Next Article in Journal
Physical Properties of Electropolished CoCrMo Alloy Coated with Biodegradable Polymeric Coatings Releasing Heparin after Prolonged Exposure to Artificial Urine
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Yttrium Addition on the Microstructure Evolution and Electrochemical Corrosion of SN-9Zn Lead-Free Solders Alloy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 10
10.3390/ma14102550
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Energetic-Materials-Driven Synthesis of Graphene-Encapsulated Tin Oxide Nanoparticles for Sodium-Ion Batteries

by
Yingchun Wang
1,
Jinxu Liu
1,
Min Yang
1,
Lijuan Hou
2,
Tingting Xu
2,
Shukui Li
1,3,
Zhihua Zhuang
1 and
Chuan He
1,*
1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
2
Key Laboratory of Materials Physics of Ministry of Education, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
3
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenzhen MSU-BIT University, Shenzhen 518172, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(10), 2550; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14102550
Submission received: 21 April 2021 / Revised: 2 May 2021 / Accepted: 9 May 2021 / Published: 14 May 2021
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
By evenly mixing polytetrafluoroethylene-silicon energetic materials (PTFE-Si EMs) with tin oxide (SnO2) particles, we demonstrate a direct synthesis of graphene-encapsulated SnO2 (Gr-SnO2) nanoparticles through the self-propagated exothermic reaction of the EMs. The highly exothermic reaction of the PTFE-Si EMs released a huge amount of heat that induced an instantaneous temperature rise at the reaction zone, and the rapid expansion of the gaseous SiF4 product provided a high-speed gas flow for dispersing the molten particles into finer nanoscale particles. Furthermore, the reaction of the PTFE-NPs with Si resulted in a simultaneous synthesis of graphene that encapsulated the SnO2 nanoparticles in order to form the core-shell nanostructure. As sodium storage material, the graphene-encapsulated SnO2 nanoparticles exhibit a good cycling performance, superior rate capability, and a high initial Coulombic efficiency of 85.3%. This proves the effectiveness of our approach for the scalable synthesis of core-shell-structured graphene-encapsulated nanomaterials.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Possessing synergetic properties of dissimilar materials, carbon-encapsulated materials with a core-shell structure have been reported to exhibit excellent performance in energy storage, environmental applications, and biological applications [1,2,3]. Among these applications, carbon-encapsulated materials are mostly utilized in energy storage devices, especially in secondary batteries, such as lithium-(Li-) and sodium-ion (Na-ion) batteries, as anode materials [4,5,6,7,8]. It has been proven that the combination of high-capacity anode materials with conductive carbon coating simultaneously alleviates the cracks and fractures of the active materials and increases the electrical conductivity of the electrodes, hence greatly improving the performance of the anodes. As for core and shell materials, research studies have demonstrated that the utilization of nanoscale active materials in the inner core can efficiently prevent structural fracture [9,10,11,12] and that using graphene as the outer shell can significantly improve the initial Coulombic efficiency compared to its carbonaceous counterparts [12,13]. In this regard, intensive efforts have been made toward the synthesis of graphene-encapsulated nanomaterials for secondary battery anode materials [14,15,16]. However, most of the technological advances involve complex multistep processing and the use of commercial nanomaterials, thus limiting their further application in anode materials as a result of high costs [17].
In recent years, the synthesis of nanomaterials at high temperatures has drawn great attention for its low-energy consumption, relatively low cost, and scalability [18,19,20,21]. In our previous study, we have demonstrated the production of graphene-encapsulated Si nanoparticles through the intense exothermic reaction of polytetrafluoroethylene-silicon (PTFE-Si) energetic materials (EMs) [22]. As anode material in Li-ion batteries, the core-shell-structured graphene-Si nanocomposites exhibited a good cycling performance, proving the effectiveness of the exothermic reaction for the synthesis of graphene-encapsulated nanomaterials. In this case, Si served a dual role as the metal fuel, which reacted with the PTFE to release heat, and as the Si nanoparticles left after the reaction as the active materials for the anode of Li-ion batteries. However, the majority of high-capacity anode materials for Li- and Na-ion batteries cannot react exothermically with the PTFE, which largely restricts the choices for the materials selection.
In this article, we demonstrate the energetic-materials-driven synthesis of graphene-encapsulated tin oxide (Gr-SnO2) nanoparticles. Here, the SnO2 is chosen for its superior storage capacity in secondary batteries, especially in Na-ion batteries (1378 mAh·g−1 for sodium storage), which is of particular interest due to the low toxicity and wide availability of Na [23,24]. The PTFE-Si EMs are used and evenly mixed with commercial SnO2 particles. Upon ignition, the intense heat released by the self-sustained solid-state exothermic reaction of the PTFE-Si EMs melts the SnO2 particles, and the high-pressure SiF4 gas produced breaks the molten SnO2 into smaller spherical shaped nanoparticles. Concomitantly, the reaction results in a bottom-up synthesis of graphene that encapsulates the SnO2 nanoparticles. Used as the anode material in Na-ion batteries, the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles exhibit a long-term cyclability and superior rate capability. This demonstrates the competence of our approach for the synthesis of graphene-encapsulated nanoparticles.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Synthesis of Gr-SnO2 Nanoparticles

First, 20 g PTFE microparticles were immersed into the 400 mL analytical grade ethanol. The PTFE microparticles have an average diameter of ~60 µm (Shenyang Micro Powder Factory Co., Ltd., Shenyang, China). Second, the PTFE microparticles were disintegrated into nanometer-thick PTFE nanoparticles through ultrasonic processing. The ultrasonic processing was performed for ~4 h at a frequency of 20 kHz and a power of 2.4 kW. Third, 10 g of commercial Si particles (average diameter of ~800 nm, Beijing Xingrongyuan Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and 7.5 g of SnO2 particles (Aladdin, see Supplementary Figure S1) were added into the solution. Next, the sonication processing was continued for ~1 h at a power of 1 kW to mix the three components evenly. Finally, the PTFE/Si/SnO2 mixture was obtained after the filtration and drying processes.
The PTFE/Si/SnO2 mixture (1 g) was placed in a metal groove (80 × 20 × 10 mm), and the exothermic reaction of the mixture was triggered using an electrically heated wire (~0.16 mm Nickel-chromium alloy wire) at one end of the groove. After passing a current of 3 A through the wire, the reaction occurred and a huge amount of soot was produced. The black powders were collected after the reaction and then magnetically stirred in the NaOH solution (1 mol/L) for ~6 h to remove the remaining Si particles. Last, centrifugation and then drying was conducted in a vacuum oven for ~12 h to obtain the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles.

2.2. Characterization

The structure of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Rigaku, Japan) (D-8 Advance, Bruker Inc., Rigaku, Japan, 40 kV, 150 mA, Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.5406 Å). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) analyses were performed with a Thermo ESCALAB 250 Xi spectrometer instrument (monochromatic Kα X-rays at 1486.6 eV). An aluminum anode was used as the source. An Invia/Reflex Laser Micro-Raman spectroscope (Renishaw-invia) was utilized to carry out the Raman measurements (Renishaw, Wotton-under-Edge, Britain). The excitation laser beam wavelength used was 514 nm. The images of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles were obtained using Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (GeminiSEM 300) (ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was carried out using JEM-2100F. High-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM) images were obtained using an FEI Titan G2 microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA), where an aberration corrector was equipped and a Bruker Super-X EDS detector operated at 300 kV. The in situ TEM (ZepTools, Tongling, China) characterization of the sodiation processes of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles was performed using JEM 2100 TEM operated at 200 kV.

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

Using a sodium counter/reference electrode (Lizhiyuan, Taiyuan, China), a CR2025 type coin cell (Lizhiyuan, Taiyuan, China) was assembled in an Ar-filled glove box to evaluate the electrochemical performance of the sample. By mixing active material (Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles) in a ratio of 80:10:10 with polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) binder and conductive super P in 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP) solvent, the working electrode slurry was prepared and then coated on the copper foil and dried in a vacuum at 60 °C for 12 h. The glass fiber membrane was used as the separators. The galvanostatic charge/discharge tests were carried out on a LAND CT-2001A cell test system between 0.01 to 3 V vs. Na+/Na at room temperature. Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) was carried out on an IM600e electrochemical workstation (CH Instruments Ins, Shanghai, China).

3. Result and Discussion

The efficient production of Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles highly depends on the mixing uniformity of the PTFE/Si/SnO2 mixture. The high uniformity greatly enhances the reaction efficiency of the PTFE/Si EMs and also leads to the homogeneous heating of the SnO2 particles, which is of importance for the synthesis of uniform nanoparticles [25]. Thus, a solution-processing technique is employed for mixing the powders. First, the PTFE microparticles were processed in ethanol solution using high-power ultrasonic waves to form a stable colloid dispersion consisting of nanometer-thick PTFE-NPs. In our previous work, by using the PTFE-NPs as the solid-state carbon source, we have demonstrated the successful synthesis of graphene nanosheets and graphene-encapsulated Si nanoparticles through the intense exothermic reaction of PTFE-based energetic materials [22,26]. Second, the Si particles, which had an average size of ~800 nm, and the SnO2 particles, which had an average size of 190 ± 10 nm, were added into the solution, and the sonication processing continued for ~1 h to evenly mix the three different powders. After the drying process, the PTFE/Si/SnO2 mixture was obtained as the starting materials for producing the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles. For the synthesis of Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles, the mixture was placed in a metal groove and ignited at one end of the groove in an ambient atmosphere using an electrically heated metal filament. Once ignited, self-sustained combustion occurred and a huge amount of soot was produced (see Supplementary Figure S2). After the removal of residual Si in the reaction products, the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles were obtained.
The TEM image of a typical Gr-SnO2 nanoparticle and the selected area’s electron diffraction (SAED) pattern are presented in Figure 1a(i,ii), respectively. In Figure 1a(i), it can be observed that the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticle has a near-spherical shape and exhibits an obvious core-shell structure. The lattice fringes in the inner core have a spacing of 0.27 ± 0.01 nm, which corresponds to the (101) planes of SnO2. It can also be seen that few-layer graphene with an interlayer spacing of 0.39 ± 0.02 nm coated conformally on the SnO2 nanoparticle to construct the core-shell structure. The SAED pattern corroborated the crystalline structure of the atomized SnO2 nanoparticles. The core-shell structure of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles is further verified by the elemental analysis using HAADF-STEM, as shown in Figure 1b. Besides, free-standing graphene nanosheets, including single- and few-layer graphene, are also observed (see Figure 1c). The particle size distribution of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles is characterized by TEM, and the histogram of the particle size is presented in Figure 1d, where the mean particle size is determined to be 29.9 ± 0.3 nm. The representative TEM images of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles are shown in the inset of Figure 1d. The reduction of the particle size and the observation of the graphene outer layer demonstrate the formation of core-shell nanostructures, with the SnO2 nanoparticles as the core and the graphene as the shell.
The XRD pattern of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles is compared with that of commercial SnO2 particles in Figure 2a. Clearly, after the combustion process, the crystalline structure of the SnO2 nanoparticles was well-maintained, with all the diffraction peaks being indexed to the tetragonal rutile structure of SnO2. Besides, the byproducts of the reaction, silicon carbide (SiC), are also observed in Figure 2a,b, which presents the Raman spectrum of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles. As can be seen, the peaks located at ~1343 cm−1, ~1589 cm−1, ~2691 cm−1, and ~2926 cm−1 correspond to the D, G, 2D, and D+G bands of graphene, respectively [27,28]. The absence of the characteristic bands of SnO2 can be ascribed to the highly intense graphitic peaks of graphene, which greatly suppress the peaks of SnO2 [29]. The Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles were also characterized by XPS. In Figure 2c, the peaks located at 486.5 eV, 495.0 eV, and 531.6 eV can be assigned to Sn 3d5/2, Sn 3d3/2, and O 1s, respectively, which agrees with the reported data for SnO2 [30,31,32]. The C 1s spectrum of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles is presented in Figure 2d. The peak observed at 283.1 eV corresponds to the SiC, while the peaks at 284.5, 285.3, and 288.5 eV correspond to the C-C, C-O, and −C=O groups, which indicate that the graphene produced is slightly oxidized [22,26]. Furthermore, no peak corresponding to the Si0 (see Supplementary Figure S3) is seen, demonstrating the complete removal of the unreacted Si particles.
The formation of the core-shell-structured Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles can be explained and interpreted as the atomization and encapsulation processes driven by the intense exothermic reaction of PTFE-Si EMs. During this fast reaction process, which is generally in the range of hundreds of microseconds, the highly exothermic reaction of the PTFE-Si EMs releases a huge amount of heat and gaseous SiF4 product [33]. For the Si/PTFE mixture with a similar composition, it has been reported that the average combustion temperature is in the range of 1708 to 1889 K [34], which is comparable to the melting point of SnO2 (1630 ℃); hence, the released heat melted the SnO2 particles and induced an instantaneous temperature rise at the reaction zone. This temperature rise caused a rapid expansion of the SiF4 gas and the subsequent pressure rise. The pressurization rate experiments were carried out using a special-designed vessel with a 220 mL internal volume, and the detail of the experimental setup can be found elsewhere [35]. The pressurization rate of the PTFE/Si EMs of a similar composition was measured to be 5.75 MPa/s, and the peak pressure was determined to be 0.545 MPa (see Supplementary Figure S4). Hence, the rapid expansion of the SiF4 gas provides a high-speed gas flow for dispersing the molten particles into finer nanoscale particles. Furthermore, the reaction of the PTFE-NPs with Si resulted in a synthesis of graphene, including the graphene outer layers that encapsulated the SnO2 nanoparticles and free-standing single- and few-layer graphene nanosheets. This is corroborated with our previous studies [22,26]. According to the above discussion, the energetic-materials-driven atomization and encapsulation processes for the production of Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles are schematically illustrated in Figure 3.
The capability of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles in energy storage applications was further evaluated as anode materials in Na-ion batteries. As shown in Figure 4a, assembled in a half-cell configuration, the cycling performance of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles was evaluated using deep galvanostatic cycling at a current density of 200 mA·g−1 between 0.01 and 3.00 V. It can be seen that the Gr-SnO2 electrode delivers a high discharge capacity of 469 mAh·g−1 at the 100th cycle. Figure 4b shows the typical galvanostatic charge/discharge profiles of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd cycles tested at a current density of 200 mA·g−1. The core-shell-structured nanoparticles deliver an initial discharge/charge capacity of 1230.0/1048.8 mAh·g−1 and an initial-cycle Coulombic efficiency (ICE) of 85.3%. As the number of cycles increases, the Coulomb efficiency gradually increases to about 100% due to the formation of a relatively stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) [22]. The sodiation reaction is also investigated by in situ TEM technique. Figure 4c presents the TEM high-resolution images of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles and the corresponding SAED pattern before and after the first sodiation cycle. The second SAED pattern confirms the existence of crystalline Na15Sn4 phases after the sodiation, indicating that the SnO2 nanoparticles in the inner core were fully sodiated [24,36].
Figure 5a presents the first CV curves of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles with a scan rate of 0.1 mV·s−1 in a potential window of 3 to 0.01 V. In the cathodic scan, the peak observed at around 1.0 V may originate from the formation of SEI layers and the conversion of SnO2 to Sn. The peak that appears at around 0.7 V can be assigned to the alloying reaction between Sn and Na ions. The characteristic peak at 0.01 V can be associated with the intercalation reaction of carbon with Na ions [37,38]. In the anodic scan, the peaks at around 0.25 V and 0.6 V correspond to the dealloying reaction of Na15Sn4. In addition, the broad peak at around 1.25 V corresponds to the conversion reaction of Sn to SnO2 [37]. Figure 5b shows the rate capability of Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles at diverse current densities ranging from 0.1 A·g−1 to 1 A·g−1, respectively. The Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles deliver discharge capacities of 444.9, 378.8, 304.8, 280.8, and 209.5 mAh·g−1 at current densities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.5, and 1 A·g−1, respectively. Even after cycling at a current density of 1 A·g−1, the reversible capacity can still return to 448.1 mAh·g−1 at a current density of 0.1 A·g−1, which demonstrates a superior cycle stability. At a higher rate, the coated tin dioxide materials show a better mechanical adjustment ability, thus achieving a good rate performance [39].
As a critical parameter of the energy density of Na-ion full batteries, the ICE of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles is amongst the highest reported for the anode materials of Na-ion batteries [37,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. The high ICE can be ascribed to the structural features of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles, where the nanoscale core material shortens the ion diffusion path and the graphene coating facilitates the transport of electrons and ions to the core material [13,47]. Additionally, the outer layer graphene also exhibits a good mechanical stability that supports the formation of a stable SEI layer during cycling [13]. Table 1 compares the electrochemical performance of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles with that of the reported SnO2-based composites. It can be found that the electrochemical performance of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles is one of the best among the SnO2-based composites.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have presented a scalable approach for the synthesis of graphene-encapsulated SnO2 nanoparticles as sodium storage materials. Using a solution-processing technique, commercial SnO2 particles are evenly mixed with PTFE-Si EMs consisting of nanometer-thick PTFE and Si particles. Upon ignition, the intense heat and gaseous SiF4 product was released, leading to the atomization of the SnO2 particles, and the synthesis of graphene at a high temperature resulted in a simultaneous encapsulation process in order to form core-shell-structured graphene-SnO2 nanoparticles. Used as anode materials in Na-ion batteries, the graphene-encapsulated SnO2 nanoparticles exhibit a good cycling performance, rate capability, and high ICE, demonstrating the structural integrity of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticle. Our approach provides a direct way to synthesize graphene-encapsulated nanomaterials through the highly exothermic reaction of EMs.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma14102550/s1, Figure S1: SEM image of the SnO2 particles, Figure S2: The photograph of the combustion process of the PTFE/Si/SnO2 mixture in the ambient atmosphere recorded using a high-speed camera, Figure S3: The high-resolution Si 2p spectrum of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles, Figure S4: Curve of the pressure versus time of 0.5g of 70PTFE-30Si (wt.%) in closed bomb with 220 mL internal volume. The size of Si particles is 500 nm.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L. and C.H.; methodology, Y.W. and M.Y.; software, Y.W., M.Y. and Z.Z.; validation, Y.W. and M.Y.; formal analysis, S.L.; resources, J.L., L.H. and T.X.; data curation, Y.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W.; writing—review and editing, C.H.; project administration, J.L. and S.L.; funding acquisition, C.H. and T.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 11804022, 11504331 and Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflict to declare.

References

  1. Morales-Narváez, E.; Sgobbi, L.F.; Machado, S.A.S.; Merkoçi, A. Graphene-encapsulated materials: Synthesis, applications and trends. Prog. Mater.Sci. 2017, 86, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ghosh Chaudhuri, R.; Paria, S. Core/Shell Nanoparticles: Classes, Properties, Synthesis Mechanisms, Characterization, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 2373–2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sarno, M.; Baldino, L.; Scudieri, C.; Cardea, S.; Ciambelli, P.; Reverchon, E. SC-CO2-assisted process for a high energy density aerogel supercapacitor: The effect of GO loading. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 204001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pomerantseva, E.; Bonaccorso, F.; Feng, X.; Cui, Y.; Gogotsi, Y. Energy storage: The future enabled by nanomaterials. Science 2019, 366, eaan8285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Yabuuchi, N.; Kubota, K.; Dahbi, M.; Komaba, S. Research Development on Sodium-Ion Batteries. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11636–11682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ng, S.-H.; Wang, J.; Wexler, D.; Konstantinov, K.; Guo, Z.-P.; Liu, H.-K. Highly Reversible Lithium Storage in Spheroidal Carbon-Coated Silicon Nanocomposites as Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 7050–7053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fan, X.; Shao, J.; Xiao, X.; Wang, X.; Li, S.; Ge, H.; Chen, L.; Wang, C. In situ synthesis of SnO2 nanoparticles encapsulated in micro/mesoporous carbon foam as a high-performance anode material for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 18367–18374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ma, C.; Xu, T.; Wang, Y. Advanced carbon nanostructures for future high performance sodium metal anodes. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 25, 811–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, X.; Wan, L.-J.; Guo, Y.-G. Binding SnO2 Nanocrystals in Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Sheets as Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2152–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Liu, Y.; Zhang, N.; Jiao, L.; Tao, Z.; Chen, J. Ultrasmall Sn Nanoparticles Embedded in Carbon as High-Performance Anode for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chan, C.K.; Peng, H.; Liu, G.; McIlwrath, K.; Zhang, X.F.; Huggins, R.A.; Cui, Y. High-performance lithium battery anodes using silicon nanowires. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 3, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, N.; Lu, Z.; Zhao, J.; McDowell, M.T.; Lee, H.-W.; Zhao, W.; Cui, Y. A pomegranate-inspired nanoscale design for large-volume-change lithium battery anodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, Y.; Yan, K.; Lee, H.-W.; Lu, Z.; Liu, N.; Cui, Y. Growth of conformal graphene cages on micrometre-sized silicon particles as stable battery anodes. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 15029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Son, I.H.; Hwan Park, J.; Kwon, S.; Park, S.; Rümmeli, M.H.; Bachmatiuk, A.; Song, H.J.; Ku, J.; Choi, J.W.; Choi, J.-M.; et al. Silicon carbide-free graphene growth on silicon for lithium-ion battery with high volumetric energy density. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Zhou, X.; Yin, Y.-X.; Wan, L.-J.; Guo, Y.-G. Self-Assembled Nanocomposite of Silicon Nanoparticles Encapsulated in Graphene through Electrostatic Attraction for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 1086–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wen, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Langrock, A.; Manivannan, A.; Ehrman, S.H.; Wang, C. Graphene-bonded and -encapsulated Si nanoparticles for lithium ion battery anodes. Small 2013, 9, 2810–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, Y.; Liu, N.; Cui, Y. Promises and challenges of nanomaterials for lithium-based rechargeable batteries. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Luong, D.X.; Bets, K.V.; Algozeeb, W.A.; Stanford, M.G.; Kittrell, C.; Chen, W.; Salvatierra, R.V.; Ren, M.; McHugh, E.A.; Advincula, P.A.; et al. Gram-scale bottom-up flash graphene synthesis. Nature 2020, 577, 647–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Li, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, K.; Sun, X.; Liu, G.; Li, J.; Tian, H.; Li, J.; Ma, Y. Scalable Self-Propagating High-Temperature Synthesis of Graphene for Supercapacitors with Superior Power Density and Cyclic Stability. Adv. Mater. 2016, 29, 1604690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lin, J.; Peng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ruiz-Zepeda, F.; Ye, R.; Samuel, E.L.G.; Yacaman, M.J.; Yakobson, B.I.; Tour, J.M. Laser-induced porous graphene films from commercial polymers. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Nersisyan, H.H.; Lee, J.H.; Ding, J.-R.; Kim, K.-S.; Manukyan, K.V.; Mukasyan, A.S. Combustion synthesis of zero-, one-, two- and three-dimensional nanostructures: Current trends and future perspectives. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2017, 63, 79–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, M.; Liu, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; He, C. Ultrafast synthesis of graphene nanosheets encapsulated Si nanoparticles via deflagration of energetic materials for lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 2019, 65, 104028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Slater, M.D.; Kim, D.; Lee, E.; Johnson, C.S. Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 947–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lao, M.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, W.; Yan, Q.; Sun, W.; Dou, S.X. Alloy-Based Anode Materials toward Advanced Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dreizin, E.L. Metal-based reactive nanomaterials. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2009, 35, 141–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, M.; Liu, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, S.; Zhuang, Z.; Wang, Y.; He, C. Self-sustained solid-state exothermic reaction for scalable graphene production. Mater. Des. 2020, 196, 109135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ferrari, A.C.; Meyer, J.C.; Scardaci, V.; Casiraghi, C.; Lazzeri, M.; Mauri, F.; Piscanec, S.; Jiang, D.; Novoselov, K.S.; Roth, S.; et al. Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 187401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Pimenta, M.A.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M.S.; Cançado, L.G.; Jorio, A.; Saito, R. Studying disorder in graphite-based systems by Raman spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 1276–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mishra, M.; Singh, A.P.; Singh, B.P.; Dhawan, S.K. Performance of a nanoarchitectured tin oxide@reduced graphene oxide composite as a shield against electromagnetic polluting radiation. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 25904–25911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Morgan, W.E.; Van Wazer, J.R. Binding energy shifts in the x-ray photoelectron spectra of a series of related Group IVa compounds. J. Phys. Chem. 1973, 77, 964–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Thomas, J.H. III X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of hydrogen plasma interactions with a tin oxide surface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1983, 42, 794–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Themlin, J.-M.; Chtaïb, M.; Henrard, L.; Lambin, P.; Darville, J.; Gilles, J.-M. Characterization of tin oxides by x-ray-photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46, 2460–2466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, Y.; Gao, B.; Qiao, Z.; Hu, Y.; Zheng, W.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Ji, G.; Yang, G. Gram-Scale Synthesis of Graphene Quantum Dots from Single Carbon Atoms Growth via Energetic Material Deflagration. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 4319–4327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Terry, B.C.; Son, S.F.; Groven, L.J. Altering combustion of silicon/polytetrafluoroethylene with two-step mechanical activation. Combust. Flame 2015, 162, 1350–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lan, J.; Liu, J.; Zhang, S.; Xue, X.; Li, S.J.M. Design Influence of multi-oxidants on reaction characteristics of PTFE-Al-XmOY reactive material. Mater. Des. 2019, 186, 108325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gu, M.; Kushima, A.; Shao, Y.; Zhang, J.-G.; Liu, J.; Browning, N.D.; Li, J.; Wang, C. Probing the Failure Mechanism of SnO2 Nanowires for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 5203–5211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, T.; Qu, J.; Legut, D.; Qin, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q. Unique Double-Interstitialcy Mechanism and Interfacial Storage Mechanism in the Graphene/Metal Oxide as the Anode for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 3122–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jiang, B.; He, Y.; Li, B.; Zhao, S.; Wang, S.; He, Y.B.; Lin, Z. Polymer-Templated Formation of Polydopamine-Coated SnO2 Nanocrystals: Anodes for Cyclable Lithium-Ion Batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2017, 56, 1869–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, L.; Yan, J.; Xu, Z.; Wang, W.; Wen, J.; Bai, X. Rate mechanism of vanadium oxide coated tin dioxide nanowire electrode for lithium ion battery. Nano Energy 2017, 42, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. He, H.; Sun, D.; Tang, Y.; Wang, H.; Shao, M. Understanding and improving the initial Coulombic efficiency of high-capacity anode materials for practical sodium ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 23, 233–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cheng, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhou, L.; Chang, L.; Liu, W.; Yin, D.; Yi, Z.; Wang, L. SnO2 Quantum Dots: Rational Design to Achieve Highly Reversible Conversion Reaction and Stable Capacities for Lithium and Sodium Storage. Small 2020, 16, e2000681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, Y.; Jin, Y.; Zhao, C.; Pan, E.; Jia, M. 1D ultrafine SnO2 nanorods anchored on 3D graphene aerogels with hierarchical porous structures for high-performance lithium/sodium storage. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 532, 352–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liang, J.; Yuan, C.; Li, H.; Fan, K.; Wei, Z.; Sun, H.; Ma, J. Growth of SnO2 Nanoflowers on N-doped Carbon Nanofibers as Anode for Li- and Na-ion Batteries. Nanomicro Lett. 2018, 10, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Li, X.; Sun, X.; Gao, Z.; Hu, X.; Guo, J.; Cai, S.; Guo, R.; Ji, H.; Zheng, C.; Hu, W. Fabrication of porous carbon sphere@SnO2 @carbon layer coating composite as high performance anode for sodium-ion batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 433, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhou, D.; Li, X.; Fan, L.-Z.; Deng, Y. Three-dimensional porous graphene-encapsulated CNT@SnO2 composite for high-performance lithium and sodium storage. Electr. Acta 2017, 230, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, Y.; Jin, Y.; Zhao, C.; Duan, Y.; He, X.; Jia, M. SnO2 quantum dots/graphene aerogel composite as high-performance anode material for sodium ion batteries. Mater. Lett. 2017, 191, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Entwistle, J.; Rennie, A.; Patwardhan, S. A review of magnesiothermic reduction of silica to porous silicon for lithium-ion battery applications and beyond. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 18344–18356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Materials 14 02550 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) i: The high-resolution TEM image of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticle and ii: the selected area’s electron diffraction pattern corresponding to crystalline SnO2. The interplanar spacing of the SnO2 core and graphene outer layer is determined to be 0.27 ± 0.01 and 0.39 ± 0.02 nm. (b) The HAADF-STEM image along with the elemental analysis of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticle. (c) The TEM images of single-layer and few-layer free-standing graphene nanosheets. (d) The histogram of the particle sizes of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles. The insets are the TEM images of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles.
Figure 1. (a) i: The high-resolution TEM image of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticle and ii: the selected area’s electron diffraction pattern corresponding to crystalline SnO2. The interplanar spacing of the SnO2 core and graphene outer layer is determined to be 0.27 ± 0.01 and 0.39 ± 0.02 nm. (b) The HAADF-STEM image along with the elemental analysis of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticle. (c) The TEM images of single-layer and few-layer free-standing graphene nanosheets. (d) The histogram of the particle sizes of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles. The insets are the TEM images of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles.
Materials 14 02550 g001
Materials 14 02550 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) The XRD patterns of the commercial SnO2 particles and Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles. (b) The Raman spectrum of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles. (c) The high-resolution Sn 3d5/2, Sn 3d3/2, and O 1s spectrum of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles. (d) The high-resolution C 1s spectrum of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles.
Figure 2. (a) The XRD patterns of the commercial SnO2 particles and Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles. (b) The Raman spectrum of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles. (c) The high-resolution Sn 3d5/2, Sn 3d3/2, and O 1s spectrum of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles. (d) The high-resolution C 1s spectrum of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles.
Materials 14 02550 g002
Materials 14 02550 g003 550
Figure 3. The schematic illustration of energetic-materials-driven atomization and encapsulation processes for the synthesis of graphene-encapsulated SnO2 nanoparticles.
Figure 3. The schematic illustration of energetic-materials-driven atomization and encapsulation processes for the synthesis of graphene-encapsulated SnO2 nanoparticles.
Materials 14 02550 g003
Materials 14 02550 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Discharge capacity of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles for the 100 galvanostatic cycles. The current density of 200 mA·g−1 is used for all the cycles. (b) Galvanostatic charge/discharge curves of Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles at 200 mA·g−1. (c) The HRTEM images of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles and the SAED pattern of the unsodiated and sodiated Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles.
Figure 4. (a) Discharge capacity of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles for the 100 galvanostatic cycles. The current density of 200 mA·g−1 is used for all the cycles. (b) Galvanostatic charge/discharge curves of Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles at 200 mA·g−1. (c) The HRTEM images of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles and the SAED pattern of the unsodiated and sodiated Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles.
Materials 14 02550 g004
Materials 14 02550 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) CV curves of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles. The voltage window is 3–0.01 V. (b) Rate performance of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles. Current densities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.5, and 1 A·g−1 are used for the cycles.
Figure 5. (a) CV curves of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles. The voltage window is 3–0.01 V. (b) Rate performance of the Gr-SnO2 nanoparticles. Current densities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.5, and 1 A·g−1 are used for the cycles.
Materials 14 02550 g005
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the electrochemical performances of the SnO2-based materials for SIBs.
Table 1. Comparison of the electrochemical performances of the SnO2-based materials for SIBs.
MaterialsCycling PerformanceRate CapacityCoulomb EfficiencyRef.
SnO2 NRs@GA232 mAh·g−1 @50 mA·g−196 mAh·g−1 @1 A·g−158.4% [42]
NC@SnO2270 mAh·g−1 @100 mA·g−1193 mAh·g−1 @1 A·g−138.2% [43]
SnO2 QDs/GA319 mAh·g−1 @50 mA·g−1150 mAh·g−1 @800 mA·g−154% [46]
CNT@SnO2@G323 mAh·g−1 @25 mA·g−1119 mAh·g−1 @1 A g−143% [45]
PCS@SnO2@C326 mAh·g−1 @50 mA·g−182 mAh·g−1 @1.6 A·g−153.5% [44]
SnO2/NC-2342.2 mAh·g−1 @100 mA·g−1212.6 mAh·g−1 @1 A·g−159.2% [41]
C/SnO2/C370 mAh·g−1 @100 mA·g−1105 mAh·g−1 @10 A·g−1- [37]
Gr-SnO2469 mAh·g−1@100 mA·g−1209.5 mAh·g−1@1 A·g−185.3%This work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Yang, M.; Hou, L.; Xu, T.; Li, S.; Zhuang, Z.; He, C. Energetic-Materials-Driven Synthesis of Graphene-Encapsulated Tin Oxide Nanoparticles for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Materials 2021, 14, 2550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14102550

AMA Style

Wang Y, Liu J, Yang M, Hou L, Xu T, Li S, Zhuang Z, He C. Energetic-Materials-Driven Synthesis of Graphene-Encapsulated Tin Oxide Nanoparticles for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Materials. 2021; 14(10):2550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14102550

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yingchun, Jinxu Liu, Min Yang, Lijuan Hou, Tingting Xu, Shukui Li, Zhihua Zhuang, and Chuan He. 2021. "Energetic-Materials-Driven Synthesis of Graphene-Encapsulated Tin Oxide Nanoparticles for Sodium-Ion Batteries" Materials 14, no. 10: 2550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14102550

APA Style

Wang, Y., Liu, J., Yang, M., Hou, L., Xu, T., Li, S., Zhuang, Z., & He, C. (2021). Energetic-Materials-Driven Synthesis of Graphene-Encapsulated Tin Oxide Nanoparticles for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Materials, 14(10), 2550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14102550

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop