Next Article in Journal
Material-Oriented Shape Functions for FGM Plate Finite Element Formulation
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Nickel and Titanium on Properties of Fe-Al-Si Alloy Prepared by Mechanical Alloying and Spark Plasma Sintering
Open AccessReview

Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond

1
Center of Excellence in Transportation Electrification and Energy Storage (CETEES), Hydro-Québec, 1806, Lionel-Boulet Blvd., Varennes, QC J3X 1S1, Canada
2
Mining and Materials Engineering, McGill University, 3610 University Street, Montréal, QC H3A 0C5, Canada
3
Energy Research Institute, NTU, 1 Cleantech loop, Singapore 634672, Singapore
4
Centre de Recherche d’Hydro-Québec (CRHQ), 600, avenue de la Montagne, Shawinigan, QC G9N 7N5, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(3), 801; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030801
Received: 21 December 2019 / Revised: 18 January 2020 / Accepted: 4 February 2020 / Published: 10 February 2020
An exponential market growth of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) has been observed in the past 20 years; approximately 670,000 tons of LIBs have been sold in 2017 alone. This trend will continue owing to the growing interest of consumers for electric vehicles, recent engagement of car manufacturers to produce them, recent developments in energy storage facilities, and commitment of governments for the electrification of transportation. Although some limited recycling processes were developed earlier after the commercialization of LIBs, these are inadequate in the context of sustainable development. Therefore, significant efforts have been made to replace the commonly employed pyrometallurgical recycling method with a less detrimental approach, such as hydrometallurgical, in particular sulfate-based leaching, or direct recycling. Sulfate-based leaching is the only large-scale hydrometallurgical method currently used for recycling LIBs and serves as baseline for several pilot or demonstration projects currently under development. Conversely, most project and processes focus only on the recovery of Ni, Co, Mn, and less Li, and are wasting the iron phosphate originating from lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries. Although this battery type does not dominate the LIB market, its presence in the waste stream of LIBs causes some technical concerns that affect the profitability of current recycling processes. This review explores the current processes and alternative solutions to pyrometallurgy, including novel selective leaching processes or direct recycling approaches. View Full-Text
Keywords: recycling; Li-ion battery; process review; hydrometallurgy; direct recycling recycling; Li-ion battery; process review; hydrometallurgy; direct recycling
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Larouche, F.; Tedjar, F.; Amouzegar, K.; Houlachi, G.; Bouchard, P.; Demopoulos, G.P.; Zaghib, K. Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond. Materials 2020, 13, 801.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop