@Ti21O54H24, 2.14, 2.21 Ǻ in 2a-b@Ti21O54H24 and in the case of 1a@Ti21O54H24 the distances are 2.11 and 2.18 Ǻ. The higher adsorption energy, and especially the high value of ΔGads, indicates that the interaction of 2a with TiO2 takes place through the carboxylate group in position 7 of the benzoquinoline ring i.e., in the form presented in Figure 6 as Ti21O54H24⋯2a-a. Adsorption through the carbonyl group in the trans position to the hydroxyl group in the benzoquinoline ring is also strengthened by the direction of the molecule’s dipole moment, as shown in Figure S8 in the Supplementary Materials.
In the case of both dyes, there is a possibility of the formation of hydrogen bonds between the dye molecule and the TiO2 surface (cf. Figure S9). Whereas in the 2a-a@Ti21O54H24 system, a cyano group and a proton belonging to the hydrated TiO2 surface are involved in such a bond, of 2a-b@Ti21O54H24 the hydroxyl group on the surface interacts with the nitrogen atom in the benzoquinoline ring. Two types of hydrogen bonds are possible in the 1a@Ti21O54H24 system. One between the –C≡N group and hydrated titanium oxide, and the second between the hydroxyl group at position 10 of the benzoquinoline ring and the oxygen of TiO2.
The geometry of the adsorbed molecules in the range of angles between the plane of the benzoquinoline ring and the carboxylate anchor group is significantly different from that of free dye molecules (cf. Figures S10 and S11, and Table S5). In adsorbed dye molecules, the plane of aromatic rings is twisted in relation to the plane of the 2-cyanoacrylic unit, and additionally in the 2a-b@Ti21O54H24 and 1a@Ti21O54H24 the benzoquinoline rings, which are tilted over the TiO2 surface. The relatively smallest changes occur in the thermodynamically and energetically privileged 2a-a@Ti21O54H24 system, for which the angle between the benzoquinoline plane and the titanium dioxide surface does not differ much from the right angle (85.17°). Moreover, the internal geometry of the 2a molecule adsorbed by carboxylate anchor in position 7 of benzoquinoline changes slightly, while the plane of the aromatic rings is twisted in relation to the plane of the carboxylate group only by about 5°.
The frontier molecular orbitals (FMO) of the dyes adsorbed on Ti21O54H24 system (c.f. Figure S12) reveal that HOMOs are localized in the dye while LUMOs have the shape of the lobes characteristic of d-type orbitals of titanium atoms. The analysis of the density of states diagrams (cf. Figure S13) shows that in 2a@Ti21O54H24, the dye orbitals have a certain share (14%) of the HOMO level. In the case of the 1a@Ti21O54H24 system, HOMO is located entirely on the dye (99%). Thus, the contribution of the dye is more significant in the valence band. LUMO in both systems is located on the Ti21O54H24.
The UV-vis spectra of the 2a@Ti21O54H24 and 1a@Ti21O54H24 were simulated in a vacuum using TF-DFT formalism depicted in Figure 7.
The transitions calculated in the visible range of the electronic absorption spectrum correspond to the excitations between the HOMO and the lowest energetically LUMO levels. Considering the location of the HOMO and LUMO orbitals (cf. Table S6), it can be concluded that in the case of 1a, the process of charge transfer from the dye molecule to TiO2 is more pronounced. This is due to the fact that the HOMO orbital in the 1a@Ti21O54H24 system is located on the dye molecule, while in 2a@Ti21O54H24 the proportion of the dye in HOMO is 14%. Thus, considering the calculation results concern FMO appear that 1a could be a better sensitizer than 2a, however, a wider range of absorption, the thermodynamics of adsorption as well as changes in the geometry of the adsorbed dyes indicate 2a-a as a better sensitizer.

3.3. DSSCs Characterization

The synthesized cyanoacrylic acids 10-hydroxobenzo[h]quinoline derivatives (1a and 2a) were applied as sensitizers and co-sensitizers in DSSCs. Photovoltaic devices with a FTO/TiO2 + dye/EL-HSE/Pt/FTO structure were fabricated. The three types of PV cells were prepared: (i) with a neat 1a and 2a, (ii) with a mixture of a new dye with the N719 and (iii) with a mixture of dyes and co-adsorbent. As co-adsorbent, based on our previous studies (described in [51]), and the DFT results presented in Section 3.2.1, chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) was selected. Moreover, the reference cell with N719 was constructed.

3.3.1. Photoanode Thickness and Morphology

In the first step of the investigation, prepared photoanodes’ thickness and surface morphology were investigated using optical, scanning electron (SEM) and atomic force microscopes (AFM). The TiO2 layer thickness significantly impacts the photovoltaic parameters of the solar cells. The thicker layers can adsorb more dye molecules, but too much absorbed molecules may cause higher electron transport resistance and increase the recombination of electron with I3− on the TiO2 surface, which decrease the open-circuit voltage (Voc) of the device and, consequently, lower the power conversion efficiency (PCE). Additionally, too thick an oxide layer may limit electron generation. Conversely, in thin TiO2 layers, not enough dye number can be anchored, causing a decrease in short-circuit current (Jsc) values, which is reflected in PCE reduction [51,65,66]. The obtained TiO2 layers with adsorbed dyes molecules thickness, root-mean-square (RMS) determined based on AFM and root-mean-square roughness (Sq) and sharpness of the roughness profile (Sku) obtained from optical microscope measurements are collected in Table 2.
The tested substrates with anchored dyes molecules showed thicknesses ranging from 8 to 12 µm. In the presented work, the thickness of the TiO2 was measured using two methods, optical and SEM microscopes. The advantage of the SEM over the optical microscope is that the thickness of individual layers can be determined. However, that thickness determination using an optical microscope is a non-destructive method. The representative cross-sectional SEM image and micrograph of photoanodes are depicted in Figure 8 and Figure S14. On the SEM images the layer of glass, FTO and mesoporous TiO2 were seen (cf. Figure 8 and Figure S14). Moreover, based on SEM, the presence of spherical TiO2 nanoparticles was confirmed. Considering the data given in Table 2, it can be concluded that only small differences in the obtained thickness values of TiO2 were observed using two independent measuring methods (SEM and optical microscope).
The values of surface quality parameters (RMS) determined by AFM were similar for most of the photoanodes tested. An increase in the roughness of the electrodes was observed when co-adsorbent was used. By analyzing the parameters Sq and Sku, it was possible to observe the trend of their change depending on the new dye used. In each of the three types of electrode structures, the mentioned parameters had lower values for compound 1a. Moreover, similarly to the RMS values, the parameters described (Sq and Sku) increased after the addition of CDCA, which was due to lead to fewer dye molecules being anchored to the oxide substrate and thus less smoothing.

3.3.2. Photovoltaic Properties of Devices

The photovoltaic (PV) properties of fabricated cells under standard AM 1.5 irradiations (100 mWcm−2) were analyzed using current-voltage (J–V) characteristics and the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Based on J–V plots, open-circuit voltage (Voc), photocurrent density (Jsc), fill factor (FF), and power conversion efficiency (PCE) were calculated as the PV parameters (cf. Table 3). Photocurrent density−voltage curves (J−V) of fabricated devices are presented in Figure 9.
As can be expected considering the UV-vis absorption range of synthesized 1a and 2a, the devices based on neat cyanoacrylic acids 10-hydroxobenzo[h]quinoline derivatives exhibited significantly lower PV performance compare to a reference cell based on N719. This is mainly due to low Jsc values, which are largely related to the absorption properties of the dyes. This was due to the relatively narrow range and lower absorbance of the studied compounds compare to N719 (cf. Figure S16). The utilization of the synthesized compounds as co-sensitizers allowed the increase of the PCE up to 6.02 and 6.38% (1a + N719 and 2a + N719, respectively) compared to reference cell based on a neat N719 (PCE = 5.35%). The higher efficiency of the dye-mixed devices is mainly attributed to improvement in Jsc. The increase in Jsc was due to the extension of the absorption range of the photoanode containing a mixture of dyes, that is, N719 and cyanoacrylic acid 10-hydroxobenzo[h]quinoline derivatives compare to the absorption of the neat compounds (cf. Figure S16). The utilization of CDCA as co-adsorbent for photoanode preparation results in a further increase of PCE due to raising Voc, Jsc and FF. In the case of CDCA addition, only the cell containing molecules 2a and N719 showed a higher efficiency (7.22%) than the reference cell (6.90%). The cell prepared with dye 1a and N719 had lower photovoltaic parameters, including efficiency (6.42%). In each case, devices containing the dye 2a showed better efficiency than a solar cell with compound 1a due to mainly higher reached short-circuit current density. Photoanodes containing anchored molecules of dye 1a and N719, both with and without the addition of CDCA, had higher absorption compared to photoanodes based on 2a and N719.
According to the DFT calculations concerning FMO energy levels, a device with 1a showed better performance than 2a. However, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy studies have shown differences in the layer-by-layer resistances of these two types of solar cells favoring cells containing compound 2a.
To study the intrinsic charge transfer properties of the cells, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) technique was used. Impedance spectroscopy method involves analysis of investigated system response under AC conditions in a range of frequencies. Each cell under light exposure of simulated solar light source of 1000 Lm/m2 was exposed to AC voltage signal. The DC voltage signal applied by a potentiostat was maintained at 0 V to reach short-circuit conditions. As each cell has its particular open-circuit voltage value, any particular non-zero voltage applied to different cells would result in electrodes’ different polarization. Therefore, the short-circuit conditions were chosen to measure impedance spectra as they allow us to compare the cells operating at the maximum current regime. The set of obtained impedance spectra are shown in Figure 10. Figure 10 gives a comparison between impedance spectra recorded in dark and under light illumination.
The complex plane plots (Figure 10) have a semicircle, with minor deviations in the low-frequency region. The axis scales of the graph are deliberately made equal size to check the ideality of the semicircle, which is frequently observed and usually expected in the case of electrochemical systems.
The equivalent electrical circuit that fitted all the experimental spectra is shown in the inset of Figure 10. It describes the charge transport through the current-limiting electrode-solution interface. The cell includes two electrodes, and one could expect the appearance of two capacitance-resistance blocks in the model. However, in the case of a relatively high current, the limiting effect of one photoanode becomes crucial, thus the impedance of the counter electrode seems to be negligibly small to have an impact on total system impedance. Therefore, the effect of only a photosensitive semiconductor-solution interface could be revealed from impedance spectrum analysis.
Elements R1 and C1 correspond to a charge transport process that was limiting the DSSC operation within the low voltage range, with resistance R1 being a charge transfer resistance of the cell. The physical sense of C1 element is better described as a capacitance of the electrode-electrolyte interface. The calculated values of all four parameters for all five types of cells are shown in Table 4.
The resistance R1 is considered the main parameter responsible for charge transfer rate through the electrode-solution interface. The values of its inverse value (charge transfer conductance) are compared in Figure 11.
The increase of R−1 value under illumination proves the photosensitivity of the electrode. The highest charge transfer conductivity (the lowest resistance) under light illumination was observed for the cell containing 1a active component (Figure 11). The charge transfer conductivity of the 2a based cells was smaller than the 1a based cells (Figure 11), however, the relative increase of conductivity under illumination was still high, especially in the case of 2a + N719 + CDCA sensitizer. The values of charge transfer resistance do not have to correspond directly to the photoconversion efficiency of the dye, which is a complex characteristic affected by many factors. The R value is not a photochemical, but an electrochemical parameter that describes the rate of charge transfer through the electrode-solution interface and is regarded to have the highest impact on the total internal resistance of the cell.

4. Conclusions

Two new benzo[h]quinolin-10-ol derivatives with one or two cyanoacrylic acid units were synthesized and characterized as well as tested as (co)-sensitizers DSSCs. Moreover, the beneficial impact of CDCA as a co-adsorbent was explained based on DFT calculations.
Summarizing the findings concerning the effect of the chemical structure of the prepared compounds, it was found that the introduction of a second anchoring group to benzo[h]quinolin-10-ol derivatives (i) significantly lowered melting temperature by about 65 °C but only slightly affected Tg, as well as its produced steel which is high at about 120 °C, (ii) lowered oxidation potential, and based on DFT in s 2a@TiO2 system, the dye orbitals have a certain share (14%) in the HOMO level. This is contrary to 1a@TiO2, where HOMO is located entirely on the dye (99%), and (iii) increased the molar absorption coefficient, slightly bathochromically shifted λmax, and when adsorbed in TiO2 showed a higher absorption range compared to 1a@TiO2.
The DFT calculations of the utilization effect of three co-adsorbents, CDCA, CA and CDA, revealed that due to the almost perpendicular adsorption of the CDCA molecule and a higher value of Gads, CDCA seems to be a better co-adsorbent than others.
Considering the PV efficiency of fabricated solar cells based on synthesized molecules as co-sensitizers with N719, we improved the PCE value of about 12% (1a) and 19% (2a) with respect to the reference device based on a neat N719. The addition of CDCA increased the PCE of a reference cell from 5.35 to 6.90%. While the device with photoanode consists of a mixture of 2a, N719 and CDCA showed a further increase of efficiency to 7.22%. Thus, the utilization of benzo[h]quinolin-10-ol derivative with two 2-cyanoacrylic acid units reduces the applied amount of N719 and enhances the DSSC performance.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma14123386/s1, The Supplementary Materials file included used materials, measurements, DSSC preparation description, DSC thermograms (Figure S1), absorption spectra and data (Figure S2, S3, and S16, and Table S1), fluorescence decays of tested dyes (Figure S4), electrochemical data (Figure S5, S6, and Table S2), DFT data of TiO2 clusters, dyes (Tables S3–S6, Figures S7–S13), The cross-sectional SEM images of prepared TiO2 (Figure S14) and optical microscope micrographs of electrodes (Figure S15).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S.-B.; investigation, A.S., G.S.-G., J.G.M., P.G., P.C., M.V., J.N., M.L., E.S.-B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S., G.S.-G., J.G.M., P.G., P.C., M.V., E.S.-B.; writing—review and editing, A.S., J.G.M., J.N., E.S.-B. All authors have read the manuscript and agreed to the published.

Funding

This work was supported by National Science Centre of Poland Grant: No. 2016/23/B/ST8/02045.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The GAUSSIAN-09 calculations were carried out in the Wrocław Centre for Networking and Supercomputing, WCSS, Wrocław, Poland, http://www.wcss.wroc.pl (accessed on 15 June 2021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Grätzel, M. Recent advances in sensitized mesoscopic solar cells. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1788–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shakeel Ahmad, M.; Pandey, A.K.; Abd Rahim, N. Advancements in the development of TiO2 photoanodes and its fabrication methods for dye sensitized solar cell (DSSC) applications. A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 77, 89–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Breyer, C.; Bogdanov, D.; Aghahosseini, A.; Gulagi, A.; Child, M.; Oyewo, A.S.; Farfan, J.; Sadovskaia, K.; Vainikka, P. Solar photovoltaics demand for the global energy transition in the power sector. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2018, 26, 505–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Naik, P.; Elmorsy, M.R.; Su, R.; Babu, D.D.; El-Shafei, A.; Adhikari, A.V. New carbazole based metal-free organic dyes with D-π-A-π-A architecture for DSSCs: Synthesis, theoretical and cell performance studies. Sol. Energy 2017, 153, 600–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. O’Regan, B.; Grätzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 1991, 354, 737–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lee, C.P.; Li, C.T.; Ho, K.C. Use of organic materials in dye-sensitized solar cells. Mater. Today 2017, 20, 267–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, Z.S.; Song, X.C.; Liu, Y.D.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.S.; Chen, Z.J.; Liu, S.; Weng, Q.; An, Z.W.; Guo, W.J. New organic dyes with varied arylamine donors as effective co-sensitizers for ruthenium complex N719 in dye sensitized solar cells. J. Power Sources 2020, 451, 227776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hagfeldt, A.; Boschloo, G.; Sun, L.; Kloo, L.; Pettersson, H. Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6595–6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Johnson, N.M.; Smolin, Y.Y.; Hagaman, D.; Soroush, M.; Lau KK, S.; Ji, H.F. Suitability of N-propanoic acid spiropyrans and spirooxazines for use as sensitizing dyes in dye-sensitized solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 2981–2989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sivanadanam, J.; Mukkamala, R.; Mandal, S.; Vedarajan, R.; Matsumi, N.; Aidhen, I.S.; Ramanujam, K. Exploring the role of the spacers and acceptors on the triphenylamine-based dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 4691–4705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ashraf, S.; Yildirim, E.; Akhtar, J.; Siddiqi, H.M.; El-Shafei, A. A comparative study of the influence of N,N’-dialkyl vs. N,N’-diaryl-based electron donor ancillary ligands on photocurrent and photovoltage in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 20847–20860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Desta, M.B.; Vinh, N.S.; Pavan Kumar, C.; Chaurasia, S.; Wu, W.T.; Lin, J.T.; Wei, T.C.; Diau, E. Pyrazine-incorporating panchromatic sensitizers for dye sensitized solar cells under one sun and dim light. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 13778–13789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Elmorsy, M.R.; Abdel-Latif, E.; Badawy, S.A.; Fadda, A.A. Molecular geometry, synthesis and photovoltaic performance studies over 2-cyanoacetanilides as sensitizers and effective co-sensitizers for DSSCs loaded with HD-J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2020, 389, 112239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, G.; Wu, Y.; Ding, W.; Yu, G.; Hu, Z.; Wang, H.; Liu, S.; Zou, Y.; Pan, C. Photovoltaic performance of long-chain poly(triphenylamine-phenothiazine) dyes with a tunable π-bridge for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 14217–14227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Su, R.; Elmorsy, M.R.; Abed, M.; Islam, A.; Lord, M.; Fadda, A.A.; El-Shafei, A. A Comparative Study on Two RuII Complexes with Thiophene-Based Ancillary Ligands for High-Efficiency Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 2017, 3690–3697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Unny, D.; Kandregula, G.R.; Sivanadanam, J.; Ramanujam, K. Molecular engineering of pyrene carbazole dyes with a single bond and double bond as the mode of linkage. N. J. Chem. 2020, 44, 16511–16525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Carella, A.; Borbone, F.; Centore, R. Research progress on photosensitizers for DSSC. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Smestad, G.P. Education and solar conversion: Demonstrating electron transfer. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1998, 55, 157–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ye, M.; Wen, X.; Wang, M.; Iocozzia, J.; Zhang, N.; Lin, C.; Lin, Z. Recent advances in dye-sensitized solar cells: From photoanodes, sensitizers and electrolytes to counter electrodes. Mater. Today 2015, 18, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cha, S.I.; Kim, Y.; Hwang, K.H.; Shin, Y.J.; Seo, S.H.; Lee, D.Y. Dye-sensitized solar cells on glass paper: TCO-free highly bendable dye-sensitized solar cells inspired by the traditional Korean door structure. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6071–6075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, L.; Cole, J.M. Anchoring groups for dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 3427–3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Błaszczyk, A. Strategies to improve the performance of metal-free dye-sensitized solar cells. Dye Pigm. 2018, 149, 707–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kula, S.; Szlapa-Kula, A.; Fabiańczyk, A.; Gnida, P.; Libera, M.; Bujak, K.; Siwy, M.; Schab-Balcerzak, E. Effect of thienyl units in cyanoacrylic acid derivatives toward dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019, 197, 111555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, X.; Bolag, A.; Yun, W.; Du, Y.; Eerdun, C.; Zhang, X.; Bao, T.; Ning, J.; Alata, H.; Ojiyed, T. Enhanced performance of dye-sensitized solar cells based on a dual anchored diphenylpyranylidene dye and N719 co-sensitization. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1206, 127694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fabiańczyk, A.; Gnida, P.; Chulkin, P.; Kula, S.; Filapek, M.; Szlapa-Kula, A.; Janeczek, H.; Schab-Balcerzak, E. Effect of heterocycle donor in 2-cyanoacrylic acid conjugated derivatives for DSSC applications. Sol. Energy 2020, 220, 1109–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Luo, J.; Wan, Z.; Jia, C.; Wang, Y.; Wu, X.; Yao, X. Co-sensitization of Dithiafulvenyl-Phenothiazine Based Organic Dyes with N719 for Efficient Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 211, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kotowicz, S.; Sęk, D.; Kula, S.; Fabiańczyk, A.; Małecki, J.G.; Gnida, P.; Maćkowski, S.; Siwy, M.; Schab-Balcerzak, E. Photoelectrochemical and thermal characterization of aromatic hydrocarbons substituted with a dicyanovinyl unit. Dyes Pigm. 2020, 180, 108432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lee, K.M.; Hsu, Y.C.; Ikegami, M.; Miyasaka, T.; Justin Thomas, K.R.; Lin, J.T.; Ho, K.C. Co-sensitization promoted light harvesting for plastic dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 2416–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Singh, S.P.; Chandrasekharam, M.; Gupta, K.S.V.; Islam, A.; Han, L.; Sharma, G.D. Co-sensitization of amphiphilic ruthenium (II) sensitizer with a metal free organic dye: Improved photovoltaic performance of dye sensitized solar cells. Org. Electron. 2013, 14, 1237–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Su, R.; Lyu, L.; Elmorsy, M.R.; El-Shafei, A. Structural studies and photovoltaic investigation of indolo[2,3-b] quinoxaline-based sensitizers/co-sensitizers achieving highly efficient DSSCs. N. J. Chem. 2020, 44, 2797–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Keremane, K.; Abdellah, I.M.; Naik, P.; El-Shafei, A.; Adhikari, A.V. Simple thiophene-bridged D–π–A type chromophores for DSSCs: Comprehensive study of their sensitization and co-sensitization properties. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 23169–23184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Elmorsy, M.R.; Su, R.; Abdel-Latif, E.; Badawy, S.A.; El-Shafei, A.; Fadda, A.A. New cyanoacetanilides based dyes as effective co-sensitizers for DSSCs sensitized with ruthenium (II) complex (HD-2). J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 7981–7990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tanaka, E.; Michaels, H.; Freitag, M.; Robertson, N. Synergy of co-sensitizers in a copper bipyridyl redox system for efficient and cost-effective dye-sensitized solar cells in solar and ambient light. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 1279–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Elmorsy, M.R.; Lyu, L.; Su, R.; Abdel-Latif, E.; Badawy, S.A.; El-Shafei, A.; Fadda, A.A. Co-sensitization of the HD-2 complex with low-cost cyanoacetanilides for highly efficient DSSCs. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2020, 19, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cole, J.M.; Pepe, G.; Al Bahri, O.K.; Cooper, C.B. Cosensitization in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 7279–7327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lee, H.; Kim, J.; Kim, D.Y.; Seo, Y. Co-sensitization of metal free organic dyes in flexible dye sensitized solar cells. Org. Electron. 2018, 52, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Islam, A.; Akhtaruzzaman, M.; Chowdhury, T.H.; Qin, C.; Han, L.; Bedja, I.M.; Stalder, R.; Schanze, K.S.; Reynolds, J.R. Enhanced Photovoltaic Performances of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells by Co-Sensitization of Benzothiadiazole and Squaraine-Based Dyes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 4616–4623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hao, Y.; Saygili, Y.; Cong, J.; Eriksson, A.; Yang, W.; Zhang, J.; Polanski, E.; Nonomura, K.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grazel, M.; et al. Novel Blue Organic Dye for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Achieving High Efficiency in Cobalt-Based Electrolytes and by Co-Sensitization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 32797–32804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, Y.; Zeng, Z.; Li, C.; Wang, W.; Wang, X.; Zhang, B. Highly efficient co-sensitization of nanocrystalline TiO2 electrodes with plural organic dyes. N. J. Chem. 2005, 29, 773–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Clifford, J.N.; Forneli, A.; Chen, H.; Torres, T.; Tan, S.; Palomares, E. Co-sensitized DSCs: Dye selection criteria for optimized device Vocand efficiency. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 1693–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lin, L.Y.; Yeh, M.H.; Lee, C.P.; Chang, J.; Baheti, A.; Vittal, R.; Thomas, K.R.; Ho, K.C. Insights into the co-sensitizer adsorption kinetics for complementary organic dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Power. Sources 2014, 247, 906–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wantulok, J.; Szala, M.; Quinto, A.; Nycz, J.E.; Giannarelli, S.; Sokolova, R.; Książek, M.; Kusz, J. Synthesis and electrochemical and spectroscopic characterization of selected quinolinecarbaldehydes and Schiff bases as their derivatives. Molecules 2020, 25, 2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16, Revision C.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  44. Becke, A.D. Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic-behavior. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Perdew, J.P. Density-functional approximation for the correlation energy of the inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ditchfield, R.; Hehre, W.J.; Pople, J.A. Self-consistent molecular-orbital methods. IX. An extended gaussian-type basis for molecular-orbital studies of organic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 54, 724–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R.G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. O’Boyle, N.M.; Tenderholt, A.L.; Langner, K.M. Software News and Updates cclib: A Library for Package-Independent Computational Chemistry Algorithms. J. Comp. Chem. 2008, 29, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mas-Montoya, M.; Janssen, R.A.J. The Effect of H- and J-Aggregation on the Photophysical and Photovoltaic Properties of Small Thiophene–Pyridine–DPP Molecules for Bulk-Heterojunction Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1605779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Thogiti, S.; Vuppala, S.; Cha, H.L.; Thuong, N.T.; Jo, H.J.; Chitumalla, R.K.; Hee, S.C.; Thuy, C.T.; Jang, J.; Jung, J.H.; et al. Enhanced DSSC performance by the introduction of hydroxamic acid group into the cyanoacetic acid dyes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2020, 398, 112512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gnida, P.; Libera, M.; Pająk, A.; Schab-Balcerzak, E. Examination of the Effect of Selected Factors on the Photovoltaic Response of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 14344–14355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wan, W.; Wang, H.; Lin, H.; Wang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Jiang, H.; Zhu, S.; Wang, Z.; Hao, J. Synthesis, electrochemical, photophysical, and electroluminescent properties of organic dyes containing pyrazolo[3, 4-b]quinoline chromophore. Dyes Pigm. 2015, 121, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Slodek, A.; Zych, D.; Maroń, A.; Gawecki, R.; Mrozek-Wilczkiewicz, A.; Malarz, K.; Musiol, R. Phenothiazine derivatives—Synthesis, characterization, and theoretical studies with an emphasis on the solvatochromic properties. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 285, 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cidlina, A.; Novakova, V.; Miletin, M.; Zimcik, P. Peripheral substitution as a tool for tuning electron-accepting properties of phthalocyanine analogs in intramolecular charge transfer. Dalt. Trans. 2015, 44, 6961–6971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Slodek, A.; Zych, D.; Golba, S.; Zimosz, S.; Gnida, P.; Schab-Balcerzak, E. Dyes based on the D/A-acetylene linker-phenothiazine system for developing efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 5830–5840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, J.; Yu, C.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Ren, Y.; Shum, K. Energy barrier at the N719-dye/CsSnI3 interface for photogenerated holes in dye-sensitized solar cells. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. De Angelis, F.; Fantacci, S.; Mosconi, E.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Grätzel, M. Absorption spectra and excited state energy levels of the N719 dye on TiO2 in dye-sensitized solar cell models. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 8825–8831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Argazzi, R.; Bignozzi, C.A.; Heimer, T.A.; Castellano, F.N.; Meyer, G.J. Enhanced Spectral Sensitivity from Ruthenium(II) Polypyridyl Based Photovoltaic Devices. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 5741–5749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chung, I.; Lee, B.; He, J.; Chang RP, H.; Kanatzidis, M.G. All-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells with high efficiency. Nature 2012, 485, 486–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fattori, A.; Peter, L.M.; Belding, S.R.; Compton, R.G.; Marken, F. Cis-bis(isothiocyanato)-bis(2,2’-bipyridyl-4,4’dicarboxylato)-Ru(II) (N719) dark-reactivity when bound to fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) or titanium dioxide (TiO2) surfaces. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2010, 640, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hou, R.; Yuan, S.; Ren, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, M.; Li, D.; Shi, L. Effects of acetyl acetone-typed co-adsorbents on the interface charge recombination in dye-sensitized solar cell photoanodes. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 154, 190–196. [Google Scholar]
  62. Saranya, G.; Yam, C.; Gao, S.; Chen, M. Roles of Chenodeoxycholic Acid Coadsorbent in Anthracene-Based Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: A Density Functional Theory Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 23280–23287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. IV. A new dynamical correlation functional and implications for exact-exchange mixing. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 1040–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hsu, C.P.; Lee, K.M.; Huang JT, W.; Lin, C.Y.; Lee, C.H.; Wang, L.P.; Tsai, S.Y.; Ho, K.C. EIS analysis on low temperature fabrication of TiO2 porous films for dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 7514–7522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kao, M.C.; Chen, H.Z.; Young, S.L.; Kung, C.Y.; Lin, C.C. The effects of the thickness of TiO2 films on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517, 5096–5099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 14 03386 g001 550
Figure 1. Synthetic route for the preparation of benzo[h]quinolin-10-ol derivatives 1a and 2a.
Figure 1. Synthetic route for the preparation of benzo[h]quinolin-10-ol derivatives 1a and 2a.
Materials 14 03386 g001
Materials 14 03386 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) UV-vis spectra of 1a and 2a in solution and TiO2 films with adsorbed dyes on glass substrates, (b) 1a and 2a as co-sensitizers with N719 with or without CDCA addition and (c) photoluminescence spectra of 1a and 2a recorded in the MeOH and DMF solutions (c = 10–5 mol/L).
Figure 2. (a) UV-vis spectra of 1a and 2a in solution and TiO2 films with adsorbed dyes on glass substrates, (b) 1a and 2a as co-sensitizers with N719 with or without CDCA addition and (c) photoluminescence spectra of 1a and 2a recorded in the MeOH and DMF solutions (c = 10–5 mol/L).
Materials 14 03386 g002
Materials 14 03386 g003 550
Figure 3. The top, front and side view of the Ti21O54H24 cluster.
Figure 3. The top, front and side view of the Ti21O54H24 cluster.
Materials 14 03386 g003
Materials 14 03386 g004 550
Figure 4. Adsorbed keto- forms of the dyes on Ti21O54H24 cluster (The Gibbs free energies G of the Scheme 298.15 K).
Figure 4. Adsorbed keto- forms of the dyes on Ti21O54H24 cluster (The Gibbs free energies G of the Scheme 298.15 K).
Materials 14 03386 g004
Materials 14 03386 g005 550
Figure 5. Hydrogen bond in the Ti21O54H24⋯CA system.
Figure 5. Hydrogen bond in the Ti21O54H24⋯CA system.
Materials 14 03386 g005
Materials 14 03386 g006 550
Figure 6. Adsorption of 1a and 2a on Ti21O54H24 clusters (Gibbs free energies G of the species were calculated at 298.15 K).
Figure 6. Adsorption of 1a and 2a on Ti21O54H24 clusters (Gibbs free energies G of the species were calculated at 298.15 K).
Materials 14 03386 g006
Materials 14 03386 g007 550
Figure 7. Normalized calculated and experimental UV-vis spectra of (a) 1a or (b) 2a@Ti21O54H24 systems.
Figure 7. Normalized calculated and experimental UV-vis spectra of (a) 1a or (b) 2a@Ti21O54H24 systems.
Materials 14 03386 g007
Materials 14 03386 g008 550
Figure 8. The cross-sectional SEM image of prepared TiO2 substrate with anchored dyes mixture 2a + N719 + CDCA.
Figure 8. The cross-sectional SEM image of prepared TiO2 substrate with anchored dyes mixture 2a + N719 + CDCA.
Materials 14 03386 g008
Materials 14 03386 g009 550
Figure 9. Photocurrent-voltage curves of prepared dye-sensitized solar cells.
Figure 9. Photocurrent-voltage curves of prepared dye-sensitized solar cells.
Materials 14 03386 g009
Materials 14 03386 g010 550
Figure 10. Impedance spectra (complex plane plots) of the studied cells: in darkness (a,b) and under light illumination (c,d). The photoanode dye component is shown in the legend. The equivalent electrical circuit is shown in the inset of part b.
Figure 10. Impedance spectra (complex plane plots) of the studied cells: in darkness (a,b) and under light illumination (c,d). The photoanode dye component is shown in the legend. The equivalent electrical circuit is shown in the inset of part b.
Materials 14 03386 g010
Materials 14 03386 g011 550
Figure 11. Inverse values of the charge transfer resistance compared for a set of cells in dark and under illumination. The calculated numerical increase of conductivity is given in the inscription.
Figure 11. Inverse values of the charge transfer resistance compared for a set of cells in dark and under illumination. The calculated numerical increase of conductivity is given in the inscription.
Materials 14 03386 g011
Table
Table 1. Photophysical data for 1a and 2a recorded in MeOH and DMF solutions.
Table 1. Photophysical data for 1a and 2a recorded in MeOH and DMF solutions.
Solventλmax (nm) (ε (M−1cm−1))PL λem (nm)τeff (τ (ns) (Weight%))Φ (%)EgOPT (eV)
1a2a1a2a1a2a1a2a1a2a
MeOH275(10,880), 327(4635), 393(5085)273(23,896), 366(13,600),
383 (12,727)		418, 611413, 6015.56 [1.65 (21.24), 6.62(78.76)]5.97 [1.71(12.94), 6.60(87.06)]0.070.152.97, 2.033.00, 2.06
DMF276(16,000), 328(6000), 391(6667)289(10,000), 354(10,667), 407(10,000)430, 626411, 6104.24 [1.19(39.9), 6.26(60.1)]4.57 [1.17(45.04), 7.35(54.96)]1.131.252.893.02, 2.03
Table
Table 2. Characterization of the prepared photoanodes based on SEM, AFM and optical microscope measurements.
Table 2. Characterization of the prepared photoanodes based on SEM, AFM and optical microscope measurements.
PhotoanodeAFMSEMOptical Microscope
RMS (nm)Thickness (µm)Thickness (µm)Sq
(µm)		Sku
TiO2 + 1a32980.4594.159
TiO2 + 2a3310100.3194.707
TiO2 + 1a + N71929890.3834.331
TiO2 + 2a + N7193111100.3114.924
TiO2 + 1a + N719 + CDCA3512120.5985.479
TiO2 + 2a + N719 + CDCA3711120.6355.654
Table
Table 3. Photovoltaic parameters of fabricated dye-sensitized solar cells.
Table 3. Photovoltaic parameters of fabricated dye-sensitized solar cells.
Photoanode Sensitized withVoc (V)Jsc (mA cm−2)FF (–)PCE (%)
N7190.703 (±0.004)14.28 (±0.03)0.53 (±0.02)5.35 (±0.04)
N719 + CDCA0.762 (±0.003)17.20 (±0.05)0.50 (±0.01)6.90 (±0.07)
1a0.475 (±0.006)0.30 (±0.03)0.49 (±0.02)0.07 (±0.01)
2a0.567 (±0.002)1.38 (±0.02)0.57 (±0.01)0.44 (±0.02)
1a + N7190.680 (±0.002)16.12 (±0.01)0.51 (±0.01)6.02 (±0.03)
2a + N7190.670 (±0.002)17.57 (±0.03)0.53 (±0.01)6.38 (±0.04)
1a + N719 + CDCA0.700 (±0.003)16.94 (±0.08)0.53 (±0.01)6.42 (±0.08)
2a + N719 + CDCA0.716 (±0.001)17.44 (±0.04)0.57 (±0.01)7.22 (±0.04)
Table
Table 4. Calculated values of the equivalent circuit parameters.
Table 4. Calculated values of the equivalent circuit parameters.
DarkLight
CompoundRs/ΩR1/kΩC1/μFRs/ΩR1/kΩC1/μF
N719 + CDCA16.015.516.131.11.9621.5
1a + N71919.96.2818.016.71.6619.1
2a + N71918.86.0718.417.32.4220.4
1a + N719 + CDCA37.85.4519.122.31.7921.6
2a + N719 + CDCA21.62.2216.219.75.7218.6
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Slodek, A.; Gnida, P.; Małecki, J.G.; Szafraniec-Gorol, G.; Chulkin, P.; Vasylieva, M.; Nycz, J.; Libera, M.; Schab-Balcerzak, E. New Benzo[h]quinolin-10-ol Derivatives as Co-sensitizers for DSSCs. Materials 2021, 14, 3386. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123386

AMA Style

Slodek A, Gnida P, Małecki JG, Szafraniec-Gorol G, Chulkin P, Vasylieva M, Nycz J, Libera M, Schab-Balcerzak E. New Benzo[h]quinolin-10-ol Derivatives as Co-sensitizers for DSSCs. Materials. 2021; 14(12):3386. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123386

Chicago/Turabian Style

Slodek, Aneta, Paweł Gnida, Jan Grzegorz Małecki, Grażyna Szafraniec-Gorol, Pavel Chulkin, Marharyta Vasylieva, Jacek Nycz, Marcin Libera, and Ewa Schab-Balcerzak. 2021. "New Benzo[h]quinolin-10-ol Derivatives as Co-sensitizers for DSSCs" Materials 14, no. 12: 3386. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123386

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop