Next Article in Journal
Recatest—A Technique for Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Deferment and Degraded PVD Coatings and CVD Layers in the Deformed Area in the Scratch Test
Next Article in Special Issue
An Evaluation of the Properties of Urethane Dimethacrylate-Based Dental Resins
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Surfactant-Modified Montmorillonite on the Cross-Linking Efficiency of Polysiloxanes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study of Cytotoxic Properties of an Experimental Preparation with Features of a Dental Infiltrant
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Selected Spectroscopic Techniques for Surface Analysis of Dental Materials: A Narrative Review

by
Katarzyna Kaczmarek
1,*,
Andrzej Leniart
1,
Barbara Lapinska
2,
Slawomira Skrzypek
1 and
Monika Lukomska-Szymanska
2,*
1
Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Lodz, 12 Tamka St., 91-403 Lodz, Poland
2
Department of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 251 Pomorska St., 92-213 Lodz, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(10), 2624; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14102624
Submission received: 17 April 2021 / Revised: 9 May 2021 / Accepted: 11 May 2021 / Published: 17 May 2021

Abstract

:
The presented work focuses on the application of spectroscopic methods, such as Infrared Spectroscopy (IR), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR), Raman spectroscopy, Ultraviolet and Visible Spectroscopy (UV-Vis), X-ray spectroscopy, and Mass Spectrometry (MS), which are widely employed in the investigation of the surface properties of dental materials. Examples of the research of materials used as tooth fillings, surface preparation in dental prosthetics, cavity preparation methods and fractographic studies of dental implants are also presented. The cited studies show that the above techniques can be valuable tools as they are expanding the research capabilities of materials used in dentistry.

1. Introduction

For centuries in dentistry, the search remains for the best methods and materials to restore missing tooth structures or replace missing teeth [1,2,3]. Modern dentistry, in addition to its primary role to improve the health of masticatory system, increasingly focuses on the aesthetics of the preformed reconstructions [4,5,6,7]. The rapid development of this field is possible thanks to the constant introduction of new materials and research techniques [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Due to wide range of (ceramic, metallic, synthetic or composite) dental materials available on the market, it is crucial that dental technicians and/or dentists choose the appropriate method by taking into account its limitations and features [13,15,16,17,18,19,20].
The application of the material in the oral cavity, i.e., in direct contact with tissues, places special demands on this group of biomaterials regarding their physicochemical and biological properties, i.e., biocompatibility, local and general harmlessness to the organism [18,21,22], resistance to the effects of physicochemical factors in the oral cavity [21] and biophysical indifference [18,19]. In addition, the accuracy in mimicking natural tooth shapes [19], stability of mechanical properties [19,22], ease processing [21,23], appropriate aesthetics [19,24], and finally a moderate price [19,23] are further requirements that need to be met. The first phenomenon that occurs after the introduction of the biomaterial into the oral cavity is the formation of a biofilm on its surface [25,26,27]. In order to prevent the micro-leakage and the biofilm formation, it is important to know the material structural and chemical components [7,28,29]. Surface structure, roughness, chemical composition and reactivity are just a few of the main characteristics that should be assessed before qualifying particular material for dental applications [18,19,27,30,31]. In addition, surface characteristics are related to other properties of the material, such as mechanical or chemical features, enabling detailed understanding how the material behaves under oral conditions [32,33].
The advanced development of microscopic and spectroscopic techniques enables a detail study of the chemical structure and surface phenomena [20,34] of studied materials. Microscopy enables observation of surfaces, and structural and intra-material changes at high magnification [35,36,37]. It includes, inter alia, Optical Microscopy [38,39,40], Electron Microscopy [39,40,41,42], X-ray Microscopy [39,40], and Scanning Probe Microscopy [39,41].
These techniques allow for advanced experimental research, which in combination with powerful acquisition procedures and data processing, enable detailed analysis of the studied system. Besides morphological and structural characterizations, microscopic techniques provide additionally information on the quantitative and qualitative chemical composition of the analysed sample either at a selected point, or along a given line, thus providing elemental maps (Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy—EDS), crystal orientation (Electron Backscatter Diffraction—EBSD), and many other characteristics of dental biomaterials [40,43,44,45]. The use of microscopic methods for material testing is widely described in the literature; therefore, in this paper we present the application of spectroscopic techniques, basic principles of operation, their advantages and limitations, as well as their application for studying dental materials.
Spectroscopy covers a lot of techniques based on the interaction of the electromagnetic radiation with the matter; sometimes, the term spectroscopy refers to an analytical technique involving generation and interpretation of spectra. The use of spectroscopy, especially in combination with microscopic techniques, provides valuable information on the chemical structure of dental materials. The major advantages of spectroscopic techniques are seen in the fact that they are non-destructive and using small amount of sample weights [34,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Spectroscopic techniques including: Infrared spectroscopy (IR), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR), Raman spectroscopy, Ultraviolet and Visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis), X-ray spectroscopy, and Mass Spectrometry (MS) are very useful in the dental material studies [53].
The aim of the current review was to provide the reader with a “broad view” of spectroscopic techniques and their application in a dental material research.

2. Search Strategy

An electronic search was carried out in SCOPUS and PubMed digital databases using the keywords related to the topic search and combining the keywords using “AND” and “OR”. The search strategy employed was as follows: (Dental material spectroscopic methods) OR Dental material spectroscopy) OR Dental ceramic spectroscopic method) OR Dental ceramics spectroscopy) OR Dental implant spectroscopy) AND (Dental material IR) OR Dental ceramic IR) AND (Dental material FTIR) OR Dental material FT-IR) OR Dental ceramic FTIR) AND ((Dental material Raman spectroscopy) OR Dental ceramic Raman spectroscopy) AND (Dental material UV-Vis spectroscopy) OR Dental material UV-Vis) Dental ceramic UV-Vis spectroscopy) AND (Dental material X-ray spectroscopy) OR Dental ceramic X-ray spectroscopy) AND (Dental material Mass Spectrometry) OR Dental ceramic Mass Spectrometry).
The review of potentially eligible data articles on a given spectroscopic technique was narrowed down to books, book chapters and overviews in Subject Area-Dentistry. If no information could be found in this regard, it was extended to research articles on chemical and material subject fields. The review is mainly based on articles on spectroscopic methods excluding microscopic methods.
Initially 12,904 articles were found. After removal of duplicates and restriction to the years 2008–2021, 1534 articles were identified from digital databases and a manual search. Full texts of papers were obtained from the journals. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for articles are presented in Table 1.

3. Fundamentals and Division of Spectroscopy

For the purpose of a comprehensive overview of spectroscopic techniques, it is necessary to apply various criteria for classification of the techniques. Most often, the following classification criteria are adopted: the range of electromagnetic radiation, properties of the studied systems, and the method of collecting a spectrum, referring to the way of energy exchange between the radiation and the matter. The division of spectroscopy according to the radiation range is actually related to various experimental techniques as listed in Table 2. Depending on the radiation range, different radiation sources, detectors and dispersion devices are used. In optical spectroscopy, prisms and diffraction gratings are most frequently used as dispersion devices [54,55,56,57].
Spectroscopy can be analysed based on the intrinsic aspects of the studied process. In this regard, the following types of spectroscopy can be differentiated: nuclear spectroscopy, atomic spectroscopy, and molecular spectroscopy with particular emphasis on the spectroscopy of condensed systems. Such division is related to the specific energy levels taking part in the energetic transition of the studied system. Each type of spectroscopy is associated with specific motion of the constituents of the system at a microscopic level, and thus differs in the magnitude of the energy between transition energetic states [34,53,58,59].
Depending on the radiation measurement process, one distinguishes three types of spectra: absorption, emission and Raman spectroscopy, respectively. Absorption spectra can be defined as a set of all transitions from lower to higher levels so, they correspond to an increase of the system energy (photon uptake). The simplest type of absorption spectrum arises when the lowest energy level, i.e., the basic level, is occupied. The occupation of energy levels is related to the thermodynamic equilibrium, which is determined by the temperature of the system. It is assumed that only the basic level is filled at room temperature. Emission spectra can be defined as a set of all transitions from higher to lower energy levels. Transitions in emission spectra correspond to the reduction of the energy, i.e., the radiation of photons. The characteristic feature of Raman spectra is the change in the frequency of the scattered radiation (νr) in relation to the frequency of the incident radiation (νp) [60,61].

4. Infrared Spectroscopy (IR) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)

4.1. Principle of the Technique

The area of the electromagnetic spectrum with the wavenumber (reciprocal of the wavelength) from approx. 14,000 to 200 cm−1, i.e., between the visible and the microwave region, is called the infrared (IR). The absorption of such energy amount within this region is large enough to cause the chemical bonds to oscillate, but not enough to cause their breakage. Molecules rotate around their symmetry axes and at the same time their atoms oscillate between equilibrium positions. The IR absorption spectra are obtained by measuring the relative intensity of the transmitted or absorbed radiation as a function of the wavenumber, and they are presented in form of a plot of the transmittance or absorbance of the radiation versus the wavenumber (cm−1).
There are many types of IR spectrophotometers, e.g., filter photometers, double-beam spectrophotometer, Fourier transform spectrometer, attenuated total reflectance (ATR) FT-IR instrument [55]. In modern Fourier transform devices, which consists of illuminating simultaneously the sample with a beam of radiation from the entire tested IR range. After this beam has passed through the sample, the beam from the same source has not been interfered with, and the spectrum is obtained using the Fourier transform of the recorded interference spectrum. This requires the use of equipment with a software that performs this mathematical operation and provides information about vibrations in the form of an interferogram. FT-IR spectroscopy allows to determine the characteristic vibrations of atomic groups of the studied compound.
Due to the fact that the FT-IR spectrum is characteristic for a given substance, infrared spectrophotometric analysis is most often used for qualitative analysis. In addition to characterizing a pure substance by means of FT-IR analysis, the presence of additional substances in a studied mixture, as well as interactions between atomic groups of different compounds in the mixture can be examined. Changes in the spectrum (presence of additional peaks) indicate the presence of other functional groups (presence of another compound), while the shifting of the peaks relative to the spectrum of the original pure compound indicates interactions of a given atomic group with other groups of the studied mixture [61,62]. Besides, the following infrared spectroscopic techniques can be currently differentiated: transmission spectroscopy (TS), internal reflection spectroscopy (IRS), which is also referred to as attenuated total reflection (ATR), mirror reflection (ERS—external reflection spectroscopy), diffuse reflection spectroscopy (DRS), emission spectroscopy (ES) and photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS) [63,64].

4.2. Type of Tested Samples

In infrared spectroscopy substances can be examined in a gaseous, liquid and solid state. Gas-sample spectra can be obtained by inserting the gaseous sample into a purged cuvette. Liquids can be tested in a pure form, or in a solution form. Liquid samples are placed between the sodium chloride plates; approx. One to ten milligrams of a liquid substance is needed. For liquids that dissolve sodium chloride, silver chloride plates can be used instead. Solid samples are typically tested in a form of suspension, pellet, or deposited glassy film (a solid film on a glass substrate). The spectrum of a solid sample most frequently is obtained by dispersing the sample within an alkali halide pellet. The spectra of solids can also be obtained by preparing a film of the solid sample, following evaporation of the solvent from a droplet deposited on a sodium chloride plate of a solution containing the studied compound [55,65].

4.3. Sample Characteristics

FT-IR spectroscopy allows to determine the characteristic vibrations for groups present in a compound. Due to the fact that the FT-IR spectrum is a spectrum characteristic for a given substance, infrared spectrophotometric analysis is most often used for qualitative research. In addition to distinguishing between pure substances by means of FT-IR analysis, it is possible to investigate the presence of additional substances as well as their interactions with individual groups of the original compound. Changes in the spectrum (presence of additional peaks) indicate the presence of other functional groups (presence of another compound), while shifts in the directions of other wavelengths than for the spectrum of the original sample indicate the interaction of a given group with a different group of the added substance [61,62,66].
For example, the FT-IR method was used to identify the structure of a dental material, i.e., fibroin thanks to application of FT-IR, a NH functional group in fibroin was recognised as an amino acid structure with a peak of 3309.80 cm−1 [67]. Measurement of absorbance using FT-IR led to a spectra of the various bioceramic powders and finally their identification [68].

4.4. Advantages and Limitations

Currently, infrared spectroscopy is widely used technique to identify functional groups and chemical compounds (both organic and inorganic), as well as to assess the purity of a compound. It is inexpensive, instruments are easy to be operated, and IR spectra are obtained quickly [55]. Infrared spectroscopy is a promising alternative to other techniques, as it is not time consuming with respect to sample preparation, measurement and interpretation of the results; it is also non-invasive and relatively simple measuring technique. As all frequencies are measured simultaneously in FT-IR spectroscopy, the spectrum is obtained for a few seconds, being advantageous in comparison with conventional infrared spectroscopy measurements lasting [34,69,70,71]. The undoubted advantage of infrared spectroscopy techniques is the ability to test small amounts of the material [62], and in ATR technique, the ability to penetrate of the light beam an into a sample depth of about 0.5–3 µm [72].
The limitation of IR is the fact that in classic spectrometers, the IR spectra are obtained by examining the absorption of a specific beam of monochromatic radiation (one wavelength), and then sweeping the sample by gradually changing the wavelength during measurement with a dispersion element (prism, diffraction grating). Before the measurement, it is often necessary to properly prepare the sample, e.g., grinding the test material, thoroughly mixing with the potassium bromide (KBr) matrix and compressing under pressure to form a tablet. The sample should not contain water, because water strongly absorbs radiation with the wavenumber from approximately 3700 cm−1 and 1630 cm−1 (this absorption may obscure the bands of the tested substance) [55].
In the ATR sampling system, the main source of errors during the measurement is the imperfect contact between the sample and the diamond crystal [65]. The next drawback of FT-IR instruments is the fact that they are equipped only with a single beam, whereas dispersive instruments generally have a double beam [69].

4.5. Applications

IR spectroscopy was used to track the polymerization kinetics of dental resins [73,74] and adhesives [75,76,77,78] to improve the mechanical features of the dental material. The IR technique was also used to determine the role of intermolecular collagen cross-linking in the mechanical behaviour of dentin [79], to evaluate the structure of heterocyclic compounds as candidates for pulp regeneration [80] and to analyse new generation biomimetic materials replicating the mineral organic dentin and enamel complex [81].
The FT-IR technique was used for the structural characterization of dental materials such as: implant materials [82], biopolymers [83], ceramics [84], resin nanocomposites [85], implant coatings [86,87,88], bioceramics [89], resins [90,91,92,93,94], cements [95], bioglass [96], and self-curing materials [97].

4.6. Spectrum Example

Figure 1 shows the FT-IR spectrum of self-curing polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-based dental materials (UNIFAST III, GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) control samples prepared by mixing UNIFAST III resin powder (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with UNIFAST liquid monomer (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The powder spectrum of GC UNIFAST III is depicted in the inset of Figure 1. The band at around 1132 cm−1 is the characteristic absorption vibration of PMMA. The bands at about 1218 cm−1, 1361cm−1, 1735 cm−1 and 2927 cm−1 are assigned to υ(C–O) stretching vibration, wagging vibration of C–H, C=O stretching, and C–H stretching, respectively [97].
Figure 2 shows the FT-IR data of samples prepared by mixing UNIFAST III (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) resin powder with ultrasonic-mixed UNIFAST (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) liquid monomer, which includes starting materials and reinforced, nanosized hexagonal boron nitride h-BN (US Research Nanomaterials Co., Ltd., Houston, TX, USA) at various concentrations. Most researchers agree that there are two distinct IR absorption bands in boron nitride films. These are the band around 1380 cm−1 (in plane) and the band around 780 cm−1 (out of plane), which is due to B–N stretching and B–N–B bending, respectively [97].

5. Raman Spectroscopy

5.1. Principle of Technique

Raman spectroscopy is a technique used to study vibrational-rotational spectra of molecules. In the light scattered by the examined medium, apart from the component with the same frequency as the incident light (Rayleigh scattering), there are components with a changed frequency. The Raman spectrum is represented as a function of the intensity of the scattered light versus the frequency, (wavenumber), which is calculated as a difference between the frequencies of the incident and scattered radiation (Raman shift).
Two main techniques are used to obtain the Raman spectrum: dispersion and Fourier transform (FT). They differ in the wavelength of the incident radiation and the method of detection. Typically, lasers of different wavelengths result in different penetration depths in the sample surface. The shorter the laser wavelength, the information closer to the surface it provides. On the other hand, when the selected laser wavelength is too long, information about the material near the surface may remain hidden (or omitted). Therefore, the selection of the correct laser wavelength is very important to obtain an accurate Raman characterization result, especially in the case of multi-layer substrates or surface sensitive samples. Currently, many new modifications are used in Raman spectroscopy, which primarily increase the sensitivity of the technique, such as: Resonance Raman Spectroscopy (RRS), Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS), Confocal Raman Microscopy and Coherent Antistokes Raman Spectroscopy (CARS). Raman spectroscopy provides a lot of important information about the geometric structure of molecules and the nature of chemical bonds. In the case of crystalline samples, among others, information on the structure, crystal lattice arrangement, elastic properties, stresses and the nature of phase transitions can be obtained. Hence, Raman spectroscopy can be used in qualitative analysis, because each compound is associated with a characteristic Raman spectrum, which is a “dactyloscopic trace”, as well as it provides quantitative information based on the dependence of the intensity of signals on the concentration of substances in the analysed sample [56,98,99,100,101].

5.2. Type of Tested Samples

In the abovementioned techniques, samples can be tested in a wide variety of states; for example, in the form of solids, liquids or vapours, hot or cold, in bulk, as microscopic particles, or as surface layers. Typical accessories for Raman spectroscopy are powder sample holders, cuvette holders, small liquid sample holders (nuclear magnetic resonance sample tubes), and irregularly shaped object clamps [56].

5.3. Sample Characterisctics

In the Raman spectrum, the intensity of the radiation coming from the sample is a linear function of the molar concentration and the thickness of the layer. The Raman spectrum is an oscillating-rotational spectrum that carries information, e.g., about the structure of the test substance and its chemical composition. Raman spectroscopy is now an eminent technique for the characterisation of 2D materials and phonon modes in crystals. Properties, such as number of monolayers, inter-layer breathing and shear modes, in-plane anisotropy, doping, disorder, thermal conductivity, strain and phonon modes can be extracted using Raman spectroscopy [102,103].
For example, Raman mappings confirmed that the graphene nanocoating covering the Biomedical-Grade Ti-6Al-4V alloys showed high structural stability and resistance to mechanical stress and chemical degradation, maintaining >99% coverage after corrosion [104]. Raman spectroscopies have been used to study dental materials were mostly find the degree of conversion (DC) of dental composites, adhesives and setting reaction of cements [103].

5.4. Advantages and Limitations

Similar to other spectroscopic techniques in Raman spectroscopy the time of measurement is short and sample preparation is simple. Additionally, the technique is not invasive and the obtained results can be easily and rapidly analysed [56].
For all spectrometer systems using visible incident light, the main disadvantage is the phenomenon of fluorescence. This is bigger problem in the visible region than in UV or near-infrared region. Since Raman scattering is a weak effect a strong excitation source is required to provide a high-power density in the sample. Hence, besides the fluorescence caused by the tested sample, any tiny impurities that are fluorescent can give large interfering fluorescence signals. Since fluorescence occurs at energies below the excitation value, it can be quite intense in the energy region covered by Raman Stokes scattering [56].

5.5. Applications

Raman spectroscopy was used to determine the rate of polymerization of bioglass ceramic [105], identification and testing of the presence of various compounds in implant materials [106], ceramics [107,108,109], bioglass [110]; analysis of the phase composition of bioglass [111], ceramics [112,113]; and evaluation of the degree of conversion of resins [114] and ceramics [115].

5.6. Spectrum Example

Figure 3a shows seven Raman spectra of bovine (B-Raw) and human (H-Raw) bone powders, calcinated bovine bone powder (B-560) and commercial samples based on β-tricalcium phosphate (RTR, Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France), calcium phosphosilicate combined with polyethylene glycol and glycerine (Novabone®, Osteogenics Biomedical, Lubbock, TX, USA) and hydroxyapatite (Nukbone®, Biocriss, Mexico City, Mexico and Biograft®, Biograft, Mexico City, Mexico). All Raman bands are presented in detail in the article [106]. The bands A, H, O, V, and W correspond to the amide, amine, and DNA atomic groups, while the C and F bands are assigned to C–H groups from proteins and fats of the bone. On the other hand, the bands B, E, G, I, S, U, A′, and G′ (groups C–H) in the Novabone are the organic compounds of PEG and glycerol. Bands corresponding to the carbonate group (CO3) are designated with D, J, and E′. Inorganic phase bands of the samples are designated with K, L, N, O, P, Q, R, Y, Z, A′, B′, C′, D′, and F′, corresponding to the phosphate group (PO4). Finally, the silicate group (SiO3) is represented by the bands M and T. Figure 3b refers to the hydroxyapatite band located at 960 cm−1. Figure 3c shows the full width at the half-maximum (FWHM) of the bands presented in Figure 3b. It is observed that the crystal size affects the width and size of the peak, which may be an indication of the crystalline quality too [106]. Furthermore, Castillo-Paz et al. [116] observed changes of raw hydroxyapatite obtained from porcine bones during heat treatment with heating rates of 2.5 and 5.0 °C/min between 600 °C and 1100 °C. They found that crystal growth and the transition from nano to a micro-size occurred above 700 °C. The result was a narrowing of the analysed Raman band of the characteristic Raman band at 960 cm−1 for ν1 PO43− and a decrease of full width at half the maximum (FWHM), which was confirmed by HR-SEM images and analysis thermogravimetric (TG). A similar effect was observed by Ramirez-Gutierrez et al. [117], who studied the influence of the temperature and sintering time on structural, morphological, thermal, and vibrational properties of hydroxyapatite obtained from pig bone (BHA). They showed that the higher intensity of Raman peaks is associated with an increase in the size of the crystallites. Based on the FWHM, they investigated changes in crystal quality. They found that the FWHM value decreased with increasing crystal quality for samples sintered at 600 °C. Under these conditions, during a longer sintering time, removal of the organic phase takes place without any structural transformation. This treatment preserves the polycrystalline properties of BHA with improved crystal quality. This was confirmed by the results of XRD and SEM.

6. Ultraviolet and Visible Spectroscopy (UV-Vis)

6.1. Principle of Technique

UV-Vis spectroscopy is one of the oldest instrumental techniques. The analysis is based on the measurement of electron spectra generated during transitions between the energy levels of valence electrons in the spectral range of 200–750 nm. Energy absorption in the UV-Vis range can cause electron transitions from the lowest energy baseline (π and n orbitals) to higher energy levels (anti-bonding π* orbitals). The method provides information on the structure of the studied molecule, the presence of conjugated double bond systems and aromatic systems. The instrument used in UV-Vis spectroscopy is the UV-Vis spectrophotometer [53,58,118].

6.2. Type of Tested Samples

Spectroscopic analysis is commonly carried out in solutions, but solids and gases may also be studied. The liquids can be contained in a vessel made of a transparent material such as silica, glass, or plastic, known as a cell or cuvette. Gases can be in similar cells that are sealed or plugged to make them gas-tight. In general, measurements are performed for compounds are demonstrated absorption in the UV-Vis range, which contain chromophores and auxochromes in their structure; within them, there is an electronic transition from the ground to the excited state. Absorption in the UV-Vis range is demonstrated by compounds that contain chromophores and auxochromes in their structure; within them, there is an electronic transition from the ground state to the excited state [53,119,120,121].

6.3. Sample Characteristics

According to Beer Lambert’s law, the measurement of the absorbance of a certain substance in a solution is directly proportional to its concentration; hence absorption spectroscopy can be used for quantitative analysis. Therefore, the technique is an excellent analytical tool for the characterization and evaluation of many materials, including biomaterials and dental composites [100].

6.4. Advantages and Limitations

UV-Vis spectroscopy is used for both qualitative and quantitative analysis. Its main advantages are its high sensitivity [119,122], high marking precision [119] and selectivity of determinations [58]. The objective measure for the sensitivity of spectrophotometric method is the molar absorptivity ε, corresponding to the λmax of the tested solution. The ε values for the sensitive methods are above 10,000 dm3 mol−1 cm−1, and the ε coefficient with values below 1000 dm3 mol−1 cm−1 corresponds to the less sensitive methods [119,122]. The accuracy of the determination depends on the concentration range and the class of devices used [119]. It is conditioned by the efficiency of absorption and the selectivity of reagents causing a coloured product with the substance to be analysed [58].
Organic compounds with chromophore groups, in which an electronic transition from the ground state to the excited state can occur, are capable of absorbing radiation in the UV-Vis range. Most frequently aromatic systems and groups with multiple bonds (e.g., >C=C<, >C=O, –N=N–, –NO2) are chromophores [119].

6.5. Applications

UV-Vis spectroscopy has been applied to study fillers for dental adhesive resins [123], to assess the risk of chemical irritation, allergic reactions and oral hypersensitivity due to the elution of polymers [124], to evaluate new co-initiators useful in the radical photopolymerization of dental polymers [94,125]. This technique was also used to characterize the colour and spectral reflectance and thickness oxide layer [126] and resin [127], to evaluate the transparency of ceramics [128,129], and to assesses the degradation rate of CH-based scaffolds which play a key role in endodontic regeneration periodontal regeneration material [130].

6.6. Spectrum Example

Figure 4 shows the UV-Vis spectra from the camphorquinone (CQ) and the coinitiators ethyl-4-dimethylaminobenzoate (EDAB), monomers with tertiary amines and four methacrylic (MBTTM) or acrylic (MBTTA) useful in dentistry. The CQ exhibits a strong absorption band in the UV region due to π → π* transition and an absorption band in the visible region at 445 nm (transition n → π*), with a low extinction coefficient. This absorption band at 445 nm gives to CQ the ability to be used as photoinitiator in the visible region, allowing to form an excited state and the subsequent hydrogen abstraction from the coinitiator. Finally, in the case of EDAB, MBTTA and MBTTM used as hydrogen donors, they show only absorption bands in the ultraviolet region, with high extinction coefficient values [94].

7. X-ray Spectroscopy

7.1. Principle of Technique

X-rays constitute a part of the spectrum of electromagnetic waves covering the wavelength range from 10−9–10−12 m. They are generated in the X-ray tube during the bombardment of the anode (anti-cathode) with a beam of electrons emitted by the cathode and accelerated in the electric field to a high speed. The X-ray spectrum of the anode material consists of lines associated with the corresponding electron transitions characteristic for a given element. X-ray analysis is possible after splitting it into separate lines. X-rays can be detected with an energy dispersed spectrometer (EDS) or a wavelength dispersed spectrometer (WDS). The analysis can be performed point by point or can be mapped. Elemental analyses are quantified by comparison with standard reference materials.
There are other methods of X-ray spectroscopy that are used in the dental materials testing, such as X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES), X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). In the XAS method the relationship between the X-ray intensities before and after passing through the sample of defined thickness is investigated. The XES is the method in which the relaxation products of the interaction of photon or electron beams with the sample is studied. This method is related to the spontaneous emission of X-ray photons in the dipole transition between two electronic states. The XRF is an analytical method that measures the emission of the characteristic secondary or fluorescent X-rays from an excited sample bombarded with a high-energy radiation. Another, relatively new technique is the total-reflection X-ray fluorescence (TXRF), where the total reflection effect is obtained by irradiating the sample, placed on a suitable support (quartz), with the primary radiation from the X-ray tube at an angle smaller than the boundary angle [57,60,131,132,133,134,135].
The XPS method measures the kinetic energy of the emitted electrons from the upper layers of the analysed material (1–10 nm), as a result of the exciting a samples surface with X-rays. XPS allows you to determine what elements are in the ultra-thin layers and thin surface layers of the material, the chemical state and the amount of the element detected. The XRD method is based on measuring the intensity and scattering angles of X-rays, leaving the material with the same energy as the incident radiation. There are many databases of XRD spectra, so that there is rapid phase identification for many different crystal samples [136].

7.2. Type of Tested Samples

For testing dental materials, XRF and XRD are mainly used X-ray techniques. The XRF method is used to study metals, ceramics and glass, and the test samples can be of almost any shape and in a form of a powder, paste, solid or liquid. The TXRF method enables the analysis of solutions, thin layers, solids, and different surfaces [137]. Mostly solids are used in XRD testing. The preparation should have a flat and smooth surface. The technique of shaping the preparation consists in filling the window in the aluminium holder with a powder sample and gently pressing the glass plate on the preparation surface [138,139].

7.3. Sample Characteristics

Methods using X-rays allow for the analysis of the elemental composition in a small area closely adjacent to or being the surface of the test sample. For example, the effects of high temperature are observed on different restorative dental materials by detecting changes in their microstructural and elemental composition and using X-ray spectroscopy to determine the content of trace elements. The ability to distinguish dental materials by elemental analyses has had an important impact on the identification process [140,141].

7.4. Advantages and Limitations

The XRF method is used in both qualitative and quantitative analysis. The advantage of this method is the good selectivity and low quantification limit. The XRF method is of particular importance in the case of surface analysis. In the trace analysis 10−9 g of the substance can be determined in a sample weighing about 0.1 g. The technique is non-destructive, which is an additional advantage. The TXRF method can determine trace amounts of elements in the range of 10−7–10−12 g in 1 g of a sample; small samples (approx. 5·10−2 cm3) can be used [57,60,131,132,133,134,135].
In the XRF method, it is necessary to use special crystals instead of diffraction gratings; it is only suitable for the analysis of elements with low excitation potential and the presence of matrix effects [57,60,131,132,133,134,135]. XRD is a technique that characterizes only crystalline materials [136].

7.5. Applications

The XRF is used to test the composition of materials, the coating thickness, and to identify elements in dental materials: implant alloy [142] and ceramics [143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152]. XRD is used to obtain information of crystalline structure of solids such as dental ceramics [143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150].

7.6. Spectrum Example

Figure 5 shows that the crystalline phases resulting from the heat treatment of the glass sample were determined using XRD. Diffraction images were obtained in the range of 2θ from 15° to 90° continuously at 0.6°/min. XRD results proved that spherulite crystals detected in the early phase of crystallization were enstatite [143].

8. Mass Spectrometry (MS)

8.1. Principle of Operation

Mass spectrometry is an analytical technique used to test or confirm the structure of organic compounds as well as to conduct qualitative and quantitative determination of specific compounds present in a mixture. It enables detecting substances in complex chemical mixtures even in minimal amounts (femtograms). The mode of action of each spectrometer, regardless of its construction, is based on the molecule ionization of the tested substance, allowing for their acceleration in an electric field under vacuum. The heterogeneous flux of positive or negative ions is split into a number of components depending on the mass to charge ratio (m/z). From the weight to charge ratio of an ion, it is usually possible to deduce the molecular weight of the studied compound or the molecular weight of its fragments. The ionization methods in some mass spectrometers are chosen such that the charge (z) is 1 for most ions, so when interpreting the spectrum, it can be assumed that m/z corresponds simply to the molecular weight of the ion. Sample ionization in mass spectroscopy can be performed using one of the following methods: Electron Ionisation, (EI) Electrospray (ESI) Fast-Atom Bombardment (FAB), Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS), Laser Desorption (LD), Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation (MALDI), and Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP). Research indicates that secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) is a sensitive technique that characterizes biomaterials and biomineralized bone and dental tissues [153,154,155,156,157].

8.2. Type of Tested Samples

Samples such as metals, ceramics, organic and biological materials, polymers, biomaterials, and composites can be analysed. For SIMS testing, samples must be compatible with high vacuum, have a flat surface with minimal topography, and must not contain any “loose parts” that could enter the mass analyser and damage it [156].

8.3. Sample Characteristics

Mass spectrometry is an analytical technique based on measuring the mass to electric charge ratio of a given ion. Interpretation of the obtained data allows for the identification of chemical compounds. It enables the determination of their source of origin, precise determination of the composition of complex mixtures of compounds with high molar masses, research on dental materials and polymer chemistry [158,159]. For example, this information can be used to explain the organic composition and eluates of three resin-based pulp coatings in relation to their indications and safety data sheets [159], or to determine the molecular toxicology of substances released by dental materials [160].

8.4. Advantages and Limitations

The Time of Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) is a qualitative technique used to analyse surface characteristics that provides information related to molecular compounds, typically fragments of much larger organic macromolecules from the outermost surface of the sample [153]. This surface technique is considered highly sensitive.
The SIMS technique combines high mass resolution and the possibility of quantifying elements with the limitation that only a fixed number of predefined ions can be analysed simultaneously (up to seven ions). Due to the high sensitivity of this technique, only high purity solvents should be used [156]. This equipment has limited optical capabilities; experiencing difficulties in collecting positive or negative ion data and, depending on the type of sample, analysis may last from 30 min to 5 h. After testing, the surface of tested sample is left damaged. The technique provides complementary information to XPS technique [153].

8.5. Applications

The SIMS technique is used to analyse the composition and chemical interactions of dental resins [161,162], ceramics [161,162,163,164,165] and composite materials [166].

8.6. Spectrum Example

Appropriately prepared zirconium oxide samples together with silane-containing primer (MPS), and 10-Methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate primer (MDP) were subjected to the ToF-SIMS test. Figure 6 shows ToF-SIMS spectra of the studied system. The peaks of Zr+ and ZrO+ were used as references peaks in the cumulative positive ion spectra (Figure 6A). All groups showed the presence of C2H3+ and C3H5+ derived from organic contamination. All groups show the characteristic ions ZrO2 (121.9) and ZrO (138.9), while many differences are revealed among the five treatments in the negative ion spectra from m/z of 0 to 200 (Figure 6B). OH and C2H appear in all spectra, which might be caused by the water adsorption and organic contamination after exposure on air. The increased intensity at m/z 122 was caused by the accretion of SiO3C3H9 (121) on ZrO2 (121.9) [161].

9. Summary and Future Aspect

The article presents a review of spectroscopic methods for characterizing surfaces and application in the study of various state-of-the-art dental materials, i.e., ceramics, steel, glasses, cements, composites and resins. The review describes application of different type of spectroscopy such as infrared (FT-IR, and Raman), ultraviolet and visible: (UV-Vis), X-ray (XAS, XES, XRF, XRD) and mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS).
Table 3 shows the use of spectroscopic methods for studying dental materials, together with the depth of the analysed layer, the nature of information provided (element, depth profile, surface mapping, chemical groups and bonds, etc.) and sample damage (or lack thereof). According to the last criterion, most of the techniques are non-destructive, and some of them—using X-rays for excitation—are almost non-invasive.
As expected, it turns out that not all methods can be generally applied to different types of biomaterial; only some techniques proved to be excellent in certain types of applications. Each method has its own specificity; therefore, the optimization of the approach depends on the correct selection of the method. This is possible due to the wide range of possibilities for characterizing studied materials.
The purpose of this overview is to facilitate the application of these techniques in the field of dental materials orientation in the drawn image. Of course, a single method cannot provide all of required information; in terms of dental materials, no method can provide complete sample information at all levels. Usually, several complementary methods of mutual confirmation and support were used in the study of a given material. However, the complementarity of the provided information were at different levels of elemental composition, chemistry and structure. The research in the field of dental materials has fully benefited from the multi-method approach, which is particularly suitable as no suitable reference materials are yet available for most of the cases. Therefore, the problem of standards has been carefully considered as it provides the most accurate solution to the correction of matrix effects. The latter are inherent especially in the case of thicker preparations, which is usually the most convenient form of preparation of dental materials. We hope this review helps dentists choose the appropriate method and sample preparation, and help the chemist to optimize the experiment setup according to the specimen characteristics.
The current representative literature review is by no means comprehensive (which would probably grow to around a thousand titles). Figure 7 presents the number of publications on the use of spectroscopic methods in the study of dental materials and related topics based on 4173 titles, indicating that this field is progressively growing.
Within the period 2000–2020, an increase in the number of publications can be noticed. The data suggest that the use of spectroscopic methods to characterize surfaces in the study of dental materials has reached maturity; though it is a highly specialized, the filed shows a high and sustained dynamics. X-ray spectroscopy and FT-IR techniques are the most popular among researchers. Due to the characteristics of these methods, it can be expected their will continue in the upcoming years, especially as dental materials—despite enormous advances made in recent decades—still have many imperfections and the number of experimental objects will increase worldwide.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.K. and M.L.-S.; methodology, M.L.-S.; software, A.L.; validation, A.L., B.L. and S.S.; formal analysis, K.K.; investigation, K.K.; resources, B.L.; data curation, A.L.; writing—original draft preparation, K.K.; writing—review and editing, B.L. and M.L.-S.; visualization, K.K. and A.L.; supervision, S.S.; project administration, S.S. and M.L.-S.; funding acquisition, M.L.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Centre for Research and Development (Warsaw, Poland) within the grant InterChemMed (WND-POWR.03.02.00-00-I029/16-01).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Valentin Mircerski (University of Lodz, Poland) for fruitful discussion on the problems presented in the work.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.

References

  1. Alzahrani, K.M. Implant Bio-mechanics for Successful Implant Therapy: A Systematic Review. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Commun. Dent. 2020, 10, 700–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yu, S.H.; Hao, J.; Fretwurst, T.; Liu, M.; Kostenuik, P.; Giannobile, W.V.; Jin, Q. Sclerostin-Neutralizing Antibody Enhances Bone Regeneration Around Oral Implants. Tissue Eng. Part A 2018, 24, 1672–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Beltramini, G.; Russillo, A.; Baserga, C.; Pellati, A.; Piva, A.; Candotto, V.; Bolzoni, A.; Beltramini, G.; Rossi, D.; Bolzoni, A.; et al. Collagenated heterologous cortico-cancelleus bone mix stimulated dental pulp derived stem cells. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2020, 34, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Jiang, X.; Cao, Z.; Yao, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Liao, W. Aesthetic evaluation of the labiolingual position of maxillary lateral incisors by orthodontists and laypersons. BMC Oral Health 2021, 21, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gomez-Meda, R.; Esquivel, J.; Blatz, M.B. The esthetic biological contour concept for implant restoration emergence profile design. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2021, 33, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Furukawa, M.; Wang, J.; Kurosawa, M.; Ogiso, N.; Shikama, Y.; Kanekura, T.; Matsushita, K. Effect of green propolis extracts on experimental aged gingival irritation in vivo and in vitro. J. Oral Biosci. 2021, 63, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Koutouzis, T. Implant-abutment connection as contributing factor to peri-implant diseases. Periodontology 2000 2019, 81, 152–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Birch, S.; Ahern, S.; Brocklehurst, P.; Chikte, U.; Gallagher, J.; Listl, S.; Lalloo, R.; O’Malley, L.; Rigby, J.; Tickle, M.; et al. Planning the oral health workforce: Time for innovation. Commun. Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2021, 49, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Joda, T.; Yeung, A.W.K.; Hung, K.; Zitzmann, N.U.; Bornstein, M.M. Disruptive Innovation in Dentistry: What It Is and What Could Be Next. J. Dent. Res. 2020, 100, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Joda, T.; Bornstein, M.M.; Jung, R.E.; Ferrari, M.; Waltimo, T.; Zitzmann, N.U. Recent trends and future direction of dental research in the digital era. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bastos, N.A.; Bitencourt, S.B.; Martins, E.A.; De Souza, G.M. Review of nano-technology applications in resin-based restorative materials. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Glied, A.; Mundiya, J. Implant Material Sciences. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 65, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Saeidi Pour, R.; Freitas, R.C.; Engler, M.L.P.D.; Edelhoff, D.; Klaus, G.; Prandtner, O.; Berthold, M.; Liebermann, A. Historical development of root analogue implants: A review of published papers. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2019, 57, 496–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wojda, S.M. Comparative Analysis of Two Methods of Assessment Wear of Dental Materials. Acta Mech. Autom. 2015, 9, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Duhn, C.; Thalji, G.; Al-Tarwaneh, S.; Cooper, L.F. A digital approach to robust and esthetic implant overdenture construction. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2021, 33, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Deb, S.; Chana, S. Biomaterials in Relation to Dentistry. Front. Oral Biol. 2015, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Orsini, G.; Pagella, P.; Mitsiadis, T.A. Modern Trends in Dental Medicine: An Update for Internists. Am. J. Med. 2018, 131, 1425–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Guglielmotti, M.B.; Olmedo, D.G.; Cabrini, R.L. Research on implants and osseointegration. Periodontology 2000 2019, 79, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Y.; Kelly, J.R. Dental Ceramics for Restoration and Metal Veneering. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2017, 61, 797–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bhatavadekar, N.B.; Gharpure, A.S.; Balasubramanium, N.; Scheyer, E.T. In Vitro Surface Testing Methods for Dental Implants-Interpretation and Clinical Relevance: A Review. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2020, 41, e1–e9. [Google Scholar]
  21. Meschi, N.; Patel, B.; Ruparel, N.B. Material Pulp Cells and Tissue Interactions. J. Endod. 2020, 46, S150–S160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cionca, N.; Hashim, D.; Mombelli, A. Zirconia dental implants: Where are we now, and where are we heading? Periodontology 2000 2017, 73, 241–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Della Bona, A.; Cantelli, V.; Britto, V.T.; Collares, K.F.; Stansbury, J.W. 3D printing restorative materials using a stereolithographic technique: A systematic review. Dent. Mater. 2021, 37, 336–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Y.; Bäumer, D.; Ozga, A.K.; Körner, G.; Bäumer, A. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life 10 years after implant placement. BMC Oral Health 2021, 21, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Eick, S. Biofilms. Monogr. Oral Sci. 2020, 29, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  26. Díaz-Garrido, N.; Lozano, C.P.; Kreth, J.; Giacaman, R.A. Competition and Caries on Enamel of a Dual-Species Biofilm Model with Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sterzenbach, T.; Helbig, R.; Hannig, C.; Hannig, M. Bioadhesion in the oral cavity and approaches for biofilm management by surface modifications. Clin. Oral Investig. 2020, 24, 4237–4260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bhadila, G.; Menon, D.; Wang, X.; Vila, T.; Melo, M.A.S.; Montaner, S.; Arola, D.D.; Weir, M.D.; Sun, J.; Xu, H.H.K. Long-term antibacterial activity and cytocompatibility of novel low-shrinkage-stress, remineralizing composites. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2021, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tettamanti, L.; Cura, F.; Andrisani, C.; Bassi, M.A.; Silvestre-Rangil, J.; Tagliabue, A. A new implant-abutment connection for bacterial microleakage prevention: An in vitro study. ORAL Implantol. 2017, 10, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Revilla-León, M.; Morillo, J.A.; Att, W.; Özcan, M. Chemical Composition, Knoop Hardness, Surface Roughness, and Adhesion Aspects of Additively Manufactured Dental Interim Materials. J. Prosthodont. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ercoli, C.; Caton, J.G. Dental prostheses and tooth-related factors. J. Periodontol. 2018, 89, S223–S236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Revilla-León, M.; Husain, N.A.H.; Methani, M.M.; Özcan, M. Chemical composition, surface roughness, and ceramic bond strength of additively manufactured cobalt-chromium dental alloys. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Revilla-León, M.; Meyers, M.J.; Zandinejad, A.; Özcan, M. A review on chemical composition, mechanical properties, and manufacturing work flow of additively manufactured current polymers for interim dental restorations. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2019, 31, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Preoteasa, E.A.; Preoteasa, E.S.; Suciu, I.; Bartok, R.N. Atomic and nuclear surface analysis methods for dental materials: A review. AIMS Mater. Sci. 2018, 5, 781–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Karova, E. Application of Atomic Force Microscopy in Dental Investigations. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2020, 9, 1319–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Roa, J.J.; Oncins, G.; Díaz, J.; Capdevila, X.G.; Sanz, F.; Segarra, M. Study of the friction, adhesion and mechanical properties of single crystals, ceramics and ceramic coatings by AFM. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 31, 429–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vilá, J.F.; García, J.C.; Guestrin, A. SEM Applied to the Development of Bioactive Surface of Dental Implants. Microsc. Microanal. 2020, 26, 147–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Banaszek, K.; Sawicki, J.; Wołowiec-Korecka, E.; Gorzędowski, J.; Danowska-Klonowska, D.; Sokołowski, J. Use of optical microscopy for evaluation of tooth structure. J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. 2016, 79, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chander, N.G. Characterization of dental materials. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 2018, 18, 289–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhou, X.; Thompson, G.E. Electron and Photon Based Spatially Resolved Techniques. In Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yanikoglu, N.D.; Sakarya, R.E. Test methods used in the evaluation of the structure features of the restorative materials: A literature review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 9720–9734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Naves, L.Z.; Gerdolle, D.A.; de Andrade, O.S.; Markus Maria Gresnigt, M. Seeing is believing? When scanning electron microscopy (SEM) meets clinical dentistry: The replica technique. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2020, 83, 1118–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Siekaniec, D.; Kopyciński, D. Analysis Phases and Crystallographic Orientation of the grain of High Chromium Cast Iron Using EBSD Technique. J. Cast. Mater. Eng. 2017, 1, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Koblischka-Veneva, A.; Koblischka, M.R.; Schmauch, J.; Hannig, M. Comparison of human and bovine dental enamel by TEM and t-EBSD investigations. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 625, 012006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tomota, Y. Crystallographic characterization of steel microstructure using neutron diffraction. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2019, 20, 1189–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Shukla, A.K. Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy in Medicine; Shukla, A.K., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; ISBN 9789811322303. [Google Scholar]
  47. Pandoleon, P.; Kontonasaki, E.; Kantiranis, N.; Pliatsikas, N.; Patsalas, P.; Papadopoulou, L.; Zorba, T.; Paraskevopoulos, K.M.; Koidis, P. Aging of 3Y-TZP dental zirconia and yttrium depletion. Dent. Mater. 2017, 33, e385–e392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lopes, C.d.C.A.; Limirio, P.H.J.O.; Novais, V.R.; Dechichi, P. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) application chemical characterization of enamel, dentin and bone. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2018, 53, 747–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lach, S.; Jurczak, P.; Karska, N.; Kubiś, A.; Szymańska, A.; Rodziewicz-Motowidło, S. Spectroscopic methods used in implant material studies. Molecules 2020, 25, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kreve, S.; Cândido dos Reis, A. Influence of the electrostatic condition of the titanium surface on bacterial adhesion: A systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2021, 125, 416–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kim, I.H.; Son, J.S.; Min, B.K.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, K.H.; Kwon, T.Y. A simple, sensitive and non-destructive technique for characterizing bovine dental enamel erosion: Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2016, 8, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Furuhashi, K.; Uo, M.; Kitagawa, Y.; Watari, F. Rapid and non-destructive analysis of metallic dental restorations using X-ray fluorescence spectra and light-element sampling tools. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 262, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Malik, A.K.; Kumar, R. Heena Spectroscopy: Types. In Encyclopedia of Food and Health; Elsevier Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 64–72. ISBN 9780123849533. [Google Scholar]
  54. Pignataro, M.F.; Herrera, M.G.; Dodero, V.I. Evaluation of peptide/protein self-assembly and aggregation by spectroscopic methods. Molecules 2020, 25, 4854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kafle, B.P. Infrared (IR) spectroscopy. In Chemical Analysis and Material Characterization by Spectrophotometry; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 199–243. [Google Scholar]
  56. Smith, E.; Dent, G. Modern Raman Spectroscopy—A Practical Approach. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2005; p. 210. ISBN 0471496685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dolenko, G.N.; Poleshchuk, O.K.; Latosińska, J.N. X-ray emission spectroscopy, methods. In Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 691–694. ISBN 9780128032244. [Google Scholar]
  58. Sharma, R.K. Various Spectroscopic Techniques. In Environmental Pollution: Monitoring Modelling and Control; Studium Press, LLC: Houston, TX, USA, 2017; pp. 181–206. ISBN ISBN:1626991022/978-1626991026. [Google Scholar]
  59. Patonay, G.; Beckford, G.; Hänninen, P. UV-Vis and NIR Fluorescence Spectroscopy. In Handbook of Spectroscopy, 2nd Enlarged ed.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2014; Volume 3–4, pp. 999–1036. ISBN 9783527654703. [Google Scholar]
  60. Adams, F.C. X-ray absorption and Diffraction | Overview. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Science; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 391–403. ISBN 9780081019832. [Google Scholar]
  61. Brader, M.L. UV-absorbance, fluorescence and FT-IR spectroscopy in biopharmaceutical development. In Biophysical Characterization of Proteins in Developing Biopharmaceuticals; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 97–121. ISBN 9780444641731. [Google Scholar]
  62. Akhtar, S.; Ali, S. Characterization of nanomaterials: Techniques and tools. In Applications of Nanomaterials in Human Health; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 23–43. ISBN 9789811548024. [Google Scholar]
  63. Fa, K.; Jiang, T.; Nalaskowski, J.; Miller, J.D. Optical and spectroscopic characteristics of oleate adsorption as revealed by FTIR analysis. Langmuir 2004, 20, 5311–5321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Le Pevelen, D.D.; Tranter, G.E. FT-IR and raman spectroscopies, polymorphism applications. In Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 750–761. ISBN 9780128032244. [Google Scholar]
  65. Bell, S.E.J.; Xu, Y. Infrared spectroscopy|Industrial applications. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Science; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 124–133. ISBN 9780081019832. [Google Scholar]
  66. Kowalczuk, D.; Pitucha, M. Application of FTIR Method for the Assessment of Immobilization of Active Substances in the Matrix of Biomedical Materials. Materials 2019, 12, 2972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Puspita, S.; Sunarintyas, S.; Mulyawati, E.; Anwar, C.; Sukirno; Soesatyo, M.H.N.E. Molecular weight determination and structure identification of Bombyx mori L. Fibroin as material in dentistry. In AIP Conference Proceedings; American Institute of Physics Inc.: College, MA, USA, 2020; Volume 2260, p. 40018. [Google Scholar]
  68. Rafeek, A.D.; Choi, G.; Evans, L.A. Morphological, spectroscopic and crystallographic studies of calcium phosphate bioceramic powders. J. Aust. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 54, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Dutta, A. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. In Spectroscopic Methods for Nanomaterials Characterization; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Volume 2, pp. 73–93. ISBN 9780323461467. [Google Scholar]
  70. Rosi, F.; Cartechini, L.; Sali, D.; Miliani, C. Recent trends in the application of fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy in Heritage Science: From micro: From non-invasive FT-IR. Phys. Sci. Rev. 2019, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Margariti, C. The application of FTIR microspectroscopy in a non-invasive and non-destructive way to the study and conservation of mineralised excavated textiles. Herit. Sci. 2019, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Munajad, A.; Subroto, C. Suwarno Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analysis of transformer paper in mineral oil-paper composite insulation under accelerated thermal aging. Energies 2018, 11, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Puppin-Rontani, J.; Fugolin, A.P.P.; Costa, A.R.; Correr-Sobrinho, L.; Pfeifer, C.S. In vitro performance of 2-step, total etch adhesives modified by thiourethane additives. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2020, 103, 102688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shim, J.S.; Lee, S.Y.; Song, S.-Y.; Jha, N.; Ryu, J.J. Polymerization efficiency of dental dual-cured resin cement light-cured at various times after the initiation of chemical activation. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2020, 69, 622–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Fugolin, A.P.; Lewis, S.; Logan, M.G.; Ferracane, J.L.; Pfeifer, C.S. Methacrylamide–methacrylate hybrid monomers for dental applications. Dent. Mater. 2020, 36, 1028–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fugolin, A.P.; Dobson, A.; Ferracane, J.L.; Pfeifer, C.S. Effect of residual solvent on performance of acrylamide-containing dental materials. Dent. Mater. 2019, 35, 1378–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Fugolin, A.P.P.; Navarro, O.; Logan, M.G.; Huynh, V.; França, C.M.; Ferracane, J.L.; Pfeifer, C.S. Synthesis of di- and triacrylamides with tertiary amine cores and their evaluation as monomers in dental adhesive interfaces. Acta Biomater. 2020, 115, 148–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Fugolin, A.P.; Dobson, A.; Huynh, V.; Mbiya, W.; Navarro, O.; Franca, C.M.; Logan, M.; Merritt, J.L.; Ferracane, J.L.; Pfeifer, C.S. Antibacterial, ester-free monomers: Polymerization kinetics, mechanical properties, biocompatibility and anti-biofilm activity. Acta Biomater. 2019, 100, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Alania, Y.; dos Reis, M.C.; Nam, J.-W.; Phansalkar, R.S.; McAlpine, J.; Chen, S.-N.; Pauli, G.F.; Bedran-Russo, A.K. A dynamic mechanical method to assess bulk viscoelastic behavior of the dentin extracellular matrix. Dent. Mater. 2020, 36, 1536–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, P.; Zhao, X.M. Synthesis, crystal structure and bioactivity evaluation of a heterocyclic compound. Jiegou Huaxue 2020, 39, 1892–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Seredin, P.V.; Uspenskaya, O.A.; Goloshchapov, D.L.; Ippolitov, I.Y.; Vongsvivut, J.; Ippolitov, Y.A. Organic-mineral interaction between biomimetic materials and hard dental tissues. Sovrem. Tehnol. V Med. 2020, 12, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gurgenc, T. Structural characterization and dielectrical properties of Ag-doped nano-strontium apatite particles produced by hydrothermal method. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1223, 128990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jing, X.; Xie, B.; Li, X.; Dai, Y.; Nie, L.; Li, C. Peptide decorated demineralized dentin matrix with enhanced bioactivity, osteogenic differentiation via carboxymethyl chitosan. Dent. Mater. 2021, 37, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ramos, N.C.; Alves, L.M.M.; Ricco, P.; Santos, G.M.A.S.; Bottino, M.A.; Campos, T.M.B.; Melo, R.M. Strength and bondability of a dental Y-TZP after silica sol-gel infiltrations. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 17018–17024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Asadi, F.; Forootanfar, H.; Ranjbar, M. A facile one-step preparation of Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2/Li-BioMOFs resin nanocomposites with Glycyrrhiza glabra (licorice) root juice as green capping agent and mechanical properties study. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2020, 48, 1331–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Fu, D.; Lu, Y.; Gao, S.; Peng, Y.; Duan, H. Chemical Property and Antibacterial Activity of Metronidazole-decorated Ti through Adhesive Dopamine. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. Ed. 2019, 34, 968–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yakufu, M.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Jiao, Z.; Guo, M.; Liu, J.; Zhang, P. Covalently functionalized poly(etheretherketone) implants with osteogenic growth peptide (OGP) to improve osteogenesis activity. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 9777–9785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Ding, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X.; Zu, H.; Wang, C.; Dong, D.; Lyu, M.; Wang, S. Immobilization of Dextranase on Nano-Hydroxyapatite as a Recyclable Catalyst. Materials 2020, 14, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Roopavath, U.K.; Sah, M.K.; Panigrahi, B.B.; Rath, S.N. Mechanochemically synthesized phase stable and biocompatible β-tricalcium phosphate from avian eggshell for the development of tissue ingrowth system. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 12910–12919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zeng, W.; Liu, F.; He, J. Physicochemical Properties of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA Dental Resin Reinforced with Silanized Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Silicon 2019, 11, 1345–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Voicu, G.; Didilescu, A.C.; Stoian, A.B.; Dumitriu, C.; Greabu, M.; Andrei, M. Mineralogical and microstructural characteristics of two dental pulp capping materials. Materials 2019, 12, 1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Yushau, U.S.; Almofeez, L.; Bozkurt, A. Novel Polymer Nanocomposites Comprising Triazole Functional Silica for Dental Application. Silicon 2020, 12, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Agha, A.; Parker, S.; Patel, M. Polymerization shrinkage kinetics and degree of conversion of commercial and experimental resin modified glass ionomer luting cements (RMGICs). Dent. Mater. 2020, 36, 893–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Pérez-Mondragón, A.A.; Cuevas-Suárez, C.E.; González-López, J.A.; Trejo-Carbajal, N.; Herrera-González, A.M. Evaluation of new coinitiators of camphorquinone useful in the radical photopolymerization of dental monomers. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2020, 403, 112844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Alotaibi, J.; Saji, S.; Swain, M.V. FTIR characterization of the setting reaction of biodentineTM. Dent. Mater. 2018, 34, 1645–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Dinesh Kumar, S.; Mohamed Abudhahir, K.; Selvamurugan, N.; Vimalraj, S.; Murugesan, R.; Srinivasan, N.; Moorthi, A. Formulation and biological actions of nano-bioglass ceramic particles doped with Calcarea phosphorica for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 83, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Alqahtani, M. Effect of hexagonal boron nitride nanopowder reinforcement and mixing methods on physical and mechanical properties of self-cured PMMA for dental applications. Materials 2020, 13, 2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kafle, B.P. Raman spectroscopy. In Chemical Analysis and Material Characterization by Spectrophotometry; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 245–268. [Google Scholar]
  99. Marcott, C.; Padalkar, M.; Pleshko, N. 3.23 Infrared and raman microscopy and imaging of biomaterials at the micro and nano scale. In Comprehensive Biomaterials II; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 498–518. ISBN 9780081006924. [Google Scholar]
  100. Omidi, M.; Fatehinya, A.; Farahani, M.; Akbari, Z.; Shahmoradi, S.; Yazdian, F.; Tahriri, M.; Moharamzadeh, K.; Tayebi, L.; Vashaee, D. Characterization of biomaterials. In Biomaterials for Oral and Dental Tissue Engineering; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 97–115. ISBN 9780081009673. [Google Scholar]
  101. Xu, Z.; He, Z.; Song, Y.; Fu, X.; Rommel, M.; Luo, X.; Hartmaier, A.; Zhang, J.; Fang, F. Topic review: Application of raman spectroscopy characterization in micro/nano-machining. Micromachines 2018, 9, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Jones, R.R.; Hooper, D.C.; Zhang, L.; Wolverson, D.; Valev, V.K. Raman Techniques: Fundamentals and Frontiers. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Khan, A.S.; Khalid, H.; Sarfraz, Z.; Khan, M.; Iqbal, J.; Muhammad, N.; Fareed, M.A.; Rehman, I.U. Vibrational spectroscopy of selective dental restorative materials. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2017, 52, 507–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Malhotra, R.; Han, Y.M.; Morin, J.L.P.; Luong-Van, E.K.; Chew, R.J.J.; Castro Neto, A.H.; Nijhuis, C.A.; Rosa, V. Inhibiting Corrosion of Biomedical-Grade Ti-6Al-4V Alloys with Graphene Nanocoating. J. Dent. Res. 2020, 99, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Gomes de Araújo-Neto, V.; Sebold, M.; Fernandes de Castro, E.; Feitosa, V.P.; Giannini, M. Evaluation of physico-mechanical properties and filler particles characterization of conventional, bulk-fill, and bioactive resin-based composites. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021, 115, 104288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Zubieta-Otero, L.F.; Londoño-Restrepo, S.M.; Lopez-Chavez, G.; Hernandez-Becerra, E.; Rodriguez-Garcia, M.E. Comparative study of physicochemical properties of bio-hydroxyapatite with commercial samples. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 259, 124201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Gutierrez, M.F.; Perdigao, J.; Malaquias, P.; Cardenas, A.M.; Siqueira, F.; Hass, V.; Reis, A.; Loguercio, A.D. Effect of methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate-containing silane and adhesive used alone or in combination on the bond strength and chemical interaction with zirconia ceramics under thermal aging. Oper. Dent. 2020, 45, 516–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Lubas, M. Au interface effect on Ti-dental porcelain bond strength investigated by spectroscopic methods and mechanical tests. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1208, 127870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Miranda, J.S.; Barcellos, A.S.d.P.; Campos, T.M.B.; Cesar, P.F.; Amaral, M.; Kimpara, E.T. Effect of repeated firings and staining on the mechanical behavior and composition of lithium disilicate. Dent. Mater. 2020, 36, e149–e157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ubaldini, A.L.M.; Pascotto, R.C.; Sato, F.; Soares, V.O.; Baesso, M.L. Mechanical and Chemical Changes in the Adhesive-Dentin Interface after Remineralization. J. Adhes. Dent. 2020, 22, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lubas, M.; Przerada, I.; Zawada, A.; Jasinski, J.J.; Jelen, P. Spectroscopic and microstructural investigation of novel Ti–10Zr–45S5 bioglass composite for dental applications. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1221, 128545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Spies, B.C.; Zhang, F.; Wesemann, C.; Li, M.; Rosentritt, M. Reliability and aging behavior of three different zirconia grades used for monolithic four-unit fixed dental prostheses. Dent. Mater. 2020, 36, e329–e339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Tzanakakis, E.; Kontonasaki, E.; Voyiatzis, G.; Andrikopoulos, K.; Tzoutzas, I. Surface characterization of monolithic zirconia submitted to different surface treatments applying optical interferometry and raman spectrometry. Dent. Mater. J. 2020, 39, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Par, M.; Spanovic, N.; Mohn, D.; Attin, T.; Tauböck, T.T.; Tarle, Z. Curing potential of experimental resin composites filled with bioactive glass: A comparison between Bis-EMA and UDMA based resin systems. Dent. Mater. 2020, 36, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Gugelmin, B.P.; Miguel, L.C.M.; Filho, F.B.; da Cunha, L.F.; Correr, G.M.; Gonzaga, C.C. Colorstability of ceramic veneers luted with resin cements and pre-heated composites: 12 months follow-up. Braz. Dent. J. 2020, 31, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Castillo-Paz, A.M.; Londoño-Restrepo, S.M.; Tirado-Mejía, L.; Mondragón, M.A.; Rodríguez-García, M.E. Nano to micro size transition of hydroxyapatite in porcine bone during heat treatment with low heating rates. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2020, 30, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ramirez-Gutierrez, C.F.; Londoño-Restrepo, S.M.; del Real, A.; Mondragón, M.A.; Rodriguez-García, M.E. Effect of the temperature and sintering time on the thermal, structural, morphological, and vibrational properties of hydroxyapatite derived from pig bone. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 7552–7559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yu, J.; Wang, H.; Zhan, J.; Huang, W. Review of recent UV-Vis and infrared spectroscopy researches on wine detection and discrimination. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2018, 53, 65–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kafle, B.P. Application of UV–VIS spectrophotometry for chemical analysis. In Chemical Analysis and Material Characterization by Spectrophotometry; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 79–145. [Google Scholar]
  120. Kafle, B.P. Theory and instrumentation of absorption spectroscopy. In Chemical Analysis and Material Characterization by Spectrophotometry; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 17–38. [Google Scholar]
  121. Kafle, B.P. Sample preparation methods and choices of reagents. In Chemical Analysis and Material Characterization by Spectrophotometry; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 39–50. [Google Scholar]
  122. Kafle, B.P. Spectrophotometry and its application in chemical analysis. In Chemical Analysis and Material Characterization by Spectrophotometry; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  123. Stürmer, M.; Garcia, I.M.; Souza, V.S.; Visioli, F.; Scholten, J.D.; Samuel, S.M.W.; Leitune, V.C.B.; Collares, F.M. Titanium dioxide nanotubes with triazine-methacrylate monomer to improve physicochemical and biological properties of adhesives. Dent. Mater. 2021, 37, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Keul, C.; Seidl, J.; Güth, J.F.; Liebermann, A. Impact of fabrication procedures on residual monomer elution of conventional polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)—a measurement approach by UV/Vis spectrophotometry. Clin. Oral Investig. 2020, 24, 4519–4530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Castellanos, M.; Delgado, A.J.; Sinhoreti, M.A.C.; de Oliveira, D.C.R.S.; Abdulhameed, N.; Geraldeli, S.; Roulet, J.-F. Effect of Thickness of Ceramic Veneers on Color Stability and Bond Strength of Resin Luting Cements Containing Alternative Photoinitiators. J. Adhes. Dent. 2019, 21, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Mallaiah, M.; Gupta, R.K. Surface Engineering of Titanium Using Anodization and Plasma Treatment. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 943, 12016. [Google Scholar]
  127. Haas, K.; Azhar, G.; Wood, D.J.; Moharamzadeh, K.; van Noort, R. The effects of different opacifiers on the translucency of experimental dental composite resins. Dent. Mater. 2017, 33, e310–e316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Michailova, M.; Elsayed, A.; Fabel, G.; Edelhoff, D.; Zylla, I.M.; Stawarczyk, B. Comparison between novel strength-gradient and color-gradient multilayered zirconia using conventional and high-speed sintering. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2020, 111, 103977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Xiao, Z.; Yu, S.; Li, Y.; Ruan, S.; Kong, L.B.; Huang, Q.; Huang, Z.; Zhou, K.; Su, H.; Yao, Z.; et al. Materials development and potential applications of transparent ceramics: A review. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2020, 139, 100518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Qasim, S.B.; Najeeb, S.; Delaine-Smith, R.M.; Rawlinson, A.; Ur Rehman, I. Potential of electrospun chitosan fibers as a surface layer in functionally graded GTR membrane for periodontal regeneration. Dent. Mater. 2017, 33, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Bostedt, C.; Gorkhover, T.; Rupp, D.; Möller, T. Clusters and Nanocrystals. In Synchrotron Light Sources and Free-Electron Lasers; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1525–1573. ISBN 9783030232016. [Google Scholar]
  132. Fracchia, M.; Ghigna, P.; Vertova, A.; Rondinini, S.; Minguzzi, A. Time-Resolved X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy in (Photo)Electrochemistry. Surfaces 2018, 1, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Taylor, A. Atomic spectroscopy, biomedical applications. In Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 76–80. ISBN 9780128032244. [Google Scholar]
  134. Hirai, N. Surface analysis. In Corrosion Control and Surface Finishing: Environmentally Friendly Approaches; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2016; pp. 47–439. ISBN 9784431559573. [Google Scholar]
  135. Janssens, K. X-ray Based Methods of Analysis. In Modern Methods for Analysing Archaeological and Historical Glass; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2013; Volume 1, pp. 79–128. ISBN 9780470516140. [Google Scholar]
  136. Rajiv, K.; Mittal, K.L. Methods for Assessing Surface Cleanliness. In Developments in Surface Contamination and Cleaning; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2019; Volume 12, pp. 23–105. [Google Scholar]
  137. Watts, J.F. Use of surface analysis methods to probe the interfacial chemistry of adhesion. In Handbook of Adhesion Technology, 2nd ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 1–2, pp. 227–255. ISBN 9783319554112. [Google Scholar]
  138. Bunaciu, A.A.; Udriştioiu, E.G.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. X-ray Diffraction: Instrumentation and Applications. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2015, 45, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Khan, H.; Yerramilli, A.S.; D’Oliveira, A.; Alford, T.L.; Boffito, D.C.; Patience, G.S. Experimental methods in chemical engineering: X-ray diffraction spectroscopy—XRD. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 98, 1255–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Luo, Q. Electron Microscopy and Spectroscopy in the Analysis of Friction and Wear Mechanisms. Lubricants 2018, 6, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Çarıkçıoğlu, B.; Misilli, T.; Deniz, Y.; Aktaş, Ç. Effects of high temperature on dental restorative materials for forensic purposes. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2021, 17, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Fiorillo, L.; D’Amico, C.; Campagna, P.; Terranova, A.; Militi, A. Dental materials implant alloys: A X-ray fluorescence analysis on FDS76®. Minerva Stomatol. 2020, 69, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Montazerian, M.; Zanotto, E.D. Tough, strong, hard, and chemically durable enstatite-zirconia glass-ceramic. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 103, 5036–5049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Cokic, S.M.; Vleugels, J.; Van Meerbeek, B.; Camargo, B.; Willems, E.; Li, M.; Zhang, F. Mechanical properties, aging stability and translucency of speed-sintered zirconia for chairside restorations. Dent. Mater. 2020, 36, 959–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Gunawan, J.; Taufik, D.; Takarini, V.; Hasratinigsih, Z. Self-synthesize and flexural strength test porcelain from Indonesian natural sand. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 550, 012030. [Google Scholar]
  146. Borges, M.A.P.; Alves, M.R.; dos Santos, H.E.S.; dos Anjos, M.J.; Elias, C.N. Oral degradation of Y-TZP ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 9955–9961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Belli, R.; Lohbauer, U.; Goetz-Neunhoeffer, F.; Hurle, K. Crack-healing during two-stage crystallization of biomedical lithium (di)silicate glass-ceramics. Dent. Mater. 2019, 35, 1130–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Kolakarnprasert, N.; Kaizer, M.R.; Kim, D.K.; Zhang, Y. New multi-layered zirconias: Composition, microstructure and translucency. Dent. Mater. 2019, 35, 797–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Hurle, K.; Belli, R.; Götz-Neunhoeffer, F.; Lohbauer, U. Phase characterization of lithium silicate biomedical glass-ceramics produced by two-stage crystallization. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 2019, 510, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Salimkhani, H.; Asghari Fesaghandis, E.; Salimkhani, S.; Abdolalipour, B.; Motei Dizaji, A.; Joodi, T.; Bordbar-Khiabani, A. In situ synthesis of leucite-based feldspathic dental porcelain with minor kalsilite and Fe 2 O 3 impurities. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2019, 16, 552–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Nurdin, D.; Primathena, I.; Farah, R.A.; Cahyanto, A. Comparison of Chemical Composition between Indonesian White Portland Cement and MTA as Dental Pulp Capping Material. Key Eng. Mater. 2019, 829, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Bilandžić, M.D.; Wollgarten, S.; Stollenwerk, J.; Poprawe, R.; Esteves-Oliveira, M.; Fischer, H. Glass-ceramic coating material for the CO2 laser based sintering of thin films as caries and erosion protection. Dent. Mater. 2017, 33, 995–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Yahia, L.H.; Mireles, L.K. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF SIMS). In Characterization of Polymeric Biomaterials; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 83–97. ISBN 9780081007372. [Google Scholar]
  154. Gosetti, F.; Marengo, E. Mass spectrometry|Selected ion monitoring. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Science; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 500–510. ISBN 9780081019832. [Google Scholar]
  155. Lermyte, F. Modern Mass Spectrometry and Advanced Fragmentation Methods. In New Developments in Mass Spectrometry; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2021; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  156. Schaepe, K.; Jungnickel, H.; Heinrich, T.; Tentschert, J.; Luch, A.; Unger, W.E.S. Secondary ion mass spectrometry. In Characterization of Nanoparticles; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 481–509. ISBN 9780128141830. [Google Scholar]
  157. Walker, A.V. Secondary ion mass spectrometry. In Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 44–49. ISBN 9780128032244. [Google Scholar]
  158. Paital, B. Mass Spectrophotometry: An Advanced Technique in Biomedical Sciences. Adv. Tech. Biol. Med. 2015, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Nilsen, B.W.; Jensen, E.; Örtengren, U.; Michelsen, V.B. Analysis of organic components in resin-modified pulp capping materials: Critical considerations. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2017, 125, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Bakopoulou, A.; Papadopoulos, T.; Garefis, P. Molecular Toxicology of Substances Released from Resin–Based Dental Restorative Materials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 3861–3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Chuang, S.F.; Kang, L.L.; Liu, Y.C.; Lin, J.C.; Wang, C.C.; Chen, H.M.; Tai, C.K. Effects of silane- and MDP-based primers application orders on zirconia–resin adhesion—A ToF-SIMS study. Dent. Mater. 2017, 33, 923–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Lima, R.B.W.; Barreto, S.C.; Alfrisany, N.M.; Porto, T.S.; De Souza, G.M.; De Goes, M.F. Effect of silane and MDP-based primers on physico-chemical properties of zirconia and its bond strength to resin cement. Dent. Mater. 2019, 35, 1557–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Lapinska, B.; Rogowski, J.; Nowak, J.; Nissan, J.; Sokolowski, J.; Lukomska-Szymanska, M. Effect of Surface Cleaning Regimen on Glass Ceramic Bond Strength. Molecules 2019, 24, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Möncke, D.; Ehrt, R.; Palles, D.; Efthimiopoulos, I.; Kamitsos, E.I.; Johannes, M. A multi technique study of a new lithium disilicate glass-ceramic spray-coated on ZrO2 substrate for dental restoration. Biomed. Glas. 2017, 3, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. França, R.; Samani, T.D.; Bayade, G.; Yahia, L.; Sacher, E. Nanoscale surface characterization of biphasic calcium phosphate, with comparisons to calcium hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramics. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 420, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Šimková, M.; Tichý, A.; Dušková, M.; Bradna, P. Dental Composites-a Low-Dose Source of Bisphenol A? Physiol. Res. 2020, 69, S295–S304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Cheung, K.H.; Pabbruwe, M.B.; Chen, W.F.; Koshy, P.; Sorrell, C.C. Thermodynamic and microstructural analyses of photocatalytic TiO2 from the anodization of biomedical-grade Ti6Al4V in phosphoric acid or sulfuric acid. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 1609–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. NicDaéid, N. Forensic sciences|Systematic drug identification. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Science; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 75–80. ISBN 9780081019832. [Google Scholar]
  169. Liu, J.; Saw, R.E.; Kiang, Y.H. Calculation of effective penetration depth in X-ray diffraction for pharmaceutical solids. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 99, 3807–3814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Bauer, L.J.; Mustafa, H.A.; Zaslansky, P.; Mantouvalou, I. Chemical mapping of teeth in 2D and 3D: X-ray fluorescence reveals hidden details in dentine surrounding fillings. Acta Biomater. 2020, 109, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Pate, M.L.; Aguilar-Caballos, M.P.; Beltrán-Aroca, C.M.; Pérez-Vicente, C.; Lozano-Molina, M.; Girela-López, E. Use of XRD and SEM/EDX to predict age and sex from fire-affected dental remains. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2018, 14, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FT-IR spectrum of control specimen made by hand and ultrasonic mixing methods as well as the spectrum corresponding to UNIFAST III powder [97].
Figure 1. FT-IR spectrum of control specimen made by hand and ultrasonic mixing methods as well as the spectrum corresponding to UNIFAST III powder [97].
Materials 14 02624 g001
Figure 2. FT-IR data of specimens made by ultrasonic mixing for nano-sized h-BN reinforcement with different concentrations [97].
Figure 2. FT-IR data of specimens made by ultrasonic mixing for nano-sized h-BN reinforcement with different concentrations [97].
Materials 14 02624 g002
Figure 3. Raman spectra of (a) B-560, B-Raw, H-Raw, and commercial bone grafts; (b) bands at 960 cm−1 of the hydroxyapatites samples, and (c) FWHM values of (b) bands [106].
Figure 3. Raman spectra of (a) B-560, B-Raw, H-Raw, and commercial bone grafts; (b) bands at 960 cm−1 of the hydroxyapatites samples, and (c) FWHM values of (b) bands [106].
Materials 14 02624 g003
Figure 4. UV-Vis spectra of the CQ initiator and EDAB, MBTTM and MBTTA coinitiators [94].
Figure 4. UV-Vis spectra of the CQ initiator and EDAB, MBTTM and MBTTA coinitiators [94].
Materials 14 02624 g004
Figure 5. XRD pattern of the glass-ceramic heat-treated at 700 °C for 12 h and then at 1090 °C for 3 min [143].
Figure 5. XRD pattern of the glass-ceramic heat-treated at 700 °C for 12 h and then at 1090 °C for 3 min [143].
Materials 14 02624 g005
Figure 6. ToF-SIMS spectra (m/z = 0–200 amu) for the experimental groups. (A) The positive ion spectra. The characteristic ion peaks of zirconia are Zr+ (m/z 90), ZrO+ (m/z 106). The ion peaks under m/z 55 are mainly from organic components. Peaks at m/z 99 and 120 could be the fragments of MDP monomer. (B) In the negative ion spectra, the signals after m/z 111 were amplified by 5× to reveal the characteristic negative ion peaks of ZrO2 and ZrO2(OH) at m/z 121.9 and 138.9. The characteristic ion SiO3C3H9 (121) in silane is overlapped with ZrO2 and thus the peak at m/z 122 increases [161].
Figure 6. ToF-SIMS spectra (m/z = 0–200 amu) for the experimental groups. (A) The positive ion spectra. The characteristic ion peaks of zirconia are Zr+ (m/z 90), ZrO+ (m/z 106). The ion peaks under m/z 55 are mainly from organic components. Peaks at m/z 99 and 120 could be the fragments of MDP monomer. (B) In the negative ion spectra, the signals after m/z 111 were amplified by 5× to reveal the characteristic negative ion peaks of ZrO2 and ZrO2(OH) at m/z 121.9 and 138.9. The characteristic ion SiO3C3H9 (121) in silane is overlapped with ZrO2 and thus the peak at m/z 122 increases [161].
Materials 14 02624 g006
Figure 7. Histogram of the cited publications published in the years 2000–2020 according to Scopus on the application of spectroscopic methods in the analysis of surface phenomena in the study of dental materials and related issues.
Figure 7. Histogram of the cited publications published in the years 2000–2020 according to Scopus on the application of spectroscopic methods in the analysis of surface phenomena in the study of dental materials and related issues.
Materials 14 02624 g007
Table 1. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for articles.
Table 1. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for articles.
Inclusion CriteriaExclusion Criteria
Research on only dental biomaterials used for restorations.Literature on dental materials and fluids, equipment used as instruments and equipment for a dental office.
Research including ceramics, calcium phosphates, glasses, polymers, adhesives, composites, glass ionomers, silver amalgam, alloys and titanium implants.All papers in other than the English language, where the full text was not available.
Dental material research published no later than 5 years ago.Same data that was published at different times.
Table 2. Spectroscopic techniques in different ranges of electromagnetic spectrum radiation.
Table 2. Spectroscopic techniques in different ranges of electromagnetic spectrum radiation.
Region of Electromagnetic SpectrumWavelength Range λ (m)Spectroscopic Technique
Microwave1–10−3Microwave spectroscopy
Infrared10−3–10−6Infrared spectroscopy
Raman spectroscopy
Ultraviolet and visible10−6–10−8UV-Visible spectroscopy
Atomic absorption spectroscopy
Fluorescence spectroscopy
Phosphorescence spectroscopy
X-ray10−9–10−12X-ray diffraction
X-ray fluorescence
X-ray photoelectron spectrometry
Mass spectrometry
γ-ray10−12–10−14Mossbauer spectroscopy
Table 3. Comparison of spectroscopic methods for examining the surface of dental materials.
Table 3. Comparison of spectroscopic methods for examining the surface of dental materials.
MethodType of SampleAnalytical DepthSample DegradationType of InformationApplication Examples in Dental Biomaterials and Related Research
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)Gas, liquid, solidThe penetration depth is about 0.5–3 µm [72].Non-destructive [69]Quantitative analysis of complex mixtures; the investigation of surface and interfacial phenomena [69]Implant materials (e.g., to characterize the functional groups of the synthesized apatite particles [82], to study the vibrational states of commercial bone grafts, B-Raw, H-Raw, and B-560 to determine the presence of other functional groups in the samples that do not belong to hydroxyapatite [106]);
biopolymers (e.g., characterization of the functional groups in samples of peptide modified demineralized dentin matrix [83]);
ceramics (e.g., to complement XRD results, and to determine dental zirconia superficial molecular compositions) [84]; to identify functional groups of HAp nanostructures in resin nanocomposites [85];
recording chemical constituents of implant coatings (e.g., metronidazole decorated Ti interfaces [86];
to detect chemical groups of the modified PEEK films with covalently grafted osteogenic growth peptide [87]); to analyse hydroxyapatite particles without or with immobilized dextranase [88];
bioceramics (e.g., to analyse phase stable β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) in powder samples [89], to determine bulk composition of calcium phosphates [165]);
dental resins (e.g., to investigate double bond conversion of dental resin matrix [90] and to calculate the degree of double bond conversion and polymerization rate of photopolymerizable co-initiators in dental monomers [94], to analyse microstructural and surface properties of tricalcium silicate-based pulp capping materials [91], to confirm the final structures of the functional nanoparticles (triazole functional silica) as well as nanocomposites incorporating the functional nanoparticles [92], to analyse powders of monomers: TAT, nt-TiO2, and nt-TiO2:TAT to evaluate a possible chemical interaction between TAT and nt-TiO2 [123];
cements (e.g., to identify the degree of conversion of chemically cured resin modified glass-ionomer cements (RMGICs) testing unset liquids and set materials [93], to provide insight of the setting reactions of a hydraulic calcium silicate cement by taking the FTIR spectra of components before and during the setting reaction [95];
bioglass (e.g., to indicated the integration of the Calcarea phosphorica with nano-bioglass ceramic particles [96]);
self-curing materials e.g., to compare the structure of boron nitride reinforced PMMA for dental restorations after hand and ultrasonic mixing [97]
Raman SpectroscopyGas, liquid, solid (in bulk, as microscopic particles, or as surface layers)The penetration depth is about 0.01–2300 µm [101].Non-invasive [56]Qualitative and quantitative: Investigation of rotational and oscillating spectra of molecules; identification of chemicals component [99]structure assessment of anti-corrosion coatings e.g., to confirm the growth of graphene and its transfer onto Ti-6Al-4V discs [104];
bioglass (e.g., to investigate the mineral and organic composition of dentin surfaces; demineralized dentin and dentin remineralized with bioglass [110], to analyse the modification of the Ti-Zr-45S5 bioglass alloy surface after oxidation [111]);
implant materials (e.g., bovine and human bio hydroxyapatites [106]);
ceramics (e.g., chemical analysis of the surface by micro-Raman spectroscopy to establish the presence of MDP monomer on the surface of the zirconia after bonding procedures using MDP containing silane or adhesive [107], to determine the resistance of the titanium substrate to oxidation during the firing of subsequent porcelain layers [108], to assess the chemical composition of the fracture surface in the region of the lithium disilicate ceramic, in the ceramic/staining interface and in the staining applied on the ceramic [109], the complementarily (to XRD) use of micro-Raman to characterize the phase composition of different positions at occlusal loaded area of fixed dental prostheses fabricated from three zirconia grades with varying yttria content [112], to determine phase transformation of the surface of monolithic zirconia submitted to different surface treatments [113],
to investigate structural aspects of the glass-ceramic i.e., differently formed crystals, the vitreous area around the crystals, the interface between the TZ3Y substrate and the glass-ceramic, as well as the outer surface of the glass-ceramic [164];
dental resin composites and cements e.g., to evaluate degree of conversion and maximum rate of polymerization [105,114,115]; to analyse powders of monomers: TAT, nt-TiO2, and nt-TiO2:TAT to evaluate a possible chemical interaction between TAT and nt-TiO2 [123]
UV-Vis SpectroscopyLiquid, solid, gas.The penetration depth is about 0.02–5 µm [167].Allows sample recovery [168]Quantitative: Identification of chemical compounds containing chromophores [168]resins (e.g., to analyse powders of monomers: TAT, nt-TiO2, and nt-TiO2:TAT to evaluate a possible chemical interaction between TAT and nt-TiO2 [123], to collect optical properties data to calculate colour measurements of dental resin composites containing different opacifiers [127], to investigate the optical properties of Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2/Li-BioMOFs structures of resin nanocomposites [85]), polymers (e.g., to determine the maximum absorption of conventional polymethyl methacrylate and the absorption of residual conventional polymethyl methacrylate of specimen eluted in the storage liquid [124]), characterization of co-initiators in photopolymerization of polymers [94,125], oxide layers [126];
ceramics e.g., to analyse the translucency of color-gradient multilayered zirconia, whereas quantitative measurements of translucency can be implemented by analysing the definite transmission of light through each specimen [128,129]
X-ray SpectroscopyPowder, paste, solid or liquidThe penetration depth:
of XRD is about 50–200 mm [169], XPS 1-10 nm, and XRF 0.5–3 μm [170].
Non-destructive and non-invasive [34,171]Quantitative: Analysis of crystal structure and phase composition [60]XPS: biopolymers (e.g., chemical composition of peptide-modified demineralized dentin matrix [83]); anti-corrosion coatings (e.g., to confirm that the graphene film was free of copper residues after ammonium persulfate etching [104]);
to distinguish and identify dental materials e.g., compomer, glass carbomer, ormocer, giomer, zinc reinforced glass ionomer (GI), silver-alloy reinforced GI, zirconia reinforced GI, and conventional GI using X-ray analysis for obtaining elemental compositions before and after the incineration [141];
bioceramics (e.g., to determine the elemental compositions of the outer layers of calcium phosphates [165]);
implant material coatings (e.g., to detect the surface chemical constituents and to confirm the presence of osteogenic growth peptide on PEEK surfaces [87]);
XRF: implant alloys e.g., to evaluate the fixture and abutment surface of internal hexagonal connection systems [142] and to evaluate chemical composition of dental ceramics [143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152];
XRD: implant materials (e.g., to characterize the structure of strontium apatite particles [82]), to measure the crystallinity of hydroxyapatite particles [88], to characterize phase stable β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) [89] or to distinguishing products with the same gross chemical composition but different crystal structures (e.g., different crystal structures of calcium phosphate) [165], to obtain information on the degree of crystallinity of the tricalcium silicate-based pulp capping materials [91];
ceramics (e.g., determination of the crystalline phases in dental zirconia [84,144,146,164], to evaluate phase transformations on the outer surface of fixed dental prostheses fabricated from three zirconia grades with varying yttria content [112], to determine the crystalline phases resulting from the heat treatments of the glass sample in development of strong glass-ceramics based on the crystallization of micron-sized enstatite and nano-sized zirconia and Ti-containing crystals by controlled crystallization of a 51SiO2–35MgO–6Na2O–4ZrO2–4TiO2 (mol%) glass) [143];
bioceramics (e.g., to confirm the crystalline nature of nano-bioglass ceramic particles doped with Calcarea phosphorica [96], to identify the crystalline and amorphous phases of partially crystallized lithium disilicate ceramics in lithium metasilicate phase [109,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150], to analyse phase composition of the Ti-Zr-45S5 bioglass alloy [111];
to characterise the phases, the crystallography and the examination of the crystallite size of the Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2/Li-BioMOFs [85];
bone grafts (e.g., to identify the crystalline phases and changes in full width at the half maximum (FWHM) of commercial bone grafts, bovine and human bones as well as their BIO-HAps obtained by calcination [106]);
self-curing materials (e.g., to observe patterns of boron nitride reinforced PMMA for dental restorations after hand and ultrasonic mixing [97])
Mass SpectrometrysolidSurface nano-layer [34].Non-destructive [34]Qualitative: Composition analysis of solid surfaces and thin films [34]to precisely determine the composition of complex mixtures of compounds e.g., to elucidate the organic composition and eluates of three resin-based pulp-capping materials [159];
resins [161,162]; ceramics e.g., to analyse the compositions and chemical interactions of the 3-methacryloyloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (MPS)- and 10-methacryloyloxydecyl-dihydrogen-phosphate (MDP)-base primers, in their single or sequential applications, to zirconia [161,162], chemical analysis of saliva contaminated glass ceramic surface and after different cleaning regimens [163], to investigate ion diffusion between the veneer ceramic and the ZrO2 based substrate [164], to analyse chemical composition of calcium phosphates [165],
composite materials e.g., the release of BPA from two conventional Bis-GMA-containing and two “BPA-free” restorative resin-based composites, which are commonly used as tooth-coloured filling materials, was examined using liquid chromatography—tandem mass spectrometry [166]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaczmarek, K.; Leniart, A.; Lapinska, B.; Skrzypek, S.; Lukomska-Szymanska, M. Selected Spectroscopic Techniques for Surface Analysis of Dental Materials: A Narrative Review. Materials 2021, 14, 2624. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14102624

AMA Style

Kaczmarek K, Leniart A, Lapinska B, Skrzypek S, Lukomska-Szymanska M. Selected Spectroscopic Techniques for Surface Analysis of Dental Materials: A Narrative Review. Materials. 2021; 14(10):2624. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14102624

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaczmarek, Katarzyna, Andrzej Leniart, Barbara Lapinska, Slawomira Skrzypek, and Monika Lukomska-Szymanska. 2021. "Selected Spectroscopic Techniques for Surface Analysis of Dental Materials: A Narrative Review" Materials 14, no. 10: 2624. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14102624

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop